1. Vietnamese German University URBAN AND PARTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE Urban Indicators for managing cities - In Case study of Ho Chi Minh city Instructor: Dr. Dirk Heinrichs Students: NguyễnThùyLinh VõMỹ Y PhùngAnhKiệt PhanThanhBình NguyễnĐìnhKhoa

2. REQUIREMENTS Briefly give an overview: What kind of indicators (categories of indicators) are proposed from the Asia Development Bank? Make a judgment on the usefulness of the indicators (Validity, Reliability, Representativeness) with respect to the local situation in Ho Chi Minh City? Select 5 yourself that you find most relevant:. Why are they appropriate? How / where would you find the data?

4. Why

5. How

6. Where CONCLUSION

8. Function: Policy-oriented urban indicators database for :

9. Research,

10. Policy formulation,

11. Monitoring of the development impact of interventions in the urban sector,

12. Comparison of performance between cities, and

13. Improving the efficiency of urban service delivery

14. Framework: Policy-driven

17. HIERARCHY: 5 Very High 4 High 3 Medium 2 Low 1 Very Low JUDGMENT INDICATORS

18. JUDGMENT INDICATORS

19. INDICATORS SELECTED

20. INDICATORS SELECTED

21. INDICATORS SELECTED

23. Some Indicators do not have much meaning for measuring governance in case of HCM city such as: Voter by sex, contact with the public. => Each city need a suitable set of indicators.

24. Having a fresh view of governance.

25. Comprehensively understanding the characteristics of the given indicators (Validity, Reliability, Representativeness).CONCLUSION

26. This is the last slide! Thanks for your attention.