SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  24
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Academic	
  Excellence	
   	
  
   Indicator	
  System 	
  
        2010-­‐11 	
  
Annual	
  Report	
  and	
  Public	
  Hearing	
  
           Georgetown	
  ISD    	
  
            February	
  16,	
  2012	
  
Academic	
  Excellence	
  Indicator	
  System	
  (AEIS)	
  
     Comprehensive	
  repor-ng	
  system	
  defined	
  by	
  statute	
  
     Published	
  annually	
  since	
  1990-­‐91	
  
     Gives	
  parents	
  and	
  community	
  a	
  snapshot	
  of	
  
           District/Campus	
  Performance	
  (Sec-on	
  I	
  of	
  AEIS	
  Report)	
  
           District/Campus	
  Profile	
  (Sec-on	
  II	
  of	
  AEIS	
  Report)	
  
     Contains	
  all	
  data	
  used	
  to	
  determine	
  District/Campus	
  
      accountability	
  ra-ngs	
  
     Uses	
  data	
  collected	
  through:	
  
           State	
  data	
  repor-ng	
  system	
  (PEIMS)	
  
           Student	
  assessment	
  system	
  
AEIS	
  Report	
  
  Cover	
  Page	
  
       District/Campus	
  2010-­‐11	
  
        Accountability	
  Ra-ng	
  
       District	
  PBM	
  Special	
  Educa-on	
  
        Monitoring	
  Results	
  Status	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  
        (if	
  applicable)	
  
       District/Campus	
  Gold	
  
        Performance	
  Acknowledgments	
  
AEIS	
  Report	
  
Overview	
  –	
  Three	
  SecLons	
  
   Sec-on	
  I:	
  	
  District/Campus	
  Performance	
  
       TAKS	
  Performance/Par-cipa-on	
  
           Disaggregated	
  by	
  grade	
  level	
  &	
  student	
  group	
  
       ARendance	
  &	
  Annual	
  Dropout	
  Rate	
  
       Comple-on	
  Rate	
  
       College	
  Readiness	
  Indicators	
  
           Advanced	
  Course/Dual	
  Enrollment	
  Comple-on,	
  RHSP	
  &	
  DAP	
  
            Graduates,	
  AP/IB	
  Results,	
  Texas	
  Success	
  Ini-a-ve	
  -­‐	
  Higher	
  
            Educa-on	
  Readiness	
  Component	
  (HERC),	
  SAT/ACT	
  Results,	
  
            College-­‐Ready	
  Graduates	
  (Class	
  of	
  2010)	
  
AEIS	
  Report	
  
Overview	
  –	
  Three	
  SecLons	
  
      Sec-on	
  II:	
  	
  District/Campus	
  Profile	
  
           Demographic	
  data	
  about	
  students	
  and	
  staff	
  
           Financial	
  informa-on	
  
           Program	
  informa-on	
  
      Sec-on	
  III:	
  	
  Bilingual	
  Educa-on	
  /	
  English	
  as	
  a	
  
       Second	
  Language	
  Report	
  
           TAKS	
  performance	
  data	
  for	
  current	
  year	
  Limited	
  
            English	
  Proficient	
  (LEP)	
  students	
  
AEIS:	
  2011	
  Accountability	
  Standards	
  
                                                                                                  	
  
                                                              Academically	
  
                                                               Acceptable           	
                     Recognized         	
                       Exemplary         	
  
                                                        Meets	
  each	
  standard:	
  
          TAKS	
  (2010-­‐11)	
  
                             	
  
                                                         	
  Reading/ELA……. 	
  70%	
             Meets	
  80%	
  standard	
  
(including	
  TAKS	
  (Acc),	
  TAKS-­‐M,	
  
                                                         	
  Wri-ng…………..          	
  70%	
        for	
  each	
  subject 	
  
&	
  TAKS-­‐Alt)	
  for	
  All	
  Students	
  &	
                                                                                              Meets	
  90%	
  standard	
  
each	
  student	
  group	
  (African	
                   	
  Social	
  Studies…… 	
  70%	
                    OR   	
  
                                                                                                                                                for	
  each	
  subject
                                                                                                                                                                     	
  
American,	
  Hispanic,	
  White,	
                       	
  Mathema-cs……. 	
  65%	
              Meets	
  75%	
  floor	
  and	
  
Economically	
  Disadv.)	
  mee-ng	
                     	
  Science…………..         	
  60%	
     Required	
  Improvement          	
  
minimum	
  size	
  requirements	
                       OR	
  Meets	
  Required	
  Imprv.	
  
