SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  7
Step Description Value (30 % HARQ)
1 eNBProcessingDelay(S1-U->Uu) 1 ms
2 Frame Alignment 1,022 ms
3 TTI for DL DATA PACKET 0,675 ms
4 HARQ Retransmission 0,3 * 5 ms
5 UE ProcessingDelay 1 ms
6 S1-U TransferDelayand aGW 7 ms (Note)
Total one way delay 12,2 ms
NOTE: The delaybudgetwasmeasuredinproductionenvironments,The S1-Udelayisbandwith
depended.
Speech pathdelay
Jitter is defined as a variation in the delay of received packets. The sending side
transmits packets in a continuous stream and spaces them evenly apart. Because of network
congestion, improper queuing, or configuration errors, the delay betweenpackets can vary
instead of remaining constant, as shown in the figure.
n the RRC you can increase jtter buffer size and delay. Try to use larger RTP package, test with
40ms. Lower audio quality = 0 can be a solution. That's about what you can do locally in the
RRCs
ncrease rx jitter buffer to min 12+
- increase rx jitter delay to min 10+
- audio packet size 20 or 40
Jitter is a variation in packet transit delay caused by queuing, contention and serialization
effects on the path through the network. In general, higher levels ofjitter are more likely to occur
on either slow or heavily congested links.
Delay and latency are similar terms that refer to the amount of time it takes a bit to be
transmitted from source to destination. Jitter is delay that varies over time. One way to
view latency is how long a system holds on to a packet. ... The speed of a system is affected by
congestion and delays.
Jitter in IP networks is the variation in the latency on a packet flow between two systems, when
some packets take longer to travel from one system to the other.Jitter results from network
congestion, timing drift and route changes
Handover interruption delay
HybridARQ enabledRate adaptationbasedonCQIfeedbackRLCAMmode Multiple bearersQoS
scheduler
Duringhandoverprocess,forsome period,userequipments cannotexchangeuserplane packetswith
any of the base stations.Thisperiodisknownashandoverinterruptiontime.Itincludesthe time
requiredtoexecute anyradioaccessnetworkprocedure,radioresourcecontrol signaling,orother
message exchanges betweenthe userequipmentandthe radioaccessnetwork.The impactof intraLTE-
Advancedhandoversoninterruptiontimeislessthanorequal to that providedbyhandoversinLTE.In
LTE-Advanced,sub-framesize,alsoknownasTransmissionTime Interval (TTI),of 1msmakesitcapable
of adaptingtofast changingradiolinkconditionsandallowsexploitationof multiuserdiversity[7].In
LTE-Advanced,processingdelaysindifferentnodesandRACHschedulingperiodare reducedin
comparisontoLTE. RACH cycle isdecreasedfrom5.0ms to1.0ms. Thistutorial outlinesthe procedures
involvedinhandoverprocessandanalyzesthe performance of handoverinterruptiontimeforbothFDD
and TDD modes.The paperis organizedasfollows:SectionIIexplainsthe minimumrequirementssetby
IMT-Advancedandassumptionsof analysis.SectionIII
presentsthe analysisof handoverinterruptiontimebeforethe conclusionsare drawninSectionIV.II.
REQUIREMENTS & ASSUMPTIONSA.MinimumRequirementsThe IMT-Advancedproposal shallbe able
to supporthandoverinterruptiontimesspecifiedinTable I[8].TABLE I IMT-A REQUIREMENTS Handover
Type InterruptionTime (ms) Intra-Frequency27.4Inter-FrequencyWithinaspectrumband40.0
Betweenspectrumbands60.0 B. AssumptionsHandoverInterruptiontime forintra-frequencyand
interfrequencyisthe same asitdoesnot dependonthe frequencyof the targetcell aslongas the cell
has alreadybeenmeasuredbythe UserEquipment(UE),whichisatypical scenario[8].Forthe purposes
of determininghandoverinterruptiontime,interactionswiththe core network(i.e.,networkentities
beyondthe radioaccessnetwork) are assumedtooccur in zerotime.Itis alsoassumedthatall
necessaryattributesof the targetchannel (thatis,downlinksynchronizationisachievedanduplink
access procedures,if applicable,are successfullycompleted) are knownatinitiationof the handover
fromthe servingchannel tothe targetchannel [9].ForanalysisRACHand PUCCH cycle istakenas 1ms.
The RACH and PUCCH waitingtimesinTDDcases are calculatedbasedonthe UL/DL sub-frame locations
inthe respective frame configurations.InTDDmode analysis,frame configuration1isconsidered.III.
ANALYSISThe intra- andinter-frequencyhandoverinterruptiontime iscalculatedbasedonthe
handoverprocedure showninfigure 3.The stepsinvolvedinhandoverinterruptionare:1) Radio
Synchronizationtothe targetcell.2) Average delaydue toRandomAccessCHannel (RACH) scheduling
period.3) RACH Preamble Transmission.4) Preamble detectionatTargeteNodeB.5) Transmissionof
RandomAccess(RA) - Time betweenthe RA responsetransmissionandUE’s receptionof scheduling
grant. 6) Decodingof schedulinggrantandtimingalignmentatUE. 7) Transmissionof data.Radio
synchronizationdelayisthe sumof the delaycausedbyfrequencysynchronizationanddownlink
synchronization.Frequencysynchronizationdelaydependsonwhetherthe targetcell isoperatingon
the same carrier frequencyasthe servingcell.Butsince the UE has alreadyidentifiedand
When the phone at the opposite end of the connection receives the RTP packets, it must
reassemble them back into an audio signal. If packets are missing, the audio signal will contain
gaps. This packet loss can be caused by a number of network problems. One
common cause of packet loss is congested WAN links.
There are two types of EPS bearers: default and dedicated. In the LTE network, the
EPS bearer QoS is controlled using the following LTE QoS parameters:
▶ Resource Type: GBR or Non-GBR
▶ QoS Parameters
 QCI
 ARP
 GBR
 MBR
 APN-AMBR
 UE-AMBR
Every EPS bearer must have QI and ARP defined. The QCI is particularly important
because it serves as reference in determining QoS level for each EPS bearer. In case
of bandwidth (bit rate), GBR and MBR are defined only in GBR type EPS bearers,
whereas AMBR (APN-AMBR and UE-AMBR) is defined only in Non-GBR type EPS
bearers.
Below, we will explain the LTE QoS parameters one by one.
Resource Type = GBR (Guaranteed Bit Rate)
For an EPS bearer, having a GBR resource type means the bandwidth of the bearer is
guaranteed. Obviously, a GBR type EPS bearer has a "guaranteed bit rate" associated
(GBR will be further explained below) as one of its QoS parameters. Only a dedicated
EPS bearer can be a GBR type bearer and no default EPS bearer can be GBR type. The
QCI of a GBR type EPS bearer can range from 1 to 4.
Resource Type = Non-GBR
For an EPS bearer, having a non-GBR resource type means that the bearer is a best
effort type bearer and its bandwidth is not guaranteed. A default EPS bearer is always
a Non-GBR bearer, whereas a dedicated EPS bearer can be either GBR or non-GBR.
The QCI of a non-GBR type EPS bearer can range from 5 to 9.
QCI (QoS Class Identifier)
QCI, in an integer from 1 to 9, indicates nine different QoS performance
characteristics of each IP packet. QCI values are standardized to reference specific
QoS characteristics, and each QCI contains standardized performance characteristics
(values), such as resource type (GBR or non-GBR), priority (1~9), Packet Delay
