Publicité
School Monitoring, Evaluation and Adjustment- Activity Completion Report
School Monitoring, Evaluation and Adjustment- Activity Completion Report
School Monitoring, Evaluation and Adjustment- Activity Completion Report
School Monitoring, Evaluation and Adjustment- Activity Completion Report
Prochain SlideShare
Accomplishment Report SMM&E; June-July 2016Accomplishment Report SMM&E; June-July 2016
Chargement dans ... 3
1 sur 4
Publicité

Contenu connexe

Publicité

Plus de Dr. Joy Kenneth Sala Biasong(20)

Publicité

School Monitoring, Evaluation and Adjustment- Activity Completion Report

  1. Quality Assurance and Accountability Division ACTIVITY COMPLETION REPORT Title of the Activity: Regional Training Program on School Monitoring, Evaluation and Adjustment (SMEA) System for the Division Core of Trainers Training Objectives: The Training Program on School Monitoring, Evaluation and Adjustment (SMEA) System aims to: a. demonstrate understanding of the school Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) framework; b. describe the process flow of SMEA as part of the Monitoring, Evaluation and Adjustment (MEA) system in the region; c. validate the data gathered, consolidation and reporting tools needed to carry out the MEA process in schools; d. commit to transfer the MEA system in the schools; and e. develop training implementation plan for districts and schools on SMEA. (Reference: Regional Memorandum No. 222, s. 2013 dated April 5, 2013) Date: June 13-14, 2013 Venue: DepEd-Ecotech Center, Cebu City Host Division: Quality Assurance and Accountability Division (QAAD) Target Participants: Schools Division Superintendents, Assistant Schools Division Superintendents, School-Based Management (SBM) Coordinators, Planning Officers and Division Quality Assurance and Accountability Monitoring and Evaluation (QAA-M & E) Coordinators.
  2. Expected Number of Participants: 76 participants (4 participants of every schools division) Actual Number of Participants: 86 participants Training Facilitators: QAAD Training Program Team (Dr. Marcial P. Degamo, Mr. Sinfronio R. Thelmo, Dr. Estela B. Susvilla, Dr. Joy Kenneth S. Biasong, Mrs. Antoniette Cabando, Mr. Simon Bob Rios, Dr. Eduardo C. Bacaltos, Mrs. Merden L. Bryant and Mrs. Rosa H. Cabotaje) Budgetary Requirement: P150,000.00 (estimated amount- subject for audit). The stated amount is allocated for the expenditures relative to the conduct of the training such as rental of the venue, training materials, food and accommodation. Training Evaluation Rating: End of Training Assessment- Rating is 3---- means that the participants were satisfied on the quality of program planning, management, preparation, delivery of program content, trainees’ learning, trainers’ conduct of sessions, attainment of objectives, provision of support materials, services of the program management team, venue and accommodation. Narrative Report: The Quality Assurance and Accountability Division (QAAD) of DepEd-Regional Office VII successfully conducted the two-day Regional Training Program on School Monitoring, Evaluation and Adjustment (SMEA) System for the Division Core of Trainers held on June 13-14, 2013 at the DepEd-Ecotech Center, Cebu City. It was participated by the Schools Division Superintendents, Assistant Schools Division Superintendents, SBM Coordinators, Division QAA-M & E Coordinators and Planning Officers from the nineteen (19) Schools Divisions in Region VII. The purposes of M&E in the school are the following: a. Provide the school management and stakeholders information on the implementation of the curricular programs and projects as basis for continuously improving their relevance, efficiency and effectiveness;
  3. b. Provide information for school management to determine and adjust approaches and strategies that will ensure adequacy, equitable distribution, accessibility, and effective and optimal use of the resources of the school; c. Establish information as basis for determining appropriate approach / strategy to improve teaching-learning competencies of teachers to ensure efficient and effective delivery of instruction, classroom management, and their personal growth and professional development; d. Present information regarding learners’ performance to the school management that will support decisions and adjustments to plans and strategies to improve the learners’ academic achievement, school attendance, and participation in co- curricular activities; and e. Provide information for school management to review and sustain the strategies that can improve the school’s health and performance through efficient school- based management, productivity of the teaching and non-teaching staff and strengthening partnership with the community. In its entirety, Monitoring and Evaluation (M& E) in schools aims to: a. provide objective information that can inform decision-making in order to continuously improve the delivery of school services for basic education and the school’s performance and health to achieve the desired education outcomes; and b. provide valid, reliable and accurate data in decision-making to come up with possible actions and interventions to achieve the desired education outcomes. (Reference: School Monitoring and Evaluation Framework) Prepared by: Dr. Joy Kenneth S. Biasong QAAD Education Supervisor
  4. Noted: Dr. Marcial P. Degamo QAAD Chief Submitted to: Dr. Emiliano B. Elnar, Jr. Training and Development Division Chief
Publicité