  ELL	
  Progress	
  Indicator	
                                                                  60%	
  at	
  or	
  above	
  criteria	
     60%	
  at	
  or	
  above	
  criteria	
  
 (2010-­‐11)	
  TELPAS	
  or	
  TAKS     	
                             N/A	
                       OR	
  Meets	
  Required	
                  OR	
  Meets	
  Required	
  
   All	
  ELL	
  Students	
  ≥	
  30	
                                                                   Improvement           	
                   Improvement           	
  
Commended	
  Performance	
                                                                          Meets	
  15%	
  standard	
                 Meets	
  25%	
  standard	
  
(2010-­‐11)	
  (including	
  all	
  TAKS)	
                             N/A	
                       for	
  Reading/ELA	
  and	
                for	
  Reading/ELA	
  and	
  
if	
  meets	
  minimum	
  size	
  for	
  All	
  
Students	
  &	
  Econ.	
  Disadv.	
                                                                        Mathema-cs    	
                           Mathema-cs    	
  

                                                         Meets	
  75.0%	
  standard	
              Meets	
  85.0%	
  standard	
  
Comple@on	
  Rate	
  I*	
  
                                                          OR	
  Meets	
  Required	
                 OR	
  Meets	
  floor	
  of	
               Meets	
  95.0%	
  standard	
  
(Class	
  of	
  2010)	
  
                                                           Improvement	
  (RI)   	
                       75.0%	
  &	
  RI
                                                                                                                         	
  
Annual	
  Dropout	
  Rate*	
                              Meets	
  1.6%	
  standard	
               Meets	
  1.6%	
  standard	
                Meets	
  1.6%	
  standard	
  
(2009-­‐10)	
                                                OR	
  Meets	
  RI 	
                      OR	
  Meets	
  RI 	
                       OR	
  Meets	
  RI 	
  

  *	
  If	
  meets	
  minimum	
  size:	
  All	
  Students,	
  African	
  American,	
  
  	
  	
  	
  Hispanic,	
  White,	
  Economically	
  Disadvantaged	
  
2011	
  Accountability	
  Results	
  for	
  Georgetown	
  ISD	
  
  Exemplary:	
                                           Academically	
  Acceptable:	
  
      Ford	
  Elementary	
                                          Georgetown	
  High	
  School	
  
                                                                     Richarte	
  High	
  School	
  (AEA)*	
  
  Recognized	
  
        Georgetown	
  ISD	
                                         Benold	
  Middle	
  School	
  
        Georgetown	
  9th	
  Grade	
  (EVHS)	
                      Tippit	
  Middle	
  School	
  
        Cooper	
  Elementary	
                                      Forbes	
  Middle	
  School	
  
        McCoy	
  Elementary	
                                       PickeJ	
  Elementary	
  
        Frost	
  Elementary	
  
                                                                     Carver	
  Elementary	
  
        Village	
  Elementary	
  
        Williams	
  Elementary	
  
        Purl	
  Elementary	
                       *AEA	
  –	
  AlternaLve	
  EducaLon	
  Accountability	
  System	
  	
  	
  
                                                    (The	
  highest	
  raLng	
  allowed	
  is	
  Academically	
  Acceptable.)	
  
        Mitchell	
  Elementary	
  
Percent	
  Met	
  2011	
  TAKS	
  Performance	
  Standard	
  	
  
(Standard	
  Accountability	
  Indicator)	
  
New	
  Base	
  Indicators:	
  
     English	
  Language	
  Learners	
  Progress	
  Indicator:	
  
         81%	
  

     Commended	
  Performance:	
  
                                 Reading/ELA   Mathematics
               All Students         41%           40%
               Econ. Disadv.        27%           25%
CompleLon	
  Rate	
  I	
  

      Comple-on	
  Rate	
  I	
  (HS)	
  
             Grades	
  9-­‐12	
  
                                                                                    Dropped    Graduated
             4-­‐year	
  cohort	
  measure	
                                         Out
             Formula:	
  
                                                                                               Continued
                                                                                    Received
                                                 #	
   rdae +	
  o@ur
                                                 	
  	
  	
  	
  Gauts	
   Cn nes
                                                                      	
                         High
                                                                                      GED
                                                                                                School
#	
  Graduates	
  +	
  Con@nuers	
  +	
  GED	
  +	
  Dropouts
                                                            	
  
CompleLon	
  Rate	
  I	
  
Class	
  of	
  2010	
  (longitudinal	
  data)	
  
CompleLon	
  Rate	
  I	
  (Standard	
  Accountability	
  Indicator)	
  
Class	
  of	
  2010	
  (longitudinal	
  data)	
  
2011	
  Annual	
  Dropout	
  Rate	
  (Grades	
  7-­‐8,	
  2009-­‐10)	
  	
  
(Standard	
  Accountability	
  Indicator)	
  
AddiLonal	
  Indicators:	
  
College	
  Readiness	
  Indicators	
  
      Percent	
  of	
  high	
  school	
  students	
  comple-ng	
  an	
  
       Advanced	
  Course/Dual	
  Enrollment	
  in	
  2009-­‐10:	
  
          24.3	
  
      Percent	
  of	
  2010	
  graduates	
  comple-ng	
  the	
  
       Recommended	
  High	
  School	
  Program	
  or	
  Dis-nguished	
  
       Achievement	
  Program:	
  
          89.8	
  
      Advanced	
  Placement	
  (AP)	
  results	
  for	
  2009-­‐10:	
  
