Presentation by Louise Cook at the LIS DREaM final conference.
More information about this event is available at http://lisresearch.org/dream-project/dream-event-5-conference-monday-9-july-2012/
1. Facets of DREaM: an Analysis of
Network Development to Support UK
LIS Research and Researchers
Louise Cooke
l.cooke@lboro.ac.uk
@DrVanvan
Senior Lecturer, Loughborough University
2. • Overview of the presentation:
– A bit of background context
– Data collection
– Some results and their meaning
– What does this tell us about DREaM and the LIS
Research Coalition?
– And what does it mean for us as individuals?
3. The Power of Networks
• A brain is a society of very small, simple
modules that cannot be said to be thinking,
that are not smart in themselves. But when
you have a network of them together, out of
that arises a kind of smartness. Kevin Kelly
4. Social Network Analysis
• Social Network Analysis:
– A research technique that focuses on relationships
between entities, rather than the attributes of the
entities themselves
– Underlying perspective that structure matters – by
analysing network composition and the position of
an actor within the network, we can gain a better
understanding of the world around us
5. Some example uses in LIS
• Some example uses in LIS:
– Citation analysis
– Technology diffusion and adoption
– Knowledge management
6. Ethical Issues
• Ethical issues:
– Data cannot usually be collected anonymously, but
it can be presented anonymously – but this can
reduce the meaning and impact of the
presentation
– Relationship ties can be a sensitive issue!
– Accurate interpretation of the meaning behind the
data is key
7. The Data Collection
• Data collection and analysis:
– Participants’ ‘awareness of the other’s knowledge,
expertise or experience’
– ‘Social or research-related interaction’
– Attribute data relating to gender and role
– Data analysed using Ucinet software to calculate
network statistics and Netdraw to visualise the
results
10. Workshop 1: Awareness - roles
Public Library Practitioner
Academic Librarian
Health Sector Practitioner
Other Sector Librarian
PhD Student
Academic or University Researcher
Other
11. Workshop 3: Awareness - roles
Public Library Practitioner
Academic Librarian
Health Sector Practitioner
Other Sector Librarian
PhD Student
Academic or University Researcher
Other
14. Workshop 1: Interaction - roles
Public Library Practitioner
Academic Librarian
Health Sector Practitioner
Other Sector Librarian
PhD Student
Academic or University Researcher
Other
15. Workshop 3: Interaction - roles
Public Library Practitioner
Academic Librarian
Health Sector Practitioner
Other Sector Librarian
PhD Student
Academic or University
Researcher
Other
16. Statistics: Overall Density
• Statistics: Overall density
– Awareness:
• Workshop 1: 0.1854, average no. of ties 6.6767
• Workshop 3: 0.4216, average no. of ties 13.9118
– Interaction:
• Workshop 1: 0.1944, average no. of ties 7.0
• Workshop 3: 0.3850, average no. of ties 12.7059
17. • What this indicates:
– The DREaM events have been very successful in
achieving the key aim of ‘developing a UK-wide
network of LIS researchers’
– The combination of using social media and
bringing people together face to face on a regular
basis is an effective mode of network building
– The central role of a few active individuals in
maintaining momentum has been key to this
success
18. Some questions and caveats
• A caveat and some questions:
– Network analysis is primarily based on
quantitative metrics – we also need to investigate
the qualitative indicators that help us to
understand our network
– The network patterns suggest network
connections have been made successfully – but
how do we ensure that these links are sustained
and extended?
– How important is it to you that they are?
Notes de l'éditeur
“ Do you think me a learned, well-read man?” “ Certainly”, replied Zi-gong, “Aren’t you?” “ Not at all” said Confucius. “I have simply grasped one thread which links up the rest”. Cited in Manuel Castells, The Network Age.
Discuss how you were invited to Edinburgh in October 2011 to present a session on SNA. Hazel wanted a ‘game’ so you decided to replicate an exercise previously carried out with AHRC workshop attendants in Loughborough. This had illuminated the increased connectivity among attendants as the workshops progressed.
First round at Workshop 1 in October 2011. Repeated (with some minor changes to questionnaire wording) in 3 rd workshop in April 2012. Data collected using paper questionnaire – ideally use online. Note ‘awareness’ didn’t imply f2f contact. Anonymised results presented during afternoon session (for first workshop) – participants haven’t yet seen the second set of results…