The document discusses the DART (Detecting and Recording Archaeological Traces) project, which aims to improve archaeological detection techniques by taking a scientific approach. It involves intensive ground observation and data collection at sites to better understand how archaeological remains generate detectable contrasts and how those contrasts are influenced by environmental factors over time. The data collected includes spectro-radiometry, soil moisture and temperature probes, weather data, and aerial imagery. Preliminary analysis of temperature, moisture, and resistance data show changes seasonally that could help predict optimal times for detection. The open science approach seeks to further archaeological prospection methods.
1. DART - Improving the science
underpinning archaeological detection
Anthony (Ant) Beck
Twitter: AntArch
IC ArchPro Workshop 1 - Airborne Remote Sensing
Vienna - 30th November 2011
School of Computing
Faculty of Engineering
2. Overview
•How do we detect stuff
•Why DART
•Going back to first principles
•DART overview
•Data so far
•Open Science
3. Overview
There is no need to take notes:
Slides –
Text –
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/393477/MindMaps/Events/Conference
sAndWorkshops.html
There is every need to ask questions
6. Archaeological Prospection
What is the basis for detection
Micro-Topographic variations
Soil Marks
• variation in mineralogy and
moisture properties
Differential Crop Marks
• constraint on root depth and
moisture availability changing
crop stress/vigour
Proxy Thaw Marks
• Exploitation of different thermal
capacities of objects expressed
in the visual component as
thaw marks
Now you see me
dont
7. Archaeological Prospection
What is the basis for detection
At the small scale:
• The archaeological record can be
considered as a more or less
continuous spatial distribution of
artefacts, structures, organic
remains, chemical residues,
topographic variations and other
less obvious modifications
8. Archaeological Prospection
What is the basis for detection
At the large scale:
• The distribution is far from even, with
large areas where archaeological
remains are widely and infrequently
dispersed. There are other areas,
however, where materials and other
remains are abundant and clustered.
It is these peaks of abundance that
are commonly referred to as sites,
features, anomalies (whatever!).
9. Archaeological Prospection
What is the basis for detection
Discovery requires the detection of one or more site
constituents.
The important points for archaeological detection are:
• Archaeological sites are physical and chemical phenomena.
• There are different kinds of site constituents.
• The abundance and spatial distribution of different constituents vary
both between sites and within individual sites.
• These attributes may be masked or accentuated by a variety of other
phenomena.
• Importantly from a remote sensing perspective archaeological site do
not exhibit consistent spectral signatures
10. Archaeological Prospection
What is the basis for detection
We detect Contrast:
• Between the expression of the remains
and the local 'background' value
Direct Contrast:
• where a measurement, which exhibits a
detectable contrast with its surroundings,
is taken directly from an archaeological
residue.
Proxy Contrast:
• where a measurement, which exhibits a
detectable contrast with its surroundings,
is taken indirectly from an archaeological
residue (for example from a crop mark).
14. Archaeological Prospection
Summary
The sensor must have:
• The spatial resolution to resolve the feature
• The spectral resolution to resolve the contrast
• The radiometric resolution to identify the change
• The temporal sensitivity to record the feature when the contrast is
exhibited
The image must be captured at the right time:
• Different features exhibit contrast characteristics at different times
17. Why DART? ‘Things’ are not well understood
Environmental processes
Sensor responses (particularly new
sensors)
Constraining factors (soil, crops etc.)
Bias and spatial variability
Techniques are scaling!
• Geophysics!
IMPACTS ON
• Deployment
• Management
22. Why DART? Traditional AP exemplar
Significant bias in its application
• in the environmental areas where it is
productive (for example clay
environments tend not to be
responsive)
• Surveys don’t tend to be systematic
• Interpretation tends to be more art
than science
23. What do we do about this?
Go back to first principles:
• Understand the phenomena
• Understand the sensor
characteristics
• Understand the relationship
between the sensor and the
phenomena
• Understand the processes better
• Understand when to apply
techniques
24. What do we do about this? Understand the
phenomena
How does the object generate an
observable contrast to it's local
matrix?
• Physical
• Chemical
• Biological
• etc
Are the contrasts permanent or
transitory?
25. What do we do about this? Understand the
phenomena
If transitory why are they
occurring?
• Is it changes in?