            %	
  Tested:	
  	
  18.3	
  
            %	
  Examinees	
  >=	
  Criterion*:	
  	
  75.2	
  
            %	
  Scores	
  >=	
  Criterion*:	
  	
  66.8	
  
                                                                   *3	
  on	
  AP	
  Exam	
  
Addi-onal	
  Indicators:	
  
SAT/ACT	
  Results	
  for	
  the	
  Class	
  of	
  2010	
  

         Percent Tested:                                        Average SAT Score:
                  All Students: 66.9                         GISD 1055 vs. 985 State Avg.
                  African Amer: 75.0
                  Hispanic: 50.3
                                                                 Average ACT Score:
                  White: 73.6
                                                              GISD 23.0 vs. 20.5 State Avg.
                  Eco. Disadv: N/A

         Percent At/Above Criterion*
                  All Students: 42.3
                  African Amer: 26.7
                  Hispanic: 25.0
                  White: 48.6
                  Eco. Disadv: N/A
                                                                *1110 on the SAT, or 24 on the ACT
AddiLonal	
  Indicators:	
  Texas	
  Success	
  IniLaLve	
  (TSI)	
  
Percent	
  of	
  11th	
  Graders	
  MeeLng	
  the	
  Higher	
  EducaLon	
  Readiness	
  Component	
  




   ELA: Scale Score ≥ 2200 & Score 3 or Higher on Essay             Math: Scale Score ≥ 2200
AddiLonal	
  Indicators:	
  2010	
  College-­‐Ready	
  Graduates	
  
AEIS	
  Report	
  
	
  SecLon	
  II	
  -­‐	
  Profile	
  
     Student	
  Informa-on	
                  Staff	
  Informa-on	
  
         Enrollment data by grade level           Type of staff
         Ethnic distribution                      Educational & experience level
         Other demographic statistics             Salary data
         Graduate information                     Turnover rate for teachers
         Retention rates
         Average class size information       Financial	
  Informa-on	
  
                                                   Tax information
                                                   Revenues
                                                   Expenditures

                                               Program	
  Informa-on	
  
                                                   Student enrollment
                                                   Teachers by program
SecLon	
  III:	
  Bilingual	
  EducaLon/English	
  as	
  a	
  Second	
  Language	
  Report	
  	
  
2010-­‐11	
  District	
  Performance	
  Report	
  for	
  Current	
  LEP	
  Students	
  
                         TAKS	
  Met	
  2011	
  Standard	
  (Sum	
  of	
  All	
  Grades	
  Tested)
                                                                                                 	
  
                         District	
  –	
  All	
                                                             LEP	
  –	
  No	
  
 Indicator:	
              Students       	
             Bilingual
                                                                 	
                     ESL
                                                                                          	
                 Services     	
  
 Reading/ELA	
                  93%	
                        79%	
                      64%	
                    87%	
  

 Mathema-cs	
                   90%	
                        82%	
                      66%	
                    88%	
  

 Wri-ng	
                       93%	
                        92%	
                      65%	
                    86%	
  

 Science	
                      87%	
                        71%	
                      38%	
                    33%	
  

 Social	
  Studies	
            97%	
                 No	
  Bilingual	
                 86%	
            Fewer	
  Than	
  5	
  
                                                    Students	
  Tested    	
                            Students	
  Tested      	
  
 All	
  Tests	
                 83%	
                        67%	
                      42%	
                    74%	
  
Campus	
  Performance	
  ObjecLves	
  
     Campus	
  Improvement	
  Plans	
  are	
  based	
  on	
  the	
  AEIS	
  data.	
  

     Performance	
  Objec-ves	
  are	
  approved	
  by	
  the	
  Board	
  of	
  
      Trustees.	
  

     Data	
  from	
  the	
  AEIS	
  gives	
  direc-on	
  for	
  the	
  development	
  of	
  
      performance	
  objec-ves	
  that	
  are	
  low	
  in	
  rela-on	
  to	
  the	
  
      accountability	
  standards.	
  
Violent	
  and	
  Criminal	
  Incidents	
  
   Texas	
  statute	
  (TEC	
  39.053)	
  requires	
  every	
  district	
  to	
  publish	
  an	
  annual	
  
    report	
  on	
  violent	
  and	
  criminal	
  incidents	
  at	
  campuses	
  in	
  the	
  district	
  

   The	
  report	
  must	
  include:	
  
         Number, rate, and type of incidents
         Information concerning school violence prevention and intervention
          policies and procedures used by the district
         Findings that result from evaluations conducted under the Safe and
          Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act
Violent	
  and	
  Criminal	
  Incidents	
  for	
  2010-­‐11	
  
             Type                 #     Rate                     Type                    #    Rate
  Controlled Substances           8    0.08%       Alcohol Offenses                      4    0.04%
  (including felony violations)

