Contenu connexe Similaire à Elections and Campaigns (13) Plus de Chris Thomas (20) Elections and Campaigns2. Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
WHO GOVERNS?WHO GOVERNS?
1.1. How do American elections determineHow do American elections determine
the kind of people who govern us?the kind of people who govern us?
2.2. What matters most in deciding whoWhat matters most in deciding who
wins presidential and congressionalwins presidential and congressional
elections?elections?
TO WHAT ENDS?TO WHAT ENDS?
1.1. Do elections make a real difference inDo elections make a real difference in
what laws get passed?what laws get passed?
3. Campaigns, Then and NowCampaigns, Then and Now
Campaign tasksCampaign tasks
performed byperformed by
• Media consultantsMedia consultants
• Direct mail firmsDirect mail firms
• Polling firmsPolling firms
• Political technology firmsPolitical technology firms
Better or Worse?Better or Worse?
Here and AbroadHere and Abroad
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Hillary Clinton
running for president
in 2008, p. 224
Charlie Neibergall/AP Photo
4. Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Source: Federal Election Commission, 2008 election summary reports, May 2009.Source: Federal Election Commission, 2008 election summary reports, May 2009.
5. Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Source: Adapted from Federal Election Commission, summary reports, January 2009 and May 2009. Dollar figuresSource: Adapted from Federal Election Commission, summary reports, January 2009 and May 2009. Dollar figures
rounded. Inflation adjustment keyed to consumer price index 1976–2008, 3.74 (i.e., assumes that what cost $1.00 inrounded. Inflation adjustment keyed to consumer price index 1976–2008, 3.74 (i.e., assumes that what cost $1.00 in
1976 cost $3.74 in 2008).1976 cost $3.74 in 2008).
6. Figure 10.1 Presidential Campaigns,Figure 10.1 Presidential Campaigns,
Spending on Media, 2009Spending on Media, 2009
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Source: Federal Election Commission, summary reports, May 2009. Figures rounded.Source: Federal Election Commission, summary reports, May 2009. Figures rounded.
7. Presidential versusPresidential versus
Congressional CampaignsCongressional Campaigns
Running for PresidentRunning for President
• MoneyMoney
• OrganizationOrganization
• Strategy and themesStrategy and themes
Getting elected toGetting elected to
CongressCongress
• Winning the primaryWinning the primary
• Staying in officeStaying in office
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Political campaigns are hard
work, even when you get to
fly on the vice president’s
airplane. p. 229
Tomas Muscionico/Contact Press Images
8. Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census.Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
9. Primary versus GeneralPrimary versus General
CampaignsCampaigns
Two kinds of campaign issuesTwo kinds of campaign issues
• PositionPosition
• ValenceValence
Television, Debates and Direct MailTelevision, Debates and Direct Mail
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
11. Politically Speaking:Politically Speaking:
Clothespin VoteClothespin Vote
The vote cast by a person whoThe vote cast by a person who
does not like either candidatedoes not like either candidate
and so votes for the lessand so votes for the less
objectionable of the two, puttingobjectionable of the two, putting
a clothespin over his or her nosea clothespin over his or her nose
to keep out the unpleasantto keep out the unpleasant
stench. p. 235stench. p. 235
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
12. In the 1888 presidential campaign,In the 1888 presidential campaign,
supporters of Benjamin Harrisonsupporters of Benjamin Harrison
rolled a huge ball covered withrolled a huge ball covered with
campaign slogans across thecampaign slogans across the
country. The gimmick, first used incountry. The gimmick, first used in
1840, gave rise to the phrase “keep1840, gave rise to the phrase “keep
the ball rolling.” p. 239the ball rolling.” p. 239
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Alaska Governor SarahAlaska Governor Sarah
Palin debates SenatorPalin debates Senator
Joe Biden during theJoe Biden during the
2008 campaign. p. 2392008 campaign. p. 239
Library of Congress
Rick Wiking, Pool, File/AP Photo
13. MoneyMoney
The Sources of Campaign MoneyThe Sources of Campaign Money
Campaign Finance RulesCampaign Finance Rules
A Second Campaign Finance LawA Second Campaign Finance Law
New Sources of MoneyNew Sources of Money
Money and WinningMoney and Winning
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
14. Candidates first madeCandidates first made
phonographic recordings ofphonographic recordings of
their speeches in 1908.their speeches in 1908.
