1. 1
BANK INFORMATION SYSTEM DESIGN PROBLEM IN CENTRAL ELECTRONIC
EDUCATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT TRAINING, FINANCE TRAINING
BOARD, MINISTRY OF FINANCE
NovitaAjeng Primantari1
, NurAeniHidayah, MMSI2
, and SuciRatnawati, MTI3
1
Student of Information System Program, State Islamic University SyarifHidayatullah Jakarta
Tel: (021) 8855226 or 089654619697 , e - mail : nobitaajeng@gmail.com
2
Staf Lecturer Faculty of Science and Technology , State Islamic University SyarifHidayatullah Jakarta
Tel: (021) 7493606 Fax : (021) 7493315 , email : nungkie04@yahoo.com
3
Staf Lecturer Faculty of Science and Technology , State Islamic University SyarifHidayatullah Jakarta
Tel: (021) 7493606 Fax : (021) 7493315 , email : sratnaw69@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
HRD Training Center, the Ministry of Finance is a unit of echelon II organization in charge of implementing the
education and training of rank and position hierarchy. HRD Training Center has three (3) subfields, one of
which is the subfields Evaluation and Performance Reporting that have an important role in the management of
Item Bank. Problems in the management of Item Bank which runs today is all in the preparation process of
testing instruments ranging from the writing process to the determination of a matter still use conventional
methods to manual where the use of computers as a tool only and is not contained therein automation process.
Besides, the bank matter contained in the HRD Training Center only store the test materials were analyzed
qualitatively (theoretically). Based on the Item Bank development procedure, to obtain a good matter about the
qualitative analysis in addition to (theoretically) is also needed about the quantitative analysis (empirical) which
includes two measurement parameters, namely: the level of difficulty and distinguishing the grain problem, as
well as test quality analysis to test about the validity. To design a system wake of electronic information about
the bank is done by using the object-oriented development method with a model system development using Rapid
Application Development (RAD), for the design of systems using the Unified Modeling Language (UML).
Encoding system with ASP.NET platform using the C # programming language and the MVC architecture
(Model, View, Controller). While the database used is SQL Server 2008. The expected outcome of this system is
that it can help the process -writing, about qualitative analysis, test questions, about the quantitative analysis,
and determination of a matter that can be produced that have the characteristics of matter and can assist in the
effective management of Item Bank that meets the standard in Item Bank development.
Keywords: Electronic Test Bank Information Systems, Rapid Application Development ( RAD ), Unified
Modeling Language (UML)
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
Centre for Education and Training Human
Resource Development (HRD Training Center)
has a role in fostering the education, training,
and human resource development in the field
of rank hierarchy, and leadership
competencies, fostering the implementation of
tests of competence, as well as managing the
scholarship based on technical policy set by the
Head Finance Education and Training Agency.
HRD Training Center consists of three
subfields, one of which is the subfields
Evaluation and Performance Reporting
(Evalap) which has an important role, namely
managing the test material (matter) or also
called the management of Item Bank. During
which creates the problem in the Item Bank
management in HRD Training Center is just a
Item Bank used as a collection point service
exam in the form of a folder on the computer,
where the process of making the test material
(matter) until the determination of a matter
done conventionally or manually, giving rise to
some problems.
These issues among others, in the process
of writing about a matter in which the maker of
one another that have different formats of
writing about as a result of the lack of
standardization of the format used so that
management becomes more difficult matter.
A matter that has accumulated in the Item
Bank then scrutinized (review) by a team of
reviewers to discuss how to examine the test
items based on item-writing rules. About the
review process is time consuming especially
when the discussion to produce a good
question. Questions have subsequently been
examined by KasubbidEvalap to be issued in
the tests. The process of fixing this problem is
to use a standard estimate because there has
been no standard for selecting items were
eligible to be issued in the tests.
According Sumardyono&Wiworo (2011),
Item Bank is a set of items was calibrated

2. 2
(tested) both theoretically and empirically, and
contains important information that can be
easily used in the preparation of an assessment
instrument (test). Based on these definitions, it
is necessary to test the qualitative problem
(theoretically) and quantitative (empirical)
issued prior to the exam questions in order to
produce a valid assessment instrument
(saheeh).
Based on the research and interviews
conducted by the Head of the subfields Evalap
HRD Training Center, a matter which is put
into Item Bank is only performed at the stage
of qualitative analysis. These issues have not
been made quantitative analysis that is not
known about the quality in terms of validity of
the items (items was) and characteristics of the
items were in the form and level of difficulty
distinguishing the grain problem .
1.2 Problem Formulation
Based on observations on systems that run
on HRD Training Center, then the problem can
be identified as follows:
1. In the process of writing about , between
makers about the one with the other has a
different format of writing about as a result
there has been no standardized format is
used so that the management about the
problem more difficult.
