1. Community Engagement and Authentic Modeling: A Social Cognitive Theory of Change 1
Community Engagement and Authentic Modeling: A Social Cognitive Theory of Change
By Greg Munno / gjmunno@syr.edu
For Professor Makana Chock
S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communication, Syracuse University
December 15, 2011
2. Community Engagement and Authentic Modeling: A Social Cognitive Theory of Change 2
Abstract
Early childhood experiences effect people their whole lives. Exposure to substance
abusers, malnutrition, stress, and other negative experiences early in life have been shown to
have a lasting impact, leading to lower levels of educational attainment, higher rates of
incarceration, and elevated risk of chronic disease.
Meanwhile, evidence shows that intervention programs that target parents of young
children have been effective in avoiding some detrimental outcomes. It has also been shown
that theory-based interventions, particularly those that utilize social cognitive theory, have had
a greater impact than interventions that lack a theoretical framework.
This paper reviews the literature on social cognitive theory, with a focus on its potential
application to early childhood education and development programs.
The review leads to hypotheses that predict social cognitive approaches can be
enhanced when executed within acommunity engagement framework.
By involving the community in message creation, I predict that a program can increase
attention to its messages, increase identification with its messages, and, ultimately, can have a
greater effect on parental self-efficacy.
3. Community Engagement and Authentic Modeling: A Social Cognitive Theory of Change 3
Community Engagement and Authentic Modeling: A Social Cognitive Theory of Change
For Albert Bandura, the human ability to learn is both the cause, and potential cure, of
our individual and collective shortcomings. “Infants,” Bandura writes, “exhibit sensitivity to
causal relations between environmental events even in the first months of life” (2006, p. 169).
In other words, our environment starts to shape us immediately.
Yet humans also shape their environment and each other. We are capable of learning
far more than we experience directly. We can deduce from one experience what similar action
in a different context might bear. We can learn from watching other people, the process of
social learning. For Bandura, both deduction and social learning are made possible by the
uniquely human trait of symbolic modeling. “It is with symbols that people process and
transform transient experiences into cognitive models that serve as guides for judgment and
action,” he writes (2001, p. 267).
People, then, are “self-organizing, proactive, self-reflecting, and self-regulating,” but are
nonetheless subject to both biological and social-structural forces (Bandura, 2001, p. 266). We
are both products and producers of our physical and social realities.
Parents and community provide the raw materialsyoung humans use to create the
symbolic models on which they base their beliefs and future actions. For this reason, applying
social cognitive theory to issues of early childhood development is particularly intriguing. Social
cognitive theory-based approaches may provide the basis for a “two-for-one” intervention,
increasing the efficacy of two generations at once. If an intervention that models better
parenting leads to better parenting, then the power of the model is exponentially increased.
This paper, then, seeks to:
4. Community Engagement and Authentic Modeling: A Social Cognitive Theory of Change 4
1. Further examine social cognitive theory for the purposes of understanding how it
might apply to efforts to improve parenting and childhood development;
2. Review relevant studies that test programs based on social cognitive theory;
3. Link social cognitive theory to the literature on community engagement, and to
argue that such engagements could potential lead to more effective SCT-based
interventions;
4. Build hypotheses,
5. Discuss a project the author is involved in that might provide the basis for testing
those hypotheses.
A Case for Action
Early Childhood Development
Bandura’s notion of human agency provides for the possibility that people can
overcome difficult upbringings. People, he writes, “intentionally influence (their) functioning
and life circumstances” (Bandura, 2006, p. 164). However, that doesn’t mean that experiences
can’t irreparably harm us, or that early experiences do not impact our abilities to act effectively
later in life.
