1. 102
COURTS-MARTIAL AT RICHMOND
BARRACKS.
THE SHOOTING OF FRANCIS SHEEHY
SKEFFINGTON.
The court-martial on Captain J. C. Bowen-
Colthurst, Royal Irish kmes, in connection
with the shooting of three men named F.
Slieehy Skeffmgton, Thomas Dickson,, and
Patrick Maclntyre at Portobello Barracks, Dub-
lin, 0.1 the 26th April last, opened at the
Richmond Barracks, Dublin, at 10 o'clock
on Tuesday, 6th June.
Admission to the court was by ticket, and
at the opening of the proceedings there were
about 100 civilians present, including - number
of ladies. Dr. Skeffmgton, M.A., L.L.D.,
J. P., lather of Mr. Sheehy Skeffmgton, and
Mrs. Sheehy Skeffmgton (widow) were pre-
sent during* the proceedings. The Court
was constituted as follows :—Major-General
Lord Cheylesmore (presiding), Colonel H. M.
Thoyts, Lieutenant-Colonel Murray, temporary
Lieutenant-Colonel H. Taylor, Temporary
Lieutenant-Colonel L. G. Redding, Temporary
Lieutenant-Colonel Simmons, Temporary Lieu-
tenant-Colonel W. J. Kent, Major W. E. R.
Colhs, Major D. S. Matthews, Temporary
Major E. C. Hamilton, Temporary Major H.
Montgomery, Temporary Major M. A. Tighe,
and Temporary Major H. Johnson.
Waiting Members—Major A. B. L. Wood,
D.S.O. ; Temporary Major Davenport, Tem-
porary Major Hon! J. P.. N. Ridley.
Prosecutor—Major Kimber. Judge Advocate
—Mr. Marshall.
Mr. James Chambers, K.C.. M.P.. and Mr.
Andrews (instructed by Mr. C. H. Denroche),
appeared for the prisoner. Mr. T. M. Heaiy.
K.C., M.I'., and Mr. P. O'C. White (instructed
by Mr. Lemass). appeared on behalf of Mrs.
Sheehy Skeffmgton. but they did not intervene
in the proceedings.
THE INDICTMENT.
The Judge Advocate read the charges
against Captain Bowen Colthurst, which were:
(1) That on the 26th April, 1916, at Porto-
bello Barracks, he murdered Francis Sheehy-
Skeffington.
(2) That he was guilty of the manslaughter
of Francis Sheehv-Skcffingtnn.
(3) 'J hat on the 26th April, at Poitobello
Barracks, lie murdered Thomas Dickson.
(4) That he was guilty of the manslaughter
of Lickson.
(5) That on the 25th April, at Portobello
Barracks, lie murdered Patrick Maclntyre.
(fc) '1 hat he was guilty of the manslaughter
of Maclntyre.
The prisoner, in a loud clear voice, pleaded
''
/ 1
*
t guilty " to t lie several charges.
THE STORY OF THE TRAGEDY.
Major Kimber, the prosecutor, stating the
-aid the accused was charged with the
murder of three |:i*ms—Mr. T. tSheehy
feUt llingf.Mii, Mr. TJios. Dickson, and Mr. P.
Maclntyre—and in the alternative he was
charged with the manslaughter of these men.
About six o'clock on the evening of Tuesday,
April 25, the accused was with part of his
regiment (the Royal Irish Rifles) at Porto-
bello Barracks, Dublin. At Portobello Bridge
there was stationed a picket of about thirty
men under command of Lieutenant Morris,
guarding the bridge. IN ear the bridge was a
publichouse called Davy's, and a short dis-
tance from the publichouse was Jacob's fac-
tory, which was held by the rebels. Firing
was going on from the factory towards Porto-
bello Bridge, and information had reached
Lieutenant Morris that there was a possibility
•
—nay, more—that there were thoughts of an
attack on Portobello Barracks. There were
about 300 men stationed in the barracks, but,
of course, a considerable part of that number
was on duty in the streets about that time.