2. Author submit questions directly about the
matter hardcopy, so form must be typed
again by officers about the recipient and
allows the leakage problem.
3. About the review process was done by
using a moderator (discuss) that take a long
time
4. About the standard setting process using
approximate because there has been no
standard for selecting items were eligible to
be issued in the tests.
5. Problem is put into question bank is only
performed at the stage of qualitative
analysis. The matter has not been made
quantitative analyzes that do not yet have
good characteristics items were empirically.
From the identification of the issues
mentioned above, the problem can be
formulated as follows:
1. How to analyze and design the Test Bank
Information Systems Elektronikdi HRD
Training CenterFinancial Training Agency
The Ministry of Finance ?
2. How to make Test Bank Information
Systems Elektronikdi HRD Training
CenterFinancial Training Agency, the
Ministry of Finance in accordance with the
procedure question bank development ?
1.3 Limitation
In order for this research is more focused
and directed, the research conducted by the
extent of the problem as follows:
1. Research conducted only in HRD
Training Center, Financial Training
Agency, Ministry of Finance and
Reporting on Performance Evaluation
subfields.
2. Just save the questions for the test and
the type of service used is a matter of
multiple choice questions.
3. Analysis of the quality of the validity of
the test using the test questions, while
analysis of grain about quantitative
measurement includes two parameter,
namely: the level of difficulty and
distinguishing the grain problem.
4. Electronic information system question
bank is used by the admin, maker matter,,
reviewer, testee, and Kasubbid
Performance Evaluation and Reporting (
KasubbidEvalap ).
5. Method development is a model system
used Rapid Application Development
(RAD) with the system design using the
Unified Modeling Language (UM) ,
which is used in the development and
tools using ASP.NET systems with
programming languages C # and MVC
architecture (Model , View , Controller) .
While the database use SQL Server 2008
and IIS 7 as a web server.
6. This study was only done to
implementation.
2. THEORITICAL BASIS
2.1 Definition of Information System
Ladjamuddin (2005) defines that the
information system is a set of organizational
procedures when implemented will provide
information for decision makers and to control or
organization.
2.2 Definition of Item Bank
Item Bank has the sense of a large
collection of test items that measure a field
instruction (teaching) specific (Kartowagiran,
quoted in Sandman, 2004). According to Wright
and Bell in Puspendik (2009), Item Bank
development goal is to assess the quality of the
question itself can be determined from the test
items in it if it meets certain criteria that will be
used in the assembly of an assay.
2.3 Analysis of Test Quality
Analysis of the quality of the test is a step
that is taken to determine the degree of quality
of a test, either as a whole or the grain problem

3. 3
that become part of the test (Arifin, 2011).
Analysis of test quality with regard to the
question of whether the test as a measuring
instrument actually measures what should be
measured. The question refers to the subject
matter, namely validity.
2.3.1 Validation or validity of the Items
The validity of the assessment tool to the
provisions of the draft which was considered so
really assess what it should be assessed. If one
wants to know which test items that cause the
problem as a whole is bad because it has a low
validity, then it can be searched with a validity
problem.
For questions form an objective score for an
item commonly given to 1 (for items answered
correctly) and 0 (items answered incorrectly).
One way to determine the validity of the
measuring instrument is to use a product
moment correlation proposed by Pearson as
follows (Arikunto, 2012):
Where:
rxy = correlation coefficient
n = number of subjects
X = score of the items was
Y = total score
Here's a table of correlation coefficients scale
validity index (Depdiknas, 2010).
Table 1.Correlation Coefficient Validity
Index
Source: Depdiknas, 2010
2.4 Item Analysis
Analysis of the grain problem or item
analysis is the assessment test questions in order
to obtain the questions that have adequate
quality (Sudjana, 2010). Item analysis was
conducted to determine whether or not a matter
of function (Surapranata, 2009). The analysis is
generally done in two ways, namely qualitative
analysis (qualitative control) and quantitative
analysis (quantitative control) (Surapranata,
2009).
2.4.1 Qualitative Analysis of Grain Problem
Qualitative analysis is often also referred to
as logical validity (logical validity) is a study
intended to analyze the problem in terms of
technical, content, and editorial (Surapranata,
2009). Testing this theoretical question is
technically called the review questions or
study questions (item review).
In the matter of grain analyzed
qualitatively, about the use of the review
format will greatly assist and facilitate
implementation procedures. About the study
format is used as a basis for analyzing the
grain problem. Here's a review of the format
of multiple choice questions (Depdiknas,
2010).
Table 2.Aspects of Assessing Multiple Choice
Questions
No. Aspect Examined
A.