Stress, poor nutrition, and neglect can have a lasting impact(Grason, et al, 2004, p. 3;
Middlebrooks & Audage, 2008, p. 8).Middlebrooks and Audage, writing for the Centers for
Disease Control, found that abused children grow up to experience higher instances of teen
pregnancy, more involvement with domestic violence, and higher suicide rates (p. 8). Grason
and her colleagues at Johns Hopkinsfound that children who start school behind their cohort
rarely catch up. And yet, they also concluded that interventions promoting positive behavior
5. Community Engagement and Authentic Modeling: A Social Cognitive Theory of Change 5
avoided more costly interventions later (p. 3). The value of such efforts, they added, has been
recognized, as evidenced by several large initiatives underway, including the federal Healthy
Steps granting program (Grason, et al, p. 4; http://www.healthysteps.org/).
Effect of Theory-based Intervention
Public health programs are not created equal. Glanz and Bishop (2010) explicitly
compared the effectiveness of programs that were based on theory and those that were not.
They found that “public health and health-promotion interventions that are based on social and
behavioral science theories are more effective than those lacking a theoretical base” (Glanz &
Bishop, 2010, p. 399). The mechanism by which theory can aid the development and
implementation of a public health program is not well understood (p. 404). But Glanz and
Bishop speculate that the application of theory can help suggest innovative interventions.
Another possibility is that theory-based strategies signal the presence of the rigor required for
the effective planning, implementation, and measurement of effective public health programs
(p. 404).
The authors identified four theories that have been used most often and most
effectively in developing public health programs (Glanz & Bishop, 2010, pp. 402-404):
1. The Health Belief Model, which postulates that people’s perceptions of the risk
and rewardsof action influence whether they actually act;
2. The Trans-theoretical and Stages of Change models, which provide a heuristic
for moving people through the various stages that lead to real change;
3. Social Cognitive Theory itself; and,
4. The Social Ecological Model, which the authors see as consistent with Social
6. Community Engagement and Authentic Modeling: A Social Cognitive Theory of Change 6
Cognitive Theory, but with an application focused on system-level factors that
affect behaviors within a population as opposed to individuals.
From Message to Adjustment
Glanz and Bishop identify several components of Social Cognitive Theory as key to public
health interventions, includingobservational learning, reinforcement, and self-efficacy.
Attention, Identification & Reinforcement
In a public health campaign, the delivery mechanism for modeled behavior is often a
media message. For it to have any impact, the audience must first pay some attention to it
(Pajares, Prestin, Chen & Nabi, 2009, p. 287). The first part of the attention equation is simply
one of availability. We might ask: Are the message and its target audience located in the same
place within space and time, thus giving the audience an opportunity to see it? Did the target
audience actually see it? Did the audience have the ability to make any sense of the message,
or was it, perhaps, in a language they don’t even understand?
The next salient quality of attention is identification. As Pajares and his colleagues write:
“For mediated content to positively affect audience members’ behaviors, audience members
must pay attention to attractive or similar models realistically performing relevant behaviors”
(p. 287). Such positive modeling by a model the receiver can identify with is the basis for
observational learning.
Brown and Basil’s 1995 study of Ervin “Magic” Johnson’s announcement that he was HIV
positive offers a great example. Immediately after Johnson’s announcement, calls to the
National AIDS Hotline jumped by a factor of 10 to more than 40,000 in just one day (Brown &
Basil, p. 346). Testing sights were similarly overrun.
7. Community Engagement and Authentic Modeling: A Social Cognitive Theory of Change 7
But the effect of the announcement, along with Johnson’s message that, (1) anyone can
get AIDS and (2) everyone should get tested, was not universal. Rather, those who had some
knowledge of Magic Johnson were more likely to seek testing after the announcement than
those who did not know of the celebrity sports figure (Brown & Basil, p. 361). This increase,
however, was small. More significantly, those who felt “involved” with Johnson -- peoplewho
felt an emotional, parasocial attachment to him -- were far more likely to take his message to
heart (p. 364). They identified with Johnson.
