Essay On Strong America Gmo Pros And Cons Essay Competitive Sports Essay Common Good Argument

1. Essay On Strong America
All American citizens want America to once again be "strong"; however, most American citizens are
reclining in their chairs at home waiting for it to happen–– without putting forth an effort in
succeeding. What even defines the term "strong" and how can Americans contribute to making this
nation superior? Strong is possessing skills and qualities that create a likelihood of success; it
requires that individuals must unify together, assist others in need, and quit blaming others for his or
her own mistakes. In addition, unification is a huge factor that must be considered during a process
of reconciliation. Therefore, in order for Americans to unify together, they must eradicate all forms
of judgement and become accepting to diversity. If someone had a jar with ten–thousand M&Ms,
but ten of them were poisoned, would they eat from the jar? In other words, if someone had
three–hundred and nineteen million American citizens and thirty one–thousand and nine–hundred of
them are in some way...show more content...
The person may have made a mistake, however, this is the type of person that builds upon his or her
mistakes with understanding, which results in him or her striving to prevent similar circumstances
in the future. This is what builds a strong American. This is what developes a superior nation unlike
any other. A person that owns up to his or her mistakes does not blame other. Instead, he or she
takes initiative in resolving any issues that may have risen. This does not happen often, though, in
this "great" and "strong" nation. "This is the president's fault.", "This would have never happened if
someone else was running this country.", and "Things will never be resolved." are only a few
common remarks from Americans in today's society, yet they maintain the same position in a
reclined chair doing nothing but complain–– blaming others for his or her
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

2. Gmo Pros And Cons Essay
GMO's are safe and great for growing world Are you wearing a cotton shirt? What if I told you
that cotton is genetically modified? There are many products that have been genetically modified
for over 20 years, but there are a group of people that have just started worrying about it now. The
definition of a GMO is to genetically modifying an organism to improve on the genetics already
in the organism. Despite what people think GMO's are safe for humans to eat and don't cause any
human health risks. Corn and beans, wheat and canola, carrots and potatoes can all be genetically
modified. In America, over 80% of processed food contains GMOs (Baragona). The reason behind
genetically modifying organisms is to produce more with less. With the world expected to add
another 2 billion people by 2050, demand for food and clothing will increase by at least 60%
(Baragona). GMO's have been grown by many farmers for over 20 years. And the big organic
movement started now. Why have many people started worrying about GMO's, because there are
other people out...show more content...
Most times this view refers to insects or plants being harmed by the crops. herbicide, fungicide,
and pesticides. All of these could be used in reduced amounts with the use of more GMOs. This
would keep herbicide, fungicide, and pesticides out of our rivers, creeks, and streams. Which helps
the environment. A major upside to GMOs is fighting world hunger. People also need to realize
that the world population is increasing rapidly (Baragona).The only way that we will be able to
support the growing population is to produce more food while still using the same amount or less
resources. Farmers can do this by through the use of GMO's. GMO's have certain traits that
non–GMO organisms don't have that can make crops produce more food and resources while using
less water and
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

3. Competitive Sports Essay
Did you know that sports and regular exercise provide physical and mental stress relief, which can
help certain mental health disorders like depression and anxiety. There has been a long
disagreement about whether kids should be able to play sports or not. I believe that they should be
able to. I do know that sports can cause problems, but I believe the benefits overweigh these
problems. Competitive sports can help deal with varieties of these discomforts including physical,
social, and mental health. In sports you can gain social skills, and make friends, while staying fit.
Sports can boost self–confidence. Also, sports keep kids healthy. I will be arguing that kids should
be able to play competitive sports.
My first reason is that...show more content...
Take it from me, I used to and sometimes still do stress for gymnastics competitions. When I get
on the floor and am ready to compete, I just think "I have been doing this for months. There is no
reason to be nervous. I just have to do my best and I will be happy." As a result, you will be less
stressed out, and can enjoy the sport you are passionate about.
My third reason is that sports keep kids healthy. Sports are a major benefit when it comes to
physical health. If you are looking to exercise more, but don't want to compete, there are other
opportunities for you to choose such as martial arts, or yoga. Kids need physical activity
everyday and playing sports will fill that need. "Exercising everyday will increase their chance of
being a healthy adult." (Mary L. Gavin, 2017) Although injuries can happen while playing sports,
I think the benefits such as life skills, are much more worth it when it comes to later life. On the
other hand, kids who play sports tend to stay more fit. Most kids don't have the motivation to
work out themselves, and joining a sports team will keep them working out. According to CNN's
article "Team sports help keep teens fit", a study found that the kids who played on three or more
sports teams in a year, were 27% less likely to be overweight, and 39% less likely to be obese than
those teens who did not play team sports. (Val Wadas
–Willingham, 2012) This is saying that kids
who play sports fill the need of
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

4. Common Good Argument
Galston (2013) claims that idea of the common good "has real content in theory and real utility in
practice", throughout his essay on the common good, he provides sufficient evidence to back his
main claim and he uses it to refute the arguments of others. He defines three key aspects of the
common good to support his claim of the common good having "real content in theory", these
include: 'Inherently social goods', 'Social linkages' and 'The good of the commons'. Galston (2013)
then proceeds to give evidence on the concept of bargaining and the U.S. Constitution; he uses these
examples to support his claim that the common good has "real utility in practice". I believe Galston
understands the academic conversation around the common good quite...show more content...
One example he gives based on inherently social goods is humor, "telling a joke to oneself is
virtually impossible, because humor requires surprise", as a result, this allows us to make the
inference that there are certain aspects of life that require the company of others and without it, the
good (humor in this case) would be lost. Galston (2013) states that 'The good of the commons' is
when how people behave in shared social spaces impacts others (p.11). "If we carelessly leave an
unextinguished fire in a camp–ground, the entire facility may go up in flames." (p.11), this shows
how the common good includes everyone's best interests and this example in fact shows that it does
have "real content in theory" as it is quite easy to imagine the scenarios he has presented, occurring
in real
Get more content on HelpWriting.net