Keynote (Johan Andersson) - Mantle for Developers - by Johan Andersson, Technical Director, DICE/Electronic Arts
•
1 j'aime•12,468 vues
Keynote, Mantle for Developers, by Johan Andersson, Technical Director, DICE/Electronic Arts, at the AMD Developer Summit (APU13), Nov. 11-13, 2013.
Recommandé
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Tendances
Tendances (20)
Similaire à Keynote (Johan Andersson) - Mantle for Developers - by Johan Andersson, Technical Director, DICE/Electronic Arts
Similaire à Keynote (Johan Andersson) - Mantle for Developers - by Johan Andersson, Technical Director, DICE/Electronic Arts (20)
Plus de AMD Developer Central
Plus de AMD Developer Central (20)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
Keynote (Johan Andersson) - Mantle for Developers - by Johan Andersson, Technical Director, DICE/Electronic Arts
- 1. MANTLE FOR DEVELOPERS JOHAN ANDERSSON – TECHNICAL DIRECTOR FROSTBITE ELECTRONIC ARTS
- 2. Mantle? Simplify advanced development Improve performance Enable developers to innovate Challenge the status quo
- 4. Developer impact areas Control CPU performance Programmability GPU performance Platforms
- 5. Control New model Traditional Model: Black Box Explicit Model: Mantle Middle-ground abstraction – compromise between performance & “usability” Thin low-level abstraction to expose how hardware works Hidden resource memory & state App explicit memory management Resource CPU access tied to device context Resources are globally accessible Driver analyzes & synchronizes implicitly App explicit resource state transitions
- 6. Control App responsibility Tell when render target will be used as a texture ‒ And many more resource state transitions Don’t destroy resources that GPU is using ‒ Keep track with fences or frames Manual dynamic resource renaming ‒ No DISCARD for driver resource renaming Resource memory tiling Powerful validation layer will help!
- 7. Control Explicit control enables App high-level decisions & optimizations ‒ Has full scene information ‒ Easier to optimize performance & memory Flexible & efficient memory management ‒ Linear frame allocators ‒ Memory pools ‒ Pinned memory Reduced development time ‒ For advanced game engines & apps ‒ Easier to get to target performance & robustness
- 8. Control Explicit control enables Transient resources ‒ Alias render targets within frame ‒ Major memory savings ‒ No need to pre-allocate everything Light-weight driver ‒ Easier to develop & maintain ‒ Reduced CPU draw call overhead
- 10. CPU perf Core concepts Descriptor sets Monolithic pipelines Command buffers
- 11. CPU perf Descriptor sets Table with resource references to bind to graphics or compute pipeline Image Memory Sampler Link Replaces traditional resource stage binding ‒ Major performance & flexibility advantage ‒ Closer to how the hardware works Example 1: Single simple dynamic descriptor set ‒ Bind everything you need for a single draw call ‒ Close to DX/GL model but share between stages Dynamic descriptor set VertexBuffer (VS) Texture0 (VS+PS) Constants (VS) Texture1 (PS) App managed - lots of strategies possible! ‒ Tiny vs huge sets ‒ Single vs multiple ‒ Static vs semi-static vs dynamic Texture2 (PS) Sampler0 (VS+PS)
- 12. CPU perf Descriptor sets Table with resource references to bind to graphics or compute pipeline Image Link ‒ Reduce update time & memory usage Memory Sampler Example 2: Reuse static set with nesting Replaces traditional resource stage binding ‒ Major performance & flexibility advantage ‒ Closer to how the hardware works App managed - lots of strategies possible! ‒ Tiny vs huge sets ‒ Single vs multiple ‒ Static vs semi-static vs dynamic Static descriptor set Dynamic descriptor set Constants (VS) Link VertexBuffer (VS) Texture0 (VS+PS) Texture1 (PS) Texture2 (PS) Texture3 (PS) Texture4 (PS) Sampler0 (VS+PS) Sampler1 (PS)