Since many people had an attachment to Johnson -- and, crucially, since that
attachment was positive -- it had a large effect (Brown & Basil, p. 360-361). It was positively
reinforced. If Johnson was despised, people would have dismissed his revelation that
heterosexual men were at risk of contracting HIV. Likewise, if Johnson had been harshly
reprimanded for his revelation -- let’s imagine that other NBA stars ostracized him -- then his
announcement may have had the opposite effect, discouraging people from getting tested.
So Johnson had all the attributes of a successful positive social model. He was well
known, closely followed, and had the power to grab headlines (attention). By being forthright
and urging testing, he was modeling socially beneficial behavior. Since he was well liked, well
spoken, and open, people identified with him, giving that message salience. The media, his
teammates, and others then praised him for his candor and his actions, positively reinforcing
the behavior.
Self-Efficacy
For Bandura and other social cognitive theorists, belief precedes actions. “Unless people
believe that they can produce a desired effect and forestall undesired ones by their actions,
8. Community Engagement and Authentic Modeling: A Social Cognitive Theory of Change 8
they have little incentive to act,” Bandura writes (2001, p. 270). Efficacy beliefs, then, are
beliefs that cause people to think optimistically or pessimistically that a change in behavior will
increase their well-being. Pajares and his colleagues go further, saying “self-efficacy beliefs are
better predictors of people’s accomplishments than their previous accomplishments,
knowledge, or skills” (p. 286).
Have never used an iPhone before but believe you will master the technology easily? By
this theory, you have a good chance of success. This is not, however, some sort of magic -- will
it and it will be!
Rather, through your efficacy, you have set a goal and believe you can reach it. That
bodes well for persisting when you encounter obstacles, which is also known as
resiliency(Pajares, Prestin, Chen & Nabi, 2009, p. 286). Meanwhile, high self-efficacy “will not
influence behavior when people lack the resources to undertake an activity … or do not value
the expected outcome” (Pajares, Prestin, Chen & Nabi, 2009, p. 286). Again, it’s not magic.
But if you can show people that certain actions will have a positive effect, and that they
do, in fact, have the resources needed to take those actions, you have a chance at increasing
their self-efficacy and generating the desired behavior.
Evidence of an Effect
Parenting Self-Efficacy
A team of scholars from Arizona State University designed an ambitious study to test
social cognitive theory among Mexican American families living in the Southwest (Dumka,
Gonzales, Wheeler & Millsap, 2010, p. 522). Using a longitudinal design, they looked at:
1. Whether the parents of teens thought they were good parents who exerted “positive
9. Community Engagement and Authentic Modeling: A Social Cognitive Theory of Change 9
control” over their children. This was measured using items from the Multicultural
Inventory of Parenting Self-Efficacy, which the Arizona State team had developed in
2002. It asks questions such as “How good are you at praising (your child) and giving
him/her encouragement? … How good are you at teaching (your child)? … How good are
you at keeping control over (your child)?” (p. 527).
2. Actual parenting behavior, which was measured with questions of whether the mother
had clearly communicated punishments to the child and followed through on them and
whether the mother knew of the child’s whereabouts (p. 527).
3. Actual adolescent outcomes, a measure composed of reports from the mother, the teen
him or herself, and two teachers (p. 527-528).
The team concluded that the study demonstrated the generalizability of Bandura’s theories
in a cross-cultural setting (Dumka, Gonzales, Wheeler & Millsap, 2010, p. 531). A belief that
mothers could positively control their children led to more control, which led to fewer
problems among the children of high self-efficacy mothers.
Our results … showed that Mexican American mothers’ PSE (parental self-efficacy) had
direct causal links with adolescents’ levels of conduct problems. … Adolescents’ self-efficacy
may develop in response to observing their parents. Mexican American adolescents with
parents who express high self-efficacy may develop confidence in their own abilities, which
in turn, may lead to better outcomes including decreased conduct problems (p. 531).