Budget (allowed packet delay shown in values ranging from 50 ms to 300 ms), Packet
Error Loss Rate (allowed packet loss shown in values from 10-2 to 10-6. For more
specific values, search on Google for "3GPP TS 23.203" and see Table 6.1.7 in the
document. For example, QCI 1 and 9 are defined as follows:
QCI = 1
: Resource Type = GBR, Priority = 2, Packet Delay Budget = 100ms, Packet Error
Loss Rate = 10-2 , Example Service = Voice
QCI = 9
: Resource Type = Non-GBR, Priority = 9, Packet Delay Budget = 300ms, Packet Error
Loss Rate = 10-6, Example Service = Internet
QoS to be guaranteed for an EPS bearer or SDF varies depending on the QCI values
specified.
QCI, though a single integer, represents node-specific parameters that give the details
of how an LTE node handles packet forwarding (e.g. scheduling weights, admission
thresholds, queue thresholds, link layer protocol configuration, etc). Network
operators have their LTE nodes pre-configured to handle packet forwarding according
to the QCI value.
By pre-defining the performance characteristics of each QCI value and having them
standardized, the network operators can ensure the same minimum level QoS
required by the LTE standards is provided to different services/applications used in an
LTE network consisting of various nodes from multi-vendors.
QCI values seem to be mostly used by eNBs in controlling the priority of packets
delivered over radio links. That's because practically it is not easy for S-GW or P-GW,
in a wired link, to process packets and also forward them based on the QCI
characteristics all at the same time (As you may know, a Cisco or Juniper router would
not care about delay or error loss rate when it processes QoS of packets. It would
merely decide which packet to send first through scheduling (WFQ, DWRR, SPQ, etc.)
based on the priority of the packets (802.1p/DSCP/MPLS EXP)).
ARP (Allocation and Retention Priority)
When a new EPS bearer is needed in an LTE network with insufficient resources, an
LTE entity (e.g. P-GW, S-GW or eNB) decides, based on ARP (an integer ranging from
1 to 15, with 1 being the highest level of priority), whether to:
 remove the existing EPS bearer and create a new one (e.g. removing an EPS bearer
with low priority ARP to create one with high priority ARP); or
 refuse to create a new one.
So, the ARP is considered only when deciding whether to create a new EPS bearer or
not. Once a new bearer is created and packets are delivered through it, the ARP does
not affect the priority of the delivered packet, and thus the network node/entity
forwards the packets regardless of their ARP values.
One of the most representative examples of using the ARP is an emergency VoIP call.
So, an existing EPS bearer can be removed if a new one is required for a emergency
119 (911 in US, 112 in EC, etc) VoIP call.
GBR (UL/DL)
This parameter is used for a GBR type bearer, and indicates the bandwidth (bit rate)
to be guaranteed by the LTE network. It is not applied to a non-GBR bearer with no
guaranteed bandwidth (UL is for uplink traffic and DL is for downlink traffic).
MBR (UL/DL)
MBR is used for a GBR type bearer, and indicates the maximum bit rate allowed in the
LTE network. Any packets arriving at the bearer after the specified MBR is exceeded
will be discarded.
APN-AMBR (UL/DL)
As you read the foregoing paragraph, you may wonder why a non-GBR type bearer
does not have a "bandwidth limit"? In case of non-GBR bearers, it is the total
bandwidth of all the non-GBR EPS bearers in a PDN that is limited, not the individual
bandwidth of each bearer. And this restriction is controlled by APN-AMBR (UL/DL). As
seen in the figure above, there are two non-GBR EPS bearers, and their maximum
bandwidths are specified by the APN-AMBR (UL/DL). This parameter is applied at UE
(for UL traffic only) and P-GW (for both DL and UL traffic).
UE-AMBR (UL/DL)
In the figure above, APN-AMBR and UE-AMBR look the same. But, please take a look
at the one below.
A UE can be connected to more than one PDN (e.g. PDN 1 for Internet, PDN 2 for VoIP
using IMS, etc.) and it has one unique IP address for each of its all PDN connections.
Here, UE-AMBR (UL/DL) indicates the maximum bandwidth allowed for all the non-
GBR EPS bearers associated to the UE no matter how many PDN connections the UE
has. Other PDNs are connected through other P-GWs, this parameter is applied by
eNBs only.
How SRVCC works
The SRVCC implementation controls the transfer of calls in both directions.
LTE to legacy network handover
Handover from LTE to the legacy network is required when the user moves out of the LTE coverage
area. Using SRVCC, the handover is undertaken in two stages.
 Radio Access Technology transfer: The handover for the radio access network and this
is a well-established protocol that is in use for transfers from 3G to 2G for example.
 Session transfer: The session transfer is the new element that is required for SRVCC. It is
required to move the access control and voice media anchoring from the Evolved Packet
Core, EPC of the packet switched LTE network to the legacy circuit switched network.
During the handover process the CSCF within the IMS architecture maintains the control of the
whole operation.
Voice handover using SRVCC on LTE
The SRVCC handover process takes place in a number of steps:
1. The handover process is initiated by a request for session transfer from the IMS CSCF.
2. The IMS CSCF responds simultaneously with two commands, one to the LTE network, and
the other to the legacy network.
3. the LTE network receives a radio Access Network handover execution command through the
MME and LTE RAN. This instructs the user device to prepare to move to a circuit switched
network for the voice call.
4. The destination legacy circuit switched network receives a session transfer response
preparing it to accept the call from the LTE network.
5. After all the commands have been executed and acknowledged the call is switched to the
legacy network with the IMS CSCF still in control of the call.
Legacy network to LTE
When returning a call to the LTE network much of the same functionality is again used.
To ensure the VoLTE device is able to return to the LTE RAN from the legacy RAN, there are two
options the legacy RAN can implement to provide a swift and effective return:
 Allow LTE information to be broadcast on the legacy RAN so the LTE device is able to
perform the cell reselection more easily.
 Simultaneously release the connection to the user device and redirect it to the LTE RAN.
SRVCC interruption performance
One of the key issues with VoLTE and SRVCC is the interruption time when handing over from an
LTE RAN to a legacy RAN.
The key methodology behind reducing he time is to simultaneous perform the redirections of RAN
and session. In this way the user experience is maintained and the actual interruption time is not
unduly noticeable.
It has been found that the session redirection is the faster of the two handovers, and therefore it is
necessary for the overall handover methodology to accommodate the fact that there are difference
between the two.

