Presented by Jan Philipsson, Emelie Zonabend, Erling Strandberg, James Audho, Julie Ojango and Okeyo Mwai at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) Global Workshop, Uganda, December 2012
Uganda, December 2012
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Animal genetic resources for improved productivity under harsh environmental conditions
1. Animal Genetic Resources
for improved productivity
under harsh environmental conditions
Jan Philipsson, Emelie Zonabend, Erling Strandberg
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsla Sweden
James Audho, Julie Ojango, Okeyo Mwai
International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) Global Workshop,
Uganda, December 2012
2. Animal Genetic Resources
for sustainable use in developing countries
70% of livestock breeds found in developing countries
- indigenous breeds in SSA often adapted to harsh conditions
Huge ruminant populations but many animals unproductive
Lack of long term breeding strategies and neglect of the
genetic potential of some indigenous breeds
Market forces introduced exotic breeds for short term gains
- Indiscriminate ”upgrading” of indigenous breeds
Many valuable indigenous breeds become endangered
3. The Challenge in use of Animal Genetic
Resources in Developing Countries
Meet increasing demands for Must utilize the potential of
food of animal origin on an the AnGR and increase the
increasingly competitive market productivity per animal!
without environmental
degradation of land and water Develop relevant Animal
Breeding Programs
considering the needs
for future genetic diversity
The present study involves two
endangered indigenous breeds
TT
with specifically valuable attributes
4. Trypanotolerance of indigenous cattle
breeds in tsetse infested areas of Ethiopia
Trypanosomosis (sleeping sickness)
– one of the most disastrous animal diseases in the
tropics with the tsetse fly as vector
Sub-Saharan Africa
60 million heads of cattle
exposed to risk
3 million heads lost annually
Ethiopia
Trypanosomosis covers 15 % of all arable
land and hinders human inhabitation
10 - 14 million heads of cattle exposed to risk
5. Some breeds show “trypanotolerance”
Capacity of an animal to control the development of the
parasites and to limit their pathological effects
Four indigenous breeds in SW Ethiopia investigated
Collaboration with Ethiopian Institute for Agricultural Research
Farmer interviews – perceptions about diseases
Field investigations by blood analyses for PCV
and parasitaemia
On station comparison of breeds for production,
diseases and survival
Abigar Gurage Horro Sheko
6. Trypanosomosis - Infection rate
Sheko - superior trypanotolerance in all three studies
but is an endangered breed – needs to be conserved!
7. Breeding for Trypanotolerance
Results presented in a PhD thesis
and shared at a workshop with all
Ethiopian stakeholders
The remaining issue is how to
conserve the breed and disseminate
genes for trypanotolerance to the
broader livestock populations in
tsetse infested areas of Ethiopia
MoA taken results onboard for
translation of results into practice
including a proposal to IFAD for
action research
8. The case of
Red Maasai sheep
Indigenous breed kept in Kenya
and neighbouring countries
Indiscriminately crossed with
Dorper for better meat production
Red Maasai population drastically
declining – endangered breed
Recurrent severe droughts show
higher survival of Red Maasai
How to conserve Red Maasai
sheep and increase productivity
for food security and better
livelihood?
9. The Dorper breed
Imported from South Africa
Composite breed of Dorset
and Blackhead Persian
breeds
Meat type breed
Not adopted to harsh
climatic conditions
– problem to survive droughts
Uncontrolled crossbreeding
with Red Maasai
11. Materials and methods
Pilot sheep recording scheme
in two Maasai village areas
Data on live weights, fertility
and health for farmer information
and genetic analyses
- similar data from two research ranches (Kapiti and Naivasha)
Baseline study on production system, markets and social
aspects of sheep production
- extra focus on gender issues
Interviews for assessment of breeding objectives
Design of alternative breeding strategies
Outreach workshops for sharing results and for
capacity building
12. Recording growth, health and fertility
on Red Maasai, Dorper sheep and their crosses
Fertility Ear tagging Defining age
Interviews Linear Measurements Weighing
13. Breeding objectives
set by interviewing farmers and middlemen and butchers
Farmers Middlemen
Farmers Middlemen
Butchers
Butchers
15. What farmers want to improve in their ewes
Relative percentage of responses
16. Potential breeding strategy
Red Maasai Sheep
Constitutes the main female flock
Purebreeding for improvement of maternal and survival traits
partly used for crossbreeding to produce slaughter lambs
Dorper Sheep
Use as terminal ram breed for controlled crossbreeding to
produce slaughter lambs
Selection for growth, health and survival
17. Outcomes and Implications
Closer links between the pastoralists, the local stakeholders,
ILRI and SLU in research for development efforts leading to:
- Increased interest for improvement of indigenous animal genetic
resources as a pathway out of poverty
- Change in animal selection practices within communities
- Enhanced awareness and access to market information and
alternative markets by livestock keepers
Sharing of collective partner experiences and building on
these to ensure better joint outcomes
18. Way forward for the collaboration
Build on the results and achievements to jointly secure
resources in order to deliver results to scale (i.e. to other
regions and countries) and inform future action-research
designs and plans in the region
Target private partners to support innovative livestock
recording systems and community based breeding programs
in developing countries
Broaden the partnership to include other disciplines from
either parties
Attract more and facilitate younger SLU scientists´
participation to ensure continuity
An example of long-standing fruitful
cooperation between SLU and ILRI
19. better lives through livestock
ilri.org
The presentation has a Creative Commons license. You are free to re-use or distribute this work, provided credit is given to ILRI.
