This document provides a summary of a systems engineering update presentation given to the International Council on Systems Engineering Colorado Front Range Chapter. It discusses:
1) The evolution of systems engineering from early space programs like Sputnik and Mercury through modern programs like the International Space Station.
2) An example case study of the Wake Shield Facility and the systems engineering approaches used in its development.
3) Recent government experience with systems engineering from the Director of Defense Research and Engineering and the Under Secretary of the Air Force.
4) Trends driving needs for systems engineering education and applications of systems engineering beyond aerospace to areas like energy and cybersecurity.
1. Systems Engineering Update
November 21, 2013
Presentation to International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE)
Colorado Front Range Chapter
Dr. Ron Sega
Director, Graduate Programs in Systems Engineering
Colorado State University
2. Overview
Background – Evolution of Systems Engineering
Example: Wake Shield Facility
Recent Government Experience: DDR&E and USecAF
Trends/Needs for Systems Engineering
Certificate of Completion, Master of Engineering (M.E.),
Master of Science (M.S.) and Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)
in Systems Engineering programs at CSU
Applications Beyond Aerospace (e.g. Energy, Cyber, etc.)
Discussion
2
11. Wake Shield Facility
- “Systems Engineering” Case Study
Objectives:
1. Create and Characterize an Ultra-Vacuum
2. Grow a Thin Film
12. Wake Shield Facility
An Integrated System
Source: J. A. Strozier, M. Sterling, J. A. Schultz, A. Ignatiev, Wake
vacuum measurement and analysis for the wake shield facility free
flying platform, VacuumVolume 64, Issue 2, , 27 November 2001,
Pages 119-144. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TW444D2CDR-5/2/b18f908a6d747ac582ca59a9fc99aa5d)
26. Back-to-Basics and the Block Approach
-“Systems Engineering” Case Study
Recognition of Systems Engineering Needs in
Complex Systems
– Director of Defense Research and Engineering (20012005)
– Technology Readiness and Systems Assessments
Implementation of More Disciplined Space Systems
Acquisition Strategy
– Under Secretary of the Air Force (2005-2007) Executive Agent for Space
– Back-to-Basics and the Block Approach
• Applications to Energy and Other Complex Systems
27. Director of Defense Research and Engineering
Department of Defense
Three Areas of Increased Emphasis
– National Aerospace Initiative
– Surveillance and Knowledge Systems
– Energy and Power Technologies
Technical Systems Reviews
– Technology Readiness and Assessments
– Task Force support to Systems Development
Workforce Initiative
– DUSD (Laboratories and Basic Sciences)
– National Defense Education Program (NDEP)
28. National Aerospace Initiative (NAI)
- Reference 2001 Plan
NAI
High Speed
Hypersonics
• Strategic Focus
• Technical Coordination
• Aerospace Workforce
Space Access
Space
Technology
DoD/NASA
TCT/NPR
Space
Commission
Reusable Launch Vehicle
Expendable
(Missiles)
Reusable
[Mach 0 - 12]
Responsive
Payloads
2nd Stage Rocket Engine
Mach<4
4<Mach<15
Long-Range
Strike
[Mach 0-7]
Air-Breathing
1st Stage (TSTO)
[Mach 0 - 12]
Space
Maneuvering
Vehicle
Flexible
Comm
ISR
Space Control
Synergy Goal: 1 + 1 + 1 > 3
29. NASA X-43A
- Successful Flight Test – March 27, 2004
Team Effort
• 808 Engine Ground Tests
• Numerous Unpowered
aerodynamic tests
• 40 Powered vehicle wind tunnel
tests
• Engine Gnd Tests (Mach 4.5–15)
Results Achieved
• Mach 7
• 10 Seconds Powered (Scramjet)
Second Flight Test – Mach 10
29
NASA
30. Hypersonics -- X-51A
- Latest Flight: May 1, 2013 -- Sustained Mach 5.1
Test Flight – May 26, 2010
30
31. Energy & Power Technologies…
- Enabling a More Electric Force
POWER
GENERATION
Fuel Cells & Fuel
Reforming
Novel Power
•
•
•
•
ENERGY
STORAGE
Batteries
Capacitors
FUEL CELL
Electric Warship
s
ed
e
rN
e
ow
P
•
•
Switching &
Conditioning
Power
Transmission &
Distribution
Thermal
Management
Space Based Radar
High Power Microwave
POWER CONTROL
AND DISTRIBUTION
•
More Electric Aircraft
FY02
FY12
New Operational
Capabilities
Electric/Hybrid
Weapons
Warrior
Hybrid/Electric
Combat Vehicle
31
