Soumettre la recherche
Mettre en ligne
Workplace wellness-initiatives-survey-findings
•
Télécharger en tant que PPTX, PDF
•
5 j'aime
•
6,660 vues
S
shrm
Suivre
Signaler
Partager
Signaler
Partager
1 sur 59
Télécharger maintenant
Recommandé
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Carr...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Carr...
shrm
SHRM Survey Findings: Smoking in the Workplace
SHRM Survey Findings: Smoking in the Workplace
shrm
Health care
Health care
shrm
2015 Strategic Benefits—Wellness Initiatives
2015 Strategic Benefits—Wellness Initiatives
shrm
2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
shrm
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Communicating Benefits
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Communicating Benefits
shrm
Shrm us travel-vacation-benefits-workplace-impact
Shrm us travel-vacation-benefits-workplace-impact
shrm
SHRM Health Care Reform 2015 Update
SHRM Health Care Reform 2015 Update
shrm
Recommandé
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Carr...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Carr...
shrm
SHRM Survey Findings: Smoking in the Workplace
SHRM Survey Findings: Smoking in the Workplace
shrm
Health care
Health care
shrm
2015 Strategic Benefits—Wellness Initiatives
2015 Strategic Benefits—Wellness Initiatives
shrm
2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
shrm
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Communicating Benefits
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Communicating Benefits
shrm
Shrm us travel-vacation-benefits-workplace-impact
Shrm us travel-vacation-benefits-workplace-impact
shrm
SHRM Health Care Reform 2015 Update
SHRM Health Care Reform 2015 Update
shrm
2015 Strategic Benefits―Flexible Work Arragements
2015 Strategic Benefits―Flexible Work Arragements
shrm
2015 HR Perspectives on Overtime Exemptions
2015 HR Perspectives on Overtime Exemptions
shrm
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
shrm
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
shrm
Flexible work-arrangements
Flexible work-arrangements
shrm
Sustainable workplace-practices
Sustainable workplace-practices
shrm
Leveraging benefits-to-retain
Leveraging benefits-to-retain
shrm
SHRM/EBRI 2014 Health Benefits Survey
SHRM/EBRI 2014 Health Benefits Survey
John Smith
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Wellness Initiatives
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Wellness Initiatives
shrm
SHRM Survey Findings
SHRM Survey Findings
shrm
2014 employee-financial-stress-final
2014 employee-financial-stress-final
shrm
Internships
Internships
shrm
2014 shrm employment verification survey findings
2014 shrm employment verification survey findings
shrm
Preparing for-an-aging-workforce-gap-analysis-research
Preparing for-an-aging-workforce-gap-analysis-research
shrm
Policies for Marijuana Use in the Workplace
Policies for Marijuana Use in the Workplace
shrm
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...
shrm
2015 Strategic Benefits―Assessment and Communication of Benefits
2015 Strategic Benefits―Assessment and Communication of Benefits
shrm
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
shrm
2013 Office Pool Survey
2013 Office Pool Survey
shrm
Policies on Politics in the Workplace
Policies on Politics in the Workplace
shrm
Corporate Presentation, For Management Or Hr Dir
Corporate Presentation, For Management Or Hr Dir
Robo86
How To Create Value In The Workplace
How To Create Value In The Workplace
Crimson Cup Coffee & Tea
Contenu connexe
Tendances
2015 Strategic Benefits―Flexible Work Arragements
2015 Strategic Benefits―Flexible Work Arragements
shrm
2015 HR Perspectives on Overtime Exemptions
2015 HR Perspectives on Overtime Exemptions
shrm
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
shrm
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
shrm
Flexible work-arrangements
Flexible work-arrangements
shrm
Sustainable workplace-practices
Sustainable workplace-practices
shrm
Leveraging benefits-to-retain
Leveraging benefits-to-retain
shrm
SHRM/EBRI 2014 Health Benefits Survey
SHRM/EBRI 2014 Health Benefits Survey
John Smith
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Wellness Initiatives
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Wellness Initiatives
shrm
SHRM Survey Findings
SHRM Survey Findings
shrm
2014 employee-financial-stress-final
2014 employee-financial-stress-final
shrm
Internships
Internships
shrm
2014 shrm employment verification survey findings
2014 shrm employment verification survey findings
shrm
Preparing for-an-aging-workforce-gap-analysis-research
Preparing for-an-aging-workforce-gap-analysis-research
shrm
Policies for Marijuana Use in the Workplace
Policies for Marijuana Use in the Workplace
shrm
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...