1
Materials
Matter in accordance with the indicators
2. Homogeneous and logical choice answers
3. There is only one answer key
B.
4.
Construction
The subject matter defined by concise, clear, and
unequivocal
5. The formulation of the subject matter and choice
the answer is a statementrequired course
6. Subject matter does not guide
answer key
7. The subject matter of the free and the statement
is a double negative
9. Images, graphs, tables, diagrams, orlike clear and
functioning
10. Do not use the answer choicesstatement " all of the
above wrong / right "and the like
11. Choice answers in the form of number /
timearranged in order of largesmall numbers or
chronological
12. Those items do not depend on the answer
about previous
C Language / Culture
13. Using appropriate languagewith the rules of
Indonesian.
14. Using communicative language
15.
16.
Not use the language of the applicable Local/
taboo
Not repeat the answer choices word/ the same
group of words , except is an integral
understandin
Source: Depdiknas, 2010
Processing qualitative data obtained from
the study of items with the format of the study
items were then measured by a Guttman scale.
The data analysis results by means of (Purwanto,
2002):
K =
𝐹
𝑁 𝑥 𝐼 𝑥 𝑅
𝑥100%
Description:
K = Percentage eligibility criteria
F = Total overall score
N = the highest scores in the study
I = number of aspects are assessed
R = Number of Reviewers
From the analysis of the percentage of the
study eligibility criteria sheet will be compared
with the interpretation of the following criteria:
Table 3.Interpretation Criteria
Source: Riduwan, 2010
Validity Index Specification
0,8 – 1,0 Very High
0,6 –0,8 High
0,4 –0,6 Enough
0,2 – 0,4 Low
0–0,2 Very Low
Percentage Remarks
0–20 Very Not Worthy
21–40 Improper
41–60 Self-Worth
61– 80 Worthy
81–100 Very Worthy

4. 4
2.4.2 Item-Analysis of Quantitative
Quantitative analysis about the emphasis on
the analysis of the internal characteristics of
the test data obtained through empirical
(Surapranata, 2009).Internal characteristics
include parameters quantitatively intended
difficulty level and distinguishing the grain
problem.
2.4.2.1Level of Difficulty
The level of difficulty is about the
opportunity to answer a question correctly in
a certain level of ability commonly expressed
by the index (Arifin , 2011) . Here is a
formula to find P. (Arikunto, 2012).
JS
B
P 
Dimana :
P = Index of difficulty
B = Number of test takers who answered the
question correctly
JS = Total number of test takers
Here's a table of classification difficulty
index (Depdiknas, 2010).
Table 4.Difficulty Index
Difficulty Index Description
0,00 – 0,30 Difficult Problem
Category
0,31 – 0,70 Moderate Problem
Category
0,71 – 1,00 Easy Problem Category
Source: Depdiknas, 2010
2.4.2.2Discriminating Power
Differentiator is how much power the
ability to distinguish between items was
testee who know the answers correctly and
with the testeecan not answer that question
(or answer to any testee) (Suherman , 2003) .
To calculate the distinguishing each item on
the following formula can be used (Arikunto,
2012):
BA
B
B
A
A
PP
J
B
J
B
DP 
Where:
J = Number of test takers
JA = Number of participants over the group
JB =Number of participants under the
group
BA = Number of participants who answered
the group over the matter correctly.
BB = Number of participants under the
group who answered the question correctly
PA = Proportion of participants who
answered correctly the top group
PB = Theproportion of participants who
answered correctly under the group
Here's a table distinguishing
classification (Arifin, 2011):
Table 5.Classification of Discriminating
Power
Discriminating Power Description
0,00 – 0,20 Poor
0,21 – 0,40 Satisfactory
0,41 - ,70 Good
0,71 – 1,00 Excelllent
Source: Arifin, 2011
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research Framework
In conducting the study, the authors
conducted stages of activities to follow the action
plan set out in the following frameworks:
Mulai
Metode Observasi
Metode Wawancara
Studi Pustaka
Definisi Lingkup
Analisis Sistem
Perancangan
Sistem
Implementasi
Sistem
Analisis Masalah
Analisis Persyaratan
Functional
Requirements
Nonfunctional
Requirements
Analisis Keputusan
Alur Sistem
Rancangan Sistem
Basis Data
Rancangan
Antarmuka
Pemrograman
Pengujian Black
Box
Rich Picture
Problems,
Opportunities,
Objectives, and
Constraits Matrix
Use Case
Diiagram
Activity Diagram
Class Diagram
Sequence
Diagram
Normalisasi
Visio
ASP.NET MVC
dengan Bahasa
Pemrograman C#
SQL Server 2008
Selesai
Metode Pengembangan
Sistem
RDBMS
Studi Literatur
Metode
Pengumpulan Data
Kesimpulan dan
Saran
Rapid Application
Development
(Whitten, 2004)
Figure 1. Research Framework
4. DISCUSSION
4.1 Definition of Scope
To further focus of this study, the authors
limit the scope of the problem and research on
HRD Training Centre, Ministry of Finance ,
Performance Evaluation and Reporting
subfields . In the management of question bank
which runs today still have obstacles ranging
from writing about the matter until the
determination. As at the time of writing there is
a problem where the system can not
accommodate the writing process so that the
matter in accordance with the manufacturer's
standard questions with each other have
different formats of writing about. Similarly
when reviewing a matter that requires a
relatively long time because each item on each
one to be discussed together to produce a
decent question, and the determination of the
feasibility of a matter which is still based on
estimates and not on procedures in accordance
with the applicable rules.