In the other direction from the budge lay
Portobello Barracks—the opposite side from
Jacob's. The rebels were advancing from
that direction. Between 6 and 7 o'clock on
Tuesday night firing was going on from
Jacob's direction, and also from the rebels
who were coming up in the direction of Porto-
bello Barracks. One of the deceased men
—
Mr. Sheehy Skeflington—advanced, followed
by a crowd, from the direction of the factory
towards the Portobello Barracks. It was only
fair to say that he was going in t«e direction
of his home. Lieutenant Morris allowed him
to nass, but two soldiers followed him and
took him to the guardroom.
MR. SKEFFINGTON BEFORE THE ADJUTANT.
About half-past 8 o'clock that evening Mr.
Skeffmgton was brought before the Adjutant.
The Adjutant asked him if he was a *
Sin*
Feiner," and lie replied that he Was in sym,
pathy with the movement, but not in favour
of militarism. He was taken back to the
guardroom. Meanwhile two other men. Dick-
son and Maclntyre, were brought in, and
they were, with six or eight others, placed
in the guardroom. Dickson was the editor
of a paper called The Eye-Opener. Mac-
lntyre was the editor (if a paper called the
Searchlight, and Sksffington was a well-
known journalist in Dublin. The men were
left in the guardroom during the night. The
rebellion continued, and firing went on
throughout the night around the barracks,
and the rebels were in possession of the
points he had mentioned. The accused officer
went to the guardroom about 10.20 on vVed-
nesday morning. There were other officers there
and the sergeant of the guard. He said to
one of the officers
—" I am taking these pri-
soners out of the guardroom, and I am going
to shoot them, as 1 think it is the ri"l thing
to do " One of the officers proceeded to the
orderly room, and reported to the Adjutant
what he had beard, and the Adjutant sent
a message to the accused. He (prosecutor)
did nnt know if that message reached the
accused. He rather I lought it did not; but
the fact was that the accused returned to the
guardroom and ordered the three men out
into the yard, lie took seven men, armed
with rifles and ammunition, with him. The
2. 103
yard at the back of the guardroom was en-
closed by a wall twelve feet high. The ac-
cused had the men placed against the wall,
and he ordered the soldiers to load and fire.
The three men were shot by his orders. Hav-
ing done that, he went to the orderly room
and reported that he had ordered the three
men to be shot, giving as his reasons, first,
to prevent any possibility of escape; second,
to prevent their being rescued by armed
force. Apparently he then began to think
that he had probablv done what he oucht
not to have done, and he went in search of
the commanding officer of the battalion (Major
Roxburgh), who was at the time in barracks,
and who instructed him to make a report of
the matter. This the accused did, and the
whole affair was submitted' to the Com-
mander-in-Chief.
LIEUTENANT MORRIS.
Lieut. M. C. Morris, 11th East Surrey Regi-
ment, gave evidence that he was attached to
the 3rd Royal Irish Rifles at Portobello Bar-
racks, and was in command of a picket of 30
men of that regiment on Tuesday, 25th April.
He bore out the prosecutor's statement of the
approach and arrest of Mr.Sheehy-Skeffington,
who was not armed. In reply to questions by
Mr. Chambers, witness said his men reported
that a machine gun was seen on the top of a
house near Jacob's factory, and he saw men in
civilian clothes moving something across a
roof in the direction where the firing was
going on. A machine gun was fired in that
direction.
SERGEANT MAXWELL.
Sergeant John Arthur Maxwell, 7149 3rd
Royal Irish Rifles, stated he was at Porto-
bello . Barracks on the 25th April last, and
acting on instructions he took Mr. Sheeny
Skeffington to tne orderly room to
be examined by the Adjutant. He
heard Mr. Morgan ask Mr. Sheehv Skefllngton
was he in sympathy with the Sinn Fciners,
and he made answer to the effect that he was,
but that he did not believe in passive resist-
ance. He said something about militarism,
which witness could not understand.
LIEUTENANT MORGAN.
Lieut. Samuel Valentine Morgan, adjutant,
3rd Royal Irish Rifles, said at about 8.15
o'clock that evening he asked' Mr. Sheehy
Skeffington if he was a Sinn Feincr. He said
he was not. Witness also asked him was he in
favour of the Sinn Fein movement. He said
he was in sympathy with the Sinn Feiners,
but he was not in favour of militarism.
