SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  41
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Natural Language Checking
with Program Checking Tools
Fabrizio Perin, Lukas Renggli, Jorge Ressia
SyntaxStyle
Programming
Languages
Parser
Compiler
Program
Checker
Parser
Compiler
SyntaxStyle
Programming
Languages
Program
Checker
Parser
Compiler
SyntaxStyle
Programming
Languages
Natural
Languages
Program
Checker
Parser
Compiler
Spell Checker
Grammar
Checker
SyntaxStyle
Programming
Languages
Natural
Languages
Program
Checker
TextLint
Parser
Compiler
Spell Checker
Grammar
Checker
SyntaxStyle
Programming
Languages
Natural
Languages
(2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in
Smalltalk;
(3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in
natural language; and
(4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the
problems detected by the tool.
Text Parsing Model Validation Failures
Rules Styles
GUI
Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint.
Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces
the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents
are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which
model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in
(2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in
Smalltalk;
(3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in
natural language; and
(4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the
problems detected by the tool.
Text Parsing Model Validation Failures
Rules Styles
GUI
Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint.
Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces
the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents
are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which
model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in
.txt
.html
.tex
(2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in
Smalltalk;
(3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in
natural language; and
(4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the
problems detected by the tool.
Text Parsing Model Validation Failures
Rules Styles
GUI
Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint.
Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces
the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents
are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which
model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in
(2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in
Smalltalk;
(3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in
natural language; and
(4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the
problems detected by the tool.
Text Parsing Model Validation Failures
Rules Styles
GUI
Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint.
Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces
the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents
are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which
model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in
· The Markup models LATEX or HTML commands depending on the filetype
of the input.
All document elements answer the message text which returns a plain string
representation of the modeled text entity ignoring markup tokens. Furthermore
all elements know their source interval in the document. The relationship among
the elements in the model are depicted in Figure 3.
Element
text()
interval()
Document Paragraph Sentence Phrase
1 * 1 * 1 *
SyntacticElement
text()
interval()
Word Punctuation Whitespace Markup
1
*
1
*
Fig. 3. The TextLint model and the relationships between its classes.
3 From Strings to Objects
To build the high-level document model from the flat input string we use
PetitParser [7]. PetitParser is a framework targeted at parsing formal languages
(e.g., programming languages), but we employ it in this project to parse natural
4
raries: For parsing natural languages we use PetitParser [7], a flexible
rsing framework that makes it easy to define parsers and to dynamically
use, compose, transform and extend grammars. Furthermore, we use Glamour
, an engine for scripting browsers. Glamour reifies the notion of a browser
d defines the flow of data between different user interface widgets.
he contributions of this paper are:
1) we apply ideas from program checking to the domain of natural language;
2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in
Smalltalk;
3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in
natural language; and
4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the
problems detected by the tool.
Text Parsing Model Validation Failures
Rules Styles
GUI
representation of the modeled text entity ignoring markup tokens. Furthermore
all elements know their source interval in the document. The relationship among
the elements in the model are depicted in Figure 3.
Element
text()
interval()
Document Paragraph Sentence Phrase
1 * 1 * 1 *
SyntacticElement
text()
interval()
Word Punctuation Whitespace Markup
1
*
1
*
Fig. 3. The TextLint model and the relationships between its classes.
raries: For parsing natural languages we use PetitParser [7], a flexible
rsing framework that makes it easy to define parsers and to dynamically
use, compose, transform and extend grammars. Furthermore, we use Glamour
, an engine for scripting browsers. Glamour reifies the notion of a browser
d defines the flow of data between different user interface widgets.
he contributions of this paper are:
1) we apply ideas from program checking to the domain of natural language;
2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in
Smalltalk;
3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in
natural language; and
4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the
problems detected by the tool.
Text Parsing Model Validation Failures
Rules Styles
GUI
representation of the modeled text entity ignoring markup tokens. Furthermore
all elements know their source interval in the document. The relationship among
the elements in the model are depicted in Figure 3.
Element
text()
interval()
Document Paragraph Sentence Phrase
1 * 1 * 1 *
SyntacticElement
text()
interval()
Word Punctuation Whitespace Markup
1
*
1
*
Fig. 3. The TextLint model and the relationships between its classes.
raries: For parsing natural languages we use PetitParser [7], a flexible
rsing framework that makes it easy to define parsers and to dynamically
use, compose, transform and extend grammars. Furthermore, we use Glamour
, an engine for scripting browsers. Glamour reifies the notion of a browser
d defines the flow of data between different user interface widgets.
he contributions of this paper are:
1) we apply ideas from program checking to the domain of natural language;
2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in
Smalltalk;
3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in
natural language; and
4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the
problems detected by the tool.
Text Parsing Model Validation Failures
Rules Styles
GUI
representation of the modeled text entity ignoring markup tokens. Furthermore
all elements know their source interval in the document. The relationship among
the elements in the model are depicted in Figure 3.
Element
text()
interval()
Document Paragraph Sentence Phrase
1 * 1 * 1 *
SyntacticElement
text()
interval()
Word Punctuation Whitespace Markup
1
*
1
*
Fig. 3. The TextLint model and the relationships between its classes.
Other Language Models
raries: For parsing natural languages we use PetitParser [7], a flexible
rsing framework that makes it easy to define parsers and to dynamically
use, compose, transform and extend grammars. Furthermore, we use Glamour
, an engine for scripting browsers. Glamour reifies the notion of a browser
d defines the flow of data between different user interface widgets.
he contributions of this paper are:
1) we apply ideas from program checking to the domain of natural language;
2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in
Smalltalk;
3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in
natural language; and
4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the
problems detected by the tool.
Text Parsing Model Validation Failures
Rules Styles
GUI
representation of the modeled text entity ignoring markup tokens. Furthermore
all elements know their source interval in the document. The relationship among
