Running head: PUT YOUR TITLE IN ALL CAPS HERE 1 PUT YOUR TITLE HERE IN ALL CAPS 2 Title in Upper and Lower Case Your Name Chamberlain Univesrity Course Number: Course Name Term Month and Year Title of your Paper in Upper and Lower Case (Centered, not Bold) This page begins your Pro-Con position Paper. Begin your introduction here. Be sure to incorporate an attention grabber. You may also provide any necessary contextual or background info here if needed. Do not attempt to prove the thesis statement in these sentences; don’t have obvious ideas. Prove the thesis below it, not above it. If appropriate, provide a bridge from the introductory sentences to the thesis. Remember to employ an objective tone by applying only 3rd person point of view (no 1st: I, me, my, we, our, us, mine) or 2nd: you, your person point of view), unless in direct quote. Then put your thesis statement here; the thesis must be one complete sentence combining your opposition’s argument and your rebuttal. 1st Counter-Argument (your oppositions’ point) Begin with a topic sentence written in your own words that presents your grounds. Next, apply the evidence/warrant. Signal phrases are highly recommended to introduce new sources (ex: According to Dr. John Smith, head physician at the Mayo Clinic…). Cite your sources in APA format via parenthetical citations. Follow through with a few sentences examining the evidence and connecting it back to your main point. If needed, apply any conciliatory language to connect to the audience and avoid putting them on the defensive. Strive 5-10 developed sentences in a college level paragraph. ****Note: based on which outline approach you chose in Week 5 (divided or alternating) your draft will either continue with 2 other counter-arguments similar to the one above, followed by 3 rebuttal paragraphs – or it will jump straight to the 1st rebuttal as demonstrated below. 1st Rebuttal (your point) Begin with a topic sentence written in your own words that presents your grounds. Then identify the first point of contention. Discuss this point and why you disagree with it. Point out faults in the argument; explain why the point has little merit. Then argue why your ideas are superior. Then, apply the evidence/warrant. Signal phrases are highly recommended to introduce new sources (ex: According to Dr. John Smith, head physician at the Mayo Clinic…). Cite your sources in APA format via parenthetical citations. Follow through with a few sentences examining the evidence and connecting it back to your main point. No conciliatory verbiage is needed in the rebuttal paragraph, but you should still remain objective and respectful. Strive for a minimum of 5 developed sentences in a college level paragraph. ….From here you will develop your remaining body paragraphs following a similar approach. In the final paper, students should have at least 6 body paragraphs: 3 counterarguments & 3 rebuttals, applying either the alternating or div ...

1. Running head: PUT YOUR TITLE IN ALL CAPS HERE 1
PUT YOUR TITLE HERE IN ALL CAPS 2
Title in Upper and Lower Case
Your Name
Chamberlain Univesrity
Course Number: Course Name
Term Month and Year
Title of your Paper in Upper and Lower Case (Centered, not
Bold)
This page begins your Pro-Con position Paper. Begin your
introduction here. Be sure to incorporate an attention grabber.
You may also provide any necessary contextual or background
info here if needed. Do not attempt to prove the thesis statement
in these sentences; don’t have obvious ideas. Prove the thesis
below it, not above it. If appropriate, provide a bridge from the
introductory sentences to the thesis. Remember to employ an
objective tone by applying only 3rd person point of view (no
1st: I, me, my, we, our, us, mine) or 2nd: you, your person point

2. of view), unless in direct quote. Then put your thesis statement
here; the thesis must be one complete sentence combining your
opposition’s argument and your rebuttal.
1st Counter-Argument (your oppositions’ point)
Begin with a topic sentence written in your own words that
presents your grounds. Next, apply the evidence/warrant.
Signal phrases are highly recommended to introduce new
sources (ex: According to Dr. John Smith, head physician at the
Mayo Clinic…). Cite your sources in APA format via
parenthetical citations. Follow through with a few sentences
examining the evidence and connecting it back to your main
point. If needed, apply any conciliatory language to connect to
the audience and avoid putting them on the defensive. Strive 5-
10 developed sentences in a college level paragraph.
****Note: based on which outline approach you chose in Week
5 (divided or alternating) your draft will either continue with 2
other counter-arguments similar to the one above, followed by 3
rebuttal paragraphs – or it will jump straight to the 1st rebuttal
as demonstrated below.
1st Rebuttal (your point)
Begin with a topic sentence written in your own words that
presents your grounds. Then identify the first point of
contention. Discuss this point and why you disagree with it.
Point out faults in the argument; explain why the point has little
merit. Then argue why your ideas are superior. Then, apply the
evidence/warrant. Signal phrases are highly recommended to
introduce new sources (ex: According to Dr. John Smith, head
physician at the Mayo Clinic…). Cite your sources in APA
format via parenthetical citations. Follow through with a few
sentences examining the evidence and connecting it back to
your main point. No conciliatory verbiage is needed in the
rebuttal paragraph, but you should still remain objective and
respectful. Strive for a minimum of 5 developed sentences in a
college level paragraph.
….From here you will develop your remaining body paragraphs