- 13. CPU perf Monolithic pipelines Shader stages & select graphics state combined into single object ‒ No runtime compilation or patching needed! ‒ Significantly less runtime overhead to use Pipeline state Supports parallel building & caching ‒ Fast loading times Usage & management up to the app ‒ Static vs dynamic creation ‒ Amount of pipelines ‒ State usage IA VS HS DS Tessellator GS RS PS DB CB
- 14. CPU perf Command buffers Issue pipelined graphics & compute commands into a command buffer ‒ Bind graphics state, descriptor sets, pipeline ‒ Draw calls ‒ Render targets ‒ Clears ‒ Memory transfers ‒ NOT: resource mapping Fully independent objects ‒ Create multiple every frame ‒ Or pre-build up front and reuse
- 15. CPU perf CPU 0 CPU 1 CPU 2 DX/GL parallelism Game Game Game Render Render Driver Render Automatically extracts parallelism out of most apps Doesn’t scale beyond 2-3 cores Additional latency Driver thread often bottleneck – can collide app threads Render
- 16. CPU perf Parallel dispatch with Mantle CPU 0 Game Game Game CPU 1 Render Render Render CPU 2 Render Render Render CPU 3 Render Render Render CPU 4 Render Render Render App can go fully wide with its rendering – minimal latency Close to linear scaling with CPU cores No driver threads – no overhead – no contention Frostbite’s approach on all consoles – and on PC with Mantle!
- 18. GPU perf GPU optimizations Thanks to improved CPU performance – CPU will rarely be a bottleneck for the GPU ‒ CPU could help GPU more: ‒ Less brute force rendering ‒ Improve culling Resource states ‒ Gives driver a lot more knowledge & flexibility ‒ Apps can avoid expensive/redundant transitions, such as surface decompression Expose existing GPU functionality Shader pipeline object – driver optimizations ‒ Can optimize with pipeline state knowledge ‒ Can optimize across all shader stages ‒ Quad & Rect-lists ‒ HW-specific MSAA & depth data access ‒ Programmable sample patterns ‒ And more..
- 19. GPU perf Queues Modern GPUs are heterogeneous machines with multiple engines Graphics ‒ Graphics pipeline ‒ Compute pipeline(s) ‒ DMA transfer ‒ Video encode/decode ‒ More… Mantle exposes queues for the engines + synchronization primitives Compute DMA ... Queues GPU
- 21. GPU perf Queue use cases Async DMA transfers ‒ Copy resources in parallel with graphics or compute Copy DMA Graphics Render Other render Use copy
- 22. GPU perf Queue use cases Async DMA transfers ‒ Copy resources in parallel with graphics or compute Async compute together with graphics ‒ ALU heavy compute work at the same time as memory/ROP bound work to utilize idle units Compute Graphics GBuffer Non-shadowed lighting Shadowmap 0 Shadowmap 1 Final lighting
- 23. GPU perf Queue use cases Async DMA transfers Multiple compute kernels collaborating ‒ Copy resources in parallel with graphics or compute ‒ Can be faster than über-kernel ‒ Example: Compute geometry backend & compute rasterizer Async compute together with graphics ‒ ALU heavy compute work at the same time as memory/ROP bound work to utilize idle units Compute 0 Compute 1 Graphics Compute Geometry Compute Rasterizer Ordinary Rendering
- 24. GPU perf Queue use cases Async DMA transfers Multiple compute kernels collaborating ‒ Copy resources in parallel with graphics or compute Async compute together with graphics ‒ ALU heavy compute work at the same time as memory/ROP bound work to utilize idle units Compute Graphics ‒ Can be faster than über-kernel ‒ Example: Compute geometry backend & compute rasterizer Compute as frontend for graphics pipeline ‒ Compute runs asynchronously ahead and prepares & optimizes geometry for graphics pipeline Game Process1 large GPU Process0 engines will buildProcess0 job graphs ‒ Move away from single sequential submission Draw0 ‒ Just as we already have doneDraw1 on CPU Draw2
