6. Vem är universiteten till för?
Redan idag är 4
av 10 studenter
äldre än 25
5 av 10 tvååringar använder idag
Internet varje dag…
cc licensed ( BY NC SA ) flickr photo shared by courosa
9. UNESCO defined OER as material used to support education
that may be freely accessed, reused, modified and shared by
anyone (2011/07/14).
The phenomenon of OER is an empowerment process, facilitated by
technology in which various types of stakeholders are able to interact,
collaborate, create, and use materials and pedagogic practices, that are
freely available, for enhancing access, reducing costs, and improving the
quality of education and learning at all levels (Kanwar, Balasubramanian &
Umar 2010).
13. OER University
Who we are
The Open Educational
Resource (OER)
university is a virtual
collaboration of like-
minded institutions
committed to creating
flexible pathways for OER
learners to gain formal
academic credit
18. Jag är den som väljer…vad betyder det i
fråga om kvalitetsutveckling
19. Rethinking och transformation
From Sage on the stage…To Guide on the
side…To Meddler in the middle
Frågan är INTE hur vi ska arbeta
med digitala medier/teknik i utbildning
utan snarare hur vi kan arbeta med
lärande i en digital värld/community
Från innehåll till sammanhang
content to context
23. Ossiannilsson E & Landgren L (2011). Essential areas that
benchmarking e-learning ought to cover. Reprinted with permission
from Wiley-Blackwell.
24. Om att byta kvalitetsperspektiv
Nätverkande
Hållbarhet
Gränslös utbildning
Livslångt lärande
Helhet och konceptuellt
synsätt och “beyond”
Globalisation
Från min/mitt till alla…
Demografi
Teknisk och digital
utveckling
Individualisering
Kvalitet
”Harnessing new
media”
Referensram
Benchlearning…
(Ossiannilsson 2012)
25. Om att ändra perspektiv
Juridik
Organisation
Pedagogik
Technik
Ekonomi
Business plan
Attityder, Möjligheter,
Kultur. Perspektiv cc hejemmisen.se/?cat=8
26. Kvalitet– en dialektisk ansats
CC BY Some rights reserved by SeattleClouds.com
Kvalitetssäkring
Processmodeller
Riktlinjer
Regler
Standards
Competeser
Attityder
Värderingar
Själv-evaluation
Kommunikation
Förtroende
Samarbete
Inkluderande
Innovation/Kreativitet
CC BY Some rights reserved by Gerd Altmann
32. The benchmarking process
The locus of
benchmarking lies
between the current
and desirable states
of affairs and
contributes to the
transformation
process that
realizes these
improvements.
What to
benchmark
Benchmarking
team
Benchmarking
partners
Analyse
benchmarking
information
Take action
Ossiannilsson 2011. Reprinted with permission from SCIRP
33. Benchmarking benefits and values
• Self assess institutions
• Better understand the
process
• Measure and compare
• Discover new ideas
• Obtain data to support
decision making
• Targets for
improvements
• Strengthen identity,
strategy, implementation
• Enhance reputation
• Respond to international
and national indicators
• New standard for the
sector
Van Vught, F. (2008)
A practical guide. Benchmarking in
European Higher Education
34. New benefits identified, old ones
confirmed
Attitudes
Collaboration
Committment
Cultural issues
Internal dialogue/processes
Involvement
Management
Critical reflections
Teambuilding
Transparency
Trust
Ossiannilsson 2012
35.
36.
37. Drivkrafter - kvalitet
Branding /instant reputation
Digitalisering
Tekniska innovationer
Internationalisering
Samarbete för konkurrens
Social innovation
Strategiska partnerskap
“Learn on the go”
38. Utmaningar - Vill vi? Kan vi? Gör vi?
…Give each one of us the
possibilities to reach the
potentials each of us are
aimed for..
Kvalitet
Lärande
Globalt medborgarskap
…att erbjuda öppen
utbildning och digitalt lärande
tillgängligt och strategiskt
40. What it all means
There can be no doubt that HE is the key to a
well-qualified workforce. And a well-qualified
workforce makes for a stronger, productive
economy. But it all starts with access. If
students are still forced to operate in ancient
educational model, how can they be expected
to participate successfully in the modern
market and society.
41. En fråga om kvalitet och social innovation
Ossiannilsson (2012) Benchmarking
(e)-learning in higher education,
Doctoral dissertation, Oulu University,
Finland
I am Ebba Ossiannilsson, Lund University, Sweden
I recently, dec 2012 earned my PhD from Oulu University in Finland and I did it through distance
I work for several international and national organisations on open learning and quality and some of them are represented here by their logos
I will here especially emphazise the work on the Paris declaration by UNESCO, the work with OER Service and the MOOC quality project. I also use to serve as a reviewer for several organisations, such as EFQUEL and Epprobate.