shrm
2015 Strategic Benefits―Assessment and Communication of Benefits
2015 Strategic Benefits―Assessment and Communication of Benefits
shrm
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
shrm
2013 Office Pool Survey
2013 Office Pool Survey
shrm
Policies on Politics in the Workplace
Policies on Politics in the Workplace
shrm
Tendances
(20)
2015 Strategic Benefits―Flexible Work Arragements
2015 Strategic Benefits―Flexible Work Arragements
2015 HR Perspectives on Overtime Exemptions
2015 HR Perspectives on Overtime Exemptions
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
Flexible work-arrangements
Flexible work-arrangements
Sustainable workplace-practices
Sustainable workplace-practices
Leveraging benefits-to-retain
Leveraging benefits-to-retain
SHRM/EBRI 2014 Health Benefits Survey
SHRM/EBRI 2014 Health Benefits Survey
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Wellness Initiatives
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Wellness Initiatives
SHRM Survey Findings
SHRM Survey Findings
2014 employee-financial-stress-final
2014 employee-financial-stress-final
Internships
Internships
2014 shrm employment verification survey findings
2014 shrm employment verification survey findings
Preparing for-an-aging-workforce-gap-analysis-research
Preparing for-an-aging-workforce-gap-analysis-research
Policies for Marijuana Use in the Workplace
Policies for Marijuana Use in the Workplace
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...
2015 Strategic Benefits―Assessment and Communication of Benefits
2015 Strategic Benefits―Assessment and Communication of Benefits
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
2013 Office Pool Survey
2013 Office Pool Survey
Policies on Politics in the Workplace
Policies on Politics in the Workplace
En vedette
Corporate Presentation, For Management Or Hr Dir
Corporate Presentation, For Management Or Hr Dir
Robo86
How To Create Value In The Workplace
How To Create Value In The Workplace
Crimson Cup Coffee & Tea
Workplace Wellness 2.0
Workplace Wellness 2.0
HPCareer.Net / State of Wellness Inc.
State of Wellness: Minnesota, Policies, Systems and Environmental Changes wit...
State of Wellness: Minnesota, Policies, Systems and Environmental Changes wit...
HPCareer.Net / State of Wellness Inc.
State of Wellness: NC
State of Wellness: NC
HPCareer.Net / State of Wellness Inc.
The Worksite Wellness Revolution
The Worksite Wellness Revolution
Darren White
Workplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 National Survey
Workplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 National Survey
healthiermn
FBE Manchester - Wellness in the Workplace - 19th July 2016
FBE Manchester - Wellness in the Workplace - 19th July 2016
FBE Manchester
Workplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 Hawaii
Workplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 Hawaii
healthiermn
Memories versus Monetary Rewards
Memories versus Monetary Rewards
Todd Farina, MHA,BSN,RN
ROLE OF A MANAGER
ROLE OF A MANAGER
Sandip Kumar Sahoo
Sorting Out the Wellness Puzzle for Worksite Wellness with What to do about c...
Sorting Out the Wellness Puzzle for Worksite Wellness with What to do about c...
Cindy Cohen RN, BS BA
The role of manager in a changing world v3
The role of manager in a changing world v3
Madhur Kathuria
Diana Pangestu - Presentation on Corporate Wellness
Diana Pangestu - Presentation on Corporate Wellness
dianity27
Corporate wellness
Corporate wellness
edet umoh, DVM
Wellness Benefits Survey Ppt 8 11
Wellness Benefits Survey Ppt 8 11
bobsm01
Corporate wellness program design
Corporate wellness program design
wellsource10789
Solving Problems in Workplace Wellness Programs
Solving Problems in Workplace Wellness Programs
HPCareer.Net / State of Wellness Inc.
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...
shrm
Hiring 2013-college-graduates
Hiring 2013-college-graduates
shrm
En vedette
(20)
Corporate Presentation, For Management Or Hr Dir
Corporate Presentation, For Management Or Hr Dir
How To Create Value In The Workplace
How To Create Value In The Workplace
Workplace Wellness 2.0
Workplace Wellness 2.0
State of Wellness: Minnesota, Policies, Systems and Environmental Changes wit...
State of Wellness: Minnesota, Policies, Systems and Environmental Changes wit...
State of Wellness: NC
State of Wellness: NC
The Worksite Wellness Revolution
The Worksite Wellness Revolution
Workplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 National Survey
Workplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 National Survey
FBE Manchester - Wellness in the Workplace - 19th July 2016
FBE Manchester - Wellness in the Workplace - 19th July 2016
Workplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 Hawaii
Workplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 Hawaii
Memories versus Monetary Rewards
Memories versus Monetary Rewards
ROLE OF A MANAGER
ROLE OF A MANAGER
Sorting Out the Wellness Puzzle for Worksite Wellness with What to do about c...
Sorting Out the Wellness Puzzle for Worksite Wellness with What to do about c...
