SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  189
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Ex Scientia Tridens
American Sea Power Unprecedented Global Reach
session vii
American Civil War, 1861-1865
Part 4; The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
“BY MIDSUMMER [1862] the whole of the Mississippi apart from a short stretch on the
lower reaches was in Union hands. Communications between the eastern and western
Confederacy were all but severed, and with the capture of Norfolk and New Orleans the
rebels had lost their major shipbuilding centers.…
“The following summer, 1863, Union forces took the last remaining strongholds on the
Mississippi, cutting the agricultural western states of the Confederacy completely from the
eastern states.…”
Peter Padfield, Maritime Dominion and the Triumph of the Free World; Naval Campaigns that Shaped the Modern World, 1852-2001. pp. 41-42.
4
The American Civil War, 1861
“…shipbuilding centers.…
“The following summer, 1863, Union forces took the last remaining strongholds on the
Mississippi, cutting the agricultural western states of the Confederacy completely from the
eastern states.• Simultaneously Lee’s tactical touch deserted him. Advancing against the center
of the Union Army of the Potomac outside Gettysburg, his men suffered terrible losses, and he
was forced to retire into Virginia.•
“The twin defeats east and west [coming within a day of one another] ended any possibility of
military victory for the Confederacy…”
Peter Padfield, Maritime Dominion and the Triumph of the Free World; Naval Campaigns that Shaped the Modern World, 1852-2001. pp. 41-42.
4
The American Civil War, 1861
“…the Confederacy. For the Union the war aims were defined by Lincoln when he came to
dedicate the military cemetery at Gettysburg four months later. Far wider than either
reunification or the abolition of slavery, they were nothing less than the survival of the American
model of democracy.…”
Padfield, p. 42.
4
The American Civil War, 1861
“…of democracy:
“These simple phrases would achieve immortality and provide a beacon for future generations
of Americans.…”
Padfield, p. 42.
4
The American Civil War, 1861
Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty,
and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so
dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion
of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is
altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.
But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate, we can not consecrate, we can not hallow this ground. The brave
men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract.
The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It
is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus
far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that
from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure
of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under
God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people,
shall not perish from the earth.•
Major Topics
I. From New Orleans to Vicksburg
II. Failure of the First Attack
III. Winter Campaign
IV. Vicksburg, Port Hudson, and the Red River Campaign
Vicksburg
From New Orleans to
Vicksburg
The Battle of Memphis, 6 Jun 62.”It
resulted in a crushing defeat for the
Confederate forces, and marked the
virtual eradication of a Confederate
naval presence on the river.”—Wikipedia
“The Battle of the Rams.” by A.R. Ward, 1862.
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Potter & Nimitz, eds., Sea Power, p. 293.
“The Confederate plan to hold a second line of defense between Memphis and
Chattanooga • along the Memphis and Charleston railroad—the only direct rail connection
between the Mississippi River and the Atlantic coast—was born of necessity out of the Fort
Donelson disaster. Neither the Battle of Shiloh nor the Union occupation of New Orleans had
altered the basic strategic pattern. The Federal campaign against the rail junction of Corinth •
was renewed under the direct command of Gen Halleck • who, dismayed by the fearful
bloodletting at Shiloh, felt bound to use his armies with caution. Only after assembling 100,000
men did he resume the advance. Confederate Gen Beauregard • had no more than 50,000
troops with which to delay the Union forces. He had to save his army while the Confederacy
rallied its full strength—even at the cost of abandoning Corinth. Brilliantly impeding Halleck
by every means short of a major battle, Beauregard capitalized on Halleck’s caution to prolong
the 20-mile advance for a whole month. When the Federal soldiers finally entered Corinth on
29 Mar 62, they found the fortifications empty. Beauregard’s entire army had slipped S to
Tupelo, 60 miles away. In the meantime, Union naval activity on the Mississippi largely
depended upon the progress of Halleck’s campaign.… ”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Ibid.
“…Halleck’s campaign.
“After the capture of Island No. 10 in early Apr 62, the Union gunboats steamed
downriver to lead the attack against the next Confederate strong point. That was Fort
Pillow, on the east-bank bluffs of the Mississippi, the sole river fortification between the
Union forces and Memphis….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Ibid.
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Ibid.
“…and Memphis. Gen Pope’s 20,000 men landed above the fort but had made little
progress before they were ordered to join Halleck in the Corinth campaign. In the absence
of strong army support, the Union ironclads took turns guarding mortar boats which were
brought down to bombard the Confederate position, for only the high arching trajectory of
mortar fire could reach the fort from the river. Such activity had become routine by 9 May
when Flag Officer Foote,• incapacitated by the wound he had received at Fort Donelson,
turned over his command to Capt Charles H. Davis.• The very next morning a surprise
attack by the rams of the Confederate River Defense Fleet produced a spirited engagement
at Plum Point Bend above Fort Pillow….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Ibid.
“…Fort Pillow. After the Union ironclads Cincinnati and Mound City were sunk, the attackers
withdrew with several of their ships damaged but able to drift downstream to the protection of
the fort….”
op. cit., pp. 293-294.
“…the fort.
“The action was humiliating to the North, even
though both sunken gunboats were soon raised
and repaired. The enemy had dashed in for a
telling blow, taking advantage of Northern laxity,
and had escaped from superior forces on which
they had inflicted greater damage than they
themselves had received. However this
Confederate success did not save Fort Pillow. The
Federal bombardment was resumed and
continued for another three weeks until the
Union victory at Corinth gave the Confederates
in their outflanked position a dubious choice:
either abandon the fort or remain to be captured
in it. Explosions heard on the night of 4 Jun
notified the gunboats that the fort was being
evacuated. Burning their stores and destroying
their precious artillery, the Confederate defenders
withdrew.
“Capt Davis, his force augmented by four
maneuverable rams commanded by • Col Charles
Ellet of the Union Army Engineers, now had an
opportunity to avenge the humiliation of Plum
Point Bend….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., pp. 293-294.
“…Point Bend. His fleet steamed down to
Memphis,• arriving early on 6 Jun. The
townspeople lined the heights along the river to see
the show, confident in the eight rams of the
Confederate River Defense Fleet, which formed in a
double line before the city….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 294.
“…the city. As Davis’ five ironclads approached within range, two of Ellet’s rams, Queen of
the West and Monarch, darted ahead of the attackers to deliver the first blows. The surprised
Confederate vessels, expecting to fight only sluggish gunboats, were thrown into disorder.
The Queen of the West rammed and sank her first opponent, while the Monarch, slipping
between two others, saw the Confederate rams crash into each other. Then the big Union
gunboats closed in. In an hour’s melee four of the River Defense Fleet were sunk and three
captured.… “
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 294.
“…three captured. Only one escaped downstream. None of the Union ships was lost. Flag
Officer Davis accepted the surrenderer of Memphis, reported four large river steamers
seized as prizes, and, by 1100 that morning, turned the city over to Col Fitch for occupation
by a detachment of the Indiana brigade. The Mississippi was now open to Federal gunboats as
far S as Vicksburg.
From New Orleans to Vicksburg
Ibid.
“Neither Farragut nor the captains of his fleet were at all happy in their irregular advance
up the Mississippi during the month following the occupation of New Orleans. If the
Hartford had been a great sperm whale from the Pacific, she could not have been more out
of her element—fighting the mud, snags, driftwood, current, and unending corkscrew
bends of the river. ‘The elements of destruction to the Navy in this river are beyond anything I
ever encountered, and if the same destruction continues the whole Navy will be destroyed in twelve
months,’ Farragut lamented. ‘More anchors have been lost and vessels ruined than I have seen in a
lifetime, and those vessels which do not run into others are themselves run into and crushed in such
a manner as to render them unseaworthy…their sides are smashed in, their cutwaters entirely
broomed up and removed….They all require more or less repairs in their machinery, but the hulls all
require docking—ribs broken, plank sheer gone, stems torn off to the wood ends, etc.’1
“Baton Rouge, then a town of 7,000 people, was occupied on 8 May, and the ships pressed
on. Even with the large Federal sloops in danger of being trapped hundreds of miles above
New Orleans when the spring flood waters subsided, Farragut had no choice but to carry
out his original orders….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
______
1 Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of the Great Rebellion, Series I, XVIII, 521.
From New Orleans to Vicksburg
Ibid.
“…original orders. He sent the gunboats ahead and followed after them. On 12 May the
Iroquois accepted the nominal surrender of Natchez, and by 18 May the Oneida was off
Vicksburg demanding its surrender. The Military Governor there boasted,
‘Mississippians don’t know, and refuse to learn, how to surrender to an enemy.’2 Farragut
transferred his flag to the Kennebec and was himself off Vicksburg four days later to
determine the best course of action. ‘There is very little use in attacking Vicksburg,’ he
wrote Gen Butler, ‘as the guns on the height are so elevated that our fire will not be felt by
them.’ He decided to leave the gunboats to blockade Vicksburg ‘until the battle of Corinth
shall decide its fate,’3 and returned to New Orleans with the heavy ships.
“Instead of waiting for Halleck’s army to move, Farragut would willingly have taken
prompt action against Mobile.• Porter was all for it but a message from his friend Fox •
showed how the wind blew in Washington. The Assistant Secretary wrote in a dispatch to
Porter on 17 May, while Farragut was in fact at Natchez, ‘someone has made a serious blunder
in persuading the flag Officer to go at Mobile instead of obeying his instructions to go up the
Mississippi River.’….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
______
2 Ibid., 492.
3 Ibid., 507.
From New Orleans to Vicksburg
op. cit., pp. 294-295.
“…Mississippi River.’ He added rather hysterically and on the strength of nothing more
than the Plum Point Bend fracas, ‘Davis has repulsed the iron rams of the enemy, but they are
going at him and if they should be successful, Halleck would have to fall back and we should lose St.
Louis, Cairo and everything.’4 The Confederate rams were of wood, not iron, and they made
no second try, but Fox’s message serves to underscore the official recognition of control of
the waterways as sine qua non for successful Federal military ops in the Mississippi Valley.
“From New Orleans Farragut sent in a full-length report to Secretary Welles,• beginning
almost wistfully: ‘I have just arrived here from up the river as high as Vicksburg, at least 300 miles
farther than I was ever from sea water before since the days of my childhood.’5 Clearly he
considered it quixotic to ascend the river again. Nevertheless, after suggesting to Welles
that a monitor would be a more appropriate ship, he obediently set the Hartford to
shepherding a flock of Porter’s mortar boats and a segment of Butler’s army N toward
Vicksburg.
“Midway between Memphis and New Orleans, Vicksburg occupied the naturally
strongest point on the river and the only one that was then fortified by the
Confederacy….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
______
4 Richard S. West, Jr., The Second Admiral (New York, 1937), 149.
5 Official Records, XVIII, 519.
From New Orleans to Vicksburg
“…the Confederacy. Halleck’s 100,000 men were now idle victors at Corinth, 300 miles
away, but only 80 miles by rail from Memphis whence steamers could easily transport a
large army, its artillery and supplies, to Vicksburg. If 20,000 troops under Grant had been
sent down at this time,• they would certainly have captured the city. But Halleck was
taking no chances—and winning no further victories.•
When Farragut arrived for the second time off Vicksburg, the cooperating land forces
were still too weak to attempt a frontal assault. On 28 Jun he ran past the Vicksburg
batteries with eight of his ships, three turning back in the confusion of battle. As Farragut
had predicted, fleet fire had little effect on Confederate guns emplaced on the heights.•
“Davis had come down the river from Memphis without hindrance and at last the
inland and sea-going navies were joined….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 295.
From New Orleans to Vicksburg
Ibid.
“…were joined. In vain Farragut wrote Halleck for army reinforcements. The Federal
offensive had stalled in its tracks. A year and a week would pass after Farragut’s
rendezvous with Davis before the Stars and Stripes flew over Vicksburg.
“As President Lincoln with prophetic foresight had told Cdr Porter in Nov 61, when they
were discussing plans for the capture of New Orleans: ‘…we must have troops enough not
only to hold New Orleans, but to proceed at once to Vicksburg, which is the key to all that country
watered by the Mississippi and its tributaries. If the Confederates once fortify the neighboring hills,
they will be able to hold that point for an indefinite time, and it will require a large force to dislodge
them.’”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Failure of the First
Attack
The Battle of Chickasaw Bayou, also called
the Battle of Walnut Hills,[2]
fought December
26–29, 1862, was the opening engagement of
the Vicksburg Campaign.... Confederate
forces under LGen. John C. Pemberton
repulsed an advance by Union MGen.
William T. Sherman that was intended to lead
to the capture of Vicksburg,…—Wikipedia
Map of the Vicksburg Campaign December 62 - March 63. (detail).www.dean.usma.edu/history/web03/atlases/american_civil_war/
index.htm
Ibid.
“When three of Farragut’s ships failed to follow
the Hartford around the horseshoe bend of the
Mississippi past the guns at Vicksburg, the
Admiral’s troubles had just begun. Ostensibly of
course 1 Jul 62 was a day of Union triumph. That
was the day when the fresh water and salt water
navies joined forces and anchored above the city.
Only a narrow neck of land separated them from
the warships and troop transports that remained
below. Casualties inflicted during the run past
had been very light.• Gen Halleck now informed
Farragut that he would be able to send down
troops in a few weeks, even though none were
available at the moment. The three Union
commanders at Vicksburg—Farragut, Davis, and
BGen Thomas Williams,….”
Operations in the Vicksburg Area
—Summer, 1862
Ibid.
“…Thomas Williams, whose 3,000 soldiers had
been escorted up the river by the navy—agreed
that no assault should be attempted until
reinforcements arrived from Corinth. In the
meantime, to harass MGen Earl Van Dorn • and
his 15,000 men working on the city’s
fortifications, four of Davis’ mortar boats above
Vicksburg supplemented 16 of • Porter’s below
in lobbing their shells into the Confederate
positions. Lookouts in the Hartford reported
occasional hits….”
Operations in the Vicksburg Area
—Summer, 1862
op. cit., pp. 295-296.
“…occasional hits. At the same time the Union army turned to digging a canal across the
narrow neck of land between the two segments of the fleet.•A new channel which would
by-pass Vicksburg beyond range of the city’s guns might even make a direct assault on the
Confederate position unnecessary. Neither undertaking progresses very far….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Operations in the Vicksburg Area
—Summer, 1862
The First Canal
op. cit., pp. 295-296.
“…very far. The mortar bombardment was no more than started when orders arrived
from Secretary Welles transferring Porter and 12 of the mortar boats 2,000 miles to the
aid of McClellan in VA.• The canal diggers, stricken by steaming heat and malaria, soon
had over a third of their number on the sick list. The navy’s binnacle lists were almost as
long. By mid-Jul the Union position off Vicksburg was clearly becoming untenable.• At last
Halleck admitted that he could not send an army. Farragut was worried, for his large
ships, needed on blockade duty in the Gulf, might be trapped in the river by low water.
….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Operations in the Vicksburg Area
—Summer, 1862
op. cit., pp. 295-296.
“…low water. Action, when it came, was the result of the audacity of a single Confederate
ironclad gunboat, the Arkansas.•
“During those critical weeks of Jun and early Jul, one of the many Confederate defense
projects was completion of the Arkansas, which to escape capture at Memphis had been
towed to an improvised navy yard at Yazoo City on the Yazoo River N of Vicksburg….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Operations in the Vicksburg Area
—Summer, 1862
The Yazoo River was named by French
explorer La Salle in 1682 as "Rivière des
Yazous" in reference to the Yazoo tribe
living near the river's mouth at its
confluence with the Mississippi. The exact
meaning of the term is unclear. One long
held belief is that it means "river of death”.
—Wikipedia
Besides having a great name,
the Yazoo, here outlined in
broader Cyan, is the eastern
border of the Mississippi
Delta country—jbp
“…of Vicksburg. The ship was much like the Union ironclads in size appearance and
armament.• In lieu of armor plate, railroad rails covered her casemate. Her engine drove
two propellers, but her machinery was entirely inadequate and never dependable….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 296.
Operations in the Vicksburg Area
—Summer, 1862
“…never dependable. When she was completed in mid-Jul, the Confederates set in motion
a grandiose plan for her to run down the Yazoo and through the Union fleet to Vicksburg,
help liberate New Orleans, and eventually join the Confederate defense of Mobile.
“On 15 Jul, the very day that the Arkansas steamed down the Yazoo, the ironclad
Carondelet, the wooden gunboat Tyler, and the ram Queen of the West set out on a
reconnaissance up the Yazoo. When the Union ships encountered the Confederate, they
turned and ran. What followed, Secretary Welles described as ‘The most disreputable naval
affair of the war.’6 After forcing the Carondelet aground and pursuing the others right into
the midst of the Union fleet where she received numerous hits, the Arkansas steamed at a
majestic two knots—her crippled engines could drive her no faster—through the
completely surprised Union ships and to temporary safety under the guns of Vicksburg….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 296.
Operations in the Vicksburg Area
—Summer, 1862
______
6 Charles Lee Lewis, David Glasgow Farragut: Our First Admiral, (Annapolis, 1943), 123.
Ibid.
“…of Vicksburg. With ‘deep mortification,’ Farragut officially reported, ‘none of us had steam
nor could get it up in time to pursue her, but she took the broadside of the whole fleet.’7 Battered
though she was, the Arkansas now threatened the mortar boats and transports below the
city. That night Farragut took his fleet and the ram Sumter past Vicksburg in an
unsuccessful attempt to sink her. A few days later the ironclad Essex and the ram Queen of
the West participated in an equally unsuccessful daylight attempt. Just at that juncture
Farragut received orders giving him permission to withdraw downstream. The ships of
the salt water fleet, with the Essex and Sumter and Gen Williams’ army (by this time 75%
incapacitated by illness), departed with alacrity….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Operations in the Vicksburg Area
—Summer, 1862
______
7 Official Records, XIX, 4.
Ibid.
“…with alacrity. Shortly afterwards,
Davis took the fresh water navy 300
miles upstream to base at Helena, AR.
Thus, by default, 500 miles of the
Mississippi were reopened to the
Confederacy.
“Delighted by this turn of events, Gen
Van Dorn immediately dispatched part of
the Vicksburg garrison to join other
Confederate troops under • MGen John C.
Breckenridge in an effort to recapture
Baton Rouge….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Operations in the Vicksburg Area
—Summer, 1862
op. cit., pp. 296-297.
“…Baton Rouge. To make a simultaneous attack, as planned, the Arkansas cast off her lines
at Vicksburg and had steamed within sight of Baton Rouge when her engines broke down.
The Confederate army’s assault was repulsed thanks in good part to the Essex and two
Union gunboats, which fired over the town and into the Confederate ranks as directed by a
naval officer who had a clear view of the action from the top of the Louisiana State House.
The Arkansas’ crew worked all that day and night to get their ship back into operation.
When the Essex led a reinforced Union fleet upstream against her the next day, the Arkansas
steamed out, but her engines immediately broke down again and she drifted helplessly
ashore. Her crew, at last forced to abandon ship, set her afire to prevent her capture by the
Union flotilla. The Essex threw in shells from a safe distance until the Arkansas was
destroyed by the explosion of her own magazine….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Operations in the Vicksburg Area
—Summer, 1862
CSS Arkansas USS Essex
op. cit., pp. 296-297.
“…own magazine.
“Gen Williams had been
killed in the battle, and the
outnumbered Union troops
were soon afterwards
withdrawn from Baton
Rouge. In the meantime the
defeated Confederate forces
began to fortify Port
Hudson, on the E bank if
the Mississippi a few miles
upstream from Baton
Rouge. Port Hudson’s
fortifications were intended
to stop Union offensives
from the S, as Vicksburg had
so successfully stoped those
from the N….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Operations in the Vicksburg Area
—Summer, 1862
“As the geographical advantage had
favored the North in breaking the first and
second lines of Confederate defense, now
the advantage shifted to the South. At one
time in the geological history of the
Mississippi Valley, a long arm of the sea had
extended up from the Gulf of Mexico even
beyond present-day Cairo, IL.•The bay thus
formed, filled with sediment from many
rivers, finally became an alluvial plain, so flat
that the Mississippi meandered along
numerous, shifting coils….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Vicksburg —
Port Hudson Bastion
op. cit., p. 297.
Cairo
“…shifting coils. Wherever the river
ricocheted against the foot of the
bluffs—the shoreline of the ancient sea
—that bounded the plain to E and W,
it created what became in the Civil
War a natural strongpoint for the
Confederate defenders. Columbus,
Fort Pillow, Memphis, Vicksburg,
Grand Gulf, and Port Hudson were all
such natural strongpoints on the E
bank. Of these Vicksburg was
paramount. (see map page 300.)….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Vicksburg —
Port Hudson Bastion
op. cit., p. 297.
“…page 300.)
“Geography left Vicksburg vulnerable to attack only from the firm ground E of, or
behind, the city. On the N the Yazoo basin, an elliptically shaped flood plain bounded on
the E by the bluffs and on the W by the Mississippi extended 200 miles to Memphis….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Vicksburg —
Port Hudson Bastion
op. cit., p. 297.
Ibid.
“…to Memphis. On the S another basin extended from Vicksburg W of the Mississippi all the
way to the Gulf,…”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Vicksburg —
Port Hudson Bastion
Ibid.
“…the Gulf, and on the E bank the town of Grand Gulf and the Big Black River covered the
city’s southern flank.•   Where the Mississippi made almost a 180º turn in front of
Vicksburg, the sloping E bank reached its greatest height of 264 feet, the high point of a 30-
mile ridge extending N to Haynes Bluff on the Yazoo and S to Grand Gulf on the
Mississippi….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Vicksburg —
Port Hudson Bastion
Ibid.
“…the Mississippi. During the second half of
1862 the Confederates made this entire ridge
part of an integrated system of fortifications
and the northern anchor of their defense
bastion.
“Port Hudson, 150 miles S of Vicksburg,
commanded a similar bend of the river from
similar heights. Because it was never
threatened by forces as powerful as those the
Union brought against Vicksburg, its defenses
were less fully developed.• Port Hudson’s
importance as a southern anchor for the
Confederate defense was not so much in
denying the Mississippi to the Federal
government as in preserving for the
Confederacy its last line of E-W
communications via the Red River….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Vicksburg —
Port Hudson Bastion
Ibid.
“…Red River. The Red River flowed into the Mississippi just above Port Hudson from
deep in the Confederacy’s SW. Down it came Confederate meat and grain in vast quantities
and European products shipped via Mexico. So long as the Confederacy held this line of
communications with the outside world, there persisted the hope that the war could be
pursued until foreign intervention or Northern war-weariness brought hostilities to an
end. But if either Vicksburg or Port Hudson fell, the Red River would be blocked, and
the fall of the remaining strong points must shortly follow. With the Mississippi firmly
in Union hands, the ‘backbone of the rebellion’ would be broken.”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Vicksburg —
Port Hudson Bastion
op. cit., pp. 297-298.
“The successful Confederate counterattack
under Gen Braxton Bragg • which had
penetrated almost as far as Louisville, KY
during the summer of 1862 had thoroughly
alarmed the Federal government. [And the
military authorities in Cincinnati. It was the
closest the war had come to here up to that
point.] There was a consequent reshuffling of
armies and commanders….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Failure of the First Attack
on Vicksburg
op. cit., pp. 297-298.
“…and commanders. Grant’s forces holding the Memphis-Corinth line were so reduced
in numbers that they had all they could do to maintain their position while awaiting
reinforcements through the summer and early fall of 1862. A clash at Iuka [MS], SE of
Corinth,• resulted in a concentrating of Confederate forces…”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Failure of the First Attack
on Vicksburg
op. cit., pp. 297-298.
“…Confederate forces and gave Gen Van Dorn hope that he might be able to defeat Grant’s
divided army in detail and force the Union troops all the way back to Fort Donelson. Van
Dorn’s attack in Oct accomplished just the opposite result.• The Confederates lost 5,000 men—
casualties and prisoners—….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., pp. 297-298.
“…and prisoners— and Van Dorn was
replaced by the more cautious John C.
Pemberton.• Grant was at last free to
resume the offensive….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Failure of the First Attack
on Vicksburg
“…the offensive.
“Since retiring to Helena after the Arkansas fiasco, Flag Officer Davis’ gunboats, on the
defensive, trying to hold what had previously been gained, had been fighting guerrillas
and convoying supplies on the Ohio, Cumberland, Tennessee, and Mississippi rivers. In
Oct the 15 river gunboats were transferred from the Army to the Navy and as the
‘Mississippi Squadron,’ were placed under the command of David Dixon Porter,• now back
from VA. Porter immediately reorganized his force along navy lines, had the older ships
repaired and more heavily armed, and began adding new ironclads and ‘tinclad’ patrol
craft to the fleet until eventually he had more than 60 vessels of various sorts….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 298.
Failure of the First Attack
on Vicksburg
“…various sorts. Meanwhile he established himself on his flagship, the large river steamer
Black Hawk,• with adequate facilities for administering his command….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 298.
Failure of the First Attack
on Vicksburg
“…his command.
“In Nov 62 Grant at last received permission from Washington to launch an offensive. His
main base of supply at this time was at Columbus; his operational base, at Grand Junction;
and his advance supply base at Holly Springs. His army depended for communications
on a single rail line joining those points….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 298.
Failure of the First Attack
on Vicksburg
“…his command.
“In Nov 62 Grant at last received permission from Washington to launch an offensive. His
main base of supply at this time was at Columbus; his operational base, at Grand Junction;
