As experienced operators leave the industry, permit requirements tighten and new technologies and paradigms (resource recovery vs waste treatment) are introduced into treatment plants, utilities must find new ways of training their staff to meet the evolving challenges. This presentation describes how Utility Managers can use a state of the art process modeling platform called SimuWorks for enabling operator training and succession planning.
Call Girls In Okhla DELHI ~9654467111~ Short 1500 Night 6000
Knowledge Management: Using A “Flight Simulator” Concept To Support Succession Planning and Operator Training
1. Knowledge Management: Using A
“Flight Simulator” Concept To
Support Succession Planning and
Operator Training
Malcolm Fabiyi (PhD, MBA), Rajeev Goel (PhD, P.E, P. Eng.), Spencer
Snowling (PhD, P. Eng.)
Hydromantis
Eric Nelson, Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation
Department
Thomas Kutcher, Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati
2. Outline
• Overview
• Drivers of knowledge management
• The succession planning problem
• Role of simulators in wastewater treatment
• Case studies
• Demonstration
3. The last 100 years of wastewater treatment
1914
Adern & Locket
invent Activated
Sludge Process
1972
Clean Water Act
COD removal
1969
Cuyahoga River Fire
1970
EPA Established
Removal of solids and large organic matter
1990s
Growing concern
about Nutrients
(N,P)
2001
Regulations for N, P
added to NPDES
permits
MBR
Multistage, varying
Dissolved Oxygen
Biogas
Nutrient
recovery
CEC
Removal of soluble organics Removal / Recovery of N,P
Toilet to
Tap
Increasing Complexity, Cost
5. • Loss of institutional knowledge
• Heavy reliance on on-the-job training
(OJT) rather than on formal training
and development
• Weak or non-existent Leadership
Development Programs
• Complications in bargaining agreements
• Issues of employee retention, such as
compensation and lack of advancement
Succession Planning
Succession Planning White Paper. NYWEA, 2012
Complexity, Cost, Career transitions
7. Real Plant Virtual Plant
Use of Simulators in wastewater treatment
• Predicting and Assessment of Water Quality
• Technology Evaluation (process, aeration, etc.)
• Limit of Technology
• Assessment of Compliance
8. Why Use Modeling?
• Cheaper than building/modifying the
real system
• Easier than carrying out testing on
existing systems
• Risk-free - see the consequences before
implementation
• Get results quickly
9. 0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Time (days)
WASTSSConcentration(mg/L)
Simulated Measured
How Is It Used?
Create
Model
Calibrate to
Known
Performance
Simulate
Different
Scenarios
Simulate “Base
Case”
Compare and
Evaluate
Models can be used to support training
10. • High fidelity – true to the actual process
• Replicate reality – start-up, shutdown, dynamic ops, etc.
• Support optimization and enhancement
Simulation Based Learning
Source: Vesel, 2013
12. Wastewater “Flight Simulator”
• Advanced operator training and education
• Identification and validation of plant optimization and cost saving strategies
• Project and risk analysis
• Key decision making support tool for all levels of management
• Engagement with stakeholders
13. Case 1: MSDGC
Goals for Simulator
• Support wet weather & nutrient
removal upgrades planning
• Operations planning –
shutdowns, schedule
maintenance
• Operations tool for plant staff
training
• “What – if” scenario operations
• Enable plant optimization
• Useable by MSD employees as
well as consultants
220,000 accounts, 850,000 residents
Flow: 1.5 to 130 MGD
14. Plant Overview
• 8.0 MGD
• NH3-N limits (1.5 mg/l)
• Effluent NH3 < 0.1 mg/l
• Effluent NO3 ~ 14 mg/l
• 8 DO Zones
MSDGC - Polk Run WWTP
VWEA Operations Conference 2015
Development of Process Models for Planning, Operations, and Training (Yi, et al.)
Goal: Optimize TN removal
and reduce energy
Initial
Total Air Req’d – 2.4M CF/day
Average Flowrate – 1680 CFM
Eff NH3 < 0.1 mg/l; TN ~ 14.2 mg/l
Total Air Req’d – 2.1M CF/day
Average Flowrate – 1500 CFM
Eff NH3 < 0.1 mg/l; TN ~ 10.3 mg/l
Final
Operator led optimization effort
Variables in model
• Tanks in and out of service
• Flow splits
• RAS/WAS rates
• Air flow – cfm vs. DO control
• Decanting / dewatering
operations
RAS
PE
ML
8 DO
Zones
15. Total Air Req’d – 2.4M CF/day
Average Flowrate – 1680 CFM
Eff NH3 < 0.1 mg/l; TN ~ 14.2 mg/l
Change DO in ABs
Initial Conditions Lower DO
Effluent NO3 = 14.2 mg/l Effluent NO3 = 10.3 mg/l
No Change in
Effluent NH3
VWEA Operations Conference 2015
Development of Process Models for Planning, Operations, and Training (Yi, et al.)
Goal: Optimize TN removal
and reduce energy
Total Air Req’d – 2.1M CF/day
Average Flowrate – 1500 CFM
Eff NH3 < 0.1 mg/l; TN ~ 10.3 mg/l
16. Case 2: Pima County Tres Rios WRF
• 3 metropolitan WRFs and 8 sub-regional facilities
• Extensive upgrades and retrofits over last ten years
• Calibrated GPS-X™ models and SimuWorks™ to support
design, upgrades, optimization, operations & training
17. Beyond SCADA……Probe-X™
• Integrate SCADA and laboratory measurements
• Develop process insights, ongoing operational assessment,
performance review, reporting & internal benchmarking of
performance across operational periods
18. Case 3: Ontario Clean Water Agency
• Operate 200 water &
wastewater facilities
• Largest operator of water and
wastewater facilities in
Ontario
• SimuWorks™ used for
internal operator training &
operator certification since
2012
“Hydromantis’ simulation technology is presenting our staff with an unparalleled operator training
environment and the implementation of real-time links between GPS-X™ and operator control systems
provide forward looking, actionable data for improved decision making support,” – OCWA President & CEO
Operators at the Belleville (Ontario) Water Control
Plant work on a troubleshooting scenario during a
Sewage Simulator Solutions course (TPO Magazine,
Virtual Reality, January 2014)
19. Case 4: WEF Operations Challenge
• Create a platform for WEF
Operations Challenge
• Develop realistic,
challenging scenarios
• Operator friendly, and easy
to use
• Tracks progress, enables
scoring
WEF Operations Challenge: Simulation as a Process Skill
…..simulators are primarily designed to help operators understand their plant and try new process strategies, they can also be
used as training tools. An operator can be given a set of initial conditions and shown how treatment processes react. Then the operator
can change process parameters, run a new simulation and see the results. This helps an operator understand how operating
parameters affect treatment process performance, which is the basis for operating skills and process control. If an operator is
presented with a preconfigured plant that is performing poorly, he or she can demonstrate their process skills by changing operating
conditions and running simulations repeatedly until the plant is performing as desired. This makes performing a plant simulation a
potential part of the Process Control event.
23. Conclusions
•Flight simulator concept can support training and
succession planning
•Simulator interface allows user to make changes to
plant operation, and see prediction of performance
•Robustly handles complexity
•Effective tool for planning, facility risk assessment,
emergency planning & response, optimization
•Visual tool to enhance stakeholder engagement