SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  8
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY




Dose-related Effect of Statins in Venous Thrombosis Risk
Reduction
Danai Khemasuwan, MD,a Young Kwang Chae, MD, MPH, MBA,a Shikha Gupta, MD,a Alejandra Carpio, MD,a
Jeong Hyun Yun, MD, MPH,a Stefan Neagu, MD,a Anabella B. Lucca, MD,a Matias E. Valsecchi, MD, MSc,b
Jorge I. Mora, MDc
a
  Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa; bDepartment of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson
University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa; cDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Albert Einstein Medical Center,
Philadelphia, Pa.



                   ABSTRACT

                  BACKGROUND: Atherosclerosis and venous thromboembolism share similar pathophysiology based on
                  common inflammatory mediators. The dose-related effect of statin therapy in venous thromboembolism
                  remains controversial. This study investigated whether the use of antiplatelet therapy and statins decrease
                  the occurrence of venous thromboembolism in patients with atherosclerosis.
                  METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study reviewing 1795 consecutive patients with athero-
                  sclerosis admitted to a teaching hospital between 2005 and 2010. Patients who had been treated with
                  anticoagulation therapy were excluded. Patients who either used statins for 2 months or never used them
                  were allocated to the nonuser group.
                  RESULTS: The final analysis included 1100 patients. The overall incidence of venous thromboembolism
                  was 9.7%. Among statin users, 6.3% (54/861) developed venous thromboembolism, compared with 22.2%
                  (53/239) in the nonuser group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.24; P .001). After controlling for confounding factors,
                  statin use was still associated with a lower risk of developing venous thromboembolism (HR 0.29;
                  P .001). High-dose statin use (average 50.9 mg/day) (HR 0.25; P .001) lowered the risk of venous
                  thromboembolism compared with standard-dose statins (average 22.2 mg/day) (HR 0.38; P .001). Dual
                  antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel decreased occurrence of venous thromboembolism (HR
                  0.19; P .001). Interestingly, combined statins and antiplatelet therapy further reduced the occurrence of
                  venous thromboembolism (HR 0.16; P .001).
                  CONCLUSIONS: The use of statins and antiplatelet therapy is associated with a significant reduction in the
                  occurrence of venous thromboembolism with a dose-related response of statins.
                  Published by Elsevier Inc. • The American Journal of Medicine (2011) 124, 852-859

                   KEYWORDS: Antiplatelet therapy; Atherosclerosis; Deep vein thrombosis; Pulmonary embolism; Statins; Venous
                   thromboembolism



The pathophysiology of venous thromboembolism was gen-                        port a new perspective on a possible common mechanism
erally considered to be different from that of thrombotic                     between venous thromboembolism and atherosclerotic dis-
atherosclerosis. However, there is growing evidence to sup-                   ease.1 The inflammatory cells present in the atherosclerotic
                                                                              plaques release cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8,
                                                                              and tumor necrosis factor alpha,2,3 which are essentially the
    Funding: None.
    Conflict of Interest: None of the authors has any conflict of interest to
                                                                              same inflammatory mediators that were found to be elevated
disclose.                                                                     in patients with venous thrombosis.4,5 A large population-
    Authorship: All authors meet criteria for authorship including access     based cohort also was supportive of the aforementioned
to the data, and all authors had a role in writing the manuscript.            hypothesis. This study assessed the risk of hospitalization
    Requests for reprints should be addressed to Danai Khemasuwan, MD,
Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
                                                                              due to myocardial infarction and stroke after the diagnosis
19141.                                                                        of venous thromboembolism. It showed convincing evi-
    E-mail address: danai_md@hotmail.com                                      dence that patients with diagnosis of deep venous thrombo-

0002-9343/$ -see front matter Published by Elsevier Inc.
doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.04.019
Khemasuwan et al     Statins for Venous Thrombosis Risk Reduction                                                           853

sis and pulmonary embolism had a significantly increased            2 months were relegated to the nonuser group. All patients
risk of subsequent cardiovascular events during a follow-up      included in the analysis had a minimum of 2 hospital visits.
period of up to 20 years.6 Conversely, patients with history        Patients who were taking oral anticoagulation on the first
of myocardial infarction or stroke had significantly in-          admission or who started them after the diagnosis of car-
creased risk for venous thromboembolism within 3 months          diovascular disease, were excluded. The outcome of the
after diagnosis.7 Additionally, a                                                           study focused on the occurrence
recent meta-analysis evaluating                                                             of venous thromboemblism,
the prevalence of major cardiovas-                                                          which consisted of deep vein
                                         CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
cular risk factors such as meta-                                                            thrombosis or pulmonary embo-
bolic syndrome and high serum            ● The use of statins reduced the risk of           lism, or both. Doppler ultrasound
level of low-density lipoprotein           subsequent venous thrombosis with a              with the criterion of venous com-
(LDL) in patients with venous              hazard ratio of 0.24 (P .001) com-               pressibility with transducer was
thromboembolism revealed that                                                               used to diagnose deep venous
                                           pared with non-statin users.
these were significantly increased                                                           thrombosis of femoral and popliteal
in patients with venous thrombo-         ● Statins may have an antithrombotic ef-           veins. Computed pulmonary an-
embolism.8-10 On the contrary,             fect in a dose-related manner. High-             giography with the presence of pul-
high serum levels of high-density          dose statin use lowered the risk of ve-          monary emboli or high probability
lipoprotein (HDL) were associ-             nous thromboembolism compared with               on ventilation-perfusion scan was
ated with a reduced risk of recur-         standard-dose statins.                           used to diagnose pulmonary
rent venous thromboembolism.11                                                              embolism.
These associations may suggest a         ● The combination of statins and anti-
clinical implication of antiplatelet       platelet therapy further reduced the oc-         Procedure
and lipid-lowering therapy (such           currence of venous thromboembolism.              All the data were collected from an
as statins) in venous thromboem-                                                            electronic medical record system.
bolism prevention.                                                                          Demographic data, the presence of
   Based on the currently avail-                                                            risk factors for atherosclerosis and
able data, we hypothesize that statins and antiplatelet ther-    venous thromboembolism were collected, including history
apy may have a role for venous thromboembolism preven-           of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity (body mass index
tion in patients at high risk for atherosclerotic disease.         30), smoking, cancer, metastatic cancer, immobilization,
Therefore, we conducted this study in order to explore the       use of estrogen hormone therapy or its derivatives, use of
association between the use of statins or antiplatelet therapy   statins including dosage and duration, use of aspirin, and
and the occurrence of venous thromboembolism among               use of clopidogrel. Patients with diagnosis of either a pul-
patients with history of atherosclerosis.                        monary embolism or a deep vein thrombosis were allocated
                                                                 in the venous thromboembolism group. Laboratory values
MATERIALS AND METHODS                                            that were recorded included serum LDL level, serum HDL
                                                                 level, and serum triglyceride.
Patients and Data Collection
                                                                    Statin dosage was collected from the medical reconcili-
This is a retrospective cohort study that was focused on
                                                                 ation form upon each admission for each patient. The dose
patients with established diagnosis of atherosclerosis, in-
                                                                 classification of statins was based on the potency of each
cluding ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction. The di-
                                                                 statin on the standard conversion chart.12 As a result, stan-
agnosis of transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke was
                                                                 dard-dose usage of statins was defined as daily statin use of
made by a history of sudden-onset, focal or global neuro-
                                                                   80 mg of fluvastatin or pravastatin, and 40 mg of lova-
logical deficits, which were confirmed when possible by
                                                                 statin, simvastatin, or atorvastatin, and 10 mg of rosuv-
computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging
scans. Myocardial infarction was determined by clinical          astatin. On the other hand, high-dose usage of statins was
presentation of angina pectoris with either elevation of tro-    defined as daily statin use 10 mg of rosuvastatin, and 40
ponin I or electrocardiogram changes. All the patients with      mg of lovastatin, simvastatin, or atorvastatin.
diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases admitted at Albert Ein-
stein Medical Center between November 2005 and January             Statistical Analysis
2010 were eligible for the study. The duration of statin use       This study was a retrospective, cohort study designed to
and antiplatelet therapy, including aspirin and clopidogrel,       determine occurrence of venous thromboembolism in pa-
was recorded. Statin use included: atorvastatin, simvastatin,      tients with atherosclerotic disease. For the analysis of the
rosuvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, and fluvastatin. Statin      primary cohort, adjustments were made for age and sex. The
dosage was calculated as an average dose per day over the          comparative risk for venous thromboembolism between
observation period. The cardiovascular risk factors and pos-       each group was expressed as the adjusted hazard ratio (HR)
sible risk factors for venous thromboembolism were re-             along with its 95% confidence interval (CI). Baseline char-
corded. Patients who never used statins or had used them for       acteristics were compared within each group using either an
854                                                         The American Journal of Medicine, Vol 124, No 9, September 2011

analysis of variance for continuous variables or the chi-




                                                                                                                                                                                            P-Value




                                                                                                                                                                                                      .009
squared test for categorical data. All the P values were




                                                                                                                                                                                                      .99
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .49
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .34
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .23
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .66

                                                                                                                                                                                                      .22
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .44
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .02
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .77
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .16
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .06
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .68
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .16
2-sided with a level of .05 for statistical significance. The
univariate relationship between use of statins or antiplatelet




                                                                                                                                                                                                        578 (49.8%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                        838 (76.3%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                      1,015 (92.3%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                        350 (31.8%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                        183 (16.6%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                        249 (22.6%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                        266 (24.2%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                        238 (21.6%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                        496 (45.1%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                        728 (66.2%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                        572 (52%)




                                                                                                                                                                                                         45 (4%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                         10 (1%)
therapy and the occurrence of venous thromboembolism




                                                                                                                                                                                       n 1100
were assessed. Multivariate Cox regression was used to




                                                                                                                                                                                       Total


                                                                                                                                                                                                      67.3
control for all other potential confounding variables, includ-
ing diabetes mellitus, obesity (body mass index 30),
smoking, cancer, metastatic cancer, immobilization, and use




                                                                                                                                                                                                      48 (53.3%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      68 (75.6%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      42 (46.7%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                      23 (25.6%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      19 (21.1%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      15 (16.6%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      23 (25.5%)


                                                                                                                                                                                                      14 (15.6%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      40 (44.4%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      81 (90%)




                                                                                                                                                                                                      18 (20%)


                                                                                                                                                                                                      54 (60%)
of estrogen hormone or its derivatives. We performed in-




                                                                                                                                                                                       Nonuser




                                                                                                                                                                                                       0 (0%)
                                                                                                                                                                                       n 88
teraction analysis by using Wald test and likelihood ratio




                                                                                                                                                                                                      67.7
test. For all statistical analyses, we used STATA, version 9
(StataCorp LP, College Station, Tex).




                                                                                                                                                                                                      258 (51.3%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      393 (78.1%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      262 (52.1%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      463 (92.1%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      140 (27.8%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                       87 (17.3%)




                                                                                                                                                                                                      120 (23.8%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                       97 (19.3%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      236 (46.9%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      323 (64.2%)
                                                                                                                                                                                   Aspirin Use




                                                                                                                                                                                                       24 (4.7%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                         5(1.9%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      131 (26%)
                                                                                                                                                                                   n 503
RESULTS




                                                                                                                                                                                                      69.1
                                                                                                                                                                                   Only
Over the study period, 1795 consecutive patients with the
diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases were identified. Among
this group, patients who had been treated with anticoagulation




                                                                                                                                                                                   Clopidogrel




                                                                                                                                                                                                      40 (61.5%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      44 (67.8%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      41 (63.1%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      62 (95.4%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      22 (33.8%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      14 (21.5%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                      16 (24.6%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                      10 (15.4%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                      30 (46.2%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      42 (64.6%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                       1 (1.5%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                       1(1.5%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                      15 (23%)
                                                                                                                                                                                   Use Only
therapy (oral warfarin or therapeutic dosage of intravenous




                                                                                                                                                                                   n 66

                                                                                                                                                                                                      66.67
heparin) before their first admission or who had received

                                                                      Demographic Data and Factors Related to VTE with the Use of Statins and the Use of Antiplatelet Therapy
anticoagulation therapy after the diagnosis of cardiovascular
diseases, were excluded (n 208). Also, patients who had




                                                                                                                                                                                                      230 (52.5%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      333 (75.3%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      227 (51.4%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      409 (92.5%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      165 (37.3%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                       63 (14.3%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                       79 (17.9%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                      118 (26.7%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      112 (25.3%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                      309 (69.9%)
                                                                                                                                                                                Antiplatelet




                                                                                                                                                                                                       15 (3.4%)
a single hospital visit were excluded (n        487). This re-




                                                                                                                                                                                                      190 (43%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                        4 (9%)
                                                                                                                                                                                n 443
                                                                                                                                                                                Therapy
sulted in a total of 1100 patients in the final analysis.


