Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Tendances
Tendances (20)
Similaire à Regenerative Building Design
Similaire à Regenerative Building Design (20)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
Regenerative Building Design
- 1. May 05, 2020 Regenerative Building Design 2 0 2 2 P L A N U P D AT E
- 2. We exist to make great things possible.
- 3. We have defined great things as those things that improve the human condition.
- 4. Things like Food Water Shelter Safety Security Well-being Belonging Acceptance Value Personal growth
- 5. Today, those things are constantly threatened on both social and ecological dimensions Warming Planet Biodiversity Loss Social Inequity Natural Disasters Topsoil Depletion Urbanization Resource Scarcity Air, Water and Waste Pollution Rising Sea Levels Food Shortages Economic Brittleness Population Growth
- 7. Design that emulates natural systems for the continuous renewal of social and ecological functions. PUT SIMPLY What is Regenerative Design?
- 10. A unified and flexible framework that holistically addresses ALL HDR projects and our client’s future aspirations • Sustainable Design • Resiliency • Health + Wellness • Social Equity • Triple Net Zero • Carbon Balanced Buildings • Material Transparency What is The Regenerative Design Framework?
- 13. QUESTIONS FOR TODAY’S BUILT ENVIRONMENT HOW DO WE MAKE BUILDINGSWHICH: • BETTER SERVE COMMUNITY • ARE ACCESSIBLETO ALL • PROVIDE EQUITYOF ACCESSTO THE DESIGN PROCESS
- 14. HOW DO WE MAKE BUILDINGSWHICH: • SUPPORTHUMAN HEALTH INDOORS • AVOID CHEMICALSOF CONCERN • PROVIDE FRESHAIR • CREATE CONDITIONS THAT SUPPORTHEALTHY ACTIVITIES • PROVIDE BETTER CONNECTIONSTO NATURE IN BUILDINGS QUESTIONS FOR TODAY’S BUILT ENVIRONMENT
- 15. HOW DO WE MAKE BUILDINGSWHICH: • AVOID AIRBORN CHEMICALSWHICH IMPACT HUMAN HEALTH • ELIMINATE GREENHOUSEGAS EMISSIONS • PREVENT NEGATIVE IMPACT TO OTHER SPECIES CO2 N2O O3 CH4 CHF3 C2F6 CCl3F C24H38O4 SOOT QUESTIONS FOR TODAY’S BUILT ENVIRONMENT
- 16. HOW DO WE MAKE BUILDINGSWHICH: • AVOID OPERATIONAL CARBON EMISSIONS • SEQUESTERMORE CARBON IN BUILDING MATERIALSTHAN ARE EMITTED IN THE REMAINDER OF MATERIALS • ACHIEVE NET ZERO ENERGYSOLUTIONS QUESTIONS FOR TODAY’S BUILT ENVIRONMENT
- 17. HOW DO WE MAKE BUILDINGSWHICH: • CONSERVECOMMUNITY WATER RESOURCES • MAINTAINWATER QUALITYFOR OCCUPANTS • MANAGESTORMWATER WITHOUT IMPACT TO OTHER SPECIES • AVOID PROCESSUSES LIKE EVAPORATION AS PART OF WATER CONSUMPTION QUESTIONS FOR TODAY’S BUILT ENVIRONMENT
- 18. HOW DO WE MAKE BUILDINGSWHICH: • AVOID SOIL CONTAMINATION • IMPACTING SPECIES AT RISK • KEEP ENDOCRINE DISRUPTORSFROM IMPACTING HEALTH • REMOVE NUTRIENTS FROMBUILDING EFFLUENT QUESTIONS FOR TODAY’S BUILT ENVIRONMENT
- 19. HOW DO WE MAKE BUILDINGSWHICH: • SUPPORTEXISTING SPECIESLIFEWAYS • IMPROVEHABITATSFOR RECOVERING SPECIES • RE-ESTABLISHECO- SYSTEMDIVERSITY • CREATE HUMAN CONNECTIONTO SUPPORTLONG TERM BIODIVERSITY QUESTIONS FOR TODAY’S BUILT ENVIRONMENT
- 21. HUMAN HEALTH COMMUNITY AIR CARBON WATER BIODIVERSITY NUTRIENTS CATEGORIESIN TODAY’S BUILT ENVIRONMENT
- 22. Why us? We have everyone we need. Architects | Scientists | Engineers | Economists | Urban Planners | Communication Strategists | Data Analysts | Health Practitioners | Biomimicry Experts | Healthy Materials Experts | Energy Modelers | Meteorologists | Researchers | We have everyone we need.
