This presentation describes preliminary results of my dissertation research exploring how students learn using informal Internet resources individually. It also explores the sharing of these resources for collaborative learning.
3. Wealth of free resources available
@regcollins #aln14
Millennials turn to the Internet as their
first source of both educational and
personal information.
Connaway et al., 2008
4. • Internet resources make knowledge available to all
• Actually part of a complex system that includes:
Learner characteristics
Digital environment
Pedagogical activities
@regcollins #aln14
Learner
characteristics
ICT system
Pedagogical activity
5. • Bloom’s Taxonomy of Cognitive Learning Outcomes
• National Research Council’s 21st Century Competencies
• Nonaka & Takeuchi’s SECI Model of Knowledge Creation
• Social Capital and Knowledge Capital
@regcollins #aln14
9. @regcollins #aln14
Self-efficacy
(Pintrich & De Groot, 1990)
Intellectual
openness, work
ethic, and positive
core self-evaluation
GPA
Gender
Learning goal orientation
(Yi & Hwang, 2003)
Task value
(Joo et al., 2013)
Degree program
Familiarity with topic
Familiarity with
technology
10. @regcollins #aln14
Perceptions of learner-learner
interactions
(Benbunan-Fich & Arbaugh, 2005)
Teamwork and
collaboration, and
leadership
Previous sharing experience
Social capital
Intellectual capital
Learner interactions
11. @regcollins #aln14
Social network = Links from people to other people, groups,
or information objects (White, 2011)
Social Capital can develop in learning communities through
interactions (Daniel et al., 2002)
Sum of an individual’s connections
plus
Value in those connections
equals
Social Capital
Bourdieu & Wacquant, 1992; Nahapiet & Ghoshal, 1998
15. @regcollins #aln14
RQ1. Do the activities of sharing and consolidating
information resources improve individual learning and the
quality of group deliverables?
RQ2. Do the activities of resource management improve
individual learning and the quality of group deliverables?
RQ3. Do the results vary according to student characteristics
such as educational level or gender?
RQ4. Is there any difference in learning outcomes when using
a traditional LMS or a web-based digital curation service?
RQ5. What theoretical model best describes learning by using
and sharing Internet resources?
RQ6. What pedagogical activities best support sharing and
managing Internet resources for learning?
16. @regcollins #aln14
Systems Analysis and Design – IS 390
Explore the TJ Maxx and more recent Target security
breaches
Database Management – IS 331
Select one of several topics not covered in class
(e.g. cloud computing, data warehouse) to
gain an understanding
Women in Technology (ongoing) – STS 342
Identify exemplars of short films on YouTube dealing
with gender issues and use these exemplars to create
a short film
17. @regcollins #aln14
Advanced Systems Analysis and Design – IS 663
Expand on the concept of Object Oriented Modeling
covered in class and create a class diagram
Information Systems Principles – IS 677
Two assignments:
1. Evaluate the information systems approaches of
companies discussed in the textbook
2. Analyze a case study based on a relevant article
Information Systems Strategy – IS 679
Two assignments:
1. Apply cross-cultural information systems knowledge
to global organizations
2. Analyze a case study based on a relevant article
18. @regcollins #aln14
Learning Outcome Question
Comprehension Describe TJX’s business model and business strategy.
Application Relate TJX’s business strategy to its IT strategy.
Analysis Compare TJX’s response to the security breach with that of
Target. How are they different? How are they the same?
Synthesis What common elements (if any) existed between TJX’s
business and IT strategies and those of Target?
Evaluation Which company do you think responded better to the
security breach? Justify your answer.
19. @regcollins #aln14
Demographics Count
Gender M = 76 (69.1%)
F = 34 (30.9%)
Level of study Undergraduate = 45 (40.9%)
Graduate = 65 (59.1%)
English is first language No = 56 (50.9%)
Yes = 54 (49.1%)
Share Internet resources for
learning before
No = 29 (26.4%)
Yes = 81 (73.6%)
Assigned System Moodle = 57 (51.8%)
Pearltrees = 53 (48.2%)
20. @regcollins #aln14
GPA Count
2.0 to 2.99 11 (12.5%)
3.0 to 3.49 15 (17%)
3.5 to 3.79 24 (27.3%)
3.8 to 3.99 16 (18.2%)
4.0 22 (25.0%)
21. @regcollins #aln14
Group responses scored higher than individual responses
Mean (individual) = 83.80
Mean (group) = 91.67
t = 3.401, p = 0.001
No differences by gender
Group grades of graduate students differed from those of
undergraduates
(Could be result of differences
in instructor scoring)
Results suggest sharing
Internet resources as part
of a discussion of
individual knowledge with a
group improves learning
outcomes.
23. @regcollins #aln14
Dependent Variable = Perceived Learning
F = 21.727, p = 0.000
Adjusted R2 = 0.605
Significant predictors
• Quantity of Social Capital (β = 1.048, p=0.000)
• Task Value (β = 0.306, p=0.039)
• System Satisfaction (β = 0.179, p=0.001)
24. @regcollins #aln14
Applying Social Network Analysis to networks of
Student x Cited Resources
1. Is there any difference in learning outcome based on
uniqueness of resources (exclusivity)?
2. Is there any difference in learning outcome based on
students who provided the resources cited in the group
submission (in-degree centrality)?
3. Is there any difference in learning outcome based on how
much students refined their cited sources in the group
submission?
26. @regcollins #aln14
For courses analyzed thus far, in-degree centrality is
associated with individual assignment grade, suggesting that
Students whose resources are
cited by the group tend to have
done better on the individual
assignment.*
* However, data from only two courses has been completely analyzed
thus far.