3. following a similar approach. In the final paper, students should
have at least 6 body paragraphs: 3 counterarguments & 3
rebuttals, applying either the alternating or divided
organizational approach.
Then put your conclusion or final paragraph here. Reiterate
your main argument. Avoid repetition or straight summarizing
of earlier information. Instead, apply one of the concluding
techniques from our reading or Week 3 lesson. As before, strive
for a minimum of 5 developed sentences per paragraph. Then
revise, edit, and proof your draft….and submit for an ‘A’!
References
Cite all 5 required credible sources here in APA format. List
sources alphabetically.
ENGL147N-60265 Discussions Week 6 Discussion 1: Rebuttals
…!

4. "
This is a graded discussion:
25 points possible
due Aug 19 at 1:59am
Week 6 Discussion 1:
Rebuttals and Refutations
14 14
Search entries or author
# Reply
Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapter 8
Lesson: Week 5, 6
Minimum of 1 new scholarly source
Apply the following writing resources to your posts:
Link (multimedia presentation): Citing References
in Text
Link (website): APA Citation and Writing
Initial Post Instructions
Part 1: Research & Review
Review this week's lesson and reading. Find an
academic source to back up your opposition's point of

5. view. This is a new source, in addition to the source you
located last week.
Part 2: Application
Anticipating readers' objections is one way to determine
what other sections to include and support in your
paper. Practice writing a counterargument that applies
the Toulmin model. Incorporate one of the new sources
you have gathered to present your opposition's point.
Strive for at least 5 developed sentences. Cite your
source in APA format.
1. Grounds / 1st Counterargument (your
opposition's point)
2. Backing (establish credibility of the source)
3. Warrant (evidence)
4. Possible concession / conclusion
Answer the following prompts:
How were you able to remain objective while
presenting the opponent's point of view?
What challenges did you face obtaining evidence
to back up the assertion?
Which conciliatory approach did you apply and
why?
How was it effective?
Follow-Up Post Instructions
Respond to at least two peers or one peer and the
instructor. Here, we have an opportunity to compare
research notes with our fellow peers. As peers, reply to
one another explaining whether or not your classmates
are presenting the opposition objectively and provide
potential refutations pointers. Give one another ideas or

6. suggestions for points that may be left out or might
need to be further developed.
Note: If you see that someone has already received
feedback from two peers, please choose to help a peer
who has yet to obtain feedback.
Writing Requirements
Minimum of 3 posts (1 initial & 2 follow-up)
Initial Post Length: minimum of 3 college-level
paragraphs
APA format for in-text citations and list of
references
Grading
This activity will be graded using the Discussion
Grading Rubric. Please review the following link:
Link (webpage): Discussion Guidelines
Course Outcomes (CO): 3, 7
Due Date for Initial Post: By 11:59 p.m. MT on
Wednesday
Due Date for Follow-Up Posts: By 11:59 p.m. MT on
Sunday
Unread
$ %
&
Subscribe
THERESA GERGELA

7. (Instructor)
Jun 9, 2019
Edited by THERESA GERGELA on Jun 9 at 8:04pm
# Reply '
"
Folks, welcome to Week 6! With the completion
of Week 6, we will be three-quarters through with
the class . . . keep going!
Considering rebuttals and refutations, this should
not be a difficult task (locating an opposing view).
As an example, when I read Lor’s article (below), I
saw the purpose in the Abstract was to aid
librarians/libraries in “a time of post-discourse and
fake news” (Lor, 2018). My immediate take on
this turned out to be the opposite of the article’s
stance, as I read on, which focused on Trump and
his administration as the main purveyors of fake
news. I scanned the references list, and if I were
to write a rebuttal, I would challenge some of the
sources presented as quite liberal and
progressive, and/or biased, such as The New
York Times, the Washington Post and Huffington
Post. In planning my rebuttal, I would also include
respected scientists who either debunk, disagree
with or challenge the “global warming” thesis.
Again, it is very important to evaluate a writer’s
(list of) sources.
I think the subject of “fake news” and logical
fallacies are intertwined. It’s human nature to
believe those who share our views in general, but

