SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  38
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Business in the United States
Who Owns it and How Much Tax They Pay
Michael Cooper, US Treasury Department
John McClelland, US Treasury Department
James Pearce, US Treasury Department
Rich Prisinzano, US Treasury Department
Joseph Sullivan, US Treasury Department
Danny Yagan, UC Berkeley and NBER
Owen Zidar, Chicago Booth and NBER
Eric Zwick, Chicago Booth and NBER
TPE, September 24th, 2015
*The views expressed here are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect those of the
Treasury Department.
The Rise of Pass-Throughs
0255075100
PercentageofTotalNetBusinessIncome
1980 1990 2000 2010
Year
Sole Proprietorships
Partnerships
S Corporations
C Corporations
2 / 30
Pass-Throughs and Top-1% Income Share
510152025
Shareofincomeearnedbytop1%(%)
1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Year
Actual
Pass−through income share fixed at 1980 level
10 p.p.
increase
since 1980 4.4 p.p. increase
via salaries and other
capital income
5.6 p.p. increase
via pass-through
business income
3 / 30
This Paper
We use administrative tax data from the U.S. in 2011 to:
1. Identify business owners
2. Estimate how much tax they pay
4 / 30
This Paper
We use administrative tax data from the U.S. in 2011 to:
1. Identify business owners
2. Estimate how much tax they pay
We find:
1. Pass-through business income is especially concentrated
2. Average federal income tax rate on pass-throughs is 19%
3. 30% of income earned by partnerships cannot be
unambiguously traced to an identifiable, ultimate owner
4 / 30
Roadmap
1. Linking businesses to their owners
2. Who owns businesses in the pass-through sector?
3. Method for estimating average tax rates
4. Average tax rates on business income
5 / 30
1. Linking Businesses to Their Owners
5 / 30
Partnerships file a business inc. tax return. . .
6 / 30
which lists allocations only by partner
type. . .
7 / 30
. . . but are reflected in K-1s
(issued per partner)
8 / 30
Linking Partnerships to Partners
Data Challenge: Partners can be one of many entity types, and
different kinds of returns are processed by different systems.
Our Procedure: Link K-1s to partnership returns by merging on
the Document Locator Number (linking 25.5m K-1s to 3.6m
partnerships)
High coverage:
Match 97.7% of partnerships to a K1
Match 98.2% of aggregate ordinary business income
9 / 30
Partnerships with Partnership Partners
Partnerships can be owned by other partnerships
Not problematic for sector-wide analyses
Problematic for industry breakdowns and possibly audits
10 / 30
Partnerships with Partnership Partners
Partnerships can be owned by other partnerships
Not problematic for sector-wide analyses
Problematic for industry breakdowns and possibly audits
10 / 30
Partnerships with Partnership Partners
Partnerships can be owned by other partnerships
Not problematic for sector-wide analyses
Problematic for industry breakdowns and possibly audits
10 / 30
Partnerships with Partnership Partners
Partnerships can be owned by other partnerships
Not problematic for sector-wide analyses
Problematic for industry breakdowns and possibly audits
Use recursive algorithm to trace income through tiers until
only “nontransparent” partnerships remain
10 / 30
Classifying Partners
Partner Type Form Filed
Individual 1040
C- and other corporations 1120, 1120j ∀ j ∈ {F,PC,L,RIC,REIT,H,C,POL,ND,SF,FSC}
S-corporations 1120S
Tax-exempt 990, 990j ∀ j ∈ {T,R,PF,ZR,C}
Estate/trust 1041
Foreign person/entity 1042, 1042S, 8805, 8288A
Partnerships 1065, 1065B, 1066
Unidentified EIN Taxpayer identifier classifiable as EIN, but tax form unknown
Unidentified TIN type Taxpayer identifier not classifiable
11 / 30
Linking Other Business Types to their Owners
1. S-Corporations
Owners must not be other business entities
Link 1120S K1s to owner’s Form 1040
2. Sole Proprietorships
Income reported directly on Form 1040
3. C-Corporations
Owners are not identifiable
Use dividend income from Form 1040
12 / 30
2. Who Owns Businesses?
12 / 30
Number of K1s by Type of Partner
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.1
2.2
5.0
5.3
5.6
7.4
7.9
73.9
78.3
0 20 40 60 80
Number of K1s by Type of Partner (% of Total)
C- and other corporations
Tax-exempt
S-corporations
Foreign person/entity
Unidentified EIN
Estate/trust
Partnerships
Unidentified TIN type
Individuals
Without Partnership Partners With Partnership Partners
13 / 30
Income Shares by Type of Partner
3.4
4.6
4.1
5.5
5.2
7.1
5.3
7.2
6.8
9.3
7.7
10.5
9.6
13.0
26.3
31.5
42.7
0 10 20 30 40
Partnership Income by Type of Partner (% of Total)
S-corporations
Tax-exempt
Unidentified EIN
Estate/trust
Foreign person/entity
C- and other corporations
Unidentified TIN type
Partnerships
Individuals
Without Partnership Partners With Partnership Partners
14 / 30
Partnership Income Shares by Industry
3.5
4.1
4.6
7.0
10.8
70.0
0 20 40 60 80
Partnership Income by Partnership Industry (% of Total)
Mining, Oil & Gas
Health Care
Manufacturing
Other
Professional Services
Finance & Holding Cos
Note: “Finance & Holding Cos” includes real estate and rental partnerships (≈ 3.1% of total)
15 / 30
Business Participation Rates by AGI Pctile
020406080
Sharewithpositiveincome(%)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
AGI percentile
Sole proprietorship income
C−corporation income
S−corporation income
Partnership income
16 / 30
Business Income Shares by AGI Pctile
020406080
Shareofincometype(%)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
AGI percentile
Sole proprietorship income
C−corporation income
S−corporation income
Partnership income
17 / 30
Partnership Income Shares by AGI Pctile
Three Sample Industries
010203040
Shareofpartnershipincome(%)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
AGI percentile
Accommodation and Food Service (NAICS 72)
Professional Services (NAICS 54)
Finance, Holding Companies (NAICS 52, 55, and 531) 18 / 30
3. Method for Estimating Average Tax Rates
18 / 30
Tax Rates on Income Distributed to Partners
Calculated Rates
Tik =
TOTA
ik = TAXik
Yik
if k files form ∈ {1040, 1120, 1120S}
TAssigned
ik otherwise
where
Tik ≡ tax rate on income type i to partner k from all
partnerships p
i ≡ income type in {capital gains, dividends, ordinary business
income, interest}
Yik ≡ sum of payment of income type i to partner k from all
partnerships
TAXik ≡ change in tax liability from the OTA tax calculator
19 / 30
Tax Rates on Income Distributed to Partners
Assigned Rates
TAssigned
ik =