• Soil type
• Land management
• Soil moisture
• Temperature
• Nutrient availability
• Crop type
• Crop growth stage
26. What do we do about this? Understand the
relationship between the sensor and the phenomena
27. What do we do about this? Understand the
relationship between the sensor and the phenomena
28. What do we do about this? Understand the
relationship between the sensor and the phenomena
determines how finely a system can
represent or distinguish differences of
intensity
is usually expressed as a number of
levels or a number of bits
• for example 8 bits or 256 levels
Higher radiometric resolution means
that more subtle differences of
intensity or reflectivity can be
detected
Signal to noise ratios can be a
problem
29. What do we do about this? Understand the
relationship between the sensor and the phenomena
30. What do we do about this? Understand the
relationship between the sensor and the phenomena
31. What do we do about this? Understand the
processes better
So what causes these
localised variations?
• Local conditions structure how any
contrast difference is exhibited:
• Soil type
• Crop type
• Moisture
• Nutrients
• Diurnal temperature variations
32. What do we do about this? Understand the
processes better
Expressed contrast differences
change over time
• Seasonal variations
• crop phenology (growth)
• moisture
• temperature
• nutrients
• Diurnal variations
• sun angle (topographic features)
• temperature variations
33. What do we do about this? Understand the
processes better
Exacerbated by anthropogenic
actions
• Cropping
• Irrigation
• Harrowing
34. What do we do about this? Example from multi or
hyper spectral imaging
38. DART: Ground Observation Benchmarking
Based upon an understanding of:
• Nature of the archaeological residues
• Nature of archaeological material (physical and chemical structure)
• Nature of the surrounding material with which it contrasts
• How proxy material (crop) interacts with archaeology and surrounding
matrix
• Sensor characteristics
• Spatial, spectral, radiometric and temporal
• How these can be applied to detect contrasts
• Environmental characteristics
• Complex natural and cultural variables that can change rapidly over
time
39. DART: Ground Observation Benchmarking
Try to understand the periodicity of change
• Require intensive ground observation (spectro-radiometry, soil and crop
analysis) at known sites (and their surroundings) in a range of different
environments under different environmental conditions
40. DART: Sites
Location
• Diddington, Cambridgeshire
• Harnhill, Gloucestershire
Both with
• contrasting clay and 'well draining'
soils
• an identifiable archaeological
repertoire
• under arable cultivation
Contrasting Macro environmental
characteristics
47. DART: Weather Station
Davis Vantage Pro Weather station
• Collects a range of technical data e.g.
• Wind speed
• Wind direction
• Rainfall
• Temperature
• Humidity
• Solar Radiation
• Barometric Pressure
• And derivatives
• Wind Chill
• Heat Index
55. DART: Data so far - Temperature
There appears to be some problems with the recording
Useful tool for
• Scheduling diurnal thermal inertia flights
• Calibrating the TDR readings
56. DART: Data so far - Permittivity
Key aims
• Investigate the propagation of EM radiation in different soil conditions
(e.g. temperature, magnetic permeability, moisture content, density) and
identify the difference between archaeological residue and the
surrounding soil matrix
• Attempt to use geotechnical properties (e.g. particle size distribution,
moisture content) to predict the geophysical responses of the different
EM sensors used in aerial and geophysical work
• Link the soil properties to local weather and other environmental factors
to enable better planning for collection techniques
57. DART: Data so far - Permittivity
TDR - How does it work
• Sends a pulse of EM energy
• Due to changes in impedance, at the start and at the end of the probe,
the pulse is reflected back and the reflections can be identified on the
waveform trace
• The distance between these two reflection points is used to determine
the Dielectric permittivity
• Different soils have different dielectric permittivity
• This needs calibrating before soil moisture can be derived from the
sensors
61. DART: Data so far - Permittivity
Further analysis of permittivity and conductivity against rainfall
Linking the changes to the weather patterns
Comparisons can be made between
• Soils at different depths
• Archaeological and non-archaeological features
• Different soil types at the different locations
62. DART: Data so far - Permittivity
Conversion to moisture content is also a priority
Requires calibration using different mixing models including:
• empirical
• semi-empirical
• physical volumetric
• phenomenological models
This will help us to link the changes in geophysical responses
to the composition of the soil and predict future responses, as
well as supporting investigations into crop stress and vigour.
64. DART: Data so far – Earth Resistance
The measured earth resistance of a site will change
throughout the year.
This is due to many factors which exist in the natural
landscape.
It is not the broad change of readings we are interested in
• Not Quantitative
but how the readings within the archaeological feature change
compared to the readings of the natural surrounding soil
• But Relative
65. DART: Data so far – Earth Resistance
methodology similar to that employed by Parkyn et al. (2011)
Overview
• data points
• lie within the ditch feature
• over the non-archaeological feature
• find an average data value for the feature and the surrounding soil
The percentage difference between these two figures can
then be considered the amount of contrast within the test
area.
