Ccss 2015 petri
•Télécharger en tant que PPT, PDF•
1 j'aime•2,554 vues
Presentation on using peer review to increase the amount of historical writing in Social Studies classrooms. California Council for Social Studies.
Recommandé
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Tendances
Tendances (20)
En vedette
En vedette (8)
Similaire à Ccss 2015 petri
Similaire à Ccss 2015 petri (20)
Plus de Los Angeles Unified School District
Plus de Los Angeles Unified School District (15)
Ccss 2015 petri
- 1. Using Technology to Provide Peer Feedback on Historical Writing California Council for the Social Studies 54th Annual Conference March 6, 2015 Dr. Scott M. Petri
- 2. Why History Teachers Drink in the Afternoon
- 3. 1. Goal-setting approaches to student writing 2. Peer Review (with & without tech) 3. Pairing robo- graders with peer review You should leave this presentation determined to double the amount of writing you normally assign in your class.
- 5. Previously Analyzed Measures 1. Word Count/Length 2. Claims 3. Rebuttals 4. Argumentative Strategies 5. Document Use 6. Total Number of Citations 7. Number of Unique Documents 8. Highest Level of Document Use
- 6. P2 – Napoleon Essay (N=31) 6 missing assignments Low=48 Median=338 High=760 A B C D
- 7. Cohort II DBQ Performance Summary Class Per. Total Student Load Low Median High Missing/In complete Didn't Compl % Compl % P1 44 125 350 600 12 27% 73% P2 42 220 410 608 13 31% 69% P3 44 28 271 519 20 45% 55% P5 44 36 250 415 21 48% 52% P7 30 101 345 546 12 40% 60% P8 25 52 203 405 10 40% 60% AVG 38 94 305 516 15 39% 61%
- 8. Moving Forward Using peer review to move the burden of evaluation from teacher to student
- 11. Eugenics was also known as the science of good breeding. During the early 1900s through the 1930’s, eugenics was a well-respected and popular movement. After Hitler used eugenics to justify the killing of Jews, gays, and people with disabilities, the eugenics movement declined in popularity. Despite this, the eugenics movement should be viewed as positive because it ______________, ________________, and ______________. uses good breeding techniques to make
- 15. Student Comments on their Peers’ Writing I gave him this grade because he didn’t really have everything for the thesis. He didn’t really write the three reasons why this is his thesis. Every single one of his paragraphs supports his three legs from his thesis statement. He provides strong facts and supporting evidence. She gives a thesis and explains it in each separate paragraph, and you can clearly see when she talks about a new paragraph.
- 17. How Reliable is Peer Review?
- 18. What if I have No Tech?
- 21. Robo-Readers
- 22. Mayfield argues that automated essay scorers belong in the students hands because they “change the locus of control, making essay revision a choice led by a student at his or her own pace, instead of a punitive requirement from a teacher.”
- 23. This change has two benefits: (1) the negativity associated with assessment is under the student’s control. The student knows where they stand, so they seek to collaborate with the teacher to improve. The teacher and student now have the same goal. (2) automated revision histories enable students to “show their work” effortlessly. This gives teachers a better picture of student progress.
- 25. Hemingway App
- 26. Paper Rater
- 36. If we truly want to make students college and career ready, then we need to dramatically increase the amount of writing assigned to students across all subjects in high school.
- 37. Tweeting in 140 characters does little to prepare students for the kind of writing they will be expected to do in college. – Carol Jago
- 38. 1. Use goal-setting to evaluate student writing 2. Try Peer Review (with or without tech) 3. Pair this with robo-graders Double the amount of writing you assign in your class!
Notes de l'éditeur
- I have been using DBQs as formative assessments for the last five years. I was inspired by Chip Brady and the DBQ Project. I always start with his materials, but by the end of the year my students create their own DBQ.
- One way to improve people's ability to discriminate between poor and great performances on a particular task domain is to teach them discrimination skills. A 2nd Dunning Kruger experiment using mini-lectures to reteach concepts in logic resulted in poor performers, providing much more accurate self-ratings, judging their performance more harshly, and lowering confidence in their own reasoning.
- This demonstrates that high school students are capable of using higher order thinking skills and providing each other with cogent and meaningful feedback.
- The first of the original Dunning Kruger experiments featured undergraduate students who were asked to rate their performance. Then they predicted their raw score for the test just taken. The skills needed to produce logically sound arguments are the same skills that are necessary to recognize when a logically sound argument has been made. If people lack the skills to produce correct answers, they are also cursed with an inability to know when their answers, or anyone else's, are right or wrong. They cannot recognize their responses as mistaken, or other people's responses as superior to their own.