Facilitating Student Success Across the P-20 Continuum
•Télécharger en tant que PPTX, PDF•
1 j'aime•841 vues
Over 40 states have created P-16/P-20 councils in order to lead their states towards student learning continuity and success pre-K through post secondary education. One promising development that has emerged from these councils is the focus on individualized learning and success. Learn how all 50 states are leveraging individualized learning to improve student outcomes throughout P-20. Receive Hobsons recent survey of 50 states practice relative to individualized learning. Todd Bloom, Hobsons Chief Academic Officer
Recommandé
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Tendances
Tendances (20)
Similaire à Facilitating Student Success Across the P-20 Continuum
Similaire à Facilitating Student Success Across the P-20 Continuum (20)
Plus de Hobsons
Plus de Hobsons (20)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
Facilitating Student Success Across the P-20 Continuum
- 1. Facilitating Student Success Across the P-20 Continuum EPI RETENTION 2012
- 2. Welcome & Overview 35 minute context-setting Three macro forces influencing P-20 education State/Federal policy and individualizing student learning 10 minute participant discussion 15 minute participant problem-solving 5 minute wrap 2 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 3. Hobsons K-12 and Higher Education Student and Institutional Success College and career planning; admissions, enrollment, retention 5,550 K-12 schools, 2,200 higher education clients 3 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 4. Facts About Your Students 947,000 students in the NAVIANCE class of 2011 2.9 million college applications tracked (avg. 3.1 apps/student) 5.5 apps per student in private schools 2.6 apps per student in public schools 12.4% were Early Admit/Early Decision vs. 10.2% for class of 2010 (22% increase) 14% increase for private schools 25% increase for public schools Most popular career search keyword Engineer; engineering Most popular saved career Lawyer 4 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 5. Facts About Your Students 5 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 6. Facts About Your Students 6 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 7. Facts About Your Students Of 10 million K-12 course history records… Most common course subject failed is Algebra I (by a 50% margin over any other subject) Geometry, Biology and English I are the next most common 7 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 8. Global Economic Competitiveness “The goal for America’s educational system is clear: Every student should graduate from high school ready for college and a career by 2020. We must lead the world in college completion by 2020” – President Obama We’re in 16th place and we’ve heard this before… • 1983 – A Nation at Risk (standards) • 1994 – Goals 2000 (performance targets) • 2001 – No Child Left Behind (accountability) • 2009 – ARRA/Race to the Top 8 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 9. Global Economic Competitiveness Skeptical practitioners – The college completion goal http://chronicle.com/article/A-Crisis-of-Confidence/127530/ 9 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 10. Global Economic Competitiveness Supply and demand challenge: “In 15 years, the U.S. will be 1,000,000 degreed students short in order to fill U.S. jobs – 1,000,000 good- paying, professional jobs will need to be “outsourced”. (Bruce Vandal, Director, Postsecondary & Workforce Development Institute, Education Commission of the States, 2010) 10 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 11. Global Economic Competitiveness 11 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 12. Global Economic Competitiveness 12 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 13. Cost of Education – Buyer Cost for the buyer soars: • Total outstanding student debt = $1 trillion at the end of 2011 • Total U.S. student debt total grows by $2,853.88 each second • Average debt for 2010 college graduate = $25,250 (5% increase from 2009 – 2011 looks similar) 13 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 14. Cost of Education – K12 Provider Deep reductions to K- 12 state formula funding since the onset of the recession • ARRA has expired • Rainy day funds are exhausted • States have resisted raising additional taxes • Pressure on school districts • New School Year Brings Steep Cuts in State Funding for Schools (Center on Budget & Policy Priorities, Oct. 6, 2011) 14 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 15. Cost of Education – HE Provider 15 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 16. Consumer-Driven Education More than ever, education customers (students) have more informed choice Access to K-12 and HE institutional data to determine best SROI Growth of K-12 school choice (charters) and proliferation of postsecondary options Increase in college applications per student/HE cost per student enrollment However, choice is dependent on access to information, which is not afforded to all students… 16 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 17. Consumer-Driven Education The HE consumer “looks” different today • 17.6 M undergrads enrolled in US HE today • 37% of these undergrads are enrolled part-time • 32% of undergrads work full time • 36% of students in four-year colleges graduate in four years What are these buyer’s preferences and requirements? 