This document discusses the design of slender columns and two-way slabs. It provides an example problem for designing a long rectangular braced column. The steps include computing factored loads, determining the k value, checking for slenderness effects, calculating the required moment strength, and designing the reinforcement. It also compares one-way and two-way slab behavior, discussing different slab systems like flat plates, waffle slabs, and ribbed slabs.
3. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
A rectangular braced column of a multistory frame
building has floor height lu =25 ft. It is subjected to
service dead-load moments M2= 3500 k-in. on top and
M1=2500 k-in. at the bottom. The service live load
moments are 80% of the dead-load moments. The
column carries a service axial dead-load PD = 200 k
and a service axial live-load PL = 350 k. Design the
cross section size and reinforcement for this column.
Given ΨA = 1.3 and ΨB = 0.9. Use a d’=2.5 in. cover
with an sustain load = 50 % and fc = 7 ksi and fy = 60
ksi.
4. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
Compute the factored loads and moments are 80% of
the dead loads
( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
u D L
1u D L
2u D L
1.2 1.6 1.2 200 k 1.6 350 k
800 k
1.2 1.6 1.2 2500 k-in 1.6 0.8 2500 k-in
6200 k-in.
1.2 1.6 1.2 3500 k-in 1.6 0.8 3500 k-in
8680 k-in.
P P P
M M M
M M M
= + = +
=
= + = +
=
= + = +
=
5. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
Compute the k value for the braced compression
members
Therefore, use k = 0.81
( ) ( )
( )
A B
min
0.7 0.05 0.7 0.05 1.3 0.9
0.81 1.0
0.85 0.05 0.85 0.05 0.9
0.895 1.0
k
k
= + Ψ + Ψ = + +
= ≤
= + Ψ = +
= ≤
6. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
Check to see if slenderness is going to matter. An
initial estimate of the size of the column will be an inch
for every foot of height. So h = 25 in.
( ) ( )
( )
n
0.81 25 ft 12 in./ft
32.4
r 0.3 25 in.
6200 k-in.
32.4 34 12 25.43
8680 k-in.
kl
= =
≥ − = ÷
We need to be concerned with slender columns
7. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
So slenderness must be considered. Since frame has
no side sway, M2 = M2ns, δs = 0 Calculate the
minimum M2 for the ratio computations.
( ) ( )( )2,min u
2
0.6 0.03 800 k 0.6 0.03 25 in.
1080 k-in. 8680 k-in.
M P h
M
= + = +
= ⇒ =
8. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
Compute components of concrete
The moment of inertia of the column is
( )
1.51.5
c c
6 3
33 33 150 7000
5.07x10 psi 5.07x10 ksi
E w f= =
= →
( ) ( )
33
g
4
25 in. 25 in.
12 12
32552 in
bh
I = =
=
9. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
Compute the stiffness, EI
( )( )3 4
c g
d
7 2
0.4 5.07x10 ksi 32552 in0.4
1 1 0.5
4.4x10 k-in
E I
EI
β
= =
+ +
=
10. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
The critical load (buckling), Pcr, is
( )
( )
( )
2 7 22
cr 2 2
u
4.4x10 k-in
12 in.
0.81 25 ft
ft
7354.3 k
EI
P
kl
ππ
= =
÷ ÷
=
11. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
Compute the coefficient, Cm, for the magnification δ
coefficient
1
m
2
0.6 0.4
6200 k-in.
0.6 0.4 0.89 0.4
8680 k-in.
M
C
M
= + ÷
= + = ≥ ÷
12. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
The magnification factor
( )
m
ns
u
cr
0.89
800 k
1 1
0.75 0.75 7354.3 k
1.04 1.0
C
P
P
δ = =
− − ÷ ÷ ÷
= ≥
13. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
The design moment is
Therefore, the design conditions are
( )c ns 2 1.04 8680 k-in. 9027.2 k-in.M Mδ= = =
c c800 k & M 9027.2 k-in.
9027.2 k-in.
e 11.28 in.
