SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  19
Homework Help
https://www.homeworkping.com/
Research Paper help
https://www.homeworkping.com/
Online Tutoring
https://www.homeworkping.com/ Nike, Inc. - 2009
Case Notes Prepared by: Dr. Mernoush Banton
Case Author: Randy Harris
A. Case Abstract
Nike, Inc. (www.nike.com) is a comprehensive strategic management case that
includes the company’s fiscal May 31st
, 2009 financial statements, competitor
information and more. The case time setting is the year 2009. Sufficient internal
and external data are provided to enable students to evaluate current strategies
and recommend a three-year strategic plan for the company. Headquartered in
Beaverton (Bevartn), Oregon, Nike is traded on the New York Stock Exchange
under ticker symbol NKE.
B. Vision Statement (Actual)
“Bring inspiration and innovation to every athlete in the world.”
C. Mission Statement (Actual)
“To be the leading sports brand in the world.”
Mission Statement (Proposed)
As the largest seller of athletic footwear and athletic apparel in the world (2, 3),
we create products for consumers and athletics (1) who enjoy having quality
products that are high performance and reliable such as shoes, apparel, and
technologically advanced equipment) (4). Our dedicated employees (9)
continuously work on developing new products, price, and product identity
through marketing and promotion (7). The company aims to lead in corporate
citizenship (8) through proactive programs that reflect caring for the world family
of Nike (6) and by ensuring continuous growth and profitability to our investors
and stakeholders (5).
1. Customer
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
2. Products or services
3. Markets
4. Technology
5. Concern for survival, profitability, growth
6. Philosophy
7. Self-concept
8. Concern for public image
9. Concern for employees
D. External Audit
CPM – Competitive Profile Matrix
Nike Adidas Puma
Critical Success Factors
Weigh
t
Ratin
g
Weighte
d Score
Ratin
g
Weighte
d Score
Ratin
g
Weighted
Score
Price competitiveness 0.10 3 0.30 2 0.20 1 0.10
Global Expansion 0.07 4 0.28 3 0.21 2 0.14
Organizational Structure 0.04 3 0.12 1 0.04 1 0.04
Technology 0.09 3 0.27 1 0.09 2 0.18
Product Safety 0.15 2 0.30 3 0.45 4 0.60
Customer Loyalty 0.09 4 0.36 3 0.27 2 0.18
Market Share 0.09 4 0.36 3 0.27 2 0.18
Advertising 0.12 4 0.48 3 0.36 2 0.24
Product Quality 0.12 3 0.36 2 0.24 1 0.12
Product Image 0.07 4 0.28 3 0.21 2 0.14
Financial Position 0.06 4 0.24 3 0.18 2 0.12
Total 1.00 3.35 2.52 2.04
Opportunities
1. Younger consumers are less price sensitive and generally spend more on
casual and athletic footwear than older consumers
2. Most footwear companies have outsourced their production abroad in
order to maintain lower cost and R&D expenses
3. US footwear imports totaled 2.36 billion pairs in 2007, or roughly 7.9 pairs
per capita which is was up 0.4 percent from 2006
4. North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the World Trade
Organization (WTO), both helped eliminate quotas and tariff barriers for
foreign footwear manufacturers to ship their goods
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
5. The Internet allows footwear companies to pursue a direct to consumer
sales channel
6. Sales of apparel, accessories, and footwear on the Internet has been
growing at a double digit pace, considerably faster than more traditional
sales models such as retail stores
7. Internet sales of apparel, accessories, and footwear could reach 18
percent of category sales by 2012
8. Companies that added a Web-based sales strategy are able to customize
footwear and other merchandise directly to the customer’s needs and
taste, are enable to achieve considerably better pricing as well as
“deepening” the emotional bond consumers have with the brand
Threats
1. After the age of 40, the typical consumer is not willing to pay more than
$35 to $40 per pair for athletic footwear
2. Competition is strong among athletic footwear and apparel from off brand
companies
3. Fluctuation of foreign currency impacts the cost of importing goods to the
U.S.
4. Increase in unemployment has impacted the household income which
may result in spending less on brand name
5. Barrier to entry is low
6. Level of inventory is increasing in many retail stores due weak economy
External Factor Evaluation (EFE) Matrix
Key External Factors Weight Rating Weighted
Score
Opportunities
1. Younger consumers are less price sensitive and
generally spend more on casual and athletic
footwear than older consumers
0.08 3 0.24
2. Most footwear companies have outsourced their
production abroad in order to maintain lower cost
and R&D expenses
0.07 4 0.28
3. US footwear imports totaled 2.36 billion pairs in
2007, or roughly 7.9 pairs per capita which is was up
0.4 percent from 2006
0.07 3 0.21
4. North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and
the World Trade Organization (WTO), both helped
eliminate quotas and tariff barriers for foreign
footwear manufacturers to ship their goods
0.06 4 0.24
5. The Internet allows footwear companies to pursue a
direct to consumer sales channel
0.07 4 0.28
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
6. Sales of apparel, accessories, and footwear on the
Internet has been growing at a double digit pace,
considerably faster than more traditional sales
models such as retail stores
0.08 3 0.24
7. Internet sales of apparel, accessories, and footwear
could reach 18 percent of category sales by 2012
0.07 4 0.28
8. Companies that added a Web-based sales strategy
are able to customize footwear and other
merchandise directly to the customer's needs and
taste, are enable to achieve considerably better
pricing as well as "deepening" the emotional bond
consumers have with the brand
0.06 3 0.18
Threats
1. After the age of 40, the typical consumer is not
willing to pay more than $35 to $40 per pair for
athletic footwear
0.07 3 0.21
2. Competition is strong among athletic footwear and
apparel from off brand companies
0.08 2 0.16
3. Fluctuation of foreign currency impacts the cost of
importing goods to the U.S.
0.06 2 0.12
4. Increase in unemployment has impacted the
household income which may result in spending less
on brand name
0.09 3 0.27
5. Barrier to entry is low 0.06 2 0.12
6. Level of inventory is increasing in many retail stores
due weak economy
0.08 2 0.16
Total 1.00 2.99
Positioning Map
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
E. Internal Audit
Strengths
1. Nike is the dominant competitor for athletic footwear priced above $60 per
pair, holding better than a 50 percent market share for athletic footwear
priced $85 per pair or higher
2. Nike characterizes its organization as a collaborative matrix organization
3. The Jordan brand has a 10.8 percent share of the overall U.S. shoe
market, which makes it the second biggest brand in the country and more
than twice the size of Adidas’ share
4. Three out of every four pairs of basketball shoes sold in this country are
Jordan, while 86.5 percent of all basketball shoes sold over $100 are
Jordan
5. Nike’s 2009 revenues increased 2.9 percent to $19.1 billion
6. Inside the United States, Nike has three significant distribution and
customer service facilities
7. Nike estimates that they sell products to more than 25,000 retail accounts
in the United States and more than 27,000 retail accounts, including Nike-
owned stores and a mix of independent distributors and licensees outside
the United States
8. The company’s Internet Web site, www.nikebiz.com, allows customers to
design and purchase Nike products directly from the company
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Price (High)Price (low)
Customer Loyalty
(High)
Customer Loyalty
(Low)
Nike
Puma
Adidas
9. Nike has five wholly owned subsidiaries: Cole Haan, Converse, Hurley
International, NIKE Golf, and Umbro Ltd
Weaknesses
1. Nike’s 2009 net income decreased 21 percent to $1.48 billion
2. Almost all of Nike’s footwear is manufactured outside the United States by
independent contractors
3. In fiscal 2008, contract manufacturers in China, Vietnam, Indonesia, and
Thailand manufactured 99 percent of Nike’s footwear worldwide
4. Because Nike competes primarily in athletic footwear, apparel and related
sporting equipment, its sales are heavily concentrated in the youth and
young adult market
5. Accounts payable has increased by almost $1.0 billion in 2009
6. Negative publicity and boycotting of the Nike products due to outsourcing
jobs overseas and the use of child labor in such factories
Financial Ratio Analysis (December 2009)
Growth Rates % Nike Industry S&P 500
Sales (Qtr vs year ago qtr) -4.00 -2.10 -4.80
Net Income (YTD vs YTD) -1.50 -2.00 -6.00
Net Income (Qtr vs year ago qtr) -4.00 -1.60 26.80
Sales (5-Year Annual Avg.) 9.37 14.53 12.99
Net Income (5-Year Annual Avg.) 9.47 11.78 12.69
Dividends (5-Year Annual Avg.) 21.51 14.72 11.83
Price Ratios Nike Industry S&P 500
Current P/E Ratio 22.0 25.7 26.7
P/E Ratio 5-Year High 23.5 0.9 16.6
P/E Ratio 5-Year Low 10.7 0.2 2.6
Price/Sales Ratio 1.75 2.10 2.25
Price/Book Value 3.49 3.96 3.48
Price/Cash Flow Ratio 17.50 17.70 13.70
Profit Margins % Nike Industry S&P 500
Gross Margin 44.5 49.2 38.9
Pre-Tax Margin 10.3 14.4 10.3
Net Profit Margin 8.0 10.1 7.1
5Yr Gross Margin (5-Year Avg.) 44.5 51.7 38.6
5Yr PreTax Margin (5-Year Avg.) 12.9 18.2 16.6
5Yr Net Profit Margin (5-Year Avg.) 9.0 12.1 11.5
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Financial Condition Nike Industry S&P 500
Debt/Equity Ratio 0.06 0.06 1.09
Current Ratio 3.5 3.5 1.5