TOTA
i,1040 if form ∈ {1120-RIC,1120-REIT,1066,1041}
TOTA
i,1120 if form ∈ {1120j}∀ j ∈ {F,PC,L,H,C,POL,ND,SF,FSC}
.025 if form ∈ {8805,1042S,8288A,1042}
0 if form ∈ {990,990j}∀ j ∈ {T,R,PF,ZR,C}
.025+TOTA
i,1120
2 if k has unidentified EIN or tin type
where
form is the tax form partner k files
TOTA
i,1040 is the tax rate for individuals from the OTA tax
calculator for income type i
TOTA
i,1120 is the tax rate for C-corporations
20 / 30
Aggregating Tax Rates
Partnership Rates
Tp = i∈I k∈K TikYikp
Yp
where
the numerator is the sum of tax liabilities over income types i
and partners k associated with payments from partnership p
the denominator is the total payments from partnership p
Partnership Sector Rate
T =
i∈I k∈K p∈P TikYikp
Y
where
the numerator is the sum of tax liabilities from payments from
partnerships
the denominator is the total payments from all partnerships
21 / 30
Tax Rates on Other Business Types
1. S-Corporations
TAXS ≡ Actual tax minus hypothetical tax with zero 1120S
income
Tax rate is TAXS divided by actual 1120S income
2. Sole Proprietorships
Same method as S-Corporations
3. C-Corporations
TAXC1 ≡ Actual taxes paid
First layer is TAXC1 divided by taxable income
TAXC2 ≡ Estimate from Poterba (2004) for dividend+cap
gains tax times income net of first layer of tax
Final rate combines first and second layer of tax
22 / 30
4. Average Tax Rates on Business Income
22 / 30
Tax Rate by Entity Type
13.6
15.9
25.0
22.7
31.6
0102030
Taxrate(%)
Sole Proprietorships Partnerships S-corps C-corps
Average Tax Rate Payout Tax Rate
23 / 30
Tax Rates on Partnership Income
By Type of Partner
0.0
2.5
11.7
12.6
15.9
16.5
20.1
21.0
22.0
0 5 10 15 20
Average Tax Rate on Partnership Income (%)
Tax-exempt
Foreign person/entity
Unidentified TIN type
Unidentified EIN
Total Excluding Partnerships
Estate/trust
C- and other corporations
Individuals
S-corporations
24 / 30
Partnership Income Type Distribution
By Type of Partner
0 20 40 60 80 100
Composition of Partnership Income (%)
Tax-exempt
Foreign person/entity
Unidentified TIN type
Unidentified EIN
Total Excluding Partnerships
Estate/trust
C- and other corporations
Individuals
S-corporations
Ordinary Income Interest Capital Gains Dividends
25 / 30
Tax Rates on Partnership Income
By Industry
14.7
16.6
18.5
22.1
22.3
22.4
0 5 10 15 20 25
Tax Rate by Partnership Industry
Finance & Holding Cos
Manufacturing
Mining, Oil & Gas
Other
Health Care
Professional Services
Note: “Finance & Holding Cos” includes real estate and rental partnerships (≈ 3.1% of total)
26 / 30
Partnership Income Type Distribution
By Industry
0 20 40 60 80 100
Composition of Partnership Income (%)
Finance & Holding Cos
Manufacturing
Mining, Oil & Gas
Other
Health Care
Professional Services
Ordinary Income Interest Capital Gains Dividends
Note: “Finance & Holding Cos” includes real estate and rental partnerships (≈ 3.1% of total)
27 / 30
Partnership Ownership is Opaque
1. 20% of income earned by unclassifiable partners
Use income type allocations to “guess” applicable rate
2. Not all partnership income can be uniquely linked to an
originating partnership
Use recursive algorithm to trace income through tiers until
only “nontransparent” partnerships remain
28 / 30
Partnership Ownership is Opaque
Some Facts about Nontransparent Partnerships
1. Algorithm reaches fixed point after 22 steps
2. 22,417 nontransparent partnerships remain (out of 3.6M)
3. Unsolved partnerships issue 9.6M K1s (out of 25.5M)
4. $100B of taxable income in this group (out of $671B)
5. Tax paid on this income is 8.8% (compared to 17.1% for
remaining $571B)
29 / 30
Conclusion
1. The Rise of Pass-throughs: U.S. business activity has
migrated from corporations to pass-throughs.
2. Who Owns Them?
69% of pass-through income earned by individuals accrues to
the top-1%
The union of income flowing (1) to unclassifiable partners and
(2) through nontransparent partnerships is $200B, or 30% of
income earned in the partnership sector overall.
3. How Much Tax Do They Pay? The average federal income
tax rate on pass-through business income in 2011 is 19%.
4. Implication: With pass-through activity at 1980 levels:
Average rate in 2011 would have been 28% (instead of 24%)
Tax revenue would have been at least $100B higher
30 / 30

