The Severn Estuary Forum is a key annual event in its eighth year and hosted by the Severn Estuary Partnership: an independent, estuary-wide initiative, involving all those interested in the management of the estuary, from planners to port authorities, fishermen to farmers.
This year’s Forum was opened by the Lord Mayor of Gloucester and supported by CIWEM. It focussed on a number of diverse topics, including the upper estuary; renewable energy possibilities; a review of the Severn Estuary Flood Risk Management Strategy; an overview of the operations and maintenance of the Severn River Crossings; Local Enterprise Partnerships; The Bristol Deep Sea Container Terminal; proposals for a Severnside Airport and Fisheries amongst others.
These engaging and exciting events are intended for all interested in learning about the latest research and policy developments dealing with the Severn Estuary and its future, and always guarantee a lively and informative day of presentations and talks. They offer a unique opportunity to learn from others, share ideas and participate in the management of the Severn Estuary.
2013 03 fish in the severn estuary - richard seaby
1. Fish in the
Severn Estuary
Dr Richard Seaby
Pisces Conservation Ltd.
richard@pisces-conservation.com
2. Our Severn Estuary Data Set is based on
regular sampling at power station intakes.
Monthly sampling commenced at Hinkley
Point B in 1980, and is still continuing.
Fish and macro-crustaceans are monitored on
the power station filter screens and plankton
nets are placed in the intake.
The Severn Estuary Data Set
3. Hinkley Point B is situated
on the edge of Bridgwater
Bay.
The maximum tidal range
is about 15 m and there
are extensive areas of
inter-tidal mud.
This macrotidal system
has suspended sediment
loads as high as 3 g per
litre.
Salinity ranges between
18 and 32 parts per
thousand.
The Habitat
4. The main energy input is detritus and
dissolved organic carbon, mostly of
terrestrial origin.
Within Bridgwater Bay there is little
planktonic or benthic primary
production, because of the turbidity
of the water and the instability of the
substrate.
For the Bristol Channel including
Bridgwater Bay, Joint & Pomroy
(1981) estimated annual primary
production to be only 6.8 g C m-2 y-1.
In comparison their estimate for the
outer Bristol Channel in the vicinity of
Lundy Island was 164.9 g C m-2 y-1.
Very little primary production
5. Fish species accumulation curve
100 randomisations of sample order
About 80 species of fish and
15 macro-crustaceans have
been recorded.
Fish Species Accumulation Curve
Species Number
100 ransomisations of sample order
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Species acquisition curves,
historical records and
published reports all suggest
that our Hinkley sampling
records all the resident and
most of the migratory fish
and macro-crustaceans
present between 1980 and
now.
50
100
150
200
Sample
250
300
350
The almost linear increase in
species after 100 samples is
due to the capture of
occasional migrants.
The larger mobile species
7. Fish populations are generally less stable in estuaries than in the open sea.
This is because the populations usually comprise the younger age classes, and
species that only utilise the estuary for a proportion of their life.
Shown here are two common species, whiting and flounder, fish populations that
are observed to be fluctuating around reasonably constant levels.
These examples lend support to the view that density-dependent control is
operating.
Long-term stability in fish populations
8. The monthly abundance of whiting Merlangius merlangus
between the years 1980 and 2011 in the Severn Estuary.
The trend line is a 12-month moving average.
The monthly abundance of flounder Platichthys flesus
between the years 1980 and 2011 in the Severn Estuary.
The trend line is a 12-month moving average.
Whiting and flounder dynamics
9. The monthly
abundance of eel,
Anguilla anguilla,
between the years
1980 and 2011 in the
Severn Estuary.
An example of exponential decline - the eel
10. A 30-year study of the estuarine population of yellow eel, Anguilla
anguilla, abundance in Bridgwater Bay, Somerset, UK, shows that
the population number has collapsed. Since 1980, the decline has
averaged 15% per year. The abundance of eel in 2009 is estimated at
only 1% of that in 1980.
Henderson, P., Plenty, S., Newton, L. and Bird, D. (2011) Evidence for a population collapse
of European eel (Anguilla anguilla) in the Bristol Channel. Journal of the Marine Biological
Association of the United Kingdom . pp. 1-9. ISSN 0025-3154
An example of exponential decline - the eel
12. Note that abundance is a log
scale, so an exponential gives
a straight line – the increase
over the last 32 years is
approximately exponential.