Quick Ratio 2.7 2.6 1.3
Interest Coverage 223.8 139.0 23.7
Leverage Ratio 1.4 1.4 3.4
Book Value/Share 18.94 15.21 21.63
Adapted from www.moneycentral.msn.com
Avg P/E Price/ Sales Price/ Book
Net Profit
Margin (%)
05/09 17.80 1.46 3.19 7.8
05/08 16.40 1.85 4.29 10.1
05/07 16.10 1.77 4.05 9.1
05/06 16.00 1.42 3.27 9.3
05/05 18.00 1.62 3.80 8.8
05/04 18.40 1.57 3.91 7.7
05/03 17.20 1.40 3.70 6.9
05/02 21.30 1.48 3.73 6.8
05/01 20.10 1.18 3.16 6.2
05/00 23.00 1.33 3.69 6.4
Book Value/
Share
Debt/
Equity
Return on
Equity (%)
Return on
Assets (%)
Interest
Coverage
05/09 $17.91 0.09 17.1 11.2 NA
05/08 $15.93 0.08 24.1 15.1 NA
05/07 $14.00 0.08 21.2 14.0 NA
05/06 $12.28 0.11 22.1 14.1 NA
05/05 $10.81 0.14 21.5 13.8 NA
05/04 $9.09 0.17 19.8 12.0 36.6
05/03 $7.57 0.21 18.5 10.9 26.8
05/02 $7.21 0.29 17.4 10.4 22.1
05/01 $6.51 0.37 16.9 10.1 15.7
05/00 $5.82 0.46 18.5 9.9 20.4
Adapted from www.moneycentral.msn.com
Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) Matrix
Key Internal Factors Weight Rating Weighted
Score
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Strengths
1. Nike is the dominant competitor for athletic
footwear priced above $60 per pair, holding
better than a 50 percent market share for
athletic footwear priced $85 per pair or higher
0.08 4 0.32
2. Nike characterizes its organization as a
collaborative matrix organization
0.02 3 0.06
3. The Jordan brand has a 10.8 percent share of
the overall U.S. shoe market, which makes it
the second biggest brand in the country and
more than twice the size of Adidas' share
0.06 4 0.24
4. Three out of every four pairs of basketball
shoes sold in this country are Jordan, while
86.5 percent of all basketball shoes sold over
$100 are Jordan
0.08 4 0.32
5. Nike's 2009 revenues increased 2.9 percent
to $19.1 billion
0.09 4 0.36
6. Inside the United States, Nike has three
significant distribution and customer service
facilities
0.05 3 0.15
7. Nike estimates that they sell products to more
than 25,000 retail accounts in the United
States and more than 27,000 retail accounts,
including Nike-owned stores and a mix of
independent distributors and licensees
outside the United States
0.04 3 0.12
8. The company's Internet Web site,
www.nikebiz.com, allows customers to design
and purchase Nike products directly from the
company
0.07 4 0.28
9. Nike has five wholly owned subsidiaries: Cole
Haan, Converse, Hurley International, NIKE
Golf, and Umbro Ltd
0.07 3 0.21
Weaknesses
1. Nike's 2009 net income decreased 21 percent
to $1.48 billion
0.07 2 0.14
2. Almost all of Nike's footwear is manufactured
outside the United States by independent
contractors
0.08 1 0.08
3. In fiscal 2008, contract manufacturers in
China, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand
manufactured 99 percent of Nike's footwear
worldwide
0.06 1 0.06
4. Because Nike competes primarily in athletic
footwear, apparel and related sporting
equipment, its sales are heavily concentrated
in the youth and young adult market.
0.08 1 0.08
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
5. Accounts payable has increased by almost
$1.0 billion in 2009
0.08 2 0.16
6. Negative publicity and boycotting of the Nike
products due to outsourcing jobs overseas
and the use of child labor in such factories
0.07 1 0.07
Total 1.00 2.65
F. SWOT Strategies
Strengths Weaknesses
1. Nike is the dominant
competitor for athletic
footwear priced above
$60 per pair, holding
better than a 50 percent
market share for athletic
footwear priced $85 per
pair or higher
2. Nike characterizes its
organization as a
collaborative matrix
organization
3. The Jordan brand has a
10.8 percent share of
the overall U.S. shoe
market, which makes it
the second biggest
brand in the country and
more than twice the size
of Adidas’ share
4. Three out of every four
pairs of basketball
shoes sold in this
country are Jordan,
while 86.5 percent of all
basketball shoes sold
over $100 are Jordan
5. Nike’s 2009 revenues
increased 2.9 percent to
$19.1 billion
6. Inside the United States,
Nike has three
significant distribution
and customer service
1. Nike’s 2009 net income
decreased 21 percent to
$1.48 billion
2. Almost all of Nike’s
footwear is
manufactured outside
the United States by
independent contractors
3. In fiscal 2008, contract
manufacturers in China,
Vietnam, Indonesia, and
Thailand manufactured
99 percent of Nike’s
footwear worldwide
4. Because Nike competes
primarily in athletic
footwear, apparel and
related sporting
equipment, its sales are
heavily concentrated in
the youth and young
adult market
5. Accounts payable has
increased by almost
$1.0 billion in 2009
6. Negative publicity and
boycotting of the Nike
products due to
outsourcing jobs
overseas and the use of
child labor in such
factories
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
facilities
7. Nike estimates that they
sell products to more
than 25,000 retail
accounts in the United
States and more than
27,000 retail accounts,
including Nike-owned
stores and a mix of
independent distributors
and licensees outside
the United States
8. The company’s Internet
Web site,
www.nikebiz.com,
allows customers to
design and purchase
Nike products directly
from the company
9. Nike has five wholly
owned subsidiaries:
Cole Haan, Converse,
Hurley International,
NIKE Golf, and Umbro
Ltd
Opportunities
S-O Strategies
W-O Strategies
1. Younger consumers are
less price sensitive and
generally spend more
on casual and athletic
footwear than older
consumers
2. Most footwear
companies have
outsourced their
production abroad in
order to maintain lower
cost and R&D expenses
3. US footwear imports
totaled 2.36 billion pairs
in 2007, or roughly 7.9
pairs per capita which is
was up 0.4 percent from
2006
1. Expand into
international market
more where the
economy is stronger
(S1, S3, S4, S7, O1)
2. Increase advertising and
promotion through
social networking such
as Twitter and
Facebook (S8, O1, O5,
O7)
1. Develop new products
for small kids based on
cartoon characters (W4,
O1, O3)
2. Sponsor more athletics
programs, mostly for
young generation (W1,
W4, W6, O1, O2, O3)
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4. North American Free
Trade Agreement
(NAFTA) and the World
Trade Organization
(WTO), both helped
eliminate quotas and
tariff barriers for foreign
footwear manufacturers
to ship their goods
5. The Internet allows
footwear companies to
pursue a direct to
consumer sales channel
6. Sales of apparel,
accessories, and
footwear on the Internet
has been growing at a
double digit pace,
considerably faster than
more traditional sales
models such as retail
stores
7. Internet sales of
apparel, accessories,
and footwear could
reach 18 percent of
category sales by 2012
8. Companies that added a
Web-based sales
strategy are able to
customize footwear and
other merchandise
directly to the
customer’s needs and
taste, are enable to
achieve considerably
better pricing as well as
“deepening” the
emotional bond
consumers have with
the brand
Threats
S-T Strategies
W-T Strategies
1. After the age of 40, the
typical consumer is not
willing to pay more than
1. Develop a new
moderately priced
product line (S1, S2, S3,
1. Make low priced
footwear made in the US
and promote it as “Made
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
$35 to $40 per pair for
athletic footwear
2. Competition is strong
among athletic footwear
and apparel from off
brand companies
3. Fluctuation of foreign
currency impacts the
cost of importing goods
to the U.S.
4. Increase in
unemployment has
impacted the household
income which may
result in spending less
on brand name
5. Barrier to entry is low
6. Level of inventory is
increasing in many retail
stores due weak
economy
S4, T2, T4, T6)
2. Expand distribution by
selling to stores other
than their own retailers
(S7, T2)
in America” (W2, W6,
T2, T3, T4, T6)
2. Acquire a less
expensive brand of
accessories and
sportswear and promote
them as an off brand of
Nike (W4, W6, T1, T4,
T6)
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
G. SPACE Matrix
Financial Stability (FS) Environmental Stability (ES)
Return on Investment 4 Unemployment -4
Leverage 5 Technological Changes -4
Liquidity 3 Price Elasticity of Demand -5
Working Capital 3 Competitive Pressure -5
Cash Flow 4 Barriers to Entry -5
Financial Stability (FS) Average 3.8 Environmental Stability (ES) Average -4.6
Competitive Stability (CS) Industry Stability (IS)
Market Share -1 Growth Potential 5
Product Quality -2 Financial Stability 4
Customer Loyalty -3 Ease of Market Entry 1
Competition’s Capacity Utilization -1 Resource Utilization 3
Technological Know-How -4 Profit Potential 4
Competitive Stability (CS) Average -2.2 Industry Stability (IS) Average 3.4
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
FS
CS
ES
IS
654321
Conservative Aggressive
CompetitiveDefensive
1
2
3
4
5
6
7-2-3-4-5-7 -1-6
7
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
Y-axis: FS + ES = 3.8 + (-4.6) = - 0.8
X-axis: CS + IS = (-2.2) + (3.4) = 1.2
H. Grand Strategy Matrix
1. Market development
2. Market penetration
3. Product development
4. Forward integration
5. Backward integration
6. Horizontal integration
7. Related diversification
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Weak
Competitive
Position
Quadrant II
Quadrant I
Quadrant IV
Quadrant III
Strong
Competitive
Position
Rapid Market Growth
Slow Market Growth
I. The Internal-External (IE) Matrix
The IFE Total Weighted Score
Strong
3.0 to 4.0
Average
2.0 to 2.99
Weak
1.0 to 1.99
High
3.0 to 3.99
I II III
Medium
2.0 to 2.99
IV IV
Nike, Inc.
VI
Low
1.0 to 1.99
VII VIII IX