and his advance supply base at Holly Springs. His army depended for communications
on a single rail line joining those points….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 298.
Failure of the First Attack
on Vicksburg
“…those points… His objective was the
major Confederate base at Jackson, the
capital of Mississippi, which flanked
Vicksburg just as Corinth flanked
Memphis. He knew that the Confederate
Army, after withdrawing as far as
Grenada, was preparing to contest his
advance. Grant’s plan was to trap the
Confederate forces by making a double
attack.…”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 298.
Failure of the First Attack
on Vicksburg
“…double attack. A combined op of
some 32,000 men under Sherman,•
supported by Porter, would depart from
Memphis by ship for a direct attack on
Vicksburg.…”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 298.
Failure of the First Attack
on Vicksburg
“…on Vicksburg. In the meantime Grant
himself would attack Grenada,
expecting to fight a holding action which
would keep so many Confederate
soldiers occupied that Sherman would
have no trouble.…”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 298.
Failure of the First Attack
on Vicksburg
Ibid.
“…no trouble. If the Confederate forces at
Grenada retreated to Vicksburg, Grant
would pursue and trap them there. If they
retreated only Jackson, he would pursue
and be joined by Sherman’s troops
fromVicksburg. Grant’s plan, for all its
ostensible logic, was wrecked by its
dependence on an inadequate line of
communications.
“The Confederate defense plan was
perforce flexible and opportunistic.
Likelihood of a Federal offensive had
caused • President Davis to visit both
Jackson and Vicksburg in early Dec. He
recognized their weakness and, in
attempting to find a remedy, may have
committed one of the great blunders of
the war.…”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Failure of the First Attack
on Vicksburg
Ibid.
“…the war. Instead of ordering reinforcements from the secondary AR theater of ops, as
advised by • Gen Joseph Johnston, who was now in command of all Confederate forces
between the Mississippi and Alleghenies, the Confederate President had 10,000 men
transferred to • Pemberton from eastern TN. This was just 11 days before the great battle
of Stone’s River that ended the East TN campaign in Confederate defeat. Even with these
reinforcements, Pemberton had strength only for a delaying action. But the winter rains
favored the defense as roads turned to mud, and the railroad down which the
Confederates retreated, tearing up rails and ties as they went, would require time-
consuming repairs before it would be of much use to the Union invaders.
“Making excellent use of their interior position and knowledge of the terrain, the
Southern generals proceeded to teach Grant some lessons. First, a raid by • Forrest’s
cavalry cut the telegraph and wrecked the rail line between Grant’s advancing army and
his main base at Columbus. For exactly those twelve days (19-30 Dec) during which
Sherman took his army down-river and attacked Vicksburg, Grant had no communication
with the outside world.…”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Failure of the First Attack
on Vicksburg
Ibid.
“…outside world. The fatal blow was
struck by Van Dorn with 2,500 men on a
cavalry raid around Grant’s flank.
Catching the 1,500 man guard at • Holly
Springs completely by surprise, Van
Dorn’s men destroyed the entire
$1,500,000 supply dump.…”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Failure of the First Attack
on Vicksburg
Ibid.
“…supply dump. With no logistic
support, Grant’s army ignominiously
retreated 80 miles to Grand Junction,
living off the land.• Not only did Grant’s
holding action collapse, but the
Confederate regiments that faced him at
Grenada were shifted by rail to
Vicksburg in time to parry the second
Union blow.…”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Failure of the First Attack
on Vicksburg
Ibid.
“…Union blow.
“Sherman and Porter meanwhile had
reached the Vicksburg area via the
Mississippi.…”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Failure of the First Attack
on Vicksburg
op. cit., pp. 298-299.
“…the Mississippi. Porter’s task now was to convoy the transports into the Yazoo and
protect them during the debarkation. First however the gunboats had to clear the lower
Yazoo of mines, one of which sank the ironclad Cairo. The river fleet continued
minesweeping until the Yazoo was cleared from its mouth, eight miles above Vicksburg, to
Haynes Bluff, where Confederate batteries controlled the river.• The day after Christmas
Sherman’s troops, virtually unopposed under cover of the gunboats, landed on the flats
between the Mississippi and the high ground to the E. By this time Sherman had good
reason to suspect that Grant was meeting resistance, but he had no way of learning what
actually had happened. He could only proceed on the assumption that the ‘holding action’
was not so unsuccessful as to expose his own Vicksburg attack to certain defeat.…”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Failure of the First Attack
on Vicksburg
op. cit., pp. 298-299.
“…certain defeat.
“In drenching Dec rain, the Union forces deployed for assault along the five paths that
led through swamplands to the Confederate fortifications on the bluffs. Though Sherman’s
troops outnumbered the Confederates three to one, the defenders’ strongly entrenched
position on the heights gave them an immense advantage, for the Union columns,
confined to narrow approaches, could not bring their numbers to bear on a broad front.…”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Failure of the First Attack
on Vicksburg
“…broad front. In the Battle of Chickasaw Bluffs on the 29th, every Union attempt to storm
the well-placed Confederate fortifications crumpled under massed artillery and rifle fire.
At the end of the day Sherman had lost 2,000 men; the Confederates, only 187.
“Sherman nevertheless planned a second attack for the new year. This time it was to
be a night assault by 10,000 troops farther up the Yazoo, where the Confederate batteries
were within range of the heavy guns of Porter’s fleet. Dense fog delayed the troop-laden
gunboats so long that only a suicidal daylight attack would have been possible. By this
time it was clearly evident to both Sherman and Porter that Grant’s plans had gone awry
and that in view of the rising river waters and the continuous rain, the only sensible choice
was to withdraw.
“In their first attempt to capture Vicksburg, Grant, Sherman, and Porter thus tasted the
humiliation of defeat by numerically inferior forces.”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Failure of the First Attack
on Vicksburg
op. cit., p. 299.
Winter Campaign
Gives towns, Fort Pemberton, railroads,
drainage, and the location of "Gen.
Grant's Army 75000" opposite Vicksburg.
Brief notes describe the "land lying
between the Mississippi and Yazoo
rivers" and the first and second "inland
expedition[s] of the enemy."--Wiki
Hardie, T.S. (detail), title, above. Published by S.H. Goetzle & Co. Mobile, AL., 1 May 1863.
“Mud, politics, and common sense finally compelled Grant to transfer his base of ops to
the Mississippi in the winter of 1862-63. The heavy rains of an unusually wet season
turned all roads into quagmires. If the Union Army was to advance in strength with
artillery support, it must be by ship. After the failure of the Chickasaw Bluffs attack, Adm
Porter and Gen Sherman had cooperated in a face-saving op against Arkansas Post…. ”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
op. cit., pp. 299, 301.
“Mud, politics, and common sense finally compelled Grant to transfer his base of ops to
the Mississippi in the winter of 1862-63. The heavy rains of an unusually wet season
turned all roads into quagmires. If the Union Army was to advance in strength with
artillery support, it must be by ship. After the failure of the Chickasaw Bluffs attack, Adm
Porter and Gen Sherman had cooperated in a face-saving op against Arkansas Post,•
where taking 5,000 Confederate prisoners had cost a thousand Federal casualties.• This
undertaking was commanded by Gen John A. McClernand,• an Illinois politician who had
talked President Lincoln into allowing him to raise troops in IL for an independent
expedition against Vicksburg. To his everlasting credit,• Halleck thwarted this threat to a
unified command: the upshot was that McClernand took a position over Sherman but
subordinate to Grant. The Arkansas Post victory removed a nuisance from the Union flank
but did not justify a general diversion of about 30,000 men to a trans-Mississippi
campaign. Grant ordered an end to that ‘wild goose chase,’ as he correctly called it and by
the end of Jan took command on the Mississippi himself as the only way of controlling
both McClernand and the Vicksburg campaign…. ”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
op. cit., pp. 299, 301.
“Mud, politics, and common sense finally compelled Grant to transfer his base of ops to
the Mississippi in the winter of 1862-63. The heavy rains of an unusually wet season
turned all roads into quagmires. If the Union Army was to advance in strength with
artillery support, it must be by ship. After the failure of the Chickasaw Bluffs attack, Adm
Porter and Gen Sherman had cooperated in a face-saving op against Arkansas Post,•
where taking 5,000 Confederate prisoners had cost a thousand Federal casualties.• This
undertaking was commanded by Gen John A. McClernand,• an Illinois politician who had
talked President Lincoln into allowing him to raise troops in IL for an independent
expedition against Vicksburg. To his everlasting credit,• Halleck thwarted this threat to a
unified command: the upshot was that McClernand took a position over Sherman but
subordinate to Grant. The Arkansas Post victory removed a nuisance from the Union flank
but did not justify a general diversion of about 30,000 men to a trans-Mississippi
campaign. Grant ordered an end to that ‘wild goose chase,’ as he correctly called it and by
the end of Jan took command on the Mississippi himself as the only way of controlling
both McClernand and the Vicksburg campaign…. ”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
op. cit., pp. 299, 301.
“Mud, politics, and common sense finally compelled Grant to transfer his base of ops to
the Mississippi in the winter of 1862-63. The heavy rains of an unusually wet season
turned all roads into quagmires. If the Union Army was to advance in strength with
artillery support, it must be by ship. After the failure of the Chickasaw Bluffs attack, Adm
Porter and Gen Sherman had cooperated in a face-saving op against Arkansas Post,•
where taking 5,000 Confederate prisoners had cost a thousand Federal casualties.• This
undertaking was commanded by Gen John A. McClernand,• an Illinois politician who had
talked President Lincoln into allowing him to raise troops in IL for an independent
expedition against Vicksburg. To his everlasting credit,• Halleck thwarted this threat to a
unified command: the upshot was that McClernand took a position over Sherman but
subordinate to Grant. The Arkansas Post victory removed a nuisance from the Union flank
but did not justify a general diversion of about 30,000 men to a trans-Mississippi
campaign. Grant ordered an end to that ‘wild goose chase,’ as he correctly called it and by
the end of Jan took command on the Mississippi himself as the only way of controlling
both McClernand and the Vicksburg campaign…. ”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
op. cit., pp. 299, 301.
“Mud, politics, and common sense finally compelled Grant to transfer his base of ops to
the Mississippi in the winter of 1862-63. The heavy rains of an unusually wet season
turned all roads into quagmires. If the Union Army was to advance in strength with
artillery support, it must be by ship. After the failure of the Chickasaw Bluffs attack, Adm
Porter and Gen Sherman had cooperated in a face-saving op against Arkansas Post,•
where taking 5,000 Confederate prisoners had cost a thousand Federal casualties.• This
undertaking was commanded by Gen John A. McClernand,• an Illinois politician who had
talked President Lincoln into allowing him to raise troops in IL for an independent
expedition against Vicksburg. To his everlasting credit,• Halleck thwarted this threat to a
unified command: the upshot was that McClernand took a position over Sherman but
subordinate to Grant. The Arkansas Post victory removed a nuisance from the Union flank
but did not justify a general diversion of about 30,000 men to a trans-Mississippi
campaign. Grant ordered an end to that ‘wild goose chase,’ as he correctly called it and by
the end of Jan took command on the Mississippi himself as the only way of controlling
both McClernand and the Vicksburg campaign…. ”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
op. cit., pp. 299, 301.
“Mud, politics, and common sense finally
compelled Grant to transfer his base of ops
to the Mississippi in the winter of 1862-63.
The heavy rains of an unusually wet season
turned all roads into quagmires. If the
Union Army was to advance in strength
with artillery support, it must be by ship.
After the failure of the Chickasaw Bluffs
attack, Adm Porter and Gen Sherman had
cooperated in a face-saving op against
Arkansas Post,• where taking 5,000
Confederate prisoners had cost a thousand
Federal casualties.• This undertaking was
commanded by Gen John A. McClernand,•
an Illinois politician who had talked
President Lincoln into allowing him to raise
troops in IL for an independent expedition
against Vicksburg…. ”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
op. cit., pp. 299, 301.
“Mud, politics, and common sense finally compelled Grant to transfer his base of ops to
the Mississippi in the winter of 1862-63. The heavy rains of an unusually wet season
turned all roads into quagmires. If the Union Army was to advance in strength with
artillery support, it must be by ship. After the failure of the Chickasaw Bluffs attack, Adm
Porter and Gen Sherman had cooperated in a face-saving op against Arkansas Post,•
where taking 5,000 Confederate prisoners had cost a thousand Federal casualties.• This
undertaking was commanded by Gen John A. McClernand,• an Illinois politician who had
talked President Lincoln into allowing him to raise troops in IL for an independent
expedition against Vicksburg. To his everlasting credit,• Halleck thwarted this threat to a
unified command: the upshot was that McClernand took a position over Sherman but
subordinate to Grant. The Arkansas Post victory removed a nuisance from the Union flank
but did not justify a general diversion of about 30,000 men to a trans-Mississippi
campaign. Grant ordered an end to that ‘wild goose chase,’ as he correctly called it and by
the end of Jan took command on the Mississippi himself as the only way of controlling
both McClernand and the Vicksburg campaign…. ”
op. cit., pp. 299, 301.
“…Vicksburg campaign. He established his combined army on the W bank at Milliken’s
Bend just above Vicksburg with his rear base at Memphis 400 miles upstream.
”Too strong to be stormed, the Vicksburg defenses had to be flanked. The problem
was : how? High water made it impossible to march an army past Vicksburg through the
cypress swamps and flooded underbrush of the W shore, and even supposing troops
could get past, no line of communications could be maintained on the river under
Vicksburg’s guns. Grant seems to have believed that nothing decisive could be
accomplished until the land again became dry enough for marching, but he was willing to
try any likely alternatives that would keep his forces occupied and satisfy the impatience
of his superiors. Actually, four ingenious schemes were undertaken during the winter of
62-63, and these together constitute the second campaign against Vicksburg.….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
op. cit., p. 301.
“…Vicksburg campaign. He established his combined army on the W bank at Milliken’s
Bend just above Vicksburg with his rear base at Memphis 400 miles upstream.
”Too strong to be stormed, the Vicksburg defenses had to be flanked. The problem
was : how? High water made it impossible to march an army past Vicksburg through the
cypress swamps and flooded underbrush of the W shore, and even supposing troops
could get past, no line of communications could be maintained on the river under
Vicksburg’s guns. Grant seems to have believed that nothing decisive could be
accomplished until the land again became dry enough for marching, but he was willing to
try any likely alternatives that would keep his forces occupied and satisfy the impatience
of his superiors. Actually, four ingenious schemes were undertaken during the winter of
62-63, and these together constitute the second campaign against Vicksburg.
“(1) Grant’s ‘Big Ditch.’ While Farragut and Davis dallied above Vicksburg in Jul 62,•
Gen Williams’ troops had actually made a good beginning on their canal across the finger
of land pointing towards the Confederate stronghold….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
op. cit., p. 301.
“…Vicksburg campaign. He established his combined army on the W bank at Milliken’s
Bend just above Vicksburg with his rear base at Memphis 400 miles upstream.
”Too strong to be stormed, the Vicksburg defenses had to be flanked. The problem
was : how? High water made it impossible to march an army past Vicksburg through the
cypress swamps and flooded underbrush of the W shore, and even supposing troops
could get past, no line of communications could be maintained on the river under
Vicksburg’s guns. Grant seems to have believed that nothing decisive could be
accomplished until the land again became dry enough for marching, but he was willing to
try any likely alternatives that would keep his forces occupied and satisfy the impatience
of his superiors. Actually, four ingenious schemes were undertaken during the winter of
62-63, and these together constitute the second campaign against Vicksburg.
“(1) Grant’s ‘Big Ditch.’ While Farragut and Davis dallied above Vicksburg in Jul 62,•
Gen Williams’ troops had actually made a good beginning on their canal across the finger
of land pointing towards the Confederate stronghold….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
op. cit., p. 301.
“…Confederate stronghold. The falling level of the Mississippi and the Federal
government’s opinion that the fate of Vicksburg was going to be settled by a great Union
victory under • Halleck in the vicinity of Corinth made completion of the canal less
important than saving the lives of the malaria-infected soldiers….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
Ibid.
“…malaria-infected soldiers. Now, in the winter of 63, this project was revived, for it was
remembered that a canal had succeeded at Island No. 10. The new ditch was to be a little
over a mile long, 60 feet wide, and nine feet deep. The Northern press played up the
progress the Army Engineers were making, trumpeting great expectations. By 8 Mar the
goal was almost reached and flood waters were sweeping down the Mississippi to break
through the last barrier. But instead of gouging out the last of the canal, the tumultuous
waters flooded the peninsula, drowned horses and mules, swept away tents, destroyed
machinery, made men flee for their lives to high ground, and plugged with silt and debris
what canal there had been. The opponents of the canal who from the first had considered it
an unholy interference with nature felt that their opinion had been vindicated….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
Ibid.
“…been vindicated. The project was abandoned.
“(2) Lake Providence and the Tensas Basin. There was another possible way around
Vicksburg….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
Ibid.
“…around Vicksburg. By cutting through miles of Cypress swamp a route 400 miles long
could be constructed from Lake Providence, on the W bank of the Mississippi about 75
miles N of Vicksburg via the Bayou Baxter cypress swamp to Bayou Macon, then down the
Macon, Tensas, and Ouachita rivers to the Red, and finally down the Red River to the
Mississippi.• Presumably the route could be used for Grant’s troops to coordinate with •
Banks’ in the capture of Port Hudson, which would in turn become the base for an attack
from the S against Vicksburg. Union troops hacked away for two months at this
nightmarish project before Grant withdrew them to take part in his spring offensive….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
Ibid.
“(2) Lake Providence and the Tensas Basin. There was another possible way around
Vicksburg By cutting through miles of Cypress swamp a route 400 miles long could be
constructed from Lake Providence, on the W bank of the Mississippi about 75 miles N of
Vicksburg via the Bayou Baxter cypress swamp to Bayou Macon, then down the Macon,
Tensas, and Ouachita rivers to the Red, and finally down the Red River to the Mississippi.
….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
Ibid.
“…the Mississippi. Presumably the route
could be used for Grant’s troops to coordinate
with • Banks’ in the capture of Port Hudson,
which would in turn become the base for an
attack from the S against Vicksburg. Union
troops hacked away for two months at this
nightmarish project before Grant withdrew
them to take part in his spring offensive….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
Ibid.
“…spring offensive.
“(3) The Yazoo Pass Expedition. A more promising
possibility for a joint expedition consisted of opening
a route that would outflank Haynes Bluff,• the
northern point of the Vicksburg outer defense line.
Just S of Helena, AR and convenient to the Memphis
base lay Yazoo Pass • running from the Mississippi to
the tributaries of the Yazoo River….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
Ibid.
“…spring offensive.
“(3) The Yazoo Pass Expedition. A more promising
possibility for a joint expedition consisted of opening
a route that would outflank Haynes Bluff,• the
northern point of the Vicksburg outer defense line.
Just S of Helena, AR and convenient to the Memphis
base lay Yazoo Pass • running from the Mississippi to
the tributaries of the Yazoo River. Some steamboats
had regularly taken the route until it was plugged by
a flood-control levee in 1853. Shortly after Grant
established his HQ at Milliken’s Bend, Porter
broached the subject of this 700-mile outflanking
expedition and received the general’s approval. The
levee was blasted open and the waters of the
Mississippi poured through. Two ironclads, six
‘tinclads,’ and two rams led the way. They were
supported by 4,500 Union troops embarked in 13
transports….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
Ibid.
“…spring offensive.
“(3) The Yazoo Pass Expedition. A more promising
possibility for a joint expedition consisted of opening
a route that would outflank Haynes Bluff,• the
northern point of the Vicksburg outer defense line.
Just S of Helena, AR and convenient to the Memphis
base lay Yazoo Pass • running from the Mississippi to
the tributaries of the Yazoo River. Some steamboats
had regularly taken the route until it was plugged by
a flood-control levee in 1853. Shortly after Grant
established his HQ at Milliken’s Bend, Porter
broached the subject of this 700-mile outflanking
expedition and received the general’s approval. The
levee was blasted open and the waters of the
Mississippi poured through. Two ironclads, six
‘tinclads,’ and two rams led the way. They were
supported by 4,500 Union troops embarked in 13
transports….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
“…13 transports. The alert Confederates had felled
huge trees across the channel, some as much as four
feet in diameter and reaching from bank to bank. In
the two weeks it took the expedition to hack its way
through the Pass, a combination of narrow channels,
overhanging trees, cypress stumps, and debris,
abetted by Confederate sharpshooters, was unable to
stop the slow progress of the Union fleet. At the end
of a month’s struggle the ships were approaching the
final bend of the Tallahatchie where it joins the
Yalobusha to form the Yazoo. There the desperate
Confederate defenders were in the process of
throwing up an earthwork and cotton-bale
fortification, Fort Pemberton,• armed with two heavy
guns and supported by infantry….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
op. cit., pp. 301-302.
“…by infantry. Occupying a flooded peninsula, the
fort could not be attacked by anything short of
amphib infantry or ships painfully restricted by the
narrow, tortuous channel. This was the ‘roadblock’
that stopped the Union advance. During repeated
attacks made over a period of several weeks,…”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
op. cit., p. 302.
“…several weeks, each ironclad gunboat was severely
damaged. Since the Navy’s gunboats failed to silence
the fort and the Army was unable to stage an attack
over the flooded countryside, each service found fault
with the other. Reinforcements were brought up, but
by then the Union leaders had become more
interested in another alternative.• On 10 Apr the
entire expedition was back on the Mississippi with
nothing to show for the two months effort….”
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
op. cit., p. 302.
“…months effort.
“(4) The Steele’s Bayou Fiasco. At the very time
that the Union forces were attempting to batter
down Fort Pemberton, Adm Porter himself had
launched a final expedition aimed at opening a
route from the Mississippi to a point on the Yazoo
between Yazoo City and Haynes’ Bluff. If
successful, this attack would place the navigable,
upper stretches of the Yazoo in Federal hands,
bring about the abandonment of Yazoo City (and,
of course, of Fort Pemberton, which was in essence
a northern outpost of the Yazoo City defenses),
and secure a good advanced base in Yazoo City for
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
Ibid.
outflanking Vicksburg from the N. The route was even narrower and more tortuous than that
of the Yazoo Pass. Porter was able to push five of the old Eads ironclads through the forest of
cypress and willows, but the lighter warships and transports did not have power and weight
enough to fight their way through the willow-choked channel….”
“…willow-choked channel. Overhanging branches
knocked off smokestacks, cypress trees had to be
pulled up by their roots, and the willows had to be
chopped down one by one. Finally the flotilla
ground to a halt within sight of clear water but in
a tangle of felled trees. Confederate sharpshooters
kept the Union crews behind the protection of the
casemates, and the ironclads, walled in by the
levee on either side, found their big guns useless.
When Southern slaves were forced to fell trees
behind the gunboats, the expedition stood on the
brink of disaster. Only the prompt arrival of the
Army saved the ships.• Gen Sherman himself
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
Ibid.
accompanied the major relieving force, its way lighted by candles in a fantastic night march.
Porter’s feelings of relief found expression in his official report: ‘I do not know when I felt more
pleased to see that gallant officer….”8
______
8 Official Records, XXIV, 477.
“… gallant officer….”8 As it was, it took 11 days for the
ironclads to extricate themselves. The channel was so
narrow that the ships could not be turned around.
Rudders were unshipped and ‘rebounding from tree to
tree,’9 the ironclads reached the Mississippi on 27 Mar.
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
Ibid.
______
9 Alfred Thayer Mahan, The Gulf and Inland Waters, (New York,
1883, 150.
“…27 Mar.
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter Campaign
Against Vicksburg
Ibid.
“Porter was thoroughly discouraged. ‘With the end of this expedition ends all my hopes of getting
into Vicksburg in this direction….There is but one thing now to be done, and that is to start an army of
150,000 men from Memphis via Grenada, and let them go supplied with everything required to take
Vicksburg.’10
“Grant, influenced by recent developments on the Mississippi and the political temperature in
Washington, had other and more daring ideas. Advance through the Yazoo basin was hopeless,
as Porter said, but returning to Memphis would look like defeat, and an attack via Grenada
would require protecting a long LOC and rebuilding a railroad line as the army advanced.
Grant knew what that would mean from his bitter experience of the past Dec. Yet he had to get
behind Vicksburg. If he could not do it from the N, he would have to do it from the S.
______
10 Official Records, XXIV, 479.
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter’s Naval Activity
on the Mississippi
“Gen Banks had replaced Gen Butler in New Orleans at the end of 1862. More troops had
arrived. The grand strategy now called for a joint expedition under Banks and Farragut to
reduce Port Hudson, but neither the Army nor the Navy was ready. Banks’ position was very
complex and entirely thankless. He had earned the nickname of ‘Dancing Master’ through his
efforts to win over the influential citizens of the occupied city. He was plagued by speculators
with political backing who demanded that the Army make it possible for them to get out the
upland cotton. He was gravely concerned for the safety of NO, threatened more than once by
Confederate armies in the general vicinity. His strength was thus largely absorbed by a
multitude of tasks that had little to do with getting on with the war.•
“For Farragut too the year began badly. On New Year’s Day two cotton-armored steamers
with a single gun apiece captured the gunboat Harriet Lane and either seized or drove away the
other Union ships blockading Galveston, TX. In reporting to Welles, the Admiral admitted that
it would be difficult ‘to conceive a more pusillanimous surrenderer of a vessel to an enemy already in
our power.’11 Three weeks later the Confederates also opened the blockade off Sabine Pass, when