800 k
P = =
= =
14. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
Assume that the ρ = 2.0 % or 0.020
Use 14 # 9 bars or 14 in2
( )
2 2
s 0.02 25 in. 12.5 inA = =
2
s
2
cs
7.0 in
7.0 in
A
A
=
=
15. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
The column is compression controlled so c/d > 0.6.
Check the values for c/d = 0.6
( )
( )1
0.6 0.6 22.5 in. 13.5 in.
0.7 13.5 in. 9.45 in.
c d
a cβ
= = =
= = =
16. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
Check the strain in the tension steel and compression
steel.
( ) ( )
s1 cu
cs1 s s1
cs1
13.5 in. 2.5 in.
0.003
13.5 in.
0.00244
29000 ksi 0.00244
70.76 ksi 60 ksi
c d
c
f E
f
ε ε
ε
′− −
= = ÷ ÷
=
= =
= ⇒ =
17. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
The tension steel is
( ) ( )
s cu
s s s
22.5 in. 13.5 in.
0.003
13.5 in.
0.002
29000 ksi 0.002
58 ksi
d c
c
f E
ε ε
ε
− −
= = ÷ ÷
=
= =
=
18. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
Combined forces are
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )( )
( )( )
c c
2
s1 cs cs c
2
s s
0.85 0.85 7 ksi 25 in. 9.45 in.
1405.7 k
0.85 7 in 60 ksi 0.85 7 ksi
378.35 k
7 in 58 ksi
406.0 k
C f ba
C A f f
T A f
= =
=
= − = −
=
= =
=
19. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
Combined force is
n c s1
1405.7 k 378.35 k 406.0 k
1378.05 k
P C C T= + −
= + −
=
20. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
Moment is
( )
( )
n c s1
2 2 2 2
9.45 in.
1405.7 k 12.5 in.
2
378.35 k 12.5 in. 2.5 in.
406.0 k 22.5 in. 12.5 in.
18773 k-in.
h a h h
M C C d T d
′= − + − + − ÷ ÷ ÷
= − ÷
+ −
+ −
=
21. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
The eccentricity is
Since the e = 11.28 in. < 13.62 in. The section is in the
compression controlled region φ = 0.65. You will
want to match up the eccentricity with the design.
n
n
18773 k-in
1378.05 k
13.62 in.
M
e
P
= =
=
22. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
We need to match up the eccentricity of the problem.
This done varying the c/d ratio to get the eccentricity
to match. Check the values for c/d = 0.66
( )
( )1
0.66 0.66 22.5 in. 14.85 in.
0.7 14.85 in. 10.395 in.
c d
a cβ
= = =
= = =
23. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
Check the strain in the tension steel and compression
steel.
( ) ( )
s1 cu
cs1 s s1
cs1
14.85 in. 2.5 in.
0.003
14.85 in.
0.00249
29000 ksi 0.00249
72.35 ksi 60 ksi
c d
c
f E
f
ε ε
ε
′− −
= = ÷ ÷
=
= =
= ⇒ =
24. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
The tension steel is
( ) ( )
s cu
s s s
22.5 in. 14.85 in.
0.003
14.85 in.
0.00155
29000 ksi 0.00155
44.82 ksi
d c
c
f E
ε ε
ε
− −
= = ÷ ÷
=
= =
=
25. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
Combined forces are
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )( )
( )( )
c c
2
s1 cs cs c
2
s s
0.85 0.85 7 ksi 25 in. 10.395 in.
1545.26 k
0.85 7 in 60 ksi 0.85 7 ksi
378.35 k
7 in 44.82 ksi
313.74 k
C f ba
C A f f
T A f
= =
=
= − = −
=
= =
=
26. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
Combined force is
n c s1
1546.26 k 378.35 k 313.74 k
1610.9 k
P C C T= + −
= + −
=
27. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
Moment is
( )
( )
n c s1
2 2 2 2
10.395 in.
1545.26 k 12.5 in.
2
378.35 k 12.5 in. 2.5 in.
313.74 k 22.5 in. 12.5 in.