J. QSPM
Increase
advertising
and
promotion
through
social
networking
such as
Twitter and
Facebook
Acquire a less
expensive
brand of
accessories
and
sportswear
and promote
them as an
off brand of
Nike
Key Factors Weight AS TAS AS TAS
Opportunities
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
The EFE Total
Weighted
Score
1. Younger consumers are less price sensitive
and generally spend more on casual and
athletic footwear than older consumers
0.08 1 0.08 4 0.32
2. Most footwear companies have outsourced
their production abroad in order to maintain
lower cost and R&D expenses
0.07 --- --- --- ---
3. US footwear imports totaled 2.36 billion
pairs in 2007, or roughly 7.9 pairs per capita
which is was up 0.4 percent from 2006
0.07 --- --- --- ---
4. North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA) and the World Trade Organization
(WTO), both helped eliminate quotas and
tariff barriers for foreign footwear
manufacturers to ship their goods
0.06 2 0.12 3 0.18
5. The Internet allows footwear companies to
pursue a direct to consumer sales channel
0.07 --- --- --- ---
6. Sales of apparel, accessories, and footwear
on the Internet has been growing at a
double digit pace, considerably faster than
more traditional sales models such as retail
stores
0.08 2 0.16 4 0.32
7. Internet sales of apparel, accessories, and
footwear could reach 18 percent of category
sales by 2012
0.07 4 0.28 1 0.07
8. Companies that added a Web-based sales
strategy are able to customize footwear and
other merchandise directly to the
customer's needs and taste, are enable to
achieve considerably better pricing as well
as "deepening" the emotional bond
consumers have with the brand
0.06 4 0.24 1 0.06
Threats
1. After the age of 40, the typical consumer is
not willing to pay more than $35 to $40 per
pair for athletic footwear
0.07 1 0.07 4 0.28
2. Competition is strong among athletic
footwear and apparel from off brand
companies
0.08 --- --- --- ---
3. Fluctuation of foreign currency impacts the
cost of importing goods to the U.S.
0.06 --- --- --- ---
4. Increase in unemployment has impacted
the household income which may result in
spending less on brand name
0.09 1 0.09 3 0.27
5. Barrier to entry is low 0.06 --- --- --- ---
6. Level of inventory is increasing in many
retail stores due weak economy
0.08 4 0.32 2 0.16
TOTAL 1.00 1.36 1.66
Strengths
1. Nike is the dominant competitor for athletic
footwear priced above $60 per pair, holding
0.08 --- --- --- ---
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
better than a 50 percent market share for
athletic footwear priced $85 per pair or
higher
2. Nike characterizes its organization as a
collaborative matrix organization
0.02 --- --- --- ---
3. The Jordan brand has a 10.8 percent share
of the overall U.S. shoe market, which
makes it the second biggest brand in the
country and more than twice the size of
Adidas' share
0.06 3 0.18 1 0.06
4. Three out of every four pairs of basketball
shoes sold in this country are Jordan, while
86.5 percent of all basketball shoes sold
over $100 are Jordan
0.08 3 0.24 1 0.08
5. Nike's 2009 revenues increased 2.9 percent
to $19.1 billion
0.09 --- --- --- ---
6. Inside the United States, Nike has three
significant distribution and customer service
facilities
0.05 --- --- --- ---
7. Nike estimates that they sell products to
more than 25,000 retail accounts in the
United States and more than 27,000 retail
accounts, including Nike-owned stores and
a mix of independent distributors and
licensees outside the United States
0.04 3 0.12 4 0.16
8. The company's Internet Web site,
www.nikebiz.com, allows customers to
design and purchase Nike products directly
from the company
0.07 4 0.28 1 0.07
9. Nike has five wholly owned subsidiaries:
Cole Haan, Converse, Hurley International,
NIKE Golf, and Umbro Ltd
0.07 1 0.07 3 0.21
Weaknesses
1. Nike's 2009 net income decreased 21
percent to $1.48 billion
0.07 1 0.07 3 0.21
2. Almost all of Nike's footwear is
manufactured outside the United States by
independent contractors
0.08 --- --- --- ---
3. In fiscal 2008, contract manufacturers in
China, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand
manufactured 99 percent of Nike's footwear
worldwide
0.06 --- --- --- ---
4. Because Nike competes primarily in athletic
footwear, apparel and related sporting
equipment, its sales are heavily
concentrated in the youth and young adult
market
0.08 1 0.08 3 0.24
5. Accounts payable has increased by almost
$1.0 billion in 2009
0.08 --- --- --- ---
6. Negative publicity and boycotting of the 0.07 --- --- --- ---
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Nike products due to outsourcing jobs
overseas and the use of child labor in such
factories
SUBTOTAL 1.00 1.04 1.03
SUM TOTAL ATTRACTIVENESS SCORE 2.4 2.69
K. Recommendations
Acquire a company who manufactures and sells less expensive products than Nike. The
company should have established distribution and retail shelf space with non-competing
product lines. It would be ideal if the company is a U.S. based corporation with domestic
manufacturing facilities.
L. EPS/EBIT Analysis
$ Amount Needed: $350 million
Stock Price: $65.65
Tax Rate: 24%
Interest Rate: 4.75% (Estimated)
# Shares Outstanding: 487 Million
Common Stock Financing Debt Financing
Recession Normal Boom Recession Normal Boom
EBIT $1,800,000,000 $2,500,000,000 $3,500,000,000 $1,800,000,000 $2,500,000,000 $3,500,000,000
Interest 0 0 0 16,625,000 16,625,000 16,625,000
EBT 1,800,000,000 2,500,000,000 3,500,000,000 1,783,375,000 2,483,375,000 3,483,375,000
Taxes 432,000,000 600,000,000 840,000,000 428,010,000 596,010,000 836,010,000
EAT 1,368,000,000 1,900,000,000 2,660,000,000 1,355,365,000 1,887,365,000 2,647,365,000
# Shares 492,331,302 492,331,302 492,331,302 487,000,000 487,000,000 487,000,000
EPS 2.78 3.86 5.40 2.78 3.88 5.44
70 Percent Stock - 30 Percent Debt 70 Percent Debt - 30 Percent Stock
Recession Normal Boom Recession Normal Boom
EBIT $1,800,000,000 $2,500,000,000 $3,500,000,000 $1,800,000,000 $2,500,000,000 $3,500,000,000
Interest 13,300,000 13,300,000 13,300,000 3,325,000 3,325,000 3,325,000
EBT 1,786,700,000 2,486,700,000 3,486,700,000 1,796,675,000 2,496,675,000 3,496,675,000
Taxes 428,808,000 596,808,000 836,808,000 431,202,000 599,202,000 839,202,000
EAT 1,357,892,000 1,889,892,000 2,649,892,000 1,365,473,000 1,897,473,000 2,657,473,000
# Shares 490,731,912 490,731,912 490,731,912 488,599,391 488,599,391 488,599,391
EPS 2.77 3.85 5.40 2.79 3.88 5.44
M. Epilogue
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Analysts expect that Nike will be able to boast of its strong earnings, growing
gross margins, lean inventories and all-important futures orders. The company
has booming international business, especially its China expansion plans, as well
as next month’s World Cup, where Nike is sponsoring nine teams. And investors
may find out what management has planned for that $7 a share in net cash on
the balance sheets. (CNBC.com)
Nike unveiled its supercharged Nike Elite Series football boots providing new
levels of performance. Nike’s Mercurial Vapor SuperFly II, CTR360 Maestri,
Total90 Laser III and Tiempo Legend III all feature new performance upper to
improve on-field visibility and a reengineered outsole to deliver lightweight
performance for every style of player. Nike designers have reduced the weight
of each boot so players can perform at their best. Lightweight construction,
intricate engineering, carbon-enforced strength and high contrast colors
distinguish the boots. The high contrast colors (Metallic Mach Purple and Total
Orange) are engineered together for enhanced visibility. For a footballer this
unique combination is designed to increase visual performance enabling them to
quickly spot their teammates and execute a game-changing pass. “At Nike, we
have a relentless focus on product innovation to give athletes a real competitive
edge and deliver the best products in the world,” said Andrew Caine, Nike Design
Director for Football Footwear. “The Nike Elite Series delivers lightweight and
highly engineered boots for the leading players in the world to perform on the
biggest stage this summer.” (finance.yahoo.com)
Jordan Brand, a division of NIKE, Inc., announced that the top 10 ranked ESPNU
100 players – No. 1 Harrison Barnes (Ames, IA/North Carolina), No. 2 Jared
Sullinger (Columbus, OH/Ohio State), No. 3 Brandon Knight (Coral Springs,
FL/Undecided), No. 4 Kyrie Irving (West Orange, NJ/Duke), No. 5 Tobias Harris
(Dix Hills, NY/Tennessee), No. 6 Will Barton (Baltimore, MD/Memphis), No. 7
Josh Selby (Baltimore, MD/Undecided), No. 8 C.J. Leslie (Holly Springs,
NC/Undecided), No. 9 Perry Jones (Duncanville, TX/Baylor) and No. 10 Tristan
Thompson (Brampton, ONT/Texas) – will headline the nation’s best high school
senior basketball players at the 2010 Jordan Brand Classic, presented by Foot
Locker, at Madison Square Garden in New York City on Saturday, April 17 at
8:00 p.m. EST. This year’s event will once again be televised nationally live on
ESPN2. The Jordan Brand Classic will also continue to include a Regional
Game, showcasing the top prep players from the New York City metropolitan
area in a City vs. Suburbs showdown. In its third year of the event, an
International Game will feature 16 of the top 17-and-under players from around
the world.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Under armour case analysis by Njinyah Ciro
Under armour case analysis by Njinyah CiroUnder armour case analysis by Njinyah Ciro
Under armour case analysis by Njinyah Ciro
Ciro Njinyah
 