two of their cotton-clad gunboats took advantage of a calm day to capture the two Union sailing
ships stationed there. All efforts to re-establish the blockade at those points failed.
_____
11 Ibid., XIX, 440.
op. cit., pp. 302-303.
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter’s Naval Activity
on the Mississippi
“…points failed.
“On the Mississippi, the most important enterprise either Porter or Farragut could
undertake was to dispute control of the river between Vicksburg and Port Hudson and raid
the South’s Red River source of supply. Porter tried it first.•
“On 1 Feb, Col Charles Ellet received orders to run the ram Queen of the West past the
Vicksburg batteries, sink the steamer Vicksburg moored there, and then raid the Red River
commerce….” op. cit., p. 303.
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
The Winter’s Naval Activity
on the Mississippi
“…River commerce. The Union ram was hit repeatedly by solid shot and shell but got by the
city in broad daylight on the morning of the 2nd without a single casualty. En route she
damaged but did not sink the Vicksburg. Within the next few days the Queen of the West captured
several valuable prizes, including a steamer with 110,000 pounds of pork and 500 hogs and
another with 20 barrels of molasses, 10 hogsheads of sugar, and 30,000 pounds of flour. Both
vessels had been bound with their provisions for the Confederate army at Port Hudson.
“Porter sent the new ironclad • Indianola past Vicksburg on the night of 13-14 Feb to join Ellet.
That impetuous 19-year-old colonel had been raising havoc up the Red River, but the Queen of
the West grounded and was captured on the very day that the Indianola steamed down to join
her….” op. cit., p. 303.
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Ibid.
“…join her. Then the Confederates completely turned the tables. Using the Queen of the West to
head a flotilla, they pursued the Indianola and caught up with her just below Vicksburg, where
she was defeated, run aground and captured. The last, if wry, laugh was Porter’s. Because his
other ironclads were bulldozing the willows and cypress of the Yazoo Basin or patrolling
upriver, the Indianola and Queen of the West in Confederate hands posed a real danger. So the
Admiral had a coal barge equipped with barrel-pile smokestacks and log guns to look like a
monitor and floated her past Vicksburg at night. She grounded below the city on the W bank
but was pushed back into the stream by the Union troops stationed there. News of her coming
caused the apprehensive captors of the Indianola to blow up their stranded prize,…”
The Winter’s Naval Activity
on the Mississippi
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Ibid.
“…stranded prize, and the Queen of the West retreated to the Louisiana waterways where she
was eventually sunk by Farragut’s gunboats.•
“The goings-on around Vicksburg struck Farragut as so much tomfoolery. If Porter
intended to hold his ironclads for such time-wasting ops as the abortive Steele’s Bayou
expedition, Farragut considered it was up to him to regain control of the Mississippi….”
The Winter’s Naval Activity
on the Mississippi
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., pp. 303-304.
“…the Mississippi. When he learned of the capture of the Queen of the West and the Indianola, he
lost all patience. ‘I am all ready to make an attack on or run the batteries at Port Hudson,’ he wrote
Secretary Welles, ‘so as to form a junction with the army and navy above Vicksburg.’12 The fact that
Banks was ready to stage no more than a diversionary attack did not stop him. ‘The time has
come,’ said Farragut, ‘there can be no more delay. I must go—army or no army.’13
“Once again Farragut directed the detailed preparations for taking a fleet past fortifications.
This time he had the Hartford, Richmond, Monongahela, and Mississippi, with the gunboats
Albatross, Genessee, and Kineo. The large ships were to proceed in that order past Port Hudson,
each of the screw sloops with a gunboat lashed to her port quarter and the side-wheeler
Mississippi bringing up the rear….”
The Winter’s Naval Activity
on the Mississippi
_____
12 Ibid., XIX, 644.
13 Lewis, Farragut: Our First Admiral, 168.
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., pp. 303-304.
“…the Mississippi. When he learned of the capture of the Queen of the West and the Indianola, he
lost all patience. ‘I am all ready to make an attack on or run the batteries at Port Hudson,’ he wrote
Secretary Welles, ‘so as to form a junction with the army and navy above Vicksburg.’12 The fact that
Banks was ready to stage no more than a diversionary attack did not stop him. ‘The time has
come,’ said Farragut, ‘there can be no more delay. I must go—army or no army.’13
“Once again Farragut directed the detailed preparations for taking a fleet past fortifications.
This time he had the Hartford, Richmond, Monongahela, and Mississippi, with the gunboats
Albatross, Genessee, and Kineo. The large ships were to proceed in that order past Port Hudson,
each of the screw sloops with a gunboat lashed to her port quarter and the side-wheeler
Mississippi bringing up the rear.• A flotilla of mortar boats and the ironclad Essex were assigned
to shell the fortifications while the fleet steamed by. ‘I expect all to go by who are able,’ Farragut
wrote in his general order to his fleet, ‘and I think the best protection against the enemy’s fire is a
well-directed fire from our own guns—shell and shrapnel at a distance and grape when within 400 or 500
yards.’ ….”14
The Winter’s Naval Activity
on the Mississippi
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., pp. 303-304.
“…the rear. A flotilla of mortar boats and the ironclad Essex were assigned to shell the
fortifications while the fleet steamed by. ‘I expect all to go by who are able,’ Farragut wrote in his
general order to his fleet, ‘and I think the best protection against the enemy’s fire is a well-directed fire
from our own guns—shell and shrapnel at a distance and grape when within 400 or 500 yards.’ ….”14
The Winter’s Naval Activity
on the Mississippi
_____
14 Official Records, XIX, 669.
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 304.
“…500 yards.’
“Leading the way in the Hartford on the dark, quiet night of 14 Mar, Farragut was probably in the
best command position to accomplish his difficult undertaking. Besides a score of heavy Confederate
guns and half again as many field pieces, he had to contend with the five-knot current, a 150º bend
in the river, and the ingenuity of the defenders, who spotted the ships with locomotive headlights
from the E bank and silhouetted them against huge bonfires on the W bank.
“While making the sharp turn under Port Hudson’s batteries, the Hartford was thrown against the
shore, but with the aid of the Albatross alongside, she returned to the channel and proceeded
upstream.…”
The Winter’s Naval Activity
on the Mississippi
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 304.
“…proceeded upstream. Not another ship got past. The Richmond lost power when her steam safety
valves were opened by a freak hit, and the Monongahela went off course in the smoke and spent 25
minutes aground under fire. Both screw-sloops managed to escape downstream with the help of
their escorts. The Mississippi however went aground on the W bank directly opposite the
Confederate batteries. Here as she caught fire from enemy shells her crew abandoned ship. The next
morning she floated free, blew up, and sank.
“Although only two of his vessels had succeeded in running the gantlet, Farragut set about
determinedly patrolling the river between Vicksburg and Port Hudson so as to deny Red River
supplies to both Confederate strong points.• Meanwhile Grant was completing preparations for
his spring offensive.”
The Winter’s Naval Activity
on the Mississippi
Vicksburg, Port Hudson,
and the Red River
Campaign
A contemporary plan—Wikipedia
Surveyed by Lieut. L. A. Wrotnowski, Top: Engr., USA, title, above, 1863.
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Ibid.
“In early Apr 1863, the falling level of the
Mississippi finally made an overland route
down the W bank available to the Union
forces, and Grant began marching his army S.
His plan was to cross the river, capture Grand
Gulf, the southern outpost of the Vicksburg
defenses,…”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Ibid.
“…Vicksburg defenses, send 20,000 troops downstream to assist Banks in capturing Port Hudson,
and then use the combined armies in the eventual overwhelming of Vicksburg. He expected
Porter to run the ironclads past Vicksburg to support his crossing with their heavy guns.
“ On the night of 16 Apr the Union fleet got underway. Flares and roaring bonfires lighted up the
Federal ships for the Confederate gunners,…”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Ibid.
“…Confederate gunners, and the vagaries of the current threw each of the larger ships into at least
one 360º turn while passing the city. Remarkably enough, not a single Union sailor was killed and
not one ironclad was critically damaged. Of the three supply-laden transports, one was sunk. A few
nights later additional supply ships ran past Vicksburg to join the Union forces.
“When prolonged bombardment from the ironclads failed to knock out the batteries at Grand Gulf,
Grant and Porter shifted army and ships south…”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Ibid.
“In early Apr 1863, the falling level of the Mississippi finally made an overland route down the
W bank available to the Union forces, and Grant began marching his army S. His plan was to
cross the river, capture Grand Gulf, the southern outpost of the Vicksburg defenses,• send 20,000
troops downstream to assist • Banks in capturing Port Hudson, and then use the combined
armies in the eventual overwhelming of Vicksburg.• He expected Porter to run the ironclads past
Vicksburg to support his crossing with their heavy guns.
“ On the night of 16 Apr the Union fleet got underway. Flares and roaring bonfires lighted up the
Federal ships for the Confederate gunners,• and the vagaries of the current threw each of the larger
ships into at least one 360º turn while passing the city. Remarkably enough, not a single Union sailor
was killed and not one ironclad was critically damaged. Of the three supply-laden transports, one
was sunk. A few nights later additional supply ships ran past Vicksburg to join the Union forces.•
“When prolonged bombardment from the ironclads failed to knock out the batteries at Grand Gulf,
Grant and Porter shifted army and ships south and staged a practically unopposed landing at
Bruinsberg, six miles farther downstream.• At the same time, to divert Confederate attention,•
Sherman staged a mock landing near Haynes Bluff at the opposite end of the Confederate defenses
just above Vicksburg. Sherman put on such a realistic show that the Confederates thought that this
was the main thrust and Grant’s the diversionary move.
“Thus were initiated the most brilliant ops of Grant’s career….”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., pp. 304-305.
“…Grant’s career. By his success in moving his army to the E bank of the Mississippi he acquired
the initiative,…”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., pp. 304-305.
“…Grant’s career. By his success in moving his army to the E bank of the Mississippi he acquired
the initiative, and did not relinquish it until he had captured Vicksburg. Moving first on Port
Gibson, where the Bruinsberg-Vicksburg and Grand Gulf-Jackson roads converged, the Union
van defeated a small Confederate force and thereby made Grand Gulf untenable. When the Union
ships returned to Grand Gulf, they found it evacuated, and Grant’s army marched in from the E on 3
May….”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., pp. 304-305.
“…Grant’s career. By his success in moving his army to the E bank of the Mississippi he acquired
the initiative, and did not relinquish it until he had captured Vicksburg. Moving first on Port
Gibson, where the Bruinsberg-Vicksburg and Grand Gulf-Jackson roads converged, the Union
van defeated a small Confederate force and thereby made Grand Gulf untenable. When the Union
ships returned to Grand Gulf, they found it evacuated, and Grant’s army marched in from the E on 3
May.
“Grant had originally planned to move a part of his force S at this time, cooperating with Banks
against Port Hudson. But Banks was not ready. Although Grant’s army of 45,000 (including
Sherman’s men) was confronted with Confederate forces in MS numbering more than 65,000, Grant
elected to keep the offensive….”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., pp. 304-305.
“…Grant’s career. By his success in moving his army to the E bank of the Mississippi he acquired
the initiative, and did not relinquish it until he had captured Vicksburg. Moving first on Port
Gibson, where the Bruinsberg-Vicksburg and Grand Gulf-Jackson roads converged, the Union
van defeated a small Confederate force and thereby made Grand Gulf untenable. When the Union
ships returned to Grand Gulf, they found it evacuated, and Grant’s army marched in from the E on 3
May.
“Grant had originally planned to move a part of his force S at this time, cooperating with Banks
against Port Hudson. But Banks was not ready. Although Grant’s army of 45,000 (including
Sherman’s men) was confronted with Confederate forces in MS numbering more than 65,000, Grant
elected to keep the offensive. The essence of his strategy was to concentrate all his force against
segments of the enemy one at a time….”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 305.
“…a time.
“Pemberton with 45,000 men was in the Vicksburg perimeter. Johnston was assembling a force of
20,000 at Jackson….”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 305.
“…a time.
“Pemberton with 45,000 men was in the Vicksburg perimeter.• Johnston was assembling a force of
20,000 at Jackson. If Grant moved E against Johnston, Pemberton would sever his LOC from Grand
Gulf.….”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 305.
“…a time.
“Pemberton with 45,000 men was in the Vicksburg perimeter.• Johnston was assembling a force of
20,000 at Jackson. If Grant moved E against Johnston, Pemberton would sever his LOC from Grand
Gulf. On the other hand, if Grant moved N against Pemberton, Johnston could come in behind
him….”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 305.
“…a time.
“Pemberton with 45,000 men was in the
Vicksburg perimeter.• Johnston was
assembling a force of 20,000 at Jackson. If
Grant moved E against Johnston,
Pemberton would sever his LOC from
Grand Gulf. On the other hand, if Grant
moved N against Pemberton, Johnston
could come in behind him. But the Union
cavalry commander,• Col Benjamin H.
Grierson, had already been dispatched
on a 600-mile raid through MS: between
17 Apr and 2 May he had destroyed 60
miles of telegraph lines, cut three
railroads, and disrupted Johnston’s
communications from the N, E, and
S.•….”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 305.
“…a time.
“Pemberton with 45,000 men was in the Vicksburg perimeter.• Johnston was assembling a force of
20,000 at Jackson. If Grant moved E against Johnston, Pemberton would sever his LOC from Grand
Gulf. On the other hand, if Grant moved N against Pemberton, Johnston could come in behind him.
But the Union cavalry commander,• Col Benjamin H. Grierson, had already been dispatched on a
600-mile raid through MS: between 17 Apr and 2 May he had destroyed 60 miles of telegraph
lines, cut three railroads, and disrupted Johnston’s communications from the N, E, and S.
Disregarding the cautious advice of his principal subordinates, Grant cut loose from his base on
the river and marched on Jackson.
“Grant brushed aside a small Confederate force at Raymond,…”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 305.
“…a time.
“Pemberton with 45,000 men was in the Vicksburg perimeter.• Johnston was assembling a force of
20,000 at Jackson. If Grant moved E against Johnston, Pemberton would sever his LOC from Grand
Gulf. On the other hand, if Grant moved N against Pemberton, Johnston could come in behind him.
But the Union cavalry commander,• Col Benjamin H. Grierson, had already been dispatched on a
600-mile raid through MS: between 17 Apr and 2 May he had destroyed 60 miles of telegraph
lines, cut three railroads, and disrupted Johnston’s communications from the N, E, and S.
Disregarding the cautious advice of his principal subordinates, Grant cut loose from his base on
the river and marched on Jackson.
“Grant brushed aside a small Confederate force at Raymond,…”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 305.
“…a time.
“Pemberton with 45,000 men was in the Vicksburg perimeter.• Johnston was assembling a force of
20,000 at Jackson. If Grant moved E against Johnston, Pemberton would sever his LOC from Grand
Gulf. On the other hand, if Grant moved N against Pemberton, Johnston could come in behind him.
But the Union cavalry commander,• Col Benjamin H. Grierson, had already been dispatched on a
600-mile raid through MS: between 17 Apr and 2 May he had destroyed 60 miles of telegraph
lines, cut three railroads, and disrupted Johnston’s communications from the N, E, and S.
Disregarding the cautious advice of his principal subordinates, Grant cut loose from his base on
the river and marched on Jackson.
“Grant brushed aside a small Confederate force at Raymond, and struck directly at Johnston’s little
army at the state capital, driving the Confederates out. In the meantime Pemberton was expending
the energy of his troops in grim determination to cut the nonexistent LOC between Grant and the
Mississippi River.….”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Ibid.
“…Mississippi River. Johnston, vainly attempting to unite the divided Confederate forces, ordered
Pemberton to join him at Clinton,…”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Ibid.
“…Mississippi River. Johnston, vainly attempting to unite the divided Confederate forces, ordered
Pemberton to join him at Clinton, NW of Jackson. He was too late. Grant had already turned W
toward Vicksburg, and on 16 May intercepted and routed 18,000 of Pemberton’s troops at
Champion’s Hill….”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Ibid.
“…Mississippi River. Johnston, vainly attempting to unite the divided Confederate forces, ordered
Pemberton to join him at Clinton, NW of Jackson. He was too late. Grant had already turned W
toward Vicksburg, and on 16 May intercepted and routed 18,000 of Pemberton’s troops at
Champion’s Hill….”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Ibid.
“…Mississippi River. Johnston, vainly attempting to unite the divided Confederate forces, ordered
Pemberton to join him at Clinton, NW of Jackson. He was too late. Grant had already turned W
toward Vicksburg, and on 16 May intercepted and routed 18,000 of Pemberton’s troops at
Champion’s Hill. Continuing in hot pursuit, Grant on the following day brought to bay a 5,000-man
Confederate force, smashing it and capturing a third of the men. Johnston was by now frantically
ordering Pemberton to abandon Vicksburg….”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Ibid.
“…Mississippi River. Johnston, vainly attempting to unite the divided Confederate forces, ordered
Pemberton to join him at Clinton, NW of Jackson. He was too late. Grant had already turned W
toward Vicksburg, and on 16 May intercepted and routed 18,000 of Pemberton’s troops at
Champion’s Hill. Continuing in hot pursuit, Grant on the following day brought to bay a 5,000-man
Confederate force, smashing it and capturing a third of the men. Johnston was by now frantically
ordering Pemberton to abandon Vicksburg. But Sherman’s corps surged NW to engulf Haynes’ Bluff
from the rear, and compel the evacuation of all defenses along the Yazoo N of Vicksburg. Firing from
the gunboats on the river, the Union sailors watched Sherman’s cavalry chasing the enemy from
Chickasaw Bluffs, where his men had suffered defeat five months earlier. Pemberton and his
decimated army were surrounded in Vicksburg. Grant’s hungry men could once more be supplied
from the fleet….”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Ibid.
“…the fleet.
“With supporting fire from the
gunboats, Grant tried to storm
Vicksburg but was repulsed. The Union
force entrenched for a protracted
siege….”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
Ibid.
“…protracted siege. Time was on Grant’s side: a steady stream of reinforcements poured into his
camp; the steady bombardment from land artillery and the gunboats in the river was reducing
Vicksburg to rubble. Cut off from supplies the garrison was ultimately bound to be starved out.
“After six weeks of siege, the end came. On 4 Jul 63 Pemberton surrendered; his 37,000 men
marched out, stacked their arms, and departed on parole. Falling on the day following the defeat of
Lee’s army at Gettysburg, the capture of Vicksburg shares with it a climatic position in the history of
the Civil War.
“Grant gave generous credit to the Navy for its vital role in the campaign. For not only did the
Union ships maintain the Army’s single LOC—the Mississippi River between Cairo and
Vicksburg—at the end of which the army was suspended like a Federal bucket in a Confederate
well, but the Navy by its control of the river cut Pemberton off from reinforcement from, or
escape to, the W. Operating at once as mobile heavy artillery and troop ferries, the gunboats ranged
over the whole navigable waterway system in the theater of ops, destroying Confederate supplies,
supporting Union garrisons under attack, and cutting off all enemy water-borne traffic.•
“Meanwhile Farragut’s squadron had been performing similar services downstream….”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., pp. 305-306.
“…services downstream. Urged on and closely supported by the Admiral, Gen Banks began the
long-postponed offensive against Port Hudson in mid-May of 63. An assault on 27 May failed, and
the pattern of bombardment and siege began.…”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., pp. 305-306.
“…siege began. The Confederate garrison was
still holding out when news of the fall of
Vicksburg reached them, convincing them that
protracting the struggle no longer conferred a
military advantage. On 8 Jul they surrendered.…”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., pp. 305-306.
“…they surrendered.
“The river was clear at last to merchant shipping from the Northwest and Ohio Valley. The
Confederacy was split, in effect extending the ‘Anaconda’ from the Gulf to Cairo. The Union’s
right flank was secured from any major enfilading threat from the W. The sweeping right wing
offensive that was to carry Sherman’s troops through Atlanta to the sea to cut off the retreat of
Lee’s army in 1865 was now a strategic possibility.”
The Capture of Vicksburg
and Port Hudson
–Wikipedia
Despite his ultimate success in winning the war, historians have
often considered Vicksburg his finest campaign—imaginative,
audacious, relentless, and a masterpiece of maneuver warfare.
James M. McPherson • called Vicksburg "the most brilliant and
innovative campaign of the Civil War"; • T. Harry Williams
described it as "one of the classic campaigns of the Civil War and,
indeed, of military history"; and the U.S. Army Field Manual 100–5 •
(May 1986) called it "the most brilliant campaign ever fought on
American soil."
–Wikipedia
President Lincoln announced, "The Father of Waters again goes
unvexed to the sea.”*______
* Quoted in Ballard, Michael B., Vicksburg, The Campaign that Opened the Mississippi.Chapel Hill:
U of NC Press, 2004. p. 410.
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 306.
“After the fall of Vicksburg and Port
Hudson the next logical objective for joint
army-navy ops was certainly Mobile.• Both
Grant and Farragut favored an expedition
whereby the armies of • Banks and Grant,
with the support of Farragut’s squadron,
would invest the last remaining Confederate
port on the Gulf. The Gulf blockade would
thus be completed,• and the Union forces
could then advance N to trap the Confederate
army being driven down from central TN….”
The Red River Campaign
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 306.
“…central TN. But instead Grant was obliged to give his personal direction to the fighting at
Chattanooga, and Banks became involved in strategic eccentric ops in TX.
“Although from a purely military point of view campaigning W of the Mississippi was a
needless dissipation of Union forces, there were reasons for it. The war was being fought to
restore the authority of the Federal government; hence it was going to be necessary ultimately to
occupy all Confederate territory. Furthermore, military success in TX could cut off the traffic in
foreign goods that reached the Confederacy via Mexico. The Union government was also
aroused by the implications of French activity S of the border….”
The Red River Campaign
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 306.
“…the border. Napoleon III had permitted
the use of French troops to support the
Archduke Maximillian’s intervention in
Mexican affairs.• It was believed that the
French emperor favored an independent
buffer state between Mexico and the US. If
the Confederacy could not maintain its
independence, then perhaps TX could be
reconstituted an independent republic….”
The Red River Campaign
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 306.
“…independent republic. Successful Union occupation of positions in TX might forestall serious
post-war difficulties. Halleck accordingly ordered Banks to try. Banks’ first effort was a badly
executed amphib attempt against Sabine on the LA-TX border. This was an ignominious
failure….”
The Red River Campaign
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 306.
“…independent republic. Successful Union occupation of positions in TX might forestall serious
post-war difficulties. Halleck accordingly ordered Banks to try. Banks’ first effort was a badly
executed amphib attempt against Sabine on the LA-TX border. This was an ignominious failure.
Next, Banks with naval support occupied Brazos Island at the mouth of the Rio Grande and
moved inland to capture Brownsville. The expedition then leapfrogged back up the coast with
various minor triumphs until it reached Galveston When Banks requested additional forces to
reduce the Confederate forces there, Halleck demurred….”
The Red River Campaign
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 306.
“…independent republic. Successful Union occupation of positions in TX might forestall serious
post-war difficulties. Halleck accordingly ordered Banks to try. Banks’ first effort was a badly
executed amphib attempt against Sabine on the LA-TX border. This was an ignominious failure.
Next, Banks with naval support occupied Brazos Island at the mouth of the Rio Grande and
moved inland to capture Brownsville. The expedition then leapfrogged back up the coast with
various minor triumphs until it reached Galveston When Banks requested additional forces to
reduce the Confederate forces there, Halleck demurred.
“For some time Northern cotton manufacturers had been exerting heavy pressure on the
Union government to make it possible to obtain a greater supply of Southern cotton. Thousands
of bales might be procured in the valley of the Red River,•which was navigable from the
Mississippi NW across LA to Shreveport—in an area where there were reputedly many
Northern sympathizers. Halleck suggested that Banks abandon the Galveston op and make
Shreveport the primary military objective of a campaign up the Red River….”
The Red River Campaign
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., p. 306.
“…independent republic. Successful Union occupation of positions in TX might forestall serious
post-war difficulties. Halleck accordingly ordered Banks to try. Banks’ first effort was a badly
executed amphib attempt against Sabine on the LA-TX border. This was an ignominious failure.
Next, Banks with naval support occupied Brazos Island at the mouth of the Rio Grande and
moved inland to capture Brownsville. The expedition then leapfrogged back up the coast with
various minor triumphs until it reached Galveston When Banks requested additional forces to
reduce the Confederate forces there, Halleck demurred.
“For some time Northern cotton manufacturers had been exerting heavy pressure on the
Union government to make it possible to obtain a greater supply of Southern cotton. Thousands
of bales might be procured in the valley of the Red River,•which was navigable from the
Mississippi NW across LA to Shreveport—in an area where there were reputedly many
Northern sympathizers. Halleck suggested that Banks abandon the Galveston op and make
Shreveport the primary military objective of a campaign up the Red River….”
The Red River Campaign
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., pp. 306-307.
“…Red River. If Banks cared to enter TX via
Shreveport, he could have the support of •
MGen Frederick Steele’s AR army and the loan
of a detachment from • Sherman’s force to
assist him.….”
The Red River Campaign
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., pp. 306-307.
“…Red River. If Banks cared to enter TX via Shreveport, he could have the support of • MGen
Frederick Steele’s AR army and the loan of a detachment from • Sherman’s force to assist him.
So the new year found Banks back in NO, where he was as much occupied by making
arrangements for the inauguration of civil government in LA in Mar as by planning the Red
River campaign….”
The Red River Campaign
16:
The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II:
Vicksburg and After
op. cit., pp. 306-307.
“… Mar as by planning the Red River
campaign.
“Banks’ army was to march overland to
rendezvous at Alexandria, LA on 17 Mar 64
with Sherman’s 10,000 men under • BGen
A.J. Smith, who would come up the Red
river with • Porter and the gunboats….”
The Red River Campaign
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg
Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg

Contenu connexe

Tendances

How The Americas Change
How The Americas ChangeHow The Americas Change
How The Americas ChangeTricia Fonseca
 
Vietnam War sniper program sample
Vietnam War sniper program sampleVietnam War sniper program sample
Vietnam War sniper program sampleAlexander Kupka
 
Civil war national and ga - 2013
Civil war national and ga - 2013Civil war national and ga - 2013
Civil war national and ga - 2013dstnrainey
 
15th Army Air Corps in WWII-Mansions of the Lord & Destination~Vienna-origina...
15th Army Air Corps in WWII-Mansions of the Lord & Destination~Vienna-origina...15th Army Air Corps in WWII-Mansions of the Lord & Destination~Vienna-origina...
15th Army Air Corps in WWII-Mansions of the Lord & Destination~Vienna-origina...Kevin Edwards
 
glenn miller-army air corps-world war II-Destination~Vienna-original version
glenn miller-army air corps-world war II-Destination~Vienna-original versionglenn miller-army air corps-world war II-Destination~Vienna-original version
glenn miller-army air corps-world war II-Destination~Vienna-original versionKevin Edwards
 
Lesson 15 the us navy, vietnam, and limited war, 1964 1975
Lesson 15 the us navy, vietnam, and limited war, 1964 1975Lesson 15 the us navy, vietnam, and limited war, 1964 1975
Lesson 15 the us navy, vietnam, and limited war, 1964 1975Brad
 
Sp 3.2 session 9 u boats
Sp 3.2 session 9 u boats Sp 3.2 session 9 u boats
Sp 3.2 session 9 u boats Jim Powers
 
Glenn Miller Army Air Force in WWII-Destination~Vienna by Kevin W. Edwards
Glenn Miller Army Air Force in WWII-Destination~Vienna by Kevin W. EdwardsGlenn Miller Army Air Force in WWII-Destination~Vienna by Kevin W. Edwards
Glenn Miller Army Air Force in WWII-Destination~Vienna by Kevin W. EdwardsKevin Edwards
 
Vietnam Good Best
Vietnam Good BestVietnam Good Best
Vietnam Good Bestsmith
 
15th Army Air Corps in WW II-Slide show destination~vienna-original versi…
15th Army Air Corps in WW II-Slide show destination~vienna-original versi…15th Army Air Corps in WW II-Slide show destination~vienna-original versi…
15th Army Air Corps in WW II-Slide show destination~vienna-original versi…Kevin Edwards
 
Sp 3.2 session 6 opening operations
Sp 3.2 session 6 opening operationsSp 3.2 session 6 opening operations
Sp 3.2 session 6 opening operationsJim Powers
 
Sp 3 sess. 4 usn transition
Sp 3 sess. 4 usn transitionSp 3 sess. 4 usn transition
Sp 3 sess. 4 usn transitionJim Powers
 
The War of 1812 and its Affects
The War of 1812 and its AffectsThe War of 1812 and its Affects
The War of 1812 and its AffectsMegaMannyJ
 
Topic.15 The Cold War And The America That Dealt With It
Topic.15 The Cold War And The America That Dealt With ItTopic.15 The Cold War And The America That Dealt With It
Topic.15 The Cold War And The America That Dealt With Itmr.meechin
 
WWII The Home Front
WWII The Home FrontWWII The Home Front
WWII The Home FrontKim Drugan
 
Sea Power 3; session 2; 1812
Sea Power 3; session 2; 1812Sea Power 3; session 2; 1812
Sea Power 3; session 2; 1812Jim Powers
 

Tendances (20)

How The Americas Change
How The Americas ChangeHow The Americas Change
How The Americas Change
 
Vietnam War sniper program sample
Vietnam War sniper program sampleVietnam War sniper program sample
Vietnam War sniper program sample
 
Vus11
Vus11Vus11
Vus11
 
Civil war national and ga - 2013
Civil war national and ga - 2013Civil war national and ga - 2013
Civil war national and ga - 2013
 
15th Army Air Corps in WWII-Mansions of the Lord & Destination~Vienna-origina...
15th Army Air Corps in WWII-Mansions of the Lord & Destination~Vienna-origina...15th Army Air Corps in WWII-Mansions of the Lord & Destination~Vienna-origina...
15th Army Air Corps in WWII-Mansions of the Lord & Destination~Vienna-origina...
 
glenn miller-army air corps-world war II-Destination~Vienna-original version
glenn miller-army air corps-world war II-Destination~Vienna-original versionglenn miller-army air corps-world war II-Destination~Vienna-original version
glenn miller-army air corps-world war II-Destination~Vienna-original version
 
Civil war
Civil warCivil war
Civil war
 
Lesson 15 the us navy, vietnam, and limited war, 1964 1975
Lesson 15 the us navy, vietnam, and limited war, 1964 1975Lesson 15 the us navy, vietnam, and limited war, 1964 1975
Lesson 15 the us navy, vietnam, and limited war, 1964 1975
 
Sp 3.2 session 9 u boats
Sp 3.2 session 9 u boats Sp 3.2 session 9 u boats
Sp 3.2 session 9 u boats
 
Glenn Miller Army Air Force in WWII-Destination~Vienna by Kevin W. Edwards
Glenn Miller Army Air Force in WWII-Destination~Vienna by Kevin W. EdwardsGlenn Miller Army Air Force in WWII-Destination~Vienna by Kevin W. Edwards
Glenn Miller Army Air Force in WWII-Destination~Vienna by Kevin W. Edwards
 
Vietnam Good Best
Vietnam Good BestVietnam Good Best
Vietnam Good Best
 
Thfk tent revival_talk_2015
Thfk tent revival_talk_2015Thfk tent revival_talk_2015
Thfk tent revival_talk_2015
 
15th Army Air Corps in WW II-Slide show destination~vienna-original versi…
15th Army Air Corps in WW II-Slide show destination~vienna-original versi…15th Army Air Corps in WW II-Slide show destination~vienna-original versi…
15th Army Air Corps in WW II-Slide show destination~vienna-original versi…
 
Sp 3.2 session 6 opening operations
Sp 3.2 session 6 opening operationsSp 3.2 session 6 opening operations
Sp 3.2 session 6 opening operations
 
Sp 3 sess. 4 usn transition
Sp 3 sess. 4 usn transitionSp 3 sess. 4 usn transition
Sp 3 sess. 4 usn transition
 
The War of 1812 and its Affects
The War of 1812 and its AffectsThe War of 1812 and its Affects
The War of 1812 and its Affects
 
Topic.15 The Cold War And The America That Dealt With It
Topic.15 The Cold War And The America That Dealt With ItTopic.15 The Cold War And The America That Dealt With It
Topic.15 The Cold War And The America That Dealt With It
 
WWII The Home Front
WWII The Home FrontWWII The Home Front
WWII The Home Front
 
Sea Power 3; session 2; 1812
Sea Power 3; session 2; 1812Sea Power 3; session 2; 1812
Sea Power 3; session 2; 1812
 
17 wwii 2 3day
17 wwii 2 3day17 wwii 2 3day
17 wwii 2 3day
 

En vedette

Rivers & Environments
Rivers & EnvironmentsRivers & Environments
Rivers & EnvironmentsSadman Ridoy
 
QM-057-品質顧問生涯經驗分享
QM-057-品質顧問生涯經驗分享QM-057-品質顧問生涯經驗分享
QM-057-品質顧問生涯經驗分享handbook
 
Introduction to geography
Introduction to geographyIntroduction to geography
Introduction to geographyMuhammad ahmed
 
Real World Use Cases: Hadoop and NoSQL in Production
Real World Use Cases: Hadoop and NoSQL in ProductionReal World Use Cases: Hadoop and NoSQL in Production
Real World Use Cases: Hadoop and NoSQL in ProductionCodemotion
 
"THE IMPACT OF RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS ON THE MUSIC INDUSTRY: THE CA...
"THE IMPACT OF RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS ON THE MUSIC INDUSTRY: THE CA..."THE IMPACT OF RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS ON THE MUSIC INDUSTRY: THE CA...
"THE IMPACT OF RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS ON THE MUSIC INDUSTRY: THE CA...Peter Fountoukidis
 
Let's tests! Prezentacja Moniki Braun w trakcie warsztatów "Let's go to IT"
Let's tests! Prezentacja Moniki Braun w trakcie warsztatów "Let's go to IT"Let's tests! Prezentacja Moniki Braun w trakcie warsztatów "Let's go to IT"
Let's tests! Prezentacja Moniki Braun w trakcie warsztatów "Let's go to IT"mamopracuj
 
earthquake tornado and volcano
earthquake tornado and volcanoearthquake tornado and volcano
earthquake tornado and volcanoroushanhari
 
JPoint 2016 - Etudes of DIY Java profiler
JPoint 2016 - Etudes of DIY Java profilerJPoint 2016 - Etudes of DIY Java profiler
JPoint 2016 - Etudes of DIY Java profilerAnton Arhipov
 
Hadoop World 2011: The Hadoop Stack - Then, Now and in the Future - Eli Colli...
Hadoop World 2011: The Hadoop Stack - Then, Now and in the Future - Eli Colli...Hadoop World 2011: The Hadoop Stack - Then, Now and in the Future - Eli Colli...
Hadoop World 2011: The Hadoop Stack - Then, Now and in the Future - Eli Colli...Cloudera, Inc.
 

En vedette (17)

Treaty of Neuilly
Treaty of NeuillyTreaty of Neuilly
Treaty of Neuilly
 
Kennisdeling via google apps
Kennisdeling via google appsKennisdeling via google apps
Kennisdeling via google apps
 
Sébastien Soyez
Sébastien Soyez Sébastien Soyez
Sébastien Soyez
 
Rivers & Environments
Rivers & EnvironmentsRivers & Environments
Rivers & Environments
 
Verzamelen of verliezen: deponeren van digitale publicaties?
Verzamelen of verliezen: deponeren van digitale publicaties?Verzamelen of verliezen: deponeren van digitale publicaties?
Verzamelen of verliezen: deponeren van digitale publicaties?
 
Presentación1
Presentación1Presentación1
Presentación1
 
How B2B Completes ERP
How B2B Completes ERPHow B2B Completes ERP
How B2B Completes ERP
 
QM-057-品質顧問生涯經驗分享
QM-057-品質顧問生涯經驗分享QM-057-品質顧問生涯經驗分享
QM-057-品質顧問生涯經驗分享
 
Introduction to geography
Introduction to geographyIntroduction to geography
Introduction to geography
 
Real World Use Cases: Hadoop and NoSQL in Production
Real World Use Cases: Hadoop and NoSQL in ProductionReal World Use Cases: Hadoop and NoSQL in Production
Real World Use Cases: Hadoop and NoSQL in Production
 
"THE IMPACT OF RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS ON THE MUSIC INDUSTRY: THE CA...
"THE IMPACT OF RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS ON THE MUSIC INDUSTRY: THE CA..."THE IMPACT OF RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS ON THE MUSIC INDUSTRY: THE CA...
"THE IMPACT OF RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS ON THE MUSIC INDUSTRY: THE CA...
 
KCGG UGent - Nele Pauwels
KCGG UGent - Nele PauwelsKCGG UGent - Nele Pauwels
KCGG UGent - Nele Pauwels
 
Let's tests! Prezentacja Moniki Braun w trakcie warsztatów "Let's go to IT"
Let's tests! Prezentacja Moniki Braun w trakcie warsztatów "Let's go to IT"Let's tests! Prezentacja Moniki Braun w trakcie warsztatów "Let's go to IT"
Let's tests! Prezentacja Moniki Braun w trakcie warsztatów "Let's go to IT"
 
Danish Library Association - voorstelling door Hellen Niegaard
Danish Library Association - voorstelling door Hellen NiegaardDanish Library Association - voorstelling door Hellen Niegaard
Danish Library Association - voorstelling door Hellen Niegaard
 
earthquake tornado and volcano
earthquake tornado and volcanoearthquake tornado and volcano
earthquake tornado and volcano
 
JPoint 2016 - Etudes of DIY Java profiler
JPoint 2016 - Etudes of DIY Java profilerJPoint 2016 - Etudes of DIY Java profiler
JPoint 2016 - Etudes of DIY Java profiler
 
Hadoop World 2011: The Hadoop Stack - Then, Now and in the Future - Eli Colli...
Hadoop World 2011: The Hadoop Stack - Then, Now and in the Future - Eli Colli...Hadoop World 2011: The Hadoop Stack - Then, Now and in the Future - Eli Colli...
Hadoop World 2011: The Hadoop Stack - Then, Now and in the Future - Eli Colli...
 