A study by Spoth, Redmond, Haggerty, and Ward, which used a very different design but
asked similar questions, found a similar effect (1995, p. 449-464). Essentially, using a complex
regression model, they showed that interventions aimed at increasing parents’ self-efficacy (1)
did increase efficacy and (2) led to fewer problems among the adolescent children of those
parents (p. 460). In additional to differences in scope and design, the Spoth, et al, study also
10. Community Engagement and Authentic Modeling: A Social Cognitive Theory of Change 10
looked at the effect on fathers in addition to mothers. The effect held true, but fathers had
smaller increases in efficacy as a result of exposure to the messaging (p. 460).
Adolescent Eating Behaviors
In a more modest but nonetheless relevant study, scholars looked to see how social-
cognitive factors such as self-efficacy influenced adolescent eating behavior (Ball, et al, 2009).
They start with the knowledge that socioeconomic status is a strong predictor of diet, with
higher SES teens eating healthier foods (p. 496).
They found that a significant mediating factor to SES on diet was self-efficacy,
specifically (1) knowledge about a healthy diet, (2) a belief that the teen was capable of
obtaining, preparing, and enjoying healthy food, and (3) a conviction that a healthy diet could
make a positive contribution to their well-being (p. 502). As a result, they call for “health
promotion efforts (that) focus on cognitive factors such as self-efficacy and the value attached
to health-promoting behaviors” (Ball, et al, 2009, p. 502).
Message Enrichment via Engagement
Leung (2009) defines psychological empowerment essentially as the process of gaining
self-efficacy, along with successful action based on that efficacy (p. 1330). “Empowerment,” he
writes, “is a process through which people gain mastery over their lives, improve strengths and
competencies and develop proactive behaviors to manage their social affairs” (p. 1330).
He then defines civic engagement as involvement in the decisions that affect us, and
says there is “strong theoretical and empirical support for the idea that psychological
empowerment and civic participation are linked” (p. 1330). Meanwhile, self-efficacy itself
provides the mechanism through which people can effectively engage civically, as it reflects on
11. Community Engagement and Authentic Modeling: A Social Cognitive Theory of Change 11
individual’s perceptions that they have the social and political skills necessary to participate,
including knowledge about how to obtain the resources needed to act(Leung, 2009, p. 1330).
He specifically looked at (1) whether people who generate content online had higher
self-efficacy than those that do not, and (2) whether the creating of content developed
psychological empowerment that manifested itself in civic engagement (p. 1327). There were
several limitations to his study and his findings were mixed (pp. 1341-1345). Nonetheless,
Leung’s research suggests a promising avenue to investigate while building an intervention
program based on social cognitive theory.
Seeing is Believing. Doing is Knowing.
Directly engaging target audiences in the development of a public health messaging
campaign has the potential to increase the effects of social cognitive approaches. Various forms
of outreach -- focus groups, surveys, social media, community forums, etc. -- can allow for the
collection valuable information that can (1) provide opportunities for baseline data collection,
(2) lead to a better understanding of the gaps in knowledge about available local resources, and
(3) utilize this data much like a strategic planner to tailor a campaign for maximum effect. As
Glanz and Bishop note:
The most successful public health programs and initiatives are based on an
understanding of health behaviors and the context in which they occur. Strategic
planning models provide a structured framework for developing and managing public
health interventions and improving them through evaluation (2010, p. 400)
But in addition to serving this planning and evaluation purpose, I believe
engagementcan also increase efficacy in and of itself. People who voluntarily attend community
functions are likely to have greater self-efficacy than those who do not before they even walk in
the door. But there are other ways of recruiting subjects with lower self-efficacy, such as direct
12. Community Engagement and Authentic Modeling: A Social Cognitive Theory of Change 12
intervention in schools (if the target audience is teen mothers, for instance), and focus groups
that offer incentives for participation. By partaking in these experiences, recruited participants
will see that they do, in fact, have the skills needed to participate in a conversation about
parenting. It will also expose them to other parenting models and opportunities for positive
reinforcement.