the elements in the model are depicted in Figure 3.
Element
text()
interval()
Document Paragraph Sentence Phrase
1 * 1 * 1 *
SyntacticElement
text()
interval()
Word Punctuation Whitespace Markup
1
*
1
*
Fig. 3. The TextLint model and the relationships between its classes.
(2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in
Smalltalk;
(3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in
natural language; and
(4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the
problems detected by the tool.
Text Parsing Model Validation Failures
Rules Styles
GUI
Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint.
Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces
the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents
are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which
model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in
(2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in
Smalltalk;
(3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in
natural language; and
(4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the
problems detected by the tool.
Text Parsing Model Validation Failures
Rules Styles
GUI
Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint.
Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces
the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents
are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which
model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in
Avoid "a lot"
Avoid "a"
Avoid "allow to"
Avoid "an"
Avoid "as to whether"
Avoid "can not"
Avoid "case"
Avoid "certainly"
Avoid "could"
Avoid "currently"
Avoid "different than"
Avoid "doubt but"
Avoid "each and every one"
Avoid "enormity"
Avoid "factor"
Avoid "funny"
Avoid "help but"
Avoid "help to"
Avoid "however"
Avoid "importantly"
Avoid "in order to"
Avoid "in regards to"
Avoid "in terms of"
Avoid "insightful"
Avoid "interesting"
Avoid "irregardless"
Avoid "one of the most"
Avoid "regarded as"
Avoid "required to"
Avoid "somehow"
Avoid "stuff"
Avoid "the fact is"
Avoid "the fact that"
Avoid "the truth is"
Avoid "thing"
Avoid "thus"
Avoid "true fact"
Avoid "would"
Avoid comma
Avoid connectors repetition
Avoid continuous punctuation
Avoid continuous word repetition
Avoid contraction
Avoid joined sentences
Avoid long paragraph
Avoid long sentence
Avoid passive voice
Avoid qualifier
Avoid whitespace
Avoid word repetition
raries: For parsing natural languages we use PetitParser [7], a flexible
rsing framework that makes it easy to define parsers and to dynamically
use, compose, transform and extend grammars. Furthermore, we use Glamour
, an engine for scripting browsers. Glamour reifies the notion of a browser
d defines the flow of data between different user interface widgets.
he contributions of this paper are:
1) we apply ideas from program checking to the domain of natural language;
2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in
Smalltalk;
3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in
natural language; and
4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the
problems detected by the tool.
Text Parsing Model Validation Failures
Rules Styles
GUI
Avoid "a lot"
Avoid "a"
Avoid "allow to"
Avoid "an"
Avoid "as to whether"
Avoid "can not"
Avoid "case"
Avoid "certainly"
Avoid "could"
Avoid "currently"
Avoid "different than"
Avoid "doubt but"
Avoid "each and every one"
Avoid "enormity"
Avoid "factor"
Avoid "funny"
Avoid "help but"
Avoid "help to"
Avoid "however"
Avoid "importantly"
Avoid "in order to"
Avoid "in regards to"
Avoid "in terms of"
Avoid "insightful"
Avoid "interesting"
Avoid "irregardless"
Avoid "one of the most"
Avoid "regarded as"
Avoid "required to"
Avoid "somehow"
Avoid "stuff"
Avoid "the fact is"
Avoid "the fact that"
Avoid "the truth is"
Avoid "thing"
Avoid "thus"
Avoid "true fact"
Avoid "would"
Avoid comma
Avoid connectors repetition
Avoid continuous punctuation
Avoid continuous word repetition
Avoid contraction
Avoid joined sentences
Avoid long paragraph
Avoid long sentence
Avoid passive voice
Avoid qualifier
Avoid whitespace
Avoid word repetition
raries: For parsing natural languages we use PetitParser [7], a flexible
rsing framework that makes it easy to define parsers and to dynamically
use, compose, transform and extend grammars. Furthermore, we use Glamour
, an engine for scripting browsers. Glamour reifies the notion of a browser
d defines the flow of data between different user interface widgets.
he contributions of this paper are:
1) we apply ideas from program checking to the domain of natural language;
2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in
Smalltalk;
3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in
natural language; and
4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the
problems detected by the tool.
Text Parsing Model Validation Failures
Rules Styles
GUI
(self	
  word:	
  ‘somehow’)
Avoid "a lot"
Avoid "a"
Avoid "allow to"
Avoid "an"
Avoid "as to whether"
Avoid "can not"
Avoid "case"
Avoid "certainly"
Avoid "could"
Avoid "currently"
Avoid "different than"
Avoid "doubt but"
Avoid "each and every one"
Avoid "enormity"
Avoid "factor"
Avoid "funny"
Avoid "help but"
Avoid "help to"
Avoid "however"
Avoid "importantly"
Avoid "in order to"
Avoid "in regards to"
Avoid "in terms of"
Avoid "insightful"
Avoid "interesting"
Avoid "irregardless"
Avoid "one of the most"
Avoid "regarded as"
Avoid "required to"
Avoid "somehow"
Avoid "stuff"
Avoid "the fact is"
Avoid "the fact that"
Avoid "the truth is"
Avoid "thing"
Avoid "thus"
Avoid "true fact"
Avoid "would"
Avoid comma
Avoid connectors repetition
Avoid continuous punctuation
Avoid continuous word repetition
Avoid contraction
Avoid joined sentences
Avoid long paragraph
Avoid long sentence
Avoid passive voice
Avoid qualifier
Avoid whitespace
Avoid word repetition
raries: For parsing natural languages we use PetitParser [7], a flexible
rsing framework that makes it easy to define parsers and to dynamically
use, compose, transform and extend grammars. Furthermore, we use Glamour
, an engine for scripting browsers. Glamour reifies the notion of a browser
d defines the flow of data between different user interface widgets.
he contributions of this paper are:
1) we apply ideas from program checking to the domain of natural language;
2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in
Smalltalk;
3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in
natural language; and
4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the
problems detected by the tool.
Text Parsing Model Validation Failures
Rules Styles
GUI
(self	
  punctuation)	
  ,	
  (self	
  punctuation)
Avoid "a lot"
Avoid "a"
Avoid "allow to"
Avoid "an"
Avoid "as to whether"
Avoid "can not"
Avoid "case"
Avoid "certainly"
Avoid "could"
Avoid "currently"
Avoid "different than"
Avoid "doubt but"
Avoid "each and every one"
Avoid "enormity"
Avoid "factor"
Avoid "funny"
Avoid "help but"
Avoid "help to"
Avoid "however"
Avoid "importantly"
Avoid "in order to"
Avoid "in regards to"
Avoid "in terms of"
Avoid "insightful"
Avoid "interesting"
Avoid "irregardless"
Avoid "one of the most"
Avoid "regarded as"
Avoid "required to"
Avoid "somehow"
Avoid "stuff"
Avoid "the fact is"
Avoid "the fact that"
Avoid "the truth is"
Avoid "thing"
Avoid "thus"
Avoid "true fact"
Avoid "would"
Avoid comma
Avoid connectors repetition
Avoid continuous punctuation
Avoid continuous word repetition
Avoid contraction
Avoid joined sentences
Avoid long paragraph
Avoid long sentence
Avoid passive voice
Avoid qualifier
Avoid whitespace
Avoid word repetition
raries: For parsing natural languages we use PetitParser [7], a flexible
rsing framework that makes it easy to define parsers and to dynamically
use, compose, transform and extend grammars. Furthermore, we use Glamour
, an engine for scripting browsers. Glamour reifies the notion of a browser
d defines the flow of data between different user interface widgets.
he contributions of this paper are:
1) we apply ideas from program checking to the domain of natural language;
2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in
Smalltalk;
3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in
natural language; and
4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the
problems detected by the tool.
Text Parsing Model Validation Failures
Rules Styles
GUI
(self	
  wordIn:	
  #('am'	
  'are'	
  'were'	
  'being'	
  ...	
  ))	
  ,	
  
