What do we mean by identity, diversity and multiculturalism? How do we define ourselves to our selves and to others? How does our self-definition affect how we recommend books to others?
2. Possible Generic Framework
Reader
Presence in Book*
Race
Ethn.
Nat.
Cult.
Rel.
Gend
Class
Orien
Reg.
Dis.
Race
Ethnicity
Nationality
Culture
Region
Gender
Class
Orientation
Religion
Disability
Age
Language
Familial
Profession
* - Not Present, Specific, Generic, Inferred, Neutral
Age
Lang.
Fam
Prof
3. Ordinal Ranking Issue
Reader A
Reader B
Reader C
Reader D
Reader E
Race
Gender
Orientation
Disability
Class
Age
Nationality
Ethnicity
Culture
Region
Religion
Language
Familial
Profession
Familial
Religion
Nationality
Culture
Region
Profession
Class
Age
Race
Ethnicity
Disability
Language
Orientation
Class
Nationality
Culture
Religion
Region
Language
Profession
Class
Familial
Religion
Ethnicity
Age
Race
Disability
Orientation
Disability
Familial
Region
Class
Gender
Age
Class
Profession
Nationality
Ethnicity
Culture
Language
Religion
Orientation
Class
Familial
Profession
Culture
Religion
Gender
Class
Age
Region
Ethnicity
Orientation
Language
Disability
Language
4. Trade-Off Ranking Issue
Reader A
Reader B
Reader C
Reader CD
Reader E
Race
40%
Familial
60%
Nationality
30%
Disability
25%
Class
30%
Gender
20%
Religion
20%
Culture
30%
Familial
10%
Familial
25%
Orientation
10%
Nationality
2%
Religion
15%
Region
10%
Profession
20%
Disability
5%
Culture
2%
Region
5%
Class
5%
Culture
10%
Class
3%
Region
2%
Language
5%
Gender
5%
Religion
5%
Age
3%
Profession
2%
Profession
3%
Age
5%
Gender
3%
Nationality
3%
Class
2%
Class
3%
Race
5%
Race
1%
Ethnicity
3%
Age
2%
Familial
2%
Profession
5%
Age
1%
Culture
3%
Race
2%
Religion
2%
Nationality
5%
Region
1%
Region
3%
Ethnicity
2%
Ethnicity
1%
Ethnicity
5%
Ethnicity
1%
Religion
2%
Disability
2%
Age
1%
Culture
5%
Orientation
1%
Language
2%
Language
1%
Race
1%
Language
5%
Language
1%
Familial
2%
Orientation
1%
Disability
1%
Religion
5%
Disability
1%
Profession
1%
Class
0%
Orientation
1%
Orientation
5%
Language
1%
5. Variability by Age Issue
Reader A
Familial
60%
Religion
20%
Nationality
2%
Culture
2%
Region
2%
Profession
2%
Class
2%
Age
2%
Race
2%
Ethnicity
2%
Disability
2%
Language
1%
Orientation
1%
Class
0%
Child
Adult
Mature
Retiree
6. Variability by Context Issue
Reader A
Familial
60%
Religion
20%
Nationality
2%
Culture
2%
Region
2%
Profession
2%
Class
2%
Age
2%
Race
2%
Ethnicity
2%
Disability
2%
Language
1%
Orientation
1%
Class
0%
Travel
Office
Church
Strangers
7. Variability by Circumstance Issue
Reader A
Familial
60%
Religion
20%
Nationality
2%
Culture
2%
Region
2%
Profession
2%
Class
2%
Age
2%
Race
2%
Ethnicity
2%
Disability
2%
Language
1%
Orientation
1%
Class
0%
Outsider/
Insider
Happy/Sad
Secure/
Threatened
Healthy/Ill
8. Identity and Books
Reader
Presence in Book*
Race
Ethn.
Nat.
Cult.
Rel.
Gend
Class
Orien
Reg.
Dis.
Race
Ethnicity
Nationality
Culture
Region
Gender
Class
Orientation
Religion
Disability
Age
Language
Familial
Profession
* - Not Present, Specific, Generic, Inferred, Neutral
Age
Lang.
Fam
Prof
9. Potential Recommendation
Consequences
Outcome
Don’t Comprehend
That Others have
Different Self-Definition
Unrecognized
Alternative
Definition
My SelfIdentification
No Effective
Recommendations
Race, Age, Gender
Interests, Culture, Class
Outcome
Comprehend That Others
have Different SelfDefinition But Don’t
Recognize Reference
Limitation
My SelfIdentification
Recognized
Alternative
Definition
Race, Age, Gender
Interests, Culture, Class
A Few
Recommendations
10. Ideal Recommendation Consequences
Outcome
Comprehend That Others
have Different SelfDefinition And Able to
Make Recommendations
Pertinent to Those
Definitions
Recognized
Alternative
Definition
My SelfIdentification
Many Effective
Recommendations
Even Though
Different
Race, Age, Gender
Interests, Culture, Class
Notes de l'éditeur
What are the attributes by which individuals electively self-identify? Hard to determine because it is often context specific, variable by circumstance, and varies over time. Listed are some common attributes. Many potential self-identifications are omitted: neighborhood, interests, hobbies, employer, education attainment, education institution, sports, music, books, instrument, etc.It is particularly unclear as to what are the attributes by which children self-identify. It is not clear that they correspond with those important to adults. Challenges:Even within these attributes, people often define them somewhat differently. Example: is class SES, income, manners, or something else? Is Religion, Christian, Protestant, or Methodist?
Even if we nail down which attributes an individual wishes to use for self-identification and also nail down exactly what we mean by each attribute, the bigger issue is different ordinal rankings. Some identity themselves primarily by race or religion or nationality, etc.How does a person choose to identify themselves and in what order?
Even if we nail down the ordinal ranking, there is the weighting that can differ. For one person, their number one attribute of identity is their race. Not only that but it is very heavily weighted, say 70% of their self-identity is wrapped up in their race. A second person may have Profession as her number one ordinal form of identity but only invest 20% of her self-identity in that attribute.
There is the further complication that how we identify ourselves to ourselves and to others changes over time.When I am young, I may have a sharply limited self-concept. As a young adult, I may strongly affiliate with my university or sorority. As a mature adult, perhaps now by profession or employer. As a retiree, perhaps by hobby.
There is the further complication that how we identify ourselves to ourselves and to other changes by context.In my home town I might identify myself by the neighborhood where I live but when I am travelling internationally I might identify myself by my nationality or state.
There is the complication that how we identify ourselves to ourselves and to other changes by circumstance.When I feel threatened, I am may identify more with attributes that reassure me (family or religion for example).
So given the issue of attributes, definitions, ordinal ranking, circumstantial variability, contextual variability, and variability over time, What are the pertinent elements in a book with which I might identify?Raises the importance of knowing your target when making recommendations. Probably explains why most people identify sources of recommendations as being those closest to them (family, friends, teachers, etc.)Also explains why recommendations are hard and often hit/or miss. A librarian making a recommendation has to have an almost impossible level of nuanced knowledge of the child and circumstance. Two sources of mismatch – 1) How I define myself may blind me to how others define themselves and 2) How I define myself may blind me to what others will find interesting.