The role of manager in a changing world v3
The role of manager in a changing world v3
Diana Pangestu - Presentation on Corporate Wellness
Diana Pangestu - Presentation on Corporate Wellness
Corporate wellness
Corporate wellness
Wellness Benefits Survey Ppt 8 11
Wellness Benefits Survey Ppt 8 11
Corporate wellness program design
Corporate wellness program design
Solving Problems in Workplace Wellness Programs
Solving Problems in Workplace Wellness Programs
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...
Hiring 2013-college-graduates
Hiring 2013-college-graduates
Similaire à Workplace wellness-initiatives-survey-findings
2013 benefit strategies health-care
2013 benefit strategies health-care
shrm
Shrm poll health_care2_seniormanagement
Shrm poll health_care2_seniormanagement
shrm
Creating a Culture of Heath at Work
Creating a Culture of Heath at Work
MEECO Leadership Development Institute
Wellness initiatives
Wellness initiatives
shrm
Shrm survey findings-strategic-benefits-wellness-initiatives
Shrm survey findings-strategic-benefits-wellness-initiatives
SHRMRESEARCH
Cdph poll final
Cdph poll final
shrm
2015 Strategic Benefits―Health Care
2015 Strategic Benefits―Health Care
shrm
Global Workplace Health and Wellness by GCC
Global Workplace Health and Wellness by GCC
nutritionistrepublic
2013 benefit strategies wellness-initiatives
2013 benefit strategies wellness-initiatives
shrm
Workplace Wellness And Why It Is Important For Your Organisation, Chandra Dalmia
Workplace Wellness And Why It Is Important For Your Organisation, Chandra Dalmia
The HR Observer
SMGs 2017-corporate-wellbeing-report
SMGs 2017-corporate-wellbeing-report
Waqas Kamran Ahmad
Health in the Workplace Report - 2017
Health in the Workplace Report - 2017
Sam Wheway
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
shrm
Part 4: Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Part 4: Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
shrm
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
shrm
Shrm survey findings_strategic-benefits-health-care
Shrm survey findings_strategic-benefits-health-care
SHRMRESEARCH
Occupational health Strategy & Planning: Dr. Ramnik Parekh
Occupational health Strategy & Planning: Dr. Ramnik Parekh
Cairn India Limited
2013 benefits strategies leveraging-benefits-to-retain
2013 benefits strategies leveraging-benefits-to-retain
shrm
2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
shrm
Motivation Show Presentation Final20121005
Motivation Show Presentation Final20121005
mjemoff
Similaire à Workplace wellness-initiatives-survey-findings
(20)
2013 benefit strategies health-care
2013 benefit strategies health-care
Shrm poll health_care2_seniormanagement
Shrm poll health_care2_seniormanagement
Creating a Culture of Heath at Work
Creating a Culture of Heath at Work
Wellness initiatives
Wellness initiatives
Shrm survey findings-strategic-benefits-wellness-initiatives
Shrm survey findings-strategic-benefits-wellness-initiatives
Cdph poll final
Cdph poll final
2015 Strategic Benefits―Health Care
2015 Strategic Benefits―Health Care
Global Workplace Health and Wellness by GCC
Global Workplace Health and Wellness by GCC
2013 benefit strategies wellness-initiatives
2013 benefit strategies wellness-initiatives
Workplace Wellness And Why It Is Important For Your Organisation, Chandra Dalmia
Workplace Wellness And Why It Is Important For Your Organisation, Chandra Dalmia
SMGs 2017-corporate-wellbeing-report
SMGs 2017-corporate-wellbeing-report
Health in the Workplace Report - 2017
Health in the Workplace Report - 2017
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
Part 4: Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Part 4: Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Shrm survey findings_strategic-benefits-health-care
Shrm survey findings_strategic-benefits-health-care
Occupational health Strategy & Planning: Dr. Ramnik Parekh
Occupational health Strategy & Planning: Dr. Ramnik Parekh
2013 benefits strategies leveraging-benefits-to-retain
2013 benefits strategies leveraging-benefits-to-retain
2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Motivation Show Presentation Final20121005
Motivation Show Presentation Final20121005
Plus de shrm
SHRM Poll on Personality Tests for the Hiring and Promotion of Employees
SHRM Poll on Personality Tests for the Hiring and Promotion of Employees
shrm
Shrm survey findings using competencies to achieve business unit success final
Shrm survey findings using competencies to achieve business unit success final
shrm
SHRM Survey Findings: Using Social Media for Talent Acquisition—Recruitment a...
SHRM Survey Findings: Using Social Media for Talent Acquisition—Recruitment a...
shrm
SHRM Survey Findings: 2015 End-of-Year/Holiday Activities
SHRM Survey Findings: 2015 End-of-Year/Holiday Activities
shrm
SHRM 2016 Holiday Schedules
SHRM 2016 Holiday Schedules
shrm
SHRM/Ascendo Resources: The Importance of Social Media for Recruiters and Job...