8. being aware of or identifying specific logical
fallacies can be helpful. Be sure to review the
links on logical fallacies in this module. Think
about them the next time you view an
advertisement, listen to a politician speaking, or
read an article!
Remember to respond first by Wednesday (the
discussion opens Monday, August 12), and to
include an outside scholarly source in your initial
post. I think we will have some very constructive
posts this discussion!
Theresa
Lor, P. (2018). Democracy, information, and
libraries in a time of post-truth discourse. Library
Management, 39(5), 307-321. Retrieved from
https://chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login?
url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=a9h&AN=121841959&site=eds-
live&scope=site
Teresa Starner
Yesterday
# Reply '
"
Although much of the available evidence
supports the benefits of safe injection centers
further research into the sources of this data

9. show possible biases that may have affected the
outcomes. Kennedy, Karamouzian, and Kerr
(2017) of the British Columbia Centre on
Substance Use claim, majority of the studies
show “shortcomings, including employment of
search strategies that were narrow in scope,
application of broad study eligibility criteria that
resulted in the inclusion of low-quality evidence,
and/or lack of assessment of the quality of
included evidence” (p. 162). Out of the 47
studies examined, 28 were done in Vancouver
and 10 were done in Sydney (Kennedy, et. al,
2017, p. 162). This alone reduces the
availability of comparative data. Additionally, all
the studies were done at stand-alone facilities.
No hospital-affiliated or mobile sites were
included. Only observational research could be
conducted since random clinical trials in this
environment would be considered unethical.
Even though no negative outcomes related to
SICs were uncovered, in order to support the
claim of their benefit, there is a need for third
party, broad scope, and quality research to be
completed.
I was able to remain objective by acknowledging
the authors’ point of view is valid and is
supported by facts. “Recognizing the opposing
view shows a reader that you are informed on
viewpoints other than the one you believe to be
the strongest” (Week 6 lesson, 2019). As I
stated last week, I am struggling to find
scholarly information to support the con side of
this topic. What I am finding is in reference to
funding, lack of public support, and lack of
quality research. There are numerous non-
scholarly articles. Most of these do not have

10. supportive evidence to back their claim.
This is a controversial and emotional topic, so I
chose to use a possible concession to close
with. I do not want to spark an emotional
argument that will take away from the evidence
that supports the grounds.
References
Kennedy, M. C., Karamouzian, M., & Kerr, T.
(2017). Public Health and Public Order
Outcomes Associated with Supervised Drug
Consumption Facilities: A Systematic
Review. Current HIV/AIDS Reports, 14(5),
161-183. doi:10.1007/s11904-017-0363-y
Week 6 lesson: logical fallacies (2019) retrieved
from
https://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/468
38/pages/week-6-lesson-logical-
fallacies?module_item_id=5905697
Cindy Pemberton
Yesterday
# Reply '
"
Hello Professor & classmates,

11. It has been noted that while a vegan diet may have
many health benefits, it can also pose risks to our
heart health. It has been proven that vegan diets
lack Omega-3 fatty acids, like DHA, ALA and EPA,
which are essential for a healthy heart (Nordqvist,
2017), and other body functions. Omega-3 fatty
acids are found in grass fed beef, dairy, mackerel
and wild salmon, which are not eaten by a true
vegan (Nordqvist, 2017). In essence vegan diets do
not love our hearts and great consideration should
be made prior to switching to this type of diet.
I was able to remain objective while presenting the
opposition by setting aside my own feelings
regarding veganism and just looking at the facts
presented and the evidence to back them up. I did
not face any challenges in obtaining evidence to
back up the assertion, as all the information is
readily available to the public. The conciliatory
approach I applied was in the tone of my words,
because it shows respect and appreciation for the
opposition data. This was effective in that it kept the
approach calm and collective in the manner in which
it was relayed.
References
Nordqvist, C. (2017). "What to know about eating
vegan." Medical News Today. Retrieved
from
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/149636.
php.