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Tendances (20)

VoLTE KPI Performance Explained
VoLTE KPI Performance ExplainedVoLTE KPI Performance Explained
VoLTE KPI Performance Explained
 
Lte1841
Lte1841Lte1841
Lte1841
 
gsm-kpi-optimization
 gsm-kpi-optimization gsm-kpi-optimization
gsm-kpi-optimization
 
LTE Optimization-KPIs.pptx
LTE Optimization-KPIs.pptxLTE Optimization-KPIs.pptx
LTE Optimization-KPIs.pptx
 
08. DRIVE TEST Analysis
08. DRIVE TEST Analysis08. DRIVE TEST Analysis
08. DRIVE TEST Analysis
 
Chap 4. call processing and handover.eng
Chap 4. call processing and handover.engChap 4. call processing and handover.eng
Chap 4. call processing and handover.eng
 
Cs fallback feature
Cs fallback featureCs fallback feature
Cs fallback feature
 
Lte principle
Lte principleLte principle
Lte principle
 
20121120 handover in lte
20121120 handover in lte20121120 handover in lte
20121120 handover in lte
 
Huawei - Access failures troubleshooting work shop
Huawei - Access failures troubleshooting work shopHuawei - Access failures troubleshooting work shop
Huawei - Access failures troubleshooting work shop
 
01 lte radio_parameters_lte_overview_rl1
01 lte radio_parameters_lte_overview_rl101 lte radio_parameters_lte_overview_rl1
01 lte radio_parameters_lte_overview_rl1
 
NEI_LTE1235_ready_02.pdf
NEI_LTE1235_ready_02.pdfNEI_LTE1235_ready_02.pdf
NEI_LTE1235_ready_02.pdf
 
LTE optimization
LTE optimizationLTE optimization
LTE optimization
 
Ltelocationandmobilitymanagement
LtelocationandmobilitymanagementLtelocationandmobilitymanagement
Ltelocationandmobilitymanagement
 
3GPP SON Series: Mobility Load Balancing (MLB)
3GPP SON Series: Mobility Load Balancing (MLB)3GPP SON Series: Mobility Load Balancing (MLB)
3GPP SON Series: Mobility Load Balancing (MLB)
 
305090798 04-basic-parameter-planning-rules-v1-1
305090798 04-basic-parameter-planning-rules-v1-1305090798 04-basic-parameter-planning-rules-v1-1
305090798 04-basic-parameter-planning-rules-v1-1
 
Volte troubleshooting
Volte troubleshootingVolte troubleshooting
Volte troubleshooting
 
Circuit switched fallback
Circuit switched fallbackCircuit switched fallback
Circuit switched fallback
 
Part 2 planning of 3G
Part 2  planning of 3GPart 2  planning of 3G
Part 2 planning of 3G
 
Initial LTE call Setup Flow
Initial LTE call Setup FlowInitial LTE call Setup Flow
Initial LTE call Setup Flow
 

Similaire à Ericsson interview

Ocgrr a new scheduling algorithm for differentiated services networks(synop...
Ocgrr   a new scheduling algorithm for differentiated services networks(synop...Ocgrr   a new scheduling algorithm for differentiated services networks(synop...
Ocgrr a new scheduling algorithm for differentiated services networks(synop...Mumbai Academisc
 
Design and implementation of low latency weighted round robin (ll wrr) schedu...
Design and implementation of low latency weighted round robin (ll wrr) schedu...Design and implementation of low latency weighted round robin (ll wrr) schedu...
Design and implementation of low latency weighted round robin (ll wrr) schedu...ijwmn
 
Quality of Service for Video Streaming using EDCA in MANET
Quality of Service for Video Streaming using EDCA in MANETQuality of Service for Video Streaming using EDCA in MANET
Quality of Service for Video Streaming using EDCA in MANETijsrd.com
 
QOS-BASED PACKET SCHEDULING ALGORITHMS FOR HETEROGENEOUS LTEADVANCED NETWORKS...
QOS-BASED PACKET SCHEDULING ALGORITHMS FOR HETEROGENEOUS LTEADVANCED NETWORKS...QOS-BASED PACKET SCHEDULING ALGORITHMS FOR HETEROGENEOUS LTEADVANCED NETWORKS...
QOS-BASED PACKET SCHEDULING ALGORITHMS FOR HETEROGENEOUS LTEADVANCED NETWORKS...ijwmn
 