SHRM/Ascendo Resources: The Importance of Social Media for Recruiters and Job...
shrm
Shrm healthy foodspoll08152010_final
Shrm healthy foodspoll08152010_final
shrm
SHRM/Globoforce Employee Recognition Programs—2015
SHRM/Globoforce Employee Recognition Programs—2015
shrm
The Hiring of 2015 College Graduates
The Hiring of 2015 College Graduates
shrm
Preparing for an Aging Workforce: A Gap Analysis
Preparing for an Aging Workforce: A Gap Analysis
shrm
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Flexible Work Arrangements
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Flexible Work Arrangements
shrm
Strategic Benefits--Communicating Benefits
Strategic Benefits--Communicating Benefits
shrm
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
shrm
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
shrm
Plus de shrm
(14)
SHRM Poll on Personality Tests for the Hiring and Promotion of Employees
SHRM Poll on Personality Tests for the Hiring and Promotion of Employees
Shrm survey findings using competencies to achieve business unit success final
Shrm survey findings using competencies to achieve business unit success final
SHRM Survey Findings: Using Social Media for Talent Acquisition—Recruitment a...
SHRM Survey Findings: Using Social Media for Talent Acquisition—Recruitment a...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2015 End-of-Year/Holiday Activities
SHRM Survey Findings: 2015 End-of-Year/Holiday Activities
SHRM 2016 Holiday Schedules
SHRM 2016 Holiday Schedules
SHRM/Ascendo Resources: The Importance of Social Media for Recruiters and Job...
SHRM/Ascendo Resources: The Importance of Social Media for Recruiters and Job...
Shrm healthy foodspoll08152010_final
Shrm healthy foodspoll08152010_final
SHRM/Globoforce Employee Recognition Programs—2015
SHRM/Globoforce Employee Recognition Programs—2015
The Hiring of 2015 College Graduates
The Hiring of 2015 College Graduates
Preparing for an Aging Workforce: A Gap Analysis
Preparing for an Aging Workforce: A Gap Analysis
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Flexible Work Arrangements
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Flexible Work Arrangements
Strategic Benefits--Communicating Benefits
Strategic Benefits--Communicating Benefits
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Workplace wellness-initiatives-survey-findings
1.
SHRM Survey Findings: Workplace
Wellness Initiatives In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota December 6, 2012 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota
2.
Definitions
Worksite wellness initiatives: For the purpose of this survey, worksite wellness initiatives can be defined as a coordinated set of strategies that includes environmental supports, health benefits and workplace policies designed to meet the health and safety needs of all employees. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 2
3.
Key Findings
How much do organizations spend on health insurance coverage for employees? Of the organizations that offer a health care plan for their employees, approximately three-fourths (76%) of organizations spend less than 25% of their organization’s operating budget on health insurance coverage for employees, whereas nearly one-fifth (19%) of organizations spend 25% to 49%. How would organizations grade their employees’ health? Over half (54%) of organizations would give their employees’ health a “B – Good” rating, whereas 38% of organizations would rate their employees’ health as “C – Fair.” How important are health-related issues in terms of overall organizational priorities? Nearly one-half (49%) of organizations indicated that health insurance costs are “extremely important to their organization.” Next on the list were decreased productivity (35%), absenteeism (30%) and workers’ compensation or disability claims (27%). What are the top health conditions that are of greatest concern to employees? Roughly one-fourth of organizations reported obesity/overweight (24%) and stress and other mental health issues (23%) as the greatest health concerns for their employees. Other health concerns include lack of exercise/fitness (15%), chronic disease (11%) and high blood pressure (10%). Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 3
4.
Key Findings (Continued)
How do organizations feel about worksite wellness initiatives? Nearly nine out of ten (87%) organizations indicated that worksite wellness initiatives are very or somewhat beneficial. Practically all (96%) organizations reported that they strongly or somewhat agreed that the initiatives help workers develop healthier lifestyles. The majority (84%) of organizations also strongly or somewhat agree that worksite wellness initiatives lower health care costs and increase worker productivity. Do organizations offer worksite wellness initiatives? Slightly more than one-half (55%) of organizations have a worksite wellness initiative for their employees. The majority (76%) of those organizations indicated that less than 10% of their operating budget is spent on these worksite wellness initiatives. Do organizations plan to expand or improve their current worksite wellness initiative? Of the organizations that currently offer worksite wellness initiatives, 85% are very or somewhat interested in expanding or improving their current worksite wellness initiative in the next one to three years. Do organizations plan to develop worksite wellness initiatives for their employees? For organizations that do not currently offer a worksite wellness initiative, 69% of them are very or somewhat interested in developing one in the next one to three years. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 4
5.
Key Findings (Continued)
Do organizations track the return on investment (ROI) of worksite wellness initiatives? Of the organizations that offer worksite wellness initiatives, roughly two-fifths (42%) of organizations track the return on investment (ROI) on these initiatives. What reasons may deter organizations from offering a worksite wellness initiative? About three-fifths of organizations reported the cost of the initiative (65%) and lack of employee interests/expected low levels of participation (59%) as the most common factors that may deter organizations from offering a worksite wellness initiative. What resources do organizations rely on when creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative? Over one-half of organizations trust and value their business peers or fellow HR managers (58%), health care service providers (55%) and/or worksite wellness vendors and consultants (54%) when creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative. Should the government become more involved in worksite wellness initiatives? Nearly one-half (47%) of organizations indicated that state and local government should be more active in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives, although two-fifths (40%) of organizations indicated that the federal government should not really change its level of involvement. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 5
6.
General Health Insurance
Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 6
7.
Approximately what percentage
of your organization’s operating budget would you say is spent on health insurance coverage for your employees? Less than 25% 76% 25 – 49% 19% 50 – 74% 4% 75% or more 1% Note: n = 267. Only respondents whose organizations offer health care plans were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 7
8.
Wellness Themes
Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 8
9.
What grade would
you give your organization’s employees in terms of being healthy? A – Excellent 4% B – Good 54% C – Fair 38% D – Poor 4% F – Failing 0% n = 403 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 9
10.
What grade would
you give your organization’s employees in terms of being healthy? Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 1 to 99 employees are more likely than organizations with 500 to 24,999 employees to grade their employees’ health as B – Good. Comparisons by organization staff size 500 to 2,499 employees (39%) 1 to 99 employees (67%) > 2,500 to 24,999 employees (46%) • Organizations with 500 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to grade their employees’ health as C – Fair. Comparisons by organization staff size 500 to 2,499 employees (54%) > 1 to 99 employees (23%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 10
11.
Rate the importance
of the following issues in terms of overall organization priorities: 1 = Not 10 = Important Extremely 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 At All to Important to Organization Organization Health insurance 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 7% 17% 18% 49% costs (n = 404) Decreased productivity 1% 0% 1% 2% 5% 6% 11% 18% 20% 35% (n = 402) Absenteeism 1% 2% 2% 2% 6% 6% 11% 19% 21% 30% (n = 401) Workers’ compensation or disability 2% 3% 3% 5% 9% 6% 12% 16% 15% 27% claims (n = 402) Note: Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 11
12.
Rate the importance
of the following issues in terms of overall organization priorities: Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 500 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees to rate health insurance costs a 9 on level of importance (1 = not important at all to organization, 10 = extremely important to organization). Comparisons by organization staff size 500 to 2,499 employees (31%) > 2,500 to 24,999 employees (11%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 12
13.
Which from the
list below do you consider to be the top three health conditions or areas that you feel are the greatest concern to your organization’s employees? Rank them in terms of your first, second and third choice. First Choice Second Choice Third Choice (n = 405) (n = 404) (n = 403) Obesity/overweight 24% 17% 12% Stress and other mental health issues 23% 14% 14% Lack of exercise/fitness 15% 19% 17% Chronic diseases 11% 11% 11% High blood pressure 10% 12% 12% Tobacco use 7% 3% 8% Workplace injuries 6% 2% 5% High cholesterol 1% 7% 5% Alcohol and substance abuse 1% 2% 4% Poor nutrition 1% 7% 9% Cold and flu vaccinations 1% 5% 4% Note: Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 13
14.
Which from the
list below do you consider to be the top three health conditions or areas that you feel are the greatest concern to your organization’s employees? Rank them in terms of your first, second and third choice. Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to rank obesity/overweight as the top health concern for their employees. Comparisons by organization staff size 2,500 to 24,999 employees (34%) > 1 to 99 employees (13%) Comparisons by organization sector • Publicly owned for-profit organizations are more likely than privately owned for-profit organizations and nonprofit organizations to rank tobacco use as the second top health concern for their employees. Comparisons by organization sector Privately owned for-profit (2%) Publicly owned for-profit (10%) > Nonprofit (1%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 14
15.
Worksite Wellness Initiatives
Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 15
16.
In general, how
beneficial would you say worksite wellness initiatives are to organizations like yours? Very beneficial 38% Somewhat beneficial 49% Not very beneficial 12% Not beneficial at all 1% n = 404 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 16
17.
In general, how
beneficial would you say worksite wellness initiatives are to organizations like yours? Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to consider their workplace wellness initiatives as “very beneficial.” Comparisons by organization staff size 2,500 to 24,999 employees (51%) > 1 to 99 employees (26%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 17
18.