12. Teresa Starner
Yesterday
# Reply '
"
Hi Cindy,
Your point and evidence are clearly understood.
I believe your tone was neutral and respectful as
you noted. I would of liked to the see credentials
of the source in your paragraph. In the
concession statement it may be more impactful
if you add some of the benefits of the vegan
diet. This article has a lot of good information
and will be useful for your paper. Good job!
Cindy Pemberton
Yesterday
# Reply '
"
Thanks for your critique Teresa. I will be
sure to make note and incorporate into my
writing for next time.
Kimberly Delancy
Yesterday
# Reply '

13. "
Cindy,
Thank you for your post. I agree with your
conciliatory approach. It shows respect for the
opposer. You note that vegan diets lack Omega-
3 fatty acids, which is essential in our diet. I am
interested in knowing whether there are any
studies that show that the lack of Omega-3 fatty
acids has had any negative affects on vegans
from a health standpoint. Overall good article
and loads of helpful information.
Best,
Kim
Kimberly Delancy
Yesterday
# Reply '
"
Professor Theresa & Classmates,
Many medical professionals believe
marijuana is beneficial for medical purposes, but
opposers believe it is just a gimmick. Several states
have begun to allow the citizens to vote for the right
to legalize marijuana for medicinal and in some
cases recreational use. “Approving medical
treatments by ballot initiatives sets a dangerous
precedent for public health”, according to Hagan
(2018). The state of Missouri believes this is an

14. experiment. If a state is considering using marijuana
for medicinal purposes then medical authorities
should be the deciding voters.
I was able to remain objective by
understanding that the point of view presented by
this author does had some validity. I did not have
any challenges obtaining evidence, as this author
used credible and medical sources which were
available to the public. The tone in which I used is
one of appreciation. It is okay to disagree with one’s
opinion while still showing respect. This approach is
effective as it shows, by tone, how information can
be discussed without arguing. It provides a platform
for both sides to present their data and be heard.
Best,
Kimberly Delancy, RN
References
Hagan, J. C., 3rd (2018). Don't let medicine in
Missouri go to pot: Oppose Sham Medical Marijuana
Referenda
on November 2018 Ballot. Missouri medicine,
115(5), 392-393. Retrieved from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6205
287/
THERESA GERGELA
(Instructor)
Yesterday

15. # Reply '
"
Kim,
Thanks for your post!
Rebuttal paragraph is clear and objective.
One way to head off any potential issues is
to use signal phrases as you have done
(Several states have, According to, The state
of Missouri believes....) this shows you are
clearly representing others' ideas without
specifically attacking or rejecting (for now).
Your explanation of remaining objective is
reasonable, respectful, and effective.
APA: Review punctuation for article and
journal titles. For suffixes, see examples:
Lucas, G., I. (2001). Tinkering with
details (Vol. 1). Hollywood, CA:
A.G.F.F.A. Publishing.
Lucas, G., II. (2012). You can always
change it later. Hollywood, CA:
A.G.F.F.A. Publishing.
Theresa
Cindy Pemberton
8:04am

16. # Reply '
"
Hi Kimberly
I was able to clearly identify your point and the
evidence stated. I think the tone used implys
respect to the opposer. I'm not sure if i sense
the appreciation in your post, also it would be
helpful if you note the credentials of the
source/author in your writing. However, the
content information is good and I think you have
the making of a good paper.
Thanks,
Kimberly Evans
Yesterday
# Reply '
"
Legalization of recreational marijuana would boost
the economy. This has already been proven in
states where legalization has already occurred.
According to Todd (2018, p.115), between 2014 and
2017, in Colorado alone, the tax revenue brought in
after marijuana was legalized was over 600 million
dollars. Tax dollars benefit education, healthcare,
transportation, and government assisted programs
just to name a few. Legalization would also decrease
unemployment by creating jobs. (Todd, 2018 p. 117)
The economic position proves to be beneficial in
many areas.

17. When I started this paper, I decided to take the con
position. Being a nurse on an acute mental health
unit, I frequently work with substance abuse. I see
the negative effects firsthand. Being such a
controversial topic, I thought it would be interesting
to learn more about it. Prior to this paper I had not
really put much thought into this debate. Remaining
objective is easy because I do not have any
personal interest, or immediate gains or losses
based on legalization.
I have not faced any challenges finding the positive
side of legalizing marijuana. I am finding a
substantial amount of information refuting my claim.
Using a conciliatory approach requires
nonthreatening language and a fair expressing of
the oppositions point. (Seyler & Brizee, 2019, p.
212) I feel I have accomplished both. This will be a
difficult point to dispute.
References
Seyler, D. U., & Brizee, A. (2019). Read, reason,
write: An argument text and reader (12 ed.). New
York. NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Todd, T. (2018). The benefits of marijuana
legalization and regulation. Berkeley Journal of
Criminal Law, 23(1), 100-119.
https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38NK3652D
Cindy Pemberton
8:18am
# Reply '