Next morning the accused came to the
orderly room about 10.20 o'clock, and re-
ported that be had shot three prisoners
—
—Sheehy Skefrington, and the editors of the
Spark 'and the Eye-OjH'ner. He said he
feared they might be rescued by armed force.
He also said that he had lost a brother
in this war, and that he was as good an Irish-
man as the men he had shot. Witness re-
ported to Major Smith of the Headquarters
of the Irish Command, and to Major Ros-
borough, who was in command of the bat-
talion.
Cross-examined by Mr. Andrews, witness
said that snio^g went on vn the immediate
vicinity of the barracks, and actually at the
barracks. Among the casualties sustained by
those stationed at the barracks were a second
lieutenant killed, four officers wounded, while
there were sixteen casualties in the rank
and file. They all belonged to the same
battalion as the prisoner.
Second Lieutenant Wm. Price Dobbin, of
the 3rd Royal Irish Fusiliers, stated that
he was at Portobello Barracks on the 26th
April, in command of the main guard. There
were, he thought, eight civilian prisoners in
the guardroom. He did not know either
Skeffington, Dickson, or Maclntyre. He saw
the accused going into the guardroom thai
Photo &?/] [Elliot! and Fry.
MAJOR GENERAL H. F. LORD CHEYLESMORB,
who presided over the Courts-martial at
Richmond Barracks.
/
morning. He came out again, and then said
to w.tness, to the best of his belief, " I am
taking these men out of the guardroom, and I
am going to shoot them, as I think it is
the right thing to do," or words to that
effect." Witness, continuing, said that at
the back of the guardroom was a yard
enclosed by a wall ten or twelve feet high.
The. three men were taken out into the yard,
and he heard shots fired as from the yard.
Re went into the yard and saw three men
lying dead there. He knew Sheehy-Skeffmg-
ton from his appearance the night before,
wf)en he heard his name mentioned. Witness
knew the body. He, did not examine the
bodies that he saw on the ground, but he saw
3. 104
Mood on the ground. He did not examine
Sheehy Skeffington's body to see whether he
was dead or alive. He was some distance
from the bodies.
Cross-examined by Mr. Chambers, tho
witness said he and other men were con-
stantly on duty for three days. There was
shooting going on in the neighbourhood of
the barracks. Some of his men were wounded
on Portobello Bridge. He had heard that a
machine gun had been trained on the roof of
some house by the rebels, but he did not
eee it.
Replying to questions put by the President
witness said that when Capt. Colthurst came
out of the guardroom he appeared in an
excited state, which was not his usual man-
ner.
"TO SHOOT AGAIN."
In your previous evidence you made a state-
ment which you have-
not corroborated
to-day. You were asked by the prosecutor if
you noticed anything regarding one of the
bodies, and A'ou said "Nothing in par-
ticular." That is your answer to the pro-
secutor to-day. Did you notice anything par-
ticular about one of these bodies? I did.
What wT
as it? I noticed a movement of one
of the legs of Slieehy Skeftington.
What did you do then? I sent an officer
to the orderly room. That officer was Lieut.
Tooley. and what I wanted to know was what
steps I was to take.
Did you send the officer specially to. the
accused? No, but simply to the Orderly.
What was the answer received by you?
The order was that I was to shoot again.
Who sent that order? Capt. Colthurst.
How do vou know it was he? Lieutenant
Tooley told me.
What did vou do then? I stood by four men
of my guard, and I complied with the order.
The President— Perhaps after this evidence
counsel for the defence would like to cross-
ex.anfin's the witness.
Mr. Chambers (to witness)---What sort of
a movement was it that ypu s:-iw —was it a
twij|^4'|rff a hi 's.'h ':
1 ihni't .know.
l;.iri
;
yi;ti believe Skeffiigton to -he then
(had. nr that he v.-s living'.' I W keve he was
Th.it lie was dead; I cannot say. In mj
opinion he was- done for,
'
The I'r.rsldcnt— L'y "done fur " you mean
dead? :
^es.
SEBCEANT ALDRIDGE, iCth R.D.F.
