SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  1
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
5 Common Debt Buyer Lawsuit Defenses
In an earlier slide share presentation, I
discussed Common Defenses to a Credit
Card Lawsuit and focused on those cases
filed by an original creditor.
Here, we are dealing with 5 Common Debt
Buyers Lawsuit Defenses such as those
filed by Portfolio Recovery Associates,
Midland Funding, Cavalry Portfolio Services
or Cavalry SPV I, Unifund CCR, LVNV
Funding and others. These are situations
where the original credit card company sold
the account to a 3rd party who moved
forward with a lawsuit on the debt.
Original Creditors
Each of the defenses discussed in the original slide share also apply to debt buyers.
The same consent orders entered by the original creditor are also relevant as to the
balance owed when the account is sold. Additionally, the inconsistencies in the credit
card statements and contract amendments can help dispute the alleged
lawsuit. Counterclaims are discussed at greater length below because of the
application of the FDCPA, but payment plans can still be an option, if necessary, in a
debt buyer lawsuit.
Standing
Many answers to a lawsuit allege that the “Plaintiff lacks standing” as an affirmative
defense, but what does that mean? At its most basic, the argument is that the debt
buyer does not own the account or can’t prove that it owns the account. Often times, the
only evidence that the debt buyer owns your account is a photocopied “Bill of Sale” or
“Assignment” that does not reference your individual account in any manner. As an
essential element of a collection lawsuit, the debt buyer needs to be able prove
ownership of the debt.
Admissibility of Evidence
With the appropriate objection, it is difficult for debt buyers to admit the documentation
obtained from the original creditor. A witness from the original creditor is rarely
available to establish the authenticity and reliability of the credit card statements,
if available at all. As the debt buyer’s witness likely does not have personal knowledge
of the record keeping practices of the original creditor and considering the limitations in
the transfer of the actual accounts, the Court can deny the admission of the
documentation into evidence. Without the documentation in evidence, the debt buyer
cannot prove its case.
Conditions Precedent
Another common affirmative defense in Florida is the “Failure to satisfy a condition
precedent”. Florida law requires a debt buyer to provide notice that they purchased an
account prior to filing a lawsuit. This is known as a condition precedent and must be
established at trial if at issue. In pertinent part, Fla. Stat. § 559.715 states, “…the
assignee must give the debtor written notice of such assignment as soon as practical
after the assignment is made, but at least 30 days before any action to collect the debt.”
Counterclaims
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) applies only to 3rd party debt collectors
and covers many of the same debt collection violations as the FCCPA such as threats
of violence, harassing collection calls, and other unfair collection actions. The FDCPA
provides additional damages that can be used in addition to the FCCPA to offset the
balance alleged in the debt buyer lawsuit or to recover damages.
Conclusion
Depending on the unique facts of each debt buyer lawsuit and your personal financial
situation, there may be additional defenses available; however, this is a quick list of 5
Common Debt Buyer Lawsuit Defenses. In addition to each of the defenses in the
original creditor lawsuit article, debt buyer lawsuit defenses include standing, limited
admissibility of documents, conditions precedent, and additional damages under the
FDCPA. If served or threatened with a credit card lawsuit by a debt buyer, please call
Florida Credit Card Defense Lawyer Scott Florin at Florin Legal, P.A. at (813)449-4287
or request a free consultation.

Contenu connexe

En vedette

HB over view with pictures_sept_15_jp_with Midlo and SSC
HB over view with pictures_sept_15_jp_with Midlo and SSCHB over view with pictures_sept_15_jp_with Midlo and SSC
HB over view with pictures_sept_15_jp_with Midlo and SSC
Julia Plumb
 
V-Care Introduction (3)
V-Care Introduction (3)V-Care Introduction (3)
V-Care Introduction (3)
Yujie Lang
 
Tink’s Indoor Recreation, LLC
Tink’s Indoor Recreation, LLCTink’s Indoor Recreation, LLC
Tink’s Indoor Recreation, LLC
Daniel Tincknell
 

En vedette (11)

Designing The Listening Experience
Designing The Listening ExperienceDesigning The Listening Experience
Designing The Listening Experience
 
Elektrozylinder de/en
Elektrozylinder de/enElektrozylinder de/en
Elektrozylinder de/en
 
Wartungs- und Bedienungsanleitung Elektrozylinder de/en
Wartungs- und Bedienungsanleitung Elektrozylinder de/enWartungs- und Bedienungsanleitung Elektrozylinder de/en
Wartungs- und Bedienungsanleitung Elektrozylinder de/en
 
Abeer sterilization
Abeer sterilizationAbeer sterilization
Abeer sterilization
 
Primary 4th level students presentation
Primary 4th level students presentationPrimary 4th level students presentation
Primary 4th level students presentation
 
Descolonização da Ásia e da África
Descolonização da Ásia e da África Descolonização da Ásia e da África
Descolonização da Ásia e da África
 