QoS-based Packet Scheduling Algorithms for Heterogeneous LTE-Advanced Network...
QoS-based Packet Scheduling Algorithms for Heterogeneous LTE-Advanced Network...QoS-based Packet Scheduling Algorithms for Heterogeneous LTE-Advanced Network...
QoS-based Packet Scheduling Algorithms for Heterogeneous LTE-Advanced Network...ijwmn
 
Performance analysis of fls, exp, log and
Performance analysis of fls, exp, log andPerformance analysis of fls, exp, log and
Performance analysis of fls, exp, log andijwmn
 
Two-level scheduling scheme for integrated 4G-WLAN network
Two-level scheduling scheme for integrated 4G-WLAN network Two-level scheduling scheme for integrated 4G-WLAN network
Two-level scheduling scheme for integrated 4G-WLAN network IJECEIAES
 
Multiple Downlink Fair Packet Scheduling Scheme in Wi-Max
Multiple Downlink Fair Packet Scheduling Scheme in Wi-MaxMultiple Downlink Fair Packet Scheduling Scheme in Wi-Max
Multiple Downlink Fair Packet Scheduling Scheme in Wi-MaxEditor IJCATR
 
Survey on scheduling and radio resources allocation in lte
Survey on scheduling and radio resources allocation in lteSurvey on scheduling and radio resources allocation in lte
Survey on scheduling and radio resources allocation in lteijngnjournal
 
about message coalescing
about message coalescingabout message coalescing
about message coalescingyyooooon
 
LTE QOS DYNAMIC RESOURCE BLOCK ALLOCATION WITH POWER SOURCE LIMITATION AND QU...
LTE QOS DYNAMIC RESOURCE BLOCK ALLOCATION WITH POWER SOURCE LIMITATION AND QU...LTE QOS DYNAMIC RESOURCE BLOCK ALLOCATION WITH POWER SOURCE LIMITATION AND QU...
LTE QOS DYNAMIC RESOURCE BLOCK ALLOCATION WITH POWER SOURCE LIMITATION AND QU...IJCNCJournal
 
Rm literature survey_on_scheduling_and_resource_allocation_for_ieee_80211ax_p...
Rm literature survey_on_scheduling_and_resource_allocation_for_ieee_80211ax_p...Rm literature survey_on_scheduling_and_resource_allocation_for_ieee_80211ax_p...
Rm literature survey_on_scheduling_and_resource_allocation_for_ieee_80211ax_p...RESHAN FARAZ
 
Network Performance Enhancement for 1G-EPON by DBA Algorithms
Network Performance Enhancement for 1G-EPON by DBA AlgorithmsNetwork Performance Enhancement for 1G-EPON by DBA Algorithms
Network Performance Enhancement for 1G-EPON by DBA AlgorithmsIJERA Editor
 
Macro with pico cells (hetnets) system behaviour using well known scheduling ...
Macro with pico cells (hetnets) system behaviour using well known scheduling ...Macro with pico cells (hetnets) system behaviour using well known scheduling ...
Macro with pico cells (hetnets) system behaviour using well known scheduling ...ijwmn
 
Quality of service(qos) by M.BILAL.SATTI
Quality of service(qos) by M.BILAL.SATTIQuality of service(qos) by M.BILAL.SATTI
Quality of service(qos) by M.BILAL.SATTIMuhammad Bilal Satti
 

Similaire à Ericsson interview (20)

40520130101004
4052013010100440520130101004
40520130101004
 
Ocgrr a new scheduling algorithm for differentiated services networks(synop...
Ocgrr   a new scheduling algorithm for differentiated services networks(synop...Ocgrr   a new scheduling algorithm for differentiated services networks(synop...
Ocgrr a new scheduling algorithm for differentiated services networks(synop...
 
Wts qos
Wts qosWts qos
Wts qos
 
Design and implementation of low latency weighted round robin (ll wrr) schedu...
Design and implementation of low latency weighted round robin (ll wrr) schedu...Design and implementation of low latency weighted round robin (ll wrr) schedu...
Design and implementation of low latency weighted round robin (ll wrr) schedu...
 
Quality of Service for Video Streaming using EDCA in MANET
Quality of Service for Video Streaming using EDCA in MANETQuality of Service for Video Streaming using EDCA in MANET
Quality of Service for Video Streaming using EDCA in MANET
 
QOS-BASED PACKET SCHEDULING ALGORITHMS FOR HETEROGENEOUS LTEADVANCED NETWORKS...
QOS-BASED PACKET SCHEDULING ALGORITHMS FOR HETEROGENEOUS LTEADVANCED NETWORKS...QOS-BASED PACKET SCHEDULING ALGORITHMS FOR HETEROGENEOUS LTEADVANCED NETWORKS...
QOS-BASED PACKET SCHEDULING ALGORITHMS FOR HETEROGENEOUS LTEADVANCED NETWORKS...
 
QoS-based Packet Scheduling Algorithms for Heterogeneous LTE-Advanced Network...
QoS-based Packet Scheduling Algorithms for Heterogeneous LTE-Advanced Network...QoS-based Packet Scheduling Algorithms for Heterogeneous LTE-Advanced Network...
QoS-based Packet Scheduling Algorithms for Heterogeneous LTE-Advanced Network...
 
Performance analysis of fls, exp, log and
Performance analysis of fls, exp, log andPerformance analysis of fls, exp, log and
Performance analysis of fls, exp, log and
 
Two-level scheduling scheme for integrated 4G-WLAN network
Two-level scheduling scheme for integrated 4G-WLAN network Two-level scheduling scheme for integrated 4G-WLAN network
Two-level scheduling scheme for integrated 4G-WLAN network
 
Multiple Downlink Fair Packet Scheduling Scheme in Wi-Max
Multiple Downlink Fair Packet Scheduling Scheme in Wi-MaxMultiple Downlink Fair Packet Scheduling Scheme in Wi-Max
Multiple Downlink Fair Packet Scheduling Scheme in Wi-Max
 
Survey on scheduling and radio resources allocation in lte
Survey on scheduling and radio resources allocation in lteSurvey on scheduling and radio resources allocation in lte
Survey on scheduling and radio resources allocation in lte
 
about message coalescing
about message coalescingabout message coalescing
about message coalescing
 
LTE QOS DYNAMIC RESOURCE BLOCK ALLOCATION WITH POWER SOURCE LIMITATION AND QU...
LTE QOS DYNAMIC RESOURCE BLOCK ALLOCATION WITH POWER SOURCE LIMITATION AND QU...LTE QOS DYNAMIC RESOURCE BLOCK ALLOCATION WITH POWER SOURCE LIMITATION AND QU...
LTE QOS DYNAMIC RESOURCE BLOCK ALLOCATION WITH POWER SOURCE LIMITATION AND QU...
 
