Potential Difference Inc has developed three new energy innovations that make global warming issues moot: 1. A ReGenX Generator that can accelerate itself under load and deliver infinite electrical power compared to conventional generators. 2. A Bi-Toroid Transformer that operates with infinite efficiency and only consumes reactive power but delivers real power. 3. A ReGen-X Motor that can recapture all motor coil flux and produce torque with zero net power consumption.

1. PotentialDifferenceCanadaInc.
2013
HAPPYMOTEREARTHDAY
Potential Difference Inc has developed three new energy innovations
which now all make the Global Warming issue moot…
The first innovation is the ReGenX Generator which has the proven
ability to accelerate itself under load and the capacity to deliver an
infinite amount more electrical power when compared to a
conventional generator under identical conditions:
2009 Test Data from NRC Scientist Doug Hartwich:
https://www.box.net/s/kqo8knpgk7femc0jldnz
The second innovation is a Bi-Toroid Transformer which operates with
infinite efficiency and only consumes reactive power but delivers real
power to the load. Canadian Defence Research and Development
scientist Dr. Giovanni Fusina independent third party test data:
https://www.box.com/files/email/thaneh@potentialdifference.ca/0/f/
82938692/1/f_721619244
The third innovation is the ReGen-X Motor which has the ability to
recapture all motor coil magnetic flux into a ReGenX generator coil
and produce torque with NET zero power consumption.
If humanity does not
opt for integrity we are
through completely. It
is absolutely touch and
go. Each one of us could
make the difference.
~ R. Buckminster Fuller

2. POTENTIAL +/- DIFFERENCE INC.
2009 NRC / Ottawa University ReGenX Prototype 2 Test Set-Up
Page 2
Regenerative Acceleration (ReGenX) Electric Generator
Potential Difference Inc. has developed a new electric generator at the University of Ottawa
which has the capacity to accelerate itself when delivering power to a load and has the proven
capacity to deliver over 800% more electrical output power to a load over any conventional
generator currently used today. And it does so with over 60% less input power.
Independent third party tests performed at the University of Ottawa by a National Research
Council scientist Doug Hartwick:
https://www.box.com/files/email/thaneh@potentialdifference.ca/0/f/82938692/1/f_721619244#/files/0/f/0/1/f_5554651590 .
Bi-Toroid Transformer
Potential Difference has developed a new electric transformer at the University of Ottawa which
has the capacity to consume only Pure Reactive power in the Primary but deliver Real Power to
the load and operate well over 100% efficiency:
Independent third party tests performed at the University of Ottawa by a Canadian Defence
Research and Development scientist Dr. Giovanni Fusina:
https://www.box.com/files/email/thaneh@potentialdifference.ca/0/f/82938692/1/f_721619244

3. POTENTIAL +/- DIFFERENCE INC.
2009 NRC / Ottawa University ReGenX Prototype 2 Test Set-Up
Page 3
Diagram 1.0 ReGenX Generator Coil and Conventional Generator Coil Set-Up
2009 Test Data from NRC Scientist Doug Hartwich: https://www.box.net/s/kqo8knpgk7femc0jldnz
2009 Test Video – Conventional Generator Armature Reaction vs ReGenX Generator Armature Reaction:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgHFhNMkDiw&list=PLkH1zLdXy1SypPD7inxAYi8MjkQk91syC&index=1

