Open Science by default in Doctoral Schools?

•Télécharger en tant que PPTX, PDF•

4 j'aime•1,094 vues

Open Scholarship (Open Science, Open Educational Resources) delivers directly to individual researcher`s objectives for impact and tenure evaluation, to the research institutions` objectives on innovative education and excellence research, so can Graduate Schools afford not to train all future graduates in "Open" practices alongside research excellence?

Formation

Ivo Grigorov, DTU Aqua Research Secretariat

FUNDERS: National & EC
Academic Staff
Today`s
Graduate
Student
Scientist of
Tomorrow
Project Managers
INSTITUTIONS
Knowledge
Managers

How do YOU measure the success
of YOUR doctotral school?
Number of
PhD`s?
Publication?
Career
Chances ?

@ fosterscience
"Focus on Impact (Factor) distorts
what matters in science”
Dr. Alan Leshner,
CEO AAAS &
Publisher of
”Science” journal
#esof2014 pic.twitter.com/M9D0rVtggI
24/06/2014 16:53

"The currency of researchers is really
about making sure their work can be
read
and can be cited”
Robert Kiley,
Wellcome Trust
”Researchers job is to
change the world, not get tenure”
Dr. Mike Taylor
ESOF2014
Should Science Be OPEN?

“Open science is the umbrella term of the
movement to make scientific research,
data and dissemination accessible to all
levels of an inquiring society,
amateur or professional.”

IDEA &
PROPOSAL
TESTS
DATA
MODEL
CODE
Idealised
Research
Lifecycle
ARTICLES
Peer-review
& DOI
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
Impact Factor
(IF)
Open
Educational
Resources

Problem 1: reproducibility
Source: Peng 2011, Science 334, pp1226
http://www.stodden.net/AMP2011/slides/pengslides.pdf

Problem 2: Access to research
(by universities!)
Importance (x axis) and
ease of access for % universities and colleges (x axis)
Source: “Transitions in Scholarly Communications - a Portfolio of Research Projects,
Research Information Network,” 2011.
http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/communicating-and-disseminating-research/transitions-scholarly-communications-portfolio-

Problem 3: future REF criteria
Quality Research Outputs: articles, books or
other research outputs.
Impact: in the form of case studies which
demonstrate a distinctive
social, economic or cultural impact outside
academia.
Research Environment: the quality
of the environment within which the research conducted.
Source: UK HEFCE, www.hefce.ac.uk/

“Weakness in EXCELLENCE:
Involvement of different sectors is limited,
with no non-academic beneficiaries”
“Weakness in IMPACT:
highly focussed on academic activities, and
lacks an advanced communication strategy”
“Weakness in IMPLEMENTATION:
limitied exposure to
non-academic partners & infrastructures”
Source: Horizon2020,
Marie Curie ETN Evaluation Process, 2014

Open
Notebook
Science
IDEA &
PROPOSAL
TESTS
Data Publication
DATA
DataCenter
MODEL
CODE
Idealised
Research
Lifecycle
ARTICLES
DOI
Publish Code
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
DOI
DOI
REF
IMPACT
Open
Educational
Resources

Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science?
Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, 10.5281/zenodo.12247

Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science?
2.1 Expected impact to WorkProgram
- expected impacts set out in the work programme
- delivering innovations to the markets
- socially important impacts
- plan for results dissemination and exploitation
- research data management for verification & re-use
- knowledge strategy management & Open Access
… for public and societal engagement!
Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, 10.5281/zenodo.12247

25 Nov 2014: Join the Open Science and Research Forum
http://web.csc.fi/csc/kurssit/arkisto/openscienceforum
Jan 2015: Join us in the proposal to the
Nordic eScience Globalization Iniative (NeGI)

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Jisc's new shared data centre

Jisc

SWOT Analysis - What Does it Tell Us?

Philip Bourne

NHS SE presentation

Jisc

The State of Open Data Report by @figshare

eraser Juan José Calderón

The Analytics and Data Science Landscape

Philip Bourne

Research data spring: streamlining deposit

Jisc RDM

Data visualisations: drawing actionable insights from science and technology ...