Nike Strategic Case Analysis
Nike Strategic Case AnalysisNike Strategic Case Analysis
Nike Strategic Case Analysis
William Greene
 
Nike Internal-External Assessment
Nike Internal-External AssessmentNike Internal-External Assessment
Nike Internal-External Assessment
kelly kusmulyono
 
Nike competitive analysis
Nike competitive analysisNike competitive analysis
Nike competitive analysis
Khalid Hossain
 
Supply Chain Management-Nike
Supply Chain Management-NikeSupply Chain Management-Nike
Supply Chain Management-Nike
Ihab Itani
 

Tendances (20)

Nike Strategic Management
Nike Strategic ManagementNike Strategic Management
Nike Strategic Management
 
Under armour case analysis by Njinyah Ciro
Under armour case analysis by Njinyah CiroUnder armour case analysis by Njinyah Ciro
Under armour case analysis by Njinyah Ciro
 
Nike Strategic Case Analysis
Nike Strategic Case AnalysisNike Strategic Case Analysis
Nike Strategic Case Analysis
 
Nike Case Study
Nike Case StudyNike Case Study
Nike Case Study
 
NIKE perceptual positioning map
NIKE perceptual positioning mapNIKE perceptual positioning map
NIKE perceptual positioning map
 
Successes Factors of NIKE's Growth!!
Successes Factors of NIKE's Growth!!Successes Factors of NIKE's Growth!!
Successes Factors of NIKE's Growth!!
 
Nike
NikeNike
Nike
 
Nike Internal-External Assessment
Nike Internal-External AssessmentNike Internal-External Assessment
Nike Internal-External Assessment
 
Strategic Analysis of Nike, Under Armour & IMG
Strategic Analysis of Nike, Under Armour & IMGStrategic Analysis of Nike, Under Armour & IMG
Strategic Analysis of Nike, Under Armour & IMG
 
Nike competitive analysis
Nike competitive analysisNike competitive analysis
Nike competitive analysis
 
Nike brand analysis
Nike brand analysisNike brand analysis
Nike brand analysis
 
Presentation nike finance marketing india asia
Presentation nike finance marketing india asiaPresentation nike finance marketing india asia
Presentation nike finance marketing india asia
 
Adidas Brand Study
Adidas Brand StudyAdidas Brand Study
Adidas Brand Study
 
Nike Internal Analysis
Nike Internal AnalysisNike Internal Analysis
Nike Internal Analysis
 
Nike financial analysis
Nike financial analysisNike financial analysis
Nike financial analysis
 
NIKE CASE STUDY
NIKE CASE STUDYNIKE CASE STUDY
NIKE CASE STUDY
 
Nike_Marketing Policy
Nike_Marketing PolicyNike_Marketing Policy
Nike_Marketing Policy
 
@Nike Presentation
@Nike Presentation@Nike Presentation
@Nike Presentation
 
Supply Chain Management-Nike
Supply Chain Management-NikeSupply Chain Management-Nike
Supply Chain Management-Nike
 
Nike Case Study (Building a Global Brand Image)
Nike Case Study (Building a Global Brand Image)Nike Case Study (Building a Global Brand Image)
Nike Case Study (Building a Global Brand Image)
 

En vedette (12)

Csr Report on Case 17
Csr Report on Case 17Csr Report on Case 17
Csr Report on Case 17
 
Nike 2010
Nike 2010Nike 2010
Nike 2010
 
Nike Strategy 2010
Nike Strategy  2010Nike Strategy  2010
Nike Strategy 2010
 
Brand Managment: Nike; Building A Global Brand Case Analysis
Brand Managment: Nike; Building A Global Brand Case AnalysisBrand Managment: Nike; Building A Global Brand Case Analysis
Brand Managment: Nike; Building A Global Brand Case Analysis
 
Nike presentation
Nike presentationNike presentation
Nike presentation
 
Puma project(comp)
Puma project(comp)Puma project(comp)
Puma project(comp)
 
Puma
PumaPuma
Puma
 
Nike, inc. presentation
Nike, inc. presentationNike, inc. presentation
Nike, inc. presentation
 
Apollo Hospitals
Apollo HospitalsApollo Hospitals
Apollo Hospitals
 
Business Plan For Adidas
Business Plan For AdidasBusiness Plan For Adidas
Business Plan For Adidas
 
Nike ppt
Nike ppt Nike ppt
Nike ppt
 
Nike: Marketing Strategies
Nike: Marketing StrategiesNike: Marketing Strategies
Nike: Marketing Strategies
 

Similaire à 234613740 41082023-nike-case

ProblemThis is a comprehensive problem all contained on this sprea.docx
ProblemThis is a comprehensive problem all contained on this sprea.docxProblemThis is a comprehensive problem all contained on this sprea.docx
ProblemThis is a comprehensive problem all contained on this sprea.docx
briancrawford30935
 
CREDIT MODEL ANALYSIS
CREDIT MODEL ANALYSISCREDIT MODEL ANALYSIS
CREDIT MODEL ANALYSIS
Kriti Mittal
 
Success report on_marketing_strategy_for_nike_inc
Success report on_marketing_strategy_for_nike_incSuccess report on_marketing_strategy_for_nike_inc
Success report on_marketing_strategy_for_nike_inc
Neenad Mba
 
Nike Case write up
Nike Case write upNike Case write up
Nike Case write up
Fred Sosa
 
Nike International Business
Nike International BusinessNike International Business
Nike International Business
Adnan Abdullah
 
1Running head NIKE COMPANYPAGE 12NIKE COMPANYNIKE C.docx
1Running head  NIKE COMPANYPAGE  12NIKE COMPANYNIKE C.docx1Running head  NIKE COMPANYPAGE  12NIKE COMPANYNIKE C.docx
1Running head NIKE COMPANYPAGE 12NIKE COMPANYNIKE C.docx
eugeniadean34240
 