Perspectives on Different
Viewpoints About Worksite Wellness Initiatives: Worksite wellness initiatives help workers develop healthier lifestyles. (n = 5% 56% 40% 400) Worksite wellness initiatives lower health care costs. (n = 401) 3% 13% 53% 31% Worksite wellness initiatives increase 2% 14% 61% 23% worker productivity. (n = 400) Worksite wellness initiatives reduce 2% 20% 59% 19% worker absenteeism. (n = 396) Worksite wellness initiatives only impact 10% 25% 47% 17% a limited number of workers. (n = 403) Worksite wellness initiatives make employees feel that their privacy is 13% 36% 44% 7% being intruded upon. (n = 400) Worksite wellness initiatives do little to improve overall worker health. 26% 48% 21% 5% (n = 401) Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree Note: n = 396 – 403. Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 18
19.
Does your organization
have a worksite wellness initiative? No Yes 45% 55% n = 406 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 19
20.
Does your organization
have a worksite wellness initiative? Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 100 or more employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to offer worksite wellness initiatives in their organization. • Organizations with 2,500 or more employees are more likely than organizations with 100 to 499 employees to offer worksite wellness initiatives in their organization. Comparisons by organization staff size 100 to 499 employees (52%) 500 to 2,499 employees (63%) > 1 to 99 employees (27%) 2,500 to 24,999 employees (80%) 25,000 or more employees (90%) 2,500 to 24,999 employees (80%) > 100 to 499 employees (52%) 25,000 or more employees (90%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 20
21.
Does your organization
have a worksite wellness initiative? Comparisons by organization sector • Publicly owned for-profit organizations are more likely than privately owned for-profit and nonprofit organizations to offer worksite wellness initiatives in their organization. • Government agencies are more likely than privately owned for-profit and nonprofit organizations to offer worksite wellness initiatives in their organization. Comparisons by organization sector Privately owned for-profit (45%) Publicly owned for-profit (75%) > Nonprofit (53%) Privately owned for-profit (45%) Government (83%) > Nonprofit (53%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 21
22.
Approximately what percentage
of your organization’s operating budget would you say is spent on worksite wellness initiatives that are separate from health insurance coverage? 0% 9% Less than 10% 76% 10 - 19% 12% 20% or more 3% Note: n = 168. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 22
23.
How many years
ago was your organization’s worksite wellness initiative first created? Less than 1 0% year 1 year 17% 2 years 18% 3 years 11% 4 years 10% 5 or more 44% years Note: n = 208. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 23
24.
To the best
of your knowledge, what are your organization’s reasons for offering a worksite wellness initiative? To improve the overall health of employees 92% To reduce employee health care costs 85% To improve employee 53% productivity To improve employee morale 52% To reduce employee 49% absenteeism To reduce the costs associated 34% with disability claims To attract and recruit employees 26% Was requested by employees 17% Worksite wellness initiatives were part of the existing health plan 16% To reduce employee turnover 16% rates Other 3% Note: n = 225. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 24
25.
To the best
of your knowledge, what are your organization’s reasons for offering a worksite wellness initiative? Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to indicate reducing health care costs as a reason to offer worksite wellness initiatives in their organization. Comparisons by organization staff size 2,500 to 24,999 employees (91%) > 1 to 99 employees (63%) Comparisons by organization sector • Nonprofit organizations and government agencies are more likely than privately owned for-profit organizations to indicate requested by employees as a reason to offer worksite wellness initiatives in their organization. Comparisons by organization sector Nonprofit (28%) > Privately owned for-profit (7%) Government (32%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 25
26.
Do employees who
participate in the worksite wellness initiative receive a financial incentive? Yes No 50% 50% Note: n = 224. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 26
27.
How interested is
your organization in expanding or improving your current worksite wellness initiative in the next one to three years? Very interested 40% Somewhat interested 45% Not very 12% interested Not interested 4% at all Note: n = 223. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 27
28.
How beneficial do
you think employees find your organization’s worksite wellness initiative to be? Very beneficial 15% Somewhat beneficial 76% Not very 8% beneficial Not beneficial 2% at all Note: n = 225. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 28
29.
How beneficial do
you think employees find your organization’s worksite wellness initiative to be? Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 500 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 100 to 499 employees to indicate that their employees find their organization’s worksite wellness initiatives to be very beneficial. Comparisons by organization staff size 500 to 499 employees (24%) > 100 to 499 employees (5%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 29
30.
How interested is
your organization in developing a worksite wellness initiative in the next one to three years? Very interested 27% Somewhat interested 42% Not very 21% interested Not interested 10% at all Note: n = 179. Only respondents whose organizations do not offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 30
31.
How interested is
your organization in developing a worksite wellness initiative in the next one to three years? Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 1 to 99 employees are more likely than organizations with 100 to 499 employees to indicate they are not interested at all in developing a worksite wellness initiative in the next one to three years. Comparisons by organization staff size 1 to 99 employees (18%) > 100 to 499 employees (3%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 31
32.