I have been asked to talk about the topic I am happy to share this with you today
Who are we planning the education for
Mainly for the young generation
Mainly classrooms based
Mainly traditional
§
Vad betyder så varje bokstav
Massive =att det är för många, väldigt många
Open = öppen i vidaste mening, i stort sett enbart ngn devise o Internet
Online = online inga fysiska möten alls
Course = att det är en kurs, vanligtvis veckomoduler
Vidare att MOOCen är autonom, mångfaldig, öppen och interaktiv
Autonomy, Diversity, Openess, Interactivity
Jfr Downes blogpost
cMOOC community basearat, man bygger gemenasmt kursen allteftersom
xMOOC innehållsbaserad
Open Badges
Såvida det inte är arbetsgivaren som ger sk Open Badges, som jag nämnde nyss, vilket redan är vanligt förekommande. I landet väster över…
===================================
Taxonomi 8 varianter Clark (2013)
transferMOOCs
madeMOOCs
synchMOOCs
asynchMOOCs
adaptiveMOOCs
groupMOOCs
connectivistMOOCS
miniMOOCSs
Note that these are not mutually exclusive categories, as one can have a transfer MOOC that is synchronous or asynchronous. What’s important here is that we see MOOCs as informing the debate around learning to get over the obvious problems of relevance, access and cost. This is by no means a definitive taxonomy but it’s a start. I’d really appreciate any comments, critiques or new categories.
The third theme is about quality
A move from the paradigm my students, my course, my content..
towards
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-rcFBgUNtQ0/SFO-eE5igTI/AAAAAAAAEIk/4cyVccxKt_U/s400/GMU+service-learning+orientation+037.jpg
http://umami.typepad.com/umami/images/2007/07/18/p7050954.jpg
http://s3.frank.itlab.us/photo-essays/small/aug_05_4646_teacher.jpg
Quality can enhance when use the very best of what is out there and available and often for free and peer reviewed
In research we are used to talk about peer review, but not that often in education
Towards any university, any content, any student
Probably the role of the University will shift to an assessing and credentialling institution or just for elite students and for research
http://img.scoop.it/_kg6c2d18VvkH-C1_rudTzl72eJkfbmt4t8yenImKBVaiQDB_Rd1H6kmuBWtceBJ
Learning on the go
24/7/365
Kvalitetsindikatorer som brukar framhävas
Närvaro
Transperens
Delaktighet
Självbestämmande
Flexibilitet, tid/rum/plats/fart
Interaktivitet
Tillgänglighet
Individualisering
Design
Examination
Quality is a concept not very easy to define or measure
Culture differences
Devices
Needs
Media
Affordance
... Whats in it for me
Retrospective or prospective quality…
Certification
Accreditation
Quality assurance
From control to quality
enhancement
Self-evaluation
Peer review
Benchmarking
Som international certifiation /accreditation organisation
As to mention some examples I will especially focus on epprobate, unique and Excellence
The direction of a transformation can be initiated both ways: Top-down and bottom-up
Academic middle managers “face the challenge of functioning at the interface between the university’s central administration and the faculties and departments where the rubber of the new marketized and strategic research environment meets the road of daily academic life” [Boyko, 2008].
The trick. It is not about doing everything alone but about facilitating actors from both top-down and bottom-up. And this can indeed be done by the middle management - but a guideline is needed.
A general conceptual model of organizational change in higher education institutions, called “Transtitution Maturity Model (TMM)”, has been developed.
The TMM is based on the assumption that an organization gradually develops higher levels of maturity in its culture, its resources and its practices, starting with external instruction to be able to apply the knowledge transmission.
The second stage (application) adds practical experiences to the theoretical instruction.
In a third stage, based on the theoretical knowledge and practical experiences, it is possible to share the own insights with a community.
On the last level, it is envisaged to become a benchmark that inspires others to learn from the own example
Why does it work? Because it is holistic and it is not condensing the work at one point but distributing it, whilst the middle management is in the facilitator role.
.. Explore the opportunities (strength and weeknesses) for making open ed and digital learning more affordable and strategic
…strategically aims and possible target groups
… policy for Lund University
…connect to ongoing international initiatives.
…tools, support, infrastructure
…
Faculty Doesn't Know what To Do with OER
Not Everyone Trusts Free Resources
Expectations Around OER Quality are Extremely High
Institutional Processes Aren't Always Flexible
There Is no Effective Discovery and Assessment Tool for OER
Internationellt har begreppet MOOC , Massive pen Online Courses) uppmärksammats allt mer inte minst i media. En del lärosäten även i Sverige har åtminstone börjat fundera på att engagera sig i MOOC rörelsen.
Jag menar att MOOC , dvs tillgång till öppet lärande för alla är en demokratisk rättighet och kan ses som en social innovation.
Jag menar också att öppen utbildningskultur främjar kvalitet för lärande, utbildning och forskning. Det är också vad min avhandling och forskning handlar om
As my strong believe caring is sharing
So my footprints and contact details
My slides are available at slidshare where you can find my other presentations as well