- 23. We have everyone we need. Resiliency Planning | EcosystemRestoration| Net Zero Buildings | Urban Planning and Design | Campus Decarbonization| Renewables Generation| Waste Planning | Air Quality | Water Quality | Post-occupancy Evaluation & Measurement | Sustainable Value Assessment | Energy Efficiency Modeling | We have all the services we need.
- 25. 30 Regenerative Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
- 26. HOW TO USE IT
- 27. Project Visioning – KPI Prioritization
- 28. Canadian Nuclear Lab ANMRC Project
- 29. Benchmarking, Goal Setting, and Metrics Geographical Information Biodiversity Mapping - www.biodiversitymapping.org Air Quality - https://www.epa.gov/outdoor-air-quality-data Impaired Waterways - https://www.epa.gov/waterdata Soil Nutrients - https://data.nal.usda.gov/dataset/snap-soil- nutrient-assessment-program Databases Gallup Well-Being Index Gentrification / Social Vulnerability / Climate Vulnerability - https://www.st.nmfs.noaa/social-indicators/map Access to Green Spaces / Quality of Local Environment - http://www.oecd.org/ Standards LEED WELL Living Building SEED
- 30. Metrics established at the most granular level if possible
- 31. Predictive Modeling and Post Occupancy Evaluations Regenerative Zone Net Zero Impact Zone Project Goal Code Benchmark Predictive Modeling WATER Infiltration
- 32. Project Displays and Reporting
- 33. Base Flexible Client Prioritization Measurement& Verification Universal; Flexible; Data-Driven Benchmarking and Goal Setting Design and PredictiveModeling
- 34. IN USE
- 38. CARBON
- 40. REGENERATIVE RANGE CODE (% reduction tons CO2 / year) 40% e tons(105% +) GIS DATA DATABASE STANDARDS OPERATIONAL CARBON– Regenerative Sequestration Target User inputs Outputs X (% Predicted EnergyUse Reduction) Pristine Site Vegetation Carbon capture peryear = 0.8487 tonsper acre Automation Typical BuildingAnnual Carbon Use (tons) X 1.05 = a tons HDR Building Carbonand Sequestration Calculator Building Type Building Size (SF / SM) Project Location / Plant selection PROJECT OPERATIONAL CARBON ECOLOGICALSITE CARBON CAPTURE LOSS = d tons + + ANNUALWATERUSE& CONVEYANCE ANNUALWASTE CONVEYANCE& LIFECYCLE Site Area Annual Carbon Capture Loss (tons) Building Type Building Occupants X (% Predicted WaterUse Reduction) HDR Water Tool(not simplified online yet) Annual Carbon Use (tons) X 1.05 = b tons + c tons Annual Carbon Use (tons) X 1.05 = = Building Type Building Occupants X (% Predicted Waste Reduction) Waste Calculator (not created) EPAGHG impacts CBECS2012 database EPAvegetation carbon calculator EPAegrid - 5% sequestration X 1.05
- 41. REGENERATIVE RANGE CODE (% reduction tons CO2 at occupancy) 40% e tons(105% +) GIS DATA DATABASE STANDARDS EMBODIED CARBON– Regenerative Sequestration Target User inputs Outputs Automation = - 5% sequestration Embodied Carbon of building materials (tons) BuildingFootprint (SF / SM) FoundationDepth (feet / m) Project Location Weighted average (%) of organic matter for project location BUILDINGEMBODIED CARBON SOIL REMOVED CARBON CAPTURELOSS a tons X 1.05 = Future material carbon calculator in online tool Project / Building Type Building Size (SF / SM) USDA web soil survey USDA web soil survey StructuralSystem Selection Envelope Mtl/ Insulation Selection OR Carbon disturbed by diggingand grading the soil for the building and projectsite (tons) b tons = X 1.05
- 42. PROJECT GOAL REGENERATIVE RANGE Orange County Sanitation District CARBON - Operational CODE (% reduction kg CO2 /SF/ year) 47% 105% 101.5% GIS DATABASE STANDARD 60% PREDICTED VALUE
- 43. Orange County Sanitation District CARBON - Embodied 0% (% reduction of kg CO2 /SF) 180% CODE PROJECT GOAL REGENERATIVE RANGE 105% 50% GIS DATABASE STANDARD PREDICTED VALUE
- 44. HUMAN HEALTH – Indoor Environment 0% (% of Quality Views) 79% CODE PROJECT GOAL REGENERATIVE RANGE 95% 50% GIS DATABASE STANDARDS 428 Minneapolis Organization f or Economic Cooperation and Development PREDICTED VALUE
- 45. HUMAN HEALTH
- 46. COMMUNITY– Social Justice / Equity 0 (# of Steps Executed in the HDR Social Equity Toolkit) 4 6 3 GIS DATABASE STANDARDS Organization f or Economic Cooperation and Development East Vancouver Integrated Healthand Social Housing CODE PROJECT GOAL REGENERATIVE RANGE PREDICTED VALUE
- 47. COMMUNITY Things to consider: - Site Specific Scope 3 witha drop down menuof things to be included - Transportation from all operations or just travel to the site or vehicles on site??? - Scope 3 Pharma - Others from NHS image Kevin Sent - On-site combustion restrictions
- 48. COMMUNITY – FEMA SOCIAL VUNERABILITY
- 49. COMMUNITY – FEMA SOCIAL VUNERABILITY
- 50. HDR Social Equity Initiative • Advocating with those who have a limited voice in public life • Building structures for inclusion that engage stakeholders and allow communities to make decisions • Promoting social equality through discourse that reflects a range of values and social identities 1. How the design is a response to the selected issue; what research was conducted and how? 2. What participation tactics for the local community were used? 3. How will the project's success be defined and results measured relative to the cited issue?