                                                                                                                                                                                                      65.2
                                                                                                                                                                                Dual

    Characteristics of the 1100 patients are shown in Table 1.
The mean age of the study sample was 67.3 years; 49.8% of




                                                                                                                                                                                                                               triglyceride.
the patients were female; and 76% were African American.
                                                                                                                                                                                            P-Value


The overall incidence of venous thromboembolism was
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .062


                                                                                                                                                                                                      .003
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .003
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .35


                                                                                                                                                                                                      .05
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .01
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .03
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .09

                                                                                                                                                                                                      .39
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .51
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .28
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .29
9.7% (n 107); 78.3% (n 861) were using statins during
                                                                                                                                                                                                      .7




                                                                                                                                                                                                      .5
the follow-up period. The P-value in Table 1 was derived




                                                                                                                                                                                                                               low-density lipoprotein; TG
                                                                                                                                                                                                        578 (49.8%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                        838 (76.3%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                      1,015 (92.3%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                        350 (31.8%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                        183 (16.6%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                        249 (22.6%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                        266 (24.2%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                        238 (21.6%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                        496 (45.1%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                        728 (66.2%)
from analysis of variance test. The distribution of the statins
                                                                                                                                                                                                        572 (52%)




                                                                                                                                                                                                         45 (4%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                         10 (1%)
                                                                                                                                                                                       n 1100




use is listed in Table 2. Univariate analysis demonstrated
that having a history of diabetes, hypertension, cancer, cur-
                                                                                                                                                                                       Total


                                                                                                                                                                                                      67.3




rent smoking, high-serum triglyceride, high-serum LDL,
and low HDL did not affect the occurrence of venous
                                                                                                                                                                                                      121 (50.7%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      176 (73.6%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      104 (43.5%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                       68 (28.5%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                       49 (20.5%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                       66 (27.6%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                       52 (21.8%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                       45 (18.8%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      107 (44.7%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      152 (63.6%)
thromboembolism during the follow-up period. Metastatic
                                                                                                                                                                                                       16 (6.7%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                        3 (1.3%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      208 (87%)
                                                                                                                                                                                       n 239




cancer, immobilization, hormonal use, and obesity statisti-
                                                                                                                                                                                       Nonuser




cally increased the risk of developing venous thromboem-
                                                                                                                                                                                                      69.1




bolism (HR 2.37, 95% CI, 1.2-4.71; HR 2.0, 95% CI,                                                                                                                                                                             high-density lipoprotein; LDL
1.35-2.98; HR 3.25, 95% CI, 1.03-10.25; HR 1.54, 95% CI,
                                                                                                                                                                                   Standard-dose




1.05-2.29, respectively). Use of statins and use of antiplate-
                                                                                                                                                                                                      256 (78.3%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      190 (58.1%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      308 (94.2%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                       93 (28.4%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                       63 (19.3%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                       74 (22.6%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                       87 (26.6%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                       67 (21.4%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      130 (41.5%)
                                                                                                                                                                                   Statins User




                                                                                                                                                                                                       16 (4.9%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                        4 (1.2%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      170 (52%)




                                                                                                                                                                                                      219 (70%)




let therapy were related to a reduced occurrence of devel-
                                                                                                                                                                                   n 327




oping venous thromboembolism (HR 0.24, 95% CI, 0.17-
                                                                                                                                                                                                      67.9




0.36; HR 0.32, 95% CI, 0.19-0.52, respectively) (Table 3).
                                                                                                                                                                                                      406 (76.03%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      287 (53.7%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                      278 (52.1%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      499 (93.5%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      189 (35.4%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                       71 (13.3%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                      109 (20.4%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                      127 (23.8%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      126 (22.9%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      259 (47.3%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      357 (65.1%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                       13 (2.4%)

                                                                                                                                                                                                        3 (0.5%)




Statins
                                                                                                                                                                                High-dose


                                                                                                                                                                                n 534
                                                                                                                                                                                Statins




The average duration of the follow-up period in the statin
                                                                                                                                                                                                                               body mass index; HDL
                                                                                                                                                                                                      66.1
                                                                                                                                                                                User




user group was 13.4 months (range 2-56 months). Among
statins users, a majority of patients (62.1%) were taking
high dosages of statins ( 10 mg of rosuvastatin, and 40
                                                                                                                                                                                                      Race, African American




mg of lovastatin, simvastatin, or atorvastatin). An average
                                                                                                                                                                                                      HDL( 40 M/ 50 F)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      Obesity (BMI 30)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      Metastatic cancer




dose of statins in this group was 50.9 mg/day. On the other
                                                                                                                                                                                                      Immobilization
                                                                                                                                                                                                      Hormonal use




hand, 327 patients (37.9%) took standard dosages of statins
                                                                                                                                                                                                      Hypertension




                                                                                                                                                                                                      LDL ( 100)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      Sex, female




                                                                                                                                                                                                      TG ( 150)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      Age, years
                                                                      Table 1




( 80 mg of fluvastatin, pravastatin, 40 mg of lovastatin,
                                                                                                                                                                                                                               BMI
                                                                                                                                                                                                      Diabetes

                                                                                                                                                                                                      Smoking
                                                                                                                                                                                                      Cancer




simvastatin, or atorvastatin, and 10 mg of rosuvastatin).
An average dose of statins in this group was 22.2 mg/day.
Khemasuwan et al         Statins for Venous Thrombosis Risk Reduction                                                                   855

                       Table 2 Summary of Different Types of Statin Therapy and the Risk of Venous
                       Thromboembolism
                                                   Standard Dose       High Dose       Total Number      Number of VTE
                                                   n 327               n 534           of Patients       Occurrence
                       Type of Statins Used        (37.9%)             (62.1%)         n 861             n 54
                       Atorvastatin                191                 368             559               29
                       Simvastatin                 101                 138             239               20
                       Lovastatin                   11                  20              31                3
                       Rosuvastatin                  0                   8               8                0
                       Pravastatin                  18                   0              18                2
                       Fluvastatin                   6                   0               6                0
                          VTE      venous thromboembolism.




The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that statin use was                       apy, which is either aspirin or clopidogrel, and dual anti-
associated with a lower risk of developing venous throm-                     platelet therapy, is shown in Figure 3.
boembolism (log rank test P-value .001; Figure 1). Fur-
thermore, high-dose statin use appears to be related to lower                Multivariate Cox Regression Analysis
occurrence of venous thromboembolism compared with                           A multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusting for known
standard-dose statins use (Figure 2).                                        risk factors for venous thromboembolism, including those
                                                                             factors that were statistically significant in the univariate
Antiplatelet Therapy                                                         regression analysis and have been shown to be related to an
The average duration of the follow-up period of antiplatelet                 occurrence of venous thromboembolism (metastatic cancer,
therapy users was 13.48 months in the aspirin-user group                     immobilization, hormonal use, and obesity), as well as the
(range 2-78 months), and 13.53 months for the clopidogrel-                   use of statins and use of antiplatelet therapy, was performed.
user group (range 1-48 months). The Kaplan-Meier plots                       The increase in occurrence of venous thromboembolism
showing the occurrence of venous thromboembolism, com-                       persisted for immobilization and obesity (HR 1.83, 95% CI,
pared between nonantiplatelet user, single antiplatelet ther-                1.22-2.76 and HR 1.64, 95% CI, 1.09-2.45, respectively).
                                                                             Interestingly, statin use continued to be related to a reduc-
                                                                             tion in the occurrence of venous thromboembolism (HR
                                                                             0.29, 95% CI, 0.19-0.44), possibly in a dose-related manner,
Table 3 Univariate Cox Regression Analysis of Factors
                                                                             in standard-dose statin users (HR 0.38, 95% CI, 0.24-0.6)
Related to Venous Thromboembolism and Occurrence of Venous
                                                                             and in high-dose statin users (HR 0.25, 95% CI, 0.15-0.4).
Thromboembolism
                                                                             In addition to statins, antiplatelet therapy also was related to
Factors                     HR            95% CI             P-Value         a reduction in the occurrence of venous thromboembolism
Diabetes                    1.00          0.68–1.46           .99
Hypertension                2.92          0.92–9.22           .07
Smoking                     0.72          0.47–1.10           .13
Cancer                      1.41          0.88–2.26           .15
Metastatic cancer           2.37          1.20–4.71           .013
Immobilization              2.00          1.35–2.98           .001
Hormonal use                3.25          1.03–10.25          .04
Obesity (BMI 30)            1.54          1.05–2.29           .03
Hyper TG                    0.7           0.42–1.76           .18
High LDL                    1.32          0.91–1.93           .15
Low HDL                     1.05           0.7–1.57           .23
Statins                     0.24          0.17–0.36           .001
   Regular dose             0.31          0.20–0.49           .001
   High dose                0.16          0.09–0.27           .001
Antiplatelet                0.32          0.19–0.52           .001
   Aspirin only             0.47          0.28–0.79           .004
   Clopidogrel only         0.30          0.11–0.82           .019
   Dual antiplatelet        0.19          0.10–0.34           .001
   BMI      body mass index; CI   confidence interval; HDL   high-
                                                                              Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier plot showing the occurrence of ve-
density lipoprotein; HR hazard ratio; LDL low-density lipoprotein;            nous thromboembolism compared between statin use and non-
TG triglyceride.                                                              statin use.
856                                                         The American Journal of Medicine, Vol 124, No 9, September 2011




                          Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier plot showing the occurrence of venous thromboembo-
                          lism compared between nonstatin use, standard-dose statin use, and high-dose
                          statin use.



(HR 0.47, 95% CI, 0.28-0.79 with aspirin use only; HR 0.3,           Additive Effect of Statins and Antiplatelet
95% CI, 0.11-0.82 with clopidogrel use only; and HR 0.19,            Therapy
95% CI, 0.1-0.34 with dual antiplatelet therapy) (Table 4).
Multivariate logistic regression, when performed, showed             In addition to isolated protective effect against venous
similar results with the multivariate Cox regression. When           thromboembolism of statins and antiplatelet therapy, our
controlled for the same multiple risk factors, statin use and        study also showed a possible additive effect of combined
antiplatelet agent use were associated with reduced risk of          statin and antiplatelet therapy. The Kaplan-Meier analysis
venous thromboembolism (statins: odds ratio [OR] 0.30,               revealed that combined statin and antiplatelet therapy was
P .001; antiplatelet agent: OR 0.44, P .007). High-dose              associated with a lower risk of developing venous throm-
statin use showed lower risk compared with standard-dose             boembolism (log rank test P-value .001; Figure 4). In a
statin use (high dose: OR 0.21, P .001; standard dose: OR            multivariate Cox regression model, combined statin use and
0.42, P .001) (data not shown).                                      antiplatelet therapy reduced the occurrence of venous




                          Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier plot showing the occurrence of venous thromboembo-
                          lism compared between nonantiplatelet use, single antiplatelet therapy, and dual
                          antiplatelet therapy.
Khemasuwan et al        Statins for Venous Thrombosis Risk Reduction                                                              857

Table 4 Multivariate Cox Regression Analysis of Factors
                                                                          flammatory effect, with significant decrease in high sensi-
Related to Venous Thromboembolism and Occurrence of Venous                tive C-reactive protein levels at 8 weeks of study period
Thromboembolism                                                           compared with placebo.13 Statins also can exhibit anti-
                                                                          thrombotic properties and alter coagulation cascades
Factors                     HR             95% CI             P-Value     through various mechanisms, which are not associated with
Metastatic cancer           2.24           0.93–5.44             .07      changes in cholesterol profiles.14-16
Immobilization              1.83           1.22–2.76             .004        The evidence of use of antiplatelet therapy in venous
Hormonal use                2.35           0.68–8.11             .18      thromboembolism prevention is still controversial. A meta-
Obesity (BMI 30)            1.64           1.09–2.45             .02      analysis on short-term antiplatelet therapy in patients with
Statins                     0.29           0.19–0.44             .001     cardiovascular risk factors showed a significant reduction in
   Regular dose             0.38           0.24–0.6              .001
                                                                          the risk of fatal or nonfatal pulmonary embolism with the
   High dose                0.25           0.15–0.4              .001
Antiplatelet                0.43           0.25–0.72             .001     odds reduction of 25%.17 However, a randomized trial of
   Aspirin only             0.47           0.28–0.79             .004     healthy women revealed no supporting evidence of aspirin
   Clopidogrel only         0.30           0.11–0.82             .02      use in long-term prevention of venous thromboembolism.18
   Dual antiplatelet        0.19           0.10–0.34             .001     Clinical trials have shown the benefit of clopidogrel in
    BMI   body mass index; CI    confidence interval; HR   hazard ratio.   prevention of atherosclerosis, more specifically, in acute
                                                                          coronary syndrome and post-drug-eluting stent placement in
                                                                          myocardial infarction, being used either as combined mono-
                                                                          therapy or in combination with aspirin.19,20 However, the
thromboembolism (HR 0.16; 95% CI, 0.09-0.31, P-value                      evidence on the clopidogrel use in venous thromboembo-
   .001).                                                                 lism prophylaxis is still inconclusive.
    Interaction analysis was performed to identify the poten-                In our study, history of metastatic cancer, immobiliza-
tial interaction between statin and antiplatelet therapy on the           tion, hormonal use, and obesity were related to increased
occurrence of venous thromboembolism, which revealed no
                                                                          occurrence of venous thromboembolism. These risk factors
statistically significant interaction between the statin use
                                                                          are well-studied risk factors for venous thromboembolism
and the antiplatelet use (Wald test P .40).
                                                                          in the general population.21 We found an association be-
                                                                          tween statin use and decreased occurrence of venous throm-
DISCUSSION                                                                bosis in our study population, as previously supported by
Statins are currently considered the most effective choles-               several retrospective and prospective studies.22-26 A recent
terol-lowering drugs available. In addition to lipid-lowering             retrospective study of hospitalized cancer patients with in-
effects, statins also exert anti-inflammatory effects, reduc-              herently high risk for venous thromboembolism showed that
ing serum inflammatory markers and enhancing vascular                      the use of statins was associated with a reduction in the
endothelial function. Simvastatin showed a direct anti-in-                occurrence of venous thromboembolism.27