18205.2 k-in
h a h h
M C C d T d
′= − + − + − ÷ ÷ ÷
= − ÷
+ −
+ −
=
28. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
The eccentricity is
Since the e 11.28 in. The reduction factor is equal to
φ = 0.65. Compute the design load and moment.
n
n
18205.2 k-in
1610.9 k
11.30 in.
M
e
P
= =
=
≅
29. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
The design conditions are
The problem matches the selection of the column.
( )
( )
u n
u n
0.65 1610.9 k
1047.1 k 800 k OK!
0.65 18205.2 k-in
11833.4 k-in. 9027.2 k-in. OK!
P P
M M
φ
φ
= =
= >
= =
= >
30. Design of Long Columns-Design of Long Columns-
ExampleExample
Design the ties for the column
Provide #3 ties, spacing will be the minimum of:
Therefore, provide #3 ties @ 18 in. spacing.
( )
( )
stirrup
bar
48 48 0.375 in. 18 in.
smallest 16 16 1.128 in. 18 in. controls
h 25 in.
d
s d
= =
= = = ⇐
=
31. Using Interaction DiagramsUsing Interaction Diagrams
Determine eccentricity.
Estimate column size
required base on axial load.
Determine e/h and required
φPn/Ag, φMn/(Agh)
Determine which chart to use
from fc, fy and γ. Determine
ρ from the chart.
Select steel sizes.
Check values.
Design ties by ACI code
Design sketch
33. Comparison of One-way andComparison of One-way and
Two-way slab behaviorTwo-way slab behavior
One-way slabs carry
load in one direction.
Two-way slabs carry
load in two directions.
34. Comparison of One-way andComparison of One-way and
Two-way slab behaviorTwo-way slab behavior
One-way and two-way
slab action carry load
in two directions.
One-way slabs: Generally,
long side/short side > 1.5
35. Comparison of One-way andComparison of One-way and
Two-way slab behaviorTwo-way slab behavior
Flat slab Two-way slab with beams
36. Comparison of One-way andComparison of One-way and
Two-way slab behaviorTwo-way slab behavior
For flat plates and slabs the column connections
can vary between:
37. Comparison of One-way andComparison of One-way and
Two-way slab behaviorTwo-way slab behavior
Flat Plate Waffle slab
38. Comparison of One-way andComparison of One-way and
Two-way slab behaviorTwo-way slab behavior
The two-way ribbed slab and waffled slab system:
General thickness of the slab is 2 to 4 in.
39. Comparison of One-way and Two-Comparison of One-way and Two-
way slab behavior Economicway slab behavior Economic
ChoicesChoices
Flat Plate suitable span 20 to 25 ft with LL= 60 -100 psf
Advantages
Low cost formwork
Exposed flat ceilings
Fast
Disadvantages
Low shear capacity
Low Stiffness (notable deflection)
40. Comparison of One-way andComparison of One-way and
Two-way slab behavior EconomicTwo-way slab behavior Economic
ChoicesChoices
Flat Slab suitable span 20 to 30 ft with LL= 80 -150 psf
Advantages
Low cost formwork
Exposed flat ceilings
Fast
Disadvantages
Need more formwork for capital and panels
41. Comparison of One-way and Two-Comparison of One-way and Two-
way slab behavior Economicway slab behavior Economic
ChoicesChoices
Waffle Slab suitable span 30 to 48 ft with LL= 80
-150 psf
Advantages
Carries heavy loads
Attractive exposed ceilings
Fast
Disadvantages
Formwork with panels is expensive
42. Comparison of One-way and Two-Comparison of One-way and Two-
way slab behavior Economicway slab behavior Economic
ChoicesChoices
One-way Slab on beams suitable span 10 to 20 ft with
LL= 60-100 psf
Can be used for larger spans with relatively higher
cost and higher deflections
One-way joist floor system is suitable span 20 to 30 ft
with LL= 80-120 psf
Deep ribs, the concrete and steel quantities are
relative low
Expensive formwork expected.