(self	
  separator	
  star)	
  ,	
  
((self	
  wordSatisfying:	
  [	
  :value	
  |	
  value	
  endsWith:	
  'ed'	
  ])	
  /	
  
	
  (self	
  wordIn:	
  #('awoken'	
  'been'	
  'born'	
  'beat'	
  ...	
  )))
(2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in
Smalltalk;
(3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in
natural language; and
(4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the
problems detected by the tool.
Text Parsing Model Validation Failures
Rules Styles
GUI
Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint.
Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces
the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents
are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which
model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in
(2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in
Smalltalk;
(3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in
natural language; and
(4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the
problems detected by the tool.
Text Parsing Model Validation Failures
Rules Styles
GUI
Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint.
Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces
the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents
are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which
model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in
scientificPaperStyle	
  :=	
  TLTextLintRule	
  allRules
-­‐	
  TLWordRepetitionInParagraphRule
(2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in
Smalltalk;
(3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in
natural language; and
(4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the
problems detected by the tool.
Text Parsing Model Validation Failures
Rules Styles
GUI
Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint.
Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces
the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents
are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which
model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in
(2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in
Smalltalk;
(3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in
natural language; and
(4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the
problems detected by the tool.
Text Parsing Model Validation Failures
Rules Styles
GUI
Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint.
Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces
the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents
are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which
model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in
(2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in
Smalltalk;
(3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in
natural language; and
(4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the
problems detected by the tool.
Text Parsing Model Validation Failures
Rules Styles
GUI
Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint.
Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces
the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents
are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which
model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in
raries: For parsing natural languages we use PetitParser [7], a flexible
rsing framework that makes it easy to define parsers and to dynamically
use, compose, transform and extend grammars. Furthermore, we use Glamour
, an engine for scripting browsers. Glamour reifies the notion of a browser
d defines the flow of data between different user interface widgets.
he contributions of this paper are:
1) we apply ideas from program checking to the domain of natural language;
2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in
Smalltalk;
3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in
natural language; and
4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the
problems detected by the tool.
Text Parsing Model Validation Failures
Rules Styles
GUI
raries: For parsing natural languages we use PetitParser [7], a flexible
rsing framework that makes it easy to define parsers and to dynamically
use, compose, transform and extend grammars. Furthermore, we use Glamour
, an engine for scripting browsers. Glamour reifies the notion of a browser
d defines the flow of data between different user interface widgets.
he contributions of this paper are:
1) we apply ideas from program checking to the domain of natural language;
2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in
Smalltalk;
3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in
natural language; and
4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the
problems detected by the tool.
Text Parsing Model Validation Failures
Rules Styles
GUI
Validation
t
t1 t2 t3 t4
Issues
Words
Fig. 6. Evolution of a paper from beginning to publication.
7.1 History of a Paper
Avoid‘currently’-74%
Avoid‘certainly’-25%
Avoid‘would’-24%
Avoid‘factor’-20%
Avoidlongparagraph-20%
Avoid‘thus’-13%
Avoid‘however’-10%
Avoid‘case’-7%
Avoid‘cannot’-5%
Avoid‘could’-5%
Avoidpassivevoice-4%
Avoid‘insightful’-3%
Avoid‘stuff’-3%
Avoidjoinedsentences-1%
Avoid‘astowhether’0%
Avoid‘differentthan’0%
Avoid‘doubtbut’0%
Avoid‘eachandeveryone’0%
Avoid‘enormity’0%
Avoid‘helpbut’0%
Avoid‘inregardsto’0%
Avoid‘irregardless’0%
Avoid‘regardedas’0%
Avoid‘thefactis’0%
Avoid‘thetruthis’0%
Avoid‘truefact’0%
Avoidcomma0%
Avoidqualifier2%
Avoid‘funny’5%
Avoid‘oneofthemost’5%
Avoid‘importantly’9%
Avoidlongsentence10%
Avoid‘an’10%
Avoidcontinuouspunctuation15%
Avoid‘interesting’17%
Avoid‘requiredto’17%
Avoid‘a’23%
Avoid‘inorderto’23%
Avoidcontinuouswordrepetition24%
Avoid‘intermsof’24%
Avoid‘somehow’25%
Avoid‘helpto’27%
Avoid‘thefactthat’32%
Avoidwhitespace45%
Avoid‘allowto’46%
Avoid‘alot’55%
Avoid‘thing’70%
Avoidcontraction73%
Fig.7.EffectivenessofvariousTextLintrules.
amorein-depthdiscussionoftoolsthatcommentonwritingstylecouldbeincluded.
Future Work
‣ Natural Language Model
‣ Styles for Other Domains
‣ More Rules
textlint.lukas-renggli.ch
@textlint

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Sentence Validation by Statistical Language Modeling and Semantic Relations
Sentence Validation by Statistical Language Modeling and Semantic RelationsSentence Validation by Statistical Language Modeling and Semantic Relations
Sentence Validation by Statistical Language Modeling and Semantic Relations
Editor IJCATR
 
NLP_Project_Paper_up276_vec241
NLP_Project_Paper_up276_vec241NLP_Project_Paper_up276_vec241
NLP_Project_Paper_up276_vec241
Urjit Patel
 
58903240-SentiMatrix-Multilingual-Sentiment-Analysis-Service
58903240-SentiMatrix-Multilingual-Sentiment-Analysis-Service58903240-SentiMatrix-Multilingual-Sentiment-Analysis-Service
58903240-SentiMatrix-Multilingual-Sentiment-Analysis-Service
Marius Corici
 

Tendances (19)

IRJET- Short-Text Semantic Similarity using Glove Word Embedding
IRJET- Short-Text Semantic Similarity using Glove Word EmbeddingIRJET- Short-Text Semantic Similarity using Glove Word Embedding
IRJET- Short-Text Semantic Similarity using Glove Word Embedding
 
I1 geetha3 revathi
I1 geetha3 revathiI1 geetha3 revathi
I1 geetha3 revathi
 
STOCKGRAM : DEEP LEARNING MODEL FOR DIGITIZING FINANCIAL COMMUNICATIONS VIA N...
STOCKGRAM : DEEP LEARNING MODEL FOR DIGITIZING FINANCIAL COMMUNICATIONS VIA N...STOCKGRAM : DEEP LEARNING MODEL FOR DIGITIZING FINANCIAL COMMUNICATIONS VIA N...
STOCKGRAM : DEEP LEARNING MODEL FOR DIGITIZING FINANCIAL COMMUNICATIONS VIA N...
 