Sergeant '
John * William Aldririge, 10th
Ball. Royal Dublin Fusiliers, said he was at
Portobello Barracks on the 26th April last
attached tb't'he Royal Irish' Rifles.' At about
9 a.m. on that date le relieved a sergeant of
the Royal Irish Rifles, who is now at the
front.! At about 10.20 Capt. Bowen CoHhurst
him. he wanted men named Maelntyre,
oiij and Sheehy Skefijnfiton in the yard
—
that; ,hf:, ward.' d .to shoot them. Witness
identrifiedpriso.ner as the officer who marie that
statement. J he accused Oidered portion of
the guard to go out with him. Tdaere were
even of them, and they were ail armed. Each
magazine of each man's rifle was charged.
Witness followed them into the yard.
THE SHOOTING.
The Prosecutor—When you got to the yard
what happened? Capt. Bowen-Colthurst told
the three prisoners to go to the farther end of
the yard, which they did. He then told all
the men to load—to pull off the catch and
pull out the bolt of their rifles. Then he told
them to "present" and to "fire." The three
prisoners, to my belief, were shot dead, sir.
One volley? One volley, sir-
Did you examine the three bodies? I went
up to them, and so far as I could see, and so
far as my judgment went, 1 took them all
three to be dead.
Did you see wounds on them? No, sir, but
I saw at the back of tho coat where the
bullets penetrated through.
Now what did Mr. Dobbin do? He stood
in the yard, and' at the time he thought there
was a movement in Sheehy Skeffington. He
went away and came back in about two
minutes, and another volley was fired by four
men at that one particular man.
What was you own impression? My own
impression was that the man was dead before
that volley was fired.
Cross-examined by Mr. Andrews—Witness
said his impression was that the three men
were killed the first time. It was the general
belief that there were not sufficient forces to
protect the barracks if an attack was made on
it.
By the President—No special orders were
given with regard to Mr. Sheehy-Skeffington
or anv of the prisoners. Mr. Skeffington was
kept in the guardroom, and Messrs. Dickson
and Maclntyre in the detention room. Wit-
ness was present when the accused gave the
order to the seven men to load and shoot the
three prisoners.
SECOND LIEUTENANT WILSON.
Second Lieut. L, Wilson. 5th R.I.F., attached
R.I.R., said that on the Tuesday night he was
with a parly of men, about forty, under Capt.
Bowen Colthurst. They had charge of Mr.
Sheehy Skeffington. who was taken as a
hostage, and went to " Kelly's Corner." Cant.
Colthurst left witness, twenty men, and Mr.
Skeffington on Portobello Bridge.
The Prosecutor—What orders did he give
you before he went? He said that if any of
his men were fired upon I was to shoot
Skeffington immediately, and if he (accused),
wore knocked out of action witness was to
take command. Witness understood the ac-
cused was going to raid Kelly's shop. Captain
Colthurst, came back with five prisoners, in-
cluding Messrs. Dickson and Maclntyre. Two'
prisoners were allowed to go away, and two
were taken into the guardroom.
MAJOR ROSBOROUGH.
Major.. James Rosborough, 3rd R.I.R.,
stated that he was temporarily in command at
Portobello Barracks during the rebellion.,
About three, hundred men were in barracks.
Witness saw the accused on the Wednesday
4. 105
morning. Captain Colthurst came to witness
as he was crossing the barrack square, and
said that he had just shot three prisoners, and
that he expected he would get into trouble
Accused did not say whether the prisoners
were military or civilian prisoners, but witness
presumed that they were civilians.
Cross-examined by Mr. Andrews, witness
said that they received a telephone communi-
cation from the garrison adjutant that an at-
tack might be made on the barracks. He con-
sidered that they should be prepared for an.
attack.
Were you aware that Skeffington had been
taken out by Capt. Colthurst? I did not know.
May I take it that to the best of your know-
ledge the taking of hostages in warfare or
rebellion is quite an obsolete practiced I
certainly would not do it.
The President—No reports were made to
you, as commanding officer, that there were
prisoners in the guardroom? No reports were
made to me.
You understand, I presume, that as com-
manding officer you are responsible for those
prisoners? Yes.
When did it come to your knowledge that
the accused took one of the prisoners out of
the guardroom? I heard that next day.
Did you take any action on that? I took
no particular action.
You, as commanding officer, being respon-
sible for the safe custody of prisoners, took
no notice whatever on hearing that one of
your prisoners had been removed without your
authority from the guardroom? What I
understand was that he was taken as a guide.