  Criminal Mischief               1    0.01%       Weapons Violation                     11   0.11%
  Arson                           0      0%        Assault (on employee/volunteer)       5    0.05%
  Retaliation                     1    0.01%       Assault (not on employee/volunteer)   7    0.07%
  Cigarette/Tobacco               6    0.06%       Fighting/Mutual Combat                4    0.04%
  Terroristic Threat &            1    0.01%       Public Lewdness & Indecent            4    0.04%
  False Report                                     Exposure
  Conduct Punishable as           1    0.01%       Other*                                0      0%
  a Felony
 *Other: Other felonies (e.g., felony theft), school-related gang violence, gang-related activity, indecency
 with a child, aggravated kidnapping, aggravated robbery, aggravated assault, sexual assault,
 manslaughter, negligent homicide, deadly conduct, and murder

 Sources: PEIMS Edit+ Student Disciplinary Action Summary, 2010-11 Summer;
 GISD Total Enrollment as of Fall 2010-11 PEIMS Resubmission
Student	
  Enrollment	
  and	
  Academic	
  Performance	
  	
  
     (Texas	
  Higher	
  EducaLon	
  CoordinaLng	
  Board	
  –	
  Required	
  Report)
                                                                                    	
  
      Data	
  collected	
  and	
  reported	
  by	
  the	
  THECB	
  in	
  an	
  annual	
  report:	
  	
  
  	
  Report	
  of	
  2008-­‐2009	
  High	
  School	
  Graduates’	
  Enrollment	
  and	
  Academic	
  Performance	
  in	
  Texas	
  
                                            Public	
  Higher	
  EducaLon	
  in	
  Fiscal	
  Year	
  2010   	
  
  Reports	
  on	
  student	
  performance	
  in	
  postsecondary	
  ins-tu-ons	
  during	
  the	
  first	
  year	
  enrolled	
  
       aner	
  gradua-on	
  from	
  high	
  school	
  

                                                                    GPA for 1st Year in Public Higher Education in Texas
                                                    Total
       District: Georgetown ISD                   Graduates   < 2.0        2.0 – 2.49      2.5 – 2.99      3.0 – 3.49        > 3.5        Unknown

       Four-Year Public University: GHS             166        26              28             35              49              28              0
       Four-Year Public University: RHS              3          *               *              *               *               *              *
       Two-Year Public Colleges: GHS & RHS          145        29              30             22              24              29             11
       Independent Colleges & Universities: GHS      39
       Not Trackable: GHS                            12
       Not Found: GHS & RHS                         240
       Total High School Graduates in GISD          605

      GHS:	
  Georgetown	
  High	
  School	
                        *If	
  enrollment	
  in	
  public	
  higher	
  educaLon	
  is	
  less	
  than	
  25,	
  
      RHS:	
  Richarte	
  High	
  School	
                          the	
  GPA	
  data	
  is	
  omifed.	
  
Accessing	
  the	
  AEIS	
  Report	
  
  Where	
  the	
  report	
  is	
  available:	
  
       TEA: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/aeis/2011/index.html

       GISD website: http://www.georgetownisd.org/Domain/146

       Campus libraries or offices (available within 2 weeks of public hearing)

       Central administration building (available within 2 weeks of public
        hearing)

      Contact	
  InformaLon	
  
     Becky	
  McCoy,	
  GISD	
  
     Assessment	
  Director    	
  
  (512)	
  943-­‐5000,	
  ext.	
  6034	
  
mccoyr@georgetownisd.org	
                   • 	
  AEIS	
  Reports	
  
                                             (coming	
  soon)    	
  

Contenu connexe

Similaire à AEIS Report Presentation

State accountability system 2015
State accountability system 2015State accountability system 2015
State accountability system 2015txprincipalorg
 
Vertical Scale Scores
Vertical Scale ScoresVertical Scale Scores
Vertical Scale Scoresguest3921f8
 
Sample data presentation
Sample data presentationSample data presentation
Sample data presentationmarlaphillips3
 
Ed6157 sp11leadershiptechresearcha cumspton
Ed6157 sp11leadershiptechresearcha cumsptonEd6157 sp11leadershiptechresearcha cumspton
Ed6157 sp11leadershiptechresearcha cumsptonAlana Cumpston
 
Havelock snapshot
Havelock snapshotHavelock snapshot
Havelock snapshotsmithlori24
 
Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...
Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...
Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...National Partnership for Educational Access
 
SB 71 - Results Based Financing for Early Childhood Education
SB 71 - Results Based Financing for Early Childhood EducationSB 71 - Results Based Financing for Early Childhood Education
SB 71 - Results Based Financing for Early Childhood Educationemilynicoline
 
key performance index key performance in
key performance index key performance inkey performance index key performance in
key performance index key performance inBeccaLeizylle
 
Carlsbad Unified Annual Rept 2009
Carlsbad Unified Annual Rept 2009Carlsbad Unified Annual Rept 2009
Carlsbad Unified Annual Rept 2009dvodicka
 
002709_2009-2010_BUILD
002709_2009-2010_BUILD002709_2009-2010_BUILD
002709_2009-2010_BUILDStephen Fujii
 
DE-MYSTIFYING THE U.S. NEWS RANKINGS
DE-MYSTIFYING THE U.S. NEWS RANKINGSDE-MYSTIFYING THE U.S. NEWS RANKINGS
DE-MYSTIFYING THE U.S. NEWS RANKINGSJoe Brennan, Ph.D.
 
