Appendix To Design Patterns For Mixed-Method Research
•
0 j'aime•5 vues
This document provides an appendix to a paper on design patterns for mixed-method research in HCI. It includes the full reference list and classification results from an empirical literature study of 40 papers from the NordiChi 2012 conference proceedings. The papers were classified into six patterns: Validated Solution, Field Reframing, Rigor Cycle, Parameter Discovery, Transformative Design, and Relevance Cycle. Tables 2-8 provide the classification results, listing each paper under the pattern it was assigned and noting any combination of patterns.
![Appendix to:
Design Patterns for Mixed-Method Research in HCI
Koen van Turnhout, Arthur Bennis, Sabine Craenmehr, Robert Holwerda, Marjolein Jacobs,
Ralph Niels, Lambert Zaad, Stijn Hoppenbrouwers, Dick Lenior, René Bakker.
HAN University of Applied Sciences
Academy of Information Technology and Communication
[Koen.vanTurnhout, Arthur.Bennis, Sabine.Craenmehr, Robert.Holwerda, Marjolein.Jacobs,
Ralph.Niels, Lambert.Zaad, Stijn.Hoppenbrouwers, Dick.Lenior, Rene.Bakker] @ han.nl
ABSTRACT
In this appendix we present the full reference list and
classification results of our empirical literature study as
presented in the paper Design Patterns for Mixed-Method
Research in HCI [a].
INTRODUCTION
In ‘Design Patterns for Mixed-Method Research in HCI’ we
presented an empirical literature study of an a-select sample
of 40 papers taken from the NordiChi 2012 proceedings. This
appendix lists our full. The set of papers was classified in to
three fully described patterns and three ‘candidate patters’
which were only deliniated. Table 1 lists the division of
papers across (candidate) patterns as presented in [a].
Table 1: Patterns which were found
Number of
papers
Validated Solution 11
Field Reframing 10
Rigor Cycle 9
Parameter Discovery 4
Transformative Design 3
Relevance Cycle 1
Unclassified 2
CLASSIFICATION RESULTS
In this section we present the full classification results of the
empirical literature study. We have chosen to group the
references according to the pattern which was assigned.
Some combine multiple patterns or execute a study which is
not part of the pattern in the strict sense of definition. These
are listed in the column ‘combination’. What follows is a
listing of the results. able 2 lists papers classified as
Validated Solution; Table 3 lists papers classified as Field
Reframing; Table 4 lists papers classified as Rigor Cycle;
Table 5 lists papers classified as Parameter Discovery; Table
6 lists papers classified as Transformative Design; Table 7
lists the paper classified as Relevance Cycle; Table 8 lists the
unclassified papers.
Table 2: Papers classified as Validated Solution
VALIDATED SOLUTION
Reference Combination
1 Alt et al [1] with Showroom
2 Ardito et al [3]
3 Dalsgaard & Halskov [9] with Showroom
4 Freitag et al [12]
5 Hansen et al [19] with Showroom
6 Harris [20]
7 Honkala & Yanqing [21]
8 McGookin et al [30] with Showroom
9 Medhi et al [31]
10 Rodil et al [34]
11 Veen et al [39]
Table 3: Papers classified as Field Reframing
FIELD REFRAMING
Reference Combination
1 Blythe et al [4] with Workshop, without Showroom
2 Brown et al [5]
3 Følstad et al [11]
4 Giusti et al [13] with Lab
5 Gonçalves et al [14] with Lab
6 Grubert et al [16] with Validated Solution
7 Häkkilä et al [17] without Showroom
8 Kinnula et al [24]
9 Kuusinen et al [26] without Showroom
