Many of the associations formed in Africa and Latin America have had little impact because perceived benefits were not sufficient to offset the partial loss of sovereignty.
Every type of economic union shares the development and enlargement of market opportunities. The total benefit of economic integration must outweigh individual differences as member countries adjust to new trade relationships.
The communist threat no longer exists, but the importance of political unity to fully achieve all the benefits of economic
integration has driven European countries to move towards a political union.
NAFTA and Mercosur are examples of Free Trade Areas.
Customs unions exist between France and Monaco, Italy and San Marino, and Switzerland and Liechtenstein.
The EU evolved from the development of a common market, the European Economic Community (EEC).
COMECON is an enforced political union and the EU is a voluntary one.
All of these warrant the study of three multinational regions: Europe, Africa, and the Middle East.
The goal is to end specific physical, technical, and fiscal barriers. Combined GDP of $7.58 trillion. Population of over 371 million consumers.
The most heterogeneous of all blocs. Differ significantly on Hofstede’s values. Nationalities are distinct.
Source: Euro, http://www.europa.eu.int/euro. Reprinted with permission from the European Communities.
The admission to the Euro Zone had two conditions for each country that a few countries did not meet but the commission made exceptions: debt 60 percent or less of GDP and annual deficit 3 percent or less of GDP, to qualify to be part of the monetary union. This is partly the cause for the financial turmoil first in Greece followed by Spain and Portugal, which fall at the bottom of the EU region economically. Germany and Luxembourg have very high GNPs per capita. Greece and Portugal have relatively low GNPs per capita.
These countries are moving away from state-owned enterprises to privatization. There are other problems in Eastern Europe such as the political turmoil in the former Yugoslavian region. In spite of this, countries in Eastern Europe are adopting legislation that conforms to that of advanced economies.
The very different paths taken toward market economies have resulted in different levels of progress. Countries such as the Czech Republic, which moved quickly to introduce major changes, seem to have fared better than countries such as Hungary, Poland, and Romania, which held off privatizing until the government restructured internally. Moving quickly allows the transformation to be guided mainly by the spontaneity of innovative market forces rather than by government planners or technocrats. Those countries that took the slow road permitted the bureaucrats from communist days to organize effectively to delay and even derail the transition to a market economy. Yugoslavia has been plagued with internal strife over ethnic divisions, and four of its republics (Croatia, Slovenia, Macedonia, and Bosnia/Herzegovina) seceded from the federation, leaving Serbia and Montenegro in the reduced Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Soon after seceding, a devastating ethnic war
broke out in Croatia and Bosnia/Herzegovina that decimated their economies.
A tentative peace maintained by United Nations peacekeepers now exists, but for all practical purposes, the economies of Croatia and Bosnia are worse now than ever before. Most recently, the Kosovo region of Serbia also declared its independence, and political tension remains.
Although Latvia and Lithuania have made steady progress, government bureaucracy, corruption, and organized crime—common problems found in the countries of the former Soviet Union—continue.
The 12 members of the CIS share a common history of central planning. Membership in the former USSR is what these countries have in common. Of all the former republics, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Armenia have been the most economically successful since leaving the former USSR.
South Africa’s economic growth has increased significantly. Upbeat economic predictions, a stable sociopolitical environment, and the reinforced vigor of the South African government in addressing the issues of privatization and deregulation while maintaining the long-term goal of making the country more investor friendly.
The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), the Southern African Development Community (SADC), and the East African Community (EAC) are the three most active regional cooperative groups. A 15-nation group, ECOWAS has an aggregate gross domestic product of more than $60 billion and is striving to achieve full economic integration. The Southern African Development Community is the most advanced and viable of Africa’s regional organizations. Its 15 members encompass a landmass of 7 million square kilometers containing abundant natural resources and a population of over 250 million. South Africa, the region’s dominant economy, has a GDP of over $200 billion and accounts for 76.8 percent of SADC market share.
For example, in an integrated Europe, U.S. multinationals had an initial advantage over expanded European firms because U.S. businesses were more experienced in marketing to large, diverse markets and are accustomed to looking at Europe as one market. Each group now has management and administrative bodies specifically concerned with business. The U.S did not have the complex task of integrating multiple currencies.