3. 1984
1997-1999
2002-2005
2007
2010-2011
2012
2013
RIM
Founded
2002-Voice Calling
2003-First Blackberry
with color screen
2005-4 million
subscribers
2010-Buys QNX
2011-Playbook
Launch, Service
Interruptions, Job
cuts
RIM name
changed to
Blackberry
John Chen
appointed CEO
1997-RIM goes public
1998- First Blackberry
1999- High Demand
for Blackberry. RIM
listed in NASDAQ
Most valuable
company in Canada
12 million subscribers
Co CEOs Step
down
BB10 launch
delayed
Layoffs continue
4. Industry
Telecommunications &
Wireless Devices
Differentiation Strategy
Product Features and
Performance
Low Data Usage (Data compression)
Security
Reliability
Prestige
Target Market
B2B Sales
Geography
HQ in Waterloo, Canada
Sales offices around the world
Research in
Motion
5. Strategy as a
Plan: RIM
Strategy as a
Process: Apple
Rational
Planning
Respond to
internal &
external forces
“Corporate
needs”
(INTENDED
STRATEGY)
BYOD &
Consumer
wants
(EMERGENT
STRATEGY)
INTENDED STRATEGY
FUELED BY FOCUS ON…
NOT REALIZED
REALIZED STRATEGY
6. “Mistakes and opposition are inevitable.
What is not inevitable is passivity, not
trying, not seeking to accomplish things
… What is not fine is paralysis or inaction,
which arise because we have little skill in
overcoming the opposition that inevitably
accompanies change, and little interest
in doing so …” (Pfeffer, 1992)
7. •Leader in smart phone hardware and
software.Vision/Mission
•Worldwide smartphone share=9.6%
Smartphone
Market Share
•ROIC: 28.11% ROA: 23.4% ROE: 28.3%ROIC, ROA, ROE
•Revenue grew 47% to over US$3.04 billion.Revenue
•Profit of US$631.6 millionProfit
8. Company ROA
(%)
ROE (%) ROI (%) EBITDA
(%)
Quick
Ratio
Current
Ratio
Total
Debt to
Equity
Blackberry 23.45 28.26 35.99 32.44 2.93 3.51 0
Apple Inc. 16.48 28.6 36.07 19.49 2.09 2.36 N/A
Nokia 23.93 53.89 56.37 16.11 1.23 1.54 0.09
Samsung 8.49 15.31 14.25 0 0.82 1.41 0.28
10. Innovation was desperately needed, but…
…the company simply wasn’t well-positioned to
respond to the threat.
Centralization &
Complexity
Creativity &
Innovation
11. Trust Networks
• Mike Lazaridis:
trusted by
engineers
within the
company
Advice
Networks
• No significant
issues evident
Communication
Networks
• Very
fragmented
• Lazaridis
learned of
iPhone release
while
exercising on
his treadmill
12. Rules
• Formal rules
aligned with
strategy
(managing wild
ducks)
Rewards
• Backdated stock
options rewarded
the wrong
behaviour – status
quo instead of
pushing forward
Culture
• “Don’t challenge
the big guys”…
career limiting
move
• Perpetuated
through hiring
practices
• Norms didn’t
support risk-taking
13. Sources of power: Possessed them?
Formal authority
Expertise
Centrality in information flow
Being liked
Reciprocity
Control over scarce resources
14. Risk-aversion
Co-CEO structure
› Domain-specific expertise led to
fragmentation in opinions and
communication
› Lead to slow (no?) recognition of changes in
the external environment, hindered
adaptation and response… slow
implementation
› Missed opportunities
15. Set direction
Design organization
(structure &
processes)
Instill a culture of
excellence and
ethical behaviour
Effective Strategic
Leadership?
Create a vision
Mobilize
commitment
Institutionalize
change
Transformational
Leadership?Situational
Leadership?
No evidence
16. Issues with the top management team
Cultural norms sabotaged innovation
Incentives rewarded the wrong
behaviour
NET RESULT: A lack of responsiveness when
it was most needed in the organization
17. Eliminate the Co-CEO structure
› Critical to achieving communication flow
Redefine target market
Refresh company vision/mission
Build new norms:
› Accountability
› Voicing of opinions
› Iterative feedback loops
› Customer-driven innovation (look externally as
well as internally)
› Support risk-taking
Alignment of incentives and controls
18. One CEO
Posted a profit the past quarter
Moved to divisional structure
Mass layoffs
Focus on enterprise customers
› Return to core competency
› New vision & strategy
› Moving away from “the middle”