10 Nylander [32]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/appendixtodesignpatternsformixed-methodresearch-230806191458-401cd127/85/Appendix-To-Design-Patterns-For-Mixed-Method-Research-1-320.jpg)
![Table 4: Papers classified as Rigor Cycle
RIGOR CYCLE
Reference Combination
1 Fass & Main [10]
2 Gonzalez [15]
3 Hansen & Dalsgaard [18] with Field
4 Iversen & Leong [22]
5 Knudsen et al [23] with Field
6 Kynsilehto & Olsson [27]
7 Laporte et al [28]
8 Stienstra et al [37]
9 Weiss et al [40]
Table 5: Papers classified as Parameter Discovery
PARAMETER DISCOVERY
Reference Combination
1 Andersen et al [2] with Showroom
2 Cuendet et al [8]
3 MacKenzie & Teather [29] with Workshop
4 Oeldorf-Hirsch et al [33] with Field
Table 6: Papers classified as Transformative Design
TRANSFORMATIVE DESIGN
Reference Combination
1 Clarke & Wright [7] Field, Workshop, Showroom
2 Korn & Back [25] Library, Field, Showroom
3 Seeburger [36] Library, Workshop, Lab
Table 7: Paper classified as Relevance Cycle
RELEVANCE CYCLE
Reference Combination
1 Ciolfi & McLoughlin [6] with Library
Table 8: Unclassified Papers
UNCLASSIFIED
Reference Combination
1 Roeck, De et al [35] Library, Field, Lab, Showroom
2 Syrjänen et al [38]
Library, Field, Workshop,
Showroom
REFERENCES
a. Koen van Turnhout, Arthur Bennis, Sabine Craenmehr,
Robert Holwerda, Marjolein Jacobs, Ralph Niels,
Lambert Zaad, Stijn Hoppenbrouwers, Dick Lenior, and
René Bakker. 2014. Design patterns for mixed-method
research in HCI. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic
Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun,
Fast, Foundational (NordiCHI '14). ACM, New York,
NY, USA, 361-370. DOI=10.1145/2639189.2639220
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2639189.2639220
REFERED PAPERS FROM THE DATASET
These papers appeared in Proceedings of the 7th Nordic
Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense
Through Design (NordiCHI '12). ACM, New York, NY,
USA.
1. Florian Alt, Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Albrecht Schmidt,
and Julian Mennenöh. 2012. Increasing the user's
attention on the web: using implicit interaction based on
gaze behavior to tailor content, 544-553.
2. Hans Jørgen Andersen, Ann Morrison, and Lars
Knudsen. 2012. Modeling vibrotactile detection by
logistic regression, 500-503.
3. C. Ardito, M. F. Costabile, G. Desolda, M. Matera, A.
Piccinno, and M. Picozzi. 2012. Composition of
situational interactive spaces by end users: a case for
cultural heritage, 79-88.
4. Mark Blythe, Jo Briggs, Patrick Olivier, and Jonathan
Hook. 2012. Digital originals: reproduction as a space
for design, 1-20.
5. Judith M. Brown, Gitte Lindgaard, and Robert Biddle.
2012. Joint implicit alignment work of interaction
designers and software developers, 693-702.
6. Luigina Ciolfi and Marc McLoughlin. 2012. Designing
for meaningful visitor engagement at a living history
museum, 69-78.
7. Rachel Clarke and Pete Wright. 2012. Evocative of
experience: crafting cross-cultural digital narratives
through stories and portraits, 318-321.
8. Sébastien Cuendet, Engin Bumbacher, and Pierre
Dillenbourg. 2012. Tangible vs. virtual representations:
when tangibles benefit the training of spatial skills, 99-
108.
9. Peter Dalsgaard and Kim Halskov. 2012. Tangible 3D
tabletops: combining tangible tabletop interaction and
3D projection, 109-118.
10.John Fass and Angus Main. 2012. Revealing the news:
how online news changes without you noticing, 757-
760.