4. POTENTIAL +/- DIFFERENCE INC.
2009 NRC / Ottawa University ReGenX Prototype 2 Test Set-Up
Page 4
Test Goals and Methodology 2009 Conventional Generator vs ReGenX Generator:
The Doug Hartwich ReGenX test goals were focused on recording the conventional generator’s armature reaction and
the ReGenX generator’s armature reaction at identical no-load input motor speeds to ensure that;
1. The drive shaft torque was identical in both cases and,
2. The motor efficiency was identical in both cases.
2009 Test Observations
Line 4:
The no-load speed was set at roughly 2100 RPM and the input and output values recorded.
Line 5:
When the conventional generator coil was loaded through a 10 ohm load delivering 1.26 Watts to the load – the
system decelerated as expected and the prime mover input power had to be increased by 12.3% (row H) to maintain
the system speed of 2100 RPM and steady state continuous power through the load.
Line 7:
When the Regenerative Acceleration Generator (ReGenX) Coils were engaged the system accelerated as expected and
the prime mover input power had to be reduced by 40.2% to maintain the same steady state speed of roughly 2100
RPM.
It was observed and recorded that the ReGenX generator delivered 223.8% more power to the same 10 ohm load at
the same 2100 RPM steady state speed (row H) but with a 40.2% reduction in input power required to do so.
Line 9:
When the ReGenX coils were removed and the system was allowed to operate in conventional generator mode with
the same 40.2% input reduction as in Line 7, the result was that the conventional generator coil decelerated the
system down to a dead stop while the input to the prime mover increased by 35% in a failed attempt to prevent
system deceleration.
The ReGenX generator delivered a continuous 4.08 Watts to the load with a 40% reduction in prime mover input
power (from Line 5) at a steady state speed of 2100 RPM – while the conventional generator delivered a continuous
0.0 Watts to the same load with a 35% increase in prime mover input at a steady state speed of 0 RPM.
Performance advantage: ReGenX Generator Output / Conventional Generator Output x 100
4.08/0.0 x 100
= infinite%
Performance advantage ReGenX Generator vs Conventional Generator = Infinite%

5. POTENTIAL +/- DIFFERENCE INC.
2009 NRC / Ottawa University ReGenX Prototype 2 Test Set-Up
Page 5
Line 11
When the ReGenX generator was allowed to accelerate itself without reducing the input (by 40.2%) to maintain
identical steady state speeds as per Line 7 the system accelerated to the full speed of the prime mover/motor and the
generator output increased to 16.1 Watts while the input power dropped by 62% from the initial no-load setting.
When the ReGenX coil was then removed the system decelerated down to a virtual dead stop with the generator
output equaling 0.001 Watts.
Performance advantage ReGenX Generator vs Conventional Generator = 1,610,000%
2009 Test Conclusions
The conventional generator coil creates an electromagnetically induced counter-torque/ armature reaction
which decelerates the system when placed on-load and additional power must be returned to the input to
maintain steady state power to the load.
The more power delivered to the load in the conventional generator paradigm - the more power must be
returned to keep the system running. The amount of power returned always exceeds the amount of power
delivered due to losses in the system.
The Regenerative Acceleration Generator coil on the other hand creates an electromagnetically induced
complimentary-torque/ armature reaction which accelerates the system when placed on-load and a
reduction in power must be delivered to the input if a fixed steady state power and speed are desired.
The more power delivered to the load in the ReGenX generator paradigm - the less power must be returned
to keep the system running. The discharging magnetic flux from the ReGenX coils also does two beneficial
things simultaneously 1) It accelerates the rotor and negates the conventional coil armature reaction 2) It
adds to the permanent magnet rotor flux being delivered to the conventional coil’s core and supplements
the conventional coil’s power by an additional 15%.
Overall ReGenX Generator Innovation Performance Advantage over Conventional Generators
At any steady state speed with a fixed prime mover input the conventional generator will always
decelerate the system down to a dead stop if the load is great enough – whereas the ReGenX generator will
never decelerate the system and the performance advantage will always = infinity.
Thane C. Heins
President & CEO
Potential +/- Difference Inc. R & D
"Change catalysts using our potential to make a positive difference"
Email: thaneh@potentialdifference.ca
Cell: 613.795.1602
YOUTUBE http://www.youtube.com/user/pdicanada1
LinkedInihttp://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=107557432&trk=tab_pro
slideshare http://www.slideshare.net/ThaneCHeins