The higher the percentage, the better the feature is able to be
defined.
66. DART: Data so far – Earth Resistance
Methodology:
• The raw geophysical data is despiked
• Specific data points are chosen for examination
• Data values are extracted at different probe separations
• The percentage difference is calculated
67. DART: Data so far – Earth Resistance
Probe Separation (m)
0.25 0.5 0.75 1
18.047425 18.885 18.8968 16.794
June 52 45 96 03
19.135177 17.152 17.0816 15.019
July 94 05 13 06
August #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
20
8.8411898 14.5124 15.530 Change of Contrast Factors with
September 68 13.255 63 69
Seasons
Contrast Factor (%)
7.9881288 10.977 12.2170 11.622
15
October 39 14 18 9
Twin Probe
10 Electrode
Seperation (m)
0.2
5
5 0.5
June July August September October
0.7
0.25 18.04742 19.13517 8.841189 7.988128 5
0.5 18.88544 17.15204 13.25500 10.97714
0.75 18.89689 17.08161 14.51246 12.21701
1 16.79403 15.01905 15.53069 11.62289
68. DART: Data so far – Earth Resistance
Z values of Ditch and Natural
measurements at CC1011
0.5
SD from mean of dataset
0
-0.5
-1
-1.5
-2
0.25 0.5 0.75 1
Ditch -1.268861893 -1.56669708 -1.640283843 -1.362385321
Natural -0.038363171 0.161952555 0.239082969 0.246559633
71. Spectro-radiometry: Methodology
• Recorded monthly
• Twice monthly at Diddington during the growing season
• Transects across linear features
• Taken in the field where weather conditions permit
• Surface coverage evaluated using near-vertical photography
• Vegetation properties recorded along transect
• Chlorophyll (SPAD)
• Height
72. Spectro-radiometry: Methodology
• Lab-based, background methodology
• Soils
• Soil samples taken along transect
• Reflectance measured with varying moisture content
• Vegetation
• Vegetation samples taken during each field visit
• Measured under artificial light under controlled conditions
73.
74.
75.
76.
77. Diddington transect 1: Spectroradiometry June 2011
0.12
R
e
l 0.1
a
t
i
v 0.08
e
r
0.06
e
f
l
e 0.04
c
t
a
n 0.02
c
e
0
400 500 600 700
Wavelength (nm)
27/06/2011 Archaeology 27/6/2011 Outside archaeology 14/06/2011 Archaeology
14/06/2011 Outside archaeology 08/06/2011 Archaeology 08/06/2011 Outside archaeology
78. Diddington transect 1: Spectroradiometry June 2011
0.4
R
0.35
e
l
a
0.3
t
i
v
0.25
e
r
0.2
e
f
l
0.15
e
c
t
0.1
a
n
c 0.05
e
0
350 450 550 650 750 850 950 1050 1150 1250 1350 1450 1550 1650 1750 1850 1950 2050 2150 2250 2350 2450
Wavelength (nm)
27/06/2011 Archaeology 27/6/2011 Outside archaeology 14/06/2011 Archaeology
14/06/2011 Outside archaeology 08/06/2011 Archaeolgy 08/06/2011 Outside archaeology
Image re-used under a creative commons licence: http://www.flickr.com/photos/irenicrhonda/3468242704Landscape features show up at different scalesThe archaeological record SurficialBuried Depending on scale of examination essentially invisble to the human eye
Traces can be identified through evidence Clusters of artefacts Chemical and physical residues Proxy biological variations Changes in surface relief
Traces can be identified through evidence Clusters of artefacts Chemical and physical residues Proxy biological variations Changes in surface relief
Image re-used under a Creative Commons licence: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikkomiettinen/2587623210At the small scale: The archaeological record can be considered as a more or less continuous spatial distribution of artefacts, structures, organic remains, chemical residues, topographic variations and other less obvious modifications.
Image re-used under a Creative Commons licence: http://www.flickr.com/photos/arenamontanus/8231697At the large scale: The distribution is far from even, with large areas where archaeological remains are widely and infrequently dispersed. There are other areas where materials and other remains are abundant and clustered. It is these peaks of abundance that are commonly referred to as sites.