32. Under Secretary of the Air Force
Space
– Department of Defense Executive Agent for Space
– Back to Basics in Acquisition and the Block Approach
• Systems Engineering
• Workforce
Research and Development
– Alignment with Needs and Redistribution of Risk
– Stability in Basic Research
Energy
– “Make Energy a Consideration in All We Do”
– Energy Strategy (Supply and Demand – with Metrics)
33. Back to Basics in Acquisition
Examples:
Four-stage process
System Production
Systems Development
Technology Development
Science & Technology
STP-R1
Streak
XSS11
Reapportion Risk
Lower risk in Production
Higher risk in S&T
GPS-IIR-M
TSAT
34. Acquisition Stages—Block Approach
- GPS III Example
IIIA
System
Production
Systems
Development
Technology
Development
IIIC
Block 2
Block 1
Block 3
Block 4
Cross
Links
Block 2
Spot
Beam
Block 3
Science & Clocks
Technology
Block 4
IIIB
Block 3
Block 4
Block 5
Block 4
Block 5
Block 6
Block 5
Block 6
Block 7
36. Tactical Satellite Experiment-2 (TacSat-2)
Successful Launch,
16 Dec 06
Ground Terminal –
China Lake
Capability:
• Field tasking/data downlink in same pass
• One meter tactical imagery
• Specific emitter ID & geolocation
• Dynamic retasking
• Autonomous tasking/checkout/on-orbit
maintenance, on-board data processing
• Total mission cost w/ launch ~$63M
Notes:
First Image, Pacific Ocean
• First of TACSAT series on-orbit
• Utilized the Minotaur launch vehicle
• Launched from Wallops Island Facility
• Successfully commanded spacecraft
from China Lake ground station
37. Air Force Energy Strategy
- Addressing Supply & Demand
“Make Energy a Consideration in All We Do”
Accelerate development and use of “Alternative” sources
Synthetic Fuel for Aviation
Renewable Energy for Installations
Enhance energy efficiency -- aviation and infrastructure
Promote a culture where Airmen conserve energy
37
38. Examples of Air Force Energy Initiatives in the
United States
Demonstrate H2 Production &
Military Fuel Cell Vehicle
Grand Forks AFB, ND
Synthetic Fuels
Research, Air
Force Research
Lab, WPAFB, OH
Fuel Cell/Electric
Warehouse Tractor
Selfridge ANGB, MI
14MW Photovoltaic
generation, Nellis AFB, NV
B-52 SynFuel Flight
Demo, Edwards AFB, CA
Wind generation farm,
FE Warren AFB, WY
Low Speed
Vehicles
Shaw AFB, SC
122 KW Photovoltaic
project, Luke AFB, AZ
Waste energy
and ice plant,
Dyess AFB, TX
Demonstration Sites
Advanced Power
Technology Office,
Robins AFB, GA
Air Force Energy Office,
Tyndall AFB, FL
Center of Excellence
38
39. Organizational Awards Received by the Air Force
(2005-2007)
Green Power Partner of the Year Award
- Department of Energy (DOE) /
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Climate Protection Award
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Stratospheric Ozone Protection Award
- United Nations Environmental Programme and
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Presidential Award for Leadership in Federal Energy
Management
- To U.S. Air Force Energy Strategy Senior Focus Group
39
40. Systems Engineering
Trend toward increasing complexity of systems
– Aerospace, Energy, Environment, Health Care, etc.
Needs of industry and government
– National Surveys
– Recent Colorado Industry and Government Survey
Systems Engineering education at CSU
– Undergraduate emphasis on systems approach
– Master of Engineering in Systems Engineering began
Fall 2008
– M.S. and Ph.D. programs in Systems Engineering
initially emphasize Energy Systems
50. Concept for an Integrated National
Secure Smart Grid “Test Bed”
•
•
Best Practices
•
Security Models
•
Business Models
•
Benefits
•
Scaling Strategies
•
Policy/Regulatory
Requirements
•
NREL DER Lab
Standards
R&D Opportunities
InteGrid Lab
Own-Operate
Host Partners
Universities and
National Labs
Design-Build
Smart Grid Analytics and Training Center
Tech Partners
50
51. Engines and Energy Conversion Lab
Distribution / Controls Technologies
Integrid Lab (CSU and Spirae)
51
52. The Institute’s Blueprint Rollout Event
- September 30, 2008 in Fort Collins, Colorado
General James L. Jones, USMC (Ret.),
President and CEO, Institute for 21st
Century Energy, U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Wayne Allard, U.S. Senator (R-CO)
Renny Fagan, State Director, Office of U.S.