How beneficial would
your employees find a worksite wellness initiative if your organization created one? Very beneficial 18% Somewhat beneficial 65% Not very 15% beneficial Not beneficial 2% at all Note: n = 178. Only respondents whose organizations do not offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 32
33.
Based on your
experience, do you think that worksite wellness initiatives were effective in . . . Improving worker productivity at your 52% organization? (n = 221) Reducing your organization's health care 52% costs? (n = 222) Reducing worker absenteeism 47% at your organization? (n = 221) Note: n = 221 - 222. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Data shown reflect “yes” responses. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 33
34.
Business Strategy
Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 34
35.
My organization would
be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if: Health plans offered premium discounts or rebates for these 3% 6% 35% 56% initiatives. (n = 402) We could demonstrate a financial return on investment for these 1% 8% 37% 54% initiatives. (n = 402) The state and federal government provided tax incentives for these 7% 12% 36% 44% initiatives. (n = 397) It would help attract and retain 3% 14% 45% 40% talented employees. (n = 400) My employees actively requested 7% 19% 40% 35% such an initiative. (n = 400) There was a community initiative that recognized employers with 7% 25% 46% 22% healthy workplaces. (n = 400) Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree Note: Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 35
36.
My organization would
be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if: Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to “strongly agree” in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if financial return on these initiatives could be demonstrated. • Organizations with 500 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees to “somewhat disagree” that creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative would help attract and retain talented employees. Comparisons by organization staff size 2,500 to 24,999 employees (65%) > 1 to 99 employees (42%) 500 to 2,499 employees (20%) > 2,500 to 24,999 employees (4%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 36
37.
My organization would
be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if: Comparisons by organization sector • Government agencies are more likely than privately owned for-profit organizations to “somewhat agree” in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if employees actively requested such an initiative. • Government agencies are more likely than publicly owned for-profit organizations to “somewhat disagree” in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if state and federal government provided tax incentives for these initiatives. Comparisons by organization sector Government (60%) > Privately owned for-profit (33%) Government (28%) > Publicly owned for-profit (5%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 37
38.
Does your organization
track the return on investment (ROI) of its worksite wellness initiatives? Yes 42% No 58% Note: n = 217. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 38
39.
Does your organization
track the return on investment (ROI) of its worksite wellness initiatives? Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 500 or more employees are more likely than organizations with 100 to 499 employees to track the return on investment (ROI) of its worksite wellness initiatives. Comparisons by organization staff size 500 to 499 employees (47%) 2,500 to 24,999 employees (60%) > 100 to 499 employees (16%) 25,000 or more employees (68%) Comparisons by organization sector • Publicly owned for-profit organizations are more likely than privately owned for-profit and nonprofit organizations to track the return on investment (ROI) of its worksite wellness initiatives. Comparisons by organization sector Privately owned for-profit (36%) Publicly owned for-profit (61%) > Nonprofit (29%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 39
40.
How important is
it to your organization to have a measureable ROI (return on investment) one to three years from now in order to determine the value of worksite wellness initiatives? Very important 41% Somewhat important 43% Not very 14% important Not important at 1% all Note: n = 220. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 40
41.
How important is
it to your organization to have a measureable ROI (return on investment) one to three years from now in order to determine the value of worksite wellness initiatives? Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 500 to 24,999 employees are more likely than organizations with 100 to 499 employees to indicate having a measurable return on investment (ROI) one to three years from now in order to determine the value of its worksite wellness initiatives as “very important.” Comparisons by organization staff size 500 to 499 employees (58%) > 100 to 499 employees (25%) 2,500 to 24,999 employees (50%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 41
42.
Implementation Issues
Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 42
43.
Regardless of whether
you have a worksite wellness initiative at your organization or not, what are some of the reasons why organizations like yours often decide not to offer a worksite wellness initiative? Percentage Cost of the initiative (n = 392) 65% Lack of employee interest/expected low levels of participation (n = 392) 59% Lack of time (n = 392) 54% Management does not see the value of it (n = 392) 45% Employees do not see the value of it (n = 392) 42% Lacking expertise/staff (n = 392) 39% Lack of information/resources about how to develop and maintain an initiative (n = 392) 36% Lack of facilities (n = 392) 35% Unable to find someone who will champion the initiative (n = 392) 34% Organization is too small (n = 391) 28% Would not reduce health insurance costs (n = 392) 26% High employee turnover (n = 392) 11% Other (n = 391) 3% Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 43
44.