HB over view with pictures_sept_15_jp_with Midlo and SSC
HB over view with pictures_sept_15_jp_with Midlo and SSCHB over view with pictures_sept_15_jp_with Midlo and SSC
HB over view with pictures_sept_15_jp_with Midlo and SSC
 
Stellantrieb de/en
Stellantrieb de/enStellantrieb de/en
Stellantrieb de/en
 
V-Care Introduction (3)
V-Care Introduction (3)V-Care Introduction (3)
V-Care Introduction (3)
 
Betriebs- und Wartungsanleitung HMC-Serie Gurundausführung de/en
Betriebs- und Wartungsanleitung HMC-Serie Gurundausführung de/enBetriebs- und Wartungsanleitung HMC-Serie Gurundausführung de/en
Betriebs- und Wartungsanleitung HMC-Serie Gurundausführung de/en
 
Tink’s Indoor Recreation, LLC
Tink’s Indoor Recreation, LLCTink’s Indoor Recreation, LLC
Tink’s Indoor Recreation, LLC
 

Dernier

Crime Detection/Prevention and Narco-Analysis Test
Crime Detection/Prevention and Narco-Analysis TestCrime Detection/Prevention and Narco-Analysis Test
Crime Detection/Prevention and Narco-Analysis Test
AJAYPRATAPSINGHTOMAR2
 

Dernier (20)

Crime Detection/Prevention and Narco-Analysis Test
Crime Detection/Prevention and Narco-Analysis TestCrime Detection/Prevention and Narco-Analysis Test
Crime Detection/Prevention and Narco-Analysis Test
 
Rights of Consumers under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Rights of Consumers under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.Rights of Consumers under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Rights of Consumers under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
 
IRDA role in Insurance sector in India .pptx
IRDA role in Insurance sector in India .pptxIRDA role in Insurance sector in India .pptx
IRDA role in Insurance sector in India .pptx
 
Indian Partnership Act 1932, Rights and Duties of Partners
Indian Partnership Act 1932, Rights and Duties of PartnersIndian Partnership Act 1932, Rights and Duties of Partners
Indian Partnership Act 1932, Rights and Duties of Partners
 
Embed-6 (1).pdfc p;p;kdk[odk[drskpokpopo
Embed-6 (1).pdfc p;p;kdk[odk[drskpokpopoEmbed-6 (1).pdfc p;p;kdk[odk[drskpokpopo
Embed-6 (1).pdfc p;p;kdk[odk[drskpokpopo
 
Embed-1-1.pdfohediooieoiehohoiefoloeohefoi
Embed-1-1.pdfohediooieoiehohoiefoloeohefoiEmbed-1-1.pdfohediooieoiehohoiefoloeohefoi
Embed-1-1.pdfohediooieoiehohoiefoloeohefoi
 
Does Apple Neurotechnology Patents Go To Far?
Does Apple  Neurotechnology Patents Go To Far?Does Apple  Neurotechnology Patents Go To Far?
Does Apple Neurotechnology Patents Go To Far?
 
HOW LAW FIRMS CAN SUPPORT MILITARY DIVORCE CASES
HOW LAW FIRMS CAN SUPPORT MILITARY DIVORCE CASESHOW LAW FIRMS CAN SUPPORT MILITARY DIVORCE CASES
HOW LAW FIRMS CAN SUPPORT MILITARY DIVORCE CASES
 
Embed-3-2.pdfkp[k[odk[odk[d[ok[d[pkdkdkl
Embed-3-2.pdfkp[k[odk[odk[d[ok[d[pkdkdklEmbed-3-2.pdfkp[k[odk[odk[d[ok[d[pkdkdkl
Embed-3-2.pdfkp[k[odk[odk[d[ok[d[pkdkdkl
 
Embed-2-2.pdf[[app[r[prf[-rk;lme;[ed[prp[
Embed-2-2.pdf[[app[r[prf[-rk;lme;[ed[prp[Embed-2-2.pdf[[app[r[prf[-rk;lme;[ed[prp[
Embed-2-2.pdf[[app[r[prf[-rk;lme;[ed[prp[
 
REVIVING OUR STAR GOD IMAGES FROM MARRYING OUR 4 HOLY LAWS OF STAR GODS
REVIVING OUR STAR GOD IMAGES FROM MARRYING OUR 4 HOLY LAWS OF STAR GODSREVIVING OUR STAR GOD IMAGES FROM MARRYING OUR 4 HOLY LAWS OF STAR GODS
REVIVING OUR STAR GOD IMAGES FROM MARRYING OUR 4 HOLY LAWS OF STAR GODS
 
Dabholkar-matter-Judgement-1.pdfrefp;sdPp;
Dabholkar-matter-Judgement-1.pdfrefp;sdPp;Dabholkar-matter-Judgement-1.pdfrefp;sdPp;
Dabholkar-matter-Judgement-1.pdfrefp;sdPp;
 