Notes de l'éditeur
There MUST be a CGIAR logo or a CRP logo. You can copy and paste the logo you need from the final slide of this presentation. Then you can delete that final slide To replace a photo above, copy and paste this link in your browser: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ilri/sets/72157632057087650/detail/ Find a photo you like and the right size, copy and paste it in the block above.
In most developing countries the picture is rather different -the environment variable and so also the production systems, even within a village you can find many different production systems –imagine with a country. -the feed supply and vet services may be lacking –for example where I am having my project working southern Kenya there is basically no feed and no veterinary access... -very little infrastructure is usually available, in Africa for example only South Africa, Botswana and Kenya has a functioning recording system. -People from the west and industrilized countries often tell that their animals are better and they produce so much –they are brought to the developing country and people start to crossbred without having a strict plan for it and the exotic breed is not adopted to the environment -and in the end the whole flock may die when the environment changes slightly. -We have seen so many breeding strategies starting up and they say it will improve the breed through crossbreeding –and so far everything is fine –but than it becomes uncontrolled and they have no long term strategies how to keep it and it all fails It is soo common to see indigenous breeds that are well adopted to its environment, that has a rather low productivity –and instead of keeping that breed and select among it and breed for an increase productivity people just bring in exotic breeds that they have to keep feeding sooo much.... What we need to do is to realize the potential in exotic breeds and increase the productivity of those. -some examples are these ones... Do you think our sheep would survive here? Do you think they have a well developed feed/vet/and infrastructure set up? –no they have to stand this dry environment and eat only this soil...
Glossina spp. Found in warm and humid mid altitude areas in riverine vegetation, savannah woodlands and woody forests Ethiopia 10-14 million heads of cattle an equivalent number of small ruminants, horses and camels are exposed to the risk of trypanosomosis.
The four breeds investigated are the Abigar, Gurage, Horro and Sheko. The Sheko breed is the only remaining Bos taurus breed in eastern Africa, and is anecdotally believed to be trypanotolerant. According to a recent census count there are only approximately 2400 Sheko animals. The livestock keepers in the area also perform more or less uncontrolled crossbreeding with local Zebu, and the Sheko is therefore classified as endangered.
Important that keepers know how to correctly diagnose trypanosomosis Abigar 23 % Gurage 20 % Horro 17 % Sheko 5 %
The ability to survive and produce in tsetse infested areas! Humpless Longhorn 6000 B.C. Shorthorn 2500 B.C. Humped Zebu 700 A.D.
The Dorper breed was introduced in Kenya to increase weight gain of lambs and to get fast growing animals for a more demanding market for meat, primarily by use of crossbreeding. And it worked when years were food with rain and pasture. The issue was that farmers never got instructions about how to maintain a pure Red Maasai for a continuous crossbreeding program and many farmers continued to “ upgrade ” their local flocks by crossing with Dorper even though it was not really suitable for some of the harsh environments.
The introduction of the Dorper breed really led to indiscriminate crossbreeding all across the country. Nowadays it is hard to travel in the field and find pure bred Red Maasai Sheep
We started with baseline surveys about the homestead and production system of the farmers by interviewing them. All sheep were ear tagged to get the identities secured. Thereafter we have set up an individual sheep recording system as a pilot scheme where we record weights at different ages and taking linear body measurements, and also health, fertility and survival. All the measurements are recorded continuously ever third month. The data are stored in a database at ILRI and SLU.
Now we have just finished the field part where we are trying set the breeding objectives for the sheep. In this part we are using a participatory approach. All individual farmers, selected the best, average and the poorest ewe in each breed group, Red Maasai, Dorper and crosses, in their own flock; and also the best young rams. Then the farmers had to give reasons to clarify why that animal was best, average or poor. A similar approach was used with middlemen and butchers. The butchers also evaluated carcasses in a specific study. With the information from our records and interviews, including farmer ’ s desires and market demands, we will develop inclusive and robust breeding objectives. Thereafter selection criteria and alternative breeding strategies to sustainably improve flock productivity and profitability will be simulated. Analyses of all these data, will give results needed to develop tools to be used for selection of strong, healthy and meaty animals that survive the harsh climate and that are still productive in line with preferences of both farmers and butchers. By the use of simulation studies we will simulate the best alternatives of breeding programs to recommend for farmers including both pure breeding and controlled crossbreeding.