11.Asbjørn Følstad, Effie Lai-Chong Law, and Kasper
Hornbæk. 2012. Outliers in usability testing: how to
treat usability problems found for only one test
participant?, 257-260.]()
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Similaire à Appendix To Design Patterns For Mixed-Method Research
Similaire à Appendix To Design Patterns For Mixed-Method Research (20)
Plus de Jennifer Roman
Plus de Jennifer Roman (20)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
Appendix To Design Patterns For Mixed-Method Research
- 1. Appendix to: Design Patterns for Mixed-Method Research in HCI Koen van Turnhout, Arthur Bennis, Sabine Craenmehr, Robert Holwerda, Marjolein Jacobs, Ralph Niels, Lambert Zaad, Stijn Hoppenbrouwers, Dick Lenior, René Bakker. HAN University of Applied Sciences Academy of Information Technology and Communication [Koen.vanTurnhout, Arthur.Bennis, Sabine.Craenmehr, Robert.Holwerda, Marjolein.Jacobs, Ralph.Niels, Lambert.Zaad, Stijn.Hoppenbrouwers, Dick.Lenior, Rene.Bakker] @ han.nl ABSTRACT In this appendix we present the full reference list and classification results of our empirical literature study as presented in the paper Design Patterns for Mixed-Method Research in HCI [a]. INTRODUCTION In ‘Design Patterns for Mixed-Method Research in HCI’ we presented an empirical literature study of an a-select sample of 40 papers taken from the NordiChi 2012 proceedings. This appendix lists our full. The set of papers was classified in to three fully described patterns and three ‘candidate patters’ which were only deliniated. Table 1 lists the division of papers across (candidate) patterns as presented in [a]. Table 1: Patterns which were found Number of papers Validated Solution 11 Field Reframing 10 Rigor Cycle 9 Parameter Discovery 4 Transformative Design 3 Relevance Cycle 1 Unclassified 2 CLASSIFICATION RESULTS In this section we present the full classification results of the empirical literature study. We have chosen to group the references according to the pattern which was assigned. Some combine multiple patterns or execute a study which is not part of the pattern in the strict sense of definition. These are listed in the column ‘combination’. What follows is a listing of the results. able 2 lists papers classified as Validated Solution; Table 3 lists papers classified as Field Reframing; Table 4 lists papers classified as Rigor Cycle; Table 5 lists papers classified as Parameter Discovery; Table 6 lists papers classified as Transformative Design; Table 7 lists the paper classified as Relevance Cycle; Table 8 lists the unclassified papers. Table 2: Papers classified as Validated Solution VALIDATED SOLUTION Reference Combination 1 Alt et al [1] with Showroom 2 Ardito et al [3] 3 Dalsgaard & Halskov [9] with Showroom 4 Freitag et al [12] 5 Hansen et al [19] with Showroom 6 Harris [20] 7 Honkala & Yanqing [21] 8 McGookin et al [30] with Showroom 9 Medhi et al [31] 10 Rodil et al [34] 11 Veen et al [39] Table 3: Papers classified as Field Reframing FIELD REFRAMING Reference Combination 1 Blythe et al [4] with Workshop, without Showroom 2 Brown et al [5] 3 Følstad et al [11] 4 Giusti et al [13] with Lab 5 Gonçalves et al [14] with Lab 6 Grubert et al [16] with Validated Solution 7 Häkkilä et al [17] without Showroom 8 Kinnula et al [24] 9 Kuusinen et al [26] without Showroom 10 Nylander [32]