Witness said that the accused met him on
the barrack square at about 11 a.m. on April
26th.
Was the accused in an excited state at the
time? He was not in an abnormally excited
state.
Lieutenant Morgan, re-called, was asked by
the President—Did it come to your know-
ledge that the accused had taken out Skeffing-
ton with a body of men to the bridge? Yes.
When did you come to know that? That
night, about 10.40.
Did you make any report of that to your
commanding officer? Yes.
When? I reported it immediately when I
heard of it.
Can you tell us when Skeffington was
brought back to the guardroom that night?
I should say about 20 minutes past 11 o'clock.
Was any other prisoner taken out, to your
knowledge? No.
CHAPLAIN'S EVIDENCE.
Rev. F. E. O'Loughlin, R.C. Chaplain to
the military at Portobello Barracks, was the
next witness. He said he was at the barracks
on the 25th and 26th April. He knew
Skeffington, Dickson, and Maclntyre by ap-
Eearance. In consequence of a report which
e had received from the adjutant he went to
the mortuary, and there he saw the dead
bodies of the three men named. They were
buried at 11.15 on Wednesday night, and he
was present at their interment and subse-
quent exhumation.
PECULIAR INCIDENT.
Lieutenant Wilson was le-called for cross>-
examinatiori by Mr. Chambers.
You spoke of the night when Mr. Sheeny*
Skeffington was taken out as a hostage? Yea,
THE LATE MR. FRANCIS SHEEHY-
SKEFFINGTON was a well-known figure i«l
Dublin.
What was the condition of the accused on
that occasion? I considered that he wa3 in a
highly excited condition.
Do you remember any incident of a peculiar
nature occurring? Well, he ordered Mr.
Skeffington to say his prayers, and he mada
the men take off their hats.
5. 1C6
Did he say any prayer himself? He did.
What was it? As far as I can remember
it was as follows
—"0 Lorn God, if it should
please Thee to take away the life of this man,
forgive him for Our Lord Jesus Christ's sake."
The President—When was it that he
ordered him to say his prayers? Just outside
the guardroom, previous to his being taken
out as a hostage.
Sergeant James Geoghegan, R.A.M.C.. said
he went from the guardroom into the yard at
back, and found there three dead bodies which
he did not identify because he had not seen
them before. 'I he medical officer was not
called. He took the three bodies on a
stretcher and had them conveyed to the mor-
tuary.
Was there any blood there? Yes, there was
blood on their clothes.
Can you say from what you saw if the men
had been hit at all? Yes.
How? With bullets.
Whereabouts? In the body. 1 did not see
whether or not the bullets passed through the
bodies.
Did you form any opinion of how they died?
They died from the effects of bullet wounds.
Lieutenant Wilson was recalled.
Mr. Chambers—I forgot to ask yon whether
on the way down from Portobello Barracks to
Kelly's tobacco shop Capt. Colthurst did
anything with his rifle? Yes, he was firing
it "off.
In the air? Yes.
How often did he fire it off between the
barracks and Kelly's? Several times, sir.
The President—You mean that he was firing
indiscriminately, without taking aim? In the
air, sir.
LSEUTENANT MORRIS RECALLED.
Lieut. Monis was then recalled and ex-
amined by Mr. Andrews. —Do you lemember
on the Tuesday evening when* y a. were nro-
cted'ng wi'h the prison ei^Skeffington and
Capt. Colthurst in the direction of r^vtobello
Bridge? I had nothing to do with Capt.
Colthurst that evening in connection wit!; t!ie
prisoner. 1 saw Carit. Colthurst about mid-
night, when lie whs going from the barracks
with Mr. SkeffinKton. and lie was then pro-
ceeding to raid Kelly's tobacco si op. lie had
Mr. Sheehy Skeffington with him, and was in
a very excited condition indeed, and it : truck
me as very stupid of him to warn Sheehy
Skeffington that if he was fired on Sheehy
Skeffington would be shot at once. I did not
see how Sheehy Skeffington could, or anyone
conld, stop anyone from firing on the troops.
Did you consider Captain Colthurst to be
in an abnormal condition at the time? He
did not seem quite right in his he:.d at the
moment—he seemed to be labouring under
tremendous excitement.