STOCKGRAM : DEEP LEARNING MODEL FOR DIGITIZING FINANCIAL COMMUNICATIONS VIA N...
STOCKGRAM : DEEP LEARNING MODEL FOR DIGITIZING FINANCIAL COMMUNICATIONS VIA N...STOCKGRAM : DEEP LEARNING MODEL FOR DIGITIZING FINANCIAL COMMUNICATIONS VIA N...
STOCKGRAM : DEEP LEARNING MODEL FOR DIGITIZING FINANCIAL COMMUNICATIONS VIA N...
 
Sentence Validation by Statistical Language Modeling and Semantic Relations
Sentence Validation by Statistical Language Modeling and Semantic RelationsSentence Validation by Statistical Language Modeling and Semantic Relations
Sentence Validation by Statistical Language Modeling and Semantic Relations
 
Cross language information retrieval in indian
Cross language information retrieval in indianCross language information retrieval in indian
Cross language information retrieval in indian
 
GENERIC CODE CLONING METHOD FOR DETECTION OF CLONE CODE IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
GENERIC CODE CLONING METHOD FOR DETECTION OF CLONE CODE IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT GENERIC CODE CLONING METHOD FOR DETECTION OF CLONE CODE IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
GENERIC CODE CLONING METHOD FOR DETECTION OF CLONE CODE IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
 
Chunking in manipuri using crf
Chunking in manipuri using crfChunking in manipuri using crf
Chunking in manipuri using crf
 
An Approach To Automatic Text Summarization Using Simplified Lesk Algorithm A...
An Approach To Automatic Text Summarization Using Simplified Lesk Algorithm A...An Approach To Automatic Text Summarization Using Simplified Lesk Algorithm A...
An Approach To Automatic Text Summarization Using Simplified Lesk Algorithm A...
 
A NOVEL APPROACH FOR WORD RETRIEVAL FROM DEVANAGARI DOCUMENT IMAGES
A NOVEL APPROACH FOR WORD RETRIEVAL FROM DEVANAGARI DOCUMENT IMAGESA NOVEL APPROACH FOR WORD RETRIEVAL FROM DEVANAGARI DOCUMENT IMAGES
A NOVEL APPROACH FOR WORD RETRIEVAL FROM DEVANAGARI DOCUMENT IMAGES
 
NLP_Project_Paper_up276_vec241
NLP_Project_Paper_up276_vec241NLP_Project_Paper_up276_vec241
NLP_Project_Paper_up276_vec241
 
Dot net programming concept
Dot net  programming conceptDot net  programming concept
Dot net programming concept
 
Oop
OopOop
Oop
 
AMBIGUITY-AWARE DOCUMENT SIMILARITY
AMBIGUITY-AWARE DOCUMENT SIMILARITYAMBIGUITY-AWARE DOCUMENT SIMILARITY
AMBIGUITY-AWARE DOCUMENT SIMILARITY
 
Chapter1
Chapter1Chapter1
Chapter1
 
Proposed Method for String Transformation using Probablistic Approach
Proposed Method for String Transformation using Probablistic ApproachProposed Method for String Transformation using Probablistic Approach
Proposed Method for String Transformation using Probablistic Approach
 
An approach to source code plagiarism
An approach to source code plagiarismAn approach to source code plagiarism
An approach to source code plagiarism
 
58903240-SentiMatrix-Multilingual-Sentiment-Analysis-Service
58903240-SentiMatrix-Multilingual-Sentiment-Analysis-Service58903240-SentiMatrix-Multilingual-Sentiment-Analysis-Service
58903240-SentiMatrix-Multilingual-Sentiment-Analysis-Service
 
A Novel Approach for Rule Based Translation of English to Marathi
A Novel Approach for Rule Based Translation of English to MarathiA Novel Approach for Rule Based Translation of English to Marathi
A Novel Approach for Rule Based Translation of English to Marathi
 

En vedette

TIP_E-Conversion_System
TIP_E-Conversion_SystemTIP_E-Conversion_System
TIP_E-Conversion_System
Rana Saini
 
Presen_Segmentation
Presen_SegmentationPresen_Segmentation
Presen_Segmentation
Vikas Goyal
 
Devanagari Character Recognition
Devanagari Character RecognitionDevanagari Character Recognition
Devanagari Character Recognition
Pulkit Goyal
 

En vedette (7)

TIP_E-Conversion_System
TIP_E-Conversion_SystemTIP_E-Conversion_System
TIP_E-Conversion_System
 
Presen_Segmentation
Presen_SegmentationPresen_Segmentation
Presen_Segmentation
 
Gui in matlab :
Gui in matlab :Gui in matlab :
Gui in matlab :
 
Text detection and recognition from natural scenes
Text detection and recognition from natural scenesText detection and recognition from natural scenes
Text detection and recognition from natural scenes
 
Error control coding
Error control codingError control coding
Error control coding
 
Devanagari Character Recognition
Devanagari Character RecognitionDevanagari Character Recognition
Devanagari Character Recognition
 
GUI in Matlab - 1
GUI in Matlab - 1GUI in Matlab - 1
GUI in Matlab - 1
 

Similaire à Natural Language Checking with Program Checking Tools

semantic text doc clustering
semantic text doc clusteringsemantic text doc clustering
semantic text doc clustering
Souvik Roy
 
Towards From Manual to Automatic Semantic Annotation: Based on Ontology Eleme...
Towards From Manual to Automatic Semantic Annotation: Based on Ontology Eleme...Towards From Manual to Automatic Semantic Annotation: Based on Ontology Eleme...
Towards From Manual to Automatic Semantic Annotation: Based on Ontology Eleme...
IJwest
 
SURE Research Report
SURE Research ReportSURE Research Report
SURE Research Report
Alex Sumner
 

Similaire à Natural Language Checking with Program Checking Tools (20)

Robust Text Watermarking Technique for Authorship Protection of Hindi Languag...
Robust Text Watermarking Technique for Authorship Protection of Hindi Languag...Robust Text Watermarking Technique for Authorship Protection of Hindi Languag...
Robust Text Watermarking Technique for Authorship Protection of Hindi Languag...
 
