Publicité

Expression of cyanobacterial ictB in higher plants did not enhance photosynthesis.1111.pdf

Writer, Programmer, poez à LData
12 Mar 2023
Expression of cyanobacterial ictB in higher plants did not enhance photosynthesis.1111.pdf
Expression of cyanobacterial ictB in higher plants did not enhance photosynthesis.1111.pdf
Expression of cyanobacterial ictB in higher plants did not enhance photosynthesis.1111.pdf
Expression of cyanobacterial ictB in higher plants did not enhance photosynthesis.1111.pdf
Publicité
Expression of cyanobacterial ictB in higher plants did not enhance photosynthesis.1111.pdf
Expression of cyanobacterial ictB in higher plants did not enhance photosynthesis.1111.pdf
Expression of cyanobacterial ictB in higher plants did not enhance photosynthesis.1111.pdf
Expression of cyanobacterial ictB in higher plants did not enhance photosynthesis.1111.pdf
Expression of cyanobacterial ictB in higher plants did not enhance photosynthesis.1111.pdf
Prochain SlideShare
PZAKDYN_תעודת עבדות.pdfPZAKDYN_תעודת עבדות.pdf
Chargement dans ... 3
1 sur 9
Publicité

Contenu connexe

Publicité

Expression of cyanobacterial ictB in higher plants did not enhance photosynthesis.1111.pdf

  1. Expression of cyanobacterial ictB in higher plants did not enhance photosynthesis. 11/03/2023 [11.03.2023 15:47:45] False testimony [11.03.2023 16:27:33] The experiment first generation [11.03.2023 16:52:06] The experiment 2 generation [11.03.2023 17:03:41] Second Generation statistics Expression of cyanobacterial ictB in higher plants did not enhance photosynthesis. 11/03/2023 False testimony
  2. 11.03.2023 15:47:45 Date of creation "Never we didn't measure 37 plantsbushes" Said KKPLATZ And actually I measured 38 plantsbushes And as well KKPLATZ said that protein expression was not measured at any plant. There is not certaincy if the top plant express the protein And the slow plants don't. Possible that the first plants-bushes are not expressing the transcanister protein and thus have to be added towards wt... Then the only further is the second generation, speculating that correlation of the protein expression and good preformance is proven. It is doubted and not proven, we continue despite doubt.... The number of "good" bushes are 4 and more starting from 5 are not significant together... So, 4 bushes, are 9-10% from all the supposingly transcanister bushes, and the genetica say that AA two allelles should be 25% of the bushes 50% one allele and 25% no allele, and it is obligation to prove that the top 25% and the medium 50% have expression and the lower 25% pas... And KKPLATZ didn't prove. So the certainty is low, cuz be a goat, the correlation of the protein with performance is not proven. Also the 4 bushes are too few it is too little relative the expected 25%... And if one allele is also should improve performance then all 75% should have been efficient, and actually only 9-10%..... Then we took three bushes and planted a next generation...Then all should have been efficient cuz be a goat all with two alleles..Cuz it was stated that the protein efficiency is related towards the expression level...The best must express two alleles... HO actually the best bush is with most chances only single alleled...Cuz the transformation until transcanister is rare... Then 75% should behave as enhanced...And only 9-10% behave such way... The next generation, the first was unsignificant, second unsignificant, and third wt significant... Conclusion protein deesn't help... 12.03.2023 09:50:14 12.03.2023 09:50:14
  3. Return to top ^^ The experiment first generation 11.03.2023 16:27:33 Date of creation Two transcanister bushes were produced And from the two bushes First generation was emerged 38 Supposingly transcanister bushes And 7 wt Then measurement was performed And the chart [<{1}>] Clearly is seen that if all bushes are taken to a statistic T test, the wt are more efficient... HO We know from genetics that if the first generation is one allele only be cuz be a goat the
  4. chances of transcanistration, are low, and the first transcanister bushes are most probably with one allele..Thus the next generation is 25% both alleles 50% one allele and 25% no allele.. It was said that the protein should enhance if expressed fully, means two alleles..Or allele 1 enough if so 75% should have been enhanced...Actually 9-10%. Not very convincing... And the correlation of the protein and enhanced photosynthesis was not proven, and maybe the first bushes don't express the protein and should be added towards wt... All points are significant HO due to LOW Number of bushes the statistics of the genetika not resembles reality, should be at least 9-10 better performing bushes...and not 4...times 2,5~ and if one allele enough then times 7... 12.03.2023 09:50:14 12.03.2023 09:50:14 12.03.2023 09:50:14
  5. 12.03.2023 09:50:14 12.03.2023 09:50:14 12.03.2023 09:50:14
  6. 12.03.2023 09:50:14 12.03.2023 09:50:14
  7. Return to top ^^ The experiment 2 generation 11.03.2023 16:52:06 Date of creation The best 3 plants were grown ento next generation And then Measured And the chart show no significance 12.03.2023 09:50:15 Return to top ^^ Second Generation statistics 11.03.2023 17:03:41 Date of creation 2 plants show no significance 1 plant wt significant 2 generation unsignificant the bushes not better 12.03.2023 09:50:15
  8. 12.03.2023 09:50:15 12.03.2023 09:50:15 12.03.2023 09:50:15
  9. 12.03.2023 09:50:15 12.03.2023 09:50:15 Return to top ^^
Publicité