                                Figure 4 Kaplan-Meier plot showing the occurrence of venous thromboembo-
                                lism compared between combined statin and antiplatelet therapy, either use of
                                statin and antiplatelet therapy, and nonuser.
858                                                        The American Journal of Medicine, Vol 124, No 9, September 2011

    Furthermore, a recent randomized control trial (the              Focusing on the additive effect of statin use and anti-
JUPITER study) in healthy adults demonstrated the efficacy         platelet therapy on subsequent venous thromboembolism,
of rosuvastatin in the reduction of high-sensitive C-reactive     our study indicates that the highest protective effect was
protein levels by 37% after a median follow-up of 1.9             seen with combined statins use and antiplatelet therapy.
years.28 These anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic prop-          There is a theoretically attractive possibility that the com-
erties of statins may have clinical implication in venous         bination therapy of atrovastatin and aspirin reduced platelet
thromboembolism prevention among patients with athero-            thromboxane A-2 in platelet aggregation process.37 This
sclerotic disease. A large randomized controlled trial in a       mechanism may play an important role in arterial and ve-
healthy population demonstrated that rosuvastatin was sig-        nous thrombosis. Therefore, this theory needs further inves-
nificantly associated with decreased occurrence of symp-           tigation in a randomized controlled trial, evaluating the
tomatic venous thromboembolism compared with pla-                 effect of statins and antiplatelet combination therapy in
cebo.29 A recent meta-analysis concluded that statins may         patients at high risk of venous thromboembolism.
lower the risk of venous thromboembolism.30 However, the
randomized controlled trials in this meta-analysis had ve-        Strengths and Limitations
nous thromboembolism as a secondary outcome. Based on             Several points should be included in consideration of the
this limitation, its results should be cautiously interpreted.    interpretation of our study. Our study would be the first to
    Our study results suggest that statin use in patients with    exhibit the possible dose-related relationship of statins in
cardiovascular disease decreases the occurrence of venous         the prevention of venous thromboembolism. An innate lim-
thromboembolism in this study population in a dose-related        itation is that ours is a retrospective study. There are pos-
manner. A meta-analysis on the effect of statins on cardio-       sible confounding factors that may not have been included
vascular outcomes demonstrated that the use of high-dose          in the analysis. Moreover, our data do not include other
statins provides better outcomes over standard-dose therapy       serum markers of inflammation besides high-sensitive C-re-
for preventing nonfatal cardiovascular events.31 To our           active protein, which may be explained by the protective
knowledge, ours is the first study to exhibit the possible         effect of statins against the occurrence of venous thrombo-
dose-related relationship in terms of prevention for venous       embolism. Lastly, in our study, we used medical reconcili-
thromboembolism in a population with cardiovascular               ation forms to assess medication adherence of the subjects.
disease.                                                          These forms were designed to record every subject’s med-
    Our study also included the serum lipid profiles, includ-      ication list from each hospital visit. Thus, we assumed that
ing serum triglyceride, serum HDL, and serum LDL in the           the subjects complied with their medications in the fol-
initial univariate analysis. We did not find any relationship      low-up period. These limitations should be taken into con-
between abnormalities of these lipid profiles and the subse-       sideration and need to be addressed in future studies.
quent development of venous thromboembolism. These
findings are consistent with other prospective studies of risk
                                                                  CONCLUSIONS
factors for venous thromboembolism, which have shown no
                                                                  Our study suggests a possible protective effect of statins
association between lipid profile and subsequent venous
                                                                  therapy used as a single agent with a possible dose-related
thromboembolism.32-34 It is reasonable to postulate that the
                                                                  response, or in combination with antiplatelet therapy. This
protective effect of statins on venous thromboembolism is
                                                                  protective effect seems to be independent of the other ve-
possibly through non-lipid-lowering properties or pleiotro-
                                                                  nous thromboembolism risk factors, including history of
pic effects of statins.                                           metastatic cancer, immobilization, hormonal use, and obe-
    Regarding antiplatelet therapy, our study showed the          sity. Prospective, randomized control trials cautiously in-
benefit of both aspirin and clopidogrel on the occurrence of       vestigating the suggested pleiotropic effect of statins are
venous thromboembolism. Interestingly, dual antiplatelet          warranted.
therapy exerts a better outcome on subsequent venous
thromboembolism compared with single antiplatelet therapy
in this study population. Szczeklik et al35 suggested that
aspirin impaired thrombin formation in both in vitro and ex
vivo models by acetylating prothrombin or macromolecules          ACKNOWLEDGMENT
of platelet membrane. Our finding contradicts a randomized         This study was approved by Institutional Review Board
trial of healthy women that showed no clear benefit of             (IRB) at Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
aspirin in terms of long-term prevention of venous throm-         (IRB number – EX-579, Albert Einstein Medical Center).
boembolism.36 As for clopidogrel, there are no recent stud-
ies addressing the potential benefit of this drug on the           References
occurrence of venous thromboembolism. The possible im-             1. Piazza G, Goldhaber SZ. Venous thromboembolism and atherothrom-
                                                                      bosis: an integrated approach. Circulation. 2010;121:2146-2150.
plication of dual antiplatelet therapy on the occurrence of        2. Rus HG, Vlaicu R, Niculescu F. Interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 pro-
venous thromboembolism warrants further prospective                   tein and gene expression in human arterial atherosclerotic wall. Ath-
studies.                                                              erosclerosis. 1996;127:263-271.
Khemasuwan et al          Statins for Venous Thrombosis Risk Reduction                                                                               859

 3. Rus HG, Niculescu F, Vlaicu R. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha in human       20. Eisenstein EL, Anstrom KJ, Kong DF, et al. Clopidogrel and long-term
    arterial wall with atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 1991;89:247-254.         outcomes after drug-elution stent implantation. JAMA. 2007;297:159-
 4. van Aken BE, Reitsma PH, Rosendaal FR. Interleukin 8 and venous               168.
    thrombosis: evidence for a role of inflammation in thrombosis. Br J        21. Anderson FA Jr, Spencer FA. Risk factors for venous thromboembo-
    Haematol. 2002;116:173-177.                                                   lism. Circulation. 2003;107(23 Suppl 1):I9-I16.
 5. van Aken BE, den Heijer M, Bos GM, et al. Recurrent venous throm-         22. Lacut K, Oger E, Le Gal G, et al. Statins but not fibrates are associated
    bosis and markers of inflammation. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83:536-                with a reduced risk of venous thromboembolism: a hospital-based
    539.                                                                          case-control study. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2004;18:477-482.
 6. Sørensen HT, Horvath-Puho E, Pedersen L, et al. Venous thrombo-           23. Yang CC, Jick SS, Jick H. Statins and the risk of idiopathic venous
    embolism and subsequent hospitalization due to acute arterial cardio-         thromboembolism. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;53:101-105.
    vascular events: a 20-year cohort study. Lancet. 2007;370:1773-1779.      24. Ray JG, Mamdani M, Tsuyuki RT, Anderson DR, Yeo EL, Laupacis
 7. Sorensen HT, Horvath-Puho E, Sogaard KK, et al. Arterial cardiovas-           A. Use of statins and the subsequent development of deep vein throm-
    cular events, statins, low-dose aspirin and subsequent risk of venous         bosis. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1405-1410.
    thromboembolism: a population-based case-control study. J Thromb          25. Ramcharan AS, Van Stralen KJ, Snoep JD, et al. HMG-CoA reductase
    Haemost. 2009;7:521-528.                                                      inhibitors, other lipid-lowering medication, antiplatelet therapy, and
 8. Ageno W, Becattini C, Brighton T, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors          the risk of venous thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7:514-520.
    and venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis. Circulation. 2008;           26. Herrington DM, Vittinghoff E, Lin F, et al. Statin therapy, cardiovas-
    117:93-102.                                                                   cular events, and total mortality in the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin
 9. Ageno W, Prandoni P, Romualdi E, et al. The metabolic syndrome and            Replacement Study (HERS). Circulation. 2002;105:2962-2967.
    the risk of venous thrombosis: a case-control study. J Thromb Hae-        27. Khemasuwan D, Divietro ML, Tangdhanakanond K, et al. Statins
                                                                                  decrease the occurrence of venous thromboembolism in patients with
    most. 2006;4:1914-1918.
                                                                                  cancer. Am J Med. 2010;123:60-65.
10. Sofi F, Marcucci R, Abbate R, et al. Lipoprotein (a) and venous
                                                                              28. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent
    thromboembolism in adults: a meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2007;120:
                                                                                  vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein.
    728-733.
                                                                                  N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195-2207.
11. Eichinger S, Pecheniuk NM, Hron G, et al. High-density lipoprotein
                                                                              29. Glynn RJ, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, et al. A randomized trial of
    and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2007;
                                                                                  rosuvastatin in the prevention of venous thromboembolism. N Engl
    115:1609-1614.
                                                                                  J Med. 2009;360:1851-1861.
12. Weng TC, Yang YH, Lin SJ, et al. A systematic review and meta-
                                                                              30. Squizzato A, Galli M, Romualdi E, et al. Statins, fibrates, and venous
    analysis on the therapeutic equivalence of statins. J Clin Pharm Ther.
                                                                                  thromboembolism: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:1248-1256.
    2010;35:139-151.
                                                                              31. Cannon CP, Steinberg BA, Murphy SA, et al. Meta-analysis of car-
13. Devaraj S, Chan E, Jialal I, et al. Direct demonstration of anti-             diovascular outcomes trials comparing intensive versus moderate sta-
    inflammatory effect of simvastatin in subjects with the metabolic              tin therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:438-445.
    syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:4489-4496.                     32. Holst AG, Jensen G, Prescott E. Risk factors for venous thromboem-
14. Undas A, Brummel-Ziedins KE, Mann KG. Statins and blood coagu-                bolism: results from the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Circulation.
    lation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:287-294.                       2010;121:1896-1903.
15. Takemoto M, Liao JK. Pleiotropic effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglu-        33. Mahmoodi BK, Gansevoort RT, Veeger NJGM, et al; Prevention of
    taryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol.         Renal and Vascular End-stage Disease (PREVEND) Study Group.
    2001;21:1712-1719.                                                            Microalbuminuria and risk of venous thromboembolism. JAMA. 2009;
16. Krysiak R, Okopien B, Herman ZS. Effects of HMG-CoA reductase
                         ´                                                        301:1790-1797.
    inhibitors on coagulation and fibrinolysis processes. Drugs. 2003;63:      34. Chamberlain AM, Folsom AR, Heckbert SR, Rosamond WD, Cush-
    1821-1854.                                                                    man M. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and venous thromboem-
17. Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration. Collaborative meta-analysis          bolism in the Longitudinal Investigation of Thromboembolism Etiol-
    of randomized trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death,         ogy (LITE). Blood. 2008;112:2675-2680.
    myocardial infarction, and stroke in high-risk patients. BMJ. 2002;       35. Szczeklik A, Krzanowski M, Góra P, et al. Antiplatelet drugs and
    324:71-86.                                                                    generation of thrombin in clotting blood. Blood. 1992;80:2006-2011.
18. Glynn RJ, Ridker PM, Goldhaber SZ, et al. Effect of low-dose aspirin      36. Glynn RJ, Ridker PM, Goldhaber SZ, et al. Effect of low-dose aspirin
    on the occurrence of venous thromboembolism: a randomized trial.              on the occurrence of venous thromboembolism: a randomized trial.
    Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:525-533.                                             Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:525-533.
19. Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to   37. Santos MT, Fuset MP, Ruano M, et al. Effect of Atorvastatin on
    aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment          platelet thromboxane A(2) synthesis in aspirin-treated patients with
    elevation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:494-502.                                    acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104:1618-1623.