Contenu connexe

Tendances

TAG Luncheon: 2012 Tax Update
TAG Luncheon: 2012 Tax UpdateTAG Luncheon: 2012 Tax Update
TAG Luncheon: 2012 Tax Update
Meg Weber
 
Capitol Hill Campus: Tax Reform: Simplification is Good Policy
Capitol Hill Campus: Tax Reform: Simplification is Good PolicyCapitol Hill Campus: Tax Reform: Simplification is Good Policy
Capitol Hill Campus: Tax Reform: Simplification is Good Policy
Mercatus Center
 
Chapter 13
Chapter 13Chapter 13
Chapter 13
dphil002
 

Tendances (17)

Local Option Taxes: Promises and Limitations
Local Option Taxes: Promises and LimitationsLocal Option Taxes: Promises and Limitations
Local Option Taxes: Promises and Limitations
 
Business Taxes | Venable | Doing Business 2.0
Business Taxes | Venable | Doing Business 2.0Business Taxes | Venable | Doing Business 2.0
Business Taxes | Venable | Doing Business 2.0
 
1 q11 erf_supplement_final
1 q11 erf_supplement_final1 q11 erf_supplement_final
1 q11 erf_supplement_final
 
2 q09 erf_supplement_final
2 q09 erf_supplement_final2 q09 erf_supplement_final
2 q09 erf_supplement_final
 
Wells Fargo Bank Statement
Wells Fargo Bank StatementWells Fargo Bank Statement
Wells Fargo Bank Statement
 
2 q08erf supplement
2 q08erf supplement2 q08erf supplement
2 q08erf supplement
 
3 q09 erf_supplement_final
3 q09 erf_supplement_final3 q09 erf_supplement_final
3 q09 erf_supplement_final
 
Fiduciary Protection: Is Your Retirement Plan Ready for a DOL or IRS Audit?
Fiduciary Protection: Is Your Retirement Plan Ready for a DOL or IRS Audit?Fiduciary Protection: Is Your Retirement Plan Ready for a DOL or IRS Audit?
Fiduciary Protection: Is Your Retirement Plan Ready for a DOL or IRS Audit?
 
Taxes and Business Owners
Taxes and Business OwnersTaxes and Business Owners
Taxes and Business Owners
 
January 2017 digital realty company overview
January 2017 digital realty company overviewJanuary 2017 digital realty company overview
January 2017 digital realty company overview
 
TAG Luncheon: 2012 Tax Update
TAG Luncheon: 2012 Tax UpdateTAG Luncheon: 2012 Tax Update
TAG Luncheon: 2012 Tax Update
 
Taxable social security_benefits_2021
Taxable social security_benefits_2021Taxable social security_benefits_2021
Taxable social security_benefits_2021
 
19.6.2019, Παρουσίαση Θ. Πελαγίδη στο Συνέδριο "Η Ελλάδα Μετά ΙΙΙ: Η ανασύστα...
19.6.2019, Παρουσίαση Θ. Πελαγίδη στο Συνέδριο "Η Ελλάδα Μετά ΙΙΙ: Η ανασύστα...19.6.2019, Παρουσίαση Θ. Πελαγίδη στο Συνέδριο "Η Ελλάδα Μετά ΙΙΙ: Η ανασύστα...
19.6.2019, Παρουσίαση Θ. Πελαγίδη στο Συνέδριο "Η Ελλάδα Μετά ΙΙΙ: Η ανασύστα...
 
2 q11 erf_supplement_final
2 q11 erf_supplement_final2 q11 erf_supplement_final
2 q11 erf_supplement_final
 
Capitol Hill Campus: Tax Reform: Simplification is Good Policy
Capitol Hill Campus: Tax Reform: Simplification is Good PolicyCapitol Hill Campus: Tax Reform: Simplification is Good Policy
Capitol Hill Campus: Tax Reform: Simplification is Good Policy
 
Chapter 13
Chapter 13Chapter 13
Chapter 13
 
Dr. Matthew Knittel: Implications of Economic Demographic Trends for State an...
Dr. Matthew Knittel: Implications of Economic Demographic Trends for State an...Dr. Matthew Knittel: Implications of Economic Demographic Trends for State an...
Dr. Matthew Knittel: Implications of Economic Demographic Trends for State an...
 

En vedette

The Distributional E ffects of U.S. Clean Energy Tax Credits
The Distributional Effects of U.S. Clean Energy Tax CreditsThe Distributional Effects of U.S. Clean Energy Tax Credits
The Distributional E ffects of U.S. Clean Energy Tax Credits
NBER
 
Redistribution through Minimum Wage Regulation: An Analysis of Program Linkag...
Redistribution through Minimum Wage Regulation: An Analysis of Program Linkag...Redistribution through Minimum Wage Regulation: An Analysis of Program Linkag...
Redistribution through Minimum Wage Regulation: An Analysis of Program Linkag...
NBER
 
Amplitude modulation
Amplitude modulationAmplitude modulation
Amplitude modulation
dude_deepak
 
Cos branding talking points notes
Cos branding talking points notesCos branding talking points notes
Cos branding talking points notes
derekashtonmurray
 

En vedette (10)

SHARE Progress Report, Fall Meeting 2014
SHARE Progress Report, Fall Meeting 2014SHARE Progress Report, Fall Meeting 2014
SHARE Progress Report, Fall Meeting 2014
 
Middle Schools and CTE
Middle Schools and CTEMiddle Schools and CTE
Middle Schools and CTE
 
The Distributional E ffects of U.S. Clean Energy Tax Credits
The Distributional Effects of U.S. Clean Energy Tax CreditsThe Distributional Effects of U.S. Clean Energy Tax Credits
The Distributional E ffects of U.S. Clean Energy Tax Credits
 
Redistribution through Minimum Wage Regulation: An Analysis of Program Linkag...
Redistribution through Minimum Wage Regulation: An Analysis of Program Linkag...Redistribution through Minimum Wage Regulation: An Analysis of Program Linkag...
Redistribution through Minimum Wage Regulation: An Analysis of Program Linkag...
 
