Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Traffic generation rates for high density residential developments - understanding the issues
1. Traffic Generation Rates for High Density
Residential Developments
- Understanding the issues
Josh Milston
2. • Context
• The current process
• Study approach & site selection
• Data analysis & key findings
• Recommended next steps
Today
Josh Milston
3. Context
• Cities are growing…..upwards
• Urban infill near public transport
nodes
• Traffic assessments have
significant implications for the
feasibility of new development
• Adopting an appropriate traffic
generation rate therefore
critical!
Josh Milston
4. • Context
• The current process
• Study approach & site selection
• Data analysis & key findings
• Recommended next steps
Josh Milston
5. • ‘Standard rate’ using RMS
guidelines
• Based entirely on quantum of
dwellings
• 0.19 vehicles / dwelling
(AM peak hour)
• 0.15 vehicles / dwelling
(PM peak hour)
• Determined via surveys at eight
high density residential
developments across Sydney
Josh Milston
As it now stands…..
6. Limitations….
• Rate based on a
single factor
(# dwellings)
• Determined by
surveys at only
eight sites
• High variability
• Non-weighted
average used to
determine the
‘standard’ rate
Josh Milston
A more robust approach to forecasting traffic generation from
high density residential developments is required.
7. • Context
• The current process
• Study approach & site selection
• Data analysis & key findings
• Recommended next steps
Josh Milston
8. Peak hour Dwellings Parking
Recommend approach to forecasting traffic generation
Multi-linear regression
Josh Milston
Data collection
Location
Influencing factors
Review of existing data
Site selection
11. • Context
• The current process
• Study approach & site selection
• Data analysis & key findings
• Recommended next steps
Josh Milston
12. Influence of peak hour
• ‘Paired-t’ test
• Tests wether there is a
statistical distinction
between trips generated
in the AM / PM peaks
• Analysis returned p-value
of 0.98
AM peak hour: 482 trips
PM peak hour: 483 trips
No statistical distinction between AM/PM peak hour traffic
generation rates
Josh Milston
14. Influence of dwelling and parking spaces
• Both quantum of parking
and dwellings display
strong relationship to
generated traffic
• Difficult to use both
variables in a single trip
generation formula
• Rate of parking
investigated as
influencing factor
Josh Milston
15. 1: Journey to work car mode share
2: Car/PT travel time to Sydney CBD
3: Accessibility to public transport score
(PTAL)
4: Walking distance to the nearest railway
station and bus stop
5: Employment and population density
Influence of location
?
Josh Milston
16. 0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
JTW Travel time PTAL Walk distance Emp/Pop density
Dwellings only Inc parking rate Inc location
Influence of location
R2value
Josh Milston
17. Key Findings
Traffic generation formula:
Ln(Total trips) = -0.95+ 0.01*totaldwellings+ 1.34*parksperdwelling + 1.67*JTWcarmodeshare
• Clear relationship between traffic
generation and the following factors:
• Number of dwellings
• Rate of parking in development
• Various accessibility factors
18. Predicted vs actual trips
RMS rates
(per dwelling)
Per
dwelling
Per dwelling, parking
space & accessibility
82%
58%
42%
31%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Per dwelling &
parking space
19. • Context
• The current process
• Study approach & site selection
• Data analysis & key findings
• Recommended next steps
Josh Milston
20. • Collect more data to increase
sample size
• Gather data at a wider
geographical spread of sites
• Gather data at sites with greater
variability in public transport
accessibility
• Determine appropriate measure
to assess how location of a site
influences the rate at which
traffic is generated
Next Steps
21. Josh Milston
• Forecasting traffic generation
is complex, but important!
• Dependent on a number of
factors
• Using a rate based on a single
variable is simplistic
• Surveying similar sites in
nearby areas should be
undertaken
Summing it up
Notes de l'éditeur
High demand for new housing driven by population growth
People willing to sacrifice land size for greater levels of accessibility
We wanted variability wrt parking ratio, access to PT and development size
98% chance difference we are seeing is by chance
Both time periods
Parking ratio linked to accessibility??
Average absolute difference between actual and forecast # vehicle trips
Arup per dwelling – 0.23
Greater spread in size of developments – model begins to break down beyond 350 dwellings
How do other factors, e.g. deomographics of residents, end employment location and provision of car share