5. 5
The application is within the scope of an intranet
system because the system can only be accessed is
limited to the internal network at the Training Center
of the Ministry of Finance. Electronic information
system question bank goes online as a matter of trial
process also involves testee of various Training
Center. For that all activities are conducted online
and distributed data directly. The design of the
system helps the processing and storage of data at
start -writing process review questions (qualitative
item analysis), test questions, a quantitative analysis
about the matter until the determination.
4.2 System Analysis
4.2.1 Problem Analysis
After the collection of data through
observation, interviews regarding the
management of the system test material (matter)
running on HRD Training Center, Financial
Training Agency, Ministry of Finance, which
runs the system still uses the conventional
system which is manual and not following the
procedures in the development of a Item Bank.
The system starts when the lecturers as the
makers write exam questions using Microsoft
Excel. The format of writing about the maker
about one another that sometimes different due
to the lack of standardization of the format used
so that the management of the matter in Item
Bank becomes more difficult.
A matter that has accumulated in the Item
Bank then scrutinized (review) by a team of
reviewers. About the review process or about
the qualitative analysis carried out in HRD
Training Center was done by using a moderator,
where there is one person as arbitrator. Each
itemswere discussed together with some
reviewers. This process is done in several stage,
so a lot of the time required in the process of
review questions.
When the exam will be held, the clerk will
hand over the receiver about a matter that has
been studied to KasubbidEvalap determination
to do about. The process of setting this matter
based on the results of a review of a matter that
has been done before. The questions that have
been reviewed (study) is qualitatively good , but
not necessarily in the field is also good .
Therefore, there needs to be a matter of
empirical testing.
Analysis of the system are visualized in the
following picture rich modeling.
Sub Bidang Evaluasi dan Pelaporan Kinerja
Petugas Penerima Soal
Tim Reviewer
Petugas Penggandaan Soal Petugas Pengetik Soal
Kepala Pusdiklat
7. Menyerahkan soal untuk direview
14. Menyerahkan soal untuk
diketik dan dicetak
18. Menyerahkan master soal untuk
dilakukan penggandaan
5. Simpan soal ke dalam Bank soal
Pembuat Soal
6. Ambil soal untuk direview
BANK SOAL
9. Menyerahkan soal yang telah direview
10. Simpan soal yang telah direview
11. Ambil soal untuk
dilakukan penetapan soal
12. Menyerahkan soal untuk dilakukan
penetapan soal
Kasubbid Evalap
4. Penulisan soal
menggunakan Microsoft
Excel
8. Melakukan Review Soal
13. Penetapan
kelayakan soal
ujian15. Pengetikan dan Pencetakan
master soal
16. Menyerahkan master soal
1. Menugaskan pelaksana
untuk menyusun konsep
surat permintaan naskah
ujian
Pelaksana
2. Menyusun konsep
surat permintaan naskah
ujian
Surat
permintaan
pembuatan
naskah ujian
Naskah Soal
Ujian
Naskah soal
ujian
Naskah soal yang
telah direview
17. Simpan Master Soal
Naskah soal yang
telah direview
Master Soal
Kasubbid Evalap
3. Pengecekan surat
Pengembalian surat
Figure 2.Rich PictureSystems Analysis Walk
Based on the problems above artifacts
on a running can cover the needs of the
manufacturing process until the matter of
fixing the problems. Figure following a
procedure which is a question bank electronic
systems that will be developed at HRD
Training Center.system, it is necessary that the
proposed system
Pembuat Soal
Simpan Data
Reviewer
Kasubbid Evaluasi dan
Pelaporan Kinerja
(Kasubbid Evalap)
Admin
Manajemen Data (Manj. Jabatan, Manj.
Pusdiklat, Manj. Tipe Soal, Manj. Materi,
Manj. Soal, Manj. Data Kisi-Kisi, Manj.