Amplitude modulation
Amplitude modulationAmplitude modulation
Amplitude modulation
 
Big Data Analysis
Big Data AnalysisBig Data Analysis
Big Data Analysis
 
PPT on Trigonometric Functions. Class 11
PPT on Trigonometric Functions. Class 11PPT on Trigonometric Functions. Class 11
PPT on Trigonometric Functions. Class 11
 
Introduction to trigonometry 
Introduction to trigonometry      Introduction to trigonometry      
Introduction to trigonometry 
 
Fourier series 1
Fourier series 1Fourier series 1
Fourier series 1
 
Cos branding talking points notes
Cos branding talking points notesCos branding talking points notes
Cos branding talking points notes
 

Similaire à Business in the United States Who Owns it and How Much Tax They Pay

TRC Investor Presentations Q1 2014
TRC Investor Presentations Q1 2014TRC Investor Presentations Q1 2014
TRC Investor Presentations Q1 2014
trcsolutions
 
Chapter 2 Part 1
Chapter 2 Part 1Chapter 2 Part 1
Chapter 2 Part 1
guest5353ab
 
Trc investor presentation q1 2014 final
Trc investor presentation q1 2014 finalTrc investor presentation q1 2014 final
Trc investor presentation q1 2014 final
trcsolutions
 
Trc q4 2015 earnings slides final
Trc q4 2015 earnings slides finalTrc q4 2015 earnings slides final
Trc q4 2015 earnings slides final
trcsolutions
 
Certain Cash Contributions for Typhoon Haiyan Relief Efforts .docx
Certain Cash Contributions for Typhoon Haiyan Relief Efforts .docxCertain Cash Contributions for Typhoon Haiyan Relief Efforts .docx
Certain Cash Contributions for Typhoon Haiyan Relief Efforts .docx
cravennichole326
 

Similaire à Business in the United States Who Owns it and How Much Tax They Pay (20)

Tax Assessment Procedure
Tax  Assessment Procedure Tax  Assessment Procedure
Tax Assessment Procedure
 
Snr income tax compliance hand book
Snr income tax compliance hand bookSnr income tax compliance hand book
Snr income tax compliance hand book
 
Corporate tax
Corporate taxCorporate tax
Corporate tax
 
Trc q1-2015-earnings-slides-final v001-g61n61
Trc q1-2015-earnings-slides-final v001-g61n61Trc q1-2015-earnings-slides-final v001-g61n61
Trc q1-2015-earnings-slides-final v001-g61n61
 
Framework for Reforms in UK Tax System
Framework for Reforms in UK Tax SystemFramework for Reforms in UK Tax System
Framework for Reforms in UK Tax System
 
TRC Investor Presentations Q1 2014
TRC Investor Presentations Q1 2014TRC Investor Presentations Q1 2014
TRC Investor Presentations Q1 2014
 
Trc q3 2015 earnings slides final
Trc q3 2015 earnings slides finalTrc q3 2015 earnings slides final
Trc q3 2015 earnings slides final
 
05/07/2013 - 1Q13 Earnings Conference Call
05/07/2013 - 1Q13 Earnings Conference Call05/07/2013 - 1Q13 Earnings Conference Call
05/07/2013 - 1Q13 Earnings Conference Call
 
Chapter 2 Part 1
Chapter 2 Part 1Chapter 2 Part 1
Chapter 2 Part 1
 
Capital structure2
Capital structure2Capital structure2
Capital structure2
 
Quick facts from tax stats 2012-13
Quick facts from tax stats 2012-13 Quick facts from tax stats 2012-13
Quick facts from tax stats 2012-13
 
Trc investor presentation q1 2014 final
Trc investor presentation q1 2014 finalTrc investor presentation q1 2014 final
Trc investor presentation q1 2014 final
 
Trc q1 2016 earnings slides final
Trc q1 2016 earnings slides finalTrc q1 2016 earnings slides final
Trc q1 2016 earnings slides final
 
PWC Doing-business-in-the-us-2015
PWC Doing-business-in-the-us-2015PWC Doing-business-in-the-us-2015
PWC Doing-business-in-the-us-2015
 
1Q 2015 Earnings Presentation
1Q 2015 Earnings Presentation1Q 2015 Earnings Presentation
1Q 2015 Earnings Presentation
 
Trc q4 2015 earnings slides final
Trc q4 2015 earnings slides finalTrc q4 2015 earnings slides final
Trc q4 2015 earnings slides final
 
Cc 4 t15 eng
Cc 4 t15 engCc 4 t15 eng
Cc 4 t15 eng
 
Certain Cash Contributions for Typhoon Haiyan Relief Efforts .docx
Certain Cash Contributions for Typhoon Haiyan Relief Efforts .docxCertain Cash Contributions for Typhoon Haiyan Relief Efforts .docx
Certain Cash Contributions for Typhoon Haiyan Relief Efforts .docx
 
HLEG thematic workshop on Measuring Inequalities of Income and Wealth, Charlo...
HLEG thematic workshop on Measuring Inequalities of Income and Wealth, Charlo...HLEG thematic workshop on Measuring Inequalities of Income and Wealth, Charlo...
HLEG thematic workshop on Measuring Inequalities of Income and Wealth, Charlo...
 