Senator Ken Salazar (D-CO)
Robert McGrath, Deputy Laboratory
Director for Science and Technology,
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Thomas Gendron, Chairman, CEO and
President, Woodward
Ron Bills, CEO and Chairman, Envirofit
International
Doug Henston, CEO, Solix Biofuels, Inc.
Ron Sega, Woodward Professor of Systems
Engineering (CSU), and Vice President of
Energy, Environment and Applied Research
(CSURF)
Above: Gen. James Jones and Dr. Ron Sega
52
53. Master of Engineering in Systems
Engineering
Customer-driven program
Great survey response
Working professional focus
Aerospace & Energy Sectors
Needs/Relevance Emphasis
for Systems Engr Education
Flexible delivery modes
(in-class, out-of-class,
synchronous and/or
asynchronous)
National experts present
case studies
53
54. On-going Master of Engineering
in Systems Engineering
Core courses:
Foundations of Systems Engineering
Information Technology and Project Management
Overview of Systems Engineering Processes
Engineering Risk Analysis
Select 3 of 7:
Engineering Optimization: Method/Application
Engineering Decision Support/Expert Systems
Simulation Modeling and Experimentation
Software Development Methodology
Dynamics of Complex Engineering Systems
Electrical Power Engineering
Systems Engineering Architecture
Electives:
With advisor approval, any 400 Level or above regular course credits course
consistent with the student’s program of study.
Capstone Course:
Group Study in Systems Engineering
54
55. M.S. and Ph.D. in Systems Engineering
- Initial Emphasis in Energy Systems
Began Fall 2010 – approved for distance delivery 2012
Complimentary to the School of Global Environmental
Sustainability
Optimizing alignment with:
Faculty interests
Global trends/needs
Clean Energy Supercluster strengths in “Energy
Systems”
Collaboratory “Energy Systems” strengths
Government Interests
Industry partner interests
55
56. M.E., M.S. and Ph.D. in Systems Engineering
M.E.
M.S.
Ph.D.
Core Courses (12h)
Choose 5 of 11 (15h)
Choose 7 of 14 (21h)
ENGR/ECE 501
ENGR/ECE 501
ENGR/ECE 501
ENGR/ECE 530
ENGR 510
ENGR 510
ENGR/ECE 531
ENGR 520
ENGR 520
CIS 600
ENGR/ECE 530
ENGR/ECE 530
Choose 3 of 7 (9h)
ENGR/ECE 531
ENGR 510
ENGR/ECE 532
ENGR 520
CIS 610
ENGR/ECE 532
MECH 513
CIS 610
ENGR/ECE 565
MECH 513
ENGR/ECE 566
ENGR/ECE 565
ENGR/ECE 567
Electives (6h)
400-Level or Above
400-Level or Above
Capstone Course (3h)
ENGR 597
ENGR/ECE 531
ENGR/ECE 532
CIS 610
MECH 513
ENGR/ECE 565 – Electrical Power
Engineering
ENGR/ECE 566 – Energy Conversion for
Electrical Power Systems
ENGR/ECE 567
Electives:
Plan A (6h)
-orPlan B (12h)
Thesis (Plan A - 9h)
-orProject (Plan B - 3h)
ENGR/ECE 567 – Systems Engineering
Architecture
ENGR/ECE 568 – Electrical Energy
Generation Systems
ENGR/ECE 621 – Energy Storage for
Electric power Systems
ENGR/ECE 622 – Energy Networks and
Power Distribution Grids
Additional Courses (18h)
Dissertation (33h)
56
57. Systems Engineering
- Enrollment Growth Estimates
*Numbers reflect Admitted & Registered Students (non-admits are not reflected in these numbers)
19.7% increase in enrollment from
Census Fall 2012 (FY 2013) to Spring
2013 Census (66 to 79 enrolled)
Figure 2: Option B Growth Rate – Based on 66 enrolled students
(see Table 2 for %)
58. Systems Engineering
- Enrollment & Enquiry Status November 5, 2013
72 Certificates Granted
Master Degrees
Admitted 57 M.E. (7 on campus, 50 distance)
Conferred 17 M.E., 2 M.S.