Jadwal)
Login dan Logout
Testee
Ubah Password
Login dan Logout
Login dan LogoutLogin dan Logout
Sistem Informasi Bank Soal
Elektronik
Membuat Soal (Unduh Kisi,
Manajemen Soal), Melihat Notifikasi
Jadwal
Pengaturan Uji Coba Soal dan Analisis
Kuantitatif Soal (Melihat Pedoman
Analisis Kuantitatif soal, analisa soal,
penetapan soal, dan download master
soal), Melihat Notifikasi Jadwal
Manajemen User ( Pengaturan Akun,
Pengaturan Peranan)
Server
Analisis Kualitatif Soal (Melihat Pedoman
Analisis Kualitatif Soal, Review Soal), Melihat
Notifikasi Jadwal
Ubah Password
Ubah Password
Uji Coba Soal
Ubah Password
Ubah Password
Login dan Logout
Figure 3.Rich Picture Analysis System Proposal

6. 6
4.1 System Design
4.2.1 Flow of System
4.2.1.1 Use Case Diagram
Figure 3.Use Case Diagram of the Proposed
System InItem Bank Electronic Information
Systems
4.2.1.2 Activity Diagram
1. Activity Diagram of Use Case Review Problem
Figure 5.Activity Diagram of Use Case Review
Problem
2. Activity Diagram of Use Case Trial Conduct
Problem
Figure 6.Activity Diagram of Use Case Trial
Conduct Problem
4.2.1.3 Class Diagram
Figure 7.Class Diagram Electronic Test Bank
Information Systems

7. 7
4.2.1.4 Sequence Diagram
1. Sequence Diagram Review Sub Menu Problem
Figure 8.Sequence Diagram Review Sub Menu
Problem
2. Sequence Diagram Analysis Sub Menu Problem
Figure 9. Sequence Sequence Diagram Analysis Sub
Menu Problem
4.2.1.5 Relational Database Managemen
System(RDBMS)
UserProfile
PK NoPegawai
FK1 KodeJabatan
FK2 KodeMatpel
Username
NamaLengkap
TglLahir
FK3 KodePusdiklat
Email
StatusAkun
Privelege
Jabatan
PK KodeJabatan
NamaJabatan
MataPelajaran
PK KodeMatpel
NamaMatpel
Deskripsi
Materi
PK KodeMateri
FK1 KodeMatpel
NamaMateri
KegBelajar
KisiSoal
PK KodeKisi
FK1 KodeMatpel
NamaFile
Deskripsi
[Document]
TipeFile
Soal
PK KodeSoal
FK1 KodeMatpel
FK2 KodeTipe
NamaSoal
StatusReview
StatusAnalisis
ButirSoal
PK SeqNo
NoButir
FK1 KodeSoal
FK2 KodeMateri
IsiSoal
PilA
PilB
PilC
PilD
Kunci
BobotSoal
StatusReview
TglReview
StatPenetapan
TglPenetapan
KelompokAtas
KelompokBawah
Validitas
TingkatKesukaran
DayaPembeda
Review
SkorReview
Ujicoba
PK KodeUjicoba
FK1 KodeSoal
TglUjicoba
Lama
WaktuPelaksanaan
StatusUjicoba
StatusPenetapan
TesteeDetail
PK TesteeID
FK1 NoPegawai
FK2 KodeUjiCoba
Jawaban
Skor
SkorDetails
StatusUjian
TipeSoal
PK KodeTipe
TipeSoalDesc
Pusdiklat
PK KodePusdiklat
NamaPusdiklat
CreatedBy
CreatedDate
LastUpdatedBy
LastUpdatedDate
Jadwal
PK KodeJadwal
NamaJadwal
Tahun
AuditLog
PK AuditId
CreatedBy
CreatedDate
LastUpdatedBy
LastUpdatedDate
TabelModified
FK1 NoPegawai
JadwalUser
PK KodeJadwalUser
FK1 KodeJadwal
FK2 NoPegawai
Tanggal
Kegiatan
Figure 10.Relation Database Design Question
Bank
4.4.1 Interface Design
At this stage, the design view (interface) web
pages . The design of the interface is expected to
allow the admin, maker of matter, reviewer,
testee, and KasubbidEvalap in running electronic
information system question bank. Here is Figure
an interface design question bank electronic
information systems,
1) Home Page KasubbidEvalap
This page is the initial view when entering
the main page (Home) to KasubbidEvalap
on Question Bank Electronic Information
Systems. .