IRJET- A Pragmatic Supervised Learning Methodology of Hate Speech Detection i...
IRJET- A Pragmatic Supervised Learning Methodology of Hate Speech Detection i...IRJET- A Pragmatic Supervised Learning Methodology of Hate Speech Detection i...
IRJET- A Pragmatic Supervised Learning Methodology of Hate Speech Detection i...
 
PSEUDOCODE TO SOURCE PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE TRANSLATOR
PSEUDOCODE TO SOURCE PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE TRANSLATORPSEUDOCODE TO SOURCE PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE TRANSLATOR
PSEUDOCODE TO SOURCE PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE TRANSLATOR
 
FEATURES MATCHING USING NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING
FEATURES MATCHING USING NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSINGFEATURES MATCHING USING NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING
FEATURES MATCHING USING NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING
 
PYFML- A TEXTUAL LANGUAGE FOR FEATURE MODELING
PYFML- A TEXTUAL LANGUAGE FOR FEATURE MODELINGPYFML- A TEXTUAL LANGUAGE FOR FEATURE MODELING
PYFML- A TEXTUAL LANGUAGE FOR FEATURE MODELING
 
semantic text doc clustering
semantic text doc clusteringsemantic text doc clustering
semantic text doc clustering
 
Towards From Manual to Automatic Semantic Annotation: Based on Ontology Eleme...
Towards From Manual to Automatic Semantic Annotation: Based on Ontology Eleme...Towards From Manual to Automatic Semantic Annotation: Based on Ontology Eleme...
Towards From Manual to Automatic Semantic Annotation: Based on Ontology Eleme...
 
A FILM SYNOPSIS GENRE CLASSIFIER BASED ON MAJORITY VOTE
A FILM SYNOPSIS GENRE CLASSIFIER BASED ON MAJORITY VOTEA FILM SYNOPSIS GENRE CLASSIFIER BASED ON MAJORITY VOTE
A FILM SYNOPSIS GENRE CLASSIFIER BASED ON MAJORITY VOTE
 
SURE Research Report
SURE Research ReportSURE Research Report
SURE Research Report
 
Go f designpatterns 130116024923-phpapp02
Go f designpatterns 130116024923-phpapp02Go f designpatterns 130116024923-phpapp02
Go f designpatterns 130116024923-phpapp02
 
A018110108
A018110108A018110108
A018110108
 
SOFTWARE TOOL FOR TRANSLATING PSEUDOCODE TO A PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE
SOFTWARE TOOL FOR TRANSLATING PSEUDOCODE TO A PROGRAMMING LANGUAGESOFTWARE TOOL FOR TRANSLATING PSEUDOCODE TO A PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE
SOFTWARE TOOL FOR TRANSLATING PSEUDOCODE TO A PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE
 
SOFTWARE TOOL FOR TRANSLATING PSEUDOCODE TO A PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE
SOFTWARE TOOL FOR TRANSLATING PSEUDOCODE TO A PROGRAMMING LANGUAGESOFTWARE TOOL FOR TRANSLATING PSEUDOCODE TO A PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE
SOFTWARE TOOL FOR TRANSLATING PSEUDOCODE TO A PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE
 
A FILM SYNOPSIS GENRE CLASSIFIER BASED ON MAJORITY VOTE
A FILM SYNOPSIS GENRE CLASSIFIER BASED ON MAJORITY VOTEA FILM SYNOPSIS GENRE CLASSIFIER BASED ON MAJORITY VOTE
A FILM SYNOPSIS GENRE CLASSIFIER BASED ON MAJORITY VOTE
 
A Novel Approach for Rule Based Translation of English to Marathi
A Novel Approach for Rule Based Translation of English to MarathiA Novel Approach for Rule Based Translation of English to Marathi
A Novel Approach for Rule Based Translation of English to Marathi
 
A Novel Approach for Rule Based Translation of English to Marathi
A Novel Approach for Rule Based Translation of English to MarathiA Novel Approach for Rule Based Translation of English to Marathi
A Novel Approach for Rule Based Translation of English to Marathi
 
Automatic Labeling of the Object-oriented Source Code: The Lotus Approach
Automatic Labeling of the Object-oriented Source Code: The Lotus ApproachAutomatic Labeling of the Object-oriented Source Code: The Lotus Approach
Automatic Labeling of the Object-oriented Source Code: The Lotus Approach
 
Compiler Design Using Context-Free Grammar
Compiler Design Using Context-Free GrammarCompiler Design Using Context-Free Grammar
Compiler Design Using Context-Free Grammar
 
7.type system
7.type system7.type system
7.type system
 
Pattern-Level Programming with Asteroid
Pattern-Level Programming with AsteroidPattern-Level Programming with Asteroid
Pattern-Level Programming with Asteroid
 

Plus de Lukas Renggli

Dynamic Language Embedding With Homogeneous Tool Support
Dynamic Language Embedding With Homogeneous Tool SupportDynamic Language Embedding With Homogeneous Tool Support
Dynamic Language Embedding With Homogeneous Tool Support
Lukas Renggli
 
Seaside — Agile Software Development
Seaside — Agile Software DevelopmentSeaside — Agile Software Development
Seaside — Agile Software Development
Lukas Renggli
 
Seaside Status Message
Seaside Status MessageSeaside Status Message
Seaside Status Message
Lukas Renggli
 

Plus de Lukas Renggli (19)

Mastering Grammars with PetitParser
Mastering Grammars with PetitParserMastering Grammars with PetitParser
Mastering Grammars with PetitParser
 
The Dynamic Language is not Enough
The Dynamic Language is not EnoughThe Dynamic Language is not Enough
The Dynamic Language is not Enough
 
Dynamic Language Embedding With Homogeneous Tool Support
Dynamic Language Embedding With Homogeneous Tool SupportDynamic Language Embedding With Homogeneous Tool Support
Dynamic Language Embedding With Homogeneous Tool Support
 
Seaside — Agile Software Development
Seaside — Agile Software DevelopmentSeaside — Agile Software Development
Seaside — Agile Software Development
 
Dynamic grammars
Dynamic grammarsDynamic grammars
Dynamic grammars
 
Domain-Specific Program Checking
Domain-Specific Program CheckingDomain-Specific Program Checking
Domain-Specific Program Checking
 
Embedding Languages Without Breaking Tools
Embedding Languages Without Breaking ToolsEmbedding Languages Without Breaking Tools
Embedding Languages Without Breaking Tools
 