Streamline Legal Operations: A Guide to Paralegal Services
Streamline Legal Operations: A Guide to Paralegal ServicesStreamline Legal Operations: A Guide to Paralegal Services
Streamline Legal Operations: A Guide to Paralegal Services
 
Trending Topics in ITC Litigation with Knobbe Martens
Trending Topics in ITC Litigation with Knobbe MartensTrending Topics in ITC Litigation with Knobbe Martens
Trending Topics in ITC Litigation with Knobbe Martens
 
dandan liu need to rot when she dies..pdf
dandan liu need to rot when she dies..pdfdandan liu need to rot when she dies..pdf
dandan liu need to rot when she dies..pdf
 
Justice Advocates Legal Defence Firm
Justice Advocates Legal Defence FirmJustice Advocates Legal Defence Firm
Justice Advocates Legal Defence Firm
 
Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2023 on Procedure for Appointment of Arbitr...
Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2023 on Procedure for Appointment of Arbitr...Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2023 on Procedure for Appointment of Arbitr...
Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2023 on Procedure for Appointment of Arbitr...
 
FAMILY LAW - Legacy Semester II .pptx
FAMILY    LAW - Legacy Semester II .pptxFAMILY    LAW - Legacy Semester II .pptx
FAMILY LAW - Legacy Semester II .pptx
 
Starbucks Corp. v. Sardarbuksh Coffee Co.
Starbucks Corp. v. Sardarbuksh Coffee Co.Starbucks Corp. v. Sardarbuksh Coffee Co.
Starbucks Corp. v. Sardarbuksh Coffee Co.
 
TTD - PPT on social stock exchange.pptx Presentation
TTD - PPT on social stock exchange.pptx PresentationTTD - PPT on social stock exchange.pptx Presentation
TTD - PPT on social stock exchange.pptx Presentation
 

5 common debt buyer lawsuit defenses

  • 1. 5 Common Debt Buyer Lawsuit Defenses In an earlier slide share presentation, I discussed Common Defenses to a Credit Card Lawsuit and focused on those cases filed by an original creditor. Here, we are dealing with 5 Common Debt Buyers Lawsuit Defenses such as those filed by Portfolio Recovery Associates, Midland Funding, Cavalry Portfolio Services or Cavalry SPV I, Unifund CCR, LVNV Funding and others. These are situations where the original credit card company sold the account to a 3rd party who moved forward with a lawsuit on the debt. Original Creditors Each of the defenses discussed in the original slide share also apply to debt buyers. The same consent orders entered by the original creditor are also relevant as to the balance owed when the account is sold. Additionally, the inconsistencies in the credit card statements and contract amendments can help dispute the alleged lawsuit. Counterclaims are discussed at greater length below because of the application of the FDCPA, but payment plans can still be an option, if necessary, in a debt buyer lawsuit. Standing Many answers to a lawsuit allege that the “Plaintiff lacks standing” as an affirmative defense, but what does that mean? At its most basic, the argument is that the debt buyer does not own the account or can’t prove that it owns the account. Often times, the only evidence that the debt buyer owns your account is a photocopied “Bill of Sale” or “Assignment” that does not reference your individual account in any manner. As an essential element of a collection lawsuit, the debt buyer needs to be able prove ownership of the debt. Admissibility of Evidence With the appropriate objection, it is difficult for debt buyers to admit the documentation obtained from the original creditor. A witness from the original creditor is rarely available to establish the authenticity and reliability of the credit card statements, if available at all. As the debt buyer’s witness likely does not have personal knowledge of the record keeping practices of the original creditor and considering the limitations in the transfer of the actual accounts, the Court can deny the admission of the documentation into evidence. Without the documentation in evidence, the debt buyer cannot prove its case. Conditions Precedent Another common affirmative defense in Florida is the “Failure to satisfy a condition precedent”. Florida law requires a debt buyer to provide notice that they purchased an account prior to filing a lawsuit. This is known as a condition precedent and must be established at trial if at issue. In pertinent part, Fla. Stat. § 559.715 states, “…the assignee must give the debtor written notice of such assignment as soon as practical after the assignment is made, but at least 30 days before any action to collect the debt.” Counterclaims The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) applies only to 3rd party debt collectors and covers many of the same debt collection violations as the FCCPA such as threats of violence, harassing collection calls, and other unfair collection actions. The FDCPA provides additional damages that can be used in addition to the FCCPA to offset the balance alleged in the debt buyer lawsuit or to recover damages. Conclusion Depending on the unique facts of each debt buyer lawsuit and your personal financial situation, there may be additional defenses available; however, this is a quick list of 5 Common Debt Buyer Lawsuit Defenses. In addition to each of the defenses in the original creditor lawsuit article, debt buyer lawsuit defenses include standing, limited admissibility of documents, conditions precedent, and additional damages under the FDCPA. If served or threatened with a credit card lawsuit by a debt buyer, please call Florida Credit Card Defense Lawyer Scott Florin at Florin Legal, P.A. at (813)449-4287 or request a free consultation.