Tax recknor 2015-16
Tax recknor 2015-16Tax recknor 2015-16
Tax recknor 2015-16
 

Plus de NBER

FISCAL STIMULUS IN ECONOMIC UNIONS: WHAT ROLE FOR STATES
FISCAL STIMULUS IN ECONOMIC UNIONS: WHAT ROLE FOR STATESFISCAL STIMULUS IN ECONOMIC UNIONS: WHAT ROLE FOR STATES
FISCAL STIMULUS IN ECONOMIC UNIONS: WHAT ROLE FOR STATES
NBER
 
Jackson nber-slides2014 lecture3
Jackson nber-slides2014 lecture3Jackson nber-slides2014 lecture3
Jackson nber-slides2014 lecture3
NBER
 
Acemoglu lecture2
Acemoglu lecture2Acemoglu lecture2
Acemoglu lecture2
NBER
 
Acemoglu lecture4
Acemoglu lecture4Acemoglu lecture4
Acemoglu lecture4
NBER
 

Plus de NBER (20)

FISCAL STIMULUS IN ECONOMIC UNIONS: WHAT ROLE FOR STATES
FISCAL STIMULUS IN ECONOMIC UNIONS: WHAT ROLE FOR STATESFISCAL STIMULUS IN ECONOMIC UNIONS: WHAT ROLE FOR STATES
FISCAL STIMULUS IN ECONOMIC UNIONS: WHAT ROLE FOR STATES
 
Nbe rtopicsandrecomvlecture1
Nbe rtopicsandrecomvlecture1Nbe rtopicsandrecomvlecture1
Nbe rtopicsandrecomvlecture1
 
Nbe rcausalpredictionv111 lecture2
Nbe rcausalpredictionv111 lecture2Nbe rcausalpredictionv111 lecture2
Nbe rcausalpredictionv111 lecture2
 
Nber slides11 lecture2
Nber slides11 lecture2Nber slides11 lecture2
Nber slides11 lecture2
 
Recommenders, Topics, and Text
Recommenders, Topics, and TextRecommenders, Topics, and Text
Recommenders, Topics, and Text
 
Machine Learning and Causal Inference
Machine Learning and Causal InferenceMachine Learning and Causal Inference
Machine Learning and Causal Inference
 
Introduction to Supervised ML Concepts and Algorithms
Introduction to Supervised ML Concepts and AlgorithmsIntroduction to Supervised ML Concepts and Algorithms
Introduction to Supervised ML Concepts and Algorithms
 
Jackson nber-slides2014 lecture3
Jackson nber-slides2014 lecture3Jackson nber-slides2014 lecture3
Jackson nber-slides2014 lecture3
 
Jackson nber-slides2014 lecture1
Jackson nber-slides2014 lecture1Jackson nber-slides2014 lecture1
Jackson nber-slides2014 lecture1
 
Acemoglu lecture2
Acemoglu lecture2Acemoglu lecture2
Acemoglu lecture2
 
Acemoglu lecture4
Acemoglu lecture4Acemoglu lecture4
Acemoglu lecture4
 
The NBER Working Paper Series at 20,000 - Joshua Gans
The NBER Working Paper Series at 20,000 - Joshua GansThe NBER Working Paper Series at 20,000 - Joshua Gans
The NBER Working Paper Series at 20,000 - Joshua Gans
 
The NBER Working Paper Series at 20,000 - Claudia Goldin
The NBER Working Paper Series at 20,000 - Claudia GoldinThe NBER Working Paper Series at 20,000 - Claudia Goldin
The NBER Working Paper Series at 20,000 - Claudia Goldin
 
The NBER Working Paper Series at 20,000 - James Poterba
The NBER Working Paper Series at 20,000 - James PoterbaThe NBER Working Paper Series at 20,000 - James Poterba
The NBER Working Paper Series at 20,000 - James Poterba
 
The NBER Working Paper Series at 20,000 - Scott Stern
The NBER Working Paper Series at 20,000 - Scott SternThe NBER Working Paper Series at 20,000 - Scott Stern
The NBER Working Paper Series at 20,000 - Scott Stern
 
The NBER Working Paper Series at 20,000 - Glenn Ellison
The NBER Working Paper Series at 20,000 - Glenn EllisonThe NBER Working Paper Series at 20,000 - Glenn Ellison
The NBER Working Paper Series at 20,000 - Glenn Ellison
 
L3 1b
L3 1bL3 1b
L3 1b
 
Econometrics of High-Dimensional Sparse Models
Econometrics of High-Dimensional Sparse ModelsEconometrics of High-Dimensional Sparse Models
Econometrics of High-Dimensional Sparse Models
 
Nuts and bolts
Nuts and boltsNuts and bolts
Nuts and bolts
 
High-Dimensional Methods: Examples for Inference on Structural Effects
High-Dimensional Methods: Examples for Inference on Structural EffectsHigh-Dimensional Methods: Examples for Inference on Structural Effects
High-Dimensional Methods: Examples for Inference on Structural Effects
 

Dernier

Call Girls in Sarita Vihar Delhi Just Call 👉👉9873777170 Independent Female ...
Call Girls in  Sarita Vihar Delhi Just Call 👉👉9873777170  Independent Female ...Call Girls in  Sarita Vihar Delhi Just Call 👉👉9873777170  Independent Female ...
Call Girls in Sarita Vihar Delhi Just Call 👉👉9873777170 Independent Female ...
adilkhan87451
 
VIP Call Girls Agra 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Agra 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 BookingVIP Call Girls Agra 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Agra 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
dharasingh5698
 

Dernier (20)

Pimpri Chinchwad ( Call Girls ) Pune 6297143586 Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi R...
Pimpri Chinchwad ( Call Girls ) Pune  6297143586  Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi R...Pimpri Chinchwad ( Call Girls ) Pune  6297143586  Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi R...
Pimpri Chinchwad ( Call Girls ) Pune 6297143586 Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi R...
 