Nike Brigade Store Project
Nike Brigade Store ProjectNike Brigade Store Project
Nike Brigade Store Project
Abhishek Vats
 
Nike Environmental Analysis
Nike Environmental AnalysisNike Environmental Analysis
Nike Environmental Analysis
kelly kusmulyono
 
Nike Initiating Coverage Report
Nike Initiating Coverage ReportNike Initiating Coverage Report
Nike Initiating Coverage Report
Kevin "Kevo" Vo
 

Similaire à 234613740 41082023-nike-case (20)

Nike Creating Sahred value
Nike Creating Sahred valueNike Creating Sahred value
Nike Creating Sahred value
 
Samta Khinda - Industry Analysis Presentation NIKE
Samta Khinda - Industry Analysis Presentation NIKESamta Khinda - Industry Analysis Presentation NIKE
Samta Khinda - Industry Analysis Presentation NIKE
 
ProblemThis is a comprehensive problem all contained on this sprea.docx
ProblemThis is a comprehensive problem all contained on this sprea.docxProblemThis is a comprehensive problem all contained on this sprea.docx
ProblemThis is a comprehensive problem all contained on this sprea.docx
 
Nike competitive analysis
Nike competitive analysisNike competitive analysis
Nike competitive analysis
 
CREDIT MODEL ANALYSIS
CREDIT MODEL ANALYSISCREDIT MODEL ANALYSIS
CREDIT MODEL ANALYSIS
 
Nike's pricing strategies
Nike's pricing strategiesNike's pricing strategies
Nike's pricing strategies
 
Success report on_marketing_strategy_for_nike_inc
Success report on_marketing_strategy_for_nike_incSuccess report on_marketing_strategy_for_nike_inc
Success report on_marketing_strategy_for_nike_inc
 
FINAL REPORT
FINAL REPORTFINAL REPORT
FINAL REPORT
 
Nike Case write up
Nike Case write upNike Case write up
Nike Case write up
 
Marketing Strategy Plan_Nike athletic shoes_2019
Marketing Strategy Plan_Nike athletic shoes_2019Marketing Strategy Plan_Nike athletic shoes_2019
Marketing Strategy Plan_Nike athletic shoes_2019
 
Assignment on Marketing Plan of Nike shoes
Assignment on Marketing Plan of Nike shoes Assignment on Marketing Plan of Nike shoes
Assignment on Marketing Plan of Nike shoes
 
Nike International Business
Nike International BusinessNike International Business
Nike International Business
 
1Running head NIKE COMPANYPAGE 12NIKE COMPANYNIKE C.docx
1Running head  NIKE COMPANYPAGE  12NIKE COMPANYNIKE C.docx1Running head  NIKE COMPANYPAGE  12NIKE COMPANYNIKE C.docx
1Running head NIKE COMPANYPAGE 12NIKE COMPANYNIKE C.docx
 
Nike Brigade Store Project
Nike Brigade Store ProjectNike Brigade Store Project
Nike Brigade Store Project
 
Nike project
Nike projectNike project
Nike project
 
Zara Case Study Swot Analysis And Pestle Analysis
Zara Case Study Swot Analysis And Pestle AnalysisZara Case Study Swot Analysis And Pestle Analysis
Zara Case Study Swot Analysis And Pestle Analysis
 
Interim Report Breeze
Interim Report BreezeInterim Report Breeze
Interim Report Breeze
 
Nike Environmental Analysis
Nike Environmental AnalysisNike Environmental Analysis
Nike Environmental Analysis
 
A4 market analysis_diazcales
A4 market analysis_diazcalesA4 market analysis_diazcales
A4 market analysis_diazcales
 
Nike Initiating Coverage Report
Nike Initiating Coverage ReportNike Initiating Coverage Report
Nike Initiating Coverage Report
 

Plus de homeworkping3

Plus de homeworkping3 (20)

238304497 case-digest
238304497 case-digest238304497 case-digest
238304497 case-digest
 
238247664 crim1 cases-2
238247664 crim1 cases-2238247664 crim1 cases-2
238247664 crim1 cases-2
 
238234981 swamping-and-spoonfeeding
238234981 swamping-and-spoonfeeding238234981 swamping-and-spoonfeeding
238234981 swamping-and-spoonfeeding
 
238218643 jit final-manual-of-power-elx
238218643 jit final-manual-of-power-elx238218643 jit final-manual-of-power-elx
238218643 jit final-manual-of-power-elx
 
238103493 stat con-cases-set
238103493 stat con-cases-set238103493 stat con-cases-set
238103493 stat con-cases-set
 
238097308 envi-cases-full
238097308 envi-cases-full238097308 envi-cases-full
238097308 envi-cases-full
 
238057402 forestry
238057402 forestry238057402 forestry
238057402 forestry
 
238057020 envi-air-water
238057020 envi-air-water238057020 envi-air-water
238057020 envi-air-water
 
238056086 t6-g6
238056086 t6-g6238056086 t6-g6
238056086 t6-g6
 
238019494 rule-06-kinds-of-pleadings
238019494 rule-06-kinds-of-pleadings238019494 rule-06-kinds-of-pleadings
238019494 rule-06-kinds-of-pleadings
 
237978847 pipin-study-7
237978847 pipin-study-7237978847 pipin-study-7
237978847 pipin-study-7
 
237968686 evs-1
237968686 evs-1237968686 evs-1
237968686 evs-1
 
237962770 arthur-lim-et-case
237962770 arthur-lim-et-case237962770 arthur-lim-et-case
237962770 arthur-lim-et-case
 
237922817 city-cell
237922817 city-cell237922817 city-cell
237922817 city-cell
 
237778794 ethical-issues-case-studies
237778794 ethical-issues-case-studies237778794 ethical-issues-case-studies
237778794 ethical-issues-case-studies
 
237768769 case
237768769 case237768769 case
237768769 case
 
237754196 case-study
237754196 case-study237754196 case-study
237754196 case-study
 
237750650 labour-turnover
237750650 labour-turnover237750650 labour-turnover
237750650 labour-turnover
 
237712710 case-study
237712710 case-study237712710 case-study
237712710 case-study
 
237654933 mathematics-t-form-6
237654933 mathematics-t-form-6237654933 mathematics-t-form-6
237654933 mathematics-t-form-6
 

Dernier

The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
negromaestrong
 
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
ZurliaSoop
 

Dernier (20)

The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
 
Making communications land - Are they received and understood as intended? we...
Making communications land - Are they received and understood as intended? we...Making communications land - Are they received and understood as intended? we...
Making communications land - Are they received and understood as intended? we...
 
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
 
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan FellowsOn National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
 
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning PresentationSOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
Spatium Project Simulation student brief
Spatium Project Simulation student briefSpatium Project Simulation student brief
Spatium Project Simulation student brief
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
 
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
Third Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptx
Third Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptxThird Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptx
Third Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptx
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
 
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
PROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docxPROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docx
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
 

