Numbers tell stories. What is required would be the derivation of the appropriate relationships. Thus the universe is designed to flux. And humans are wired to counter the flux, to match and thereafter transcend it. To the extent that this is achieved, is measured as the human momentum, MmT. Formally, for MmT = MmT’:

1. AGAPE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:
THE FIVE MATHEMATICAL MOTIFS
By
Peter Anyebe
ABSTRACT
Numbers tell stories.
What is required would be the derivation of the appropriate relationships.
Thus the universe is designed to flux. And humans are wired to counter the flux, to
match and thereafter transcend it. To the extent that this is achieved, is measured as the
human momentum, MmT. Formally, for MmT = MmT’:
MmT = √(10((EnG x StG’) ÷ (f0J ÷ SkG)))
If MmT > 1 Then
MmT = 0.5 ÷ MmT - 0.25
Else
MmT = 1 - MmT
End If
MmT’ = √(10((EnG x StG’) x (SkG ÷ f0J)))
If MmT’ > 1 Then
MmT’ = 0.5 ÷ MmT’ - 0.25
Else
MmT’ = 1 – MmT’
End If
Humans start out pure and faultless as children, represented by objectivity, ObJ. With
upbringing however, they are adulterated in the form of subjectivity, SbJ that some
people become committed to reverse later in life. Formally:
SbJ' = √((ObJ x SbJ) ÷ (ObJ ÷ SbJ)): ScT...........................(2a)
SbJ' = √((SbJ x ObJ) x (SbJ ÷ ObJ)): CsC...........................(2b)
Agape Consultants
8, De-Bangler Street
Gboko, Nigeria
+234(0)703-430-2486
anyebepeter@yahoo.com

2. Sample input data:
SbJ = 0.87
ObJ = SbJ^9 (0.29)
Notice that the momentum models presented earlier are specific forms of these latter
relations. And that each of the four, 4 relations has two, 2 parts, connected by either a
division or multiplication sign. By these relations, one could choose to be either
objective or subjective; according to whether the symbol that connects the two, 2 halves
of both relations is a division or multiplication, or which of ObJ or SbJ is the mantissa
in the second, 2nd half of both relations. In the relations presented below, the progress
toward objectivity is measured.
In this story subjectivity is commonly referred to as sin, SbJ and redemption, ObJ as
objectivity. Then to the extent that redemption has been successful, subjectivity would
be swallowed up. Formally:
ObJ' = IdT / √2 = 0.51,
IdT = ½(SbJ + ObJ)........(1a)
Sample input data:
SbJ = 0.93
ObJ = SbJ^9 (0.52)
As exemplified below:
HdT' = IdT/√2,
IdT = 1/2(HdT + UpG),
UpG = f0F..............(1b)
Sample input data:
HdT = 0.48
UpG = 0.87
The story is illustrated by another story of someone who tested Socrates, for
intelligence. He had a live bird in his hand, which he hid at his back and asked Socrates
to tell whether the bird was alive or dead. Socrates saw through the gimmick, to
respond that the answer was whatever the person wanted it to be. Socrates understood
that if he said the bird was dead, the person would produce it alive. And if he said the
bird was alive, the person would simply squeeze it to death. In both cases Socrates
would be wrong and the person, right. But this is only because the bird starts out alive.

3. If the bird started out dead, both Socrates and the person would be even. Socrates
would either make the right choice, to say that the bird is dead and the person loses; or
the wrong choice, to say that the bird is alive and the person wins the argument.
Thus the choice of objectivity matches the flux that characterizes the universe, at ObJ
= 0.5. This means that although humans start out pure like the live bird, at the point at
which the choice is made to reverse subjectivity, they would be impure, like the dead
bird.
For transcendence however, the human variability, VRT has to be minimized,
according to the approximation of the fine structure constant, α. This would be evident
in the measure of world view, Wv? by which expectations, A1 are transformed, to derive
reality, A2. Formally, where F = VRT and L = ?:
A2 = ((F2 (L1 ÷ F1) ÷ L2) A1.......................(4)
The convoluted structure of this model reconstructs the character of motion and
therefore growth in the universe, both of which would be coils and convoluted, always
at an angle rather than follow a straight course. Then transcendence would be a
doubling, for MmT = √0.5 = 0.71. And what is transmitted and received in the process
of growth and motion would be energy, of the type at zero-point; located in the
universe within the magnetic field, which magnetic field is also within the electrical
field. With humans the energy is released optimally at thought, f0 by causal interaction,
CI during worship, WsP. Formally, for WsP = CI:
SkG = 1/10 (f0J × ?): ? = CI or WsP...............(3)
CI = DT × CsY3: CI → 1
WsP = LnG × DtH2: WsP → 0
Given the relation by which the skill gap, SkG is evaluated therefore, either of WsP or
CI could be slotted where the question mark, ? is located. Then for the consistency,
CsY that characterizes the decision to reverse the adulteration at upbringing, it would
suffice that WsP = CI. In this case reversal means the approximation of the natural
order, N-O as evident in discretization, DT as well as a world view that matches the
factor-F and is observed in the equality of reality or value, A2 and expectation or
appreciation, A1 in the convolution equation-4. Then engagement, EnG and its inverse
skill shortage, StG would predict value creation and productivity, ROI. Formally:
Recall that humans acquired death,
DtH at Eden and lost language, LnG
at Babel, both of which would have
been recovered, for CI at worship

4. ROI = ROIApp × 41
ROIApp = 10(EnG × StG).......(5)
The return on investment, ROI is
actually a measure of growth in
terms of momentum, as the
product of mass, EnG and
velocity, StG where engagement
and objectivity, as well as the skill
shortage and the skill gap refer to
equivalents, like worship and
causal interaction. Specifically it is
angular momentum that is
measured. So that mass is
evaluated in terms of moments of
inertia and velocity is angular.
This measures energy at the subconscious level, which would be equivalent to the
zero-point or dark energy in vacuums and the calm at the center of whirls.
Recall that learning is an all-or-none event. This means that a few cases would suffice,
in terms of the required data to establish these conceptions. Moreover in a typical
simulation where principles are reconstructed, it would be sufficient that one, 1
subject fits the requirements for consistency, and that all the other subjects consistently
deviate from these standards. Notice that the following equalities are satisfied by the
first, 1st subject in all three, 3 tables presented above:
While the first, 1st five, 5 equalities are unique to objectivity, the sixth, 6th is common
to all subjects whether objective or subjective. These equalities are corroborated by the
following limits of optimality:
The kernel metrics that define humans are presented to the right