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Cuando empeza y cuando parar la profilaxis
Cuando empeza y cuando parar la profilaxisCuando empeza y cuando parar la profilaxis
Cuando empeza y cuando parar la profilaxisAnderson David
 
Clinical and haemodynamic evaluation of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hype...
Clinical and haemodynamic evaluation of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hype...Clinical and haemodynamic evaluation of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hype...
Clinical and haemodynamic evaluation of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hype...Dra. Mônica Lapa
 
ITP ASH Guideline
ITP ASH GuidelineITP ASH Guideline
ITP ASH Guidelineseayat1103
 
A Complete & Effective Study Of Venous Thromboembolism
A Complete & Effective Study Of Venous ThromboembolismA Complete & Effective Study Of Venous Thromboembolism
A Complete & Effective Study Of Venous ThromboembolismMedical and Health
 
The Coagulopathy of Trauma: A Review of Mechanisms
The Coagulopathy of Trauma: A Review of MechanismsThe Coagulopathy of Trauma: A Review of Mechanisms
The Coagulopathy of Trauma: A Review of MechanismsEmergency Live
 
Post covid anticoagulant role
Post covid anticoagulant rolePost covid anticoagulant role
Post covid anticoagulant roleTarekHamdy17
 
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE): Recent Advances in Reducing the Disease Burden
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE): Recent Advances in Reducing the Disease BurdenVenous Thromboembolism (VTE): Recent Advances in Reducing the Disease Burden
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE): Recent Advances in Reducing the Disease BurdenNBCA
 
Massive bleeding, are doing our best? m. marietta
Massive bleeding, are doing our best?  m. mariettaMassive bleeding, are doing our best?  m. marietta
Massive bleeding, are doing our best? m. mariettaanemo_site
 
CLOT Team Treatment of Sub-Massive and Massive PE
CLOT Team Treatment of Sub-Massive and Massive PECLOT Team Treatment of Sub-Massive and Massive PE
CLOT Team Treatment of Sub-Massive and Massive PEEMCrit Blog and Podcast
 
Interventiontionist Treatment of Acute DVT
Interventiontionist Treatment of Acute DVTInterventiontionist Treatment of Acute DVT
Interventiontionist Treatment of Acute DVTSalutaria
 
Churg -Strauss syndrome
Churg -Strauss syndromeChurg -Strauss syndrome
Churg -Strauss syndromeJoisy Aloor
 
dvt prophylaxis, in icu, deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis ,
dvt prophylaxis, in icu, deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis ,dvt prophylaxis, in icu, deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis ,
dvt prophylaxis, in icu, deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis ,gagan brar
 
H T N Emergency In Aortic Aneurysm
H T N Emergency In Aortic AneurysmH T N Emergency In Aortic Aneurysm
H T N Emergency In Aortic AneurysmAhmed Shalabi
 
Deep Vein Thrombosis
Deep Vein ThrombosisDeep Vein Thrombosis
Deep Vein Thrombosisdbridley
 

Tendances (20)

Cuando empeza y cuando parar la profilaxis
Cuando empeza y cuando parar la profilaxisCuando empeza y cuando parar la profilaxis
Cuando empeza y cuando parar la profilaxis
 
Clinical and haemodynamic evaluation of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hype...
Clinical and haemodynamic evaluation of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hype...Clinical and haemodynamic evaluation of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hype...
Clinical and haemodynamic evaluation of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hype...
 
Dvt&pe
Dvt&peDvt&pe
Dvt&pe
 
ITP ASH Guideline
ITP ASH GuidelineITP ASH Guideline
ITP ASH Guideline
 
Cardio
CardioCardio
Cardio
 
A Complete & Effective Study Of Venous Thromboembolism
A Complete & Effective Study Of Venous ThromboembolismA Complete & Effective Study Of Venous Thromboembolism
A Complete & Effective Study Of Venous Thromboembolism
 
The Coagulopathy of Trauma: A Review of Mechanisms
The Coagulopathy of Trauma: A Review of MechanismsThe Coagulopathy of Trauma: A Review of Mechanisms
The Coagulopathy of Trauma: A Review of Mechanisms
 
Post covid anticoagulant role
Post covid anticoagulant rolePost covid anticoagulant role
Post covid anticoagulant role
 
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE): Recent Advances in Reducing the Disease Burden
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE): Recent Advances in Reducing the Disease BurdenVenous Thromboembolism (VTE): Recent Advances in Reducing the Disease Burden
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE): Recent Advances in Reducing the Disease Burden
 
Smoaj.000572
Smoaj.000572Smoaj.000572
Smoaj.000572
 
Gene expression and IVUS
Gene expression and IVUSGene expression and IVUS
Gene expression and IVUS
 
Massive bleeding, are doing our best? m. marietta
Massive bleeding, are doing our best?  m. mariettaMassive bleeding, are doing our best?  m. marietta
Massive bleeding, are doing our best? m. marietta
 
CLOT Team Treatment of Sub-Massive and Massive PE
CLOT Team Treatment of Sub-Massive and Massive PECLOT Team Treatment of Sub-Massive and Massive PE
CLOT Team Treatment of Sub-Massive and Massive PE
 
Vol1Issue3_8OA
Vol1Issue3_8OAVol1Issue3_8OA
Vol1Issue3_8OA
 
Interventiontionist Treatment of Acute DVT
Interventiontionist Treatment of Acute DVTInterventiontionist Treatment of Acute DVT
Interventiontionist Treatment of Acute DVT
 
Churg -Strauss syndrome
Churg -Strauss syndromeChurg -Strauss syndrome
Churg -Strauss syndrome
 
dvt prophylaxis, in icu, deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis ,
dvt prophylaxis, in icu, deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis ,dvt prophylaxis, in icu, deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis ,
dvt prophylaxis, in icu, deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis ,
 
H T N Emergency In Aortic Aneurysm
H T N Emergency In Aortic AneurysmH T N Emergency In Aortic Aneurysm
H T N Emergency In Aortic Aneurysm
 
Deep Vein Thrombosis
Deep Vein ThrombosisDeep Vein Thrombosis
Deep Vein Thrombosis
 
TRALI
TRALITRALI
TRALI
 

En vedette (8)

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for lung cancer scre...
The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for lung cancer scre...The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for lung cancer scre...
The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for lung cancer scre...
 
Manuseio do tubo "T"
Manuseio do tubo "T"Manuseio do tubo "T"
Manuseio do tubo "T"
 
Desmame ventilatório
Desmame ventilatórioDesmame ventilatório
Desmame ventilatório
 
Processo de Desmame Ventilatório e Extubação
Processo de Desmame Ventilatório e ExtubaçãoProcesso de Desmame Ventilatório e Extubação
Processo de Desmame Ventilatório e Extubação
 
Desmame Da VentilaçãO MecâNica
Desmame Da VentilaçãO MecâNicaDesmame Da VentilaçãO MecâNica
Desmame Da VentilaçãO MecâNica
 
Oxigenoterapia alto y bajo flujo
Oxigenoterapia alto y bajo flujoOxigenoterapia alto y bajo flujo
Oxigenoterapia alto y bajo flujo
 
Instrumentos de Laboratorio 2
Instrumentos de Laboratorio 2Instrumentos de Laboratorio 2
Instrumentos de Laboratorio 2
 
Evolução de UTI
Evolução de UTIEvolução de UTI
Evolução de UTI
 

Similaire à Dose-related Effect of Statins in Venous Thrombosis Risk Reduction

Statin therapy associated with improved thrombus resolution in patients with ...
Statin therapy associated with improved thrombus resolution in patients with ...Statin therapy associated with improved thrombus resolution in patients with ...
Statin therapy associated with improved thrombus resolution in patients with ...TÀI LIỆU NGÀNH MAY
 
Trials and errors in cardiovascular medicine 2013
Trials and errors in cardiovascular medicine  2013Trials and errors in cardiovascular medicine  2013
Trials and errors in cardiovascular medicine 2013Ramachandra Barik
 
Nej moa1105594
Nej moa1105594Nej moa1105594
Nej moa1105594poe_ku
 
Bleeding and Coagulopathies in Critical Care (1).pdf
 Bleeding and Coagulopathies in Critical Care (1).pdf Bleeding and Coagulopathies in Critical Care (1).pdf
Bleeding and Coagulopathies in Critical Care (1).pdfJoseOrtiz241350
 
Annualized bleeding rate ABR slide .pptx
Annualized bleeding rate ABR slide .pptxAnnualized bleeding rate ABR slide .pptx
Annualized bleeding rate ABR slide .pptxdrewanta
 
Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease
Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic diseaseAntithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease
Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic diseaseMoisés Sauñe Ferrel
 
Bleeding complications in secondary stroke prevention by antiplatelet therapy...
Bleeding complications in secondary stroke prevention by antiplatelet therapy...Bleeding complications in secondary stroke prevention by antiplatelet therapy...
Bleeding complications in secondary stroke prevention by antiplatelet therapy...Duwan Arismendy
 
Ajc suppl 1 2009-7
Ajc suppl 1 2009-7Ajc suppl 1 2009-7
Ajc suppl 1 2009-7avertes
 
DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN STROKE
DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN STROKEDUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN STROKE
DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN STROKEarnab ghosh
 
Pulmonary embolism update on management and controversies.pdf
Pulmonary embolism update on management and controversies.pdfPulmonary embolism update on management and controversies.pdf
Pulmonary embolism update on management and controversies.pdfjosepabloqueroreyes
 
Addition of propranolol and isosorbide mononitrate to endoscopic variceal lig...
Addition of propranolol and isosorbide mononitrate to endoscopic variceal lig...Addition of propranolol and isosorbide mononitrate to endoscopic variceal lig...
Addition of propranolol and isosorbide mononitrate to endoscopic variceal lig...Stefii Gómez Cedrón
 
Managment of thrombocytopenia in ICU..pptx
Managment of thrombocytopenia in ICU..pptxManagment of thrombocytopenia in ICU..pptx
Managment of thrombocytopenia in ICU..pptxMarwa Besar
 
2020 state of the art—high-sensitivity troponins in acute coronary syndromes
2020 state of the art—high-sensitivity troponins in acute coronary syndromes2020 state of the art—high-sensitivity troponins in acute coronary syndromes
2020 state of the art—high-sensitivity troponins in acute coronary syndromesBryanMielesM
 
J clin exp card analysis of bleeding complications in acute coronary syndrome
J clin exp card  analysis of bleeding complications in acute coronary syndromeJ clin exp card  analysis of bleeding complications in acute coronary syndrome
J clin exp card analysis of bleeding complications in acute coronary syndromeAlexandria University, Egypt
 

Similaire à Dose-related Effect of Statins in Venous Thrombosis Risk Reduction (20)

Statin therapy associated with improved thrombus resolution in patients with ...
Statin therapy associated with improved thrombus resolution in patients with ...Statin therapy associated with improved thrombus resolution in patients with ...
Statin therapy associated with improved thrombus resolution in patients with ...
 
Trials and errors in cardiovascular medicine 2013
Trials and errors in cardiovascular medicine  2013Trials and errors in cardiovascular medicine  2013
Trials and errors in cardiovascular medicine 2013
 
Nej moa1105594
Nej moa1105594Nej moa1105594
Nej moa1105594
 
Bleeding and Coagulopathies in Critical Care (1).pdf
 Bleeding and Coagulopathies in Critical Care (1).pdf Bleeding and Coagulopathies in Critical Care (1).pdf
Bleeding and Coagulopathies in Critical Care (1).pdf
 
Annualized bleeding rate ABR slide .pptx
Annualized bleeding rate ABR slide .pptxAnnualized bleeding rate ABR slide .pptx
Annualized bleeding rate ABR slide .pptx
 
American Journal of Emergency & Critical Care Medicine
American Journal of Emergency & Critical Care MedicineAmerican Journal of Emergency & Critical Care Medicine
American Journal of Emergency & Critical Care Medicine
 
Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease
Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic diseaseAntithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease
Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease
 
Bleeding complications in secondary stroke prevention by antiplatelet therapy...
Bleeding complications in secondary stroke prevention by antiplatelet therapy...Bleeding complications in secondary stroke prevention by antiplatelet therapy...
Bleeding complications in secondary stroke prevention by antiplatelet therapy...
 