234613740 41082023-nike-case

  • 1. Homework Help https://www.homeworkping.com/ Research Paper help https://www.homeworkping.com/ Online Tutoring https://www.homeworkping.com/ Nike, Inc. - 2009 Case Notes Prepared by: Dr. Mernoush Banton Case Author: Randy Harris A. Case Abstract Nike, Inc. (www.nike.com) is a comprehensive strategic management case that includes the company’s fiscal May 31st , 2009 financial statements, competitor information and more. The case time setting is the year 2009. Sufficient internal and external data are provided to enable students to evaluate current strategies and recommend a three-year strategic plan for the company. Headquartered in Beaverton (Bevartn), Oregon, Nike is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under ticker symbol NKE. B. Vision Statement (Actual) “Bring inspiration and innovation to every athlete in the world.” C. Mission Statement (Actual) “To be the leading sports brand in the world.” Mission Statement (Proposed) As the largest seller of athletic footwear and athletic apparel in the world (2, 3), we create products for consumers and athletics (1) who enjoy having quality products that are high performance and reliable such as shoes, apparel, and technologically advanced equipment) (4). Our dedicated employees (9) continuously work on developing new products, price, and product identity through marketing and promotion (7). The company aims to lead in corporate citizenship (8) through proactive programs that reflect caring for the world family of Nike (6) and by ensuring continuous growth and profitability to our investors and stakeholders (5). 1. Customer Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
  • 2. 2. Products or services 3. Markets 4. Technology 5. Concern for survival, profitability, growth 6. Philosophy 7. Self-concept 8. Concern for public image 9. Concern for employees D. External Audit CPM – Competitive Profile Matrix Nike Adidas Puma Critical Success Factors Weigh t Ratin g Weighte d Score Ratin g Weighte d Score Ratin g Weighted Score Price competitiveness 0.10 3 0.30 2 0.20 1 0.10 Global Expansion 0.07 4 0.28 3 0.21 2 0.14 Organizational Structure 0.04 3 0.12 1 0.04 1 0.04 Technology 0.09 3 0.27 1 0.09 2 0.18 Product Safety 0.15 2 0.30 3 0.45 4 0.60 Customer Loyalty 0.09 4 0.36 3 0.27 2 0.18 Market Share 0.09 4 0.36 3 0.27 2 0.18 Advertising 0.12 4 0.48 3 0.36 2 0.24 Product Quality 0.12 3 0.36 2 0.24 1 0.12 Product Image 0.07 4 0.28 3 0.21 2 0.14 Financial Position 0.06 4 0.24 3 0.18 2 0.12 Total 1.00 3.35 2.52 2.04 Opportunities 1. Younger consumers are less price sensitive and generally spend more on casual and athletic footwear than older consumers 2. Most footwear companies have outsourced their production abroad in order to maintain lower cost and R&D expenses 3. US footwear imports totaled 2.36 billion pairs in 2007, or roughly 7.9 pairs per capita which is was up 0.4 percent from 2006 4. North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the World Trade Organization (WTO), both helped eliminate quotas and tariff barriers for foreign footwear manufacturers to ship their goods Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
  • 3. 5. The Internet allows footwear companies to pursue a direct to consumer sales channel 6. Sales of apparel, accessories, and footwear on the Internet has been growing at a double digit pace, considerably faster than more traditional sales models such as retail stores 7. Internet sales of apparel, accessories, and footwear could reach 18 percent of category sales by 2012 8. Companies that added a Web-based sales strategy are able to customize footwear and other merchandise directly to the customer’s needs and taste, are enable to achieve considerably better pricing as well as “deepening” the emotional bond consumers have with the brand Threats 1. After the age of 40, the typical consumer is not willing to pay more than $35 to $40 per pair for athletic footwear 2. Competition is strong among athletic footwear and apparel from off brand companies 3. Fluctuation of foreign currency impacts the cost of importing goods to the U.S. 4. Increase in unemployment has impacted the household income which may result in spending less on brand name 5. Barrier to entry is low 6. Level of inventory is increasing in many retail stores due weak economy External Factor Evaluation (EFE) Matrix Key External Factors Weight Rating Weighted Score Opportunities 1. Younger consumers are less price sensitive and generally spend more on casual and athletic footwear than older consumers 0.08 3 0.24 2. Most footwear companies have outsourced their production abroad in order to maintain lower cost and R&D expenses 0.07 4 0.28 3. US footwear imports totaled 2.36 billion pairs in 2007, or roughly 7.9 pairs per capita which is was up 0.4 percent from 2006 0.07 3 0.21 4. North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the World Trade Organization (WTO), both helped eliminate quotas and tariff barriers for foreign footwear manufacturers to ship their goods 0.06 4 0.24 5. The Internet allows footwear companies to pursue a direct to consumer sales channel 0.07 4 0.28 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
  • 4. 6. Sales of apparel, accessories, and footwear on the Internet has been growing at a double digit pace, considerably faster than more traditional sales models such as retail stores 0.08 3 0.24 7. Internet sales of apparel, accessories, and footwear could reach 18 percent of category sales by 2012 0.07 4 0.28 8. Companies that added a Web-based sales strategy are able to customize footwear and other merchandise directly to the customer's needs and taste, are enable to achieve considerably better pricing as well as "deepening" the emotional bond consumers have with the brand 0.06 3 0.18 Threats 1. After the age of 40, the typical consumer is not willing to pay more than $35 to $40 per pair for athletic footwear 0.07 3 0.21 2. Competition is strong among athletic footwear and apparel from off brand companies 0.08 2 0.16 3. Fluctuation of foreign currency impacts the cost of importing goods to the U.S. 0.06 2 0.12 4. Increase in unemployment has impacted the household income which may result in spending less on brand name 0.09 3 0.27 5. Barrier to entry is low 0.06 2 0.12 6. Level of inventory is increasing in many retail stores due weak economy 0.08 2 0.16 Total 1.00 2.99 Positioning Map Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
  • 5. E. Internal Audit Strengths 1. Nike is the dominant competitor for athletic footwear priced above $60 per pair, holding better than a 50 percent market share for athletic footwear priced $85 per pair or higher 2. Nike characterizes its organization as a collaborative matrix organization 3. The Jordan brand has a 10.8 percent share of the overall U.S. shoe market, which makes it the second biggest brand in the country and more than twice the size of Adidas’ share 4. Three out of every four pairs of basketball shoes sold in this country are Jordan, while 86.5 percent of all basketball shoes sold over $100 are Jordan 5. Nike’s 2009 revenues increased 2.9 percent to $19.1 billion 6. Inside the United States, Nike has three significant distribution and customer service facilities 7. Nike estimates that they sell products to more than 25,000 retail accounts in the United States and more than 27,000 retail accounts, including Nike- owned stores and a mix of independent distributors and licensees outside the United States 8. The company’s Internet Web site, www.nikebiz.com, allows customers to design and purchase Nike products directly from the company Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Price (High)Price (low) Customer Loyalty (High) Customer Loyalty (Low) Nike Puma Adidas
  • 6. 9. Nike has five wholly owned subsidiaries: Cole Haan, Converse, Hurley International, NIKE Golf, and Umbro Ltd Weaknesses 1. Nike’s 2009 net income decreased 21 percent to $1.48 billion 2. Almost all of Nike’s footwear is manufactured outside the United States by independent contractors 3. In fiscal 2008, contract manufacturers in China, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand manufactured 99 percent of Nike’s footwear worldwide 4. Because Nike competes primarily in athletic footwear, apparel and related sporting equipment, its sales are heavily concentrated in the youth and young adult market 5. Accounts payable has increased by almost $1.0 billion in 2009 6. Negative publicity and boycotting of the Nike products due to outsourcing jobs overseas and the use of child labor in such factories Financial Ratio Analysis (December 2009) Growth Rates % Nike Industry S&P 500 Sales (Qtr vs year ago qtr) -4.00 -2.10 -4.80 Net Income (YTD vs YTD) -1.50 -2.00 -6.00 Net Income (Qtr vs year ago qtr) -4.00 -1.60 26.80 Sales (5-Year Annual Avg.) 9.37 14.53 12.99 Net Income (5-Year Annual Avg.) 9.47 11.78 12.69 Dividends (5-Year Annual Avg.) 21.51 14.72 11.83 Price Ratios Nike Industry S&P 500 Current P/E Ratio 22.0 25.7 26.7 P/E Ratio 5-Year High 23.5 0.9 16.6 P/E Ratio 5-Year Low 10.7 0.2 2.6 Price/Sales Ratio 1.75 2.10 2.25 Price/Book Value 3.49 3.96 3.48 Price/Cash Flow Ratio 17.50 17.70 13.70 Profit Margins % Nike Industry S&P 500 Gross Margin 44.5 49.2 38.9 Pre-Tax Margin 10.3 14.4 10.3 Net Profit Margin 8.0 10.1 7.1 5Yr Gross Margin (5-Year Avg.) 44.5 51.7 38.6 5Yr PreTax Margin (5-Year Avg.) 12.9 18.2 16.6 5Yr Net Profit Margin (5-Year Avg.) 9.0 12.1 11.5 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