Similaire à Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg

Chapter 6 mississippi studies 10 6-14
Chapter 6 mississippi studies 10 6-14Chapter 6 mississippi studies 10 6-14
Chapter 6 mississippi studies 10 6-14Allison Barnette
 
Sp 3 sess. 7 civil war 3
Sp 3 sess. 7 civil war 3Sp 3 sess. 7 civil war 3
Sp 3 sess. 7 civil war 3Jim Powers
 
Civil War part two
Civil War part twoCivil War part two
Civil War part twocapjjj
 
LOAPUSH ch 21
LOAPUSH ch 21LOAPUSH ch 21
LOAPUSH ch 21LOAPUSH
 
A difficult past
A difficult pastA difficult past
A difficult pastcgrace88
 
Ch.1 The civil war
Ch.1  The civil warCh.1  The civil war
Ch.1 The civil wardhtaylor3
 
Chapter 6 mississippi studies
Chapter 6 mississippi studiesChapter 6 mississippi studies
Chapter 6 mississippi studiesAllison Barnette
 
Civil War a Survey
Civil War a SurveyCivil War a Survey
Civil War a SurveyMrs. Sharbs
 
Civil war and reconstruction spring 2014 pp
Civil war and reconstruction spring 2014 ppCivil war and reconstruction spring 2014 pp
Civil war and reconstruction spring 2014 ppAndy Ligeti
 
Major battles of the American Civil War
Major battles of the American Civil WarMajor battles of the American Civil War
Major battles of the American Civil WarCindiBishop
 
Summary of the civilwar
Summary of the civilwarSummary of the civilwar
Summary of the civilwarmontyhartfield
 
How the americas change the long 19th century
How the americas change the long 19th centuryHow the americas change the long 19th century
How the americas change the long 19th centurychantelh1990
 
Hist 141 how the america's changed
Hist 141   how the america's changedHist 141   how the america's changed
Hist 141 how the america's changedgnsmann
 
YANKEE SCOUT -- Yorktown !!
YANKEE SCOUT -- Yorktown !!YANKEE SCOUT -- Yorktown !!
YANKEE SCOUT -- Yorktown !!Roch Steinbach
 

Similaire à Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg (20)

Chapter 6 mississippi studies 10 6-14
Chapter 6 mississippi studies 10 6-14Chapter 6 mississippi studies 10 6-14
Chapter 6 mississippi studies 10 6-14
 
Sp 3 sess. 7 civil war 3
Sp 3 sess. 7 civil war 3Sp 3 sess. 7 civil war 3
Sp 3 sess. 7 civil war 3
 
Civil War Presentation
Civil War PresentationCivil War Presentation
Civil War Presentation
 
Civil War part two
Civil War part twoCivil War part two
Civil War part two
 
38 The Civil War (II)
38 The Civil War (II)38 The Civil War (II)
38 The Civil War (II)
 
LOAPUSH ch 21
LOAPUSH ch 21LOAPUSH ch 21
LOAPUSH ch 21
 
A difficult past
A difficult pastA difficult past
A difficult past
 
Ch.1 The civil war
Ch.1  The civil warCh.1  The civil war
Ch.1 The civil war
 
How the americas change
How the americas changeHow the americas change
How the americas change
 
Chapter 6 mississippi studies
Chapter 6 mississippi studiesChapter 6 mississippi studies
Chapter 6 mississippi studies
 
Civil War a Survey
Civil War a SurveyCivil War a Survey
Civil War a Survey
 
Civil war and reconstruction spring 2014 pp
Civil war and reconstruction spring 2014 ppCivil war and reconstruction spring 2014 pp
Civil war and reconstruction spring 2014 pp
 
Secession and civil war ppt
Secession and civil war pptSecession and civil war ppt
Secession and civil war ppt
 
39 The Civil War (III)
39 The Civil War (III)39 The Civil War (III)
39 The Civil War (III)
 
Major battles of the American Civil War
Major battles of the American Civil WarMajor battles of the American Civil War
Major battles of the American Civil War
 
Summary of the civilwar
Summary of the civilwarSummary of the civilwar
Summary of the civilwar
 
Civil War
Civil WarCivil War
Civil War
 
How the americas change the long 19th century
How the americas change the long 19th centuryHow the americas change the long 19th century
How the americas change the long 19th century
 
Hist 141 how the america's changed
Hist 141   how the america's changedHist 141   how the america's changed
Hist 141 how the america's changed
 
YANKEE SCOUT -- Yorktown !!
YANKEE SCOUT -- Yorktown !!YANKEE SCOUT -- Yorktown !!
YANKEE SCOUT -- Yorktown !!
 

Plus de Jim Powers

19 c Europe, Part 1, 1815-1848; General Observations
19 c Europe, Part 1, 1815-1848; General Observations19 c Europe, Part 1, 1815-1848; General Observations
19 c Europe, Part 1, 1815-1848; General ObservationsJim Powers
 
19 c Europe, session 1; The Great Powers and the Balance of Power, 1815 1848
19 c Europe, session 1; The Great Powers and the Balance of Power, 1815 184819 c Europe, session 1; The Great Powers and the Balance of Power, 1815 1848
19 c Europe, session 1; The Great Powers and the Balance of Power, 1815 1848Jim Powers
 
19 c Europe, Part 1, session 2; The Eastern Powers: Absolutism and its Limita...
19 c Europe, Part 1, session 2; The Eastern Powers: Absolutism and its Limita...19 c Europe, Part 1, session 2; The Eastern Powers: Absolutism and its Limita...
19 c Europe, Part 1, session 2; The Eastern Powers: Absolutism and its Limita...Jim Powers
 
19 c Europe, part 1, session 3; France: The Restoration and the July Monarchy
19 c Europe, part 1, session 3; France: The Restoration and the July Monarchy19 c Europe, part 1, session 3; France: The Restoration and the July Monarchy
19 c Europe, part 1, session 3; France: The Restoration and the July MonarchyJim Powers
 
19 c Europe, session 4; great britain: social unrest and social compromise
19 c Europe, session 4; great britain: social unrest and social compromise19 c Europe, session 4; great britain: social unrest and social compromise
19 c Europe, session 4; great britain: social unrest and social compromiseJim Powers
 
19 c Europe 1, session 5; Revolutions of 1848
19 c Europe 1, session 5; Revolutions of 184819 c Europe 1, session 5; Revolutions of 1848
19 c Europe 1, session 5; Revolutions of 1848Jim Powers
 
19 c Europe, Part 2, 1850-1871; General Observations
19 c Europe, Part 2, 1850-1871;  General Observations19 c Europe, Part 2, 1850-1871;  General Observations
19 c Europe, Part 2, 1850-1871; General ObservationsJim Powers
 
19 c Europe, session 2.6; The breakdown of the concert and the crimean war
19 c Europe, session 2.6; The breakdown of the concert  and the crimean war19 c Europe, session 2.6; The breakdown of the concert  and the crimean war
19 c Europe, session 2.6; The breakdown of the concert and the crimean warJim Powers
 
19 c Europe, session 2.7; France: The Second Empire
19 c Europe, session 2.7; France: The Second Empire19 c Europe, session 2.7; France: The Second Empire
19 c Europe, session 2.7; France: The Second EmpireJim Powers
 
19 c Europe, session 2.8; The Unification of Italy
19 c Europe, session 2.8; The Unification of Italy19 c Europe, session 2.8; The Unification of Italy
19 c Europe, session 2.8; The Unification of ItalyJim Powers
 
19 c Europe, session 2.9; The German Question, 1850-66
19 c Europe, session 2.9; The German Question, 1850-6619 c Europe, session 2.9; The German Question, 1850-66
19 c Europe, session 2.9; The German Question, 1850-66Jim Powers
 
19 c Europe, session 2.10; The Reorganization of Europe, 1866-1871
19 c Europe, session 2.10; The Reorganization of Europe, 1866-187119 c Europe, session 2.10; The Reorganization of Europe, 1866-1871
19 c Europe, session 2.10; The Reorganization of Europe, 1866-1871Jim Powers
 
19 c Europe, Part 3; General Observations
19 c Europe, Part 3;  General Observations19 c Europe, Part 3;  General Observations
19 c Europe, Part 3; General ObservationsJim Powers
 
19 c Europe, session 3.11; Great Powers and the Balance of Power; 1871-1890
19 c Europe, session 3.11; Great Powers and the Balance of Power; 1871-189019 c Europe, session 3.11; Great Powers and the Balance of Power; 1871-1890
19 c Europe, session 3.11; Great Powers and the Balance of Power; 1871-1890Jim Powers
 
19 c Europe, session 3.12; capitalism and socialism
19 c Europe, session 3.12; capitalism and socialism 19 c Europe, session 3.12; capitalism and socialism
19 c Europe, session 3.12; capitalism and socialism Jim Powers
 
19 c Europe, session 3.13; from liberalism to democracy: political progress ...
19 c Europe, session 3.13; from  liberalism to democracy: political progress ...19 c Europe, session 3.13; from  liberalism to democracy: political progress ...
19 c Europe, session 3.13; from liberalism to democracy: political progress ...Jim Powers
 
19 c europe, session.3.14; third french republic
19 c europe, session.3.14; third french republic 19 c europe, session.3.14; third french republic
19 c europe, session.3.14; third french republic Jim Powers
 
19 c Europe, session 3.15; The Second Reich
19 c Europe, session 3.15; The Second Reich19 c Europe, session 3.15; The Second Reich
19 c Europe, session 3.15; The Second ReichJim Powers
 
19 c Europe, session 3.16; Austria-Hungary, the Balkans and Turkey
19 c Europe, session 3.16; Austria-Hungary, the Balkans and Turkey19 c Europe, session 3.16; Austria-Hungary, the Balkans and Turkey
19 c Europe, session 3.16; Austria-Hungary, the Balkans and TurkeyJim Powers
 
19 c Europe, session 3.17 Russia
19 c Europe, session 3.17 Russia19 c Europe, session 3.17 Russia
19 c Europe, session 3.17 RussiaJim Powers
 

Plus de Jim Powers (20)

19 c Europe, Part 1, 1815-1848; General Observations
19 c Europe, Part 1, 1815-1848; General Observations19 c Europe, Part 1, 1815-1848; General Observations
19 c Europe, Part 1, 1815-1848; General Observations
 
19 c Europe, session 1; The Great Powers and the Balance of Power, 1815 1848
19 c Europe, session 1; The Great Powers and the Balance of Power, 1815 184819 c Europe, session 1; The Great Powers and the Balance of Power, 1815 1848
19 c Europe, session 1; The Great Powers and the Balance of Power, 1815 1848
 
19 c Europe, Part 1, session 2; The Eastern Powers: Absolutism and its Limita...
19 c Europe, Part 1, session 2; The Eastern Powers: Absolutism and its Limita...19 c Europe, Part 1, session 2; The Eastern Powers: Absolutism and its Limita...
19 c Europe, Part 1, session 2; The Eastern Powers: Absolutism and its Limita...
 
19 c Europe, part 1, session 3; France: The Restoration and the July Monarchy
19 c Europe, part 1, session 3; France: The Restoration and the July Monarchy19 c Europe, part 1, session 3; France: The Restoration and the July Monarchy
19 c Europe, part 1, session 3; France: The Restoration and the July Monarchy
 
19 c Europe, session 4; great britain: social unrest and social compromise
19 c Europe, session 4; great britain: social unrest and social compromise19 c Europe, session 4; great britain: social unrest and social compromise
19 c Europe, session 4; great britain: social unrest and social compromise
 
19 c Europe 1, session 5; Revolutions of 1848
19 c Europe 1, session 5; Revolutions of 184819 c Europe 1, session 5; Revolutions of 1848
19 c Europe 1, session 5; Revolutions of 1848
 
19 c Europe, Part 2, 1850-1871; General Observations
19 c Europe, Part 2, 1850-1871;  General Observations19 c Europe, Part 2, 1850-1871;  General Observations
19 c Europe, Part 2, 1850-1871; General Observations
 
19 c Europe, session 2.6; The breakdown of the concert and the crimean war
19 c Europe, session 2.6; The breakdown of the concert  and the crimean war19 c Europe, session 2.6; The breakdown of the concert  and the crimean war
19 c Europe, session 2.6; The breakdown of the concert and the crimean war
 
19 c Europe, session 2.7; France: The Second Empire
19 c Europe, session 2.7; France: The Second Empire19 c Europe, session 2.7; France: The Second Empire
19 c Europe, session 2.7; France: The Second Empire
 
19 c Europe, session 2.8; The Unification of Italy
19 c Europe, session 2.8; The Unification of Italy19 c Europe, session 2.8; The Unification of Italy
19 c Europe, session 2.8; The Unification of Italy
 
19 c Europe, session 2.9; The German Question, 1850-66
19 c Europe, session 2.9; The German Question, 1850-6619 c Europe, session 2.9; The German Question, 1850-66
19 c Europe, session 2.9; The German Question, 1850-66
 
19 c Europe, session 2.10; The Reorganization of Europe, 1866-1871
19 c Europe, session 2.10; The Reorganization of Europe, 1866-187119 c Europe, session 2.10; The Reorganization of Europe, 1866-1871
19 c Europe, session 2.10; The Reorganization of Europe, 1866-1871
 
19 c Europe, Part 3; General Observations
19 c Europe, Part 3;  General Observations19 c Europe, Part 3;  General Observations
19 c Europe, Part 3; General Observations
 
19 c Europe, session 3.11; Great Powers and the Balance of Power; 1871-1890
19 c Europe, session 3.11; Great Powers and the Balance of Power; 1871-189019 c Europe, session 3.11; Great Powers and the Balance of Power; 1871-1890
19 c Europe, session 3.11; Great Powers and the Balance of Power; 1871-1890
 
19 c Europe, session 3.12; capitalism and socialism
19 c Europe, session 3.12; capitalism and socialism 19 c Europe, session 3.12; capitalism and socialism
19 c Europe, session 3.12; capitalism and socialism
 
19 c Europe, session 3.13; from liberalism to democracy: political progress ...
19 c Europe, session 3.13; from  liberalism to democracy: political progress ...19 c Europe, session 3.13; from  liberalism to democracy: political progress ...
19 c Europe, session 3.13; from liberalism to democracy: political progress ...
 
19 c europe, session.3.14; third french republic
19 c europe, session.3.14; third french republic 19 c europe, session.3.14; third french republic
19 c europe, session.3.14; third french republic
 
19 c Europe, session 3.15; The Second Reich
19 c Europe, session 3.15; The Second Reich19 c Europe, session 3.15; The Second Reich
19 c Europe, session 3.15; The Second Reich
 
19 c Europe, session 3.16; Austria-Hungary, the Balkans and Turkey
19 c Europe, session 3.16; Austria-Hungary, the Balkans and Turkey19 c Europe, session 3.16; Austria-Hungary, the Balkans and Turkey
19 c Europe, session 3.16; Austria-Hungary, the Balkans and Turkey
 
19 c Europe, session 3.17 Russia
19 c Europe, session 3.17 Russia19 c Europe, session 3.17 Russia
19 c Europe, session 3.17 Russia
 

Dernier

TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfagholdier
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsTechSoup
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionMaksud Ahmed
 
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-IIFood Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-IIShubhangi Sonawane
 
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdfMicro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdfPoh-Sun Goh
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhikauryashika82
 
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan FellowsOn National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan FellowsMebane Rash
 
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.MaryamAhmad92
 
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural Resources
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural ResourcesEnergy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural Resources
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural ResourcesShubhangi Sonawane
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...christianmathematics
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfciinovamais
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxheathfieldcps1
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdfQucHHunhnh
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxDenish Jangid
 
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptxRole Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptxNikitaBankoti2
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104misteraugie
 
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfMaking and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfChris Hunter
 
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning ExhibitSociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibitjbellavia9
 

Dernier (20)

TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-IIFood Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
 
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdfMicro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
 
Asian American Pacific Islander Month DDSD 2024.pptx
Asian American Pacific Islander Month DDSD 2024.pptxAsian American Pacific Islander Month DDSD 2024.pptx
Asian American Pacific Islander Month DDSD 2024.pptx
 
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan FellowsOn National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
 
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
 
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural Resources
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural ResourcesEnergy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural Resources
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural Resources
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptxRole Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
 
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfMaking and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
 
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning ExhibitSociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
 