43. Comparison of One-way andComparison of One-way and
Two-way slab behaviorTwo-way slab behavior
ws =load taken by short direction
wl = load taken by long direction
δA = δB
Rule of Thumb: For B/A > 2,
design as one-way slab
EI
Bw
EI
Aw
384
5
384
5 4
l
4
s
=
ls
4
4
l
s
162ABFor ww
A
B
w
w
=⇒==
44. Two-Way Slab DesignTwo-Way Slab Design
Static Equilibrium of Two-Way Slabs
Analogy of two-way slab to plank and beam floor
Section A-A:
Moment per ft width in planks
Total Moment
ft/ft-k
8
2
1wl
M =⇒
( ) ft-k
8
2
1
2f
l
wlM =⇒
45. Two-Way Slab DesignTwo-Way Slab Design
Static Equilibrium of Two-Way Slabs
Analogy of two-way slab to plank and beam floor
Uniform load on each beam
Moment in one beam (Sec: B-B) ft-k
82
2
21
lb
lwl
M
=⇒
k/ft
2
1wl
⇒
46. Two-Way Slab DesignTwo-Way Slab Design
Static Equilibrium of Two-Way Slabs
Total Moment in both beams
Full load was transferred east-west by the planks and then was
transferred north-south by the beams;
The same is true for a two-way slab or any other floor system.
( ) ft-k
8
2
2
1
l
wlM =⇒
47. General Design ConceptsGeneral Design Concepts
(1) Direct Design Method (DDM)
Limited to slab systems to uniformly distributed
loads and supported on equally spaced columns.
Method uses a set of coefficients to determine the
design moment at critical sections. Two-way slab
system that do not meet the limitations of the ACI
Code 13.6.1 must be analyzed more accurate
procedures
48. General Design ConceptsGeneral Design Concepts
(2) Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)
A three-dimensional building is divided into a
series of two-dimensional equivalent frames by
cutting the building along lines midway between
columns. The resulting frames are considered
separately in the longitudinal and transverse
directions of the building and treated floor by
floor.
51. Method of AnalysisMethod of Analysis
(1) Elastic Analysis
Concrete slab may be treated as an elastic
plate. Use Timoshenko’s method of analyzing
the structure. Finite element analysis
52. Method of AnalysisMethod of Analysis
(2) Plastic Analysis
The yield method used to determine the limit state of
slab by considering the yield lines that occur in the
slab as a collapse mechanism.
The strip method, where slab is divided into strips
and the load on the slab is distributed in two
orthogonal directions and the strips are analyzed as
beams.
The optimal analysis presents methods for
minimizing the reinforcement based on plastic
analysis
53. Method of AnalysisMethod of Analysis
(3) Nonlinear analysis
Simulates the true load-deformation characteristics
of a reinforced concrete slab with finite-element
method takes into consideration of nonlinearities of
the stress-strain relationship of the individual
members.
54. Column and Middle StripsColumn and Middle Strips
The slab is broken
up into column
and middle strips
for analysis
55. Minimum Slab Thickness forMinimum Slab Thickness for
Two-way ConstructionTwo-way Construction
The ACI Code 9.5.3 specifies a minimum slab thickness
to control deflection. There are three empirical
limitations for calculating the slab thickness (h), which
are based on experimental research. If these limitations
are not met, it will be necessary to compute deflection.
56. Minimum Slab Thickness forMinimum Slab Thickness for
Two-way ConstructionTwo-way Construction
22.0 m ≤≤α(a) For
( )2.0536
200,000
8.0
m
y
n
−+
+
=
αβ
f
l
h
fy in psi. But not less than 5 in.
57. Minimum Slab Thickness forMinimum Slab Thickness for
Two-way ConstructionTwo-way Construction
m2 α<(b) For
β936
200,000
8.0 y
n
+
+
=
f
l
h
fy in psi. But not less than 3.5 in.