The community can also be the source of images, slogans, and ideas for a campaign. For
those who are directly involved, interest and attention are likely to be very high. For the others,
they’ll see members of their own community modeling appropriate parental behavior. This will
make the message more authentic, and therefore believable. It should also increase attention -
hey, that’s my neighbor! - as well as identification. If the mom I pass in Wegmans each week
can calm her child using a timeout strategy, perhaps I can too.
Leveraging Individual & Community
Drawing on the social ecological model, community engagement may also help create
the climate for better parenting throughout a community, leading to population-level effects.
As a team from the University of Exeter writes,
The social environment comprising communities, families, neighborhoods, work teams,
and various other forms of social group is not simply an external feature of the world
that provides context for individual behavior. Instead these groups impact on the
psychology of individuals through their capacity to be internalized as part of a person’s
identity. If groups provide individuals with a sense of meaning, purpose, and belonging,
(i.e. a positive sense of social identity) they tend to have positive psychological
consequences (Haslman, Jetten, Postmes & Haslam, 2009, p. 1).
Waters, Cross, and Runions (2009) found some evidence of this effect. Their study
concluded that an adolescent’s feelings of “connectedness” to her or her school was positively
correlated with the teen’s health and well-being (p. 516). Further, the study team found a
13. Community Engagement and Authentic Modeling: A Social Cognitive Theory of Change 13
strong correlation between the structural characteristics of a school and the connectedness
effect. Positive structural factors included small school size, levels of teacher collegiality, clear
and fair expectations for discipline, student involvement in decision making, and high
expectations (p. 520). In other words, their approach holds the possibility that school-level
adjustments may do more to change individual-level behavior than individual-level
interventions.
Hypotheses
Given this state of affairs, I propose that:
H1: Media campaigns that incorporate authentic content generated from a specific
community via public outreach will increase attention to the media messages within that
community.
H2: Media campaigns that incorporate authentic content generated from a specific
community via public outreach will increase identification with the messages within that
community.
H3:There is an interaction between engagement and self-efficacy such that:
1. Those that voluntarily attend engagement events such as a community forum
will begin the process with higher self-efficacy than harder-to-reach individuals.
2. Self-efficacy will increase for individuals directly engaged by the engagement
effort, whether they are engaged voluntarily or more deliberately recruited and
enticed to participate.
3. Those who directly participate in the creation of the messaging by supplying
ideas, photos, votes, Facebook “likes,” etc., will experience a greater increase in
14. Community Engagement and Authentic Modeling: A Social Cognitive Theory of Change 14
self-efficacy than the target community members who do not actively
participate.
Born Learning Cayuga: A Social Cognitive Laboratory
Fortunately, an opportunity to test these hypotheses has emerged. A coalition of
foundations, nonprofits, and community groups has come together to launch a public health
campaign built off of a community engagement model around the issue of early childhood
development and parenting. Moreover, they’ve approached both the author and his mentor,
Syracuse University Professor Makana Chock, to help with the effort.
This coalition has requested surveys, focus groups, a series of op-ed pieces, a website, a
logo contest, and other tools all with the purpose of:
1. Increasing awareness of the importance of early childhood development;
2. Promoting the positive aspects of investing in early childhood development;
3. Spreading knowledge about best practices and available community resources;
4. Creating buzz and excitement within the community around the prospect of increasing
individual and community well-being by propagating positive and successful child-
rearing models.
Interestingly, they have not uttered the phrases “social cognitive theory” or “self-efficacy,”
but clearly the members of this coalition have an innate sense of the power of Bandura’s
insights. There’s a good chance that we’ll be able to work evaluative instruments into the effort
to help guide it, and to test the above hypotheses. I am particularly keen to involve the
community directly in content creation, and to measure the effect on self-efficacy of such an
approach.
15. Community Engagement and Authentic Modeling: A Social Cognitive Theory of Change 15
References
Ball, K., MacFarlane, A., Crawford, D., Savige, G., Andrianopoulos, N., & Worsley, A. (2009). Can
social cognitive theory constructs explain socio-economic variations in adolescent eating
behaviors? A mediation analysis. Health Education Research. 24(3), 496-506.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3 (3),
pp. 265-299.
Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a Psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological
Science. 1(2), pp. 164-180.
Brown, W., Basil, M. (1995). Media celebrities and public health: responses to 'Magic'
Johnson's HIV disclosure and its impact on AIDS risk and high-risk behaviors. Health
Communication, 7(4), 345-366.
Dumka, L., Gonzales, N., Wheeler, L., and Millsap, R. (2010). Parenting self-efficacy and
parenting practices over time in Mexican American Families. Journal of Family
Psychology. 24(5), 522-531, doi: 10.1037/a0020833
Florin, P., and Wandersman, A. (1984). Cognitive social learning and participation in community
development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 12(6), 689-708.
Freedman, D., Bess, K., Tucker, H., Boyd, D., Tuchman, A., and Wallston, K. (2009). Public Health
Literacy Defined. American Journal of Preventative Medicine , 36 (5), 446-451.
Glanz, G., and Bishop, D. (2010). The role of behavioral science theory in development and
implementation of public health interventions. Annual Review of Public Health, 31, 399-
418.
Glasgow, R., and Emmons, K. (2007). How can we increase translation of research into practice?
16. Community Engagement and Authentic Modeling: A Social Cognitive Theory of Change 16
Types of evidence needed. Annual Review of Public Health, 28, 413-433.
Grason, H., Hess, C., VanLandeghem, K., Silver, G., Brown, B., and Schor, E. (2004). Integrating
Measures of Early Childhood Health and Development into State Title V Maternal and
Child Health Services Block Grant Plans. From the Women’s and Children’s Health Policy
Center, John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, with support from the
Commonwealth Fund, 1-22.
Haslam, S.A., Jetten, J., Postmes, T., and Halslam, C. (2009). Social identity, health, and well-
being: an emerging agenda for applied psychology. Applied Psychology: An International
Review, 58(1), 1-23, doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00379.x
Kirkham, M., Schinke, S., Schilling II, R, Meltzer, N., and Norelius, K. (1986). Cognitive-behavioral
skills, social supports, and child abuse potential among mothers of handicapped
children. Journal of Family Violence, 1(3), 1986.
Kontos, E., Emmons, K., Puleo, E., Viswanath, K. (2010). Communication inequities and public
health implications of adult social networking site use in the United States. Journal of
Health Communication, 2010, 15(3), 216-235, doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.522689
Leung, L. (2009). User-generated content on the internet: an examination of gratifications, civic
engagement and psychological empowerment. New Media & Society, 11(8), 1327-1347.
Middlebrooks, J., and Audage, N. (2008). The Effects of Childhood Stress on Health Across the
Lifespan. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control:
Atlanta, GA, USA. At http://health-equity.pitt.edu/932/1/Childhood_Stress.pdf.
Pajares, F., Prestin, A., Chen, J., and Nabi, R. (2009). Social cognitive theory and media effects.
In The SAGE Handbook of Media Processes and Effects, Nabi and Oliver (Eds.), Sage
17. Community Engagement and Authentic Modeling: A Social Cognitive Theory of Change 17
Publications Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA
Sameroff, A. (2010). A unified theory of development: a dialectic integration of nature and
nature. Child Development, 81(1), 6-22.
Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Haggerty, K., and Ward, T. (1995). A controlled parenting skills outcome
study examining individual differences and attendance effects. Journal of Marriage and
Family, 57(2), 449-464.
Swearer, S., Espelage, D., Vaillancourt, T., and Hymel, S. (2010). What can be done about school
bullying? Linking Research to educational practice. Educational Researcher, 39 (1), 38-
47, doi: 10.3102/0013189x09357622
Waters, S., Cross, D., Runions, K. (2009). Social and ecological structures supporting adolescent
connectedness to school: a theoretical model. Journal of School Health, 79(11), 516-524.