- 2. Table 4: Papers classified as Rigor Cycle RIGOR CYCLE Reference Combination 1 Fass & Main [10] 2 Gonzalez [15] 3 Hansen & Dalsgaard [18] with Field 4 Iversen & Leong [22] 5 Knudsen et al [23] with Field 6 Kynsilehto & Olsson [27] 7 Laporte et al [28] 8 Stienstra et al [37] 9 Weiss et al [40] Table 5: Papers classified as Parameter Discovery PARAMETER DISCOVERY Reference Combination 1 Andersen et al [2] with Showroom 2 Cuendet et al [8] 3 MacKenzie & Teather [29] with Workshop 4 Oeldorf-Hirsch et al [33] with Field Table 6: Papers classified as Transformative Design TRANSFORMATIVE DESIGN Reference Combination 1 Clarke & Wright [7] Field, Workshop, Showroom 2 Korn & Back [25] Library, Field, Showroom 3 Seeburger [36] Library, Workshop, Lab Table 7: Paper classified as Relevance Cycle RELEVANCE CYCLE Reference Combination 1 Ciolfi & McLoughlin [6] with Library Table 8: Unclassified Papers UNCLASSIFIED Reference Combination 1 Roeck, De et al [35] Library, Field, Lab, Showroom 2 Syrjänen et al [38] Library, Field, Workshop, Showroom REFERENCES a. Koen van Turnhout, Arthur Bennis, Sabine Craenmehr, Robert Holwerda, Marjolein Jacobs, Ralph Niels, Lambert Zaad, Stijn Hoppenbrouwers, Dick Lenior, and René Bakker. 2014. Design patterns for mixed-method research in HCI. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (NordiCHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 361-370. DOI=10.1145/2639189.2639220 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2639189.2639220 REFERED PAPERS FROM THE DATASET These papers appeared in Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design (NordiCHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 1. Florian Alt, Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Albrecht Schmidt, and Julian Mennenöh. 2012. Increasing the user's attention on the web: using implicit interaction based on gaze behavior to tailor content, 544-553. 2. Hans Jørgen Andersen, Ann Morrison, and Lars Knudsen. 2012. Modeling vibrotactile detection by logistic regression, 500-503. 3. C. Ardito, M. F. Costabile, G. Desolda, M. Matera, A. Piccinno, and M. Picozzi. 2012. Composition of situational interactive spaces by end users: a case for cultural heritage, 79-88. 4. Mark Blythe, Jo Briggs, Patrick Olivier, and Jonathan Hook. 2012. Digital originals: reproduction as a space for design, 1-20. 5. Judith M. Brown, Gitte Lindgaard, and Robert Biddle. 2012. Joint implicit alignment work of interaction designers and software developers, 693-702. 6. Luigina Ciolfi and Marc McLoughlin. 2012. Designing for meaningful visitor engagement at a living history museum, 69-78. 7. Rachel Clarke and Pete Wright. 2012. Evocative of experience: crafting cross-cultural digital narratives through stories and portraits, 318-321. 8. Sébastien Cuendet, Engin Bumbacher, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2012. Tangible vs. virtual representations: when tangibles benefit the training of spatial skills, 99- 108. 9. Peter Dalsgaard and Kim Halskov. 2012. Tangible 3D tabletops: combining tangible tabletop interaction and 3D projection, 109-118. 10.John Fass and Angus Main. 2012. Revealing the news: how online news changes without you noticing, 757- 760. 11.Asbjørn Følstad, Effie Lai-Chong Law, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2012. Outliers in usability testing: how to treat usability problems found for only one test participant?, 257-260.