Ajc suppl 1 2009-7
Ajc suppl 1 2009-7Ajc suppl 1 2009-7
Ajc suppl 1 2009-7
 
DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN STROKE
DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN STROKEDUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN STROKE
DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN STROKE
 
Pulmonary embolism update on management and controversies.pdf
Pulmonary embolism update on management and controversies.pdfPulmonary embolism update on management and controversies.pdf
Pulmonary embolism update on management and controversies.pdf
 
Addition of propranolol and isosorbide mononitrate to endoscopic variceal lig...
Addition of propranolol and isosorbide mononitrate to endoscopic variceal lig...Addition of propranolol and isosorbide mononitrate to endoscopic variceal lig...
Addition of propranolol and isosorbide mononitrate to endoscopic variceal lig...
 
Managment of thrombocytopenia in ICU..pptx
Managment of thrombocytopenia in ICU..pptxManagment of thrombocytopenia in ICU..pptx
Managment of thrombocytopenia in ICU..pptx
 
2020 state of the art—high-sensitivity troponins in acute coronary syndromes
2020 state of the art—high-sensitivity troponins in acute coronary syndromes2020 state of the art—high-sensitivity troponins in acute coronary syndromes
2020 state of the art—high-sensitivity troponins in acute coronary syndromes
 
Heart .pptx
Heart .pptxHeart .pptx
Heart .pptx
 
Genomics in CVD
Genomics in CVDGenomics in CVD
Genomics in CVD
 
J clin exp card analysis of bleeding complications in acute coronary syndrome
J clin exp card  analysis of bleeding complications in acute coronary syndromeJ clin exp card  analysis of bleeding complications in acute coronary syndrome
J clin exp card analysis of bleeding complications in acute coronary syndrome
 
Oral apixaban
Oral apixabanOral apixaban
Oral apixaban
 
Nrcardio.2014.104
Nrcardio.2014.104Nrcardio.2014.104
Nrcardio.2014.104
 
Anti platelet therapy
Anti platelet therapyAnti platelet therapy
Anti platelet therapy
 

Dernier

💰Call Girl In Bangalore☎️63788-78445💰 Call Girl service in Bangalore☎️Bangalo...
💰Call Girl In Bangalore☎️63788-78445💰 Call Girl service in Bangalore☎️Bangalo...💰Call Girl In Bangalore☎️63788-78445💰 Call Girl service in Bangalore☎️Bangalo...
💰Call Girl In Bangalore☎️63788-78445💰 Call Girl service in Bangalore☎️Bangalo...gragneelam30
 
Call Girls Bangalore - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 💯Call Us 🔝 6378878445 🔝 💃 ...
Call Girls Bangalore - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 💯Call Us 🔝 6378878445 🔝 💃 ...Call Girls Bangalore - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 💯Call Us 🔝 6378878445 🔝 💃 ...
Call Girls Bangalore - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 💯Call Us 🔝 6378878445 🔝 💃 ...gragneelam30
 
Jaipur Call Girl Service 📞9xx000xx09📞Just Call Divya📲 Call Girl In Jaipur No💰...
Jaipur Call Girl Service 📞9xx000xx09📞Just Call Divya📲 Call Girl In Jaipur No💰...Jaipur Call Girl Service 📞9xx000xx09📞Just Call Divya📲 Call Girl In Jaipur No💰...
Jaipur Call Girl Service 📞9xx000xx09📞Just Call Divya📲 Call Girl In Jaipur No💰...Sheetaleventcompany
 
Kolkata Call Girls Naktala 💯Call Us 🔝 8005736733 🔝 💃 Top Class Call Girl Se...
Kolkata Call Girls Naktala  💯Call Us 🔝 8005736733 🔝 💃  Top Class Call Girl Se...Kolkata Call Girls Naktala  💯Call Us 🔝 8005736733 🔝 💃  Top Class Call Girl Se...
Kolkata Call Girls Naktala 💯Call Us 🔝 8005736733 🔝 💃 Top Class Call Girl Se...Namrata Singh
 
Ahmedabad Call Girls Book Now 9630942363 Top Class Ahmedabad Escort Service A...
Ahmedabad Call Girls Book Now 9630942363 Top Class Ahmedabad Escort Service A...Ahmedabad Call Girls Book Now 9630942363 Top Class Ahmedabad Escort Service A...
Ahmedabad Call Girls Book Now 9630942363 Top Class Ahmedabad Escort Service A...GENUINE ESCORT AGENCY
 
Gorgeous Call Girls Dehradun {8854095900} ❤️VVIP ROCKY Call Girls in Dehradun...
Gorgeous Call Girls Dehradun {8854095900} ❤️VVIP ROCKY Call Girls in Dehradun...Gorgeous Call Girls Dehradun {8854095900} ❤️VVIP ROCKY Call Girls in Dehradun...
Gorgeous Call Girls Dehradun {8854095900} ❤️VVIP ROCKY Call Girls in Dehradun...Sheetaleventcompany
 
Premium Call Girls Nagpur {9xx000xx09} ❤️VVIP POOJA Call Girls in Nagpur Maha...
Premium Call Girls Nagpur {9xx000xx09} ❤️VVIP POOJA Call Girls in Nagpur Maha...Premium Call Girls Nagpur {9xx000xx09} ❤️VVIP POOJA Call Girls in Nagpur Maha...
Premium Call Girls Nagpur {9xx000xx09} ❤️VVIP POOJA Call Girls in Nagpur Maha...Sheetaleventcompany
 
Race Course Road } Book Call Girls in Bangalore | Whatsapp No 6378878445 VIP ...
Race Course Road } Book Call Girls in Bangalore | Whatsapp No 6378878445 VIP ...Race Course Road } Book Call Girls in Bangalore | Whatsapp No 6378878445 VIP ...
Race Course Road } Book Call Girls in Bangalore | Whatsapp No 6378878445 VIP ...dishamehta3332
 
💚Chandigarh Call Girls 💯Riya 📲🔝8868886958🔝Call Girls In Chandigarh No💰Advance...
💚Chandigarh Call Girls 💯Riya 📲🔝8868886958🔝Call Girls In Chandigarh No💰Advance...💚Chandigarh Call Girls 💯Riya 📲🔝8868886958🔝Call Girls In Chandigarh No💰Advance...
💚Chandigarh Call Girls 💯Riya 📲🔝8868886958🔝Call Girls In Chandigarh No💰Advance...Sheetaleventcompany
 
Electrocardiogram (ECG) physiological basis .pdf
Electrocardiogram (ECG) physiological basis .pdfElectrocardiogram (ECG) physiological basis .pdf
Electrocardiogram (ECG) physiological basis .pdfMedicoseAcademics
 
Cardiac Output, Venous Return, and Their Regulation
Cardiac Output, Venous Return, and Their RegulationCardiac Output, Venous Return, and Their Regulation
Cardiac Output, Venous Return, and Their RegulationMedicoseAcademics
 
VIP Hyderabad Call Girls KPHB 7877925207 ₹5000 To 25K With AC Room 💚😋
VIP Hyderabad Call Girls KPHB 7877925207 ₹5000 To 25K With AC Room 💚😋VIP Hyderabad Call Girls KPHB 7877925207 ₹5000 To 25K With AC Room 💚😋
VIP Hyderabad Call Girls KPHB 7877925207 ₹5000 To 25K With AC Room 💚😋mahima pandey
 
🚺LEELA JOSHI WhatsApp Number +91-9930245274 ✔ Unsatisfied Bhabhi Call Girls T...
🚺LEELA JOSHI WhatsApp Number +91-9930245274 ✔ Unsatisfied Bhabhi Call Girls T...🚺LEELA JOSHI WhatsApp Number +91-9930245274 ✔ Unsatisfied Bhabhi Call Girls T...
🚺LEELA JOSHI WhatsApp Number +91-9930245274 ✔ Unsatisfied Bhabhi Call Girls T...soniya pandit
 
👉Chandigarh Call Girl Service📲Niamh 8868886958 📲Book 24hours Now📲👉Sexy Call G...
👉Chandigarh Call Girl Service📲Niamh 8868886958 📲Book 24hours Now📲👉Sexy Call G...👉Chandigarh Call Girl Service📲Niamh 8868886958 📲Book 24hours Now📲👉Sexy Call G...
👉Chandigarh Call Girl Service📲Niamh 8868886958 📲Book 24hours Now📲👉Sexy Call G...Sheetaleventcompany
 
Intramuscular & Intravenous Injection.pptx
Intramuscular & Intravenous Injection.pptxIntramuscular & Intravenous Injection.pptx
Intramuscular & Intravenous Injection.pptxsaranpratha12
 
Chandigarh Call Girls Service ❤️🍑 9809698092 👄🫦Independent Escort Service Cha...
Chandigarh Call Girls Service ❤️🍑 9809698092 👄🫦Independent Escort Service Cha...Chandigarh Call Girls Service ❤️🍑 9809698092 👄🫦Independent Escort Service Cha...
Chandigarh Call Girls Service ❤️🍑 9809698092 👄🫦Independent Escort Service Cha...Sheetaleventcompany
 
Call 8250092165 Patna Call Girls ₹4.5k Cash Payment With Room Delivery
Call 8250092165 Patna Call Girls ₹4.5k Cash Payment With Room DeliveryCall 8250092165 Patna Call Girls ₹4.5k Cash Payment With Room Delivery
Call 8250092165 Patna Call Girls ₹4.5k Cash Payment With Room DeliveryJyoti singh
 
Circulatory Shock, types and stages, compensatory mechanisms
Circulatory Shock, types and stages, compensatory mechanismsCirculatory Shock, types and stages, compensatory mechanisms
Circulatory Shock, types and stages, compensatory mechanismsMedicoseAcademics
 
Call Girls Shahdol Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Shahdol Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Shahdol Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Shahdol Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableDipal Arora
 
Cara Menggugurkan Kandungan Dengan Cepat Selesai Dalam 24 Jam Secara Alami Bu...
Cara Menggugurkan Kandungan Dengan Cepat Selesai Dalam 24 Jam Secara Alami Bu...Cara Menggugurkan Kandungan Dengan Cepat Selesai Dalam 24 Jam Secara Alami Bu...
Cara Menggugurkan Kandungan Dengan Cepat Selesai Dalam 24 Jam Secara Alami Bu...Cara Menggugurkan Kandungan 087776558899
 

Dernier (20)

💰Call Girl In Bangalore☎️63788-78445💰 Call Girl service in Bangalore☎️Bangalo...
💰Call Girl In Bangalore☎️63788-78445💰 Call Girl service in Bangalore☎️Bangalo...💰Call Girl In Bangalore☎️63788-78445💰 Call Girl service in Bangalore☎️Bangalo...
💰Call Girl In Bangalore☎️63788-78445💰 Call Girl service in Bangalore☎️Bangalo...
 
Call Girls Bangalore - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 💯Call Us 🔝 6378878445 🔝 💃 ...
Call Girls Bangalore - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 💯Call Us 🔝 6378878445 🔝 💃 ...Call Girls Bangalore - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 💯Call Us 🔝 6378878445 🔝 💃 ...
Call Girls Bangalore - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 💯Call Us 🔝 6378878445 🔝 💃 ...
 
Jaipur Call Girl Service 📞9xx000xx09📞Just Call Divya📲 Call Girl In Jaipur No💰...
Jaipur Call Girl Service 📞9xx000xx09📞Just Call Divya📲 Call Girl In Jaipur No💰...Jaipur Call Girl Service 📞9xx000xx09📞Just Call Divya📲 Call Girl In Jaipur No💰...
Jaipur Call Girl Service 📞9xx000xx09📞Just Call Divya📲 Call Girl In Jaipur No💰...
 
Kolkata Call Girls Naktala 💯Call Us 🔝 8005736733 🔝 💃 Top Class Call Girl Se...
Kolkata Call Girls Naktala  💯Call Us 🔝 8005736733 🔝 💃  Top Class Call Girl Se...Kolkata Call Girls Naktala  💯Call Us 🔝 8005736733 🔝 💃  Top Class Call Girl Se...
Kolkata Call Girls Naktala 💯Call Us 🔝 8005736733 🔝 💃 Top Class Call Girl Se...
 
Ahmedabad Call Girls Book Now 9630942363 Top Class Ahmedabad Escort Service A...
Ahmedabad Call Girls Book Now 9630942363 Top Class Ahmedabad Escort Service A...Ahmedabad Call Girls Book Now 9630942363 Top Class Ahmedabad Escort Service A...
Ahmedabad Call Girls Book Now 9630942363 Top Class Ahmedabad Escort Service A...
 
Gorgeous Call Girls Dehradun {8854095900} ❤️VVIP ROCKY Call Girls in Dehradun...
Gorgeous Call Girls Dehradun {8854095900} ❤️VVIP ROCKY Call Girls in Dehradun...Gorgeous Call Girls Dehradun {8854095900} ❤️VVIP ROCKY Call Girls in Dehradun...
Gorgeous Call Girls Dehradun {8854095900} ❤️VVIP ROCKY Call Girls in Dehradun...
 