ACT EPC Keynote - Enrollment Management Trends Report
ACT EPC Keynote - Enrollment Management Trends ReportACT EPC Keynote - Enrollment Management Trends Report
ACT EPC Keynote - Enrollment Management Trends ReportStamats_ACT
 
MURSD 2012 MCAS Results & Accountability Status
MURSD 2012 MCAS Results & Accountability StatusMURSD 2012 MCAS Results & Accountability Status
MURSD 2012 MCAS Results & Accountability Statusjpm66
 

Similaire à AEIS Report Presentation (20)

NCCE Bylsma
NCCE BylsmaNCCE Bylsma
NCCE Bylsma
 
8.15 principal seminar final
8.15 principal seminar final8.15 principal seminar final
8.15 principal seminar final
 
REIL School Growth Measures and the Calculation of the REIL Score
REIL School Growth Measures and the Calculation of the REIL ScoreREIL School Growth Measures and the Calculation of the REIL Score
REIL School Growth Measures and the Calculation of the REIL Score
 
State accountability system 2015
State accountability system 2015State accountability system 2015
State accountability system 2015
 
Vertical Scale Scores
Vertical Scale ScoresVertical Scale Scores
Vertical Scale Scores
 
AYP 2010-2011 Presentation
AYP 2010-2011 PresentationAYP 2010-2011 Presentation
AYP 2010-2011 Presentation
 
Sample data presentation
Sample data presentationSample data presentation
Sample data presentation
 
Ed6157 sp11leadershiptechresearcha cumspton
Ed6157 sp11leadershiptechresearcha cumsptonEd6157 sp11leadershiptechresearcha cumspton
Ed6157 sp11leadershiptechresearcha cumspton
 
AEIS 2012 Georgetown ISD Presentation
AEIS 2012 Georgetown ISD PresentationAEIS 2012 Georgetown ISD Presentation
AEIS 2012 Georgetown ISD Presentation
 
Havelock snapshot
Havelock snapshotHavelock snapshot
Havelock snapshot
 
DCLT Forum September 2012: The American Classroom by. Rocco Tomazic
DCLT Forum September 2012: The American Classroom by. Rocco TomazicDCLT Forum September 2012: The American Classroom by. Rocco Tomazic
DCLT Forum September 2012: The American Classroom by. Rocco Tomazic
 
Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...
Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...
Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...
 
SB 71 - Results Based Financing for Early Childhood Education
SB 71 - Results Based Financing for Early Childhood EducationSB 71 - Results Based Financing for Early Childhood Education
SB 71 - Results Based Financing for Early Childhood Education
 
key performance index key performance in
key performance index key performance inkey performance index key performance in
key performance index key performance in
 
Carlsbad Unified Annual Rept 2009
Carlsbad Unified Annual Rept 2009Carlsbad Unified Annual Rept 2009
Carlsbad Unified Annual Rept 2009
 
002709_2009-2010_BUILD
002709_2009-2010_BUILD002709_2009-2010_BUILD
002709_2009-2010_BUILD
 
DE-MYSTIFYING THE U.S. NEWS RANKINGS
DE-MYSTIFYING THE U.S. NEWS RANKINGSDE-MYSTIFYING THE U.S. NEWS RANKINGS
DE-MYSTIFYING THE U.S. NEWS RANKINGS
 
A f detailed power point for s-boe 11.7.11
A f detailed power point  for s-boe 11.7.11A f detailed power point  for s-boe 11.7.11
A f detailed power point for s-boe 11.7.11
 
ACT EPC Keynote - Enrollment Management Trends Report
ACT EPC Keynote - Enrollment Management Trends ReportACT EPC Keynote - Enrollment Management Trends Report
ACT EPC Keynote - Enrollment Management Trends Report
 
MURSD 2012 MCAS Results & Accountability Status
MURSD 2012 MCAS Results & Accountability StatusMURSD 2012 MCAS Results & Accountability Status
MURSD 2012 MCAS Results & Accountability Status
 

Plus de Georgetown Independent School District

Plus de Georgetown Independent School District (20)

Financial Presentation July 2014
Financial Presentation July 2014Financial Presentation July 2014
Financial Presentation July 2014
 
Georgetown ISD Financial Presentation June 2014
Georgetown ISD Financial Presentation June 2014Georgetown ISD Financial Presentation June 2014
Georgetown ISD Financial Presentation June 2014
 
Georgetown ISD Elementary School #11
Georgetown ISD Elementary School #11Georgetown ISD Elementary School #11
Georgetown ISD Elementary School #11
 
2013-2014 Budget Update Presentation
2013-2014 Budget Update Presentation2013-2014 Budget Update Presentation
2013-2014 Budget Update Presentation
 