Rm literature survey_on_scheduling_and_resource_allocation_for_ieee_80211ax_p...
Rm literature survey_on_scheduling_and_resource_allocation_for_ieee_80211ax_p...Rm literature survey_on_scheduling_and_resource_allocation_for_ieee_80211ax_p...
Rm literature survey_on_scheduling_and_resource_allocation_for_ieee_80211ax_p...
 
Network Performance Enhancement for 1G-EPON by DBA Algorithms
Network Performance Enhancement for 1G-EPON by DBA AlgorithmsNetwork Performance Enhancement for 1G-EPON by DBA Algorithms
Network Performance Enhancement for 1G-EPON by DBA Algorithms
 
UDT
UDTUDT
UDT
 
Macro with pico cells (hetnets) system behaviour using well known scheduling ...
Macro with pico cells (hetnets) system behaviour using well known scheduling ...Macro with pico cells (hetnets) system behaviour using well known scheduling ...
Macro with pico cells (hetnets) system behaviour using well known scheduling ...
 
Quality of service(qos) by M.BILAL.SATTI
Quality of service(qos) by M.BILAL.SATTIQuality of service(qos) by M.BILAL.SATTI
Quality of service(qos) by M.BILAL.SATTI
 
Ijcnc050203
Ijcnc050203Ijcnc050203
Ijcnc050203
 
5g-Air-Interface-pptx.pptx
5g-Air-Interface-pptx.pptx5g-Air-Interface-pptx.pptx
5g-Air-Interface-pptx.pptx
 

Dernier

GEAR TRAIN- BASIC CONCEPTS AND WORKING PRINCIPLE
GEAR TRAIN- BASIC CONCEPTS AND WORKING PRINCIPLEGEAR TRAIN- BASIC CONCEPTS AND WORKING PRINCIPLE
GEAR TRAIN- BASIC CONCEPTS AND WORKING PRINCIPLEselvakumar948
 
Introduction to Serverless with AWS Lambda
Introduction to Serverless with AWS LambdaIntroduction to Serverless with AWS Lambda
Introduction to Serverless with AWS LambdaOmar Fathy
 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXssuser89054b
 
Employee leave management system project.
Employee leave management system project.Employee leave management system project.
Employee leave management system project.Kamal Acharya
 
Online electricity billing project report..pdf
Online electricity billing project report..pdfOnline electricity billing project report..pdf
Online electricity billing project report..pdfKamal Acharya
 
Wadi Rum luxhotel lodge Analysis case study.pptx
Wadi Rum luxhotel lodge Analysis case study.pptxWadi Rum luxhotel lodge Analysis case study.pptx
Wadi Rum luxhotel lodge Analysis case study.pptxNadaHaitham1
 
Navigating Complexity: The Role of Trusted Partners and VIAS3D in Dassault Sy...
Navigating Complexity: The Role of Trusted Partners and VIAS3D in Dassault Sy...Navigating Complexity: The Role of Trusted Partners and VIAS3D in Dassault Sy...
Navigating Complexity: The Role of Trusted Partners and VIAS3D in Dassault Sy...Arindam Chakraborty, Ph.D., P.E. (CA, TX)
 
COST-EFFETIVE and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptx
COST-EFFETIVE  and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptxCOST-EFFETIVE  and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptx
COST-EFFETIVE and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptxJIT KUMAR GUPTA
 
School management system project Report.pdf
School management system project Report.pdfSchool management system project Report.pdf
School management system project Report.pdfKamal Acharya
 
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power PlayStandard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power PlayEpec Engineered Technologies
 
HOA1&2 - Module 3 - PREHISTORCI ARCHITECTURE OF KERALA.pptx
HOA1&2 - Module 3 - PREHISTORCI ARCHITECTURE OF KERALA.pptxHOA1&2 - Module 3 - PREHISTORCI ARCHITECTURE OF KERALA.pptx
HOA1&2 - Module 3 - PREHISTORCI ARCHITECTURE OF KERALA.pptxSCMS School of Architecture
 
Kuwait City MTP kit ((+919101817206)) Buy Abortion Pills Kuwait
Kuwait City MTP kit ((+919101817206)) Buy Abortion Pills KuwaitKuwait City MTP kit ((+919101817206)) Buy Abortion Pills Kuwait
Kuwait City MTP kit ((+919101817206)) Buy Abortion Pills Kuwaitjaanualu31
 
DeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakes
DeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakesDeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakes
DeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakesMayuraD1
 
Engineering Drawing focus on projection of planes
Engineering Drawing focus on projection of planesEngineering Drawing focus on projection of planes
Engineering Drawing focus on projection of planesRAJNEESHKUMAR341697
 
Computer Lecture 01.pptxIntroduction to Computers
Computer Lecture 01.pptxIntroduction to ComputersComputer Lecture 01.pptxIntroduction to Computers
Computer Lecture 01.pptxIntroduction to ComputersMairaAshraf6
 
Thermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.ppt
Thermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.pptThermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.ppt
Thermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.pptDineshKumar4165
 
Orlando’s Arnold Palmer Hospital Layout Strategy-1.pptx
Orlando’s Arnold Palmer Hospital Layout Strategy-1.pptxOrlando’s Arnold Palmer Hospital Layout Strategy-1.pptx
Orlando’s Arnold Palmer Hospital Layout Strategy-1.pptxMuhammadAsimMuhammad6
 