Admitted 27 M.S. (6 on campus, 27 distance)
Ph.D. Degree
Admitted 34 Ph.D. (4 on campus, 30 distance)
25“In process” for Spring 2014 (0 have confirmed advisors)
ENGR/ECE 501 Foundations of Systems Engineering
119 enrolled (Fall Semester 2013)
52 On-campus
67 Distance
59. Systems Engineering
- South Metro Denver Initiative
The Systems Engineering program in Denver’s South
Metro Region is part of a new initiative by Colorado
State University and the CSU System to meet the needs
of working professionals and the business community
Flexible, hybrid model of delivery
Onsite instruction and at a distance - synchronously and
asynchronously
The 4 core courses will be offered at a South Metro
Denver site over the Spring and Fall semesters
60. Systems Engineering
- Alternating Course Offerings
Course
Title
CSU-Fort
Collins
South Metro
Denver Site
ENGR 501
Foundations of Systems
Engineering
Fall
Spring
ENGR 530
Overview of Systems
Engineering Processes
Spring
Fall
ENGR 531
Engineering Risk Analysis
Spring
Fall
CIS 600 or
MECH 501
Engineering Project and
Program Management
Fall
Spring
61. Systems Engineering in South Metro Denver
- Initial Course Offerings (Spring 2014)
ENGR 501 “Foundations of Systems Engineering”
Thursday 5:15 - 8 p.m.
CH2M Hill (9191 South Jamaica Street Englewood, CO
80112-5946)
January 23, 2014 - May 15, 2014
MECH 501 “Engineering Project & Program Management”
Wednesday 5:15 - 8 p.m.
CH2M Hill (9191 South Jamaica Street Englewood, CO
80112-5946)
January 22, 2014 - May 14, 2014
62. Systems Engineering
- Going Forward
Contact Information:
Director: Dr. Ron Sega
Associate Director: Dr. Peter Young
Initial Contact/Advisor: Tara Hancock
sys_engr_info@engr.colostate.edu
970.491.7067
http
://www.online.colostate.edu/degrees/systems-engineering
/
Comments / Questions?
63. Concluding Thoughts
“We owe our current prosperity, security, and good health
to the investments of past generations, and we are obliged
to renew those commitments in education, research, and
innovation policies to ensure that the American people
continue to benefit from the remarkable opportunities
provided by the rapid development of the global economy
and it’s not inconsiderable underpinning in science and
technology.”
Reference: Rising Above The Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing
America for a Brighter Economic Future, National Academy of Sciences, 2005
63
64. Core Program Courses
- 12 Credits
ENGR/ECE 501: Foundations of Systems Engineering
Functional components of systems engineering, application of
systems engineering to practical problems, system life-cycle
process.
ENGR/ECE 531: Engineering Risk Analysis
Estimation and risk identification, development of mitigation
techniques.
ENGR/ECE 530: Overview of Systems Engineering Processes
Systems engineering life-cycle process and analysis techniques.
Reliability and robustness.
CIS 600: Information Technology and Project Management
Strategic role in and management of information technology and
software development projects.
65. Courses In Depth
- Select 9 Credits
ENGR/MATH 510: Engineering Optimization, Method/Application
Optimization methods; linear programming, network flows,
integer programming, interior point methods, quadratic
programming, engineering applications.
ENGR 520: Engineering Decision Support/Expert Systems
Decision support systems for complex engineering problems;
multicriteria decision making and optimization; hybrid
knowledge-based/algorithmic methods.
MECH 513: Simulation Modeling and Experimentation
Logic/analytic modeling in simulations. Event and transient entitybased simulation languages. Simulation design, experimentation
and analysis.
66. Courses In Depth (Cont’d)
- Select 9 Credits
CIS 610: Software Development Methodology
Integrated extended enterprise planning and execution systems
concepts including ERP, CRM, SCM, MRP II, business processes,
front/back office systems.
ENGR/ECE 532: Dynamics of Complex Engineering Systems
Higher-level behavior and issues that emerge from interaction
between components in complex socio-technical systems.
ENGR/ECE 565: Electrical Power Engineering
Analysis of power systems in terms of current, voltage, and
active/reactive power. Introduction of computer-aided tools for
power systems.