58. Minimum Slab Thickness forMinimum Slab Thickness for
Two-way ConstructionTwo-way Construction
2.0m <α(c) For
Use the following table 9.5(c)
59. Minimum Slab Thickness forMinimum Slab Thickness for
Two-way ConstructionTwo-way Construction
Slabs without interior
beams spanning
between supports and
ratio of long span to
short span < 2
See section 9.5.3.3
For slabs with beams
spanning between
supports on all sides.
60. Minimum Slab Thickness forMinimum Slab Thickness for
two-way constructiontwo-way construction
The definitions of the terms are:
h = Minimum slab thickness without interior beams
ln =
β =
αm=
Clear span in the long direction measured face to
face of column
the ratio of the long to short clear span
The average value of α for all beams on the sides
of the panel.
61. Definition of Beam-to-Slab StiffnessDefinition of Beam-to-Slab Stiffness
Ratio,Ratio, αα
Accounts for stiffness effect of beams located along
slab edge reduces deflections of panel
adjacent to beams.
slabofstiffnessflexural
beamofstiffnessflexural
=α
62. Definition of Beam-to-Slab StiffnessDefinition of Beam-to-Slab Stiffness
Ratio,Ratio, αα
With width bounded laterally by centerline of
adjacent panels on each side of the beam.
scs
bcb
scs
bcb
E
E
/4E
/4E
I
I
lI
lI
==α
slabuncrackedofinertiaofMomentI
beamuncrackedofinertiaofMomentI
concreteslabofelasticityofModulusE
concretebeamofelasticityofModulusE
s
b
sb
cb
=
=
=
=
63. Beam and Slab Sections forBeam and Slab Sections for
calculation ofcalculation of αα
64. Beam and Slab Sections forBeam and Slab Sections for
calculation ofcalculation of αα
65. Beam and Slab Sections forBeam and Slab Sections for
calculation ofcalculation of αα
Definition of beam cross-section
Charts may be used to calculate α
66. Minimum Slab Thickness forMinimum Slab Thickness for
Two-way ConstructionTwo-way Construction
Slabs without drop panels meeting 13.3.7.1 and 13.3.7.2,
tmin = 5 in
Slabs with drop panels meeting 13.3.7.1 and 13.3.7.2,
tmin = 4 in
67. Example - SlabExample - Slab
A flat plate floor system with
panels 24 by 20 ft is supported on
20 in. square columns.
Determine the minimum slab
thickness required for the interior
and corner panels. Use fc = 4 ksi
and fy = 60 ksi
68. Example - SlabExample - Slab
Slab thickness, from table 9.5(c) for fy = 60 ksi
and no edge beams
n
min
n
min
30
20 in. 1 ft.
24 ft. 2 22.33 ft.
2 12 in.
12 in.
22.33 ft.
1 ft.
8.93 in. 9 in.
30
l
h
l
h
=
= − = ÷
÷
= = ⇒
69. Example - SlabExample - Slab
Slab thickness, from table 9.5(c) for fy = 60 ksi
and no edge beams for α = αm = 0 (no beams)
n
min
min
33
12 in.
22.33 ft.
1 ft.
8.12 in. 8.5 in.
33
l
h
h
=
÷
= = ⇒
70. Example –Example – αα CalculationsCalculations
The floor system consists of
solid slabs and beams in two
directions supported on 20-in.
square columns. Determine the
minimum slab thickness, h,
required for the floor system.
Use fc = 4 ksi and fy = 60 ksi
72. Example –Example – αα CalculationsCalculations
To find h, we need to find αm therefore Ib, Islab and α for
each beam and slab in long short direction. Assume
slab thickness h = 7 in. so that x = y < 4 tf
( )f22 in. 7 in. 15 in. 4 4 7 in. 28 in.t− = < = =
( )e 16 in. 2 15 in. 46 in.b = + =
73. Example –Example – αα CalculationsCalculations
Compute the moment of inertia and centroid
b h Ai (in2
) yi (in) yiAi (in3
) I (in4
) d (in) d2
A (in4
)
Flange 7 46 322 3.5 1127 1314.833 -4.69751 7105.442
Beam 15 16 240 14.5 3480 4500 6.302491 9533.135
562 4607 5814.833 16638.58
ybar = 8.197509 in
I = 22453.41 in4
( )
4
beam
33
slab
4
22453 in
1 1 12 in.