When did you see him the nearest time
after the shooting took place? I saw him
when he announced t<> the Adjutant that he
had shot the prisoners. I was there when
he made the announcement. He seemed then
rather worse than the night before—he was
perfectly stupid.
Perfectly stupid? He was extremely
agitated and excited. I do not know Captain
Colthurst very well—indeed he did not strike
me at the time as a man who should be at
any time in command of troops.
Did he appear to you on these two
occasions to be in an entirely different frame
of mind from previous occasions? I had not
seen him previously, but T have seen him
since, and he was then totally different. Then
there was a third occasion when I saw him
—
that was in the officers' mess at tea time on
the same day—the Wednesday about 4.30 or
5 o'clock—1 am not quite certain. There
were several junior officers present. Most of
us were strangers to the barracks, and Cap-
tain Colthurst made a very ridiculous se
1
,
speech, indeed, as to Sir Francis Vane doing
all sorts of wicked things and being a Sinn
Feiner and a pro-Boer. On that occasion he
did not seem to be right in his head'.
Did he say anything else about Sir Francis
Vane? He said he should not be allowed in
the barracks, and that he should be shot.
I took it upon myself to tell the other officers
not to pay any attention to what Captain
Colthurst had said, and that I thought ha
was not quite himself at the time.
Did you consider he was in any way cap-
able of discriminating between legal right
and legal wrong? No, sir, I do not.
THE DEFENCE.
Mr. Chambers proceeded- to call his w'*l-
nesses. In reply to the President, he sa»J
that he would not call the accused, nor had
the accused any written statement to hand
in.
MAJOR-GENERAL BIRO.
Major-General Bird was questioned as to
the general character of the accused, and his
demeanour in 1914. Witness said that he
found him eccentric. Accused seemed to be
unable to concentrate his mind on a subject,
and was certainly at times eccentric. Apart from
that, he was a man of high character, and set
a very good example to everybody. The
accused took part in the battle of Mons, and
tiie morning alter the battle he was in charge
of the leading company of a battalion. Wit-
ness found that whenever he rode away from
the bead of the battalion it moved off. When
witness went back and asked why that
occurred nobody could tell him, but when he
turned his back he heard Captain Colthurst
giving an order in rather a weak voice for
the company to advance. Captain Colthurst's
reply and his demeanour convinced witness
that he was quite incapable of leading men,
and witness suspended him from duty for a
time. Accused was quite broken down, and
was not fit to exercise judgment. He was
wounded about a fortnight later at the Aisne.
Witness's opinion was that when unusually
fatigued and in a state of excitement Cap-
tain Colthurst was not quite responsible f
or
Ins actions.
Cross examined, witness said that in .April,
1914, he made a report about Captain
Colthurst. The report was over-ruled, and
witness had to tell him on one cccaaiea th<«^
6. 107
he would have to report unfavourably upon
him. On another occasion the accused bel-
lowed at him :
" Do you mean to say anything
against my company?" That was extraordi-
nary, and witness reprimanded him there and
then.
To the President—Witness reinstated Cap-
tain Colthurst in his old position of company
commander three or four days after he had
been removed from it. He attributed the
movement of the battalion after Mons to the
orders of Captain Colthurst.
MAJOR GOODMAN.
Major Goodman, stationed at the Curragh
Camp, examined by Mr. Andrews, said he had
known Captain Colthurst since November,
1904. Taking him generally, he was a kindly
and considerate man towards his fellow-officers
and the men under him. He had known him
occasionally to have done acts of an eccentric
character.
The President—Can you give us one in-
stance of the eccentric acts he did? Yes.
What is it? I had been on a shooting ex-
pedition with him in India, and we put up
for a night at a bungalow. There were dogs
barking all night, and we did not sleep. At
breakfast next morning I said I wished that
dog was shot that kept us awake. He got
up from the breakfast table without saying a
word to anyone, and went out. I heard a
rifle shot fired, and it was followed by the
piteous howling of a dog. Captain Colthurst
came back and said he had shot the dog. I
asked if he had killed the dog, and he said
" No "'
; and he added that the dog was
sufficiently wounded to die. I mention that
as an eccentric act, because it was entirely
against the nature of Captain Colthurst to
do that.