ENGR/ECE 567: Systems Engineering Architecture
Observation/classification of systems architecture. Systems
architecture principles and critical evaluation through design
studies.
67. Electives and Group Study
Electives:
Select 6 credits of 400 level or above regular course credits
consistent with the student’s program of study.
ENGR 597: Group Study in Systems Engineering
Capstone study experience in systems engineering.
68. Systems Engineering
- Enrollment Trends
Offered in Spring
Offered in Fall
Offered in Fall & Spring
*CIS 600 ½ of total
CIS 610 ½ of total
70. Systems Engineering: Smart Grid Systems
Systems Engineering:
Complexity
Security
Reliability
Efficiency
Design
Management
71. Systems Engineering
- Fields of Interest for PhD Students
Energy
5%
“Other” Includes:
- Medical/Healthcare
- UAS/Flight Operations
- Civil Engineering
72. M.E., M.S. and Ph.D. in Systems Engineering
- Need for the Program
2007 Industry survey – almost 700 responses (vast majority
positive) within a month
Woodward pledged $1 million to support a systems
engineering endowed professorship at CSU
Flexible delivery system attractive to traditional students
and working professionals
CNNMoney ranks Systems Engineer as the #1 Best Job in
America, in part because “Demand is soaring for systems
engineers”
Projected total enrollment of 48 students within 5 years
72
Notes de l'éditeur
Thank you, Dan, for that kind introduction
I’m delighted to be here today
As the Under Secretary of the Air Force, I wear a couple of hats
The last couple of days I’ve been down in Colorado Springs for the 23rd National Space Symposium as the Executive Agent for DoD Space
The other hat I wear is the Air Force’s Senior Executive for Energy
Finding alternative fuel sources and conserving energy is a good news story for the Air Force
And I’m proud of what the AF is doing as we implement our energy strategy
Today, I’ll give you a quick overview of our AF Energy Strategy and then give you a sense of where we’re going with respect to biofuels
Let me show you why energy savings is so important to the AF
The design of the crew patch for NASA's STS-60 mission depicts the Space Shuttle Discovery's on-orbit configuration. The American and Russian flags symbolize the partnership of the two countries and their crew members taking flight into space together for the first time. The open payload bay contains: the Space Habitation Module (Spacehab), a commercial space laboratory for life and material science experiments; and a Getaway Special Bridge Assembly in the aft section carrying various experiments, both deployable and attached. A scientific experiment to create and measure an ultra-vacuum environment and perform semiconductor material science - the Wake Shield Facility - is shown on the Remote Manipulator System (RMS) prior to deployment. Notes and Image: http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4225/imagery/patches/sts/p-sts60.htm
Five NASA astronauts and a Russian Cosmonaut take a break from training for their scheduled flight in space to pose for the traditional crew portrait. In the front (left to right) are Astronauts Kenneth S. Reightler Jr., and Charles F. Bolden Jr., pilot and commander, respectively. On middle row are Astronauts Franklin R. Chang-Diaz and N. Jan Davis, mission specialists. On back row are Astronaut Ronald M. Sega (left) and Russia's Sergei K. Krikalev, both mission specialists.
Source: http://images.jsc.nasa.gov/index.html
Launch Complex 39 is in partial darkness as the Space Shuttle Discovery heads toward an eight-day mission in Earth orbit. Liftoff occurred as scheduled at 7:10 a.m., February 3, 1994.
Source: http://images.jsc.nasa.gov/index.html
Thank you, Dan, for that kind introduction
I’m delighted to be here today
As the Under Secretary of the Air Force, I wear a couple of hats
The last couple of days I’ve been down in Colorado Springs for the 23rd National Space Symposium as the Executive Agent for DoD Space
The other hat I wear is the Air Force’s Senior Executive for Energy
Finding alternative fuel sources and conserving energy is a good news story for the Air Force
And I’m proud of what the AF is doing as we implement our energy strategy
Today, I’ll give you a quick overview of our AF Energy Strategy and then give you a sense of where we’re going with respect to biofuels
Let me show you why energy savings is so important to the AF
The National Aerospace Initiative (NAI) is a technology framework for transforming our nation’s aerospace capabilities. The NAI incorporates three areas: (1) Hypersonics, (2) Space Access, and (3) Space Technology.
Hypersonics is motivated by time-critical targeting and the Nuclear Posture Review. Space Access is motivated by the joint NASA/AF requirements for responsive and reusable access to space. Space Technology is motivated by the implementation of the Space Commission recommendations.