  • 7. Financial Condition Nike Industry S&P 500 Debt/Equity Ratio 0.06 0.06 1.09 Current Ratio 3.5 3.5 1.5 Quick Ratio 2.7 2.6 1.3 Interest Coverage 223.8 139.0 23.7 Leverage Ratio 1.4 1.4 3.4 Book Value/Share 18.94 15.21 21.63 Adapted from www.moneycentral.msn.com Avg P/E Price/ Sales Price/ Book Net Profit Margin (%) 05/09 17.80 1.46 3.19 7.8 05/08 16.40 1.85 4.29 10.1 05/07 16.10 1.77 4.05 9.1 05/06 16.00 1.42 3.27 9.3 05/05 18.00 1.62 3.80 8.8 05/04 18.40 1.57 3.91 7.7 05/03 17.20 1.40 3.70 6.9 05/02 21.30 1.48 3.73 6.8 05/01 20.10 1.18 3.16 6.2 05/00 23.00 1.33 3.69 6.4 Book Value/ Share Debt/ Equity Return on Equity (%) Return on Assets (%) Interest Coverage 05/09 $17.91 0.09 17.1 11.2 NA 05/08 $15.93 0.08 24.1 15.1 NA 05/07 $14.00 0.08 21.2 14.0 NA 05/06 $12.28 0.11 22.1 14.1 NA 05/05 $10.81 0.14 21.5 13.8 NA 05/04 $9.09 0.17 19.8 12.0 36.6 05/03 $7.57 0.21 18.5 10.9 26.8 05/02 $7.21 0.29 17.4 10.4 22.1 05/01 $6.51 0.37 16.9 10.1 15.7 05/00 $5.82 0.46 18.5 9.9 20.4 Adapted from www.moneycentral.msn.com Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) Matrix Key Internal Factors Weight Rating Weighted Score Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
  • 8. Strengths 1. Nike is the dominant competitor for athletic footwear priced above $60 per pair, holding better than a 50 percent market share for athletic footwear priced $85 per pair or higher 0.08 4 0.32 2. Nike characterizes its organization as a collaborative matrix organization 0.02 3 0.06 3. The Jordan brand has a 10.8 percent share of the overall U.S. shoe market, which makes it the second biggest brand in the country and more than twice the size of Adidas' share 0.06 4 0.24 4. Three out of every four pairs of basketball shoes sold in this country are Jordan, while 86.5 percent of all basketball shoes sold over $100 are Jordan 0.08 4 0.32 5. Nike's 2009 revenues increased 2.9 percent to $19.1 billion 0.09 4 0.36 6. Inside the United States, Nike has three significant distribution and customer service facilities 0.05 3 0.15 7. Nike estimates that they sell products to more than 25,000 retail accounts in the United States and more than 27,000 retail accounts, including Nike-owned stores and a mix of independent distributors and licensees outside the United States 0.04 3 0.12 8. The company's Internet Web site, www.nikebiz.com, allows customers to design and purchase Nike products directly from the company 0.07 4 0.28 9. Nike has five wholly owned subsidiaries: Cole Haan, Converse, Hurley International, NIKE Golf, and Umbro Ltd 0.07 3 0.21 Weaknesses 1. Nike's 2009 net income decreased 21 percent to $1.48 billion 0.07 2 0.14 2. Almost all of Nike's footwear is manufactured outside the United States by independent contractors 0.08 1 0.08 3. In fiscal 2008, contract manufacturers in China, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand manufactured 99 percent of Nike's footwear worldwide 0.06 1 0.06 4. Because Nike competes primarily in athletic footwear, apparel and related sporting equipment, its sales are heavily concentrated in the youth and young adult market. 0.08 1 0.08 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
  • 9. 5. Accounts payable has increased by almost $1.0 billion in 2009 0.08 2 0.16 6. Negative publicity and boycotting of the Nike products due to outsourcing jobs overseas and the use of child labor in such factories 0.07 1 0.07 Total 1.00 2.65 F. SWOT Strategies Strengths Weaknesses 1. Nike is the dominant competitor for athletic footwear priced above $60 per pair, holding better than a 50 percent market share for athletic footwear priced $85 per pair or higher 2. Nike characterizes its organization as a collaborative matrix organization 3. The Jordan brand has a 10.8 percent share of the overall U.S. shoe market, which makes it the second biggest brand in the country and more than twice the size of Adidas’ share 4. Three out of every four pairs of basketball shoes sold in this country are Jordan, while 86.5 percent of all basketball shoes sold over $100 are Jordan 5. Nike’s 2009 revenues increased 2.9 percent to $19.1 billion 6. Inside the United States, Nike has three significant distribution and customer service 1. Nike’s 2009 net income decreased 21 percent to $1.48 billion 2. Almost all of Nike’s footwear is manufactured outside the United States by independent contractors 3. In fiscal 2008, contract manufacturers in China, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand manufactured 99 percent of Nike’s footwear worldwide 4. Because Nike competes primarily in athletic footwear, apparel and related sporting equipment, its sales are heavily concentrated in the youth and young adult market 5. Accounts payable has increased by almost $1.0 billion in 2009 6. Negative publicity and boycotting of the Nike products due to outsourcing jobs overseas and the use of child labor in such factories Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
  • 10. facilities 7. Nike estimates that they sell products to more than 25,000 retail accounts in the United States and more than 27,000 retail accounts, including Nike-owned stores and a mix of independent distributors and licensees outside the United States 8. The company’s Internet Web site, www.nikebiz.com, allows customers to design and purchase Nike products directly from the company 9. Nike has five wholly owned subsidiaries: Cole Haan, Converse, Hurley International, NIKE Golf, and Umbro Ltd Opportunities S-O Strategies W-O Strategies 1. Younger consumers are less price sensitive and generally spend more on casual and athletic footwear than older consumers 2. Most footwear companies have outsourced their production abroad in order to maintain lower cost and R&D expenses 3. US footwear imports totaled 2.36 billion pairs in 2007, or roughly 7.9 pairs per capita which is was up 0.4 percent from 2006 1. Expand into international market more where the economy is stronger (S1, S3, S4, S7, O1) 2. Increase advertising and promotion through social networking such as Twitter and Facebook (S8, O1, O5, O7) 1. Develop new products for small kids based on cartoon characters (W4, O1, O3) 2. Sponsor more athletics programs, mostly for young generation (W1, W4, W6, O1, O2, O3) Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
  • 11. 4. North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the World Trade Organization (WTO), both helped eliminate quotas and tariff barriers for foreign footwear manufacturers to ship their goods 5. The Internet allows footwear companies to pursue a direct to consumer sales channel 6. Sales of apparel, accessories, and footwear on the Internet has been growing at a double digit pace, considerably faster than more traditional sales models such as retail stores 7. Internet sales of apparel, accessories, and footwear could reach 18 percent of category sales by 2012 8. Companies that added a Web-based sales strategy are able to customize footwear and other merchandise directly to the customer’s needs and taste, are enable to achieve considerably better pricing as well as “deepening” the emotional bond consumers have with the brand Threats S-T Strategies W-T Strategies 1. After the age of 40, the typical consumer is not willing to pay more than 1. Develop a new moderately priced product line (S1, S2, S3, 1. Make low priced footwear made in the US and promote it as “Made Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
  • 12. $35 to $40 per pair for athletic footwear 2. Competition is strong among athletic footwear and apparel from off brand companies 3. Fluctuation of foreign currency impacts the cost of importing goods to the U.S. 4. Increase in unemployment has impacted the household income which may result in spending less on brand name 5. Barrier to entry is low 6. Level of inventory is increasing in many retail stores due weak economy S4, T2, T4, T6) 2. Expand distribution by selling to stores other than their own retailers (S7, T2) in America” (W2, W6, T2, T3, T4, T6) 2. Acquire a less expensive brand of accessories and sportswear and promote them as an off brand of Nike (W4, W6, T1, T4, T6) Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
  • 13. G. SPACE Matrix Financial Stability (FS) Environmental Stability (ES) Return on Investment 4 Unemployment -4 Leverage 5 Technological Changes -4 Liquidity 3 Price Elasticity of Demand -5 Working Capital 3 Competitive Pressure -5 Cash Flow 4 Barriers to Entry -5 Financial Stability (FS) Average 3.8 Environmental Stability (ES) Average -4.6 Competitive Stability (CS) Industry Stability (IS) Market Share -1 Growth Potential 5 Product Quality -2 Financial Stability 4 Customer Loyalty -3 Ease of Market Entry 1 Competition’s Capacity Utilization -1 Resource Utilization 3 Technological Know-How -4 Profit Potential 4 Competitive Stability (CS) Average -2.2 Industry Stability (IS) Average 3.4 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. FS CS ES IS 654321 Conservative Aggressive CompetitiveDefensive 1 2 3 4 5 6 7-2-3-4-5-7 -1-6 7 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1
  • 14. Y-axis: FS + ES = 3.8 + (-4.6) = - 0.8 X-axis: CS + IS = (-2.2) + (3.4) = 1.2 H. Grand Strategy Matrix 1. Market development 2. Market penetration 3. Product development 4. Forward integration 5. Backward integration 6. Horizontal integration 7. Related diversification Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Weak Competitive Position Quadrant II Quadrant I Quadrant IV Quadrant III Strong Competitive Position Rapid Market Growth Slow Market Growth