17 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 18. Consumer-Driven Education And the consumer will “look” different in the future… K-12 student demographics (2010 to 2020) flat for students who are White; Black; increase 25% for students who are Hispanic; increase 36% for students who are Asian/Pacific Islander increase 17% for students who are American Indian/Alaska Native HE student demographics (2010 to 2020) flat for students who are White; American Indian/Alaska Native increase 25% for students who are Black; increase 46% for students who are Hispanic; increase 25% for students who are Asian/Pacific Islander The Center for Public Education 18 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 19. Consumer-Driven Education Demand for anywhere, anytime learning Distance education, hybrid models that blend online with face-to- face instruction (Rocketship Education) iTunesU, DIYU, Utube/edu “Small” colleges – Pepperdine U in Malibu AND Buenos Aires, Florence, Heidelberg, London, Shanghai, Switzerland The online universities 19 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 20. Macro Forces and Policy K-12 Postsecondary • Common Core State Standards • Emphasis on college completion and • Common state assessments “gainful employment” • Student growth monitoring and • Shifting finance models in response engagement to decreased state funding (Obama efficiency demand) • Teacher and principal effectiveness • SROI of remediation • Statewide P-20 data systems • Instructor effectiveness • Individualized Learning Plans • Student “recovery” RttT “carrot” … Waiver “carrot/stick” … ESEA “stick” 20 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 21. Strong Message: Personalize Learning Hobsons P-20 Advisory Board “No other org has been able to successfully assemble data to facilitate the career- education trajectory” “Too many students see $ as THE roadblock to postsecondary ed” “TurboTax or Mint.com for ed decision-making” “Consistent solution throughout P-20 – sticky” “Enable students to start their HE path earlier, if ready…dual enrollment” [Sample Board Members: Ron Huberman, JB Buxton, Margot Rogers, Larry Leverett, Eric Fingerhut, Bob Ptachik, Andy Rotherham, Barbara O’Brian] 21 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 22. Individualized Learning Plan The ILP and state policy 25 states plus the District of Columbia mandate ILPs 3 states mandate a guidance (no formal planning document) 22 states do not have a mandate, but… 9 provide ILP models 13 provide a guidance framework for districts to use Hobsons’ ILP State Report 22 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 23. Typical ILP Components The ILP and states’ policies Academic Planning Career Planning (career exploration, goal setting, resume builder) Regular ILP updates/sharing/review (annually is most common) Personal reflections Personality and learning style assessments Service learning capture Link to learning support services Portfolio 23 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 24. Pushing the ILP Discussion What student planning behaviors make a difference in CCR and postsecondary success? What should constitute a college “credential” – are there more data K-12 could provide to HE? What could HE send back??? How can we move beyond general “college ready” toward ready for “X College”/”X course at X college”? How can we assure students/society that poverty is not a barrier to educational success? How can we improve the “old school” career planning for all students? 24 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 25. Participant Engagement Whatever your role, what are your unit’s Key Performance Indicators? How are these KPIs aligned with what students report as their KPIs? You now have ½ the resources and 2x the performance expectations How does your unit change practice? 25 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
- 26. Thank You! Todd Bloom Chief Academic Officer Hobsons tbloom@hobsons.com (952) 807-5345 Todd_Bloom@twitter.com 26 EPI Retention 2012 Conference
Notes de l'éditeur
- More time in college does NOT equal success (after 6 years = 65% graduation rate; after 8 years = 58%)When you start makes a difference (immediately after HS = 50% completion rate; wait a year after HS = 25% completion rate)Full-time students graduate at 3-4 times the rate of part-time students
- Enrollment in pubic institutions is increasing beyond what the state can bear – shift burden to student. This creates inequities when the state cannot support a social good of fair access to high quality education. Being poor becomes a more significant barrier to social mobility and national strength.
- College confidential, search tools – Supermatch, web-based “visits”
- BIG differences between K-12/HE students and those who pay…65+ population is expected to grow from 12%in 2000 to 13% in 2010, to 16%in 2020, and to over 19%in 2030.