Huckabee Presentat
Huckabee PresentatHuckabee Presentat
Huckabee Presentat
 
Schools First Financial Reports
Schools First Financial ReportsSchools First Financial Reports
Schools First Financial Reports
 
Tax Ratification Election Presentation
Tax Ratification Election PresentationTax Ratification Election Presentation
Tax Ratification Election Presentation
 
GISD Budget and Finance Overview 2012
GISD Budget and Finance Overview 2012GISD Budget and Finance Overview 2012
GISD Budget and Finance Overview 2012
 
2012-2013 Elementary Scheduling
2012-2013 Elementary Scheduling2012-2013 Elementary Scheduling
2012-2013 Elementary Scheduling
 
SHW Construction Update - April 2012
SHW Construction Update - April 2012SHW Construction Update - April 2012
SHW Construction Update - April 2012
 
Huckabee Construction Update April 2012
Huckabee Construction Update April 2012Huckabee Construction Update April 2012
Huckabee Construction Update April 2012
 
03-26-12 McCoy Project Update
03-26-12 McCoy Project Update03-26-12 McCoy Project Update
03-26-12 McCoy Project Update
 
03-26-12 Huckabee Project Update
03-26-12 Huckabee Project Update03-26-12 Huckabee Project Update
03-26-12 Huckabee Project Update
 
STAAR High School Presentation
STAAR High School PresentationSTAAR High School Presentation
STAAR High School Presentation
 
STAAR Grade 3-8 Presentation
STAAR Grade 3-8 PresentationSTAAR Grade 3-8 Presentation
STAAR Grade 3-8 Presentation
 
SHW Update 02-06-2012
SHW Update 02-06-2012SHW Update 02-06-2012
SHW Update 02-06-2012
 
Huckabee Update 02-06-2012
Huckabee Update 02-06-2012Huckabee Update 02-06-2012
Huckabee Update 02-06-2012
 
SHW Update 01-10-2012
SHW Update 01-10-2012SHW Update 01-10-2012
SHW Update 01-10-2012
 
Huckabee Update 01-10-2012
Huckabee Update 01-10-2012Huckabee Update 01-10-2012
Huckabee Update 01-10-2012
 
A Report to Citizens
A Report to CitizensA Report to Citizens
A Report to Citizens
 

Dernier

Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactPECB
 
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfJayanti Pande
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationnomboosow
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxheathfieldcps1
 
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfArihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfchloefrazer622
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactdawncurless
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfsanyamsingh5019
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionMaksud Ahmed
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingTechSoup
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxVishalSingh1417
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfciinovamais
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeThiyagu K
 
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)eniolaolutunde
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...christianmathematics
 
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajansocial pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajanpragatimahajan3
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsTechSoup
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityGeoBlogs
 

Dernier (20)

Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
 
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
 
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfArihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajansocial pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 