Warren G. Harding isWarren G. Harding is
shown here recording ashown here recording a
speech during the 1920speech during the 1920
campaign, p. 240campaign, p. 240
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
John F. Kennedy andJohn F. Kennedy and
Richard Nixon debate duringRichard Nixon debate during
the 1960 presidentialthe 1960 presidential
campaign, p. 240campaign, p. 240
Bettmann/CORBIS
Paul Schutzer/ Time Life
Pictures/ Getty Images
16. Figure 10.2 Growth of PACsFigure 10.2 Growth of PACs
1979–20091979–2009
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Source: Federal Election Commission, March 9, 2009
17. Source:Source: The New York Times,The New York Times,
November 14, 2008November 14, 2008..
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
18. Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Source: Federal Election Commission, March 2, 2009.
20. What Decides the Election?What Decides the Election?
PartyParty
Issues, Especially the EconomyIssues, Especially the Economy
• Prospective votingProspective voting
• Retrospective votingRetrospective voting
The CampaignThe Campaign
Finding a Winning CoalitionFinding a Winning Coalition
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
21. Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
a The figures for
1980, 1984, 1988,
and 1996 fail to
add up to 100
percent because of
missing data.
22. Figure 10.4 The Economy and VoteFigure 10.4 The Economy and Vote
for President, 1948–2004for President, 1948–2004
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Source: From
American Public
Opinion, 5th ed.,
by Robert S.
Erikson
and Kent L. Tedin.
Copyright © 1995
by Addison-
Wesley
Educational
Publishers, Inc.
Reprinted by
permission of
Pearson
Education, Inc.
23. Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Sources: For 1964–1976:
Gallup poll data, as
tabulated in Jeane J.
Kirkpatrick, “Changing
Patterns of Electoral
Competition,” in The New
American Political
System, ed. Anthony
King (Washington, D.C.:
American Enterprise
Institute, 1978), 254–
256. For 1980–1992:
Data from
New York Times/CBS
News exit polls. For
1996: Congressional
Quarterly Weekly Report,
1997, p. 188, For 2000:
Exit polls supplied by
ABC News. For 2004 and
2008, CNN exit polls.
24. Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Union members were onceUnion members were once
heavily Democratic, butheavily Democratic, but
since Ronald Reagansince Ronald Reagan
began winning white unionbegan winning white union
votes in 1980, these votesvotes in 1980, these votes
have been up for grabs. p.have been up for grabs. p.
252252
At a public meeting, Samuel JosephAt a public meeting, Samuel Joseph
Wurzelbacher challenged Barack Obama onWurzelbacher challenged Barack Obama on
his tax plan and quickly became known ashis tax plan and quickly became known as
“Joe the Plumber.” p. 252“Joe the Plumber.” p. 252
Bettmann/Corbis
Al Goldis/ AP Photo
25. Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Sources: For 1964–1976: Gallup poll data, as tabulated in Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, “Changing Patterns of Electoral Competition,” in The
New American Political System, ed. Anthony King (Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1978), 254–256. For 1980–1992:
Data from New York Times/CBS News exit polls. For 1996: Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 1997, p. 188, For 2000: Exit polls
supplied by ABC News. For 2004 and 2008, CNN exit polls.
26. Figure 10.5 Partisan Division of theFigure 10.5 Partisan Division of the
Presidential Vote, 1856-2008Presidential Vote, 1856-2008
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Sources: Information for 1856–1988, updated from Historical Data Archive, Inter-University Consortium for
Political Research, as reported in William H. Flanigan and Nancy H. Zingale, Political Behavior of the American
Electorate, 3rd ed., 32. For 1992: World Almanac and Book of Facts 1994, 73.