Premium Call Girls Nagpur {9xx000xx09} ❤️VVIP POOJA Call Girls in Nagpur Maha...
Premium Call Girls Nagpur {9xx000xx09} ❤️VVIP POOJA Call Girls in Nagpur Maha...Premium Call Girls Nagpur {9xx000xx09} ❤️VVIP POOJA Call Girls in Nagpur Maha...
Premium Call Girls Nagpur {9xx000xx09} ❤️VVIP POOJA Call Girls in Nagpur Maha...
 
Race Course Road } Book Call Girls in Bangalore | Whatsapp No 6378878445 VIP ...
Race Course Road } Book Call Girls in Bangalore | Whatsapp No 6378878445 VIP ...Race Course Road } Book Call Girls in Bangalore | Whatsapp No 6378878445 VIP ...
Race Course Road } Book Call Girls in Bangalore | Whatsapp No 6378878445 VIP ...
 
💚Chandigarh Call Girls 💯Riya 📲🔝8868886958🔝Call Girls In Chandigarh No💰Advance...
💚Chandigarh Call Girls 💯Riya 📲🔝8868886958🔝Call Girls In Chandigarh No💰Advance...💚Chandigarh Call Girls 💯Riya 📲🔝8868886958🔝Call Girls In Chandigarh No💰Advance...
💚Chandigarh Call Girls 💯Riya 📲🔝8868886958🔝Call Girls In Chandigarh No💰Advance...
 
Electrocardiogram (ECG) physiological basis .pdf
Electrocardiogram (ECG) physiological basis .pdfElectrocardiogram (ECG) physiological basis .pdf
Electrocardiogram (ECG) physiological basis .pdf
 
Cardiac Output, Venous Return, and Their Regulation
Cardiac Output, Venous Return, and Their RegulationCardiac Output, Venous Return, and Their Regulation
Cardiac Output, Venous Return, and Their Regulation
 
VIP Hyderabad Call Girls KPHB 7877925207 ₹5000 To 25K With AC Room 💚😋
VIP Hyderabad Call Girls KPHB 7877925207 ₹5000 To 25K With AC Room 💚😋VIP Hyderabad Call Girls KPHB 7877925207 ₹5000 To 25K With AC Room 💚😋
VIP Hyderabad Call Girls KPHB 7877925207 ₹5000 To 25K With AC Room 💚😋
 
🚺LEELA JOSHI WhatsApp Number +91-9930245274 ✔ Unsatisfied Bhabhi Call Girls T...
🚺LEELA JOSHI WhatsApp Number +91-9930245274 ✔ Unsatisfied Bhabhi Call Girls T...🚺LEELA JOSHI WhatsApp Number +91-9930245274 ✔ Unsatisfied Bhabhi Call Girls T...
🚺LEELA JOSHI WhatsApp Number +91-9930245274 ✔ Unsatisfied Bhabhi Call Girls T...
 
👉Chandigarh Call Girl Service📲Niamh 8868886958 📲Book 24hours Now📲👉Sexy Call G...
👉Chandigarh Call Girl Service📲Niamh 8868886958 📲Book 24hours Now📲👉Sexy Call G...👉Chandigarh Call Girl Service📲Niamh 8868886958 📲Book 24hours Now📲👉Sexy Call G...
👉Chandigarh Call Girl Service📲Niamh 8868886958 📲Book 24hours Now📲👉Sexy Call G...
 
Intramuscular & Intravenous Injection.pptx
Intramuscular & Intravenous Injection.pptxIntramuscular & Intravenous Injection.pptx
Intramuscular & Intravenous Injection.pptx
 
Chandigarh Call Girls Service ❤️🍑 9809698092 👄🫦Independent Escort Service Cha...
Chandigarh Call Girls Service ❤️🍑 9809698092 👄🫦Independent Escort Service Cha...Chandigarh Call Girls Service ❤️🍑 9809698092 👄🫦Independent Escort Service Cha...
Chandigarh Call Girls Service ❤️🍑 9809698092 👄🫦Independent Escort Service Cha...
 
Call 8250092165 Patna Call Girls ₹4.5k Cash Payment With Room Delivery
Call 8250092165 Patna Call Girls ₹4.5k Cash Payment With Room DeliveryCall 8250092165 Patna Call Girls ₹4.5k Cash Payment With Room Delivery
Call 8250092165 Patna Call Girls ₹4.5k Cash Payment With Room Delivery
 
Circulatory Shock, types and stages, compensatory mechanisms
Circulatory Shock, types and stages, compensatory mechanismsCirculatory Shock, types and stages, compensatory mechanisms
Circulatory Shock, types and stages, compensatory mechanisms
 
Call Girls Shahdol Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Shahdol Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Shahdol Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Shahdol Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Cara Menggugurkan Kandungan Dengan Cepat Selesai Dalam 24 Jam Secara Alami Bu...
Cara Menggugurkan Kandungan Dengan Cepat Selesai Dalam 24 Jam Secara Alami Bu...Cara Menggugurkan Kandungan Dengan Cepat Selesai Dalam 24 Jam Secara Alami Bu...
Cara Menggugurkan Kandungan Dengan Cepat Selesai Dalam 24 Jam Secara Alami Bu...
 