AEIS Report Presentation

  • 1. Academic  Excellence     Indicator  System   2010-­‐11   Annual  Report  and  Public  Hearing   Georgetown  ISD   February  16,  2012  
  • 2. Academic  Excellence  Indicator  System  (AEIS)     Comprehensive  repor-ng  system  defined  by  statute     Published  annually  since  1990-­‐91     Gives  parents  and  community  a  snapshot  of     District/Campus  Performance  (Sec-on  I  of  AEIS  Report)     District/Campus  Profile  (Sec-on  II  of  AEIS  Report)     Contains  all  data  used  to  determine  District/Campus   accountability  ra-ngs     Uses  data  collected  through:     State  data  repor-ng  system  (PEIMS)     Student  assessment  system  
  • 3. AEIS  Report     Cover  Page     District/Campus  2010-­‐11   Accountability  Ra-ng     District  PBM  Special  Educa-on   Monitoring  Results  Status                   (if  applicable)     District/Campus  Gold   Performance  Acknowledgments  
  • 4. AEIS  Report   Overview  –  Three  SecLons     Sec-on  I:    District/Campus  Performance     TAKS  Performance/Par-cipa-on     Disaggregated  by  grade  level  &  student  group     ARendance  &  Annual  Dropout  Rate     Comple-on  Rate     College  Readiness  Indicators     Advanced  Course/Dual  Enrollment  Comple-on,  RHSP  &  DAP   Graduates,  AP/IB  Results,  Texas  Success  Ini-a-ve  -­‐  Higher   Educa-on  Readiness  Component  (HERC),  SAT/ACT  Results,   College-­‐Ready  Graduates  (Class  of  2010)  
  • 5. AEIS  Report   Overview  –  Three  SecLons     Sec-on  II:    District/Campus  Profile     Demographic  data  about  students  and  staff     Financial  informa-on     Program  informa-on     Sec-on  III:    Bilingual  Educa-on  /  English  as  a   Second  Language  Report     TAKS  performance  data  for  current  year  Limited   English  Proficient  (LEP)  students  
  • 6. AEIS:  2011  Accountability  Standards     Academically   Acceptable   Recognized   Exemplary   Meets  each  standard:   TAKS  (2010-­‐11)        Reading/ELA…….  70%   Meets  80%  standard   (including  TAKS  (Acc),  TAKS-­‐M,      Wri-ng…………..  70%   for  each  subject   &  TAKS-­‐Alt)  for  All  Students  &   Meets  90%  standard   each  student  group  (African      Social  Studies……  70%   OR   for  each  subject   American,  Hispanic,  White,      Mathema-cs…….  65%   Meets  75%  floor  and   Economically  Disadv.)  mee-ng      Science…………..  60%   Required  Improvement   minimum  size  requirements   OR  Meets  Required  Imprv.   ELL  Progress  Indicator   60%  at  or  above  criteria   60%  at  or  above  criteria   (2010-­‐11)  TELPAS  or  TAKS   N/A   OR  Meets  Required   OR  Meets  Required   All  ELL  Students  ≥  30   Improvement   Improvement   Commended  Performance   Meets  15%  standard   Meets  25%  standard   (2010-­‐11)  (including  all  TAKS)   N/A   for  Reading/ELA  and   for  Reading/ELA  and   if  meets  minimum  size  for  All   Students  &  Econ.  Disadv.   Mathema-cs   Mathema-cs   Meets  75.0%  standard   Meets  85.0%  standard   Comple@on  Rate  I*   OR  Meets  Required   OR  Meets  floor  of   Meets  95.0%  standard   (Class  of  2010)   Improvement  (RI)   75.0%  &  RI   Annual  Dropout  Rate*   Meets  1.6%  standard   Meets  1.6%  standard   Meets  1.6%  standard   (2009-­‐10)   OR  Meets  RI   OR  Meets  RI   OR  Meets  RI   *  If  meets  minimum  size:  All  Students,  African  American,        Hispanic,  White,  Economically  Disadvantaged  
  • 7. 2011  Accountability  Results  for  Georgetown  ISD     Exemplary:     Academically  Acceptable:     Ford  Elementary     Georgetown  High  School     Richarte  High  School  (AEA)*     Recognized     Georgetown  ISD     Benold  Middle  School     Georgetown  9th  Grade  (EVHS)     Tippit  Middle  School     Cooper  Elementary     Forbes  Middle  School     McCoy  Elementary     PickeJ  Elementary     Frost  Elementary     Carver  Elementary     Village  Elementary     Williams  Elementary     Purl  Elementary   *AEA  –  AlternaLve  EducaLon  Accountability  System       (The  highest  raLng  allowed  is  Academically  Acceptable.)     Mitchell  Elementary  
  • 8. Percent  Met  2011  TAKS  Performance  Standard     (Standard  Accountability  Indicator)  
  • 9. New  Base  Indicators:     English  Language  Learners  Progress  Indicator:     81%     Commended  Performance:   Reading/ELA Mathematics All Students 41% 40% Econ. Disadv. 27% 25%
  • 10. CompleLon  Rate  I   Comple-on  Rate  I  (HS)     Grades  9-­‐12   Dropped Graduated   4-­‐year  cohort  measure   Out   Formula:   Continued Received #   rdae +  o@ur        Gauts   Cn nes   High GED School #  Graduates  +  Con@nuers  +  GED  +  Dropouts  
  • 11. CompleLon  Rate  I   Class  of  2010  (longitudinal  data)  
  • 12. CompleLon  Rate  I  (Standard  Accountability  Indicator)   Class  of  2010  (longitudinal  data)  
  • 13. 2011  Annual  Dropout  Rate  (Grades  7-­‐8,  2009-­‐10)     (Standard  Accountability  Indicator)  
  • 14. AddiLonal  Indicators:   College  Readiness  Indicators     Percent  of  high  school  students  comple-ng  an   Advanced  Course/Dual  Enrollment  in  2009-­‐10:     24.3     Percent  of  2010  graduates  comple-ng  the   Recommended  High  School  Program  or  Dis-nguished   Achievement  Program:     89.8     Advanced  Placement  (AP)  results  for  2009-­‐10:     %  Tested:    18.3     %  Examinees  >=  Criterion*:    75.2     %  Scores  >=  Criterion*:    66.8   *3  on  AP  Exam  