Sp 3 sess. 8 civil war 4 vicksburg

  • 1. Ex Scientia Tridens American Sea Power Unprecedented Global Reach
  • 2. session vii American Civil War, 1861-1865 Part 4; The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After
  • 3.
  • 4. “BY MIDSUMMER [1862] the whole of the Mississippi apart from a short stretch on the lower reaches was in Union hands. Communications between the eastern and western Confederacy were all but severed, and with the capture of Norfolk and New Orleans the rebels had lost their major shipbuilding centers.… “The following summer, 1863, Union forces took the last remaining strongholds on the Mississippi, cutting the agricultural western states of the Confederacy completely from the eastern states.…” Peter Padfield, Maritime Dominion and the Triumph of the Free World; Naval Campaigns that Shaped the Modern World, 1852-2001. pp. 41-42. 4 The American Civil War, 1861
  • 5. “…shipbuilding centers.… “The following summer, 1863, Union forces took the last remaining strongholds on the Mississippi, cutting the agricultural western states of the Confederacy completely from the eastern states.• Simultaneously Lee’s tactical touch deserted him. Advancing against the center of the Union Army of the Potomac outside Gettysburg, his men suffered terrible losses, and he was forced to retire into Virginia.• “The twin defeats east and west [coming within a day of one another] ended any possibility of military victory for the Confederacy…” Peter Padfield, Maritime Dominion and the Triumph of the Free World; Naval Campaigns that Shaped the Modern World, 1852-2001. pp. 41-42. 4 The American Civil War, 1861
  • 6. “…the Confederacy. For the Union the war aims were defined by Lincoln when he came to dedicate the military cemetery at Gettysburg four months later. Far wider than either reunification or the abolition of slavery, they were nothing less than the survival of the American model of democracy.…” Padfield, p. 42. 4 The American Civil War, 1861
  • 7. “…of democracy: “These simple phrases would achieve immortality and provide a beacon for future generations of Americans.…” Padfield, p. 42. 4 The American Civil War, 1861 Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate, we can not consecrate, we can not hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.•
  • 8. Major Topics I. From New Orleans to Vicksburg II. Failure of the First Attack III. Winter Campaign IV. Vicksburg, Port Hudson, and the Red River Campaign
  • 10. From New Orleans to Vicksburg The Battle of Memphis, 6 Jun 62.”It resulted in a crushing defeat for the Confederate forces, and marked the virtual eradication of a Confederate naval presence on the river.”—Wikipedia “The Battle of the Rams.” by A.R. Ward, 1862.
  • 11. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Potter & Nimitz, eds., Sea Power, p. 293. “The Confederate plan to hold a second line of defense between Memphis and Chattanooga • along the Memphis and Charleston railroad—the only direct rail connection between the Mississippi River and the Atlantic coast—was born of necessity out of the Fort Donelson disaster. Neither the Battle of Shiloh nor the Union occupation of New Orleans had altered the basic strategic pattern. The Federal campaign against the rail junction of Corinth • was renewed under the direct command of Gen Halleck • who, dismayed by the fearful bloodletting at Shiloh, felt bound to use his armies with caution. Only after assembling 100,000 men did he resume the advance. Confederate Gen Beauregard • had no more than 50,000 troops with which to delay the Union forces. He had to save his army while the Confederacy rallied its full strength—even at the cost of abandoning Corinth. Brilliantly impeding Halleck by every means short of a major battle, Beauregard capitalized on Halleck’s caution to prolong the 20-mile advance for a whole month. When the Federal soldiers finally entered Corinth on 29 Mar 62, they found the fortifications empty. Beauregard’s entire army had slipped S to Tupelo, 60 miles away. In the meantime, Union naval activity on the Mississippi largely depended upon the progress of Halleck’s campaign.… ”
  • 12. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Ibid. “…Halleck’s campaign. “After the capture of Island No. 10 in early Apr 62, the Union gunboats steamed downriver to lead the attack against the next Confederate strong point. That was Fort Pillow, on the east-bank bluffs of the Mississippi, the sole river fortification between the Union forces and Memphis….”
  • 13. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Ibid.
  • 14. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Ibid. “…and Memphis. Gen Pope’s 20,000 men landed above the fort but had made little progress before they were ordered to join Halleck in the Corinth campaign. In the absence of strong army support, the Union ironclads took turns guarding mortar boats which were brought down to bombard the Confederate position, for only the high arching trajectory of mortar fire could reach the fort from the river. Such activity had become routine by 9 May when Flag Officer Foote,• incapacitated by the wound he had received at Fort Donelson, turned over his command to Capt Charles H. Davis.• The very next morning a surprise attack by the rams of the Confederate River Defense Fleet produced a spirited engagement at Plum Point Bend above Fort Pillow….”
  • 15. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Ibid. “…Fort Pillow. After the Union ironclads Cincinnati and Mound City were sunk, the attackers withdrew with several of their ships damaged but able to drift downstream to the protection of the fort….”
  • 16. op. cit., pp. 293-294. “…the fort. “The action was humiliating to the North, even though both sunken gunboats were soon raised and repaired. The enemy had dashed in for a telling blow, taking advantage of Northern laxity, and had escaped from superior forces on which they had inflicted greater damage than they themselves had received. However this Confederate success did not save Fort Pillow. The Federal bombardment was resumed and continued for another three weeks until the Union victory at Corinth gave the Confederates in their outflanked position a dubious choice: either abandon the fort or remain to be captured in it. Explosions heard on the night of 4 Jun notified the gunboats that the fort was being evacuated. Burning their stores and destroying their precious artillery, the Confederate defenders withdrew. “Capt Davis, his force augmented by four maneuverable rams commanded by • Col Charles Ellet of the Union Army Engineers, now had an opportunity to avenge the humiliation of Plum Point Bend….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After
  • 17. op. cit., pp. 293-294. “…Point Bend. His fleet steamed down to Memphis,• arriving early on 6 Jun. The townspeople lined the heights along the river to see the show, confident in the eight rams of the Confederate River Defense Fleet, which formed in a double line before the city….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After
  • 18. op. cit., p. 294. “…the city. As Davis’ five ironclads approached within range, two of Ellet’s rams, Queen of the West and Monarch, darted ahead of the attackers to deliver the first blows. The surprised Confederate vessels, expecting to fight only sluggish gunboats, were thrown into disorder. The Queen of the West rammed and sank her first opponent, while the Monarch, slipping between two others, saw the Confederate rams crash into each other. Then the big Union gunboats closed in. In an hour’s melee four of the River Defense Fleet were sunk and three captured.… “ 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After
  • 19. op. cit., p. 294. “…three captured. Only one escaped downstream. None of the Union ships was lost. Flag Officer Davis accepted the surrenderer of Memphis, reported four large river steamers seized as prizes, and, by 1100 that morning, turned the city over to Col Fitch for occupation by a detachment of the Indiana brigade. The Mississippi was now open to Federal gunboats as far S as Vicksburg.
  • 20. From New Orleans to Vicksburg Ibid. “Neither Farragut nor the captains of his fleet were at all happy in their irregular advance up the Mississippi during the month following the occupation of New Orleans. If the Hartford had been a great sperm whale from the Pacific, she could not have been more out of her element—fighting the mud, snags, driftwood, current, and unending corkscrew bends of the river. ‘The elements of destruction to the Navy in this river are beyond anything I ever encountered, and if the same destruction continues the whole Navy will be destroyed in twelve months,’ Farragut lamented. ‘More anchors have been lost and vessels ruined than I have seen in a lifetime, and those vessels which do not run into others are themselves run into and crushed in such a manner as to render them unseaworthy…their sides are smashed in, their cutwaters entirely broomed up and removed….They all require more or less repairs in their machinery, but the hulls all require docking—ribs broken, plank sheer gone, stems torn off to the wood ends, etc.’1 “Baton Rouge, then a town of 7,000 people, was occupied on 8 May, and the ships pressed on. Even with the large Federal sloops in danger of being trapped hundreds of miles above New Orleans when the spring flood waters subsided, Farragut had no choice but to carry out his original orders….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After ______ 1 Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of the Great Rebellion, Series I, XVIII, 521.
  • 21. From New Orleans to Vicksburg Ibid. “…original orders. He sent the gunboats ahead and followed after them. On 12 May the Iroquois accepted the nominal surrender of Natchez, and by 18 May the Oneida was off Vicksburg demanding its surrender. The Military Governor there boasted, ‘Mississippians don’t know, and refuse to learn, how to surrender to an enemy.’2 Farragut transferred his flag to the Kennebec and was himself off Vicksburg four days later to determine the best course of action. ‘There is very little use in attacking Vicksburg,’ he wrote Gen Butler, ‘as the guns on the height are so elevated that our fire will not be felt by them.’ He decided to leave the gunboats to blockade Vicksburg ‘until the battle of Corinth shall decide its fate,’3 and returned to New Orleans with the heavy ships. “Instead of waiting for Halleck’s army to move, Farragut would willingly have taken prompt action against Mobile.• Porter was all for it but a message from his friend Fox • showed how the wind blew in Washington. The Assistant Secretary wrote in a dispatch to Porter on 17 May, while Farragut was in fact at Natchez, ‘someone has made a serious blunder in persuading the flag Officer to go at Mobile instead of obeying his instructions to go up the Mississippi River.’….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After ______ 2 Ibid., 492. 3 Ibid., 507.
  • 22. From New Orleans to Vicksburg op. cit., pp. 294-295. “…Mississippi River.’ He added rather hysterically and on the strength of nothing more than the Plum Point Bend fracas, ‘Davis has repulsed the iron rams of the enemy, but they are going at him and if they should be successful, Halleck would have to fall back and we should lose St. Louis, Cairo and everything.’4 The Confederate rams were of wood, not iron, and they made no second try, but Fox’s message serves to underscore the official recognition of control of the waterways as sine qua non for successful Federal military ops in the Mississippi Valley. “From New Orleans Farragut sent in a full-length report to Secretary Welles,• beginning almost wistfully: ‘I have just arrived here from up the river as high as Vicksburg, at least 300 miles farther than I was ever from sea water before since the days of my childhood.’5 Clearly he considered it quixotic to ascend the river again. Nevertheless, after suggesting to Welles that a monitor would be a more appropriate ship, he obediently set the Hartford to shepherding a flock of Porter’s mortar boats and a segment of Butler’s army N toward Vicksburg. “Midway between Memphis and New Orleans, Vicksburg occupied the naturally strongest point on the river and the only one that was then fortified by the Confederacy….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After ______ 4 Richard S. West, Jr., The Second Admiral (New York, 1937), 149. 5 Official Records, XVIII, 519.
  • 23. From New Orleans to Vicksburg “…the Confederacy. Halleck’s 100,000 men were now idle victors at Corinth, 300 miles away, but only 80 miles by rail from Memphis whence steamers could easily transport a large army, its artillery and supplies, to Vicksburg. If 20,000 troops under Grant had been sent down at this time,• they would certainly have captured the city. But Halleck was taking no chances—and winning no further victories.• When Farragut arrived for the second time off Vicksburg, the cooperating land forces were still too weak to attempt a frontal assault. On 28 Jun he ran past the Vicksburg batteries with eight of his ships, three turning back in the confusion of battle. As Farragut had predicted, fleet fire had little effect on Confederate guns emplaced on the heights.• “Davis had come down the river from Memphis without hindrance and at last the inland and sea-going navies were joined….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 295.
  • 24. From New Orleans to Vicksburg Ibid. “…were joined. In vain Farragut wrote Halleck for army reinforcements. The Federal offensive had stalled in its tracks. A year and a week would pass after Farragut’s rendezvous with Davis before the Stars and Stripes flew over Vicksburg. “As President Lincoln with prophetic foresight had told Cdr Porter in Nov 61, when they were discussing plans for the capture of New Orleans: ‘…we must have troops enough not only to hold New Orleans, but to proceed at once to Vicksburg, which is the key to all that country watered by the Mississippi and its tributaries. If the Confederates once fortify the neighboring hills, they will be able to hold that point for an indefinite time, and it will require a large force to dislodge them.’” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After
  • 25. Failure of the First Attack The Battle of Chickasaw Bayou, also called the Battle of Walnut Hills,[2] fought December 26–29, 1862, was the opening engagement of the Vicksburg Campaign.... Confederate forces under LGen. John C. Pemberton repulsed an advance by Union MGen. William T. Sherman that was intended to lead to the capture of Vicksburg,…—Wikipedia Map of the Vicksburg Campaign December 62 - March 63. (detail).www.dean.usma.edu/history/web03/atlases/american_civil_war/ index.htm
  • 26. Ibid. “When three of Farragut’s ships failed to follow the Hartford around the horseshoe bend of the Mississippi past the guns at Vicksburg, the Admiral’s troubles had just begun. Ostensibly of course 1 Jul 62 was a day of Union triumph. That was the day when the fresh water and salt water navies joined forces and anchored above the city. Only a narrow neck of land separated them from the warships and troop transports that remained below. Casualties inflicted during the run past had been very light.• Gen Halleck now informed Farragut that he would be able to send down troops in a few weeks, even though none were available at the moment. The three Union commanders at Vicksburg—Farragut, Davis, and BGen Thomas Williams,….” Operations in the Vicksburg Area —Summer, 1862
  • 27. Ibid. “…Thomas Williams, whose 3,000 soldiers had been escorted up the river by the navy—agreed that no assault should be attempted until reinforcements arrived from Corinth. In the meantime, to harass MGen Earl Van Dorn • and his 15,000 men working on the city’s fortifications, four of Davis’ mortar boats above Vicksburg supplemented 16 of • Porter’s below in lobbing their shells into the Confederate positions. Lookouts in the Hartford reported occasional hits….” Operations in the Vicksburg Area —Summer, 1862
  • 28. op. cit., pp. 295-296. “…occasional hits. At the same time the Union army turned to digging a canal across the narrow neck of land between the two segments of the fleet.•A new channel which would by-pass Vicksburg beyond range of the city’s guns might even make a direct assault on the Confederate position unnecessary. Neither undertaking progresses very far….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Operations in the Vicksburg Area —Summer, 1862 The First Canal
  • 29. op. cit., pp. 295-296. “…very far. The mortar bombardment was no more than started when orders arrived from Secretary Welles transferring Porter and 12 of the mortar boats 2,000 miles to the aid of McClellan in VA.• The canal diggers, stricken by steaming heat and malaria, soon had over a third of their number on the sick list. The navy’s binnacle lists were almost as long. By mid-Jul the Union position off Vicksburg was clearly becoming untenable.• At last Halleck admitted that he could not send an army. Farragut was worried, for his large ships, needed on blockade duty in the Gulf, might be trapped in the river by low water. ….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Operations in the Vicksburg Area —Summer, 1862
  • 30. op. cit., pp. 295-296. “…low water. Action, when it came, was the result of the audacity of a single Confederate ironclad gunboat, the Arkansas.• “During those critical weeks of Jun and early Jul, one of the many Confederate defense projects was completion of the Arkansas, which to escape capture at Memphis had been towed to an improvised navy yard at Yazoo City on the Yazoo River N of Vicksburg….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Operations in the Vicksburg Area —Summer, 1862
  • 31. The Yazoo River was named by French explorer La Salle in 1682 as "Rivière des Yazous" in reference to the Yazoo tribe living near the river's mouth at its confluence with the Mississippi. The exact meaning of the term is unclear. One long held belief is that it means "river of death”. —Wikipedia Besides having a great name, the Yazoo, here outlined in broader Cyan, is the eastern border of the Mississippi Delta country—jbp
  • 32.
  • 33. “…of Vicksburg. The ship was much like the Union ironclads in size appearance and armament.• In lieu of armor plate, railroad rails covered her casemate. Her engine drove two propellers, but her machinery was entirely inadequate and never dependable….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 296. Operations in the Vicksburg Area —Summer, 1862
  • 34. “…never dependable. When she was completed in mid-Jul, the Confederates set in motion a grandiose plan for her to run down the Yazoo and through the Union fleet to Vicksburg, help liberate New Orleans, and eventually join the Confederate defense of Mobile. “On 15 Jul, the very day that the Arkansas steamed down the Yazoo, the ironclad Carondelet, the wooden gunboat Tyler, and the ram Queen of the West set out on a reconnaissance up the Yazoo. When the Union ships encountered the Confederate, they turned and ran. What followed, Secretary Welles described as ‘The most disreputable naval affair of the war.’6 After forcing the Carondelet aground and pursuing the others right into the midst of the Union fleet where she received numerous hits, the Arkansas steamed at a majestic two knots—her crippled engines could drive her no faster—through the completely surprised Union ships and to temporary safety under the guns of Vicksburg….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 296. Operations in the Vicksburg Area —Summer, 1862 ______ 6 Charles Lee Lewis, David Glasgow Farragut: Our First Admiral, (Annapolis, 1943), 123.
  • 35.
  • 36. Ibid. “…of Vicksburg. With ‘deep mortification,’ Farragut officially reported, ‘none of us had steam nor could get it up in time to pursue her, but she took the broadside of the whole fleet.’7 Battered though she was, the Arkansas now threatened the mortar boats and transports below the city. That night Farragut took his fleet and the ram Sumter past Vicksburg in an unsuccessful attempt to sink her. A few days later the ironclad Essex and the ram Queen of the West participated in an equally unsuccessful daylight attempt. Just at that juncture Farragut received orders giving him permission to withdraw downstream. The ships of the salt water fleet, with the Essex and Sumter and Gen Williams’ army (by this time 75% incapacitated by illness), departed with alacrity….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Operations in the Vicksburg Area —Summer, 1862 ______ 7 Official Records, XIX, 4.
  • 37. Ibid. “…with alacrity. Shortly afterwards, Davis took the fresh water navy 300 miles upstream to base at Helena, AR. Thus, by default, 500 miles of the Mississippi were reopened to the Confederacy. “Delighted by this turn of events, Gen Van Dorn immediately dispatched part of the Vicksburg garrison to join other Confederate troops under • MGen John C. Breckenridge in an effort to recapture Baton Rouge….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Operations in the Vicksburg Area —Summer, 1862
  • 38. op. cit., pp. 296-297. “…Baton Rouge. To make a simultaneous attack, as planned, the Arkansas cast off her lines at Vicksburg and had steamed within sight of Baton Rouge when her engines broke down. The Confederate army’s assault was repulsed thanks in good part to the Essex and two Union gunboats, which fired over the town and into the Confederate ranks as directed by a naval officer who had a clear view of the action from the top of the Louisiana State House. The Arkansas’ crew worked all that day and night to get their ship back into operation. When the Essex led a reinforced Union fleet upstream against her the next day, the Arkansas steamed out, but her engines immediately broke down again and she drifted helplessly ashore. Her crew, at last forced to abandon ship, set her afire to prevent her capture by the Union flotilla. The Essex threw in shells from a safe distance until the Arkansas was destroyed by the explosion of her own magazine….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Operations in the Vicksburg Area —Summer, 1862
  • 40. op. cit., pp. 296-297. “…own magazine. “Gen Williams had been killed in the battle, and the outnumbered Union troops were soon afterwards withdrawn from Baton Rouge. In the meantime the defeated Confederate forces began to fortify Port Hudson, on the E bank if the Mississippi a few miles upstream from Baton Rouge. Port Hudson’s fortifications were intended to stop Union offensives from the S, as Vicksburg had so successfully stoped those from the N….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Operations in the Vicksburg Area —Summer, 1862
  • 41.
  • 42.
  • 43. “As the geographical advantage had favored the North in breaking the first and second lines of Confederate defense, now the advantage shifted to the South. At one time in the geological history of the Mississippi Valley, a long arm of the sea had extended up from the Gulf of Mexico even beyond present-day Cairo, IL.•The bay thus formed, filled with sediment from many rivers, finally became an alluvial plain, so flat that the Mississippi meandered along numerous, shifting coils….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Vicksburg — Port Hudson Bastion op. cit., p. 297. Cairo
  • 44. “…shifting coils. Wherever the river ricocheted against the foot of the bluffs—the shoreline of the ancient sea —that bounded the plain to E and W, it created what became in the Civil War a natural strongpoint for the Confederate defenders. Columbus, Fort Pillow, Memphis, Vicksburg, Grand Gulf, and Port Hudson were all such natural strongpoints on the E bank. Of these Vicksburg was paramount. (see map page 300.)….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Vicksburg — Port Hudson Bastion op. cit., p. 297.
  • 45. “…page 300.) “Geography left Vicksburg vulnerable to attack only from the firm ground E of, or behind, the city. On the N the Yazoo basin, an elliptically shaped flood plain bounded on the E by the bluffs and on the W by the Mississippi extended 200 miles to Memphis….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Vicksburg — Port Hudson Bastion op. cit., p. 297.
  • 46. Ibid. “…to Memphis. On the S another basin extended from Vicksburg W of the Mississippi all the way to the Gulf,…” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Vicksburg — Port Hudson Bastion
  • 47. Ibid. “…the Gulf, and on the E bank the town of Grand Gulf and the Big Black River covered the city’s southern flank.•   Where the Mississippi made almost a 180º turn in front of Vicksburg, the sloping E bank reached its greatest height of 264 feet, the high point of a 30- mile ridge extending N to Haynes Bluff on the Yazoo and S to Grand Gulf on the Mississippi….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Vicksburg — Port Hudson Bastion
  • 48. Ibid. “…the Mississippi. During the second half of 1862 the Confederates made this entire ridge part of an integrated system of fortifications and the northern anchor of their defense bastion. “Port Hudson, 150 miles S of Vicksburg, commanded a similar bend of the river from similar heights. Because it was never threatened by forces as powerful as those the Union brought against Vicksburg, its defenses were less fully developed.• Port Hudson’s importance as a southern anchor for the Confederate defense was not so much in denying the Mississippi to the Federal government as in preserving for the Confederacy its last line of E-W communications via the Red River….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Vicksburg — Port Hudson Bastion
  • 49. Ibid. “…Red River. The Red River flowed into the Mississippi just above Port Hudson from deep in the Confederacy’s SW. Down it came Confederate meat and grain in vast quantities and European products shipped via Mexico. So long as the Confederacy held this line of communications with the outside world, there persisted the hope that the war could be pursued until foreign intervention or Northern war-weariness brought hostilities to an end. But if either Vicksburg or Port Hudson fell, the Red River would be blocked, and the fall of the remaining strong points must shortly follow. With the Mississippi firmly in Union hands, the ‘backbone of the rebellion’ would be broken.” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Vicksburg — Port Hudson Bastion
  • 50.
  • 51. op. cit., pp. 297-298. “The successful Confederate counterattack under Gen Braxton Bragg • which had penetrated almost as far as Louisville, KY during the summer of 1862 had thoroughly alarmed the Federal government. [And the military authorities in Cincinnati. It was the closest the war had come to here up to that point.] There was a consequent reshuffling of armies and commanders….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Failure of the First Attack on Vicksburg
  • 52. op. cit., pp. 297-298. “…and commanders. Grant’s forces holding the Memphis-Corinth line were so reduced in numbers that they had all they could do to maintain their position while awaiting reinforcements through the summer and early fall of 1862. A clash at Iuka [MS], SE of Corinth,• resulted in a concentrating of Confederate forces…” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Failure of the First Attack on Vicksburg
  • 53. op. cit., pp. 297-298. “…Confederate forces and gave Gen Van Dorn hope that he might be able to defeat Grant’s divided army in detail and force the Union troops all the way back to Fort Donelson. Van Dorn’s attack in Oct accomplished just the opposite result.• The Confederates lost 5,000 men— casualties and prisoners—….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After
  • 54. op. cit., pp. 297-298. “…and prisoners— and Van Dorn was replaced by the more cautious John C. Pemberton.• Grant was at last free to resume the offensive….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Failure of the First Attack on Vicksburg
  • 55. “…the offensive. “Since retiring to Helena after the Arkansas fiasco, Flag Officer Davis’ gunboats, on the defensive, trying to hold what had previously been gained, had been fighting guerrillas and convoying supplies on the Ohio, Cumberland, Tennessee, and Mississippi rivers. In Oct the 15 river gunboats were transferred from the Army to the Navy and as the ‘Mississippi Squadron,’ were placed under the command of David Dixon Porter,• now back from VA. Porter immediately reorganized his force along navy lines, had the older ships repaired and more heavily armed, and began adding new ironclads and ‘tinclad’ patrol craft to the fleet until eventually he had more than 60 vessels of various sorts….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 298. Failure of the First Attack on Vicksburg
  • 56. “…various sorts. Meanwhile he established himself on his flagship, the large river steamer Black Hawk,• with adequate facilities for administering his command….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 298. Failure of the First Attack on Vicksburg
  • 57. “…his command. “In Nov 62 Grant at last received permission from Washington to launch an offensive. His main base of supply at this time was at Columbus; his operational base, at Grand Junction; and his advance supply base at Holly Springs. His army depended for communications on a single rail line joining those points….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 298. Failure of the First Attack on Vicksburg
  • 58. “…his command. “In Nov 62 Grant at last received permission from Washington to launch an offensive. His main base of supply at this time was at Columbus; his operational base, at Grand Junction; and his advance supply base at Holly Springs. His army depended for communications on a single rail line joining those points….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 298. Failure of the First Attack on Vicksburg
  • 59. “…those points… His objective was the major Confederate base at Jackson, the capital of Mississippi, which flanked Vicksburg just as Corinth flanked Memphis. He knew that the Confederate Army, after withdrawing as far as Grenada, was preparing to contest his advance. Grant’s plan was to trap the Confederate forces by making a double attack.…” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 298. Failure of the First Attack on Vicksburg
  • 60. “…double attack. A combined op of some 32,000 men under Sherman,• supported by Porter, would depart from Memphis by ship for a direct attack on Vicksburg.…” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 298. Failure of the First Attack on Vicksburg