Language Boxes — Bending the Host Language with Modular Language Changes
Language Boxes — Bending the Host Language with Modular Language ChangesLanguage Boxes — Bending the Host Language with Modular Language Changes
Language Boxes — Bending the Host Language with Modular Language Changes
 
jQuery for Seaside
jQuery for SeasidejQuery for Seaside
jQuery for Seaside
 
Seaside Status Message
Seaside Status MessageSeaside Status Message
Seaside Status Message
 
Seaside - The Revenge of Smalltalk
Seaside - The Revenge of SmalltalkSeaside - The Revenge of Smalltalk
Seaside - The Revenge of Smalltalk
 
Magritte Blitz
Magritte BlitzMagritte Blitz
Magritte Blitz
 
Seaside - On not getting bogged down
Seaside - On not getting bogged downSeaside - On not getting bogged down
Seaside - On not getting bogged down
 
Magritte
MagritteMagritte
Magritte
 
Seaside - Past, Present and Future
Seaside - Past, Present and FutureSeaside - Past, Present and Future
Seaside - Past, Present and Future
 
Magritte - A Meta-Driven Approach to Empower Developers and End Users
Magritte - A Meta-Driven Approach to Empower Developers and End UsersMagritte - A Meta-Driven Approach to Empower Developers and End Users
Magritte - A Meta-Driven Approach to Empower Developers and End Users
 
Transactional Memory for Smalltalk
Transactional Memory for SmalltalkTransactional Memory for Smalltalk
Transactional Memory for Smalltalk
 
Seaside - Web Development As You Like It
Seaside - Web Development As You Like ItSeaside - Web Development As You Like It
Seaside - Web Development As You Like It
 
5 Steps to Mastering the Art of Seaside
5 Steps to Mastering the Art of Seaside5 Steps to Mastering the Art of Seaside
5 Steps to Mastering the Art of Seaside
 

Dernier

+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
?#DUbAI#??##{{(☎️+971_581248768%)**%*]'#abortion pills for sale in dubai@
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Safe Software
 
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native ApplicationsArchitecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
WSO2
 

Dernier (20)

+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
 
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 AmsterdamDEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
 
Platformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
Platformless Horizons for Digital AdaptabilityPlatformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
Platformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Passkeys: Developing APIs to enable passwordless auth...
Apidays New York 2024 - Passkeys: Developing APIs to enable passwordless auth...Apidays New York 2024 - Passkeys: Developing APIs to enable passwordless auth...
Apidays New York 2024 - Passkeys: Developing APIs to enable passwordless auth...
 
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost SavingRepurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
 
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
 
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptxCorporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
 
Elevate Developer Efficiency & build GenAI Application with Amazon Q​
Elevate Developer Efficiency & build GenAI Application with Amazon Q​Elevate Developer Efficiency & build GenAI Application with Amazon Q​
Elevate Developer Efficiency & build GenAI Application with Amazon Q​
 
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native ApplicationsArchitecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
 
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWEREMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
 
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
 
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with MilvusExploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
 
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
 
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdfRising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
 
Artificial Intelligence Chap.5 : Uncertainty
Artificial Intelligence Chap.5 : UncertaintyArtificial Intelligence Chap.5 : Uncertainty
Artificial Intelligence Chap.5 : Uncertainty
 
Six Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal Ontology
Six Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal OntologySix Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal Ontology
Six Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal Ontology
 
Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..
Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..
Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..
 

