Achieving the Passive House criteria on a high-rise, concrete-framed building located in Vancouver, BC.
Presented at the 2017 NAPHN Conference and Expo by Eric Catania, M.Eng., BEMP, CPHD, LEED AP BD+C, PHI Accredited Passive House Certifier.
1. 1
High-Rise Passive House Feasibility
Study
ACHIEVING THE PASSIVE HOUSE CRITERIA ON A HIGH-RISE, CONCRETE
FRAMED BUILDING, LOCATED IN VANCOUVER
ERIC CATANIA, M.ENG., BEMP, CPHD, LEED AP BD+C,
PHI ACCREDITED PASSIVE HOUSE CERTIFIER
OCTOBER 7TH, 2016 – NAPHN CONFERENCE & EXPO 2017
SESSION: PASSIVE STANDS TALL: HIGH RISES IN NORTH AMERICA & EUROPE
2. 2
RDH Building Science
Façade Engineering
Enclosure Consulting
Energy Services
Research & Forensics
RDH Labs in Waterloo, Ontario
Passive House Consulting
Multi-unit developments
Tall wood buildings
PHI Building Certifiers
Large-building expertise
Offices in U.S. & Canada
200+ staff in nine cities
Boston, Oakland, Seattle
4. 4
High Rise Passive Houses
Surface Area Ratio
Enclosure performance targets
Internal heat gain
Overheating potential
PER and PE are key challenges
Maximize natural ventilation
High efficiency heating/cooling
Plug loads and Lighting
5. 5
The Building
10 Storeys
4,060 m² (43,668 ft²)
Gross Floor Area (GFA)
3,400 m² (36,606 ft²)
Treated Floor Area (TFA)
Residential occupancy
90 small suites
250 ft² to 370 ft²
Infill lot
Non-Combustible
Is Passive House feasible?
dys architecture
6. 6
Key Concerns
Narrow, infill lot
Compact design
Limited wall thickness
› ~14” (356 mm)
Non-Combustible
Construction
Steel and Concrete
› Large thermal bridges
Window Materials
Google Maps
16. 16
Window Materials
BC Building Code 2012 – Division B – Part 3 — Fire Protection,
Occupant Safety and Accessibility - 3.1.5.4. (5)
each window in an exterior wall face is an individual unit
separated by non-combustible wall construction from every other
opening in the wall,
windows in exterior walls in contiguous storeys are separated by
not less than 1 m of non-combustible construction, and
the aggregate area of openings in an exterior wall face of a fire
compartment is not more than 40% of the area of the wall face.
30. 30
Distribution of Energy Use
Passive House MURB
60% reduction in
Lighting and
Plug loads vs.
ASHRAE 90.1-2010
31. 31
Overheating in small suites
Peak heat load: 10 W/m² x (Area m²) ~ 235 W
Internal Gains: 5 W/m² (Plug Loads) +
5 W/m² (Lighting) + Occupants + Other?
dys architecture
32. 32
14.2
11.4
4
131
60
15
10
10
120
60
0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150
Heating Demand
Heating Load
Frequency of Overheating
Primary Energy
Primary Energy Renewable
kWh/ m2
Proposed Building Threshold
Preliminary Results
33. 33
Conclusions
Heating demand criteria can be achieved
Heating load is exceeded
Although overheating frequency is 4%, small suites on the
south side may be a concern
Maximize natural ventilation
Cooling may be required in some cases
PER is achievable (adding PV would help to achieve targets)
Lighting and plug load must be reduced where feasible
› Internal gains
› Energy consumption
34. 34
Discussion + Questions
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE VISIT
www.rdh.com
www.buildingsciencelabs.com
OR CONTACT ME AT
ecatania@rdh.com