2024: The FAR, Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 31
2024: The FAR, Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 312024: The FAR, Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 31
2024: The FAR, Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 31
 
World Press Freedom Day 2024; May 3rd - Poster
World Press Freedom Day 2024; May 3rd - PosterWorld Press Freedom Day 2024; May 3rd - Poster
World Press Freedom Day 2024; May 3rd - Poster
 
Coastal Protection Measures in Hulhumale'
Coastal Protection Measures in Hulhumale'Coastal Protection Measures in Hulhumale'
Coastal Protection Measures in Hulhumale'
 
Call Girls in Sarita Vihar Delhi Just Call 👉👉9873777170 Independent Female ...
Call Girls in  Sarita Vihar Delhi Just Call 👉👉9873777170  Independent Female ...Call Girls in  Sarita Vihar Delhi Just Call 👉👉9873777170  Independent Female ...
Call Girls in Sarita Vihar Delhi Just Call 👉👉9873777170 Independent Female ...
 
Election 2024 Presiding Duty Keypoints_01.pdf
Election 2024 Presiding Duty Keypoints_01.pdfElection 2024 Presiding Duty Keypoints_01.pdf
Election 2024 Presiding Duty Keypoints_01.pdf
 
VIP Model Call Girls Narhe ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to 25...
VIP Model Call Girls Narhe ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to 25...VIP Model Call Girls Narhe ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to 25...
VIP Model Call Girls Narhe ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to 25...
 
Call Girls Sangamwadi Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Booking
Call Girls Sangamwadi Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance BookingCall Girls Sangamwadi Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Booking
Call Girls Sangamwadi Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Booking
 
Call On 6297143586 Viman Nagar Call Girls In All Pune 24/7 Provide Call With...
Call On 6297143586  Viman Nagar Call Girls In All Pune 24/7 Provide Call With...Call On 6297143586  Viman Nagar Call Girls In All Pune 24/7 Provide Call With...
Call On 6297143586 Viman Nagar Call Girls In All Pune 24/7 Provide Call With...
 
AHMR volume 10 number 1 January-April 2024
AHMR volume 10 number 1 January-April 2024AHMR volume 10 number 1 January-April 2024
AHMR volume 10 number 1 January-April 2024
 
SMART BANGLADESH I PPTX I SLIDE IShovan Prita Paul.pptx
SMART BANGLADESH  I    PPTX   I    SLIDE   IShovan Prita Paul.pptxSMART BANGLADESH  I    PPTX   I    SLIDE   IShovan Prita Paul.pptx
SMART BANGLADESH I PPTX I SLIDE IShovan Prita Paul.pptx
 
VIP Call Girls Agra 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Agra 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 BookingVIP Call Girls Agra 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Agra 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
 
Call On 6297143586 Yerwada Call Girls In All Pune 24/7 Provide Call With Bes...
Call On 6297143586  Yerwada Call Girls In All Pune 24/7 Provide Call With Bes...Call On 6297143586  Yerwada Call Girls In All Pune 24/7 Provide Call With Bes...
Call On 6297143586 Yerwada Call Girls In All Pune 24/7 Provide Call With Bes...
 
Antisemitism Awareness Act: pénaliser la critique de l'Etat d'Israël
Antisemitism Awareness Act: pénaliser la critique de l'Etat d'IsraëlAntisemitism Awareness Act: pénaliser la critique de l'Etat d'Israël
Antisemitism Awareness Act: pénaliser la critique de l'Etat d'Israël
 
celebrity 💋 Nagpur Escorts Just Dail 8250092165 service available anytime 24 ...
celebrity 💋 Nagpur Escorts Just Dail 8250092165 service available anytime 24 ...celebrity 💋 Nagpur Escorts Just Dail 8250092165 service available anytime 24 ...
celebrity 💋 Nagpur Escorts Just Dail 8250092165 service available anytime 24 ...
 
celebrity 💋 Agra Escorts Just Dail 8250092165 service available anytime 24 hour
celebrity 💋 Agra Escorts Just Dail 8250092165 service available anytime 24 hourcelebrity 💋 Agra Escorts Just Dail 8250092165 service available anytime 24 hour
celebrity 💋 Agra Escorts Just Dail 8250092165 service available anytime 24 hour
 
VIP Model Call Girls Baramati ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to...
VIP Model Call Girls Baramati ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to...VIP Model Call Girls Baramati ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to...
VIP Model Call Girls Baramati ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to...
 
A Press for the Planet: Journalism in the face of the Environmental Crisis
A Press for the Planet: Journalism in the face of the Environmental CrisisA Press for the Planet: Journalism in the face of the Environmental Crisis
A Press for the Planet: Journalism in the face of the Environmental Crisis
 
Nanded City ? Russian Call Girls Pune - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 800573673...
Nanded City ? Russian Call Girls Pune - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 800573673...Nanded City ? Russian Call Girls Pune - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 800573673...
Nanded City ? Russian Call Girls Pune - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 800573673...
 
celebrity 💋 Patna Escorts Just Dail 8250092165 service available anytime 24 hour
celebrity 💋 Patna Escorts Just Dail 8250092165 service available anytime 24 hourcelebrity 💋 Patna Escorts Just Dail 8250092165 service available anytime 24 hour
celebrity 💋 Patna Escorts Just Dail 8250092165 service available anytime 24 hour
 