Natural Language Checking with Program Checking Tools

  • 1. Natural Language Checking with Program Checking Tools Fabrizio Perin, Lukas Renggli, Jorge Ressia
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15. (2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in Smalltalk; (3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in natural language; and (4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the problems detected by the tool. Text Parsing Model Validation Failures Rules Styles GUI Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint. Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in
  • 16. (2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in Smalltalk; (3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in natural language; and (4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the problems detected by the tool. Text Parsing Model Validation Failures Rules Styles GUI Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint. Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in .txt .html .tex
  • 17. (2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in Smalltalk; (3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in natural language; and (4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the problems detected by the tool. Text Parsing Model Validation Failures Rules Styles GUI Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint. Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in
  • 18. (2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in Smalltalk; (3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in natural language; and (4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the problems detected by the tool. Text Parsing Model Validation Failures Rules Styles GUI Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint. Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in · The Markup models LATEX or HTML commands depending on the filetype of the input. All document elements answer the message text which returns a plain string representation of the modeled text entity ignoring markup tokens. Furthermore all elements know their source interval in the document. The relationship among the elements in the model are depicted in Figure 3. Element text() interval() Document Paragraph Sentence Phrase 1 * 1 * 1 * SyntacticElement text() interval() Word Punctuation Whitespace Markup 1 * 1 * Fig. 3. The TextLint model and the relationships between its classes. 3 From Strings to Objects To build the high-level document model from the flat input string we use PetitParser [7]. PetitParser is a framework targeted at parsing formal languages (e.g., programming languages), but we employ it in this project to parse natural 4
  • 19. raries: For parsing natural languages we use PetitParser [7], a flexible rsing framework that makes it easy to define parsers and to dynamically use, compose, transform and extend grammars. Furthermore, we use Glamour , an engine for scripting browsers. Glamour reifies the notion of a browser d defines the flow of data between different user interface widgets. he contributions of this paper are: 1) we apply ideas from program checking to the domain of natural language; 2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in Smalltalk; 3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in natural language; and 4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the problems detected by the tool. Text Parsing Model Validation Failures Rules Styles GUI representation of the modeled text entity ignoring markup tokens. Furthermore all elements know their source interval in the document. The relationship among the elements in the model are depicted in Figure 3. Element text() interval() Document Paragraph Sentence Phrase 1 * 1 * 1 * SyntacticElement text() interval() Word Punctuation Whitespace Markup 1 * 1 * Fig. 3. The TextLint model and the relationships between its classes.
  • 20. raries: For parsing natural languages we use PetitParser [7], a flexible rsing framework that makes it easy to define parsers and to dynamically use, compose, transform and extend grammars. Furthermore, we use Glamour , an engine for scripting browsers. Glamour reifies the notion of a browser d defines the flow of data between different user interface widgets. he contributions of this paper are: 1) we apply ideas from program checking to the domain of natural language; 2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in Smalltalk; 3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in natural language; and 4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the problems detected by the tool. Text Parsing Model Validation Failures Rules Styles GUI representation of the modeled text entity ignoring markup tokens. Furthermore all elements know their source interval in the document. The relationship among the elements in the model are depicted in Figure 3. Element text() interval() Document Paragraph Sentence Phrase 1 * 1 * 1 * SyntacticElement text() interval() Word Punctuation Whitespace Markup 1 * 1 * Fig. 3. The TextLint model and the relationships between its classes.
  • 21. raries: For parsing natural languages we use PetitParser [7], a flexible rsing framework that makes it easy to define parsers and to dynamically use, compose, transform and extend grammars. Furthermore, we use Glamour , an engine for scripting browsers. Glamour reifies the notion of a browser d defines the flow of data between different user interface widgets. he contributions of this paper are: 1) we apply ideas from program checking to the domain of natural language; 2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in Smalltalk; 3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in natural language; and 4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the problems detected by the tool. Text Parsing Model Validation Failures Rules Styles GUI representation of the modeled text entity ignoring markup tokens. Furthermore all elements know their source interval in the document. The relationship among the elements in the model are depicted in Figure 3. Element text() interval() Document Paragraph Sentence Phrase 1 * 1 * 1 * SyntacticElement text() interval() Word Punctuation Whitespace Markup 1 * 1 * Fig. 3. The TextLint model and the relationships between its classes.
  • 22. Other Language Models raries: For parsing natural languages we use PetitParser [7], a flexible rsing framework that makes it easy to define parsers and to dynamically use, compose, transform and extend grammars. Furthermore, we use Glamour , an engine for scripting browsers. Glamour reifies the notion of a browser d defines the flow of data between different user interface widgets. he contributions of this paper are: 1) we apply ideas from program checking to the domain of natural language; 2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in Smalltalk; 3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in natural language; and 4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the problems detected by the tool. Text Parsing Model Validation Failures Rules Styles GUI representation of the modeled text entity ignoring markup tokens. Furthermore all elements know their source interval in the document. The relationship among the elements in the model are depicted in Figure 3. Element text() interval() Document Paragraph Sentence Phrase 1 * 1 * 1 * SyntacticElement text() interval() Word Punctuation Whitespace Markup 1 * 1 * Fig. 3. The TextLint model and the relationships between its classes.
  • 23. (2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in Smalltalk; (3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in natural language; and (4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the problems detected by the tool. Text Parsing Model Validation Failures Rules Styles GUI Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint. Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in
  • 24. (2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in Smalltalk; (3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in natural language; and (4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the problems detected by the tool. Text Parsing Model Validation Failures Rules Styles GUI Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint. Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in
  • 25. Avoid "a lot" Avoid "a" Avoid "allow to" Avoid "an" Avoid "as to whether" Avoid "can not" Avoid "case" Avoid "certainly" Avoid "could" Avoid "currently" Avoid "different than" Avoid "doubt but" Avoid "each and every one" Avoid "enormity" Avoid "factor" Avoid "funny" Avoid "help but" Avoid "help to" Avoid "however" Avoid "importantly" Avoid "in order to" Avoid "in regards to" Avoid "in terms of" Avoid "insightful" Avoid "interesting" Avoid "irregardless" Avoid "one of the most" Avoid "regarded as" Avoid "required to" Avoid "somehow" Avoid "stuff" Avoid "the fact is" Avoid "the fact that" Avoid "the truth is" Avoid "thing" Avoid "thus" Avoid "true fact" Avoid "would" Avoid comma Avoid connectors repetition Avoid continuous punctuation Avoid continuous word repetition Avoid contraction Avoid joined sentences Avoid long paragraph Avoid long sentence Avoid passive voice Avoid qualifier Avoid whitespace Avoid word repetition raries: For parsing natural languages we use PetitParser [7], a flexible rsing framework that makes it easy to define parsers and to dynamically use, compose, transform and extend grammars. Furthermore, we use Glamour , an engine for scripting browsers. Glamour reifies the notion of a browser d defines the flow of data between different user interface widgets. he contributions of this paper are: 1) we apply ideas from program checking to the domain of natural language; 2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in Smalltalk; 3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in natural language; and 4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the problems detected by the tool. Text Parsing Model Validation Failures Rules Styles GUI