Hospital management system project report.pdf
Hospital management system project report.pdfHospital management system project report.pdf
Hospital management system project report.pdfKamal Acharya
 
A CASE STUDY ON CERAMIC INDUSTRY OF BANGLADESH.pptx
A CASE STUDY ON CERAMIC INDUSTRY OF BANGLADESH.pptxA CASE STUDY ON CERAMIC INDUSTRY OF BANGLADESH.pptx
A CASE STUDY ON CERAMIC INDUSTRY OF BANGLADESH.pptxmaisarahman1
 

Dernier (20)

GEAR TRAIN- BASIC CONCEPTS AND WORKING PRINCIPLE
GEAR TRAIN- BASIC CONCEPTS AND WORKING PRINCIPLEGEAR TRAIN- BASIC CONCEPTS AND WORKING PRINCIPLE
GEAR TRAIN- BASIC CONCEPTS AND WORKING PRINCIPLE
 
Introduction to Serverless with AWS Lambda
Introduction to Serverless with AWS LambdaIntroduction to Serverless with AWS Lambda
Introduction to Serverless with AWS Lambda
 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
 
Employee leave management system project.
Employee leave management system project.Employee leave management system project.
Employee leave management system project.
 
Online electricity billing project report..pdf
Online electricity billing project report..pdfOnline electricity billing project report..pdf
Online electricity billing project report..pdf
 
Wadi Rum luxhotel lodge Analysis case study.pptx
Wadi Rum luxhotel lodge Analysis case study.pptxWadi Rum luxhotel lodge Analysis case study.pptx
Wadi Rum luxhotel lodge Analysis case study.pptx
 
Navigating Complexity: The Role of Trusted Partners and VIAS3D in Dassault Sy...
Navigating Complexity: The Role of Trusted Partners and VIAS3D in Dassault Sy...Navigating Complexity: The Role of Trusted Partners and VIAS3D in Dassault Sy...
Navigating Complexity: The Role of Trusted Partners and VIAS3D in Dassault Sy...
 
COST-EFFETIVE and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptx
COST-EFFETIVE  and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptxCOST-EFFETIVE  and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptx
COST-EFFETIVE and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptx
 
School management system project Report.pdf
School management system project Report.pdfSchool management system project Report.pdf
School management system project Report.pdf
 
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power PlayStandard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
 
HOA1&2 - Module 3 - PREHISTORCI ARCHITECTURE OF KERALA.pptx
HOA1&2 - Module 3 - PREHISTORCI ARCHITECTURE OF KERALA.pptxHOA1&2 - Module 3 - PREHISTORCI ARCHITECTURE OF KERALA.pptx
HOA1&2 - Module 3 - PREHISTORCI ARCHITECTURE OF KERALA.pptx
 
Call Girls in South Ex (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7
Call Girls in South Ex (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7Call Girls in South Ex (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7
Call Girls in South Ex (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7
 
Kuwait City MTP kit ((+919101817206)) Buy Abortion Pills Kuwait
Kuwait City MTP kit ((+919101817206)) Buy Abortion Pills KuwaitKuwait City MTP kit ((+919101817206)) Buy Abortion Pills Kuwait
Kuwait City MTP kit ((+919101817206)) Buy Abortion Pills Kuwait
 
DeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakes
DeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakesDeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakes
DeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakes
 
Engineering Drawing focus on projection of planes
Engineering Drawing focus on projection of planesEngineering Drawing focus on projection of planes
Engineering Drawing focus on projection of planes
 
Computer Lecture 01.pptxIntroduction to Computers
Computer Lecture 01.pptxIntroduction to ComputersComputer Lecture 01.pptxIntroduction to Computers
Computer Lecture 01.pptxIntroduction to Computers
 
Thermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.ppt
Thermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.pptThermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.ppt
Thermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.ppt
 
Orlando’s Arnold Palmer Hospital Layout Strategy-1.pptx
Orlando’s Arnold Palmer Hospital Layout Strategy-1.pptxOrlando’s Arnold Palmer Hospital Layout Strategy-1.pptx
Orlando’s Arnold Palmer Hospital Layout Strategy-1.pptx
 
Hospital management system project report.pdf
Hospital management system project report.pdfHospital management system project report.pdf
Hospital management system project report.pdf
 
A CASE STUDY ON CERAMIC INDUSTRY OF BANGLADESH.pptx
A CASE STUDY ON CERAMIC INDUSTRY OF BANGLADESH.pptxA CASE STUDY ON CERAMIC INDUSTRY OF BANGLADESH.pptx
A CASE STUDY ON CERAMIC INDUSTRY OF BANGLADESH.pptx
 