8. 8
Selamat Datang, Kasubbid EvalapHome Pengaturan Uji Coba Soal Analisis Kuantitatif SoalSIBSE PPSDM
LOGO Sistem Informasi Bank Soal Elektronik
Pusdiklat PSDM, Kementerian Keuangan
Selamat Datang
Silahkan Pilih Menu yang Akan Dikerjakan Pada Sistem Informasi Bank Soal Elektronik
FOOTER
Setting Profil
Figure 14. Draft Home Page
KasubbidEvalap
2) Item Review Form Page Problem
Items about the review process uses aspects
of the study of the form table, multiple-
choice items were done with menchecklist
point on the form. Point checklist will be
calculated using a Guttman scale. The
results will be displayed in the form of a
review and the review scores.
Selamat Datang Reviewer
Nomor Soal : 1
Kembali
Checklist No. Aspek yang Ditelaah
1.
A. Materi
LOGO Sistem Informasi Bank Soal Elektronik
Pusdiklat PSDM, Kementerian Keuangan
Review Butir Soal
Home Analisa Kualitatif SoalSIBSE PPSDM
Materi Butir Soal
Soal :
Kunci Jawaban
A.
B.
C.
D.
Check Un-Check All
Prev Next
Soal Sesuai Indikator
Pilihan Jawaban Homogen dan Logis2,
B. Konstruksi
A. Pokok Soal Dirumuskan dengan Singkat
Setting Profil
Figure 12.Draft Review Item-Page Form
3) Problem Analysis Page
KasubbidEvalap who want to do an analysis
about sub- menu to select the analysis
questions that are on the menu about the
quantitative analysis. The trial results were
analyzed quantitatively covering about
validity, level of difficulty, and
distinguishing the grain problem.
Pilih Kode Uji Coba
Lihat Analisa Soal Berdasarkan Uji Coba Soal
Lihat Analisa
Nama Peserta
Nama Peserta 1
Nama Peserta 2
No. 1
1
1
No. 2
1
0
No. 3
1
No. 4
1
1
No. 5
1
No. 6
0
1
No. 7
0
No. 8
1
0
No. 9
0
0
No. 10
1
0
No. 11
0
1
No. 12
1
0
No. 13
0
1
No. 14
1
0
No. 15
0
1
No. 16
1
0
Skor Total
13
12
Nama Peserta 3
Nama Peserta 14
0
1
0
0
1
1
0 1
0 1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
11
10
s
q 0
0 0
0
0 0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
2
Total Kelompok Atas
Total Kelompok Bawah
0.55
11
Jelek
11
0
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11 11
11
Nilai Validitas
Validitas Soal
0
Sangat
Rendah
0
Sangat
Rendah
0
Sangat
Rendah
11
Sangat
Rendah
0
Sangat
Rendah
0
Sangat
Rendah
Sangat
Rendah
0
Sangat
Rendah
0
Sangat
Rendah
0
Sangat
Rendah
0
Sangat
Rendah
0
Sangat
Rendah
0
Sangat
Rendah
0
Sangat
Rendah
0
Sangat
Rendah
0
Sangat
Rendah
0
Selamat Datang Kasubbid EvalapHome Pengaturan Uji Coba Soal Analisa Kuantitatif SoalSIBSE PPSDM
0
11
0 0
0 11 11
0
LOGO Sistem Informasi Bank Soal Elektronik
Pusdiklat PSDM, Kementerian Keuangan
Daya Pembeda
Kategori Daya Pembeda Jelek
0 0
Jelek
0 0 0
Jelek
0
Jelek
0
Jelek
0
Jelek
0 0
Jelek
0
Jelek
0
Jelek
0
Jelek
0
Jelek
0
Jelek
14
2
Kat. Daya Pembeda
Tingkat Kesukaran
0.4
Mudah
0.3
Cukup
0.7
Cukup
0.5
Cukup
0.4
Baik
0.2
Cukup
0.3
Cukup
0.4
Cukup
0.5
Baik
0.2
Cukup Baik
0.5 0.6
Baik
Kategori Kesukaran
Keputusan
Sukar
Dtolak
Mudah
Ditolak
Mudah
Dtolak
0.5
Dtolak
Mudah
Dtolak
Mudah
Dtolak Dtolak
Mudah
Dtolak
Mudah
Dtolak
Mudah
Dtolak
Mudah
Dtolak
Mudah
Dtolak
Mudah
Dtolak
Mudah
Dtolak
Mudah
Dtolak
Mudah
Dtolak
12
1
Jelek Jelek
Baik Cukup Baik
Mudah
0
0 0
0
Jelek Jelek
Setting Profil
Figure 16. Draft Page Analysis Problem
4.4.2 TampilanAplikasi
1. Home PageKasubbidEvalap
Figure 14. Home PageKasubbidEvalap
2. Item Review Form Page Problem
Figure 15. Item Review Form Page Problem
3. Problem Analysis Page
Figure 16.Problem Analysis Page
5. CLOSING
1. Conclusion
Based on the results of the discussion, it
generates some conclusions as follows:
1. The system developed based question
bank development procedures that
include a qualitative analysis about
which includes review (review ) about
based on the lattice and exam -writing, as
well as quantitative analysis of matter
that serves as a test instrument using the
formula about the validity, power
differentiator, and level of difficulty.