  • 61. “…on Vicksburg. In the meantime Grant himself would attack Grenada, expecting to fight a holding action which would keep so many Confederate soldiers occupied that Sherman would have no trouble.…” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 298. Failure of the First Attack on Vicksburg
  • 62. Ibid. “…no trouble. If the Confederate forces at Grenada retreated to Vicksburg, Grant would pursue and trap them there. If they retreated only Jackson, he would pursue and be joined by Sherman’s troops fromVicksburg. Grant’s plan, for all its ostensible logic, was wrecked by its dependence on an inadequate line of communications. “The Confederate defense plan was perforce flexible and opportunistic. Likelihood of a Federal offensive had caused • President Davis to visit both Jackson and Vicksburg in early Dec. He recognized their weakness and, in attempting to find a remedy, may have committed one of the great blunders of the war.…” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Failure of the First Attack on Vicksburg
  • 63. Ibid. “…the war. Instead of ordering reinforcements from the secondary AR theater of ops, as advised by • Gen Joseph Johnston, who was now in command of all Confederate forces between the Mississippi and Alleghenies, the Confederate President had 10,000 men transferred to • Pemberton from eastern TN. This was just 11 days before the great battle of Stone’s River that ended the East TN campaign in Confederate defeat. Even with these reinforcements, Pemberton had strength only for a delaying action. But the winter rains favored the defense as roads turned to mud, and the railroad down which the Confederates retreated, tearing up rails and ties as they went, would require time- consuming repairs before it would be of much use to the Union invaders. “Making excellent use of their interior position and knowledge of the terrain, the Southern generals proceeded to teach Grant some lessons. First, a raid by • Forrest’s cavalry cut the telegraph and wrecked the rail line between Grant’s advancing army and his main base at Columbus. For exactly those twelve days (19-30 Dec) during which Sherman took his army down-river and attacked Vicksburg, Grant had no communication with the outside world.…” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Failure of the First Attack on Vicksburg
  • 64. Ibid. “…outside world. The fatal blow was struck by Van Dorn with 2,500 men on a cavalry raid around Grant’s flank. Catching the 1,500 man guard at • Holly Springs completely by surprise, Van Dorn’s men destroyed the entire $1,500,000 supply dump.…” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Failure of the First Attack on Vicksburg
  • 65. Ibid. “…supply dump. With no logistic support, Grant’s army ignominiously retreated 80 miles to Grand Junction, living off the land.• Not only did Grant’s holding action collapse, but the Confederate regiments that faced him at Grenada were shifted by rail to Vicksburg in time to parry the second Union blow.…” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Failure of the First Attack on Vicksburg
  • 66. Ibid. “…Union blow. “Sherman and Porter meanwhile had reached the Vicksburg area via the Mississippi.…” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Failure of the First Attack on Vicksburg
  • 67.
  • 68. op. cit., pp. 298-299. “…the Mississippi. Porter’s task now was to convoy the transports into the Yazoo and protect them during the debarkation. First however the gunboats had to clear the lower Yazoo of mines, one of which sank the ironclad Cairo. The river fleet continued minesweeping until the Yazoo was cleared from its mouth, eight miles above Vicksburg, to Haynes Bluff, where Confederate batteries controlled the river.• The day after Christmas Sherman’s troops, virtually unopposed under cover of the gunboats, landed on the flats between the Mississippi and the high ground to the E. By this time Sherman had good reason to suspect that Grant was meeting resistance, but he had no way of learning what actually had happened. He could only proceed on the assumption that the ‘holding action’ was not so unsuccessful as to expose his own Vicksburg attack to certain defeat.…” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Failure of the First Attack on Vicksburg
  • 69. op. cit., pp. 298-299. “…certain defeat. “In drenching Dec rain, the Union forces deployed for assault along the five paths that led through swamplands to the Confederate fortifications on the bluffs. Though Sherman’s troops outnumbered the Confederates three to one, the defenders’ strongly entrenched position on the heights gave them an immense advantage, for the Union columns, confined to narrow approaches, could not bring their numbers to bear on a broad front.…” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Failure of the First Attack on Vicksburg
  • 70. “…broad front. In the Battle of Chickasaw Bluffs on the 29th, every Union attempt to storm the well-placed Confederate fortifications crumpled under massed artillery and rifle fire. At the end of the day Sherman had lost 2,000 men; the Confederates, only 187. “Sherman nevertheless planned a second attack for the new year. This time it was to be a night assault by 10,000 troops farther up the Yazoo, where the Confederate batteries were within range of the heavy guns of Porter’s fleet. Dense fog delayed the troop-laden gunboats so long that only a suicidal daylight attack would have been possible. By this time it was clearly evident to both Sherman and Porter that Grant’s plans had gone awry and that in view of the rising river waters and the continuous rain, the only sensible choice was to withdraw. “In their first attempt to capture Vicksburg, Grant, Sherman, and Porter thus tasted the humiliation of defeat by numerically inferior forces.” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Failure of the First Attack on Vicksburg op. cit., p. 299.
  • 71. Winter Campaign Gives towns, Fort Pemberton, railroads, drainage, and the location of "Gen. Grant's Army 75000" opposite Vicksburg. Brief notes describe the "land lying between the Mississippi and Yazoo rivers" and the first and second "inland expedition[s] of the enemy."--Wiki Hardie, T.S. (detail), title, above. Published by S.H. Goetzle & Co. Mobile, AL., 1 May 1863.
  • 72. “Mud, politics, and common sense finally compelled Grant to transfer his base of ops to the Mississippi in the winter of 1862-63. The heavy rains of an unusually wet season turned all roads into quagmires. If the Union Army was to advance in strength with artillery support, it must be by ship. After the failure of the Chickasaw Bluffs attack, Adm Porter and Gen Sherman had cooperated in a face-saving op against Arkansas Post…. ” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg op. cit., pp. 299, 301.
  • 73. “Mud, politics, and common sense finally compelled Grant to transfer his base of ops to the Mississippi in the winter of 1862-63. The heavy rains of an unusually wet season turned all roads into quagmires. If the Union Army was to advance in strength with artillery support, it must be by ship. After the failure of the Chickasaw Bluffs attack, Adm Porter and Gen Sherman had cooperated in a face-saving op against Arkansas Post,• where taking 5,000 Confederate prisoners had cost a thousand Federal casualties.• This undertaking was commanded by Gen John A. McClernand,• an Illinois politician who had talked President Lincoln into allowing him to raise troops in IL for an independent expedition against Vicksburg. To his everlasting credit,• Halleck thwarted this threat to a unified command: the upshot was that McClernand took a position over Sherman but subordinate to Grant. The Arkansas Post victory removed a nuisance from the Union flank but did not justify a general diversion of about 30,000 men to a trans-Mississippi campaign. Grant ordered an end to that ‘wild goose chase,’ as he correctly called it and by the end of Jan took command on the Mississippi himself as the only way of controlling both McClernand and the Vicksburg campaign…. ” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg op. cit., pp. 299, 301.
  • 74. “Mud, politics, and common sense finally compelled Grant to transfer his base of ops to the Mississippi in the winter of 1862-63. The heavy rains of an unusually wet season turned all roads into quagmires. If the Union Army was to advance in strength with artillery support, it must be by ship. After the failure of the Chickasaw Bluffs attack, Adm Porter and Gen Sherman had cooperated in a face-saving op against Arkansas Post,• where taking 5,000 Confederate prisoners had cost a thousand Federal casualties.• This undertaking was commanded by Gen John A. McClernand,• an Illinois politician who had talked President Lincoln into allowing him to raise troops in IL for an independent expedition against Vicksburg. To his everlasting credit,• Halleck thwarted this threat to a unified command: the upshot was that McClernand took a position over Sherman but subordinate to Grant. The Arkansas Post victory removed a nuisance from the Union flank but did not justify a general diversion of about 30,000 men to a trans-Mississippi campaign. Grant ordered an end to that ‘wild goose chase,’ as he correctly called it and by the end of Jan took command on the Mississippi himself as the only way of controlling both McClernand and the Vicksburg campaign…. ” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg op. cit., pp. 299, 301.
  • 75. “Mud, politics, and common sense finally compelled Grant to transfer his base of ops to the Mississippi in the winter of 1862-63. The heavy rains of an unusually wet season turned all roads into quagmires. If the Union Army was to advance in strength with artillery support, it must be by ship. After the failure of the Chickasaw Bluffs attack, Adm Porter and Gen Sherman had cooperated in a face-saving op against Arkansas Post,• where taking 5,000 Confederate prisoners had cost a thousand Federal casualties.• This undertaking was commanded by Gen John A. McClernand,• an Illinois politician who had talked President Lincoln into allowing him to raise troops in IL for an independent expedition against Vicksburg. To his everlasting credit,• Halleck thwarted this threat to a unified command: the upshot was that McClernand took a position over Sherman but subordinate to Grant. The Arkansas Post victory removed a nuisance from the Union flank but did not justify a general diversion of about 30,000 men to a trans-Mississippi campaign. Grant ordered an end to that ‘wild goose chase,’ as he correctly called it and by the end of Jan took command on the Mississippi himself as the only way of controlling both McClernand and the Vicksburg campaign…. ” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg op. cit., pp. 299, 301.
  • 76. “Mud, politics, and common sense finally compelled Grant to transfer his base of ops to the Mississippi in the winter of 1862-63. The heavy rains of an unusually wet season turned all roads into quagmires. If the Union Army was to advance in strength with artillery support, it must be by ship. After the failure of the Chickasaw Bluffs attack, Adm Porter and Gen Sherman had cooperated in a face-saving op against Arkansas Post,• where taking 5,000 Confederate prisoners had cost a thousand Federal casualties.• This undertaking was commanded by Gen John A. McClernand,• an Illinois politician who had talked President Lincoln into allowing him to raise troops in IL for an independent expedition against Vicksburg. To his everlasting credit,• Halleck thwarted this threat to a unified command: the upshot was that McClernand took a position over Sherman but subordinate to Grant. The Arkansas Post victory removed a nuisance from the Union flank but did not justify a general diversion of about 30,000 men to a trans-Mississippi campaign. Grant ordered an end to that ‘wild goose chase,’ as he correctly called it and by the end of Jan took command on the Mississippi himself as the only way of controlling both McClernand and the Vicksburg campaign…. ” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg op. cit., pp. 299, 301.
  • 77.
  • 78. “Mud, politics, and common sense finally compelled Grant to transfer his base of ops to the Mississippi in the winter of 1862-63. The heavy rains of an unusually wet season turned all roads into quagmires. If the Union Army was to advance in strength with artillery support, it must be by ship. After the failure of the Chickasaw Bluffs attack, Adm Porter and Gen Sherman had cooperated in a face-saving op against Arkansas Post,• where taking 5,000 Confederate prisoners had cost a thousand Federal casualties.• This undertaking was commanded by Gen John A. McClernand,• an Illinois politician who had talked President Lincoln into allowing him to raise troops in IL for an independent expedition against Vicksburg…. ” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg op. cit., pp. 299, 301.
  • 79. “Mud, politics, and common sense finally compelled Grant to transfer his base of ops to the Mississippi in the winter of 1862-63. The heavy rains of an unusually wet season turned all roads into quagmires. If the Union Army was to advance in strength with artillery support, it must be by ship. After the failure of the Chickasaw Bluffs attack, Adm Porter and Gen Sherman had cooperated in a face-saving op against Arkansas Post,• where taking 5,000 Confederate prisoners had cost a thousand Federal casualties.• This undertaking was commanded by Gen John A. McClernand,• an Illinois politician who had talked President Lincoln into allowing him to raise troops in IL for an independent expedition against Vicksburg. To his everlasting credit,• Halleck thwarted this threat to a unified command: the upshot was that McClernand took a position over Sherman but subordinate to Grant. The Arkansas Post victory removed a nuisance from the Union flank but did not justify a general diversion of about 30,000 men to a trans-Mississippi campaign. Grant ordered an end to that ‘wild goose chase,’ as he correctly called it and by the end of Jan took command on the Mississippi himself as the only way of controlling both McClernand and the Vicksburg campaign…. ” op. cit., pp. 299, 301.
  • 80. “…Vicksburg campaign. He established his combined army on the W bank at Milliken’s Bend just above Vicksburg with his rear base at Memphis 400 miles upstream. ”Too strong to be stormed, the Vicksburg defenses had to be flanked. The problem was : how? High water made it impossible to march an army past Vicksburg through the cypress swamps and flooded underbrush of the W shore, and even supposing troops could get past, no line of communications could be maintained on the river under Vicksburg’s guns. Grant seems to have believed that nothing decisive could be accomplished until the land again became dry enough for marching, but he was willing to try any likely alternatives that would keep his forces occupied and satisfy the impatience of his superiors. Actually, four ingenious schemes were undertaken during the winter of 62-63, and these together constitute the second campaign against Vicksburg.….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg op. cit., p. 301.
  • 81. “…Vicksburg campaign. He established his combined army on the W bank at Milliken’s Bend just above Vicksburg with his rear base at Memphis 400 miles upstream. ”Too strong to be stormed, the Vicksburg defenses had to be flanked. The problem was : how? High water made it impossible to march an army past Vicksburg through the cypress swamps and flooded underbrush of the W shore, and even supposing troops could get past, no line of communications could be maintained on the river under Vicksburg’s guns. Grant seems to have believed that nothing decisive could be accomplished until the land again became dry enough for marching, but he was willing to try any likely alternatives that would keep his forces occupied and satisfy the impatience of his superiors. Actually, four ingenious schemes were undertaken during the winter of 62-63, and these together constitute the second campaign against Vicksburg. “(1) Grant’s ‘Big Ditch.’ While Farragut and Davis dallied above Vicksburg in Jul 62,• Gen Williams’ troops had actually made a good beginning on their canal across the finger of land pointing towards the Confederate stronghold….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg op. cit., p. 301.
  • 82. “…Vicksburg campaign. He established his combined army on the W bank at Milliken’s Bend just above Vicksburg with his rear base at Memphis 400 miles upstream. ”Too strong to be stormed, the Vicksburg defenses had to be flanked. The problem was : how? High water made it impossible to march an army past Vicksburg through the cypress swamps and flooded underbrush of the W shore, and even supposing troops could get past, no line of communications could be maintained on the river under Vicksburg’s guns. Grant seems to have believed that nothing decisive could be accomplished until the land again became dry enough for marching, but he was willing to try any likely alternatives that would keep his forces occupied and satisfy the impatience of his superiors. Actually, four ingenious schemes were undertaken during the winter of 62-63, and these together constitute the second campaign against Vicksburg. “(1) Grant’s ‘Big Ditch.’ While Farragut and Davis dallied above Vicksburg in Jul 62,• Gen Williams’ troops had actually made a good beginning on their canal across the finger of land pointing towards the Confederate stronghold….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg op. cit., p. 301.
  • 83. “…Confederate stronghold. The falling level of the Mississippi and the Federal government’s opinion that the fate of Vicksburg was going to be settled by a great Union victory under • Halleck in the vicinity of Corinth made completion of the canal less important than saving the lives of the malaria-infected soldiers….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg Ibid.
  • 84. “…malaria-infected soldiers. Now, in the winter of 63, this project was revived, for it was remembered that a canal had succeeded at Island No. 10. The new ditch was to be a little over a mile long, 60 feet wide, and nine feet deep. The Northern press played up the progress the Army Engineers were making, trumpeting great expectations. By 8 Mar the goal was almost reached and flood waters were sweeping down the Mississippi to break through the last barrier. But instead of gouging out the last of the canal, the tumultuous waters flooded the peninsula, drowned horses and mules, swept away tents, destroyed machinery, made men flee for their lives to high ground, and plugged with silt and debris what canal there had been. The opponents of the canal who from the first had considered it an unholy interference with nature felt that their opinion had been vindicated….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg Ibid.
  • 85. “…been vindicated. The project was abandoned. “(2) Lake Providence and the Tensas Basin. There was another possible way around Vicksburg….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg Ibid.
  • 86. “…around Vicksburg. By cutting through miles of Cypress swamp a route 400 miles long could be constructed from Lake Providence, on the W bank of the Mississippi about 75 miles N of Vicksburg via the Bayou Baxter cypress swamp to Bayou Macon, then down the Macon, Tensas, and Ouachita rivers to the Red, and finally down the Red River to the Mississippi.• Presumably the route could be used for Grant’s troops to coordinate with • Banks’ in the capture of Port Hudson, which would in turn become the base for an attack from the S against Vicksburg. Union troops hacked away for two months at this nightmarish project before Grant withdrew them to take part in his spring offensive….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg Ibid.
  • 87. “(2) Lake Providence and the Tensas Basin. There was another possible way around Vicksburg By cutting through miles of Cypress swamp a route 400 miles long could be constructed from Lake Providence, on the W bank of the Mississippi about 75 miles N of Vicksburg via the Bayou Baxter cypress swamp to Bayou Macon, then down the Macon, Tensas, and Ouachita rivers to the Red, and finally down the Red River to the Mississippi. ….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg Ibid.
  • 88. “…the Mississippi. Presumably the route could be used for Grant’s troops to coordinate with • Banks’ in the capture of Port Hudson, which would in turn become the base for an attack from the S against Vicksburg. Union troops hacked away for two months at this nightmarish project before Grant withdrew them to take part in his spring offensive….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg Ibid.
  • 89. “…spring offensive. “(3) The Yazoo Pass Expedition. A more promising possibility for a joint expedition consisted of opening a route that would outflank Haynes Bluff,• the northern point of the Vicksburg outer defense line. Just S of Helena, AR and convenient to the Memphis base lay Yazoo Pass • running from the Mississippi to the tributaries of the Yazoo River….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg Ibid.
  • 90. “…spring offensive. “(3) The Yazoo Pass Expedition. A more promising possibility for a joint expedition consisted of opening a route that would outflank Haynes Bluff,• the northern point of the Vicksburg outer defense line. Just S of Helena, AR and convenient to the Memphis base lay Yazoo Pass • running from the Mississippi to the tributaries of the Yazoo River. Some steamboats had regularly taken the route until it was plugged by a flood-control levee in 1853. Shortly after Grant established his HQ at Milliken’s Bend, Porter broached the subject of this 700-mile outflanking expedition and received the general’s approval. The levee was blasted open and the waters of the Mississippi poured through. Two ironclads, six ‘tinclads,’ and two rams led the way. They were supported by 4,500 Union troops embarked in 13 transports….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg Ibid.
  • 91. “…spring offensive. “(3) The Yazoo Pass Expedition. A more promising possibility for a joint expedition consisted of opening a route that would outflank Haynes Bluff,• the northern point of the Vicksburg outer defense line. Just S of Helena, AR and convenient to the Memphis base lay Yazoo Pass • running from the Mississippi to the tributaries of the Yazoo River. Some steamboats had regularly taken the route until it was plugged by a flood-control levee in 1853. Shortly after Grant established his HQ at Milliken’s Bend, Porter broached the subject of this 700-mile outflanking expedition and received the general’s approval. The levee was blasted open and the waters of the Mississippi poured through. Two ironclads, six ‘tinclads,’ and two rams led the way. They were supported by 4,500 Union troops embarked in 13 transports….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg
  • 92. “…13 transports. The alert Confederates had felled huge trees across the channel, some as much as four feet in diameter and reaching from bank to bank. In the two weeks it took the expedition to hack its way through the Pass, a combination of narrow channels, overhanging trees, cypress stumps, and debris, abetted by Confederate sharpshooters, was unable to stop the slow progress of the Union fleet. At the end of a month’s struggle the ships were approaching the final bend of the Tallahatchie where it joins the Yalobusha to form the Yazoo. There the desperate Confederate defenders were in the process of throwing up an earthwork and cotton-bale fortification, Fort Pemberton,• armed with two heavy guns and supported by infantry….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg op. cit., pp. 301-302.
  • 93.
  • 94. “…by infantry. Occupying a flooded peninsula, the fort could not be attacked by anything short of amphib infantry or ships painfully restricted by the narrow, tortuous channel. This was the ‘roadblock’ that stopped the Union advance. During repeated attacks made over a period of several weeks,…” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg op. cit., p. 302.
  • 95. “…several weeks, each ironclad gunboat was severely damaged. Since the Navy’s gunboats failed to silence the fort and the Army was unable to stage an attack over the flooded countryside, each service found fault with the other. Reinforcements were brought up, but by then the Union leaders had become more interested in another alternative.• On 10 Apr the entire expedition was back on the Mississippi with nothing to show for the two months effort….” 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg op. cit., p. 302.
  • 96. “…months effort. “(4) The Steele’s Bayou Fiasco. At the very time that the Union forces were attempting to batter down Fort Pemberton, Adm Porter himself had launched a final expedition aimed at opening a route from the Mississippi to a point on the Yazoo between Yazoo City and Haynes’ Bluff. If successful, this attack would place the navigable, upper stretches of the Yazoo in Federal hands, bring about the abandonment of Yazoo City (and, of course, of Fort Pemberton, which was in essence a northern outpost of the Yazoo City defenses), and secure a good advanced base in Yazoo City for 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg Ibid. outflanking Vicksburg from the N. The route was even narrower and more tortuous than that of the Yazoo Pass. Porter was able to push five of the old Eads ironclads through the forest of cypress and willows, but the lighter warships and transports did not have power and weight enough to fight their way through the willow-choked channel….”
  • 97. “…willow-choked channel. Overhanging branches knocked off smokestacks, cypress trees had to be pulled up by their roots, and the willows had to be chopped down one by one. Finally the flotilla ground to a halt within sight of clear water but in a tangle of felled trees. Confederate sharpshooters kept the Union crews behind the protection of the casemates, and the ironclads, walled in by the levee on either side, found their big guns useless. When Southern slaves were forced to fell trees behind the gunboats, the expedition stood on the brink of disaster. Only the prompt arrival of the Army saved the ships.• Gen Sherman himself 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg Ibid. accompanied the major relieving force, its way lighted by candles in a fantastic night march. Porter’s feelings of relief found expression in his official report: ‘I do not know when I felt more pleased to see that gallant officer….”8 ______ 8 Official Records, XXIV, 477.
  • 98. “… gallant officer….”8 As it was, it took 11 days for the ironclads to extricate themselves. The channel was so narrow that the ships could not be turned around. Rudders were unshipped and ‘rebounding from tree to tree,’9 the ironclads reached the Mississippi on 27 Mar. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg Ibid. ______ 9 Alfred Thayer Mahan, The Gulf and Inland Waters, (New York, 1883, 150.
  • 99. “…27 Mar. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter Campaign Against Vicksburg Ibid. “Porter was thoroughly discouraged. ‘With the end of this expedition ends all my hopes of getting into Vicksburg in this direction….There is but one thing now to be done, and that is to start an army of 150,000 men from Memphis via Grenada, and let them go supplied with everything required to take Vicksburg.’10 “Grant, influenced by recent developments on the Mississippi and the political temperature in Washington, had other and more daring ideas. Advance through the Yazoo basin was hopeless, as Porter said, but returning to Memphis would look like defeat, and an attack via Grenada would require protecting a long LOC and rebuilding a railroad line as the army advanced. Grant knew what that would mean from his bitter experience of the past Dec. Yet he had to get behind Vicksburg. If he could not do it from the N, he would have to do it from the S. ______ 10 Official Records, XXIV, 479.
  • 100. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter’s Naval Activity on the Mississippi “Gen Banks had replaced Gen Butler in New Orleans at the end of 1862. More troops had arrived. The grand strategy now called for a joint expedition under Banks and Farragut to reduce Port Hudson, but neither the Army nor the Navy was ready. Banks’ position was very complex and entirely thankless. He had earned the nickname of ‘Dancing Master’ through his efforts to win over the influential citizens of the occupied city. He was plagued by speculators with political backing who demanded that the Army make it possible for them to get out the upland cotton. He was gravely concerned for the safety of NO, threatened more than once by Confederate armies in the general vicinity. His strength was thus largely absorbed by a multitude of tasks that had little to do with getting on with the war.• “For Farragut too the year began badly. On New Year’s Day two cotton-armored steamers with a single gun apiece captured the gunboat Harriet Lane and either seized or drove away the other Union ships blockading Galveston, TX. In reporting to Welles, the Admiral admitted that it would be difficult ‘to conceive a more pusillanimous surrenderer of a vessel to an enemy already in our power.’11 Three weeks later the Confederates also opened the blockade off Sabine Pass, when two of their cotton-clad gunboats took advantage of a calm day to capture the two Union sailing ships stationed there. All efforts to re-establish the blockade at those points failed. _____ 11 Ibid., XIX, 440. op. cit., pp. 302-303.
  • 101. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter’s Naval Activity on the Mississippi “…points failed. “On the Mississippi, the most important enterprise either Porter or Farragut could undertake was to dispute control of the river between Vicksburg and Port Hudson and raid the South’s Red River source of supply. Porter tried it first.• “On 1 Feb, Col Charles Ellet received orders to run the ram Queen of the West past the Vicksburg batteries, sink the steamer Vicksburg moored there, and then raid the Red River commerce….” op. cit., p. 303.