  • 15. I. The Internal-External (IE) Matrix The IFE Total Weighted Score Strong 3.0 to 4.0 Average 2.0 to 2.99 Weak 1.0 to 1.99 High 3.0 to 3.99 I II III Medium 2.0 to 2.99 IV IV Nike, Inc. VI Low 1.0 to 1.99 VII VIII IX J. QSPM Increase advertising and promotion through social networking such as Twitter and Facebook Acquire a less expensive brand of accessories and sportswear and promote them as an off brand of Nike Key Factors Weight AS TAS AS TAS Opportunities Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. The EFE Total Weighted Score
  • 16. 1. Younger consumers are less price sensitive and generally spend more on casual and athletic footwear than older consumers 0.08 1 0.08 4 0.32 2. Most footwear companies have outsourced their production abroad in order to maintain lower cost and R&D expenses 0.07 --- --- --- --- 3. US footwear imports totaled 2.36 billion pairs in 2007, or roughly 7.9 pairs per capita which is was up 0.4 percent from 2006 0.07 --- --- --- --- 4. North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the World Trade Organization (WTO), both helped eliminate quotas and tariff barriers for foreign footwear manufacturers to ship their goods 0.06 2 0.12 3 0.18 5. The Internet allows footwear companies to pursue a direct to consumer sales channel 0.07 --- --- --- --- 6. Sales of apparel, accessories, and footwear on the Internet has been growing at a double digit pace, considerably faster than more traditional sales models such as retail stores 0.08 2 0.16 4 0.32 7. Internet sales of apparel, accessories, and footwear could reach 18 percent of category sales by 2012 0.07 4 0.28 1 0.07 8. Companies that added a Web-based sales strategy are able to customize footwear and other merchandise directly to the customer's needs and taste, are enable to achieve considerably better pricing as well as "deepening" the emotional bond consumers have with the brand 0.06 4 0.24 1 0.06 Threats 1. After the age of 40, the typical consumer is not willing to pay more than $35 to $40 per pair for athletic footwear 0.07 1 0.07 4 0.28 2. Competition is strong among athletic footwear and apparel from off brand companies 0.08 --- --- --- --- 3. Fluctuation of foreign currency impacts the cost of importing goods to the U.S. 0.06 --- --- --- --- 4. Increase in unemployment has impacted the household income which may result in spending less on brand name 0.09 1 0.09 3 0.27 5. Barrier to entry is low 0.06 --- --- --- --- 6. Level of inventory is increasing in many retail stores due weak economy 0.08 4 0.32 2 0.16 TOTAL 1.00 1.36 1.66 Strengths 1. Nike is the dominant competitor for athletic footwear priced above $60 per pair, holding 0.08 --- --- --- --- Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
  • 17. better than a 50 percent market share for athletic footwear priced $85 per pair or higher 2. Nike characterizes its organization as a collaborative matrix organization 0.02 --- --- --- --- 3. The Jordan brand has a 10.8 percent share of the overall U.S. shoe market, which makes it the second biggest brand in the country and more than twice the size of Adidas' share 0.06 3 0.18 1 0.06 4. Three out of every four pairs of basketball shoes sold in this country are Jordan, while 86.5 percent of all basketball shoes sold over $100 are Jordan 0.08 3 0.24 1 0.08 5. Nike's 2009 revenues increased 2.9 percent to $19.1 billion 0.09 --- --- --- --- 6. Inside the United States, Nike has three significant distribution and customer service facilities 0.05 --- --- --- --- 7. Nike estimates that they sell products to more than 25,000 retail accounts in the United States and more than 27,000 retail accounts, including Nike-owned stores and a mix of independent distributors and licensees outside the United States 0.04 3 0.12 4 0.16 8. The company's Internet Web site, www.nikebiz.com, allows customers to design and purchase Nike products directly from the company 0.07 4 0.28 1 0.07 9. Nike has five wholly owned subsidiaries: Cole Haan, Converse, Hurley International, NIKE Golf, and Umbro Ltd 0.07 1 0.07 3 0.21 Weaknesses 1. Nike's 2009 net income decreased 21 percent to $1.48 billion 0.07 1 0.07 3 0.21 2. Almost all of Nike's footwear is manufactured outside the United States by independent contractors 0.08 --- --- --- --- 3. In fiscal 2008, contract manufacturers in China, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand manufactured 99 percent of Nike's footwear worldwide 0.06 --- --- --- --- 4. Because Nike competes primarily in athletic footwear, apparel and related sporting equipment, its sales are heavily concentrated in the youth and young adult market 0.08 1 0.08 3 0.24 5. Accounts payable has increased by almost $1.0 billion in 2009 0.08 --- --- --- --- 6. Negative publicity and boycotting of the 0.07 --- --- --- --- Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
  • 18. Nike products due to outsourcing jobs overseas and the use of child labor in such factories SUBTOTAL 1.00 1.04 1.03 SUM TOTAL ATTRACTIVENESS SCORE 2.4 2.69 K. Recommendations Acquire a company who manufactures and sells less expensive products than Nike. The company should have established distribution and retail shelf space with non-competing product lines. It would be ideal if the company is a U.S. based corporation with domestic manufacturing facilities. L. EPS/EBIT Analysis $ Amount Needed: $350 million Stock Price: $65.65 Tax Rate: 24% Interest Rate: 4.75% (Estimated) # Shares Outstanding: 487 Million Common Stock Financing Debt Financing Recession Normal Boom Recession Normal Boom EBIT $1,800,000,000 $2,500,000,000 $3,500,000,000 $1,800,000,000 $2,500,000,000 $3,500,000,000 Interest 0 0 0 16,625,000 16,625,000 16,625,000 EBT 1,800,000,000 2,500,000,000 3,500,000,000 1,783,375,000 2,483,375,000 3,483,375,000 Taxes 432,000,000 600,000,000 840,000,000 428,010,000 596,010,000 836,010,000 EAT 1,368,000,000 1,900,000,000 2,660,000,000 1,355,365,000 1,887,365,000 2,647,365,000 # Shares 492,331,302 492,331,302 492,331,302 487,000,000 487,000,000 487,000,000 EPS 2.78 3.86 5.40 2.78 3.88 5.44 70 Percent Stock - 30 Percent Debt 70 Percent Debt - 30 Percent Stock Recession Normal Boom Recession Normal Boom EBIT $1,800,000,000 $2,500,000,000 $3,500,000,000 $1,800,000,000 $2,500,000,000 $3,500,000,000 Interest 13,300,000 13,300,000 13,300,000 3,325,000 3,325,000 3,325,000 EBT 1,786,700,000 2,486,700,000 3,486,700,000 1,796,675,000 2,496,675,000 3,496,675,000 Taxes 428,808,000 596,808,000 836,808,000 431,202,000 599,202,000 839,202,000 EAT 1,357,892,000 1,889,892,000 2,649,892,000 1,365,473,000 1,897,473,000 2,657,473,000 # Shares 490,731,912 490,731,912 490,731,912 488,599,391 488,599,391 488,599,391 EPS 2.77 3.85 5.40 2.79 3.88 5.44 M. Epilogue Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
  • 19. Analysts expect that Nike will be able to boast of its strong earnings, growing gross margins, lean inventories and all-important futures orders. The company has booming international business, especially its China expansion plans, as well as next month’s World Cup, where Nike is sponsoring nine teams. And investors may find out what management has planned for that $7 a share in net cash on the balance sheets. (CNBC.com) Nike unveiled its supercharged Nike Elite Series football boots providing new levels of performance. Nike’s Mercurial Vapor SuperFly II, CTR360 Maestri, Total90 Laser III and Tiempo Legend III all feature new performance upper to improve on-field visibility and a reengineered outsole to deliver lightweight performance for every style of player. Nike designers have reduced the weight of each boot so players can perform at their best. Lightweight construction, intricate engineering, carbon-enforced strength and high contrast colors distinguish the boots. The high contrast colors (Metallic Mach Purple and Total Orange) are engineered together for enhanced visibility. For a footballer this unique combination is designed to increase visual performance enabling them to quickly spot their teammates and execute a game-changing pass. “At Nike, we have a relentless focus on product innovation to give athletes a real competitive edge and deliver the best products in the world,” said Andrew Caine, Nike Design Director for Football Footwear. “The Nike Elite Series delivers lightweight and highly engineered boots for the leading players in the world to perform on the biggest stage this summer.” (finance.yahoo.com) Jordan Brand, a division of NIKE, Inc., announced that the top 10 ranked ESPNU 100 players – No. 1 Harrison Barnes (Ames, IA/North Carolina), No. 2 Jared Sullinger (Columbus, OH/Ohio State), No. 3 Brandon Knight (Coral Springs, FL/Undecided), No. 4 Kyrie Irving (West Orange, NJ/Duke), No. 5 Tobias Harris (Dix Hills, NY/Tennessee), No. 6 Will Barton (Baltimore, MD/Memphis), No. 7 Josh Selby (Baltimore, MD/Undecided), No. 8 C.J. Leslie (Holly Springs, NC/Undecided), No. 9 Perry Jones (Duncanville, TX/Baylor) and No. 10 Tristan Thompson (Brampton, ONT/Texas) – will headline the nation’s best high school senior basketball players at the 2010 Jordan Brand Classic, presented by Foot Locker, at Madison Square Garden in New York City on Saturday, April 17 at 8:00 p.m. EST. This year’s event will once again be televised nationally live on ESPN2. The Jordan Brand Classic will also continue to include a Regional Game, showcasing the top prep players from the New York City metropolitan area in a City vs. Suburbs showdown. In its third year of the event, an International Game will feature 16 of the top 17-and-under players from around the world. Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.