Business in the United States Who Owns it and How Much Tax They Pay

  • 1. Business in the United States Who Owns it and How Much Tax They Pay Michael Cooper, US Treasury Department John McClelland, US Treasury Department James Pearce, US Treasury Department Rich Prisinzano, US Treasury Department Joseph Sullivan, US Treasury Department Danny Yagan, UC Berkeley and NBER Owen Zidar, Chicago Booth and NBER Eric Zwick, Chicago Booth and NBER TPE, September 24th, 2015 *The views expressed here are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect those of the Treasury Department.
  • 2. The Rise of Pass-Throughs 0255075100 PercentageofTotalNetBusinessIncome 1980 1990 2000 2010 Year Sole Proprietorships Partnerships S Corporations C Corporations 2 / 30
  • 3. Pass-Throughs and Top-1% Income Share 510152025 Shareofincomeearnedbytop1%(%) 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Year Actual Pass−through income share fixed at 1980 level 10 p.p. increase since 1980 4.4 p.p. increase via salaries and other capital income 5.6 p.p. increase via pass-through business income 3 / 30
  • 4. This Paper We use administrative tax data from the U.S. in 2011 to: 1. Identify business owners 2. Estimate how much tax they pay 4 / 30
  • 5. This Paper We use administrative tax data from the U.S. in 2011 to: 1. Identify business owners 2. Estimate how much tax they pay We find: 1. Pass-through business income is especially concentrated 2. Average federal income tax rate on pass-throughs is 19% 3. 30% of income earned by partnerships cannot be unambiguously traced to an identifiable, ultimate owner 4 / 30
  • 6. Roadmap 1. Linking businesses to their owners 2. Who owns businesses in the pass-through sector? 3. Method for estimating average tax rates 4. Average tax rates on business income 5 / 30
  • 7. 1. Linking Businesses to Their Owners 5 / 30
  • 8. Partnerships file a business inc. tax return. . . 6 / 30
  • 9. which lists allocations only by partner type. . . 7 / 30
  • 10. . . . but are reflected in K-1s (issued per partner) 8 / 30
  • 11. Linking Partnerships to Partners Data Challenge: Partners can be one of many entity types, and different kinds of returns are processed by different systems. Our Procedure: Link K-1s to partnership returns by merging on the Document Locator Number (linking 25.5m K-1s to 3.6m partnerships) High coverage: Match 97.7% of partnerships to a K1 Match 98.2% of aggregate ordinary business income 9 / 30
  • 12. Partnerships with Partnership Partners Partnerships can be owned by other partnerships Not problematic for sector-wide analyses Problematic for industry breakdowns and possibly audits 10 / 30
  • 13. Partnerships with Partnership Partners Partnerships can be owned by other partnerships Not problematic for sector-wide analyses Problematic for industry breakdowns and possibly audits 10 / 30
  • 14. Partnerships with Partnership Partners Partnerships can be owned by other partnerships Not problematic for sector-wide analyses Problematic for industry breakdowns and possibly audits 10 / 30
  • 15. Partnerships with Partnership Partners Partnerships can be owned by other partnerships Not problematic for sector-wide analyses Problematic for industry breakdowns and possibly audits Use recursive algorithm to trace income through tiers until only “nontransparent” partnerships remain 10 / 30
  • 16. Classifying Partners Partner Type Form Filed Individual 1040 C- and other corporations 1120, 1120j ∀ j ∈ {F,PC,L,RIC,REIT,H,C,POL,ND,SF,FSC} S-corporations 1120S Tax-exempt 990, 990j ∀ j ∈ {T,R,PF,ZR,C} Estate/trust 1041 Foreign person/entity 1042, 1042S, 8805, 8288A Partnerships 1065, 1065B, 1066 Unidentified EIN Taxpayer identifier classifiable as EIN, but tax form unknown Unidentified TIN type Taxpayer identifier not classifiable 11 / 30
  • 17. Linking Other Business Types to their Owners 1. S-Corporations Owners must not be other business entities Link 1120S K1s to owner’s Form 1040 2. Sole Proprietorships Income reported directly on Form 1040 3. C-Corporations Owners are not identifiable Use dividend income from Form 1040 12 / 30
  • 18. 2. Who Owns Businesses? 12 / 30
  • 19. Number of K1s by Type of Partner 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.2 5.0 5.3 5.6 7.4 7.9 73.9 78.3 0 20 40 60 80 Number of K1s by Type of Partner (% of Total) C- and other corporations Tax-exempt S-corporations Foreign person/entity Unidentified EIN Estate/trust Partnerships Unidentified TIN type Individuals Without Partnership Partners With Partnership Partners 13 / 30
  • 20. Income Shares by Type of Partner 3.4 4.6 4.1 5.5 5.2 7.1 5.3 7.2 6.8 9.3 7.7 10.5 9.6 13.0 26.3 31.5 42.7 0 10 20 30 40 Partnership Income by Type of Partner (% of Total) S-corporations Tax-exempt Unidentified EIN Estate/trust Foreign person/entity C- and other corporations Unidentified TIN type Partnerships Individuals Without Partnership Partners With Partnership Partners 14 / 30
  • 21. Partnership Income Shares by Industry 3.5 4.1 4.6 7.0 10.8 70.0 0 20 40 60 80 Partnership Income by Partnership Industry (% of Total) Mining, Oil & Gas Health Care Manufacturing Other Professional Services Finance & Holding Cos Note: “Finance & Holding Cos” includes real estate and rental partnerships (≈ 3.1% of total) 15 / 30
  • 22. Business Participation Rates by AGI Pctile 020406080 Sharewithpositiveincome(%) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 AGI percentile Sole proprietorship income C−corporation income S−corporation income Partnership income 16 / 30