Image re-used under a Creative Commons licence: http://www.flickr.com/photos/catikaoe/183454010/We identify contrast Between the expression of the remains and the local 'background' value In most scenarios direct contrast measurements are preferable as these measurements will have less attenuation.Proxy contrast measurements are extremely useful when the residue under study does not produce a directly discernable contrast or it exists in a regime where direct observation is impossible
Dependant on localised formation and deformation Localised formation and deformation SchifferHarrisPhysical/chemical structure
Image re-used under a Creative Commons licence: http://www.flickr.com/photos/arpentnourricier/2385863532Dependant on localised formation and deformation Environmental conditions Soil moisture Crop Temperature and emmisivity
Image re-used under a Creative Commons licence: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dartproject/6001577156Dependant on localised formation and deformation Land management
Image re-used under a Creative Commons licence: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dartproject/6001577156Dependant on localised formation and deformation Land management
Satellite approaches should be considered in a multi-sensor environment which includes ground survey and excavationThe point is to learn more about the past
Image re-used under a Creative Commons licence: http://www.flickr.com/photos/southernpixel/3480710493/Not really.We have great techniques but some are in danger of becoming redundant
Image re-used under a Creative Commons licence: http://www.flickr.com/photos/san_drino/1454922072/Environmental processesSensor responses (particularly new sensors)Constraining factors (soil, crops etc.)Bias and spatial variabilityIMPACTS ONDeploymentManagement
Image re-used under a Creative Commons licence: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jimmysmith/720356377/Changes in land management may reduce the appearance of the phenomena we seekUsing science to maximise crop return
Image re-used under a Creative Commons licence: http://www.flickr.com/photos/tangyauhoong/4502062656/Actual crop returns controlled so they approximate towardsthe 'norm'NEW, i.e. not observed before, archaeology is contained within the tailsThese outlier values are being removed.The outlier is an exceptional year ;-)
Most successful archaeological detection technique Low level aerial platform Handheld SLR and digital cameras Reliance on oblique photography Optical and Near Infrared wavelengths Used since early 1900s
Reliant on specific seasonal and environmental conditions Increasingly extreme conditions are required for the detection of ‘new’ sitesLow understanding of the physical processes at play outside the visual wavelengths
Significant bias in its application in the environmental areas where it is productive (for example clay environments tend not to be responsive) Surveys don’t tend to be systematic Interpretation tends to be more art than science
Image re-used under a creative commons licence: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8203774@N06/2310292882/
Image re-used under a Creative Commons licence:How does the object generate an observable contrast to it's local matrix?PhysicalChemicalBiologicaletcAre the contrasts permanent or transitory?
Image re-used under a Creative Commons licence:If transitory why are they occurring?Is it changes in?Soil typeLand managementSoil moistureTemperatureNutrient availabilityCrop typeCrop growth stage
Image re-used under a Creative Commons licence:
Image re-used under a Creative Commons licence: DARTSpatial Resolution You need enough to observe the object
Image re-used under a Creative Commons licence: DARTRadiometric Resolution - You need enough to be able to physically detect the expressed differencesdetermines how finely a system can represent or distinguish differences of intensity is usually expressed as a number of levels or a number of bits for example 8 bits or 256 levels The higher the radiometric resolution, the better subtle differences of intensity or reflectivity can be represented Signal to noise ratios can be a problem Example It is difficult to detect small changes in growth if your ruler only measures to the nearect 10cms You need enough to be able to physically detect the expressed differences
Image re-used under a Creative Commons licence: DARTYou need to know when to look for the difference
Spectral Resolution You need to know what part of the spectrum to detect the expressed difference Unsure of the geophysical metaphor for this
Image re-used under a Creative Commons licence: DARTSo what causes these localised variations?Local conditions structure how any contrast difference is exhibited:Soil typeCrop typeMoistureNutrientsDiurnal temperature variations
Image re-used under a Creative Commons licence: DARTExpressed contrast differences change over timeSeasonal variationscrop phenology (growth)moisturetemperaturenutrientsDiurnal variationssun angle (topographic features)temperature variations
Image re-used under a Creative Commons licence: DARTExacerbated by anthropogenic actionsCroppingIrrigationHarrowing
Image re-used under a Creative Commons licence: DARTBut archaeology doesn't tend to produce spectral signatures Rather: produce localised disruptions to a matrix The nature of these disruptions vary and include: Changes to the soil structure Changes to moisture retention capacity Changes in geochemistry Changes in magnetic or acoustic properties Changes to topography At least one of these disruptions will produce a contrast which is detectable The challenge is What sensor to use The sensitivity of the sensor When to deploy the sensor