An example of exponential increase - the sole
13. Annual captures of snake pipefish in
Bridgwater Bay, Somerset 1981-2013
600
The snake pipefish – a short population
explosion – hardly present for 2 decades
Annual number caught
500
400
300
200
100
0
1980
1990
2000
Year
Dangers of short-term sampling
2010
14. Threats to marine life
There are many threats to the marine life in the Severn.
It is an important estuary that has been developed and industrialized over a
long period, and this development is unlikely to stop in the foreseeable future.
Now I will briefly outline some of the major impacts and the threats
they produce to the fish of the Severn
Threats to marine life
15. Obstructions to movement.
These have had great effects
e.g. on Salmon, Shad and Lamprey
• Anadromous fish move from the
sea up rivers to spawn.
Obstructions to their movement
have been particularly disastrous.
• For example: In the River Severn
“Lampreys too, which were formerly
considered of more importance
than salmon, and were caught in
the upper Severn, have altogether
ceased to visit it since the erection
of the first weir in 1843”.
A particular estuarine problem
23. With all the changes that are occurring in
the Severn estuary, it is important to
remember how complex the interactions are
between the many species of fish in the
estuary and the environment in which they
live.
A changing world
24. Fish species recorded January-December
60
55
15
Year vs Total species number
Year vs Total species number: 1992
Year vs Ave temp
14
50
13
45
12
40
11
35
10
30
1980
1990
2000
9
2010
Average seawater temperature January-December
Temporal variation in species number and average seawater temperature
Species richness has
been increasing from
about 35 to greater
than 40 per year.
Over the same period
average temperature
has also increased.
Year
Changes in fish species richness
27. In part these
changes can be
related to physical
change in
temperature, salinit
y and NAO
28. A conclusion
Animal populations can behave in surprising ways.
We need to continue collecting and recording if we are
to create the data sets that will lead to the predictive
science we desire, that allow us to predict the impacts
we have on the aquatic environment.
Notes de l'éditeur
Fish populations change over time To understand the relationships between and impacts on fish long term data is needed
Estuaries naturally dynamicOnly some part of lifeSome species are fairly static – often very seasonal
Whiting and autumn/ winter speciesFlounder and spring and summer species
Some species are doing badlyNew eel regulations to protect the species
More obvious looking at the annual dataA multifactorial problem – this does not mean that doing nothing is an option – species in decline all mortality matters no density dependence.
There is good news tooHere the sole can be seen to be increasing
Again more oblivious in annual numbers
Most survey are point or short timescale It is worth noting that short surveys can easily be caught out.Such as snake pipefishAlso red gurnard, grey gurnard, sardine crab
Why does it matter that we understand these patternsLong term – short term damages – Seasonal WindowsI will now briefly review some of the impacts we have been working on in the SevernSome short termSome many years
Estuaries have particular importance to Migratory fish – salmonids, shads, eels, etc are all doing poorlyThey meet mankind in too many places – they need unobstructed rivers – weirs, mills etc pass through major cities to get to the cleaner headwaters Impacted by habitats loss (quality and area) Fishing pressure at sea and in river
The most obviousNot much commercial fishing in the upper estuary – conditions are difficultSome fixed engine fisheries – mostly stopped
So now a quick review of more specific impactsIntakes – many and variedImpingement and entrainment, Often long term effect – 20- 40 Years
Thermal – barriers and stressChemical – stress and accumulation
For access i.e. ports, intakes etc.For aggregatesNoiseLoss of habitatResuspension of sediments and contaminantsDirect impingementA mix of long and short term effects
Flood defenceReclamationSedimentation regimes changeVery long term
Construction – piling, sedimentOperation - Sediment changeRestriction to habitatBlade strikePressure changesChemical/physical changes in the water quality 02, sediment load, temperature
I thought to sum up I would show a few of the changes we have been observing In the 30 + years of data we have
Including the macro crustaceansAll crust increasingGraphs with lines have significant relation ships
More significant relationship – Some of these will be species to species drivenSome will be human impactSome large scale climatic effects
Most relationships will be multifactorial,man, climate and interspecies