18. "
Hello Kimberly,
I enjoyed reading your post and learned
somethings not previously known, the point and
evidence were clearly stated. I believe the tone
used was calm and shows respect for the
opposer. I think it would be beneficial if you note
the credentials of the source and stats in your
writing. I also think your use of the conciliatory
approach is right on point. The information
provided is great and I believe your paper will all
be great.
Thanks
Teresa Starner
12:13pm
# Reply '
"
Kim,
The conciliatory approach is perfect for potential
emotional subjects. It creates a nonthreatening
tone and shows respect for opposition. This
article is informative and serves well to support
legalization. The grounds for the argument are
clear. The evidence is supportive. Being
published in the Berkeley journal I am sure Todd
adequately is credentialed to speak on this
subject. Thanks. Good job.

19. THERESA GERGELA
(Instructor)
3:25pm
# Reply '
"
Hi Kim,
I agree with Cindy and Teresa regarding
calmness, clarity, and non-aggressive tone;
it's appropriate for discussing a counter view.
Thanks for your discussion as well on your
current stance on the topic. Perhaps you
might counter the positives of economic
boons to a con (whether gateway drug,
impaired driving, adverse health affects, etc.),
so that the cost of healthcare would mitigate
any potential economic growth.
APA: Remember the period after year for in-
text; I think you just forgot one. Due to the
profound liberal nature of most higher ed.
classes, philosophy, professors, and
students, I am not surprised that there are
more pro than con articles on the subject. I'm
sure there are some out there -- but where
are they?! It's becoming more and more
difficult to be able to access opposing points
of view, at least in my opinion, and to what
I've observed over the past few years,
especially.
I look forward to reading your pro-con draft!

20. Theresa
Jaime Leavitt
6:56pm
"
Good afternoon class and professor,
Immunizations are
beneficial to children and has maternal benefits for
pregnant women. They help prevent a lot of
diseases that have a high morbidity or mortality rate
(Swamy & Beigi, 2015). Talking with your primary
physician or Obstetrician is important prior to
receiving these immunizations to education one self
and having informed decision prior to vaccination
due to the possibility of side effects. Some of these
side effects were high fever, seizures, and
consistent crying in children receiving the pertussis
vaccine. The old pertussis vaccine was also linked
to SIDS ( sudden infant death) , coma, and brain
damage (Offit & Bell, 2003). The source is from The
American Pediatrics Society, the year is past 5
years, but makes a good argument to be aware of
the possible side effects vaccines can cause.
Evidence was shown in trials and tracked by the
CDC (Centers of Disease). I didn't find it hard to link
a opposition because most medications have side
effects and most of the research for vaccines show
the side effects of each vaccine. Being aware of the
vaccine prior to receiving is important because it is
your body or your child's body that you are
protecting.

21. July 2019
Home
Syllabus
Announcements
Resources
Modules
Files
Grades
People
VoiceThread
Bookstore
Library Guides
Media Gallery
My Media
New Webex
Academic Sup-
port
Surveys
Account

22. Dashboard
Courses
Groups
Calendar
Inbox
Help
8/13/19, 7)13 PM
Page 1 of 1
ENGL147N-60265 Assignments Week 6 Assignment: Pro-Con
P…!
Total Points: 45.0
Week 6 Assignment: Pro-Con Po-
sition Paper Draft – Instructor
Review
Due Monday by 1:59am Points 45
Submitting a file upload
Pro-Con Position Draft Grading Rubric - 45 pts
Criteria Ratings Pts
5.0 pts

23. 10.0 pts
10.0 pts
10.0 pts
5.0 pts
5.0 pts
Submit Assignment
Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Lesson: Week 6; review Week 5 (organizational
patterns)
Link (Word doc): Pro-Con Position Paper Template
Minimum of 5 scholarly sources (including at least two
peer-reviewed sources)
Apply the following writing resources to your posts:
Link (multimedia presentation): APA Basics (Review
this tutorial for formatting an APA paper and title page.)
Link (multimedia presentation): Citing References in Text
Link (website): APA Citation and Writing
Instructions
For this assignment, you will submit a draft of your paper to
your instructor for review. The essay draft should follow one of
the two organizational patterns from the Week 5 lesson. Use
the Pro-Con Essay Template (in Required Resources) to
complete your draft.