2. Electronic question bank system is a web
-based system developed using
ASP.NET platform with the C #
programming language and the MVC

9. 9
architecture (Model, View, Controller )
and SQL Server 2008 database that
serves as a tool question bank and test
instruments for the questions that are
owned so as to assist in the management
tasks for the exam questions.
3. The system is expected to be on target
applications and in accordance with the
requirements for internal analysis was
adjusted HRD Training Center.
2. Suggestion
Based on the research and analysis that has
been done, there are suggestions that can be
taken, including:
1. Developed systems still have limitations in
accommodating the types of problems
other than multiple choice. It would be
better if this system is developed further so
as to accommodate other types of
problems such as essays, right from
wrong, and about the match.
2. Systems developed an electronic question
bank used to load only a matter for the
official exam. It would be better if the
system is also used to load the exam
questions for the other.
3. The system developed has not been able to
provide an option for KasubbidEvalap if
you want to use another instrument test
formula. It would be better if the system is
able to provide a choice in selecting the
formula to be used.
4. The system developed has yet to find a
feature about the reliability and power
Spieler grain problem. The system should
be equipped with a calculation to find
reliability and power humbug about the
matter so that the characteristics of a more
complete and decisions for problem
determination can be done better.
5. For further research to develop this system
by adding a statistical report on the matter
that has not been or have been reviewed
(review ), or a matter that has not been
tested and established as a matter about
which to test or about the dropped /
discarded.
6. The system developed can be developed
using other programming languages ,
programming languages either web or
desktop -based.
REFERENCE
Amburawu,
2010.AplikasiPanduanMengerjakanSoalUntukUj
ianNasional SMP Berbasis
Web.JurnalTeknikInformatikaUniversitasMercub
uana.
Anonim.tanpatahun.BBM
Suplemen/AnalisisButirSoaldanBank Soal.
https://www.google.co.id/#psj=1&q=BBM+suple
men+%2F+analisis+butir+soal+dan+bank+soaldi
unduhpada 27 Agustus 2013.
Antonius,N.2010. CodeIgniter: Cara
MudahMembangunAplikasi PHP. Jakarta:
Mediakita.
Arifin, Zainal.2011.Evaluasi PembelajaranPrinsip,
Teknik, Prosedur.
Bandung:PTRemajaRosdakarya.
Arikunto, Suharsimi.2012.Dasar-Dasar
EvaluasiPendidikanEdisi 2. Jakarta: PT
BumiAksara.
Badrun Kartowagiran.2011. PenulisanButirSoal.
MakalahdisampaikanpadaPelatihanAssesmenPe
mbelajaranbagiDosenMuda UPI, di Pascasarjana
UNY, Yogyakarta padatanggal 3-7 Oktober
2011.
BPPK. 2013. BahanAjarDiklatPenyusunanSoal
(BPPK). Jakarta:
PusdiklatKeuanganUmumKementerianKeuangan
.
Eko, N dan Sri S.
2011.PengembanganPirantiPenyusunSoalUjianB
erbasis WEB Untuk Mata
PelajaranSekolahMenegahPertama.JurnalPenelit
ian IPTEK-KOM.
Endang, P danMasduki. 2010.
AsesmenPembelajaran SD.Jakarta:
DirektoratJenderalPendidikanTinggi –
Depdiknas.
Faisal.2013 (terjemahan Tom Dykstra).Implementasi
Entity Framework Pada ASP.NET
MVC.http://www.asp.net/mvc/tutorials/getting-
started-with-ef-using-mvc) diunduhpada 16 Juli
2013.
Hariyanto, Bambang.
2004.RekayasaBerorientasiObyek. Bandung:
Informatika.
Jay, Ronald C. and Swerdlik, Mark E.
2010.Psychological Testing and Assestment,
Seventh Edition. New York: The McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc.
Jogiyanto. 2008.
MetodologiPenelitianSistemInformasi.
Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI.
Kadir, Abdul. 2009.
DasarPerancangandanImplementasi Database
Relasional. Yogyakarta: PenerbitAndi.
Kartowagiran, dkk. 2010. Identifikasi Need
Assesment: StudiAwalModelPengembangan
Bank SoalBerbasis Guru di Provinsi DIY. Jurnal

10. 10
of PascasarjanaUniversitasNegeri
Yogyakarta.Vol 40, pp.45-58.
Kusumo, Ario. S. 2007. ASP.NET 2.0 dengan VB
2005. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.
Ladjamudin AL. 2005.
