Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Nous utilisons votre profil LinkedIn et vos données d’activité pour vous proposer des publicités personnalisées et pertinentes. Vous pouvez changer vos préférences de publicités à tout moment.
Pitfalls of (post)
Covid-19
education: time for
a critical reflection
DR HANNA TERÄS
PRINCIPAL LECTURER
TAMPERE UNIVERSITY...
Digitalization (and des
Pudels Kern)
”Everyone knows what digitalization is” – or do they?
”There is a need for a digital ...
Digitalization
escapes
definitions
Digitization: converting analogue
signals into digital, computer-
readable signals.
Dig...
Digitalization of education
Kuvat: Anders Sandberg CC BY-NC 2.0 & Antti T. Nissinen CC BY 2.0
We tend to actually talk abo...
Endless potential
”The ENORMOUS potential of digitalization is always waiting just
behind the corner.
Innovation = always ...
Ed-tech speech
Digital technologies revolutionizing learning! Since A.D. X. (Koch,
1973; Postman, 1992)
”Education is brok...
Teachers and
digitalization?
Research focuses largely on digital
skills or technology acceptance.
(esim. Schrerer ym. 2019...
Educational policy (with
”own cow in the ditch”)
The future of education is influenced by vision papers and
programs that ...
The ”joys” of datafication
Data has become a significant currency -> more data is
better! So everyone is obsessed with get...
Agenda for critical studies in
digitalization of education
1. A step out of the ”digital box”, space and
time for critical...
Thank you!
hanna.teras@tuni.fi
https://research.tuni.fi/carde/
“Freedom is measured by the
amount of control you have over...
Bayne, S. (2015). What’sthematterwith‘technology-enhanced learning’?Learning, Media and Technology,40(1), 5–20
Birch, K., ...
Prochain SlideShare
Chargement dans…5
×

Pitfalls of (post) COVID-19 education: time for a critical reflection by Hannah Teras [EMPOWER COVID-19 webinar week, day 2]

Pitfalls of (post) COVID-19 education: time for a critical reflection by Hannah Teras [EMPOWER COVID-19 webinar week, day 2]

  • Soyez le premier à commenter

  • Soyez le premier à aimer ceci

Pitfalls of (post) COVID-19 education: time for a critical reflection by Hannah Teras [EMPOWER COVID-19 webinar week, day 2]