  • 15. Addi-onal  Indicators:   SAT/ACT  Results  for  the  Class  of  2010     Percent Tested:   Average SAT Score:   All Students: 66.9 GISD 1055 vs. 985 State Avg.   African Amer: 75.0   Hispanic: 50.3   Average ACT Score:   White: 73.6 GISD 23.0 vs. 20.5 State Avg.   Eco. Disadv: N/A   Percent At/Above Criterion*   All Students: 42.3   African Amer: 26.7   Hispanic: 25.0   White: 48.6   Eco. Disadv: N/A *1110 on the SAT, or 24 on the ACT
  • 16. AddiLonal  Indicators:  Texas  Success  IniLaLve  (TSI)   Percent  of  11th  Graders  MeeLng  the  Higher  EducaLon  Readiness  Component   ELA: Scale Score ≥ 2200 & Score 3 or Higher on Essay Math: Scale Score ≥ 2200
  • 17. AddiLonal  Indicators:  2010  College-­‐Ready  Graduates  
  • 18. AEIS  Report    SecLon  II  -­‐  Profile     Student  Informa-on     Staff  Informa-on     Enrollment data by grade level   Type of staff   Ethnic distribution   Educational & experience level   Other demographic statistics   Salary data   Graduate information   Turnover rate for teachers   Retention rates   Average class size information   Financial  Informa-on     Tax information   Revenues   Expenditures   Program  Informa-on     Student enrollment   Teachers by program
  • 19. SecLon  III:  Bilingual  EducaLon/English  as  a  Second  Language  Report     2010-­‐11  District  Performance  Report  for  Current  LEP  Students   TAKS  Met  2011  Standard  (Sum  of  All  Grades  Tested)   District  –  All   LEP  –  No   Indicator:   Students   Bilingual   ESL   Services   Reading/ELA   93%   79%   64%   87%   Mathema-cs   90%   82%   66%   88%   Wri-ng   93%   92%   65%   86%   Science   87%   71%   38%   33%   Social  Studies   97%   No  Bilingual   86%   Fewer  Than  5   Students  Tested   Students  Tested   All  Tests   83%   67%   42%   74%  
  • 20. Campus  Performance  ObjecLves     Campus  Improvement  Plans  are  based  on  the  AEIS  data.     Performance  Objec-ves  are  approved  by  the  Board  of   Trustees.     Data  from  the  AEIS  gives  direc-on  for  the  development  of   performance  objec-ves  that  are  low  in  rela-on  to  the   accountability  standards.  
  • 21. Violent  and  Criminal  Incidents     Texas  statute  (TEC  39.053)  requires  every  district  to  publish  an  annual   report  on  violent  and  criminal  incidents  at  campuses  in  the  district     The  report  must  include:     Number, rate, and type of incidents   Information concerning school violence prevention and intervention policies and procedures used by the district   Findings that result from evaluations conducted under the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act
  • 22. Violent  and  Criminal  Incidents  for  2010-­‐11   Type # Rate Type # Rate Controlled Substances 8 0.08% Alcohol Offenses 4 0.04% (including felony violations) Criminal Mischief 1 0.01% Weapons Violation 11 0.11% Arson 0 0% Assault (on employee/volunteer) 5 0.05% Retaliation 1 0.01% Assault (not on employee/volunteer) 7 0.07% Cigarette/Tobacco 6 0.06% Fighting/Mutual Combat 4 0.04% Terroristic Threat & 1 0.01% Public Lewdness & Indecent 4 0.04% False Report Exposure Conduct Punishable as 1 0.01% Other* 0 0% a Felony *Other: Other felonies (e.g., felony theft), school-related gang violence, gang-related activity, indecency with a child, aggravated kidnapping, aggravated robbery, aggravated assault, sexual assault, manslaughter, negligent homicide, deadly conduct, and murder Sources: PEIMS Edit+ Student Disciplinary Action Summary, 2010-11 Summer; GISD Total Enrollment as of Fall 2010-11 PEIMS Resubmission
  • 23. Student  Enrollment  and  Academic  Performance     (Texas  Higher  EducaLon  CoordinaLng  Board  –  Required  Report)     Data  collected  and  reported  by  the  THECB  in  an  annual  report:      Report  of  2008-­‐2009  High  School  Graduates’  Enrollment  and  Academic  Performance  in  Texas   Public  Higher  EducaLon  in  Fiscal  Year  2010     Reports  on  student  performance  in  postsecondary  ins-tu-ons  during  the  first  year  enrolled   aner  gradua-on  from  high  school   GPA for 1st Year in Public Higher Education in Texas Total District: Georgetown ISD Graduates < 2.0 2.0 – 2.49 2.5 – 2.99 3.0 – 3.49 > 3.5 Unknown Four-Year Public University: GHS 166 26 28 35 49 28 0 Four-Year Public University: RHS 3 * * * * * * Two-Year Public Colleges: GHS & RHS 145 29 30 22 24 29 11 Independent Colleges & Universities: GHS 39 Not Trackable: GHS 12 Not Found: GHS & RHS 240 Total High School Graduates in GISD 605 GHS:  Georgetown  High  School   *If  enrollment  in  public  higher  educaLon  is  less  than  25,   RHS:  Richarte  High  School   the  GPA  data  is  omifed.  
  • 24. Accessing  the  AEIS  Report     Where  the  report  is  available:     TEA: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/aeis/2011/index.html   GISD website: http://www.georgetownisd.org/Domain/146   Campus libraries or offices (available within 2 weeks of public hearing)   Central administration building (available within 2 weeks of public hearing) Contact  InformaLon   Becky  McCoy,  GISD   Assessment  Director   (512)  943-­‐5000,  ext.  6034   mccoyr@georgetownisd.org   •   AEIS  Reports   (coming  soon)