- 3. 12.Georg Freitag, Michael Tränkner, and Markus Wacker. 2012. Enhanced feed-forward for a user aware multi- touch device, 578-586. 13.Leonardo Giusti, Kotval Xerxes, Amelia Schladow, Nicholas Wallen, Francis Zane, and Federico Casalegno. 2012. Workspace configurations: setting the stage for remote collaboration on physical tasks, 351-360. 14.Lígia Gonçalves, Pedro Campos, and Margarida Sousa. 2012. M-dimensions: a framework for evaluating and comparing interactive installations in museums, 59-68. 15.Berto Gonzalez, Erin Carroll, and Celine Latulipe. 2012. Dance-inspired technology, technology-inspired dance, 398-407. 16.Jens Grubert, Raphaël Grasset, and Gerhard Reitmayr. 2012. Exploring the design of hybrid interfaces for augmented posters in public spaces, 238-246. 17.Jonna Häkkilä, Jussi Huhtala, Ari-Heikki Sarjanoja, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2012. Price tags, maps, recipes: mobile phone photos for functional purposes, 41-44. 18.Nicolai Brodersen Hansen and Peter Dalsgaard. 2012. The productive role of material design artefacts in participatory design events, 665-674. 19.John Paulin Hansen, Arne John Glenstrup, Wang Wusheng, Li Weiping, and Wu Zhonghai. 2012. Collecting location-based voice messages on a TalkingBadge, 219-227. 20.Christopher G. Harris. 2012. VisualizIR: a game for identifying and categorizing relevant text in documents, 554-557. 21.Mikko Honkala and Yanqing Cui. 2012. Automatic on- device filtering of social networking feeds, 721-730. 22.Ole Sejer Iversen and Tuck W. Leong. 2012. Values-led participatory design: mediating the emergence of values, 468-477. 23.Søren Knudsen, Mikkel Rønne Jakobsen, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2012. An exploratory study of how abundant display space may support data analysis, 558-567. 24.Marianne Kinnula, Netta Iivari, and Tuula Ijäs. 2012. On the brink of adulthood: a qualitative study of adolescent engagement with the internet, 418-427. 25.Matthias Korn and Jon Back. 2012. Talking it further: from feelings and memories to civic discussions in and about places, 189-198. 26.Kati Kuusinen and Kaisa Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila. 2012. How to make agile UX work more efficient: management and sales perspectives, 139-148. 27.Minna Kynsilehto and Thomas Olsson. 2012. Checkpoints, hotspots and standalones: placing smart services over time and place, 209-218. 28.Lieve Laporte, Karin Slegers, and Dirk De Grooff. 2012. Using correspondence analysis to monitor the persona segmentation process, 265-274. 29.I. Scott MacKenzie and Robert J. Teather. 2012. FittsTilt: the application of Fitts' law to tilt-based interaction, 568-577. 30.David McGookin, Yolanda Vazquez-Alvarez, Stephen Brewster, and Joanna Bergstrom-Lehtovirta. 2012. Shaking the dead: multimodal location based experiences for un-stewarded archaeological sites, 199- 208. 31.Indrani Medhi, Mohit Jain, Anuj Tewari, Mohini Bhavsar, Michael Matheke-Fischer, and Edward Cutrell. 2012. Combating rural child malnutrition through inexpensive mobile phones, 635-644. 32.Stina Nylander. 2012. Changing my life one step at a time: using the twelve step program as design inspiration for long term lifestyle change, 711-720. 33.Anne Oeldorf-Hirsch, Jonathan Donner, and Edward Cutrell. 2012. How bad is good enough?: exploring mobile video quality trade-offs for bandwidth- constrained consumers, 49-58. 34.Kasper Rodil, Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, Kasper L. Jensen, and Matthias Rehm. 2012. Homestead creator: a tool for indigenous designers, 627-630. 35.Dries De Roeck, Karin Slegers, Johan Criel, Marc Godon, Laurence Claeys, Katriina Kilpi, and An Jacobs. 2012. I would DiYSE for it!: a manifesto for do-it- yourself internet-of-things creation, 170-179. 36.Jan Seeburger. 2012. No cure for curiosity: linking physical and digital urban layers, 247-256. 37.Jelle Stienstra, Miguel Bruns Alonso, Stephan Wensveen, and Stoffel Kuenen. 2012. How to design for transformation of behavior through interactive materiality, 21-30. 38.Anna-Liisa Syrjänen, Vesa Sihvola, Kari Kuutti, and Raisa Vilmunen. 2012. Human-to-human interfaces for remote service kiosks: the potential of audiovisual communication, 288-297. 39.Stefan Veen, Thomas Visser, and David V. Keyson. 2012. I heard you were on Facebook: linking awareness systems to online social networking, 703-706. 40.Benjamin Weiss, Ina Wechsung, and Stefanie Marquardt. 2012. Assessing ICT user groups, 275-283.