  • 23. Business Income Shares by AGI Pctile 020406080 Shareofincometype(%) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 AGI percentile Sole proprietorship income C−corporation income S−corporation income Partnership income 17 / 30
  • 24. Partnership Income Shares by AGI Pctile Three Sample Industries 010203040 Shareofpartnershipincome(%) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 AGI percentile Accommodation and Food Service (NAICS 72) Professional Services (NAICS 54) Finance, Holding Companies (NAICS 52, 55, and 531) 18 / 30
  • 25. 3. Method for Estimating Average Tax Rates 18 / 30
  • 26. Tax Rates on Income Distributed to Partners Calculated Rates Tik = TOTA ik = TAXik Yik if k files form ∈ {1040, 1120, 1120S} TAssigned ik otherwise where Tik ≡ tax rate on income type i to partner k from all partnerships p i ≡ income type in {capital gains, dividends, ordinary business income, interest} Yik ≡ sum of payment of income type i to partner k from all partnerships TAXik ≡ change in tax liability from the OTA tax calculator 19 / 30
  • 27. Tax Rates on Income Distributed to Partners Assigned Rates TAssigned ik =    TOTA i,1040 if form ∈ {1120-RIC,1120-REIT,1066,1041} TOTA i,1120 if form ∈ {1120j}∀ j ∈ {F,PC,L,H,C,POL,ND,SF,FSC} .025 if form ∈ {8805,1042S,8288A,1042} 0 if form ∈ {990,990j}∀ j ∈ {T,R,PF,ZR,C} .025+TOTA i,1120 2 if k has unidentified EIN or tin type where form is the tax form partner k files TOTA i,1040 is the tax rate for individuals from the OTA tax calculator for income type i TOTA i,1120 is the tax rate for C-corporations 20 / 30
  • 28. Aggregating Tax Rates Partnership Rates Tp = i∈I k∈K TikYikp Yp where the numerator is the sum of tax liabilities over income types i and partners k associated with payments from partnership p the denominator is the total payments from partnership p Partnership Sector Rate T = i∈I k∈K p∈P TikYikp Y where the numerator is the sum of tax liabilities from payments from partnerships the denominator is the total payments from all partnerships 21 / 30
  • 29. Tax Rates on Other Business Types 1. S-Corporations TAXS ≡ Actual tax minus hypothetical tax with zero 1120S income Tax rate is TAXS divided by actual 1120S income 2. Sole Proprietorships Same method as S-Corporations 3. C-Corporations TAXC1 ≡ Actual taxes paid First layer is TAXC1 divided by taxable income TAXC2 ≡ Estimate from Poterba (2004) for dividend+cap gains tax times income net of first layer of tax Final rate combines first and second layer of tax 22 / 30
  • 30. 4. Average Tax Rates on Business Income 22 / 30
  • 31. Tax Rate by Entity Type 13.6 15.9 25.0 22.7 31.6 0102030 Taxrate(%) Sole Proprietorships Partnerships S-corps C-corps Average Tax Rate Payout Tax Rate 23 / 30
  • 32. Tax Rates on Partnership Income By Type of Partner 0.0 2.5 11.7 12.6 15.9 16.5 20.1 21.0 22.0 0 5 10 15 20 Average Tax Rate on Partnership Income (%) Tax-exempt Foreign person/entity Unidentified TIN type Unidentified EIN Total Excluding Partnerships Estate/trust C- and other corporations Individuals S-corporations 24 / 30
  • 33. Partnership Income Type Distribution By Type of Partner 0 20 40 60 80 100 Composition of Partnership Income (%) Tax-exempt Foreign person/entity Unidentified TIN type Unidentified EIN Total Excluding Partnerships Estate/trust C- and other corporations Individuals S-corporations Ordinary Income Interest Capital Gains Dividends 25 / 30
  • 34. Tax Rates on Partnership Income By Industry 14.7 16.6 18.5 22.1 22.3 22.4 0 5 10 15 20 25 Tax Rate by Partnership Industry Finance & Holding Cos Manufacturing Mining, Oil & Gas Other Health Care Professional Services Note: “Finance & Holding Cos” includes real estate and rental partnerships (≈ 3.1% of total) 26 / 30
  • 35. Partnership Income Type Distribution By Industry 0 20 40 60 80 100 Composition of Partnership Income (%) Finance & Holding Cos Manufacturing Mining, Oil & Gas Other Health Care Professional Services Ordinary Income Interest Capital Gains Dividends Note: “Finance & Holding Cos” includes real estate and rental partnerships (≈ 3.1% of total) 27 / 30
  • 36. Partnership Ownership is Opaque 1. 20% of income earned by unclassifiable partners Use income type allocations to “guess” applicable rate 2. Not all partnership income can be uniquely linked to an originating partnership Use recursive algorithm to trace income through tiers until only “nontransparent” partnerships remain 28 / 30
  • 37. Partnership Ownership is Opaque Some Facts about Nontransparent Partnerships 1. Algorithm reaches fixed point after 22 steps 2. 22,417 nontransparent partnerships remain (out of 3.6M) 3. Unsolved partnerships issue 9.6M K1s (out of 25.5M) 4. $100B of taxable income in this group (out of $671B) 5. Tax paid on this income is 8.8% (compared to 17.1% for remaining $571B) 29 / 30
  • 38. Conclusion 1. The Rise of Pass-throughs: U.S. business activity has migrated from corporations to pass-throughs. 2. Who Owns Them? 69% of pass-through income earned by individuals accrues to the top-1% The union of income flowing (1) to unclassifiable partners and (2) through nontransparent partnerships is $200B, or 30% of income earned in the partnership sector overall. 3. How Much Tax Do They Pay? The average federal income tax rate on pass-through business income in 2011 is 19%. 4. Implication: With pass-through activity at 1980 levels: Average rate in 2011 would have been 28% (instead of 24%) Tax revenue would have been at least $100B higher 30 / 30