  • 26. Avoid "a lot" Avoid "a" Avoid "allow to" Avoid "an" Avoid "as to whether" Avoid "can not" Avoid "case" Avoid "certainly" Avoid "could" Avoid "currently" Avoid "different than" Avoid "doubt but" Avoid "each and every one" Avoid "enormity" Avoid "factor" Avoid "funny" Avoid "help but" Avoid "help to" Avoid "however" Avoid "importantly" Avoid "in order to" Avoid "in regards to" Avoid "in terms of" Avoid "insightful" Avoid "interesting" Avoid "irregardless" Avoid "one of the most" Avoid "regarded as" Avoid "required to" Avoid "somehow" Avoid "stuff" Avoid "the fact is" Avoid "the fact that" Avoid "the truth is" Avoid "thing" Avoid "thus" Avoid "true fact" Avoid "would" Avoid comma Avoid connectors repetition Avoid continuous punctuation Avoid continuous word repetition Avoid contraction Avoid joined sentences Avoid long paragraph Avoid long sentence Avoid passive voice Avoid qualifier Avoid whitespace Avoid word repetition raries: For parsing natural languages we use PetitParser [7], a flexible rsing framework that makes it easy to define parsers and to dynamically use, compose, transform and extend grammars. Furthermore, we use Glamour , an engine for scripting browsers. Glamour reifies the notion of a browser d defines the flow of data between different user interface widgets. he contributions of this paper are: 1) we apply ideas from program checking to the domain of natural language; 2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in Smalltalk; 3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in natural language; and 4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the problems detected by the tool. Text Parsing Model Validation Failures Rules Styles GUI (self  word:  ‘somehow’)
  • 27. Avoid "a lot" Avoid "a" Avoid "allow to" Avoid "an" Avoid "as to whether" Avoid "can not" Avoid "case" Avoid "certainly" Avoid "could" Avoid "currently" Avoid "different than" Avoid "doubt but" Avoid "each and every one" Avoid "enormity" Avoid "factor" Avoid "funny" Avoid "help but" Avoid "help to" Avoid "however" Avoid "importantly" Avoid "in order to" Avoid "in regards to" Avoid "in terms of" Avoid "insightful" Avoid "interesting" Avoid "irregardless" Avoid "one of the most" Avoid "regarded as" Avoid "required to" Avoid "somehow" Avoid "stuff" Avoid "the fact is" Avoid "the fact that" Avoid "the truth is" Avoid "thing" Avoid "thus" Avoid "true fact" Avoid "would" Avoid comma Avoid connectors repetition Avoid continuous punctuation Avoid continuous word repetition Avoid contraction Avoid joined sentences Avoid long paragraph Avoid long sentence Avoid passive voice Avoid qualifier Avoid whitespace Avoid word repetition raries: For parsing natural languages we use PetitParser [7], a flexible rsing framework that makes it easy to define parsers and to dynamically use, compose, transform and extend grammars. Furthermore, we use Glamour , an engine for scripting browsers. Glamour reifies the notion of a browser d defines the flow of data between different user interface widgets. he contributions of this paper are: 1) we apply ideas from program checking to the domain of natural language; 2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in Smalltalk; 3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in natural language; and 4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the problems detected by the tool. Text Parsing Model Validation Failures Rules Styles GUI (self  punctuation)  ,  (self  punctuation)
  • 28. Avoid "a lot" Avoid "a" Avoid "allow to" Avoid "an" Avoid "as to whether" Avoid "can not" Avoid "case" Avoid "certainly" Avoid "could" Avoid "currently" Avoid "different than" Avoid "doubt but" Avoid "each and every one" Avoid "enormity" Avoid "factor" Avoid "funny" Avoid "help but" Avoid "help to" Avoid "however" Avoid "importantly" Avoid "in order to" Avoid "in regards to" Avoid "in terms of" Avoid "insightful" Avoid "interesting" Avoid "irregardless" Avoid "one of the most" Avoid "regarded as" Avoid "required to" Avoid "somehow" Avoid "stuff" Avoid "the fact is" Avoid "the fact that" Avoid "the truth is" Avoid "thing" Avoid "thus" Avoid "true fact" Avoid "would" Avoid comma Avoid connectors repetition Avoid continuous punctuation Avoid continuous word repetition Avoid contraction Avoid joined sentences Avoid long paragraph Avoid long sentence Avoid passive voice Avoid qualifier Avoid whitespace Avoid word repetition raries: For parsing natural languages we use PetitParser [7], a flexible rsing framework that makes it easy to define parsers and to dynamically use, compose, transform and extend grammars. Furthermore, we use Glamour , an engine for scripting browsers. Glamour reifies the notion of a browser d defines the flow of data between different user interface widgets. he contributions of this paper are: 1) we apply ideas from program checking to the domain of natural language; 2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in Smalltalk; 3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in natural language; and 4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the problems detected by the tool. Text Parsing Model Validation Failures Rules Styles GUI (self  wordIn:  #('am'  'are'  'were'  'being'  ...  ))  ,   (self  separator  star)  ,   ((self  wordSatisfying:  [  :value  |  value  endsWith:  'ed'  ])  /    (self  wordIn:  #('awoken'  'been'  'born'  'beat'  ...  )))
  • 29. (2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in Smalltalk; (3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in natural language; and (4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the problems detected by the tool. Text Parsing Model Validation Failures Rules Styles GUI Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint. Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in
  • 30. (2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in Smalltalk; (3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in natural language; and (4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the problems detected by the tool. Text Parsing Model Validation Failures Rules Styles GUI Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint. Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in scientificPaperStyle  :=  TLTextLintRule  allRules -­‐  TLWordRepetitionInParagraphRule
  • 31. (2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in Smalltalk; (3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in natural language; and (4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the problems detected by the tool. Text Parsing Model Validation Failures Rules Styles GUI Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint. Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in
  • 32. (2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in Smalltalk; (3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in natural language; and (4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the problems detected by the tool. Text Parsing Model Validation Failures Rules Styles GUI Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint. Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in
  • 33. (2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in Smalltalk; (3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in natural language; and (4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the problems detected by the tool. Text Parsing Model Validation Failures Rules Styles GUI Fig. 2. Data Flow through TextLint. Figure 2 gives an overview of the architecture of TextLint. Section 2 introduces the natural text model of TextLint and Section 3 details how text documents are parsed and the model is composed. Section 4 presents the rules which model the stylistic checks. Section 5 describes how stylistic rules are defined in
  • 34. raries: For parsing natural languages we use PetitParser [7], a flexible rsing framework that makes it easy to define parsers and to dynamically use, compose, transform and extend grammars. Furthermore, we use Glamour , an engine for scripting browsers. Glamour reifies the notion of a browser d defines the flow of data between different user interface widgets. he contributions of this paper are: 1) we apply ideas from program checking to the domain of natural language; 2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in Smalltalk; 3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in natural language; and 4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the problems detected by the tool. Text Parsing Model Validation Failures Rules Styles GUI
  • 35. raries: For parsing natural languages we use PetitParser [7], a flexible rsing framework that makes it easy to define parsers and to dynamically use, compose, transform and extend grammars. Furthermore, we use Glamour , an engine for scripting browsers. Glamour reifies the notion of a browser d defines the flow of data between different user interface widgets. he contributions of this paper are: 1) we apply ideas from program checking to the domain of natural language; 2) we implement an object-oriented model used to represent natural text in Smalltalk; 3) we demonstrate a pattern matcher for the detection of style issues in natural language; and 4) we demonstrate a graphical user interface that presents and explains the problems detected by the tool. Text Parsing Model Validation Failures Rules Styles GUI
  • 37. t t1 t2 t3 t4 Issues Words Fig. 6. Evolution of a paper from beginning to publication. 7.1 History of a Paper
  • 38. Avoid‘currently’-74% Avoid‘certainly’-25% Avoid‘would’-24% Avoid‘factor’-20% Avoidlongparagraph-20% Avoid‘thus’-13% Avoid‘however’-10% Avoid‘case’-7% Avoid‘cannot’-5% Avoid‘could’-5% Avoidpassivevoice-4% Avoid‘insightful’-3% Avoid‘stuff’-3% Avoidjoinedsentences-1% Avoid‘astowhether’0% Avoid‘differentthan’0% Avoid‘doubtbut’0% Avoid‘eachandeveryone’0% Avoid‘enormity’0% Avoid‘helpbut’0% Avoid‘inregardsto’0% Avoid‘irregardless’0% Avoid‘regardedas’0% Avoid‘thefactis’0% Avoid‘thetruthis’0% Avoid‘truefact’0% Avoidcomma0% Avoidqualifier2% Avoid‘funny’5% Avoid‘oneofthemost’5% Avoid‘importantly’9% Avoidlongsentence10% Avoid‘an’10% Avoidcontinuouspunctuation15% Avoid‘interesting’17% Avoid‘requiredto’17% Avoid‘a’23% Avoid‘inorderto’23% Avoidcontinuouswordrepetition24% Avoid‘intermsof’24% Avoid‘somehow’25% Avoid‘helpto’27% Avoid‘thefactthat’32% Avoidwhitespace45% Avoid‘allowto’46% Avoid‘alot’55% Avoid‘thing’70% Avoidcontraction73% Fig.7.EffectivenessofvariousTextLintrules. amorein-depthdiscussionoftoolsthatcommentonwritingstylecouldbeincluded.
  • 39. Future Work ‣ Natural Language Model ‣ Styles for Other Domains ‣ More Rules
  • 40.