  1. 1. Pitfalls of (post) Covid-19 education: time for a critical reflection DR HANNA TERÄS PRINCIPAL LECTURER TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES
  2. 2. Digitalization (and des Pudels Kern) ”Everyone knows what digitalization is” – or do they? ”There is a need for a digital leap because education must not be left behind as the world changes and digitalizes”(Olli-Pekka Heinonen, 2016) Digitalization is important because digitalization is important? Image: Deb Watson CC BY-NC 2.0
  3. 3. Digitalization escapes definitions Digitization: converting analogue signals into digital, computer- readable signals. Digitalization: changes social structures. (Brennen & Kreiss, 2014) Kuva: MajorMalfunction CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
  4. 4. Digitalization of education Kuvat: Anders Sandberg CC BY-NC 2.0 & Antti T. Nissinen CC BY 2.0 We tend to actually talk about digitization and let the social change go unnoticed.
  5. 5. Endless potential ”The ENORMOUS potential of digitalization is always waiting just behind the corner. Innovation = always good? Research: So far very little evidence of benefits, a gap between the potential and reality (Cuban & Jandric, 2015, Selwyn 2010, Mertala 2019) Digital environments redefine, simplify and reduce learning, no space for critical evaluation (Bayne, 2015, Mertala, 2019, Knox et al. 2020). Techno-scientific innovation has not solved societal problems, sometimes quite the opposite. Innovations often benefit edtech companies themselves. (Birch et al. 2020) Kuva: Jeff Sullivan. CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
  6. 6. Ed-tech speech Digital technologies revolutionizing learning! Since A.D. X. (Koch, 1973; Postman, 1992) ”Education is broken, technology will fix it”. (Williamson 2020, Birch et al. 2020, Mertala, 2019) Ed-tech speech is characterized by value-laden, political and deterministic language that leaves no room for alternative interpretations or doubt. (Mertala, 2019, s. 27) Closed universe of discourse: commenting only within a strictly defined space (Teräs, Suoranta & Teräs, 2022) Kuva: Robert Ball. CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
  7. 7. Teachers and digitalization? Research focuses largely on digital skills or technology acceptance. (esim. Schrerer ym. 2019, Falloon 2020). Teachers are given the role of objects for professional development programs (Teräs, Teräs & Suoranta) -> Digitalization becomes the subject, it is something that happens to teachers Kuva: Cynthia Blue. CC BY-NC-ND
  8. 8. Educational policy (with ”own cow in the ditch”) The future of education is influenced by vision papers and programs that assume a certain kind of future that requires certain changes in case we wish to adapt to it. Thus they actually construct a future instead of just predicting it, they become self-fulfilling prophesies. OECD recommendations and conclusions are not based on research knowledge, but on the blogs and vision papers of consulting companies, Silicon Valley edtech companies, ”techno-evangelists” and the like – togehter with earlier OECD reports. The thoughts of those who benefit financially are heard like the words of prophets. Kuva: Jim Howard. CC BY-NC 2.0
  9. 9. The ”joys” of datafication Data has become a significant currency -> more data is better! So everyone is obsessed with getting as much data from as many sources as possible. Everyone must consent in the name of ”better education”. (Couldry & Yu, 2018) The main motivation behind the development of different learning platforms and datafication is NOT better learning, but heftier profit. (see Williamson 2020, Mirrlees & Alvi 2020) Threats: machine behaviorism, algorithm pedagogy, surveillance capitalism (Knox et al. 2020, Birch et al. 2020, Zuboff, 2019)
  10. 10. Agenda for critical studies in digitalization of education 1. A step out of the ”digital box”, space and time for critical reflection. Where are we now, where do we want to go? 2. Critical pedagogy and critical theory offer useful tools for the research and development of digitalization. 3. Emancipation and engagement of teachers in defining and creating desired digital futures!
  11. 11. Thank you! hanna.teras@tuni.fi https://research.tuni.fi/carde/ “Freedom is measured by the amount of control you have over the things upon which you are dependent.” ― C. Wright Mills
  12. 12. Bayne, S. (2015). What’sthematterwith‘technology-enhanced learning’?Learning, Media and Technology,40(1), 5–20 Birch, K., Chiappetta, M., & Artyushina, A. (2020). The problem of innovation in technoscientific capitalism:data rentiership and the policy implications of turning personal digital data into a private asset.PolicyStudies,1–20.https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2020.1748264 Brennen, S. & Kreiss, D. (2014). Digitalization and Digitization. Culture Digitally, September 8 2014. Available at: https://culturedigitally.org/2014/09/digitalization-and- digitization/ Couldry, N., & Yu, J. (2018). Deconstructing datafication’s brave new world.New Media & Society, 20(12),4473–4491.https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818775968. Cuban, L., & Jandrić, P. (2015). The dubious promise of educational technologies: Historical patterns andfuture challenges.E-Learning and Digital Media, 12(3–4), 425– 439.https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753015579978 Knox, J., Williamson, B., & Bayne, S. (2020). Machine behaviourism: Future visions of‘learnification’and‘datafication’across humans and digital technologies.Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 31–45.https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1623251 Mertala, P. (2019). Paradoxes of participation in the digitalization of education: A narrative account.Learning,Media and Technology, 45(2), 1– 14.https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1696362. Mirrlees, T., & Alvi, S. (2020).EDTECH INC. Selling, automating and globalizing higher education in thedigital age. New York & London: Routledge. OAJ. 2016. Askelmerkit digiloikkaan. OAJ:n julkaisusarja. Postman, N. (1992).Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology.NewYork:AlfredA.Knopf,Inc. Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65–73 Teräs, M., Suoranta, J., Teräs, H., & Curcher, M. (2020) Post-Covid-19 Education and Education Technology 'Solutionism': a Seller's Market. Postdigital Science and Education 2(1). Williamson, B. (2020a). Making markets through digital platforms: Pearson, edu-business, and the(e)valuation of higher education.Critical Studies in Education.https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1737556. Zuboff, S. (2019).The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier ofpower. London: PublicAffairs.Postdigital Science and Education

×