Dose-related Effect of Statins in Venous Thrombosis Risk Reduction

  • 1. CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY Dose-related Effect of Statins in Venous Thrombosis Risk Reduction Danai Khemasuwan, MD,a Young Kwang Chae, MD, MPH, MBA,a Shikha Gupta, MD,a Alejandra Carpio, MD,a Jeong Hyun Yun, MD, MPH,a Stefan Neagu, MD,a Anabella B. Lucca, MD,a Matias E. Valsecchi, MD, MSc,b Jorge I. Mora, MDc a Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa; bDepartment of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa; cDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa. ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Atherosclerosis and venous thromboembolism share similar pathophysiology based on common inflammatory mediators. The dose-related effect of statin therapy in venous thromboembolism remains controversial. This study investigated whether the use of antiplatelet therapy and statins decrease the occurrence of venous thromboembolism in patients with atherosclerosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study reviewing 1795 consecutive patients with athero- sclerosis admitted to a teaching hospital between 2005 and 2010. Patients who had been treated with anticoagulation therapy were excluded. Patients who either used statins for 2 months or never used them were allocated to the nonuser group. RESULTS: The final analysis included 1100 patients. The overall incidence of venous thromboembolism was 9.7%. Among statin users, 6.3% (54/861) developed venous thromboembolism, compared with 22.2% (53/239) in the nonuser group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.24; P .001). After controlling for confounding factors, statin use was still associated with a lower risk of developing venous thromboembolism (HR 0.29; P .001). High-dose statin use (average 50.9 mg/day) (HR 0.25; P .001) lowered the risk of venous thromboembolism compared with standard-dose statins (average 22.2 mg/day) (HR 0.38; P .001). Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel decreased occurrence of venous thromboembolism (HR 0.19; P .001). Interestingly, combined statins and antiplatelet therapy further reduced the occurrence of venous thromboembolism (HR 0.16; P .001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of statins and antiplatelet therapy is associated with a significant reduction in the occurrence of venous thromboembolism with a dose-related response of statins. Published by Elsevier Inc. • The American Journal of Medicine (2011) 124, 852-859 KEYWORDS: Antiplatelet therapy; Atherosclerosis; Deep vein thrombosis; Pulmonary embolism; Statins; Venous thromboembolism The pathophysiology of venous thromboembolism was gen- port a new perspective on a possible common mechanism erally considered to be different from that of thrombotic between venous thromboembolism and atherosclerotic dis- atherosclerosis. However, there is growing evidence to sup- ease.1 The inflammatory cells present in the atherosclerotic plaques release cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor alpha,2,3 which are essentially the Funding: None. Conflict of Interest: None of the authors has any conflict of interest to same inflammatory mediators that were found to be elevated disclose. in patients with venous thrombosis.4,5 A large population- Authorship: All authors meet criteria for authorship including access based cohort also was supportive of the aforementioned to the data, and all authors had a role in writing the manuscript. hypothesis. This study assessed the risk of hospitalization Requests for reprints should be addressed to Danai Khemasuwan, MD, Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA due to myocardial infarction and stroke after the diagnosis 19141. of venous thromboembolism. It showed convincing evi- E-mail address: danai_md@hotmail.com dence that patients with diagnosis of deep venous thrombo- 0002-9343/$ -see front matter Published by Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.04.019
  • 2. Khemasuwan et al Statins for Venous Thrombosis Risk Reduction 853 sis and pulmonary embolism had a significantly increased 2 months were relegated to the nonuser group. All patients risk of subsequent cardiovascular events during a follow-up included in the analysis had a minimum of 2 hospital visits. period of up to 20 years.6 Conversely, patients with history Patients who were taking oral anticoagulation on the first of myocardial infarction or stroke had significantly in- admission or who started them after the diagnosis of car- creased risk for venous thromboembolism within 3 months diovascular disease, were excluded. The outcome of the after diagnosis.7 Additionally, a study focused on the occurrence recent meta-analysis evaluating of venous thromboemblism, the prevalence of major cardiovas- which consisted of deep vein CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE cular risk factors such as meta- thrombosis or pulmonary embo- bolic syndrome and high serum ● The use of statins reduced the risk of lism, or both. Doppler ultrasound level of low-density lipoprotein subsequent venous thrombosis with a with the criterion of venous com- (LDL) in patients with venous hazard ratio of 0.24 (P .001) com- pressibility with transducer was thromboembolism revealed that used to diagnose deep venous pared with non-statin users. these were significantly increased thrombosis of femoral and popliteal in patients with venous thrombo- ● Statins may have an antithrombotic ef- veins. Computed pulmonary an- embolism.8-10 On the contrary, fect in a dose-related manner. High- giography with the presence of pul- high serum levels of high-density dose statin use lowered the risk of ve- monary emboli or high probability lipoprotein (HDL) were associ- nous thromboembolism compared with on ventilation-perfusion scan was ated with a reduced risk of recur- standard-dose statins. used to diagnose pulmonary rent venous thromboembolism.11 embolism. These associations may suggest a ● The combination of statins and anti- clinical implication of antiplatelet platelet therapy further reduced the oc- Procedure and lipid-lowering therapy (such currence of venous thromboembolism. All the data were collected from an as statins) in venous thromboem- electronic medical record system. bolism prevention. Demographic data, the presence of Based on the currently avail- risk factors for atherosclerosis and able data, we hypothesize that statins and antiplatelet ther- venous thromboembolism were collected, including history apy may have a role for venous thromboembolism preven- of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity (body mass index tion in patients at high risk for atherosclerotic disease. 30), smoking, cancer, metastatic cancer, immobilization, Therefore, we conducted this study in order to explore the use of estrogen hormone therapy or its derivatives, use of association between the use of statins or antiplatelet therapy statins including dosage and duration, use of aspirin, and and the occurrence of venous thromboembolism among use of clopidogrel. Patients with diagnosis of either a pul- patients with history of atherosclerosis. monary embolism or a deep vein thrombosis were allocated in the venous thromboembolism group. Laboratory values MATERIALS AND METHODS that were recorded included serum LDL level, serum HDL level, and serum triglyceride. Patients and Data Collection Statin dosage was collected from the medical reconcili- This is a retrospective cohort study that was focused on ation form upon each admission for each patient. The dose patients with established diagnosis of atherosclerosis, in- classification of statins was based on the potency of each cluding ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction. The di- statin on the standard conversion chart.12 As a result, stan- agnosis of transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke was dard-dose usage of statins was defined as daily statin use of made by a history of sudden-onset, focal or global neuro- 80 mg of fluvastatin or pravastatin, and 40 mg of lova- logical deficits, which were confirmed when possible by statin, simvastatin, or atorvastatin, and 10 mg of rosuv- computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans. Myocardial infarction was determined by clinical astatin. On the other hand, high-dose usage of statins was presentation of angina pectoris with either elevation of tro- defined as daily statin use 10 mg of rosuvastatin, and 40 ponin I or electrocardiogram changes. All the patients with mg of lovastatin, simvastatin, or atorvastatin. diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases admitted at Albert Ein- stein Medical Center between November 2005 and January Statistical Analysis 2010 were eligible for the study. The duration of statin use This study was a retrospective, cohort study designed to and antiplatelet therapy, including aspirin and clopidogrel, determine occurrence of venous thromboembolism in pa- was recorded. Statin use included: atorvastatin, simvastatin, tients with atherosclerotic disease. For the analysis of the rosuvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, and fluvastatin. Statin primary cohort, adjustments were made for age and sex. The dosage was calculated as an average dose per day over the comparative risk for venous thromboembolism between observation period. The cardiovascular risk factors and pos- each group was expressed as the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) sible risk factors for venous thromboembolism were re- along with its 95% confidence interval (CI). Baseline char- corded. Patients who never used statins or had used them for acteristics were compared within each group using either an
  • 3. 854 The American Journal of Medicine, Vol 124, No 9, September 2011 analysis of variance for continuous variables or the chi- P-Value .009 squared test for categorical data. All the P values were .99 .49 .34 .23 .66 .22 .44 .02 .77 .16 .06 .68 .16 2-sided with a level of .05 for statistical significance. The univariate relationship between use of statins or antiplatelet 578 (49.8%) 838 (76.3%) 1,015 (92.3%) 350 (31.8%) 183 (16.6%) 249 (22.6%) 266 (24.2%) 238 (21.6%) 496 (45.1%) 728 (66.2%) 572 (52%) 45 (4%) 10 (1%) therapy and the occurrence of venous thromboembolism n 1100 were assessed. Multivariate Cox regression was used to Total 67.3 control for all other potential confounding variables, includ- ing diabetes mellitus, obesity (body mass index 30), smoking, cancer, metastatic cancer, immobilization, and use 48 (53.3%) 68 (75.6%) 42 (46.7%) 23 (25.6%) 19 (21.1%) 15 (16.6%) 23 (25.5%) 14 (15.6%) 40 (44.4%) 81 (90%) 18 (20%) 54 (60%) of estrogen hormone or its derivatives. We performed in- Nonuser 0 (0%) n 88 teraction analysis by using Wald test and likelihood ratio 67.7 test. For all statistical analyses, we used STATA, version 9 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Tex). 258 (51.3%) 393 (78.1%) 262 (52.1%) 463 (92.1%) 140 (27.8%) 87 (17.3%) 120 (23.8%) 97 (19.3%) 236 (46.9%) 323 (64.2%) Aspirin Use 24 (4.7%) 5(1.9%) 131 (26%) n 503 RESULTS 69.1 Only Over the study period, 1795 consecutive patients with the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases were identified. Among this group, patients who had been treated with anticoagulation Clopidogrel 40 (61.5%) 44 (67.8%) 41 (63.1%) 62 (95.4%) 22 (33.8%) 14 (21.5%) 16 (24.6%) 10 (15.4%) 30 (46.2%) 42 (64.6%) 1 (1.5%) 1(1.5%) 15 (23%) Use Only therapy (oral warfarin or therapeutic dosage of intravenous n 66 66.67 heparin) before their first admission or who had received Demographic Data and Factors Related to VTE with the Use of Statins and the Use of Antiplatelet Therapy anticoagulation therapy after the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases, were excluded (n 208). Also, patients who had 230 (52.5%) 333 (75.3%) 227 (51.4%) 409 (92.5%) 165 (37.3%) 63 (14.3%) 79 (17.9%) 118 (26.7%) 112 (25.3%) 309 (69.9%) Antiplatelet 15 (3.4%) a single hospital visit were excluded (n 487). This re- 190 (43%) 4 (9%) n 443 Therapy sulted in a total of 1100 patients in the final analysis. 65.2 Dual Characteristics of the 1100 patients are shown in Table 1. The mean age of the study sample was 67.3 years; 49.8% of triglyceride. the patients were female; and 76% were African American. P-Value The overall incidence of venous thromboembolism was .062 .003 .003 .35 .05 .01 .03 .09 .39 .51 .28 .29 9.7% (n 107); 78.3% (n 861) were using statins during .7 .5 the follow-up period. The P-value in Table 1 was derived low-density lipoprotein; TG 578 (49.8%) 838 (76.3%) 1,015 (92.3%) 350 (31.8%) 183 (16.6%) 249 (22.6%) 266 (24.2%) 238 (21.6%) 496 (45.1%) 728 (66.2%) from analysis of variance test. The distribution of the statins 572 (52%) 45 (4%) 10 (1%) n 1100 use is listed in Table 2. Univariate analysis demonstrated that having a history of diabetes, hypertension, cancer, cur- Total 67.3 rent smoking, high-serum triglyceride, high-serum LDL, and low HDL did not affect the occurrence of venous 121 (50.7%) 176 (73.6%) 104 (43.5%) 68 (28.5%) 49 (20.5%) 66 (27.6%) 52 (21.8%) 45 (18.8%) 107 (44.7%) 152 (63.6%) thromboembolism during the follow-up period. Metastatic 16 (6.7%) 3 (1.3%) 208 (87%) n 239 cancer, immobilization, hormonal use, and obesity statisti- Nonuser cally increased the risk of developing venous thromboem- 69.1 bolism (HR 2.37, 95% CI, 1.2-4.71; HR 2.0, 95% CI, high-density lipoprotein; LDL 1.35-2.98; HR 3.25, 95% CI, 1.03-10.25; HR 1.54, 95% CI, Standard-dose 1.05-2.29, respectively). Use of statins and use of antiplate- 256 (78.3%) 190 (58.1%) 308 (94.2%) 93 (28.4%) 63 (19.3%) 74 (22.6%) 87 (26.6%) 67 (21.4%) 130 (41.5%) Statins User 16 (4.9%) 4 (1.2%) 170 (52%) 219 (70%) let therapy were related to a reduced occurrence of devel- n 327 oping venous thromboembolism (HR 0.24, 95% CI, 0.17- 67.9 0.36; HR 0.32, 95% CI, 0.19-0.52, respectively) (Table 3). 406 (76.03%) 287 (53.7%) 278 (52.1%) 499 (93.5%) 189 (35.4%) 71 (13.3%) 109 (20.4%) 127 (23.8%) 126 (22.9%) 259 (47.3%) 357 (65.1%) 13 (2.4%) 3 (0.5%) Statins High-dose n 534 Statins The average duration of the follow-up period in the statin body mass index; HDL 66.1 User user group was 13.4 months (range 2-56 months). Among statins users, a majority of patients (62.1%) were taking high dosages of statins ( 10 mg of rosuvastatin, and 40 Race, African American mg of lovastatin, simvastatin, or atorvastatin). An average HDL( 40 M/ 50 F) Obesity (BMI 30) Metastatic cancer dose of statins in this group was 50.9 mg/day. On the other Immobilization Hormonal use hand, 327 patients (37.9%) took standard dosages of statins Hypertension LDL ( 100) Sex, female TG ( 150) Age, years Table 1 ( 80 mg of fluvastatin, pravastatin, 40 mg of lovastatin, BMI Diabetes Smoking Cancer simvastatin, or atorvastatin, and 10 mg of rosuvastatin). An average dose of statins in this group was 22.2 mg/day.
  • 4. Khemasuwan et al Statins for Venous Thrombosis Risk Reduction 855 Table 2 Summary of Different Types of Statin Therapy and the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Standard Dose High Dose Total Number Number of VTE n 327 n 534 of Patients Occurrence Type of Statins Used (37.9%) (62.1%) n 861 n 54 Atorvastatin 191 368 559 29 Simvastatin 101 138 239 20 Lovastatin 11 20 31 3 Rosuvastatin 0 8 8 0 Pravastatin 18 0 18 2 Fluvastatin 6 0 6 0 VTE venous thromboembolism. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that statin use was apy, which is either aspirin or clopidogrel, and dual anti- associated with a lower risk of developing venous throm- platelet therapy, is shown in Figure 3. boembolism (log rank test P-value .001; Figure 1). Fur- thermore, high-dose statin use appears to be related to lower Multivariate Cox Regression Analysis occurrence of venous thromboembolism compared with A multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusting for known standard-dose statins use (Figure 2). risk factors for venous thromboembolism, including those factors that were statistically significant in the univariate Antiplatelet Therapy regression analysis and have been shown to be related to an The average duration of the follow-up period of antiplatelet occurrence of venous thromboembolism (metastatic cancer, therapy users was 13.48 months in the aspirin-user group immobilization, hormonal use, and obesity), as well as the (range 2-78 months), and 13.53 months for the clopidogrel- use of statins and use of antiplatelet therapy, was performed. user group (range 1-48 months). The Kaplan-Meier plots The increase in occurrence of venous thromboembolism showing the occurrence of venous thromboembolism, com- persisted for immobilization and obesity (HR 1.83, 95% CI, pared between nonantiplatelet user, single antiplatelet ther- 1.22-2.76 and HR 1.64, 95% CI, 1.09-2.45, respectively). Interestingly, statin use continued to be related to a reduc- tion in the occurrence of venous thromboembolism (HR 0.29, 95% CI, 0.19-0.44), possibly in a dose-related manner, Table 3 Univariate Cox Regression Analysis of Factors in standard-dose statin users (HR 0.38, 95% CI, 0.24-0.6) Related to Venous Thromboembolism and Occurrence of Venous and in high-dose statin users (HR 0.25, 95% CI, 0.15-0.4). Thromboembolism In addition to statins, antiplatelet therapy also was related to Factors HR 95% CI P-Value a reduction in the occurrence of venous thromboembolism Diabetes 1.00 0.68–1.46 .99 Hypertension 2.92 0.92–9.22 .07 Smoking 0.72 0.47–1.10 .13 Cancer 1.41 0.88–2.26 .15 Metastatic cancer 2.37 1.20–4.71 .013 Immobilization 2.00 1.35–2.98 .001 Hormonal use 3.25 1.03–10.25 .04 Obesity (BMI 30) 1.54 1.05–2.29 .03 Hyper TG 0.7 0.42–1.76 .18 High LDL 1.32 0.91–1.93 .15 Low HDL 1.05 0.7–1.57 .23 Statins 0.24 0.17–0.36 .001 Regular dose 0.31 0.20–0.49 .001 High dose 0.16 0.09–0.27 .001 Antiplatelet 0.32 0.19–0.52 .001 Aspirin only 0.47 0.28–0.79 .004 Clopidogrel only 0.30 0.11–0.82 .019 Dual antiplatelet 0.19 0.10–0.34 .001 BMI body mass index; CI confidence interval; HDL high- Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier plot showing the occurrence of ve- density lipoprotein; HR hazard ratio; LDL low-density lipoprotein; nous thromboembolism compared between statin use and non- TG triglyceride. statin use.
