0637 Comparison of the System of Rice Intensification with Conventional Practice in Dung Toung, Kampot Province
•Télécharger en tant que PPT, PDF•
3 j'aime•1,901 vues
Presenters: Chuong Sophal and Sras Phanny
Recommandé
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Tendances
Tendances (20)
En vedette
En vedette (20)
Similaire à 0637 Comparison of the System of Rice Intensification with Conventional Practice in Dung Toung, Kampot Province
Similaire à 0637 Comparison of the System of Rice Intensification with Conventional Practice in Dung Toung, Kampot Province (20)
Plus de SRI-Rice, Dept. of Global Development, CALS, Cornell University
Plus de SRI-Rice, Dept. of Global Development, CALS, Cornell University (20)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
0637 Comparison of the System of Rice Intensification with Conventional Practice in Dung Toung, Kampot Province
- 1. COMPARISON OF THE SYSTEM OF RICE INTENSIFICATION WITH CONVENTIONAL PRACTICE IN DUNG TOUNG, KAMPOT PROVINCE By : Mr. CHUONG Sophal : Mr. SRAS Phanny Supported by Cambodian Agricultural Research Fund (CARF)
- 2. Objectives To study on the conventional practices To study the system of rice intensification (SRI) Comparison the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) and Conventional Practice Economic analysis
- 3. METHODOLOGY
- 6. Data collection is divided into two steps: 1-Primary data : interview with farmers. 40 farmers were selected: -20 SRI farmers : 10 local variety used-farmers and 10 modern variety used-farmers -20 Non-SRI farmers: 10 local variety used-farmers and 10 modern variety used-farmers 2-Secondary data : collecting from libraries . Data collection
- 7. COMPARISON BETWEEN THE SYSTEM OF RICE INTENSIFICATION WITH CONVENTIONAL PRACTICES
- 11. Spacing Spacing 29.85 23.4 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 SRI Non SRI cm
- 15. Results of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) and Conventional Practice
- 21. SRI Yields 5.1 3.921 4.00 3.405 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Riangchey N = 5 6 kour N=8 Riangchey N = 6 6 kour N = 8 NON SRI T/ha
- 22. Summary of analyzes by ANOVA ** ** ** ** 1000-seed weight ** ** ns ns Grains per panicle ** ** ns ns Yield ns ns ** ** Panicle length ** ** ** ** Tillers/hill Non-SRI 6 Kour SRI 6 Kour Non-SRI Rang Chey SRI Rang Chey
- 23. Grains per panicle 234 . 219 222 196 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Riangchey 6 kour Riangchey 6 kour SRI NON SRI grains
- 24. Weight per 1000 grains 25.8 22.8 22.4 21.5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Riangchey 6 kour Riangchey 6 kour SRI NON SRI grams
- 25. Number of plants per hill 11.12 9.05 9.06 10.73 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Riangchey 6 kour Riangchey 6 kour SRI NON SRI
- 26. Panicle length 28.8 26.6 25.6 25.5 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Riangchey 6 kour Riangchey 6 kour SRI NON SRI cm
- 29. Correlation between SRI Score and Yield Yield y = 30.694x + 3098.3 R 2 = 0.1637 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Score
- 30. Economical analysis Table11: Expenditure on SRI and Conventional practice 415.050 193.997 Total 230.616 66.572 Labor (riel/ha) 25.958 45.160 Irrigation (riel/ha) 158.476 82.265 Chemical fertilizers (riel/ha) Traditional technique SRI Expenses
- 31. Table12 : Expenses, Income, Profits of SRI and Conventional practice 381.493 1.120.470 1.501.963 Profits 221.053 415.050 193.997 Expenses 160.440 1.535.520 1.695.960 Income Differences Traditional SRI Description
- 34. THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION !