SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  89
HISTORY
An early microscope was made in
1590 in Middelburg, Netherlands:
Hans Lippershey and Hans
Janssen.
Giovanni Faber coined the name
microscope
.
 Antoni van Leeuwenhoek who discovered red blood
cells and spermatozoa and helped popularize
microscopy as a technique. 9 Oct. 1676, Leeuwenhoek
reported the discovery of micro-organisms.
 In 1893 August Köhler developed a key technique for
sample illumination, Köhler illumination, which is
central to modern light microscopy.
TYPE OF MICROSCOPE
Light microscopes
bright-field microscope
dark-field microscope
phase-contrast microscope
fluorescence microscopes
Others - transmission electron
- scanning electron
ADVANTAGES
 Empirical choice of antibiotics can be
made on the basis of gram stain’s
report
 Choice of culture media for inoculation
can be made empirically
 Evaluate the quality of specimen
 Co-relate the smear findings with that
of culture
.
Provide internal quality control
when direct smear result are
compared to culture result
Accurate assesment of the WBC:RBC
Visualise key morphological features
Capsule- india ink
Spiral shape of treponemes – dark
ground microscopy
DIS-ADVANTAGE
Less sensitive then culture
method
Doesn’t permit the identification
of species
Problems in stained preparations
Carry over of organisms
Thickness requiring varying
decolouration times
TYPE OF MICROSCOPIC
EXAMS
WET
PREPARATION
• SALINE
• IODINE
• INDIAN INK
• LACTOPHENOL
BLUE
STAINED
PREPARATIONS
• GRAM STAIN
• Z-N STAIN
• TRICHROME
• CALCOFLOUR
WHITE
URINE
CAN BE DONE FOR:-
 Whether pus cells are present in
number indicative of infection
 Screening out negatives-Rant-
shepherd method
 When information urgently required
.
Presence of casts, crystals rbc’s-
non-infective condition
Co-relate with the culture findings
 Terminal spined egg --Schistosoma
haemtobium
Microfilariae in chyluria-
W. boncrofti
SCHISTOMA HAEMATOBIUM
Pre processing
 Generally MSU any time
 For urethritis, prostatitis- initial flow of
urine
 For AFB- EMU,3samples
 For wet film-
0.05ml + cover slip
1wbc/7hpf—significant pyuria
URINE WET MOUNT
FAT DROPLETS CONTAMINATED
.
RBC’S NEOPLASTIC CELLS
Interpretation of wet film
Symptomatic + pus but N/G-
Pus cells + squamous
epithelial cells-
DRAWBACKS
 It is laborious and time consuming
 May yield misleading result if performed
cursorily
CONCLUSION- should be reserved for special
investigation in selected cases.
SPUTUM
PRE PROCESSING
Homogenisation-
sputum +dithiotheritol
vortex for 15 sec
stand for 15min.
.
WET FILM:-
 For parasites
 For fungal elements
GRAM STAIN:-
 Evaluate the quality of sputum:-
WHO:- <10 PMN/epi. cells
FOR ADULTS :- >14 years
TYPE OF CELLS COUNT GRADE
NEUTROPHILS <10 0
10 - 25 +1
>25 +2
SQUAMOUS
EPITHELIAL
CELLS
10 - 25 - 1
>25 -2
MUCOUS PRESENT +1
.
Reject if – score <0
Only by squamous epithelium
Reject :->10 sq. epi/LPF
.
 To compare with culture result
 Wide diversity of bacterial forms –
salivary contamination
 Predominance of 1 potential
pathogenic form
Gram pos. diplococci pneumococci
Small slender GNB haemophilli
Cluster GPC Staph. aureus
SQUAMOUS EPITHELIUM
RESPIRATORY EPITHELIAL
CELLS
.Alveolar macrophages are recognized under low power by their characteristic
staining reaction and their size. They are very densely staining and sometimes
have a characteristic orange coloration. They are smaller than squamous
epithelial cells but are larger than polymorphs. They are often found embedded in
mucus strands. The presence of alveolar macrophages in a sputum smear
indicates that the material under examination originated from the lower
respiratory tract.
ALVEOLAR MACROPHAGE
CRUSHMAN’S SPIRAL
 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
Z-N STAIN
 Done on request
 GRADING
IF THE SLIDE HAS RESUL
T
GRADING NO. OF FIELDS TO
BE
EXAMINED
> 10 AFB/OIL FIELD POS 3+ 20
1 – 10 AFB/OIL FIELD POS 2+ 50
10 – 99 AFB/100 OIL
FIELD
POS 1+ 100
1 – 9 AFB/ 100 OIL
FIELD
POS SCANTY* 200NO AFB IN 100 OIL
FIELD
NEG 100
CRYPTOSPORIDIUM
AFB
THROAT SWAB
GRAMS STAIN
 For cause of pharyngitis it is
unreliable
Charecteristic pattern of fusiform @
spirochetes can be seen:- vincent’s
angina.
Albert’s stain done only when
requested
NASOPHARYNGEAL SWAB
 Done only in special cases
 Whooping cough – DFA
PUS
 GRAM’S STAIN
 Presence of relative number of polymorphs and bacteria
 WET FILM
 Presence of fungal elements
 Presence of motile bacteria
 Any refractile objects
 Spirochetes in pr. Syphilis by darkground microscopy
 Z-N STAIN
 When requested
PUS SPECIMEN
WET FILM
•Microscopically observation of well mixed uncentrifuged
fluid in a slide counting chamber.
•Relative numbers of polymorphs and lymphocytes should be
noted
•If only slight contamination with blood ,leucocytes and
erythrocytes to be counted separately.
•Leucocytes in numbers in excess of 1 per 1000 erythrocytes,
suggest presence of meningitis.
•0.2 mL
•Cell count is performed in Fuchs-Rosenthal slide chamber
Counting fluid contains:
•Glacial acetic acid 1ml
•Propan 1,2diol 2.5ml
•Crystal violet 1% in water 1.5 ml
•Distilled water 100ml
GRAM STAIN
 Reaction to gram’s stain
 Morphology of organism
 Type of leucocyte
 Pus cells-
 Pyogenic bacterial meningitis
 Amoebic meningo-encephalitis
•BACTERIA
•Gram-negative intracellular diplococci-
Neisseria meningitides
•Gram-positive diplococci or short streptococci
Streptococcus pneumonia
•Gram-negative bacilli-
Haemophilus influenza,
E.coli or other coliforms
•Yeast cells
unevenly stained ,irregular in size, showing budding-
Cryptococcus neoformans
.
 INDIAN INK PREPARATION
If yeast cell seen
From the deposit
Round to oval yeasts with clear
halo- C.neoformans
Z-N STAIN:-
•If requested
• diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis is
suspected
WET FILM:-
• for amoebic trophozoites
•Acanthamoeba
•Naegleria
GRAM STAIN OF CSF N.meningitidis:intracellular,gram-negative
diplococci
GRAM STAIN OF CSF:S.pneumoniae:gram positive
diplococci
Gram stain of CSF:H.influenzae:gram-negative pleomorphic
coccobacilli
HIGH VAGINAL SWAB
 WET FILM
 For motile trichomonas vaginalis:- pear shaped with jerky
motility
 Presence of polymorph
 Fungal elements:- hyphal form of candida
 GRAM STAIN
 Presence of pseudomycelium + yeast cells
 Clue cells
 GPB – Lactobacilli
 GN or gram variable bacilli
 AMSELS criteria
TRICHOMONAS VAGINALIS
GRAM’S STAIN T.VAGINALIS
NUGENT SCORING
Score Lactobacillus Gardnerella Curved bacteria
Morphotype /Vision field Morphotype/Vision field Morpho/field
0 >30 0 0
1 5—30 <1 1—5
2 1—4 1—4 >5
3 <1 5—30
4 0 >30
Scores
0-3= Normal flora
4-6= Intermediate flora
7-10= BV
CLUE CELL
Clue cell
OCULAR SPECIMEN
 GRAM’S STAIN
 Type of predominant wbc
 Multinucleated epithelial cells- herpes infection
 WET FILM
 Motile trophozoites- acanthamoeba
 Fungal hyphae
 SPECIAL STAINS
 DFA stain- chlamydia
- VZV,HSV
FUSARIUM
STOOL
 Routine smear examination not done
 Trophozoites are usually found in liquid or soft
stools
 Cysts usually found in fully formed stool
 Should be examined within 30 min. of passage
 PVA slides can be made to store
 For enterobius-NIH swab
Stool after saline spurge
 WET FILMS
 Motility of any trophozoite
 Cyst
 STAINED PREPARATIONS
IODINE WET MOUNT
 Detection of cysts
 Dead specimen of trophozoites
 For study of nuclear character for
identification of species
HELMINTHIC EGGS
OCULAR MICROMETER
.
HEIDENHAIN’S IRON-
HEMATOXYLIN
WHEATLEY’S TRICHROME
METHOD
E.histolytica cyst– Blue-green tinged
with purple in green background
SCOTCH – TAPE PREPARATION
GIARDIA INTESTINALIS
..
STOLL’S METHOD OF EGG COUNTING:
 4gm of stool are mixed with 56ml of N/10 NaOH in a
thick glass tube and thoroughly mixed to make a
uniform suspension.
 This is facilitated by adding a few glass beads and
closing the mouth with a rubber stopper and then
shaking vigorously.
 Exactly 0.15 ml of the emulsion is removed by a
measuring pipette and placed on a large
slide(3”x2”size).
.
 A coverslip measuring 22/40 mm is
then put over it .
 With the help of a mechanical stage , all
the eggs in the preparation are counted
 The number of eggs per gm of stool is
obtained by multiplying the count of
two such preparation by 100.
BLOOD
 PROTOZOAL INFECTIONS
 Malaria
 Babesiosis
 Chaga’s disease
 African Trypanosomiasis
 Leishmeniasis
 HELMINTHIC INFECTION
 Lymphatic filariasis
 loasis
WET FILM
 Examined microscopically for large, motile, exo-
erythrocytic parasites.
 Used for
 trypanosomes : rapid undulating and twisting
movement
 microfilariae. : whip like motion
 Blood must be examined within 1 hour of collection
to avoid morphological changes.
.
 For good parasite morphology, smears prepared
within 1 hour.
 After that time, Schüffner's stippling and other dots
may not be visible on stained films.
 However, overall organism morphology should still be
excellent if smears are prepared within two hours.
PBS
 .
.
 STAINED SMEAR
 LEISH MAN’S STAIN
 GIEMSA STAIN
 JSB STAIN
 FIELD’S STAIN
 Thin film
 Thick film
 Contact method
 Puddle method : when blood with anti-coagulent
used
.
 Blood films must be carefully reviewed for presence
of any blood parasites.
 These may vary in size from small intraerythrocytic
malaria or Babesia rings to large microfilariae.
 For this reason, it is recommended that blood films
be scanned using a 10x or 20x objective to search
for large forms (microfilariae, schizonts,
gametocytes).
 This should be followed by a thorough examination
(at least 300 fields), using the 100x oil immersion
objective
MALARIAL PARASITE
.
.
 Malarial infections should be reported as the
percentage of infected RBCs per 100 RBCs counted.
 At least 10 fields in thin film should be counted.
 In cases of low parasitemia (<5%
parasitemia),number of parasites/100 WBCs is done.
 This count may be performed on either thick or thin
blood films.
HOW RBC’S ARE SEEN
 RBCs – pale bluish-gray.
 Cytoplasm may contain pink stippling, called
Schüffner's dots, in Plasmodium vivax.
 Small, pink-to-red rod-like inclusions, called
“Maurer's clefts,” as in P. falciparum infected
erythrocytes.
 Small blue specks in cytoplasm (or homogeneous
bluish tinge) are found in reticulocytes, immature
erythrocytes, and may be present in uninfected or
infected erythrocytes.
WBC’S
.
Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, and Monocytes
Pale blue-grey cytoplasm and purple nucleus.
Eosinophils
Coarse, pink granules in cytoplasm.
Basophils
Coarse, deep blue granules in cytoplasm.
ESTIMATION OF PARASITE
DENSITY (NVBDCP)
Number of parasites X 8000
---------------------------------- = parasites per
microlitre
Number of leukocytes
 Simpler method of counting parasites in thick blood film.
+ = 1-10 parasites /100 (thick film) fields
+ + = 11-100 parasites /100 (thick film) fields
+ + + = 1-10 parasites /single (thick film) fields
+ + + + = >10 parasites /single (thick film) field
MICROFILARIA COUNT
 With help of a haemoglobinometer pipette 20 mm
square of blood is placed on a clean glass slide.
 Dried as thick film, dehaemoglobinised and stained
in the usual manner.
 Total number of microfilariae in thick smear
multiplied by 50 will give the number per ml of
blood.
LEISHMANIA
Amastigotes of
L. donovani (LD
bodies) are seen
in peripheral
blood smear.
Cytoplasm –
pale blue
Nucleus –
red
Parabasal
body –
deep red
Kinetoplast –
bright red
FLUORESCENT MICROSCOPY
 Kawamoto acridine orange process
 Use of benzothiocarboxypurine (BCP)
 Used when parasitic count >100/ml
HAIR,SKIN,NAIL SCRAPPING
 First proof of the etiology of disease
 Traditionally KOH preparation
 Calcofluor white stain- Inherent weak fluorescence
when viewed in blue light
 MALDI-TOF
 20% KOH + 40% Aq. DMSO(DIMETHYL
SULPHOXIDE)
 20% KOH + CALCOFLUOR
 Adhesive tape strippings
 Short curved hyphae with group of spherical cells
 Bananas and grapes
 Spaghetti and meat balls
MALASSEZIA FURFUR
DERMATOPHYTES
.

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Tendances (20)

Biochemical test of bacteria
Biochemical test of bacteriaBiochemical test of bacteria
Biochemical test of bacteria
 
Bacillus
Bacillus Bacillus
Bacillus
 
ClOSTRIDIUM perfringens
ClOSTRIDIUM perfringens ClOSTRIDIUM perfringens
ClOSTRIDIUM perfringens
 
Genus Escherichia coli
Genus Escherichia coliGenus Escherichia coli
Genus Escherichia coli
 
Oxidase test
Oxidase testOxidase test
Oxidase test
 
Laboratory diagnosis of fungal infections
Laboratory diagnosis of fungal infectionsLaboratory diagnosis of fungal infections
Laboratory diagnosis of fungal infections
 
Catalase test
Catalase testCatalase test
Catalase test
 
Pseudomonas
PseudomonasPseudomonas
Pseudomonas
 
Antifungal Susceptibility Test
Antifungal Susceptibility TestAntifungal Susceptibility Test
Antifungal Susceptibility Test
 
16. vibrio cholera
16. vibrio cholera16. vibrio cholera
16. vibrio cholera
 
Flagella Staining.pptx
Flagella Staining.pptxFlagella Staining.pptx
Flagella Staining.pptx
 
Automation of microbiology
Automation of microbiologyAutomation of microbiology
Automation of microbiology
 
Automated methods in the microbiology lab
Automated methods in the microbiology labAutomated methods in the microbiology lab
Automated methods in the microbiology lab
 
Salmonella
SalmonellaSalmonella
Salmonella
 
Antimicrobial sensitivity test
Antimicrobial sensitivity testAntimicrobial sensitivity test
Antimicrobial sensitivity test
 
Special stains
Special stainsSpecial stains
Special stains
 
Medical Microbiology Laboratory (biochemical tests - i)
Medical Microbiology Laboratory (biochemical tests - i)Medical Microbiology Laboratory (biochemical tests - i)
Medical Microbiology Laboratory (biochemical tests - i)
 
Anaerobic Culture Methods
Anaerobic Culture MethodsAnaerobic Culture Methods
Anaerobic Culture Methods
 
16. enterobacteriaceae
16. enterobacteriaceae16. enterobacteriaceae
16. enterobacteriaceae
 
Stainings
StainingsStainings
Stainings
 

En vedette

Microscopic examination of urine
Microscopic examination of urineMicroscopic examination of urine
Microscopic examination of urine
globalsoin
 
DIRECT MICROSCOPY PPT 1
DIRECT MICROSCOPY PPT 1DIRECT MICROSCOPY PPT 1
DIRECT MICROSCOPY PPT 1
joydeep1886
 
Fecal examination lab report
Fecal examination lab reportFecal examination lab report
Fecal examination lab report
Brian Musalo
 
ALISHA PS 1 FINAL REPORT - Copy
ALISHA PS 1 FINAL REPORT  - CopyALISHA PS 1 FINAL REPORT  - Copy
ALISHA PS 1 FINAL REPORT - Copy
Alisha Maben
 
01.26.12: Diarrhea and Malabsorption
01.26.12: Diarrhea and Malabsorption01.26.12: Diarrhea and Malabsorption
01.26.12: Diarrhea and Malabsorption
Open.Michigan
 

En vedette (20)

STOOL EXAMINATION
STOOL EXAMINATIONSTOOL EXAMINATION
STOOL EXAMINATION
 
Microscopic examination of urine
Microscopic examination of urineMicroscopic examination of urine
Microscopic examination of urine
 
Stool analysis
Stool analysisStool analysis
Stool analysis
 
DIRECT MICROSCOPY PPT 1
DIRECT MICROSCOPY PPT 1DIRECT MICROSCOPY PPT 1
DIRECT MICROSCOPY PPT 1
 
Urinalysis
UrinalysisUrinalysis
Urinalysis
 
Fecal examination lab report
Fecal examination lab reportFecal examination lab report
Fecal examination lab report
 
Urine analysis
Urine analysisUrine analysis
Urine analysis
 
CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL CASE DISCUSSION _ ON ESBL producing bacteria
CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL CASE DISCUSSION _ ON ESBL producing bacteriaCLINICOPATHOLOGICAL CASE DISCUSSION _ ON ESBL producing bacteria
CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL CASE DISCUSSION _ ON ESBL producing bacteria
 
Sexton436presentation
Sexton436presentationSexton436presentation
Sexton436presentation
 
ALISHA PS 1 FINAL REPORT - Copy
ALISHA PS 1 FINAL REPORT  - CopyALISHA PS 1 FINAL REPORT  - Copy
ALISHA PS 1 FINAL REPORT - Copy
 
Main steps in bacteriological diagnosis
Main steps in bacteriological diagnosisMain steps in bacteriological diagnosis
Main steps in bacteriological diagnosis
 
Stool examination
Stool examinationStool examination
Stool examination
 
Staphylococcal Skin Infections
Staphylococcal Skin InfectionsStaphylococcal Skin Infections
Staphylococcal Skin Infections
 
laboratory diagnosis of STI/RTI
laboratory diagnosis of STI/RTIlaboratory diagnosis of STI/RTI
laboratory diagnosis of STI/RTI
 
Sexually transmitted infections
Sexually transmitted infectionsSexually transmitted infections
Sexually transmitted infections
 
01.26.12: Diarrhea and Malabsorption
01.26.12: Diarrhea and Malabsorption01.26.12: Diarrhea and Malabsorption
01.26.12: Diarrhea and Malabsorption
 
Superficial Fungal Infections
Superficial  Fungal InfectionsSuperficial  Fungal Infections
Superficial Fungal Infections
 
Macroscopic and microscopic examination in bacteriology
Macroscopic and microscopic examination in bacteriologyMacroscopic and microscopic examination in bacteriology
Macroscopic and microscopic examination in bacteriology
 
Infections of the Genital Tract - Part II
Infections of the Genital Tract - Part IIInfections of the Genital Tract - Part II
Infections of the Genital Tract - Part II
 
Presentation 5
Presentation 5Presentation 5
Presentation 5
 

Similaire à Direct microscopy

lab_1introduction_and_diagnosis_of_parasite.pdf
lab_1introduction_and_diagnosis_of_parasite.pdflab_1introduction_and_diagnosis_of_parasite.pdf
lab_1introduction_and_diagnosis_of_parasite.pdf
AnuragKumarKumar4
 

Similaire à Direct microscopy (20)

CM Parasitic Infections 1.pdf
CM Parasitic Infections 1.pdfCM Parasitic Infections 1.pdf
CM Parasitic Infections 1.pdf
 
lab_1introduction_and_diagnosis_of_parasite.pdf
lab_1introduction_and_diagnosis_of_parasite.pdflab_1introduction_and_diagnosis_of_parasite.pdf
lab_1introduction_and_diagnosis_of_parasite.pdf
 
Mycobacterium I.pptx
Mycobacterium I.pptxMycobacterium I.pptx
Mycobacterium I.pptx
 
Sputum examination cytology and microscopy
Sputum examination cytology and microscopySputum examination cytology and microscopy
Sputum examination cytology and microscopy
 
Amoebiasis lecture
Amoebiasis lectureAmoebiasis lecture
Amoebiasis lecture
 
2 specimen collection
2 specimen collection2 specimen collection
2 specimen collection
 
Amoeba Notes 2014
Amoeba Notes 2014Amoeba Notes 2014
Amoeba Notes 2014
 
Leptospirosis and Borrelia infection.ppt
Leptospirosis and Borrelia infection.pptLeptospirosis and Borrelia infection.ppt
Leptospirosis and Borrelia infection.ppt
 
Filariasis laboratory diagnosis
Filariasis laboratory diagnosisFilariasis laboratory diagnosis
Filariasis laboratory diagnosis
 
Laboratory diagnosis of PUO
Laboratory diagnosis of PUOLaboratory diagnosis of PUO
Laboratory diagnosis of PUO
 
4 Malaria Diagnosis
4 Malaria Diagnosis4 Malaria Diagnosis
4 Malaria Diagnosis
 
Case presentation on malaria
Case presentation on malaria   Case presentation on malaria
Case presentation on malaria
 
Leptospirosis
LeptospirosisLeptospirosis
Leptospirosis
 
Mycobacterium
MycobacteriumMycobacterium
Mycobacterium
 
exfoliativecytology-130529075655-phpapp02.pdf
exfoliativecytology-130529075655-phpapp02.pdfexfoliativecytology-130529075655-phpapp02.pdf
exfoliativecytology-130529075655-phpapp02.pdf
 
Mpict New
Mpict NewMpict New
Mpict New
 
MYCOLOGY REVIEW
MYCOLOGY REVIEWMYCOLOGY REVIEW
MYCOLOGY REVIEW
 
SEMEN ANALYSIS PPT.pptx
SEMEN ANALYSIS PPT.pptxSEMEN ANALYSIS PPT.pptx
SEMEN ANALYSIS PPT.pptx
 
Malaria
MalariaMalaria
Malaria
 
Chicken pox(varicella).pptx
Chicken pox(varicella).pptxChicken pox(varicella).pptx
Chicken pox(varicella).pptx
 

Dernier

Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
MateoGardella
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
ciinovamais
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
QucHHunhnh
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfMaking and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Chris Hunter
 
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdfAn Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
SanaAli374401
 

Dernier (20)

Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
 
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
 
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
PROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docxPROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docx
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
 
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDMeasures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfMaking and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdfAn Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
 
fourth grading exam for kindergarten in writing
fourth grading exam for kindergarten in writingfourth grading exam for kindergarten in writing
fourth grading exam for kindergarten in writing
 

Direct microscopy

  • 1.
  • 2. HISTORY An early microscope was made in 1590 in Middelburg, Netherlands: Hans Lippershey and Hans Janssen. Giovanni Faber coined the name microscope
  • 3. .  Antoni van Leeuwenhoek who discovered red blood cells and spermatozoa and helped popularize microscopy as a technique. 9 Oct. 1676, Leeuwenhoek reported the discovery of micro-organisms.  In 1893 August Köhler developed a key technique for sample illumination, Köhler illumination, which is central to modern light microscopy.
  • 4. TYPE OF MICROSCOPE Light microscopes bright-field microscope dark-field microscope phase-contrast microscope fluorescence microscopes Others - transmission electron - scanning electron
  • 5. ADVANTAGES  Empirical choice of antibiotics can be made on the basis of gram stain’s report  Choice of culture media for inoculation can be made empirically  Evaluate the quality of specimen  Co-relate the smear findings with that of culture
  • 6. . Provide internal quality control when direct smear result are compared to culture result Accurate assesment of the WBC:RBC Visualise key morphological features Capsule- india ink Spiral shape of treponemes – dark ground microscopy
  • 7. DIS-ADVANTAGE Less sensitive then culture method Doesn’t permit the identification of species Problems in stained preparations Carry over of organisms Thickness requiring varying decolouration times
  • 8. TYPE OF MICROSCOPIC EXAMS WET PREPARATION • SALINE • IODINE • INDIAN INK • LACTOPHENOL BLUE STAINED PREPARATIONS • GRAM STAIN • Z-N STAIN • TRICHROME • CALCOFLOUR WHITE
  • 9. URINE CAN BE DONE FOR:-  Whether pus cells are present in number indicative of infection  Screening out negatives-Rant- shepherd method  When information urgently required
  • 10. . Presence of casts, crystals rbc’s- non-infective condition Co-relate with the culture findings  Terminal spined egg --Schistosoma haemtobium Microfilariae in chyluria- W. boncrofti
  • 12. Pre processing  Generally MSU any time  For urethritis, prostatitis- initial flow of urine  For AFB- EMU,3samples  For wet film- 0.05ml + cover slip 1wbc/7hpf—significant pyuria
  • 13. URINE WET MOUNT FAT DROPLETS CONTAMINATED
  • 15. Interpretation of wet film Symptomatic + pus but N/G- Pus cells + squamous epithelial cells-
  • 16. DRAWBACKS  It is laborious and time consuming  May yield misleading result if performed cursorily CONCLUSION- should be reserved for special investigation in selected cases.
  • 18. . WET FILM:-  For parasites  For fungal elements GRAM STAIN:-  Evaluate the quality of sputum:- WHO:- <10 PMN/epi. cells
  • 19. FOR ADULTS :- >14 years TYPE OF CELLS COUNT GRADE NEUTROPHILS <10 0 10 - 25 +1 >25 +2 SQUAMOUS EPITHELIAL CELLS 10 - 25 - 1 >25 -2 MUCOUS PRESENT +1
  • 20. . Reject if – score <0 Only by squamous epithelium Reject :->10 sq. epi/LPF
  • 21. .  To compare with culture result  Wide diversity of bacterial forms – salivary contamination  Predominance of 1 potential pathogenic form Gram pos. diplococci pneumococci Small slender GNB haemophilli Cluster GPC Staph. aureus
  • 24. .Alveolar macrophages are recognized under low power by their characteristic staining reaction and their size. They are very densely staining and sometimes have a characteristic orange coloration. They are smaller than squamous epithelial cells but are larger than polymorphs. They are often found embedded in mucus strands. The presence of alveolar macrophages in a sputum smear indicates that the material under examination originated from the lower respiratory tract.
  • 27. .
  • 28. .
  • 29. . .
  • 30. .
  • 31. .
  • 32. Z-N STAIN  Done on request  GRADING IF THE SLIDE HAS RESUL T GRADING NO. OF FIELDS TO BE EXAMINED > 10 AFB/OIL FIELD POS 3+ 20 1 – 10 AFB/OIL FIELD POS 2+ 50 10 – 99 AFB/100 OIL FIELD POS 1+ 100 1 – 9 AFB/ 100 OIL FIELD POS SCANTY* 200NO AFB IN 100 OIL FIELD NEG 100
  • 34. AFB
  • 35. THROAT SWAB GRAMS STAIN  For cause of pharyngitis it is unreliable Charecteristic pattern of fusiform @ spirochetes can be seen:- vincent’s angina. Albert’s stain done only when requested
  • 36. NASOPHARYNGEAL SWAB  Done only in special cases  Whooping cough – DFA
  • 37. PUS  GRAM’S STAIN  Presence of relative number of polymorphs and bacteria  WET FILM  Presence of fungal elements  Presence of motile bacteria  Any refractile objects  Spirochetes in pr. Syphilis by darkground microscopy  Z-N STAIN  When requested
  • 39.
  • 40. WET FILM •Microscopically observation of well mixed uncentrifuged fluid in a slide counting chamber. •Relative numbers of polymorphs and lymphocytes should be noted •If only slight contamination with blood ,leucocytes and erythrocytes to be counted separately.
  • 41. •Leucocytes in numbers in excess of 1 per 1000 erythrocytes, suggest presence of meningitis. •0.2 mL •Cell count is performed in Fuchs-Rosenthal slide chamber
  • 42. Counting fluid contains: •Glacial acetic acid 1ml •Propan 1,2diol 2.5ml •Crystal violet 1% in water 1.5 ml •Distilled water 100ml
  • 43. GRAM STAIN  Reaction to gram’s stain  Morphology of organism  Type of leucocyte  Pus cells-  Pyogenic bacterial meningitis  Amoebic meningo-encephalitis
  • 44. •BACTERIA •Gram-negative intracellular diplococci- Neisseria meningitides •Gram-positive diplococci or short streptococci Streptococcus pneumonia •Gram-negative bacilli- Haemophilus influenza, E.coli or other coliforms •Yeast cells unevenly stained ,irregular in size, showing budding- Cryptococcus neoformans
  • 45. .  INDIAN INK PREPARATION If yeast cell seen From the deposit Round to oval yeasts with clear halo- C.neoformans
  • 46. Z-N STAIN:- •If requested • diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis is suspected WET FILM:- • for amoebic trophozoites •Acanthamoeba •Naegleria
  • 47. GRAM STAIN OF CSF N.meningitidis:intracellular,gram-negative diplococci
  • 48. GRAM STAIN OF CSF:S.pneumoniae:gram positive diplococci
  • 49. Gram stain of CSF:H.influenzae:gram-negative pleomorphic coccobacilli
  • 50. HIGH VAGINAL SWAB  WET FILM  For motile trichomonas vaginalis:- pear shaped with jerky motility  Presence of polymorph  Fungal elements:- hyphal form of candida  GRAM STAIN  Presence of pseudomycelium + yeast cells  Clue cells  GPB – Lactobacilli  GN or gram variable bacilli  AMSELS criteria
  • 53. NUGENT SCORING Score Lactobacillus Gardnerella Curved bacteria Morphotype /Vision field Morphotype/Vision field Morpho/field 0 >30 0 0 1 5—30 <1 1—5 2 1—4 1—4 >5 3 <1 5—30 4 0 >30 Scores 0-3= Normal flora 4-6= Intermediate flora 7-10= BV
  • 55. OCULAR SPECIMEN  GRAM’S STAIN  Type of predominant wbc  Multinucleated epithelial cells- herpes infection  WET FILM  Motile trophozoites- acanthamoeba  Fungal hyphae  SPECIAL STAINS  DFA stain- chlamydia - VZV,HSV
  • 57. STOOL  Routine smear examination not done  Trophozoites are usually found in liquid or soft stools  Cysts usually found in fully formed stool  Should be examined within 30 min. of passage  PVA slides can be made to store  For enterobius-NIH swab Stool after saline spurge
  • 58.  WET FILMS  Motility of any trophozoite  Cyst  STAINED PREPARATIONS IODINE WET MOUNT  Detection of cysts  Dead specimen of trophozoites  For study of nuclear character for identification of species
  • 61. . HEIDENHAIN’S IRON- HEMATOXYLIN WHEATLEY’S TRICHROME METHOD E.histolytica cyst– Blue-green tinged with purple in green background SCOTCH – TAPE PREPARATION
  • 63.