Ericsson interview

  • 1. Step Description Value (30 % HARQ) 1 eNBProcessingDelay(S1-U->Uu) 1 ms 2 Frame Alignment 1,022 ms 3 TTI for DL DATA PACKET 0,675 ms 4 HARQ Retransmission 0,3 * 5 ms 5 UE ProcessingDelay 1 ms 6 S1-U TransferDelayand aGW 7 ms (Note) Total one way delay 12,2 ms NOTE: The delaybudgetwasmeasuredinproductionenvironments,The S1-Udelayisbandwith depended. Speech pathdelay Jitter is defined as a variation in the delay of received packets. The sending side transmits packets in a continuous stream and spaces them evenly apart. Because of network congestion, improper queuing, or configuration errors, the delay betweenpackets can vary instead of remaining constant, as shown in the figure. n the RRC you can increase jtter buffer size and delay. Try to use larger RTP package, test with 40ms. Lower audio quality = 0 can be a solution. That's about what you can do locally in the RRCs ncrease rx jitter buffer to min 12+ - increase rx jitter delay to min 10+ - audio packet size 20 or 40 Jitter is a variation in packet transit delay caused by queuing, contention and serialization effects on the path through the network. In general, higher levels ofjitter are more likely to occur on either slow or heavily congested links.
  • 2. Delay and latency are similar terms that refer to the amount of time it takes a bit to be transmitted from source to destination. Jitter is delay that varies over time. One way to view latency is how long a system holds on to a packet. ... The speed of a system is affected by congestion and delays. Jitter in IP networks is the variation in the latency on a packet flow between two systems, when some packets take longer to travel from one system to the other.Jitter results from network congestion, timing drift and route changes Handover interruption delay HybridARQ enabledRate adaptationbasedonCQIfeedbackRLCAMmode Multiple bearersQoS scheduler Duringhandoverprocess,forsome period,userequipments cannotexchangeuserplane packetswith any of the base stations.Thisperiodisknownashandoverinterruptiontime.Itincludesthe time requiredtoexecute anyradioaccessnetworkprocedure,radioresourcecontrol signaling,orother message exchanges betweenthe userequipmentandthe radioaccessnetwork.The impactof intraLTE- Advancedhandoversoninterruptiontimeislessthanorequal to that providedbyhandoversinLTE.In LTE-Advanced,sub-framesize,alsoknownasTransmissionTime Interval (TTI),of 1msmakesitcapable of adaptingtofast changingradiolinkconditionsandallowsexploitationof multiuserdiversity[7].In LTE-Advanced,processingdelaysindifferentnodesandRACHschedulingperiodare reducedin comparisontoLTE. RACH cycle isdecreasedfrom5.0ms to1.0ms. Thistutorial outlinesthe procedures involvedinhandoverprocessandanalyzesthe performance of handoverinterruptiontimeforbothFDD and TDD modes.The paperis organizedasfollows:SectionIIexplainsthe minimumrequirementssetby IMT-Advancedandassumptionsof analysis.SectionIII presentsthe analysisof handoverinterruptiontimebeforethe conclusionsare drawninSectionIV.II. REQUIREMENTS & ASSUMPTIONSA.MinimumRequirementsThe IMT-Advancedproposal shallbe able to supporthandoverinterruptiontimesspecifiedinTable I[8].TABLE I IMT-A REQUIREMENTS Handover Type InterruptionTime (ms) Intra-Frequency27.4Inter-FrequencyWithinaspectrumband40.0 Betweenspectrumbands60.0 B. AssumptionsHandoverInterruptiontime forintra-frequencyand interfrequencyisthe same asitdoesnot dependonthe frequencyof the targetcell aslongas the cell has alreadybeenmeasuredbythe UserEquipment(UE),whichisatypical scenario[8].Forthe purposes of determininghandoverinterruptiontime,interactionswiththe core network(i.e.,networkentities beyondthe radioaccessnetwork) are assumedtooccur in zerotime.Itis alsoassumedthatall
  • 3. necessaryattributesof the targetchannel (thatis,downlinksynchronizationisachievedanduplink access procedures,if applicable,are successfullycompleted) are knownatinitiationof the handover fromthe servingchannel tothe targetchannel [9].ForanalysisRACHand PUCCH cycle istakenas 1ms. The RACH and PUCCH waitingtimesinTDDcases are calculatedbasedonthe UL/DL sub-frame locations inthe respective frame configurations.InTDDmode analysis,frame configuration1isconsidered.III. ANALYSISThe intra- andinter-frequencyhandoverinterruptiontime iscalculatedbasedonthe handoverprocedure showninfigure 3.The stepsinvolvedinhandoverinterruptionare:1) Radio Synchronizationtothe targetcell.2) Average delaydue toRandomAccessCHannel (RACH) scheduling period.3) RACH Preamble Transmission.4) Preamble detectionatTargeteNodeB.5) Transmissionof RandomAccess(RA) - Time betweenthe RA responsetransmissionandUE’s receptionof scheduling grant. 6) Decodingof schedulinggrantandtimingalignmentatUE. 7) Transmissionof data.Radio synchronizationdelayisthe sumof the delaycausedbyfrequencysynchronizationanddownlink synchronization.Frequencysynchronizationdelaydependsonwhetherthe targetcell isoperatingon the same carrier frequencyasthe servingcell.Butsince the UE has alreadyidentifiedand When the phone at the opposite end of the connection receives the RTP packets, it must reassemble them back into an audio signal. If packets are missing, the audio signal will contain gaps. This packet loss can be caused by a number of network problems. One common cause of packet loss is congested WAN links. There are two types of EPS bearers: default and dedicated. In the LTE network, the EPS bearer QoS is controlled using the following LTE QoS parameters: ▶ Resource Type: GBR or Non-GBR ▶ QoS Parameters  QCI  ARP  GBR  MBR  APN-AMBR  UE-AMBR Every EPS bearer must have QI and ARP defined. The QCI is particularly important because it serves as reference in determining QoS level for each EPS bearer. In case of bandwidth (bit rate), GBR and MBR are defined only in GBR type EPS bearers, whereas AMBR (APN-AMBR and UE-AMBR) is defined only in Non-GBR type EPS bearers. Below, we will explain the LTE QoS parameters one by one. Resource Type = GBR (Guaranteed Bit Rate) For an EPS bearer, having a GBR resource type means the bandwidth of the bearer is