27. M E M O R A N D U MM E M O R A N D U M
To:To: Arjun Bruno, National Party ChairmanArjun Bruno, National Party Chairman
From:From: Arlene Marcus, State Party ChairwomanArlene Marcus, State Party Chairwoman
Subject:Subject: Supporting a National PrimarySupporting a National Primary
In the past few election cycles, our state’s role in the partyIn the past few election cycles, our state’s role in the party
nomination for president virtually has disappeared with anomination for president virtually has disappeared with a
May primary date. Several states have leapfrogged aheadMay primary date. Several states have leapfrogged ahead
of us, and party leaders have indicated that they do notof us, and party leaders have indicated that they do not
want any more states to move up their primary date. Thewant any more states to move up their primary date. The
national party needs to find a way to ensure that all states,national party needs to find a way to ensure that all states,
large and small, have a real voice in nominating alarge and small, have a real voice in nominating a
presidential candidate.presidential candidate.
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
WHAT WOULD YOU DO?WHAT WOULD YOU DO?
28. Arguments for:Arguments for:
1. A single national primary permits equal participation by all states1. A single national primary permits equal participation by all states
and presents a fair compromise with the increased number ofand presents a fair compromise with the increased number of
delegates that larger states send to the national conventions,delegates that larger states send to the national conventions,
much like the compromises during the original constitutionalmuch like the compromises during the original constitutional
debates.debates.
2. The nominating process needs to be less costly, particularly when2. The nominating process needs to be less costly, particularly when
presidential candidates realistically need to raise $100 million apresidential candidates realistically need to raise $100 million a
year before the general election to be competitive for theyear before the general election to be competitive for the
nomination. Holding all primaries and caucuses on a single daynomination. Holding all primaries and caucuses on a single day
will reduce overall election expenses significantly.will reduce overall election expenses significantly.
3. If the American electorate knows presidential nominations will be3. If the American electorate knows presidential nominations will be
decided by each party on one day, then they will be more likely todecided by each party on one day, then they will be more likely to
vote, a significant factor for elections in which historically, fewervote, a significant factor for elections in which historically, fewer
than 20 percent of eligible voters typically participate.than 20 percent of eligible voters typically participate.
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
WHAT WOULD YOU DO?WHAT WOULD YOU DO?
29. Arguments against:Arguments against:
1. Each state decides in conjunction with the national party when its1. Each state decides in conjunction with the national party when its
primary or caucus will take place, and the federal system ofprimary or caucus will take place, and the federal system of
government designed by the Framers did not guarantee that allgovernment designed by the Framers did not guarantee that all
states would be treated equally at all times.states would be treated equally at all times.
2. A national primary would favor candidates with high name2. A national primary would favor candidates with high name
recognition and funding to further that recognition and wouldrecognition and funding to further that recognition and would
severely disadvantage lesser known candidates within the party.severely disadvantage lesser known candidates within the party.
3. Even though the general election takes place on one day, voter3. Even though the general election takes place on one day, voter
turnout in the United States still is lower than in other advancedturnout in the United States still is lower than in other advanced
industrialized democracies, which suggests that other factorsindustrialized democracies, which suggests that other factors
influence who participates.influence who participates.
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
WHAT WOULD YOU DO?WHAT WOULD YOU DO?
30. Your decision:Your decision:
Support National Primary?Support National Primary?
Oppose National Primary?Oppose National Primary?
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
WHAT WOULD YOU DO?WHAT WOULD YOU DO?
Notes de l'éditeur Replace with jpeg, p. 225
Replace with jpeg, p. 251
The figures for 1980, 1984, 1988, and 1996 fail to add up to 100 percent because of missing data.
Notes: (1) Each dot represents a presidential election, showing the popular vote received by the incumbent president’s party. (2) 1992 data do not include votes for independent candidate H. Ross Perot. (3) 2004 value on RDI is projection from data available in December 2004.