Synergistic benefits can be realized by integrating and working these three areas together.
4-stage process
Disciplined Approach – starting with requirements
Increased System Engineering – people in the plant
Develop standards
Designs for testability
Redistribute risk: take high risk early in the process and minimize risk as we approach production
Produce space systems that work based in mature, proven technology
Emerging technologies, not mature enough for production, get incorporated in to the next iteration or Block
Workforce – people in the plant
Cost Estimation – 80% in most cases
At the end of the process, we produce Block 1
Bottom left – Evolved Launch Vehicle Secondary Payload Adapter: can mount 6 400-lb satellites
This mission will validate this concept of innovatively saving the taxpayer’s money while at the same time increasing small satellite launch capability to the maximum potential
Top left – night launch last week marked the 50th successful operational launch, which includes the 15th straight successful EELV launch
What can we learn from this success?
First, look at how we’ve come since our last launch mishaps in 1998
The fixes – beefed up FFRDC support (around an additional 100 people)
Emphasis on system engineering and integration
Implemented a disciplined approach
Many of the tenets we are employing to get space acquisitions back on track
The picture on the right is a testament to the integration effort
Send patch from the bottom represents the USAF’s 60th Anniversary
I’d like to leave you with a story from our heritage
One of the first fruits from the Space Development and Test wing was the successful TacSat-2 Experimental launch on 16 Dec from Wallops Island
S&T effort: demonstrated dynamic tasking among other things at a cost of only $63M and launched within an 18 month development launch cycle
S&T efforts like this are important
During my time as DDR&E, funding for S&T doubled during my tenure from 2001 – 2005
Putting satellites on-orbit quickly and at low cost are tenants in our Operationally Responsive Space initiative
Another national security issue is energy consumption
Energy consumption constitutes a supply and demand issue
AF Strategy
Improve supply by finding additional energy sources for Aviation and Installations
Decrease demand by enhancing energy efficiency in both aviation and infrastructure
Create a culture among our Airmen to conserve energy
Supply
For 2005 #1 purchaser of renewable energy n nation; #3 on planet
FY04/05 Green Power Partnership Award
2006 EPA Climate Protection Award
Synthetic fuel – B-52 flight, talk about later
Demand
Replacing inefficient jet engines
Second order effect: fewer refueling sorties
Optimizing aircraft loading and routing
Refining tactics, techniques, and procedures
Culture
Updating AF Policy Document on Energy Management
Sept 2006: Letter to Airmen: Energy Conservation
Sept 2006: VCSAF ltr – Energy Awareness Month
Dyess
100% green power
Developing Waste-to-Energy plant
Lowest CONUS AF facility energy intensity (w/renewable credit)
Nellis
18 MW photovoltaic array (world's largest)
Edwards
Largest AF purchaser of green power
Robins
Advanced Power Technology fuel cell demo site
Lowest facility energy intensity of AF Depots
F E Warren
Wind power generation site
Luke
370 KW photovoltaic membrane roof
Hill
1.3 MW generation from landfill gas
APTO
Mission: Lead, and Manage the identification, assessment, transition, and integration of Advanced Power technologies into the Warfighter’s Support Equipment, Vehicles, and BEAR base equipment
Goal: Provide increased capabilities to the Warfighter; Support the AF’s environmental policy requirements; Reduce dependency on foreign energy sources with the insertion of Advanced Power Technology
Focus Areas:
Field multi-task capable equipment
Reduce airlift and logistic support requirements
Create joint advanced power initiatives
Meet environmental policy requirements
Share/transfer capabilities to Homeland Defense
Provide dual use capability – Commercial/Military
SHAW AFB:
Shaw AFB: $100K Purchased 13 LSVs FY05
AF will purchase $35M worth of LSVs FY07-FY11
FY07 588 units/FY08-FY10 1365 units per year—will reach 30% or higher goal
(LSV # Source: AF/A4RM, Vehicle Support Branch as well as VEMSO)
Grand Forks AFB: Demonstrate H2 Production & Military Fuel Cell Vehicle
Goal: Facilitate USAF/CERL joint effort to develop a JP8 based field portable reformer with integrated dispensing system and a fuel cell forklift at Grand Forks AFB
Milestones