EFSA EU

20160414 23 Research Data Things

Katina Toufexis

Repositories are digital collections of the scholarly outputs created within a university or research institution. The main purposes of repositories are to provide open access to the institution’s research output. The online repositories are now run by most major research universities. Universities can deposit any research papers that are required to be freely available. The university online repositories will make some substantive version of all its research outputs available online in a free-to-view form. The contents of all repositories are indexed by Web search engines such as Google and Google Scholar. Therefore, Repositories maximizes the visibility and impact of research outputs.

How to Improve Research Visibility and Impact: Session 5, Online Repository

Nader Ale Ebrahim

20160719 23 Research Data Things

Katina Toufexis

20160523 23 Research Data Things

Katina Toufexis

A Successful Academic Medical Center Must be a Truly Digital Enterprise

Philip Bourne

Investing in innovation for genomic medicine - the journey of Repositive

Fiona Nielsen

The importance of Big Data and Open Data to achieve scientific advancements in precision medicine is beyond doubt and evident in many different projects and initiatives such as the Precision Medicine Initiative (All of Us), ICTBioMed, NCIP Hub, 100K Genomics England Project, NIH Cancer Moonshot, and the Million Veterans Program. In April 2013, McKinsey & Company proclaimed that Big Data has the ability to revolutionize pharmaceutical research and development within clinical environments, by using data for better informed decision making and targeting the diverse user roles including physicians, consumers, insurers, and regulators. Companies from a wide spectrum such as Oracle Health Sciences, Google, and Data4Cure build solutions that help address efficient and secure data sharing with the patient or clinician in mind. Open data can be maintained and shared by patient communities such as PatientsLikeMe.com and build an invaluable resource for further data mining. Even with all these advances there are still challenges to address including a recent Precision Medicine World Conference announcement in November 2016: “We are missing easy-to-use solutions to share patient data.” Science gateways are a solution to fill the gap and help form by definition end-to-end solutions – web-based, mobile or desktop applications - that provide intuitive access to advanced resources and allow researchers to focus on tackling today’s challenging science questions. Science Gateways abstract the complex underlying computing and data infrastructure as far as feasible and desired by the stakeholder and can be tailored to different target groups with diverse backgrounds, demands, and technical knowledge. Science Gateways have existed for over a decade and a wide variety of frameworks and APIs have been developed to support the efficient creation of science gateways and ease the implementation of connections to Cloud infrastructures and distributed data on a large scale. The importance of science gateways has been recognized by NSF by funding the creation of a Science Gateways Community Institute (SGCI) to serve the community with free resources, services, experts, and ideas for creating and sustaining science gateways. To achieve this goal, the SGCI serves the community with five areas that have diverse foci and which also closely interact: Incubator, Extended Developer Support, Scientific Software Collaborative, Community Engagement and Exchange and Workforce Development. The Institute is technology-agnostic and serves the community by offering a wide variety of services and using technologies that are the best fitting solution for the use case. Gateways allow for precision medicine to be more efficiently developed or adapted by lowering the barriers to data sharing and Big Data analysis.

SGCI Science Gateways: Harnessing Big Data and Open Data 03-19-2017

Sandra Gesing

Researchers are working in new ways, from crowd sourcing, to open science, to large-scale data-driven research and analytics. All of this is made possible by new technology, for example advances in computational power, big data, the web, democratisation of science and research; this technology and new ways of working have the potential to accelerate research processes and knowledge creation as well as improving research transparency, impact and collaboration. How ubiquitous is this practice? What are the implications for universities? How can we prepare for the future of research? This session will share examples of these emerging research practices and consider the benefits and what needs to be in place to allow research to thrive and take advantage of technology.

The future of research: are you ready? - Jeremy Frey - Jisc Digital Festival ...

Jisc

Shaping future research environments: Digital challenges and opportunities

Jisc

Opening up data: a UK perspective – Jisc and CNI conference 10 July 2014

Jisc

Presentation of science 2.0 at European Astronomical Society

osimod

Something amazing from the University Library - libraries and research workin...

Jisc

Chitty taxonomy boot camp best practices final 2017 oct

Mary Chitty

Tendances (20)