AnalisadanDesainSistemInformasi.Edisi 1.
Yogyakarta: GrahaIlmu.
Lilis. 2011. AnalisisButirSoalUlanganAkhir
Semester Gasal IPA Kelas IX SMP di
KabupatenGrobogan. SkripsiJurusanBiologi
FMIPA UniversitasNegeri Semarang.
Katz, J. E., dan Aspden, P. (1997). A nation of
strangers. Communications of the ACM, 40(12),
81-86.
Martin, Joe. danTomson, Brett. BelajarSendiri
ASP.NET. Yogyakarta: PenerbitAndi.
Munadi, Sudji, (tanpatahun)
AnalisisValidasiSoalTesHasilBelajarPadaPelak
sanaan Program Pembelajaran di
FakultasTeknikUniversitasNegeri
Yogyakarta.Jurnal FT UniversitasNegeri
Yogyakarta.
Munawar.2005. Pemodelan Visual Dengan UML.
Yogyakarta: PenerbitGrahaIlmu.
PrabowodanHerlawati. 2011. Menggunakan UML.
Bandung: PenerbitInformatika Bandung.
Pressman RS. 2002. RekayasaPerangkatLunak.
Yogyakarta: PenerbitAndi.
Priyatno, Duwi. 2010. PahamAnalisaStatistik Data
denganSPSS. Jakarta: PT. BukuSeru.
ProsidingPertemuanIlmiah XXIV HFI Jateng& DIY.
Muntoha, Mohammad.2010.Pengembangan
SistemEvaluasiPembelajaranBerbasis Web
(Web Based Larning Assessment
System).Semarang, Jawa Tengah. pp 195- 199.
Retnawati, Heri, (tanpatahun) Pengembangan Bank
SoalMatematika. Yogyakarta. JurnalMatematika
FMIPA UNY Yogyakarta.
Riduwan. 2012. SkalaPengukuranVariabel-
VariabelPenelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Rizky, Soetam. 2009. Learning By Sample ASP.NET
3.5. Jakarta : PT PrestasiPustakaKarya.
Sambas Ali MuhidindanMaman Abdurrahman,
2007.AnalisisKorelasi, Regresi,
danJalurdalamPenelitian. Bandung: CV
PustakaSetia.
Sholiq.2006.Pemodelan
SistemInformasiBerorientasiObyekdenganUML.
Yogyakarta: GrahaIlmu.
Sudjana, Nana.2010.Penilaian Hasil Proses
BelajarMengajar.Bandung: PT
RemajaRosdakarya.
Suhanto, Agus. 2008. Mengenal ASP.NET MVC
Edisi Beta. Jakarta: Indonesia .NET Developer
Community.
Sugiyono, 2004.MetodePenelitianAdministrasi.
Jakarta: CV. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. 2010. MetodePenelitianKuantitatif,
Kualitatifdan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukardi.2009.Evaluasi
PendidikanPrinsipdanOperasionalnya.
Jakarta:PTBumiAksara.
SumardyonodanWiworo. 2011.
PengembangandanPengelolaan Bank
SoalMatematika di KKG/MGMP. Jakarta:
BadanPengembanganSumberDayaManusiaPend
idikandanPenjaminanMutuPendidikan –
KementerianPendidikan.
Sungkowo.2010. PanduanBahanUjiBerbasis TIK
PSB-SMA. Jakarta:DirektoratPembinaan SMA.
Supranata,
Sumarna.2009.Analisis,Validitas,Reliabilitas,
danInterpretasiHasilTesImplementasiKurikulum
2004. Bandung: PT RemajaRosdakarya.
Suryabrata, Sumadi. 1997.Pengembangan
TesHasilBelajar. Jakarta: PT Raja
GrafindoPersada.
WahanaKomputer, 2008. BelajarPemrograman C#.
Yogyakarta: PenerbitAndi.
Wahana Komputer.2010.Short course SQL Server
2008 Express.Semarang: C.V Andi Offset.
Whitehorn, Mark and Marklyn, Bill. 2003. Inside
Relational Database. Jakarta: PenerbitErlangga.
Whitten JL, Bentley LD, Dittman KC. 2004.Metode
DesaindanAnalisisSistemedisi 6. Penerjemah:
Tim Penerjemah ANDI, editor. Yogyakarta:
Penerbit ANDI. Terjemahandari: System
Analysis and Design Methods.
Widodo, Sri Wasono. 2012. "RancangBangun
Media DiklatInteraktifTipe Hypertext Tool
untukSimulasiAnalisisButirSoaldalamDiklat
Guru Pemandu LPMP Jawa
Tengah". LaporanPenelitianPengembangan,
diajukandalamrangkakegiatanpengembanganpro
fesiWidyaiswara.