  • 64. .. STOLL’S METHOD OF EGG COUNTING:  4gm of stool are mixed with 56ml of N/10 NaOH in a thick glass tube and thoroughly mixed to make a uniform suspension.  This is facilitated by adding a few glass beads and closing the mouth with a rubber stopper and then shaking vigorously.  Exactly 0.15 ml of the emulsion is removed by a measuring pipette and placed on a large slide(3”x2”size).
  • 65. .  A coverslip measuring 22/40 mm is then put over it .  With the help of a mechanical stage , all the eggs in the preparation are counted  The number of eggs per gm of stool is obtained by multiplying the count of two such preparation by 100.
  • 66. BLOOD  PROTOZOAL INFECTIONS  Malaria  Babesiosis  Chaga’s disease  African Trypanosomiasis  Leishmeniasis
  • 67.  HELMINTHIC INFECTION  Lymphatic filariasis  loasis
  • 68. WET FILM  Examined microscopically for large, motile, exo- erythrocytic parasites.  Used for  trypanosomes : rapid undulating and twisting movement  microfilariae. : whip like motion  Blood must be examined within 1 hour of collection to avoid morphological changes.
  • 69. .  For good parasite morphology, smears prepared within 1 hour.  After that time, Schüffner's stippling and other dots may not be visible on stained films.  However, overall organism morphology should still be excellent if smears are prepared within two hours.
  • 71. .  STAINED SMEAR  LEISH MAN’S STAIN  GIEMSA STAIN  JSB STAIN  FIELD’S STAIN  Thin film  Thick film  Contact method  Puddle method : when blood with anti-coagulent used
  • 72. .  Blood films must be carefully reviewed for presence of any blood parasites.  These may vary in size from small intraerythrocytic malaria or Babesia rings to large microfilariae.  For this reason, it is recommended that blood films be scanned using a 10x or 20x objective to search for large forms (microfilariae, schizonts, gametocytes).  This should be followed by a thorough examination (at least 300 fields), using the 100x oil immersion objective
  • 74. .  Malarial infections should be reported as the percentage of infected RBCs per 100 RBCs counted.  At least 10 fields in thin film should be counted.  In cases of low parasitemia (<5% parasitemia),number of parasites/100 WBCs is done.  This count may be performed on either thick or thin blood films.
  • 75.
  • 76.
  • 77.
  • 78. HOW RBC’S ARE SEEN  RBCs – pale bluish-gray.  Cytoplasm may contain pink stippling, called Schüffner's dots, in Plasmodium vivax.  Small, pink-to-red rod-like inclusions, called “Maurer's clefts,” as in P. falciparum infected erythrocytes.  Small blue specks in cytoplasm (or homogeneous bluish tinge) are found in reticulocytes, immature erythrocytes, and may be present in uninfected or infected erythrocytes.
  • 79. WBC’S . Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, and Monocytes Pale blue-grey cytoplasm and purple nucleus. Eosinophils Coarse, pink granules in cytoplasm. Basophils Coarse, deep blue granules in cytoplasm.
  • 80. ESTIMATION OF PARASITE DENSITY (NVBDCP) Number of parasites X 8000 ---------------------------------- = parasites per microlitre Number of leukocytes  Simpler method of counting parasites in thick blood film. + = 1-10 parasites /100 (thick film) fields + + = 11-100 parasites /100 (thick film) fields + + + = 1-10 parasites /single (thick film) fields + + + + = >10 parasites /single (thick film) field
  • 81. MICROFILARIA COUNT  With help of a haemoglobinometer pipette 20 mm square of blood is placed on a clean glass slide.  Dried as thick film, dehaemoglobinised and stained in the usual manner.  Total number of microfilariae in thick smear multiplied by 50 will give the number per ml of blood.
  • 82.
  • 83.
  • 84. LEISHMANIA Amastigotes of L. donovani (LD bodies) are seen in peripheral blood smear. Cytoplasm – pale blue Nucleus – red Parabasal body – deep red Kinetoplast – bright red
  • 85. FLUORESCENT MICROSCOPY  Kawamoto acridine orange process  Use of benzothiocarboxypurine (BCP)  Used when parasitic count >100/ml
  • 86. HAIR,SKIN,NAIL SCRAPPING  First proof of the etiology of disease  Traditionally KOH preparation  Calcofluor white stain- Inherent weak fluorescence when viewed in blue light  MALDI-TOF
  • 87.  20% KOH + 40% Aq. DMSO(DIMETHYL SULPHOXIDE)  20% KOH + CALCOFLUOR  Adhesive tape strippings  Short curved hyphae with group of spherical cells  Bananas and grapes  Spaghetti and meat balls MALASSEZIA FURFUR
  • 89. .