6. POTENTIAL +/- DIFFERENCE INC.
2009 NRC / Ottawa University ReGenX Prototype 2 Test Set-Up
Page 6
Technology Endorsements & Industry Comments
"As a mechanical engineer I'm here to explain how it works and why it works. And it does
work; over a dozen of us were witness to that last Monday (as well as a film crew--filming in
3D no less!)."
-Mike Brace, Tech Editor EV World (2012)
"This is the holy grail for generators."
-NRC Scientist Doug Hartwick at Ottawa University (2009)
"This is a freakin' game changer!"
-Mike Elwood, Chairman Electric Mobility Canada at Ottawa University (2009)
"Of course it accelerates when a load is applied...! This represents several new chapters in
physics, that is why we are consulting MIT."
-Dr. Habash, University of Ottawa (2007)
"It works and it is not something I would have expected, now I am just trying to figure it out?"
-Dr. Marcus Zahn at MIT (2007)
"A number of your experiments are not lying in the field of Maxwellian electrodynamics? That
is fascinating! I will inform you on any progress that i'll make along with reports."
-Dr. Evstigneev N.M., leading sc., dep. of chaotic dynamics, Institute for System
analysis, Russian Academy of Science. (2009)
"Your claims seem to violate the law of conservation of energy and Maxwell's equations of
electro-magnetics." I will send you a short proposal, including my plan of work, estimate of
cost, etc. Then we can sign a short agreement and proceed."
-Mehrdad (Mark) Ehsani, Ph.D., P.E., F.IEEE, F.SAE, Robert M. Kennedy Professor &
Director, Power Electronics and Motor Drives Laboratory & Advanced Vehicle Systems
Research Program, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Texas A&M
University
"This is absolutely fascinating stuff you are doing!"
-Joseph Shin, Electricity and Magnetism Professor, Concordia University (2011)

7. POTENTIAL +/- DIFFERENCE INC.
2009 NRC / Ottawa University ReGenX Prototype 2 Test Set-Up
Page 7
"If possible would like to meet with you to discuss your approach to the Association and of
course to get a better feel about the physics behind your invention. I would still like to see
what you are doing and perhaps we can include some of your material on our website
newsletter?"
-David Mann, Canadian Association for the Advancement of Science (2009)
"Thane, Your Press Release was most interesting to me as a physicist & an engineer. The
level of technical detail was adequate to tell me that you probably have made a very
significant advance in applied physics & in safely and successfully handling a new source of
electric power. Congratulations!"
-Dr. Stanley Townsend, University of Toronto & Former Managing Editor of the
Canadian Journal of Physics (2006)
"We are interested in using the ReGenX technology in our LinkVolt Project to reduce roadside
refueling."
-Neil Young, LincVolt Project (2011)
"The magnetics lab here at Goddard expressed some interest in having you come down to do
a colloquium."
-NASA (2008)
"We really are more interested in developing its use and application for military power
requirements."
-US Air Force (2009)
"I have asked Mr. Gilles Brassard, A/Director, Spacecraft Payload here at the Canadian
Space Agency to look at your technologies and to visit your laboratory."
-Canadian Space Agency (2009)
"I am writing to ask you to submit what you feel would be an appropriate document to
describe your regenerative acceleration technology for circulation to our Committee
members."
-Al Cormier, Executive Director Electric Mobility Canada (2009)
"You seem to have made an interesting discovery. Our internal physics experts review this
information and have determined that it is very interesting work."
-Mike Simpson, Transportation Analyst Rocky Mountain Institute (2009)
"Would you be willing to contribute an article on this technology to the Journal for Engineering
and Public Policy?"

8. POTENTIAL +/- DIFFERENCE INC.
2009 NRC / Ottawa University ReGenX Prototype 2 Test Set-Up
Page 8
-Donald Wallace, Executive Director Ontario Centre for Engineering and Public Policy
(2009)
"Thanks for providing technical information. If the effect of your invention is really true, I am
sure there will be strong needs in the market."
-Nissan Japan (2012)
"I would like to know why you are not the toast of the town... this technology can be offered as
a range extension option to our clients."
-Thomas Fritz, Vice President Electric Vehicle Operations, CODA Automotive (2012)
"The technology looks really interesting and is revolutionary. I would like to learn more about
the technology. Is it possible to organize a demo or a lecture in the USA?"
-Chrysler Electrified Powertrains (2012)
"This sounds interesting. I'd like you to connect with our Fuel Economy Learning Program
manager, to schedule a time for you to come in and share the technology with us. We need to
know more about the Physics behind it."
-General Motors (2012)
"It would be fitting for the inventor of the automobile to be first with your revolutionary
technology and for me to play a role in that would be awesome!"
-Mercedes-Benz (2012)
"When we finally understand what Thane Heins has discovered, we likely will have to rewrite
the laws of electromagnetism."
-Mike Brace EV World Tech Editor (2010)