- 26. Programmability Explicit Multi-GPU Explicit control of GPU queues and synchronization, finally! ‒ Implement your own Alternate-Frame-Rendering ‒ Or something more exotic.. Use case: Workstation rendering with 4-8 GPUs ‒ Super high-quality rendering & simulation ‒ Load balance graphics & compute job graphs across GPUs ‒ 20-40 TFlops in a single machine! Use case: Low-latency rendering ‒ Important for VR and competitive games ‒ Latency optimized GPU job graph scheduling ‒ VR: Simultaneously drive 2 GPUs (1 per eye)
- 27. Programmability New mechanisms Command buffer predication & flow control ‒ GPU affecting/skipping submitted commands ‒ Go beyond DrawIndirect / DispatchIndirect ‒ Advanced variable workloads ‒ Advanced culling optimizations Write occlusion query results into GPU buffer ‒ No CPU roundtrip needed ‒ Can drive predicated rendering ‒ Or use results directly in shaders (lens flares)
- 28. Programmability Bindless resources Mantle supports bindless resources ‒ Shaders can select resources to use instead of static binding from CPU ‒ Extension of the descriptor set support Examples ‒ Performance optimizations – less data to update ‒ Logic & data structures that live fully on the GPU ‒ Scene culling & rendering ‒ Material representations Key component that will open up a lot of opportunities! ‒ Deferred shading ‒ Raytracing
- 30. Platforms Today Mantle gives us strong benefits on Windows today ‒ Console-like performance & programmability on both Windows 7 and Windows 8 ‒ For us, well worth the dev time! DX & GL are the industry standards ‒ Needed for platforms that do not support Mantle ‒ Needed by devs who do not want/need more control ‒ Have to have fallback paths for GL/DX, but not limit oneself to it Mantle and PlayStation 4 will drive our future Frostbite designs & optimizations ‒ PS4 graphics API has great programmability & performance as well ‒ Share concepts, methods & optimization strategies
- 31. Platforms Linux & Mac Want to see Mantle on Linux and Mac! ‒ Would enable support for our full engine & rendering ‒ Significantly easier to do efficient renderer with Mantle than with OpenGL Use cases: ‒ Workstations ‒ R&D ‒ Not limited by WDDM ‒ Games ‒ Mantle + SteamOS = powerful combination!
- 32. Platforms Mobile Mobile architectures are getting closer in capabilities to desktop GPUs Want graphics API that allows apps to fully utilize the hardware ‒ Power efficient ‒ High performance ‒ Programmable Major opportunity with Mantle – leap frog GL4, DX11 ‒ For mobile SoC vendors ‒ For Google and Apple
- 33. Platforms Multi-vendor? Mantle is designed to be a thin hardware abstraction ‒ Not tied to AMD’s GCN architecture ‒ Forward compatible ‒ Extensions for architecture- and platform-specific functionality Mantle would be a much more efficient graphics API for other vendors as well ‒ Most Mantle functionality can be supported on today’s modern GPUs Want to see future version of Mantle supported on all platforms and on all modern GPUs! ‒ Become an active industry standard with IHVs and ISVs collaborating ‒ Enable us developers to innovate with great performance & programmability everywhere
- 34. Platforms
- 35. Frostbite Battlefield 4 Mantle support is in development ‒ Core renderer (closer to PS4 than DX11) ‒ Implement all rendering techniques used in BF4 (many!) ‒ CPU optimizations (parallel dispatch, descriptor sets) ‒ GPU optimizations (minimize transitions, MSAA) ‒ R&D for advanced GPU optimizations ‒ Memory management ‒ Multi-GPU support ‒ ~2 months of work Update targeting late December
- 36. Frostbite Plants vs Zombies: Garden Warfare Very different rendering compared to BF4 Frostbite Mantle renderer will work out of the box Focus on APU performance
- 37. Frostbite Future All Frostbite games designed with Mantle ‒ 15 games in development across all of EA Advanced Mantle rendering & use cases ‒ Lots of exciting R&D opportunities! Want multi-vendor & multi-platform support!