Evaluate JP-8 Supercritical Water Hydrogen Reformer
Design Rapid Hydrogen Dispensing for Commercial/Military Applications
Integrate Fuel Cell into HYSTER forklift
Demonstration at Grand Forks AFB, ND
Selfirdge ANGB: Selfridge ANGB H2 Fuel Cell/Electric Warehouse Tractor
Goal: Facilitate USAF/NAC joint effort to demonstrate and validate the latest fuel efficient and environmentally compliant technologies for use in Air Force support equipment, Basic Expeditionary Airfield Resources (BEAR), and ground vehicle fleets and establish a Cold Region Demonstration Center
Milestones
Introduce fuel cell technology at Selfridge ANGB
Develop and evaluate fuel cell powered vehicles
Determine hydrogen infrastructure requirements
Develop fuel cell maintenance requirements
Establish model for future Air Force/Army procurement
Thank you, Dan, for that kind introduction
I’m delighted to be here today
As the Under Secretary of the Air Force, I wear a couple of hats
The last couple of days I’ve been down in Colorado Springs for the 23rd National Space Symposium as the Executive Agent for DoD Space
The other hat I wear is the Air Force’s Senior Executive for Energy
Finding alternative fuel sources and conserving energy is a good news story for the Air Force
And I’m proud of what the AF is doing as we implement our energy strategy
Today, I’ll give you a quick overview of our AF Energy Strategy and then give you a sense of where we’re going with respect to biofuels
Let me show you why energy savings is so important to the AF
The STS-76 crew patch depicts the Space Shuttle Atlantis and the Russian Space Station Mir as the two space ships prepare for a rendezvous and docking. The "spirit of 76", an era of new beginnings, is represented by the Space Shuttle rising through the circle of 13 stars in the Betsy Ross flag. STS-76 begins a new period of international cooperation in space exploration with the Shuttle transport of a U.S. astronaut, Shannon Lucid, to Mir for extended joint space research.
Notes: http://grcitc.grc.nasa.gov/stuff/patch/patch.cfm
Image: http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/sts-76/mission-sts-76.html
23 MARCH 1996 NM21-727-030 JOHNSON SPACE CENTER, HOUSTON, TEXAS MIR-21 VIEW OF ATLANTIS --- This view of the Space Shuttle Atlantis was taken by the two Mir-21 cosmonaut crew members onboard Russia's Mir Space Station, during rendezvous and docking operations on March 23, 1996. The Orbiter Docking System (ODS), the connective tunnel and the Spacehab module can be seen in Atlantis' cargo bay.
Source: http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/mirrors/images/images/pao/STS-76/
23 MARCH 1996 STS076-713-083 JOHNSON SPACE CENTER, HOUSTON, TEXAS STS-76 VIEW OF MIR --- Backdropped against a massive array of clouds over the south Pacific Ocean and the Tasman Sea, Russias Mir Space Station is seen from the aft flight deck of the Space Shuttle Atlantis. The two spacecraft were in the process of making their third docking in Earth-orbit. With the subsequent delivery of astronaut Shannon W. Lucid to the Mir, the Mir-21 crew grew to three, as the mission specialist quickly becomes a cosmonaut guest researcher. She will spend approximately 140 days on Mir before returning to Earth.
Source: http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/mirrors/images/images/pao/STS-76/
22 - 31 MARCH 1996 STS076-401-009 JOHNSON SPACE CENTER, HOUSTON, TEXAS STS-76 ONBOARD VIEW --- This photo of the crew cabin of the Space Shuttle Atlantis was taken from Russias Mir Space Station as the two spacecraft jointly orbited Earth in late March 1996. Earths horizon and clouds over the Indian Ocean form part of the backdrop for the scene. The large rectangular object in the immediate foreground is one of the solar array panels for Mir.
Source: http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/mirrors/images/images/pao/STS-76/
Adjusted Fall 2012 text box so the graph could be cropped excluding the “legend”
Used Spring 2013 for ME (discrepancy needs to be addressed btwn Spring and Fall 2013 registered), used Fall 2013 census for MS and PhD. 34 Admitted and Registered
Enquires were from Contact tracking spreadsheet
Enquires were from Contact tracking spreadsheet
Enquires were from Contact tracking spreadsheet
Enquires were from Contact tracking spreadsheet
ENGR 567 Spring 2012 Enrollment (29, 27 completed)
05/13/13 For Abt meeting slides 3 and 5 were used.
PPTX were as of April 1
May 10, 2013:
PhD 35 in process with 9 advisors confirmed, 27 enquiries