  • 4. guaranteed. Obviously, a GBR type EPS bearer has a "guaranteed bit rate" associated (GBR will be further explained below) as one of its QoS parameters. Only a dedicated EPS bearer can be a GBR type bearer and no default EPS bearer can be GBR type. The QCI of a GBR type EPS bearer can range from 1 to 4. Resource Type = Non-GBR For an EPS bearer, having a non-GBR resource type means that the bearer is a best effort type bearer and its bandwidth is not guaranteed. A default EPS bearer is always a Non-GBR bearer, whereas a dedicated EPS bearer can be either GBR or non-GBR. The QCI of a non-GBR type EPS bearer can range from 5 to 9. QCI (QoS Class Identifier) QCI, in an integer from 1 to 9, indicates nine different QoS performance characteristics of each IP packet. QCI values are standardized to reference specific QoS characteristics, and each QCI contains standardized performance characteristics (values), such as resource type (GBR or non-GBR), priority (1~9), Packet Delay Budget (allowed packet delay shown in values ranging from 50 ms to 300 ms), Packet Error Loss Rate (allowed packet loss shown in values from 10-2 to 10-6. For more specific values, search on Google for "3GPP TS 23.203" and see Table 6.1.7 in the document. For example, QCI 1 and 9 are defined as follows: QCI = 1 : Resource Type = GBR, Priority = 2, Packet Delay Budget = 100ms, Packet Error Loss Rate = 10-2 , Example Service = Voice QCI = 9 : Resource Type = Non-GBR, Priority = 9, Packet Delay Budget = 300ms, Packet Error Loss Rate = 10-6, Example Service = Internet QoS to be guaranteed for an EPS bearer or SDF varies depending on the QCI values specified. QCI, though a single integer, represents node-specific parameters that give the details of how an LTE node handles packet forwarding (e.g. scheduling weights, admission thresholds, queue thresholds, link layer protocol configuration, etc). Network operators have their LTE nodes pre-configured to handle packet forwarding according to the QCI value. By pre-defining the performance characteristics of each QCI value and having them standardized, the network operators can ensure the same minimum level QoS required by the LTE standards is provided to different services/applications used in an LTE network consisting of various nodes from multi-vendors. QCI values seem to be mostly used by eNBs in controlling the priority of packets delivered over radio links. That's because practically it is not easy for S-GW or P-GW, in a wired link, to process packets and also forward them based on the QCI characteristics all at the same time (As you may know, a Cisco or Juniper router would not care about delay or error loss rate when it processes QoS of packets. It would merely decide which packet to send first through scheduling (WFQ, DWRR, SPQ, etc.) based on the priority of the packets (802.1p/DSCP/MPLS EXP)). ARP (Allocation and Retention Priority)
  • 5. When a new EPS bearer is needed in an LTE network with insufficient resources, an LTE entity (e.g. P-GW, S-GW or eNB) decides, based on ARP (an integer ranging from 1 to 15, with 1 being the highest level of priority), whether to:  remove the existing EPS bearer and create a new one (e.g. removing an EPS bearer with low priority ARP to create one with high priority ARP); or  refuse to create a new one. So, the ARP is considered only when deciding whether to create a new EPS bearer or not. Once a new bearer is created and packets are delivered through it, the ARP does not affect the priority of the delivered packet, and thus the network node/entity forwards the packets regardless of their ARP values. One of the most representative examples of using the ARP is an emergency VoIP call. So, an existing EPS bearer can be removed if a new one is required for a emergency 119 (911 in US, 112 in EC, etc) VoIP call. GBR (UL/DL) This parameter is used for a GBR type bearer, and indicates the bandwidth (bit rate) to be guaranteed by the LTE network. It is not applied to a non-GBR bearer with no guaranteed bandwidth (UL is for uplink traffic and DL is for downlink traffic). MBR (UL/DL) MBR is used for a GBR type bearer, and indicates the maximum bit rate allowed in the LTE network. Any packets arriving at the bearer after the specified MBR is exceeded will be discarded. APN-AMBR (UL/DL) As you read the foregoing paragraph, you may wonder why a non-GBR type bearer does not have a "bandwidth limit"? In case of non-GBR bearers, it is the total bandwidth of all the non-GBR EPS bearers in a PDN that is limited, not the individual bandwidth of each bearer. And this restriction is controlled by APN-AMBR (UL/DL). As seen in the figure above, there are two non-GBR EPS bearers, and their maximum bandwidths are specified by the APN-AMBR (UL/DL). This parameter is applied at UE (for UL traffic only) and P-GW (for both DL and UL traffic). UE-AMBR (UL/DL) In the figure above, APN-AMBR and UE-AMBR look the same. But, please take a look at the one below. A UE can be connected to more than one PDN (e.g. PDN 1 for Internet, PDN 2 for VoIP using IMS, etc.) and it has one unique IP address for each of its all PDN connections. Here, UE-AMBR (UL/DL) indicates the maximum bandwidth allowed for all the non- GBR EPS bearers associated to the UE no matter how many PDN connections the UE has. Other PDNs are connected through other P-GWs, this parameter is applied by eNBs only. How SRVCC works
  • 6. The SRVCC implementation controls the transfer of calls in both directions. LTE to legacy network handover Handover from LTE to the legacy network is required when the user moves out of the LTE coverage area. Using SRVCC, the handover is undertaken in two stages.  Radio Access Technology transfer: The handover for the radio access network and this is a well-established protocol that is in use for transfers from 3G to 2G for example.  Session transfer: The session transfer is the new element that is required for SRVCC. It is required to move the access control and voice media anchoring from the Evolved Packet Core, EPC of the packet switched LTE network to the legacy circuit switched network. During the handover process the CSCF within the IMS architecture maintains the control of the whole operation. Voice handover using SRVCC on LTE The SRVCC handover process takes place in a number of steps: 1. The handover process is initiated by a request for session transfer from the IMS CSCF. 2. The IMS CSCF responds simultaneously with two commands, one to the LTE network, and the other to the legacy network. 3. the LTE network receives a radio Access Network handover execution command through the MME and LTE RAN. This instructs the user device to prepare to move to a circuit switched network for the voice call. 4. The destination legacy circuit switched network receives a session transfer response preparing it to accept the call from the LTE network. 5. After all the commands have been executed and acknowledged the call is switched to the legacy network with the IMS CSCF still in control of the call. Legacy network to LTE When returning a call to the LTE network much of the same functionality is again used. To ensure the VoLTE device is able to return to the LTE RAN from the legacy RAN, there are two options the legacy RAN can implement to provide a swift and effective return:
  • 7.  Allow LTE information to be broadcast on the legacy RAN so the LTE device is able to perform the cell reselection more easily.  Simultaneously release the connection to the user device and redirect it to the LTE RAN. SRVCC interruption performance One of the key issues with VoLTE and SRVCC is the interruption time when handing over from an LTE RAN to a legacy RAN. The key methodology behind reducing he time is to simultaneous perform the redirections of RAN and session. In this way the user experience is maintained and the actual interruption time is not unduly noticeable. It has been found that the session redirection is the faster of the two handovers, and therefore it is necessary for the overall handover methodology to accommodate the fact that there are difference between the two.