Paper 4: Ranking Universities (Ince)
- International university rankings provide composite measures of academic quality, research output, teaching quality, and international reputation based on metrics like peer review surveys, citation counts, faculty-student ratios, and percentages of international students and faculty. - While rankings are not intended as strict league tables, they have significant real-world impacts by influencing government and university policies and priorities around the world as well as student choice. - Rankings also create competition between institutions to improve their standing through strategies like increasing research productivity, attracting top faculty and students internationally, and enhancing teaching quality and graduate employability.
![Ranking the world’s universities; why, how, and what happens when you do? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Tendances
Tendances (20)
En vedette
En vedette (20)
Similaire à Paper 4: Ranking Universities (Ince)
Similaire à Paper 4: Ranking Universities (Ince) (20)
Plus de Kent Business School
Plus de Kent Business School (20)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
Paper 4: Ranking Universities (Ince)
- 1. International Workshop on Performance Management Kent Business School Presentation by Martin Ince July 1, 2010
- 22. Who are they?
- 28. Ranking Criteria & Weights Peer Review Citations per Faculty Recruiter Review Int’l Faculty Int’l Students Student Faculty Ratio Peer Review – 40% Recruiter Review – 10% International Faculty – 5% International Students – 5% Student Faculty Ratio – 20% Citations per Faculty– 20%
- 41. Indicators & Weights for Established Aggregate Rankings QS HEEACT Shanghai Webometrics
- 60. QS Stars rating system
- 61. System Strength Rank Country System Access Flagship Economic Overall 1 United States 100 100 100 100 100 2 United Kingdom 99 96 100 98 98 3 Germany 95 96 94 92 95 4 Australia 93 98 98 87 94 5 Canada 91 96 98 83 92 6 Japan 92 79 98 89 90 7 France 87 79 97 83 87 8 Netherlands 91 83 95 75 86 9 Korea, South 76 73 95 74 80 10 Switzerland 83 71 98 62 79 11 Sweden 75 83 93 62 78 12 Belgium 74 77 93 58 76 13 New Zealand 66 82 94 60 75 14 Italy 70 94 76 59 75 15 China 76 25 95 98 74 16 Hong Kong 78 62 98 51 72 17 Ireland 67 79 96 47 72 18 India 67 39 78 100 71 19 Spain 62 81 77 49 67 20 Finland 59 79 87 42 67
Notes de l'éditeur
- Language This talk will tell you why the THES has decided to produce a ranking of the world’s universities, how it went about doing so, and what happened when we did.
- Eg startups and patents – big US bias
- Pasadenanow was in 2007, it is 10 and a half time zones from India
- Thomas Friedman, Hot Flat and Crowded
- Mark Leonard, What does China think?
- Praise QS
- Scopus. Publishing models change also Asian universities, and goes deeper
- So a subtle combination…
- Insult the French
- Mention US News
- werner
- $50 cf
- Nigel Healey
- Cf continental
- Reason/justification for choice of indicators: We have to pick things that are feasible to collect, we want to evaluate the broadest range of university activity that we can but keep the audit process feasible. It is likely other measures will b added in the future. Allocation of points: We have attempted to place a focus on the aspects of university strength that are considered conventionally more central – research, teaching etc. Then a read has been taken as to how effectively the indicator in question evaluates that aspect. To a certain extent the scores have been assigned based on the collective experience behind the Intelligence Unit – ... we have run this by a number of externals and presented in a number of places to seek feedback – which has been largely positive.