- 51. Projects will execute a 6-Step process in order to identify the most impactful community equity issues, engage pertinent community organizations if possible, implement design strategies that seek to address these issues, and put processes in place to maintain equity measures from design through occupancy and where feasible to assess the effectiveness of those measures on the community after project completion. Project leadershipidentifies key community parameters and establishes target outcomes for equity to guideprocess. Discovery and Definition Define how the issues benefit or burden the community based on input from as rich a representation of all stakeholders as possible. StakeholderEngagement and Data Analysis In depth analysis of issues to assess impacts and alignment with equity outcomes. Burden/ BenefitAnalysis Develop strategies to create greater equity or minimize unintended consequences. Advancing Opportunity and Minimizing Harm Commitment to track impacts through post occupancy evaluations and broader community evaluationtools over time. Evaluation and Accountability Share information learnedfrom analysis and unresolved issue with project leadership, clients and stakeholders. Assessment and Reporting +16.6% COMMUNITY +16.6% +16.6% +16.6% +16.6% +16.6%
- 52. BIODIVERSITY – Habitat 0 (% of Site Ecological Performance Compliance or Habitat Exchange) 75% LEED GOAL REGENERATIV E RANGE 100% 40% GIS DATABASE STANDARDS Hamilton Center PREDICTED VALUE
- 53. BIODIVERSITY
- 54. WATER- Runoff 3.0 (Peak runoff - cubic feet per second) 1.6 CODE PROJECT GOAL REGENERATIV E RANGE 2.1 GIS / DATABASE / STANDARD 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Flow Rate (cfs) % of Time Flow Rate Equaled or Exceeded Flow Rate Exceedance Comparison 1.3-Year Post- development With Project 1.3-Year Existing 1.3-Year Post- development Without Project
- 55. NUTRIENTS
- 56. NUTRIENTS
- 57. NUTRIENTS
- 58. NUTRIENTS- Top Soil Building 0 in (inches of soil) 6in CODE PROJECT GOAL REGENERATIV E RANGE 5 in GIS / DATABASE / STANDARD
- 59. WATER
- 61. NRCS Soil Data Viewer NRCS Hydrologic Soil Group Pristine Site Selection Page Web ApplicationTool USDA ArcGISDataset Layer Pristine Site Selection Page Land Use Type USFS Land Cover USFSArcGISDatasetLayer Hydrologic Modellingto calculaterunoff in inches/hour Web ApplicationTool NOAA Atlas 14 PF Table (inchesof precipitationfor 2- year column) NOAA Atlas 14 PF Table Pristine Site Selection Page Web ApplicationTool NOAA Atlas 14 *Used in tandem with land use to find runoff coefficient *Used to find Curve Number *Rainfall intensity in inches/hour WATER RUNOFF– Regenerative Target User inputs Outputs Automation Runoff for the pristine site (in/hour)
- 62. NUTRIENTS- Top Soil Building 0 in (inches of soil) 6in CODE PROJECT GOAL REGENERATIV E RANGE 5 in GIS / DATABASE / STANDARD
- 63. AIR QUALITY - AQI 0 On-site emissions Air Quality Index (AQI) value 0 CODE PROJECT GOAL REGENERATIV E RANGE GIS / DATABASE / STANDARD 25
- 64. AIR
- 65. AIR
- 66. AIR
- 67. HUMAN HEALTH