3. Remote and virtual laboratories in
science teaching
Remote labs and primary/secondary
school classrooms: Existing barriers
4. Remote and virtual laboratories in
science teaching
Remote labs and primary/secondary
school classrooms: Existing barriers
The “UniSchooLabS” project
approach and using remote labs in
the classroom: A toolkit for teachers
5. Remote and virtual laboratories in
science teaching
Remote labs and primary/secondary
school classrooms: Existing barriers
The “UniSchooLabS” project
approach and using remote labs in
the classroom: A toolkit for teachers
What is next? Steps to set up a
larger scale provider-school
collaboration
6. UniSchooLabS is funded with support from the European
Commission.
This presentation reflects the views only of the author, and
the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use
which may be made of the information contained therein.
7. Remote and virtual laboratories in
science teaching
Run by a university or science
center
8. Remote and virtual laboratories in
science teaching
Web cam to observe in real time
9. Remote and virtual laboratories in
science teaching
Learner controls the equipment
10. Remote and virtual laboratories in
science teaching
Simulation of real-world
experimental data
11. Remote and virtual laboratories in
science teaching
Simulation of real-world
experimental data
18. Remote and virtual laboratories in
science teaching
Do students learn less without hands-on experiences
?
19. Klahr, D., Triona, L. M., &
Williams, C. (2007).
Hands on what? The relative
effectiveness of physical versus
virtual materials in an
engineering design project by
middle school children.
Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 44, 183-203.
20. Experiment with 7th and 8th graders
Their task:
• building toy vehicles with different features!
• understand causal variables!
• Discovery approach for experimenting with
21. Experiment with 7th and 8th graders
Their task:
• building toy vehicles with different features!
• understand causal variables!
• Discovery approach for experimenting with
Physical material
22. Experiment with 7th and 8th graders
Their task:
• building toy vehicles with different features!
• understand causal variables!
• Discovery approach for experimenting with
Physical material Virtual programme
23. Results showed no difference in performance
(Klahr, D., Triona, L. M., & Williams, C., 2007)
Physical material Virtual programme
24. Remote labs and primary/secondary
school classrooms
Existing barriers
25. Lack of awareness about existence &
accessibility of labs among science teachers #1
27. Most teaching and learning material of
remote labs
– not geared towards younger students of
a specific age group
#3
• Pioneer teachers are not networked.
• Demands well-established school
university collaboration.
28. Most teaching and learning material of
remote labs
– not geared towards younger students of
a specific age group
#3
– not available in many languages.
• Pioneer teachers are not networked.
#4
• Demands well-established school
university collaboration.
32. Good Practice Analysis
Remote labs and pedagogical approaches
Creating an online toolkit to make access to remote labs easier.
Promote inquiry based and problem solving approaches to science education
Involving pilot Ensuring collaboration
Technical Development
teachers with laboratory providers
Test & Improve the Toolkit
10 pilot teachers
Validated
200 students
• Questionnaires and focus group toolkit
• Interviews with laboratory providers
33. Good Practice Analysis
Remote labs and pedagogical approaches
Creating an online toolkit to make access to remote labs easier.
Promote inquiry based and problem solving approaches to science education
Involving pilot Ensuring collaboration
Technical Development
teachers with laboratory providers
Test & Improve the Toolkit
10 pilot teachers
Validated
200 students
• Questionnaires and focus group toolkit
• Interviews with laboratory providers
34. Good Practice Analysis
Remote labs and pedagogical approaches
Creating an online toolkit to make access to remote labs easier.
Promote inquiry based and problem solving approaches to science education
Involving pilot Ensuring collaboration
Technical Development
teachers with laboratory providers
Test & Improve the Toolkit
10 pilot teachers
Validated
200 students
• Questionnaires and focus group toolkit
• Interviews with laboratory providers
35. Lab catalogue
9 remote labs
Lab activity editor
Teacher create and share
online activities for students
Lab notebook
Students „publish“ results of
experiments and discussions
42. IBSE: Its effects
Curiousity
Interest
Motivation
Inclusion
Better effects with
Self-esteem disadvantaged students and
those with below-average
learning outcomes
43. IBSE: Its effects
Increase
Increase
Increase
Curiousity
Interest
Motivation
Inclusion
Better effects with
Self-esteem disadvantaged students and
those with below-average
learning outcomes
44. Lab catalogue
9 remote labs
Lab activity editor
Teacher create and share
online activities for students
Lab notebook
Students „publish“ results of
experiments and discussions
45. Train & Present the Toolkit Towards a sustainable coordination
and Collaboration Model structure of collaboration between
To teachers, lab schools and universities
owners, researchers, science
communicators Align & Coordinate
• 3 national workshops Feasibility study on a permanent
• 2 international workshops coordination entity
Community of users and Policy recommendations
lab providers Establishing a closer and mutual
collaboration on science education
between schools and universities
46. “It’s lab time – Connecting Schools to Universities’ Remote
Laboratories”
Workshop organized by SCIENTER
in collaboration with the Faculty of Electrical Engineering
University of Bologna
Bologna, Viale Risorgimento, 2
Friday, March 30th
47. Try out the toolkit yourself!
http://unischoolabs.eun.org
Contact us
Anne-Christin Tannhäuser Claudio Dondi
actannhauser@scienter.org cdondi@scienter.org
Notes de l'éditeur
Current studies challenge “the conventional wisdom that students learn more via hands-on experience”
Current studies challenge “the conventional wisdom that students learn more via hands-on experience”
Current studies challenge “the conventional wisdom that students learn more via hands-on experience”
Current studies challenge “the conventional wisdom that students learn more via hands-on experience”
Current studies challenge “the conventional wisdom that students learn more via hands-on experience”
Current studies challenge “the conventional wisdom that students learn more via hands-on experience”
Vision buildingschool-university collaboration to increase students’ access to high-quality laboratoriesWhat current initatives to build on?