24. Writing Requirements (APA format)
Length: 4-5 pages (not including title page or references
page)
1-inch margins
Double spaced
12-point Times New Roman font
Title page
References page (minimum of 5 scholarly resources,
including at least two peer-reviewed sources)
Grading
This activity will be graded using the Pro-Con Position Draft
Grading Rubric. Instructors will be providing broad feedback
based on the designated rubric areas. You are expected to
use this feedback, additional writing and APA resources, and
revision and proofreading strategies to fully improve the essay
for final submission.
Course Outcomes (CO): 7
Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday
Length 5.0 pts
Meets length requirement
0.0 pts
Does not meet length requirement
Paragraph
Development
10.0 pts
The

25. central
idea is
developed
and
expanded
with depth
of critical
thought.
The
writing
supports
claims
with
several
detailed
and
persuasive
examples.
8.5 pts
The central
idea is
developed.The
writing
supports
claims with
examples, but
additional
analysis or
examples
could
strengthen the
argument.
7.5 pts
The central

26. idea needs
more
development
with points
tying back to
the thesis.
The writing
supports
claims with
examples,
but the
examples
are not well-
developed
or
examined.
Additional
examples
and analysis
are needed
to make the
argument
more
persuasive.
6.0 pts
The
central
idea is not
developed,
and the
analysis
lacks
critical
thought.
The

27. central
idea is not
well-
supported
by claims
and/or
examples.
0.0 pts
No
effort
Source
Integration
10.0 pts
Paper
properly
references
and
integrates
5 scholarly
sources.
8.5 pts
Paper
properly
references
and
integrates
4 scholarly
sources.
7.5 pts
Paper
properly

28. references
and
integrates
3 scholarly
sources.
6.0 pts
Paper
properly
references
and
integrates
2 scholarly
sources.
0.0 pts
Paper
properly
references
and
integrates
0-1
scholarly
sources.
Organization 10.0 pts
Paper is
clear and
cohesive.
Introduction
and
conclusion
support the
overall flow
of the paper.

29. 8.5 pts
Paper is
basically
clear and
well-
organized
with a
minimum
of non-
related
material
present.
7.5 pts
Paper has
some issues
with clarity,
flow, and
cohesion.
Paper lacks
organization.
6.0 pts
Paper lacks
organization
and has
difficulty
staying on
track.
Central
themes are
difficult to
identify.
0.0 pts
No

30. effort
Writing:
Mechanics &
Usage
5.0 pts
The writing
is free of
major
errors in
grammar,
spelling,
and
punctuation
that would
detract
from a clear
reading of
the paper.
4.25 pts
The writing
contains a
few major
errors in
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation,
but the
errors do
not detract
from a clear
reading of
the text.

31. 3.75 pts
The writing
contains
some major
errors in
grammar,
spelling,
and
punctuation
that need to
be
addressed
for a clearer
reading of
the paper.
3.0 pts
The writing
contains
several
major
errors in
grammar,
spelling,
and
punctuation
that impede
a clear
reading of
the paper.
0.0 pts
No
effort
APA Paper

32. Format
5.0 pts
Paper is
formatted
to include
all 7 of the
following:
title page,
references
page,
Times New
Roman
font, 12-
point font,
double
spacing,
running
header,
and page
numbers.
4.25 pts
Paper is
formatted
to include
6 of the
following:
title page,
references
page,
Times New
Roman
font, 12-
point font,
double

33. spacing,
running
header,
and page
numbers.
3.75 pts
Paper is
formatted
to include
5 of the
following:
title page,
references
page,
Times New
Roman
font, 12-
point font,
double
spacing,
running
header,
and page
numbers.
3.0 pts
Paper is
formatted
to include
4 of the
following:
title page,
references
page,
Times New

34. Roman
font, 12-
point font,
double
spacing,
running
header,
and page
numbers.
0.0 pts
Paper is
formatted
to include
less than 4
of the
following:
title page,
references
page,
Times New
Roman
font, 12-
point font,
double
spacing,
running
header, and
page
numbers.
"Previous Next#
July 2019
Home

35. Syllabus
Announcements
Resources
Modules
Files
Grades
People
VoiceThread
Bookstore
Library Guides
Media Gallery
My Media
New Webex
Academic Sup-
port
Surveys
Account
Dashboard

36. Courses
Groups
Calendar
Inbox
Help
�
8/13/19, 7)09 PM
Page 1 of 1