CAPTAIN E. P. KELLY.
Captain Edward Phillip Kelly, examined by
Mr. Chambers, K.C., M.P., stated that he
met Captain Bowen Colthurst for the first
time on Easter Monday at Portobello Bar-
racks. Witness thought his manner was
rather peculiar on the Monday and 'Tuesday.
On the Wednesday his manner seemed
strange. He was half lying a.cross the table
with his head rest'ng on his arm, and he
looked up occasionally and stared about the
room, and then fell forward again with his
head on his arm. Witness came to the con-
clusion then that he was off his head, and he
saw Capt. MeTurk and said' something to the
effect,
''
For Goodness sake, keep an eye on
Captain Colthurst; I think he is off his head."
CAPTAIN M'TURK, R.A.M.C.
Captain James MeTurk, R.A.M.C, stated,
b reply to Mr. Andrews, that he had known
"aptain Bowen-Colthurst for about ei<?ht
Months. Both as a medical man and one who
lad known him for nine months, witness
houcht he was net responsible for his action",
Hid was not crpa'ole r{ exercising any sound
judgment or discriminating between rMit
lad' wrong.
Cross-examined by the Prosecutor—Witness
had no special training in mental uiseases.
By the President—1 ru.ve been in Porto-
bello Barracks for nine months.
On the Wednesday, at lunch time, did you
think the accused was responsible for his
actions? I do not think so.
Can you give us any particular reasons for
stating that? His general demeanour at
lunch.
^
Did you report that to anyone? Well,
Captain Kelly reported it to me.
That is not the question I asked—you were
there as Medical Officer—the question is, did
you report this to anybody there? I re-
ported it to Captain Kelly. I told Captain
Kelly that I had prescribed ten grains of
potassium bromide for the accused.
Did you realise that it was your duty to
report an officer unfit for duty"? I reported
the matter to Captain Kelly.
At this time did he tell you that he had
been responsible for the shooting of three
men? He did not; he never said that.
Would you say his condition was due to
anxiety for what he had done? He said it
v. as a terrible thing to shoot one's own coun-
trymen.
DR. PARSONS.
Dr. Parsons, F.R.C.P., physician to the
Royal City of Dublin Hospital, gave evidence
that he met Captain Colthurst several years
ago, when he paid a professional visit. Wit-
ness saw trie accused on November 21st,
1914, when he had returned from the front,
and reported on his condition. There was
loss of power, owing to wounds, in accused's
left arm, and, in addition, Captain Colthurst
was in a condition of marked nervous exhaus-
tion. Witness reported that he was unfit for
duty ; should have two months' leave of
absence, and', after that, a period of light
duty. He was quite unequal to 'any strain,
which would probably have brought about a
nervous breakdown, probably affecting him
mentally. In February the accused had im-
proved physically, and" the rest had done his
mind good, but he was not fit for duty.
Witness last saw accused professionally the
previous Friday. He found him labouring under
cons :
derable excitement and restless. He
did not seem to realise his position in regard
to the present charge. In the course of a
long conversation accused talked about the
fighting at Mons and the retreat.
Did he make any reference to the shooting
incident? Yes, he told me that on Wednes-
day morning he went to bed at three and
read his Bible, and that he came across a
passage in it wheh seemed to have exercised
a very powerful influence on his mind. The
passage was to the effect: "And these my
enemies which will not have me to rule ever
them, bring them forth and slay them." So
far as I could gather from him the way that
affected his nrnd was that it was his duty
to slav men who would not have His Majesty
to rule over the-D.
Havmg regard to that and other parts of
7. 103
the conversation, did you form any opinion as
to the state of his mind? I came to the con-
clusion that his condition was far from
normal, and that he was unbalanced. I felt
that a very trivial incident at the time would
absolutely upset his balance.
Witness would not say that accused was
responsible for his actions in March, 1915.
The bearing of Captain Colthurst on the
Wednesday might be consonant with mani-
festations of remorse and regret on the part
of a sane man. Witness said that the accused
made 't quite clear to him -that he (accused)
had done right and carried out his duty. His
words were to the effect that in any other
country except Ireland it would be recog-
nised as right to kill rebels.