20 ft 7 in.
12 12 1 ft.
6860 in
I
I bh
=
= = ÷ ÷
=
74. Example –Example – αα CalculationsCalculations
Compute the α coefficient for the long direction
Short side of the moment of inertia
4
beam
long 4
slab
22453 in
6860 in
3.27
EI
EI
α = =
=
( )
33
slab
4
1 1 12 in.
24 ft 7 in.
12 12 1 ft.
8232 in
I bh
= = ÷ ÷
=
75. Example –Example – αα CalculationsCalculations
Compute the α coefficient for short direction
The average αm for an interior panel is
4
beam
short 4
slab
22453 in
8232 in
2.73
EI
EI
α = =
=
( ) ( )long short
avg
2 2 2 3.27 2 2.73
4 4
3.0
α α
α
+ +
= =
=
76. Example –Example – αα CalculationsCalculations
Compute the β coefficient
Compute the thickness for αm > 2
Use slab thickness, 6.5 in. or 7 in.
long
short
20 in. 1 ft.
24 ft. 2
2 12 in.
1.22
20 in. 1 ft.
20 ft. 2
2 12 in.
l
l
β
− ÷
= = =
− ÷
( )
y
n
12 in. 600000.8 22.33 ft. 0.8
200000 1 ft. 200000
36 9 36 9 1.22
6.28 in.
f
l
h
β
+ + ÷ = =
+ +
= ⇒
77. Example –Example – αα CalculationsCalculations
Compute the moment of inertia and centroid for the
L-beam
b h Ai (in2
) yi (in) yiAi (in3
) I (in4
) d (in) d2
A (in4
)
Flange 7 27 189 3.5 661.5 771.75 -5.36585 5441.761
Beam 15 12 180 14.5 2610 3375 5.634146 5713.849
369 3271.5 4146.75 11155.61
ybar = 8.865854 in
I = 15302.36 in4
( )
4
L-beam
33
slab
4
15302 in
1 1 12 in.
10 ft 7 in.
12 12 1 ft.
3430 in
I
I bh
=
= = ÷ ÷
=
78. Example –Example – αα CalculationsCalculations
Compute the αm coefficient for long direction
Short side of the moment of inertia
4
L-beam
long 4
slab
15302 in
3430 in
4.46
EI
EI
α = =
=
( )
33
slab
4
1 1 12 in.
12 ft 7 in.
12 12 1 ft.
4116 in
I bh
= = ÷ ÷
=
79. Example –Example – αα CalculationsCalculations
Compute the αm coefficient for the short direction
4
L-beam
short 4
slab
15302 in
4116 in
3.72
EI
EI
α = =
=
80. Example –Example – αα CalculationsCalculations
Compute the αm coefficient for the edges and corner
m
4.46 2.73 3.27 2.73
4
3.30
α
+ + +
=
=
m
3.72 3.27 2.73 3.27
4
3.25
α
+ + +
=
=
81. Example –Example – αα CalculationsCalculations
Compute the αm coefficient for the edges and corner
m
3.72 4.46 2.73 3.27
4
3.55
α
+ + +
=
=
82. Example –Example – αα CalculationsCalculations
Compute the largest length ln of the slab/beam, edge to
first interior column.
n
20 in. 1 ft. 12 in. 1 ft.
24 ft.
2 12 in. 2 12 in.
22.67 ft.
l
= − − ÷ ÷
=
83. Example –Example – αα CalculationsCalculations
Compute the thickness of the slab with αm > 2
The overall depth of the slab is 7 in.
Use slab thickness, 6.5 in. or 7 in.
( )
y
n
12 in. 600000.8 22.67 ft. 0.8
200000 1 ft. 200000
36 9 36 9 1.22
6.37 in.
f
l
h
β
+ + ÷ = =
+ +
= ⇒