1. Narrative Theory Notes
Narrativetheory
Narrativeis defined as “a chain of events in a cause-effectrelationship
occurring in time” (Bordwell& Thompson).
Narrativeis ‘a way of organising spatial and temporal events into a
cause-effectchain of events with a beginning, a middle, and end that
embodies a judgement about the nature of events’cbg (Brannigan).
Narrativetheory analyses the way in which media texts communicate
meaning about events.
Narrativetheory can be applied to rangeof different media including
film, TV. Photographs, and magazines.
Narrativeanalysis of internet based media is more problematic, though
may still be relevant. For example, you could consider how someone’s
Facebook profile creates a narrativeabout their life.
Edward Branigan (1992)
Branigan argues that narrativeis ‘a way of organising spatial and
temporal data into a cause-effectchain of events with a beginning, a
middle and end that embodies a judgement about the nature of events.’
Vladimir Propp (1928)
Propp was a Russian theoristwho suggests thatthere are a limited
number of character types that sharea function.
When an audience reads a media text it deploys its knowledgeof these
character types in order to decode the meaning of the text.
1. The villain.
2. The hero, or character who seeks something.
3. The donor, who provides an object with some magic property.
4. The helper, who aids the hero.
5. The princess, reward for thehero, and objectof the villain’s schemes
(can be male).
6. Her father, who rewards thehero.
7. The dispatcher, who sends the hero on his way.
8. The false hero, the character who also lays claim to the princess but is
unsuitable and causes complications.
2. Tzvetan Todorov (1969)
Roland Barthes (1960s)
Roland Barthes' narrativetheory claims that a narrativecan be broken
down into five codes or sets of rules to help the reader make senseof it.
He emphasises the active role of readers in creating meaning, and their
‘culturally formed expectations’.
The 5 codes:
1. Action code which refers to the events taking place through action e.g. a
fight or a chase.
2. Referential code which refers to the information and explanation.
3. Semantic code which refers to the characters and characterisation.
4. Enigma code which is a narrativedevice that teases the audience by
presenting a puzzleor riddle to be solved. Works to delay the story’s
ending pleasurably.
5. Symbolic code which refers to the connotations of signs.
Claude Levi-Strauss (1972)
Social Anthropologist.
Studied myths of tribal cultures.
Examined how stories unconsciously reflectthe values, beliefs and
myths of a culture.
These are usually expressed in the form of binary oppositions.
3. His research has been adapted by theorists to reveal underlying themes
and symbolic oppositions in texts.
A conflict between two qualities or terms.
For example in fairy tales:
The Good The Bad
Christian (kings queens etc) pagan (witches)
domestic savage
weak princesses strong wrong doers
safecastles dark wilderness forests
pretty ugly
innocent devious
Allan Cameron: Modular Narratives (2008)
Anachronic:
Modified flashbacks/flashforwards.
No clear dominance between narrative threads.
Forking-Path:
Alternative versions of the story.
Outcomes that might resultfrom slight changes.
Episodic:
Collection of stories joined by a common theme.
Split Screen:
Spatial rather than temporal lines.
Postmodern Narratives
Some theorists suggestthat postmodern narratives aredifferent from
previous narrativestructures.
Characteristics of postmodern narratives include:
1. Irony, playfulness, and black humour.
2. Intertextuality.
3. Pastiche.
4. Metanarratives.
4. 5. Extreme self-reflexivity/self-awareness.
6. Temporal distortion.
7. Hyperreality.
NarrativeAnalysis
Narrativeanalysis involves considering how a range of elements
(including mise-en-scene, editing, camerawork, sound, as wellas events)
create meaning for the audience.
Itis usefulfor you to be awareof narrativetheory as it may help inform
the construction of your shortfilm.
Genre
‘Genre’ is a critical tool that helps us study texts and audience responses
to texts by dividing them into categories based on common elements.
“The word ‘genre’ means ‘type’ or ‘category’. To study a film as a genre
involves treating it, not as a unique entity, but as a member of a general
category, as a certain type of film. The aim…is therefore to classify, or
organise, a large number of films into a small number of groups.”
Genre helps both audiences and institutions to make decisions about
what they wantto see and what they want to make to supply that
demand.
If werecognise the genre of a text it enables us to feel at home and we
gain enjoymentfrom “spotting the conventions” (repetition) and making
comparisons with other films of the samegenre.
However if a text deviates from the conventions it can confuseus, but at
the sametime we enjoy seeing the rules broken, providing that the film-
maker doesn’t go too far.
Genre offers audiences a structureor framework enabling us to feel
securein our knowledge.
Audiences like the anticipation of waiting for the predictable features
and getting involved in a text.
Audiences can influence genres by reviving them.
We are more advanced than audiences of the past simply because we’ve
seen more films than anyone in the history of the media, so we expect
genres to be played with.
5. Buckingham(1993)
Traditionally, genres (particularly literary genres) tended to be regarded
as fixed forms, butcontemporary theory emphasises that both their
forms and functions are dynamic.
David Buckinghamargues that 'genre is not... simply "given" by the
culture: rather, it is in a constant process of negotiation and change'
Changes in genre reflects changes in society and our values.
Rick Altman (1999)
Film Theorist Altman argues that “there is no such thing as “pure” genre
anymore. Genre is progressive, in that it will always change.”
He says that generic conventions are very much a thing of the past. His
theory suggests that audiences, in general havebecome tired of the
same formula and need more to keep them entertained and to create
appeal.
He says that genre is surviving dueto “hybridisation – or genres
“borrowing” conventions from oneanother and thus being much more
difficult to categorise.”
Tom Ryall 1978
Ryall argues that genres are recognisablethrough the repeated use of
generic codes and conventions, as how we as the audience know a
horror film is a horror film.
He suggests that the types of conventions found in genres might be
grouped within the following categories:
-Iconographies: (symbolic forms associated with the genre)
-Narrative: (structure, open/closed)
-Representations: (characters/stereotypes)
-Ideologies (beliefs and ideas of the ‘ideal’ concept, themes)
The Strengths of Genre Theory
The main strength of genre theory is that everybody uses it and understands it:
– Media experts useit to study media texts.
- The media industry uses it to develop and market texts.
6. - Audiences use it to decide whattexts to consume.
The potential for the same concept to be understood by producers,
audiences and scholars makes genre a usefulcritical tool.
Its accessibility as a concept also means that it can be applied across a
wide range of texts.
Problems with Genre theory
Genre is a great way of helping define different methods of
communicating to the audience and provides boundaries and guidelines
as well as shorthand for both producers, institutions and audiences in
terms of creating and consuming media.
However genres can get tired and be stifling for creators who want to
experiment outside the rigid boxes set out for them. Yet without a
‘genre’ to conformto they would find hard to find funding or to sell their
productto audiences who require genre to understand and choosetheir
media.
By trying to pigeon hole everything into genre specific boxes many fail to
see the art behind the product. Institutions areless enthused to take
risks and so the cycle will continue as each side of the process will
continue to haveexpectations which both sides will continue to provide
for the other in order to sell the products.
We need to be awareof genre theory and conventions in order to make
surethe audience understand our shortfilms.