  • 102. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After The Winter’s Naval Activity on the Mississippi “…River commerce. The Union ram was hit repeatedly by solid shot and shell but got by the city in broad daylight on the morning of the 2nd without a single casualty. En route she damaged but did not sink the Vicksburg. Within the next few days the Queen of the West captured several valuable prizes, including a steamer with 110,000 pounds of pork and 500 hogs and another with 20 barrels of molasses, 10 hogsheads of sugar, and 30,000 pounds of flour. Both vessels had been bound with their provisions for the Confederate army at Port Hudson. “Porter sent the new ironclad • Indianola past Vicksburg on the night of 13-14 Feb to join Ellet. That impetuous 19-year-old colonel had been raising havoc up the Red River, but the Queen of the West grounded and was captured on the very day that the Indianola steamed down to join her….” op. cit., p. 303.
  • 103. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Ibid. “…join her. Then the Confederates completely turned the tables. Using the Queen of the West to head a flotilla, they pursued the Indianola and caught up with her just below Vicksburg, where she was defeated, run aground and captured. The last, if wry, laugh was Porter’s. Because his other ironclads were bulldozing the willows and cypress of the Yazoo Basin or patrolling upriver, the Indianola and Queen of the West in Confederate hands posed a real danger. So the Admiral had a coal barge equipped with barrel-pile smokestacks and log guns to look like a monitor and floated her past Vicksburg at night. She grounded below the city on the W bank but was pushed back into the stream by the Union troops stationed there. News of her coming caused the apprehensive captors of the Indianola to blow up their stranded prize,…” The Winter’s Naval Activity on the Mississippi
  • 104.
  • 105. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Ibid. “…stranded prize, and the Queen of the West retreated to the Louisiana waterways where she was eventually sunk by Farragut’s gunboats.• “The goings-on around Vicksburg struck Farragut as so much tomfoolery. If Porter intended to hold his ironclads for such time-wasting ops as the abortive Steele’s Bayou expedition, Farragut considered it was up to him to regain control of the Mississippi….” The Winter’s Naval Activity on the Mississippi
  • 106. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., pp. 303-304. “…the Mississippi. When he learned of the capture of the Queen of the West and the Indianola, he lost all patience. ‘I am all ready to make an attack on or run the batteries at Port Hudson,’ he wrote Secretary Welles, ‘so as to form a junction with the army and navy above Vicksburg.’12 The fact that Banks was ready to stage no more than a diversionary attack did not stop him. ‘The time has come,’ said Farragut, ‘there can be no more delay. I must go—army or no army.’13 “Once again Farragut directed the detailed preparations for taking a fleet past fortifications. This time he had the Hartford, Richmond, Monongahela, and Mississippi, with the gunboats Albatross, Genessee, and Kineo. The large ships were to proceed in that order past Port Hudson, each of the screw sloops with a gunboat lashed to her port quarter and the side-wheeler Mississippi bringing up the rear….” The Winter’s Naval Activity on the Mississippi _____ 12 Ibid., XIX, 644. 13 Lewis, Farragut: Our First Admiral, 168.
  • 107. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., pp. 303-304. “…the Mississippi. When he learned of the capture of the Queen of the West and the Indianola, he lost all patience. ‘I am all ready to make an attack on or run the batteries at Port Hudson,’ he wrote Secretary Welles, ‘so as to form a junction with the army and navy above Vicksburg.’12 The fact that Banks was ready to stage no more than a diversionary attack did not stop him. ‘The time has come,’ said Farragut, ‘there can be no more delay. I must go—army or no army.’13 “Once again Farragut directed the detailed preparations for taking a fleet past fortifications. This time he had the Hartford, Richmond, Monongahela, and Mississippi, with the gunboats Albatross, Genessee, and Kineo. The large ships were to proceed in that order past Port Hudson, each of the screw sloops with a gunboat lashed to her port quarter and the side-wheeler Mississippi bringing up the rear.• A flotilla of mortar boats and the ironclad Essex were assigned to shell the fortifications while the fleet steamed by. ‘I expect all to go by who are able,’ Farragut wrote in his general order to his fleet, ‘and I think the best protection against the enemy’s fire is a well-directed fire from our own guns—shell and shrapnel at a distance and grape when within 400 or 500 yards.’ ….”14 The Winter’s Naval Activity on the Mississippi
  • 108. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., pp. 303-304. “…the rear. A flotilla of mortar boats and the ironclad Essex were assigned to shell the fortifications while the fleet steamed by. ‘I expect all to go by who are able,’ Farragut wrote in his general order to his fleet, ‘and I think the best protection against the enemy’s fire is a well-directed fire from our own guns—shell and shrapnel at a distance and grape when within 400 or 500 yards.’ ….”14 The Winter’s Naval Activity on the Mississippi _____ 14 Official Records, XIX, 669.
  • 109. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 304. “…500 yards.’ “Leading the way in the Hartford on the dark, quiet night of 14 Mar, Farragut was probably in the best command position to accomplish his difficult undertaking. Besides a score of heavy Confederate guns and half again as many field pieces, he had to contend with the five-knot current, a 150º bend in the river, and the ingenuity of the defenders, who spotted the ships with locomotive headlights from the E bank and silhouetted them against huge bonfires on the W bank. “While making the sharp turn under Port Hudson’s batteries, the Hartford was thrown against the shore, but with the aid of the Albatross alongside, she returned to the channel and proceeded upstream.…” The Winter’s Naval Activity on the Mississippi
  • 110.
  • 111. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 304. “…proceeded upstream. Not another ship got past. The Richmond lost power when her steam safety valves were opened by a freak hit, and the Monongahela went off course in the smoke and spent 25 minutes aground under fire. Both screw-sloops managed to escape downstream with the help of their escorts. The Mississippi however went aground on the W bank directly opposite the Confederate batteries. Here as she caught fire from enemy shells her crew abandoned ship. The next morning she floated free, blew up, and sank. “Although only two of his vessels had succeeded in running the gantlet, Farragut set about determinedly patrolling the river between Vicksburg and Port Hudson so as to deny Red River supplies to both Confederate strong points.• Meanwhile Grant was completing preparations for his spring offensive.” The Winter’s Naval Activity on the Mississippi
  • 112. Vicksburg, Port Hudson, and the Red River Campaign A contemporary plan—Wikipedia Surveyed by Lieut. L. A. Wrotnowski, Top: Engr., USA, title, above, 1863.
  • 113.
  • 114.
  • 115. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Ibid. “In early Apr 1863, the falling level of the Mississippi finally made an overland route down the W bank available to the Union forces, and Grant began marching his army S. His plan was to cross the river, capture Grand Gulf, the southern outpost of the Vicksburg defenses,…” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 116. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Ibid. “…Vicksburg defenses, send 20,000 troops downstream to assist Banks in capturing Port Hudson, and then use the combined armies in the eventual overwhelming of Vicksburg. He expected Porter to run the ironclads past Vicksburg to support his crossing with their heavy guns. “ On the night of 16 Apr the Union fleet got underway. Flares and roaring bonfires lighted up the Federal ships for the Confederate gunners,…” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 117.
  • 118. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Ibid. “…Confederate gunners, and the vagaries of the current threw each of the larger ships into at least one 360º turn while passing the city. Remarkably enough, not a single Union sailor was killed and not one ironclad was critically damaged. Of the three supply-laden transports, one was sunk. A few nights later additional supply ships ran past Vicksburg to join the Union forces. “When prolonged bombardment from the ironclads failed to knock out the batteries at Grand Gulf, Grant and Porter shifted army and ships south…” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 119. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Ibid. “In early Apr 1863, the falling level of the Mississippi finally made an overland route down the W bank available to the Union forces, and Grant began marching his army S. His plan was to cross the river, capture Grand Gulf, the southern outpost of the Vicksburg defenses,• send 20,000 troops downstream to assist • Banks in capturing Port Hudson, and then use the combined armies in the eventual overwhelming of Vicksburg.• He expected Porter to run the ironclads past Vicksburg to support his crossing with their heavy guns. “ On the night of 16 Apr the Union fleet got underway. Flares and roaring bonfires lighted up the Federal ships for the Confederate gunners,• and the vagaries of the current threw each of the larger ships into at least one 360º turn while passing the city. Remarkably enough, not a single Union sailor was killed and not one ironclad was critically damaged. Of the three supply-laden transports, one was sunk. A few nights later additional supply ships ran past Vicksburg to join the Union forces.• “When prolonged bombardment from the ironclads failed to knock out the batteries at Grand Gulf, Grant and Porter shifted army and ships south and staged a practically unopposed landing at Bruinsberg, six miles farther downstream.• At the same time, to divert Confederate attention,• Sherman staged a mock landing near Haynes Bluff at the opposite end of the Confederate defenses just above Vicksburg. Sherman put on such a realistic show that the Confederates thought that this was the main thrust and Grant’s the diversionary move. “Thus were initiated the most brilliant ops of Grant’s career….” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 120. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., pp. 304-305. “…Grant’s career. By his success in moving his army to the E bank of the Mississippi he acquired the initiative,…” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 121. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., pp. 304-305. “…Grant’s career. By his success in moving his army to the E bank of the Mississippi he acquired the initiative, and did not relinquish it until he had captured Vicksburg. Moving first on Port Gibson, where the Bruinsberg-Vicksburg and Grand Gulf-Jackson roads converged, the Union van defeated a small Confederate force and thereby made Grand Gulf untenable. When the Union ships returned to Grand Gulf, they found it evacuated, and Grant’s army marched in from the E on 3 May….” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 122. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., pp. 304-305. “…Grant’s career. By his success in moving his army to the E bank of the Mississippi he acquired the initiative, and did not relinquish it until he had captured Vicksburg. Moving first on Port Gibson, where the Bruinsberg-Vicksburg and Grand Gulf-Jackson roads converged, the Union van defeated a small Confederate force and thereby made Grand Gulf untenable. When the Union ships returned to Grand Gulf, they found it evacuated, and Grant’s army marched in from the E on 3 May. “Grant had originally planned to move a part of his force S at this time, cooperating with Banks against Port Hudson. But Banks was not ready. Although Grant’s army of 45,000 (including Sherman’s men) was confronted with Confederate forces in MS numbering more than 65,000, Grant elected to keep the offensive….” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 123. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., pp. 304-305. “…Grant’s career. By his success in moving his army to the E bank of the Mississippi he acquired the initiative, and did not relinquish it until he had captured Vicksburg. Moving first on Port Gibson, where the Bruinsberg-Vicksburg and Grand Gulf-Jackson roads converged, the Union van defeated a small Confederate force and thereby made Grand Gulf untenable. When the Union ships returned to Grand Gulf, they found it evacuated, and Grant’s army marched in from the E on 3 May. “Grant had originally planned to move a part of his force S at this time, cooperating with Banks against Port Hudson. But Banks was not ready. Although Grant’s army of 45,000 (including Sherman’s men) was confronted with Confederate forces in MS numbering more than 65,000, Grant elected to keep the offensive. The essence of his strategy was to concentrate all his force against segments of the enemy one at a time….” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 124.
  • 125. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 305. “…a time. “Pemberton with 45,000 men was in the Vicksburg perimeter. Johnston was assembling a force of 20,000 at Jackson….” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 126. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 305. “…a time. “Pemberton with 45,000 men was in the Vicksburg perimeter.• Johnston was assembling a force of 20,000 at Jackson. If Grant moved E against Johnston, Pemberton would sever his LOC from Grand Gulf.….” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 127. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 305. “…a time. “Pemberton with 45,000 men was in the Vicksburg perimeter.• Johnston was assembling a force of 20,000 at Jackson. If Grant moved E against Johnston, Pemberton would sever his LOC from Grand Gulf. On the other hand, if Grant moved N against Pemberton, Johnston could come in behind him….” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 128. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 305. “…a time. “Pemberton with 45,000 men was in the Vicksburg perimeter.• Johnston was assembling a force of 20,000 at Jackson. If Grant moved E against Johnston, Pemberton would sever his LOC from Grand Gulf. On the other hand, if Grant moved N against Pemberton, Johnston could come in behind him. But the Union cavalry commander,• Col Benjamin H. Grierson, had already been dispatched on a 600-mile raid through MS: between 17 Apr and 2 May he had destroyed 60 miles of telegraph lines, cut three railroads, and disrupted Johnston’s communications from the N, E, and S.•….” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 129.
  • 130. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 305. “…a time. “Pemberton with 45,000 men was in the Vicksburg perimeter.• Johnston was assembling a force of 20,000 at Jackson. If Grant moved E against Johnston, Pemberton would sever his LOC from Grand Gulf. On the other hand, if Grant moved N against Pemberton, Johnston could come in behind him. But the Union cavalry commander,• Col Benjamin H. Grierson, had already been dispatched on a 600-mile raid through MS: between 17 Apr and 2 May he had destroyed 60 miles of telegraph lines, cut three railroads, and disrupted Johnston’s communications from the N, E, and S. Disregarding the cautious advice of his principal subordinates, Grant cut loose from his base on the river and marched on Jackson. “Grant brushed aside a small Confederate force at Raymond,…” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 131. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 305. “…a time. “Pemberton with 45,000 men was in the Vicksburg perimeter.• Johnston was assembling a force of 20,000 at Jackson. If Grant moved E against Johnston, Pemberton would sever his LOC from Grand Gulf. On the other hand, if Grant moved N against Pemberton, Johnston could come in behind him. But the Union cavalry commander,• Col Benjamin H. Grierson, had already been dispatched on a 600-mile raid through MS: between 17 Apr and 2 May he had destroyed 60 miles of telegraph lines, cut three railroads, and disrupted Johnston’s communications from the N, E, and S. Disregarding the cautious advice of his principal subordinates, Grant cut loose from his base on the river and marched on Jackson. “Grant brushed aside a small Confederate force at Raymond,…” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 132. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 305. “…a time. “Pemberton with 45,000 men was in the Vicksburg perimeter.• Johnston was assembling a force of 20,000 at Jackson. If Grant moved E against Johnston, Pemberton would sever his LOC from Grand Gulf. On the other hand, if Grant moved N against Pemberton, Johnston could come in behind him. But the Union cavalry commander,• Col Benjamin H. Grierson, had already been dispatched on a 600-mile raid through MS: between 17 Apr and 2 May he had destroyed 60 miles of telegraph lines, cut three railroads, and disrupted Johnston’s communications from the N, E, and S. Disregarding the cautious advice of his principal subordinates, Grant cut loose from his base on the river and marched on Jackson. “Grant brushed aside a small Confederate force at Raymond, and struck directly at Johnston’s little army at the state capital, driving the Confederates out. In the meantime Pemberton was expending the energy of his troops in grim determination to cut the nonexistent LOC between Grant and the Mississippi River.….” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 133. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Ibid. “…Mississippi River. Johnston, vainly attempting to unite the divided Confederate forces, ordered Pemberton to join him at Clinton,…” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 134. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Ibid. “…Mississippi River. Johnston, vainly attempting to unite the divided Confederate forces, ordered Pemberton to join him at Clinton, NW of Jackson. He was too late. Grant had already turned W toward Vicksburg, and on 16 May intercepted and routed 18,000 of Pemberton’s troops at Champion’s Hill….” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 135. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Ibid. “…Mississippi River. Johnston, vainly attempting to unite the divided Confederate forces, ordered Pemberton to join him at Clinton, NW of Jackson. He was too late. Grant had already turned W toward Vicksburg, and on 16 May intercepted and routed 18,000 of Pemberton’s troops at Champion’s Hill….” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 136. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Ibid. “…Mississippi River. Johnston, vainly attempting to unite the divided Confederate forces, ordered Pemberton to join him at Clinton, NW of Jackson. He was too late. Grant had already turned W toward Vicksburg, and on 16 May intercepted and routed 18,000 of Pemberton’s troops at Champion’s Hill. Continuing in hot pursuit, Grant on the following day brought to bay a 5,000-man Confederate force, smashing it and capturing a third of the men. Johnston was by now frantically ordering Pemberton to abandon Vicksburg….” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 137. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Ibid. “…Mississippi River. Johnston, vainly attempting to unite the divided Confederate forces, ordered Pemberton to join him at Clinton, NW of Jackson. He was too late. Grant had already turned W toward Vicksburg, and on 16 May intercepted and routed 18,000 of Pemberton’s troops at Champion’s Hill. Continuing in hot pursuit, Grant on the following day brought to bay a 5,000-man Confederate force, smashing it and capturing a third of the men. Johnston was by now frantically ordering Pemberton to abandon Vicksburg. But Sherman’s corps surged NW to engulf Haynes’ Bluff from the rear, and compel the evacuation of all defenses along the Yazoo N of Vicksburg. Firing from the gunboats on the river, the Union sailors watched Sherman’s cavalry chasing the enemy from Chickasaw Bluffs, where his men had suffered defeat five months earlier. Pemberton and his decimated army were surrounded in Vicksburg. Grant’s hungry men could once more be supplied from the fleet….” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 138. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Ibid. “…the fleet. “With supporting fire from the gunboats, Grant tried to storm Vicksburg but was repulsed. The Union force entrenched for a protracted siege….” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 139. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After Ibid. “…protracted siege. Time was on Grant’s side: a steady stream of reinforcements poured into his camp; the steady bombardment from land artillery and the gunboats in the river was reducing Vicksburg to rubble. Cut off from supplies the garrison was ultimately bound to be starved out. “After six weeks of siege, the end came. On 4 Jul 63 Pemberton surrendered; his 37,000 men marched out, stacked their arms, and departed on parole. Falling on the day following the defeat of Lee’s army at Gettysburg, the capture of Vicksburg shares with it a climatic position in the history of the Civil War. “Grant gave generous credit to the Navy for its vital role in the campaign. For not only did the Union ships maintain the Army’s single LOC—the Mississippi River between Cairo and Vicksburg—at the end of which the army was suspended like a Federal bucket in a Confederate well, but the Navy by its control of the river cut Pemberton off from reinforcement from, or escape to, the W. Operating at once as mobile heavy artillery and troop ferries, the gunboats ranged over the whole navigable waterway system in the theater of ops, destroying Confederate supplies, supporting Union garrisons under attack, and cutting off all enemy water-borne traffic.• “Meanwhile Farragut’s squadron had been performing similar services downstream….” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 140. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., pp. 305-306. “…services downstream. Urged on and closely supported by the Admiral, Gen Banks began the long-postponed offensive against Port Hudson in mid-May of 63. An assault on 27 May failed, and the pattern of bombardment and siege began.…” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 141. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., pp. 305-306. “…siege began. The Confederate garrison was still holding out when news of the fall of Vicksburg reached them, convincing them that protracting the struggle no longer conferred a military advantage. On 8 Jul they surrendered.…” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 142. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., pp. 305-306. “…they surrendered. “The river was clear at last to merchant shipping from the Northwest and Ohio Valley. The Confederacy was split, in effect extending the ‘Anaconda’ from the Gulf to Cairo. The Union’s right flank was secured from any major enfilading threat from the W. The sweeping right wing offensive that was to carry Sherman’s troops through Atlanta to the sea to cut off the retreat of Lee’s army in 1865 was now a strategic possibility.” The Capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson
  • 143. –Wikipedia Despite his ultimate success in winning the war, historians have often considered Vicksburg his finest campaign—imaginative, audacious, relentless, and a masterpiece of maneuver warfare. James M. McPherson • called Vicksburg "the most brilliant and innovative campaign of the Civil War"; • T. Harry Williams described it as "one of the classic campaigns of the Civil War and, indeed, of military history"; and the U.S. Army Field Manual 100–5 • (May 1986) called it "the most brilliant campaign ever fought on American soil."
  • 144. –Wikipedia President Lincoln announced, "The Father of Waters again goes unvexed to the sea.”*______ * Quoted in Ballard, Michael B., Vicksburg, The Campaign that Opened the Mississippi.Chapel Hill: U of NC Press, 2004. p. 410.
  • 145. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 306. “After the fall of Vicksburg and Port Hudson the next logical objective for joint army-navy ops was certainly Mobile.• Both Grant and Farragut favored an expedition whereby the armies of • Banks and Grant, with the support of Farragut’s squadron, would invest the last remaining Confederate port on the Gulf. The Gulf blockade would thus be completed,• and the Union forces could then advance N to trap the Confederate army being driven down from central TN….” The Red River Campaign
  • 146. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 306. “…central TN. But instead Grant was obliged to give his personal direction to the fighting at Chattanooga, and Banks became involved in strategic eccentric ops in TX. “Although from a purely military point of view campaigning W of the Mississippi was a needless dissipation of Union forces, there were reasons for it. The war was being fought to restore the authority of the Federal government; hence it was going to be necessary ultimately to occupy all Confederate territory. Furthermore, military success in TX could cut off the traffic in foreign goods that reached the Confederacy via Mexico. The Union government was also aroused by the implications of French activity S of the border….” The Red River Campaign
  • 147. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 306. “…the border. Napoleon III had permitted the use of French troops to support the Archduke Maximillian’s intervention in Mexican affairs.• It was believed that the French emperor favored an independent buffer state between Mexico and the US. If the Confederacy could not maintain its independence, then perhaps TX could be reconstituted an independent republic….” The Red River Campaign
  • 148. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 306. “…independent republic. Successful Union occupation of positions in TX might forestall serious post-war difficulties. Halleck accordingly ordered Banks to try. Banks’ first effort was a badly executed amphib attempt against Sabine on the LA-TX border. This was an ignominious failure….” The Red River Campaign
  • 149. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 306. “…independent republic. Successful Union occupation of positions in TX might forestall serious post-war difficulties. Halleck accordingly ordered Banks to try. Banks’ first effort was a badly executed amphib attempt against Sabine on the LA-TX border. This was an ignominious failure. Next, Banks with naval support occupied Brazos Island at the mouth of the Rio Grande and moved inland to capture Brownsville. The expedition then leapfrogged back up the coast with various minor triumphs until it reached Galveston When Banks requested additional forces to reduce the Confederate forces there, Halleck demurred….” The Red River Campaign
  • 150. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 306. “…independent republic. Successful Union occupation of positions in TX might forestall serious post-war difficulties. Halleck accordingly ordered Banks to try. Banks’ first effort was a badly executed amphib attempt against Sabine on the LA-TX border. This was an ignominious failure. Next, Banks with naval support occupied Brazos Island at the mouth of the Rio Grande and moved inland to capture Brownsville. The expedition then leapfrogged back up the coast with various minor triumphs until it reached Galveston When Banks requested additional forces to reduce the Confederate forces there, Halleck demurred. “For some time Northern cotton manufacturers had been exerting heavy pressure on the Union government to make it possible to obtain a greater supply of Southern cotton. Thousands of bales might be procured in the valley of the Red River,•which was navigable from the Mississippi NW across LA to Shreveport—in an area where there were reputedly many Northern sympathizers. Halleck suggested that Banks abandon the Galveston op and make Shreveport the primary military objective of a campaign up the Red River….” The Red River Campaign
  • 151. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., p. 306. “…independent republic. Successful Union occupation of positions in TX might forestall serious post-war difficulties. Halleck accordingly ordered Banks to try. Banks’ first effort was a badly executed amphib attempt against Sabine on the LA-TX border. This was an ignominious failure. Next, Banks with naval support occupied Brazos Island at the mouth of the Rio Grande and moved inland to capture Brownsville. The expedition then leapfrogged back up the coast with various minor triumphs until it reached Galveston When Banks requested additional forces to reduce the Confederate forces there, Halleck demurred. “For some time Northern cotton manufacturers had been exerting heavy pressure on the Union government to make it possible to obtain a greater supply of Southern cotton. Thousands of bales might be procured in the valley of the Red River,•which was navigable from the Mississippi NW across LA to Shreveport—in an area where there were reputedly many Northern sympathizers. Halleck suggested that Banks abandon the Galveston op and make Shreveport the primary military objective of a campaign up the Red River….” The Red River Campaign
  • 152. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., pp. 306-307. “…Red River. If Banks cared to enter TX via Shreveport, he could have the support of • MGen Frederick Steele’s AR army and the loan of a detachment from • Sherman’s force to assist him.….” The Red River Campaign
  • 153. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., pp. 306-307. “…Red River. If Banks cared to enter TX via Shreveport, he could have the support of • MGen Frederick Steele’s AR army and the loan of a detachment from • Sherman’s force to assist him. So the new year found Banks back in NO, where he was as much occupied by making arrangements for the inauguration of civil government in LA in Mar as by planning the Red River campaign….” The Red River Campaign
  • 154. 16: The Mississippi Valley Campaign, II: Vicksburg and After op. cit., pp. 306-307. “… Mar as by planning the Red River campaign. “Banks’ army was to march overland to rendezvous at Alexandria, LA on 17 Mar 64 with Sherman’s 10,000 men under • BGen A.J. Smith, who would come up the Red river with • Porter and the gunboats….” The Red River Campaign