DR. LEEPER.
Dr. Leeper. F.R.C.S.I.. examined by Mr.
Andrews, said he held a certificate for know-
ledge of mental diseases, that he was medcal
superintendent of St. Patrick's Hospital,
Dublin, and late examiner in mental diseases
in the University of Duoln. He first saw
the accused on Friday last, in company with
Dt. Parsons, and listened to the conversation
which he had with Captain Colthurst. The
accused seemed to be in a very restless,
agitated state, pacing up and down the room,
and not able to control himself. He did not
appear to realise the seriousness of the
charge against him. or to have the ordinary
self-protect' ve feeling of a man against whom
there was a serious charge pending. He (wit-
ness) had come to the conclusion that the
man was exceedingly nervously shaken, and
that if his condition remained as it was, he
was on the "eve of a complete breakdown.
EVIDENCE AS TO CHARACTER.
Captain Wade Thompson. D.L. , Clons-
keagh Castle, was called, and stated that he
had known the accused for ten years. Dur-
ing that time he was one of his staunchest
friends, and he had found him an honourable,
straight-forward pentleman. He considered
him a little erratic in his manner at times.
and a little inconsequent in his conversation
occasionally. He was a straightforward,
kindly gentleman in every way, incapable of
anything dishonourable, under natural cir-
cumstances.
Colonel Sir Frederick W. Shaw described
the accused's character as of the very best.
He was not cruel or given to harsh acts.
Since Captain Colthurst's return from France
his mind was more unbalanced than before.
Lieutenant-Colonel Hamilton Bell and
Colonel J. S. Drown gave accused a high
character.
Major Eclrford said that he knew accused
best in India. He thought he was rattier gul-
lible us fur cis the men were concerned.
MEDICAL TESTIMONY.
Capt. George Lawless. Medical Superinten-
dent of the Armagh District Lunatic Asylum,
said, in reply to Mr. Chambers, that he had
examined the accused. His opinion was that
Capt. Colthurst was in a state of mental in-
stability, and that he was restless and un-
strung. His history for over a year was one
of mental weakness. Witness was a mem-
ber of a medical board before which Capt.
Colthurst presented himself in March, 1915.
A report was then made as to his mental
and bodily condition. Witness saw him again
the previous Saturday, when he was with him
for about two hours. The result of his ex-
amination was that he considered Captain
Colthurst was at present mentally in an un-
sound state, and that he was not responsible.
Major Francis Purser, who .had also
examined the accused, agreed with the evi-
dence given by Capt. Lawless.
TELEGRAM FROM SIR FRANCIS VANE.
The President said that before the Court
retired he should like to read the following
telegram which he had received from Major
Sir Francis Yane :
—
As Captain Colthurst's alleged speech ahoat
myself, as reported in papers, give false impres-
sion. I consider pnlilic announcement should he
made from Bench. Please note T was recommended
by Brigadier 178th brigade for mention in de-
spatches for work done in the rebellion, and for
re-organisins; defences Poriobrllo Barracks, but
did not sanction unnecessary harsh actions.
The Court then retired'.
FINDINGS OF THE COU RTMART! AL.
The finding of the General Courtmartial on
Captain Bowen-Colthurst, held at Richmond
Barracks on June 6th and 7th, 1916 was pro-
mulgated on Saturday. 10th June.
The Court found' ^nrtain Bowen Colthurst
guilty of the first third and fifth charges of
murder, and also found this officer was insane
at the time that he committed these acts.
1 he finding m* confirmed by the General
Officer Commanding-in-Chief.
TO BE DETAINED IN AN ASYLUM.
The following communiqui with reference to
the courtmartial on Captain Bowen Colthurst
was issued from the Military Headquarters
in Dublin on Thursday, 29th June :
—
The Army Council has notified that the
case of Captain J. C. Bowen Colthurst, who
was found guilty by courtmartial of the
murder of Sheehy-Skeffington, Thomas Dick-
son, and Patrick Maclntyre during the recent
rebellion, has been submitted to the King,
in accordance with Section 130 of the Aimy
Act, and His Majesty has been pleased to
direct that Captain Bowen Colthurst be de-
tained in a criminal lunatic asylum during His
Majesty's pleasure.