Based upon an understanding of:Nature of the archaeological residuesNature of archaeological material (physical and chemical structure)Nature of the surrounding material with which it contrastsHow proxy material (crop) interacts with archaeology and surrounding matrixSensor characteristicsSpatial, spectral, radiometric and temporalHow these can be applied to detect contrastsEnvironmental characteristicsComplex natural and cultural variables that can change rapidly over time
Try to understand the periodicity of changeRequire intensive ground observation (spectro-radiometry, soil and crop analysis) at known sites (and their surroundings) in a range of different environments under different environmental conditions
Image re-used under a creative commons licence:http://www.flickr.com/photos/soilscience/5104676427Spectro-radiometrySoilVegetationEvery 2 weeksCrop phenologyHeightGrowth (tillering)Flash res 64Including induced events
ResistivityGround penetrating radarEmbedded Soil Moisture and Temperature probesLogging every hour Weather stationLogging every half hour
Image reused under a Creative Commons Licence:http://www.flickr.com/photos/kubina/279523019Geotechnical analysesGeochemical analysesPlant Biology
Image reused under a Creative Commons Licence:http://www.flickr.com/photos/kubina/279523019Geotechnical analysesGeochemical analysesPlant Biology
Davis Vantage Pro Weather stationCollects a range of technical data e.g.Wind speedWind directionRainfallTemperatureHumiditySolar RadiationBarometric PressureAnd derivativesWind ChillHeat Index
Image reused under a Creative Commons Licence:http://www.flickr.com/photos/kubina/279523019Geotechnical analysesGeochemical analysesPlant Biology
There appears to be some problems with the recordingUseful tool forScheduling diurnal thermal inertia flightsCalibrating the TDR readings
Key aimsInvestigate the propagation of EM radiation in different soil conditions (e.g. temperature, magnetic permeability, moisture content, density) and identify the difference between archaeological residue and the surrounding soil matrixAttempt to use geotechnical properties (e.g. particle size distribution, moisture content) to predict the geophysical responses of the different EM sensors used in aerial and geophysical workLink the soil properties to local weather and other environmental factors to enable better planning for collection techniques
TDR - How does it workSends a pulse of EM energyDue to changes in impedance, at the start and at the end of the probe, the pulse is reflected back and the reflections can be identified on the waveform traceThe distance between these two reflection points is used to determine the Dielectric permittivity Different soils have different dielectric permittivityThis needs calibrating before soil moisture can be derived from the sensors
Further analysis of permittivity and conductivity against rainfall Linking the changes to the weather patternsComparisons can be made betweenSoils at different depthsArchaeological and non-archaeological featuresDifferent soil types at the different locations
Conversion to moisture content is also a priorityRequires calibration using different mixing models including:empiricalsemi-empiricalphysical volumetric phenomenological modelsThis will help us to link the changes in geophysical responses to the composition of the soil and predict future responses, as well as supporting investigations into crop stress and vigour.
Conversion to moisture content is also a priorityRequires calibration using different mixing models including:empiricalsemi-empiricalphysical volumetric phenomenological modelsThis will help us to link the changes in geophysical responses to the composition of the soil and predict future responses, as well as supporting investigations into crop stress and vigour.
The measured earth resistance of a site will change throughout the year.This is due to many factors which exist in the natural landscape.It is not the broad change of readings we are interested inNot Quantitativebut how the readings within the archaeological feature change compared to the readings of the natural surrounding soilBut Relative
methodology similar to that employed by Parkyn et al. (2011)Overviewdata pointslie within the ditch featureover the non-archaeological featurefind an average data value for the feature and the surrounding soilThe percentage difference between these two figures can then be considered the amount of contrast within the test area.The higher the percentage, the better the feature is able to be defined.
Conversion to moisture content is also a priorityRequires calibration using different mixing models including:empiricalsemi-empiricalphysical volumetric phenomenological modelsThis will help us to link the changes in geophysical responses to the composition of the soil and predict future responses, as well as supporting investigations into crop stress and vigour.
Conversion to moisture content is also a priorityRequires calibration using different mixing models including:empiricalsemi-empiricalphysical volumetric phenomenological modelsThis will help us to link the changes in geophysical responses to the composition of the soil and predict future responses, as well as supporting investigations into crop stress and vigour.
The graph below shows the calculated z-values from the selected points inside the ditch and from the chosen ‘background’ response when compared to the entire dataset. This is a useful analysis of how the chosen ditch and background samples compare to all the collected points and shows that the ditch is always over 1.25 standard deviations below the mean of the dataset as a whole.