  • 5. 856 The American Journal of Medicine, Vol 124, No 9, September 2011 Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier plot showing the occurrence of venous thromboembo- lism compared between nonstatin use, standard-dose statin use, and high-dose statin use. (HR 0.47, 95% CI, 0.28-0.79 with aspirin use only; HR 0.3, Additive Effect of Statins and Antiplatelet 95% CI, 0.11-0.82 with clopidogrel use only; and HR 0.19, Therapy 95% CI, 0.1-0.34 with dual antiplatelet therapy) (Table 4). Multivariate logistic regression, when performed, showed In addition to isolated protective effect against venous similar results with the multivariate Cox regression. When thromboembolism of statins and antiplatelet therapy, our controlled for the same multiple risk factors, statin use and study also showed a possible additive effect of combined antiplatelet agent use were associated with reduced risk of statin and antiplatelet therapy. The Kaplan-Meier analysis venous thromboembolism (statins: odds ratio [OR] 0.30, revealed that combined statin and antiplatelet therapy was P .001; antiplatelet agent: OR 0.44, P .007). High-dose associated with a lower risk of developing venous throm- statin use showed lower risk compared with standard-dose boembolism (log rank test P-value .001; Figure 4). In a statin use (high dose: OR 0.21, P .001; standard dose: OR multivariate Cox regression model, combined statin use and 0.42, P .001) (data not shown). antiplatelet therapy reduced the occurrence of venous Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier plot showing the occurrence of venous thromboembo- lism compared between nonantiplatelet use, single antiplatelet therapy, and dual antiplatelet therapy.
  • 6. Khemasuwan et al Statins for Venous Thrombosis Risk Reduction 857 Table 4 Multivariate Cox Regression Analysis of Factors flammatory effect, with significant decrease in high sensi- Related to Venous Thromboembolism and Occurrence of Venous tive C-reactive protein levels at 8 weeks of study period Thromboembolism compared with placebo.13 Statins also can exhibit anti- thrombotic properties and alter coagulation cascades Factors HR 95% CI P-Value through various mechanisms, which are not associated with Metastatic cancer 2.24 0.93–5.44 .07 changes in cholesterol profiles.14-16 Immobilization 1.83 1.22–2.76 .004 The evidence of use of antiplatelet therapy in venous Hormonal use 2.35 0.68–8.11 .18 thromboembolism prevention is still controversial. A meta- Obesity (BMI 30) 1.64 1.09–2.45 .02 analysis on short-term antiplatelet therapy in patients with Statins 0.29 0.19–0.44 .001 cardiovascular risk factors showed a significant reduction in Regular dose 0.38 0.24–0.6 .001 the risk of fatal or nonfatal pulmonary embolism with the High dose 0.25 0.15–0.4 .001 Antiplatelet 0.43 0.25–0.72 .001 odds reduction of 25%.17 However, a randomized trial of Aspirin only 0.47 0.28–0.79 .004 healthy women revealed no supporting evidence of aspirin Clopidogrel only 0.30 0.11–0.82 .02 use in long-term prevention of venous thromboembolism.18 Dual antiplatelet 0.19 0.10–0.34 .001 Clinical trials have shown the benefit of clopidogrel in BMI body mass index; CI confidence interval; HR hazard ratio. prevention of atherosclerosis, more specifically, in acute coronary syndrome and post-drug-eluting stent placement in myocardial infarction, being used either as combined mono- therapy or in combination with aspirin.19,20 However, the thromboembolism (HR 0.16; 95% CI, 0.09-0.31, P-value evidence on the clopidogrel use in venous thromboembo- .001). lism prophylaxis is still inconclusive. Interaction analysis was performed to identify the poten- In our study, history of metastatic cancer, immobiliza- tial interaction between statin and antiplatelet therapy on the tion, hormonal use, and obesity were related to increased occurrence of venous thromboembolism, which revealed no occurrence of venous thromboembolism. These risk factors statistically significant interaction between the statin use are well-studied risk factors for venous thromboembolism and the antiplatelet use (Wald test P .40). in the general population.21 We found an association be- tween statin use and decreased occurrence of venous throm- DISCUSSION bosis in our study population, as previously supported by Statins are currently considered the most effective choles- several retrospective and prospective studies.22-26 A recent terol-lowering drugs available. In addition to lipid-lowering retrospective study of hospitalized cancer patients with in- effects, statins also exert anti-inflammatory effects, reduc- herently high risk for venous thromboembolism showed that ing serum inflammatory markers and enhancing vascular the use of statins was associated with a reduction in the endothelial function. Simvastatin showed a direct anti-in- occurrence of venous thromboembolism.27 Figure 4 Kaplan-Meier plot showing the occurrence of venous thromboembo- lism compared between combined statin and antiplatelet therapy, either use of statin and antiplatelet therapy, and nonuser.
  • 7. 858 The American Journal of Medicine, Vol 124, No 9, September 2011 Furthermore, a recent randomized control trial (the Focusing on the additive effect of statin use and anti- JUPITER study) in healthy adults demonstrated the efficacy platelet therapy on subsequent venous thromboembolism, of rosuvastatin in the reduction of high-sensitive C-reactive our study indicates that the highest protective effect was protein levels by 37% after a median follow-up of 1.9 seen with combined statins use and antiplatelet therapy. years.28 These anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic prop- There is a theoretically attractive possibility that the com- erties of statins may have clinical implication in venous bination therapy of atrovastatin and aspirin reduced platelet thromboembolism prevention among patients with athero- thromboxane A-2 in platelet aggregation process.37 This sclerotic disease. A large randomized controlled trial in a mechanism may play an important role in arterial and ve- healthy population demonstrated that rosuvastatin was sig- nous thrombosis. Therefore, this theory needs further inves- nificantly associated with decreased occurrence of symp- tigation in a randomized controlled trial, evaluating the tomatic venous thromboembolism compared with pla- effect of statins and antiplatelet combination therapy in cebo.29 A recent meta-analysis concluded that statins may patients at high risk of venous thromboembolism. lower the risk of venous thromboembolism.30 However, the randomized controlled trials in this meta-analysis had ve- Strengths and Limitations nous thromboembolism as a secondary outcome. Based on Several points should be included in consideration of the this limitation, its results should be cautiously interpreted. interpretation of our study. Our study would be the first to Our study results suggest that statin use in patients with exhibit the possible dose-related relationship of statins in cardiovascular disease decreases the occurrence of venous the prevention of venous thromboembolism. An innate lim- thromboembolism in this study population in a dose-related itation is that ours is a retrospective study. There are pos- manner. A meta-analysis on the effect of statins on cardio- sible confounding factors that may not have been included vascular outcomes demonstrated that the use of high-dose in the analysis. Moreover, our data do not include other statins provides better outcomes over standard-dose therapy serum markers of inflammation besides high-sensitive C-re- for preventing nonfatal cardiovascular events.31 To our active protein, which may be explained by the protective knowledge, ours is the first study to exhibit the possible effect of statins against the occurrence of venous thrombo- dose-related relationship in terms of prevention for venous embolism. Lastly, in our study, we used medical reconcili- thromboembolism in a population with cardiovascular ation forms to assess medication adherence of the subjects. disease. These forms were designed to record every subject’s med- Our study also included the serum lipid profiles, includ- ication list from each hospital visit. Thus, we assumed that ing serum triglyceride, serum HDL, and serum LDL in the the subjects complied with their medications in the fol- initial univariate analysis. We did not find any relationship low-up period. These limitations should be taken into con- between abnormalities of these lipid profiles and the subse- sideration and need to be addressed in future studies. quent development of venous thromboembolism. These findings are consistent with other prospective studies of risk CONCLUSIONS factors for venous thromboembolism, which have shown no Our study suggests a possible protective effect of statins association between lipid profile and subsequent venous therapy used as a single agent with a possible dose-related thromboembolism.32-34 It is reasonable to postulate that the response, or in combination with antiplatelet therapy. This protective effect of statins on venous thromboembolism is protective effect seems to be independent of the other ve- possibly through non-lipid-lowering properties or pleiotro- nous thromboembolism risk factors, including history of pic effects of statins. metastatic cancer, immobilization, hormonal use, and obe- Regarding antiplatelet therapy, our study showed the sity. Prospective, randomized control trials cautiously in- benefit of both aspirin and clopidogrel on the occurrence of vestigating the suggested pleiotropic effect of statins are venous thromboembolism. Interestingly, dual antiplatelet warranted. therapy exerts a better outcome on subsequent venous thromboembolism compared with single antiplatelet therapy in this study population. Szczeklik et al35 suggested that aspirin impaired thrombin formation in both in vitro and ex vivo models by acetylating prothrombin or macromolecules ACKNOWLEDGMENT of platelet membrane. Our finding contradicts a randomized This study was approved by Institutional Review Board trial of healthy women that showed no clear benefit of (IRB) at Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA aspirin in terms of long-term prevention of venous throm- (IRB number – EX-579, Albert Einstein Medical Center). boembolism.36 As for clopidogrel, there are no recent stud- ies addressing the potential benefit of this drug on the References occurrence of venous thromboembolism. The possible im- 1. Piazza G, Goldhaber SZ. Venous thromboembolism and atherothrom- bosis: an integrated approach. Circulation. 2010;121:2146-2150. plication of dual antiplatelet therapy on the occurrence of 2. Rus HG, Vlaicu R, Niculescu F. Interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 pro- venous thromboembolism warrants further prospective tein and gene expression in human arterial atherosclerotic wall. Ath- studies. erosclerosis. 1996;127:263-271.
  • 8. Khemasuwan et al Statins for Venous Thrombosis Risk Reduction 859 3. Rus HG, Niculescu F, Vlaicu R. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha in human 20. Eisenstein EL, Anstrom KJ, Kong DF, et al. Clopidogrel and long-term arterial wall with atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 1991;89:247-254. outcomes after drug-elution stent implantation. JAMA. 2007;297:159- 4. van Aken BE, Reitsma PH, Rosendaal FR. Interleukin 8 and venous 168. thrombosis: evidence for a role of inflammation in thrombosis. Br J 21. Anderson FA Jr, Spencer FA. Risk factors for venous thromboembo- Haematol. 2002;116:173-177. lism. Circulation. 2003;107(23 Suppl 1):I9-I16. 5. van Aken BE, den Heijer M, Bos GM, et al. Recurrent venous throm- 22. Lacut K, Oger E, Le Gal G, et al. Statins but not fibrates are associated bosis and markers of inflammation. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83:536- with a reduced risk of venous thromboembolism: a hospital-based 539. case-control study. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2004;18:477-482. 6. Sørensen HT, Horvath-Puho E, Pedersen L, et al. Venous thrombo- 23. Yang CC, Jick SS, Jick H. Statins and the risk of idiopathic venous embolism and subsequent hospitalization due to acute arterial cardio- thromboembolism. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;53:101-105. vascular events: a 20-year cohort study. Lancet. 2007;370:1773-1779. 24. Ray JG, Mamdani M, Tsuyuki RT, Anderson DR, Yeo EL, Laupacis 7. Sorensen HT, Horvath-Puho E, Sogaard KK, et al. Arterial cardiovas- A. Use of statins and the subsequent development of deep vein throm- cular events, statins, low-dose aspirin and subsequent risk of venous bosis. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1405-1410. thromboembolism: a population-based case-control study. J Thromb 25. Ramcharan AS, Van Stralen KJ, Snoep JD, et al. HMG-CoA reductase Haemost. 2009;7:521-528. inhibitors, other lipid-lowering medication, antiplatelet therapy, and 8. Ageno W, Becattini C, Brighton T, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors the risk of venous thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7:514-520. and venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis. Circulation. 2008; 26. Herrington DM, Vittinghoff E, Lin F, et al. Statin therapy, cardiovas- 117:93-102. cular events, and total mortality in the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin 9. Ageno W, Prandoni P, Romualdi E, et al. The metabolic syndrome and Replacement Study (HERS). Circulation. 2002;105:2962-2967. the risk of venous thrombosis: a case-control study. J Thromb Hae- 27. Khemasuwan D, Divietro ML, Tangdhanakanond K, et al. Statins decrease the occurrence of venous thromboembolism in patients with most. 2006;4:1914-1918. cancer. Am J Med. 2010;123:60-65. 10. Sofi F, Marcucci R, Abbate R, et al. Lipoprotein (a) and venous 28. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent thromboembolism in adults: a meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2007;120: vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. 728-733. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195-2207. 11. Eichinger S, Pecheniuk NM, Hron G, et al. High-density lipoprotein 29. Glynn RJ, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, et al. A randomized trial of and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2007; rosuvastatin in the prevention of venous thromboembolism. N Engl 115:1609-1614. J Med. 2009;360:1851-1861. 12. Weng TC, Yang YH, Lin SJ, et al. A systematic review and meta- 30. Squizzato A, Galli M, Romualdi E, et al. Statins, fibrates, and venous analysis on the therapeutic equivalence of statins. J Clin Pharm Ther. thromboembolism: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:1248-1256. 2010;35:139-151. 31. Cannon CP, Steinberg BA, Murphy SA, et al. Meta-analysis of car- 13. Devaraj S, Chan E, Jialal I, et al. Direct demonstration of anti- diovascular outcomes trials comparing intensive versus moderate sta- inflammatory effect of simvastatin in subjects with the metabolic tin therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:438-445. syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:4489-4496. 32. Holst AG, Jensen G, Prescott E. Risk factors for venous thromboem- 14. Undas A, Brummel-Ziedins KE, Mann KG. Statins and blood coagu- bolism: results from the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Circulation. lation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:287-294. 2010;121:1896-1903. 15. Takemoto M, Liao JK. Pleiotropic effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglu- 33. Mahmoodi BK, Gansevoort RT, Veeger NJGM, et al; Prevention of taryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. Renal and Vascular End-stage Disease (PREVEND) Study Group. 2001;21:1712-1719. Microalbuminuria and risk of venous thromboembolism. JAMA. 2009; 16. Krysiak R, Okopien B, Herman ZS. Effects of HMG-CoA reductase ´ 301:1790-1797. inhibitors on coagulation and fibrinolysis processes. Drugs. 2003;63: 34. Chamberlain AM, Folsom AR, Heckbert SR, Rosamond WD, Cush- 1821-1854. man M. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and venous thromboem- 17. Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration. Collaborative meta-analysis bolism in the Longitudinal Investigation of Thromboembolism Etiol- of randomized trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, ogy (LITE). Blood. 2008;112:2675-2680. myocardial infarction, and stroke in high-risk patients. BMJ. 2002; 35. Szczeklik A, Krzanowski M, Góra P, et al. Antiplatelet drugs and 324:71-86. generation of thrombin in clotting blood. Blood. 1992;80:2006-2011. 18. Glynn RJ, Ridker PM, Goldhaber SZ, et al. Effect of low-dose aspirin 36. Glynn RJ, Ridker PM, Goldhaber SZ, et al. Effect of low-dose aspirin on the occurrence of venous thromboembolism: a randomized trial. on the occurrence of venous thromboembolism: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:525-533. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:525-533. 19. Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to 37. Santos MT, Fuset MP, Ruano M, et al. Effect of Atorvastatin on aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment platelet thromboxane A(2) synthesis in aspirin-treated patients with elevation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:494-502. acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104:1618-1623.