Regardless of whether
you have a worksite wellness initiative at your organization or not, what are some of the reasons why organizations like yours often decide not to offer a worksite wellness initiative? Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 100 to 499 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to not offer a worksite wellness initiative due to the cost of the initiative. Comparisons by organization staff size 100 to 499 employees (73%) > 1 to 99 employees (51%) • Organizations with 500 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to not offer a worksite wellness initiative because management does not see the value of it. Comparisons by organization staff size 500 to 2,499 employees (61%) > 1 to 99 employees (35%) • Organizations with 500 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 25,000 or more employees to not offer a worksite wellness initiative due to lack of time. Comparisons by organization staff size 500 to 2,499 employees (63%) > 25,000 or more employees (29%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 44
45.
Regardless of whether
you have a worksite wellness initiative at your organization or not, what are some of the reasons why organizations like yours often decide not to offer a worksite wellness initiative? Comparisons by organization staff size (continued) • Organizations with 1 to 99 employees are more likely than organizations with 100 to 24,999 employees to not offer a worksite wellness initiative because the organization is too small. Comparisons by organization staff size 100 to 499 employees (22%) 1 to 99 employees (48%) > 500 to 2,499 employees (22%) 2,500 to 24,999 employees (14%) Comparisons by organization sector • Nonprofit organizations are more likely than publicly owned for-profit organizations to not offer a worksite wellness initiative due to lack of time. Comparisons by organization sector Nonprofit (66%) > Publicly owned for-profit (43%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 45
46.
Which of the
following would you consider to be trusted and valued sources of information about creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative for your organization? Percentage Business peers or fellow human resource managers 58% Health care service providers 55% Worksite wellness vendors and consultants 54% Health care insurers 48% State and local health departments 39% Nonprofit health organizations 37% Online resources 34% Business organizations and trade associations 26% Other 1% Note: n = 394. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 46
47.
Which of the
following would you consider to be trusted and valued sources of information about creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative for your organization? Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 100 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to consider worksite wellness vendors and consultants as trusted and valued sources of information when creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative. Comparisons by organization staff size 100 to 499 employees (60%) > 1 to 99 employees (41%) 500 to 2,499 employees (66%) Comparisons by organization sector • Nonprofit organizations are more likely than publicly owned for-profit or privately owned for-profit organizations to consider nonprofit health organizations as trusted and valued sources of information when creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative. Comparisons by organization sector Publicly owned for-profit (32%) Nonprofit (52%) > Privately owned for-profit (32%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 47
48.
If there was
a network in your community for business leaders to learn about issues related to worksite wellness initiatives and to share information, how likely is it that someone from your organization would join this network? Very likely 29% Somewhat likely 45% Somewhat 19% unlikely Very 7% unlikely n = 393 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 48
49.
Role of Government
Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 49
50.
In your professional
opinion, which one of the following best describes how your organization views the government’s involvement in worksite wellness initiatives for companies like yours? The government should not really change its level of 38% involvement in helping create and expand 40% worksite wellness initiatives The government should be 15% less active in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives 20% The government should be 47% more active in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives 39% State and Local Government (n = 392) Federal Government (n = 388) Note: Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 50
51.
Demographics
Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 51
52.
Demographics Approximately what percentage
of Approximately what percentage of your your regular full- and part-time regular full- and part-time employees have employees are covered under some access to your worksite wellness initiatives? type of health care plan offered by your organization? Mean 93% Mean 78% Median 100% Median 80% Note: n = 207. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Note: n = 356. Only respondents whose organizations offer health care plans were asked this question. How many years has your In what region is your organization organization been in operation? located? Mean 54 Midwest 34% Median 35 South 32% n = 386 West 19% Northeast 15% n = 406 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 52
53.
Approximately what percentage
of your regular full- and part-time employees are covered under some type of health care plan offered by your organization? Comparisons by organization sector • Regular full- and part-time employees at publicly owned for-profit organizations are more likely than those at nonprofit organizations to be covered under some type of health care plan offered by their organization. Comparisons by organization sector Publicly owned for-profit (mean – 83%) > Nonprofit (mean – 73%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 53
54.
Demographics: Organization Industry
Percentage Professional, scientific and technical services 17% Manufacturing 14% Health care and social assistance 13% Finance and insurance 8% Education 6% Transportation/communication/utilities 5% Religious, grant-making, civic professional and similar organizations 4% Retail trade 4% Accommodation and food services 3% Administrative and support and waste management and remediation services 3% Information 3% Public administration 3% Note: n = 406. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 54
55.
Demographics: Organization Industry
(continued) Percentage Transportation and warehousing 3% Arts, entertainment and recreation 2% Educational services 2% Real estate, renting and leasing 2% Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 1% Construction 1% Mining 1% Repair and maintenance 1% Wholesale trade 1% Other 1% Note: n = 406. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 55
56.
Demographics: Organization Sector Privately
owned for-profit 52% Nonprofit organization 21% Publicly owned for-profit 19% Government agency 7% Note: n = 406. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 56
57.
Demographics: Organization Staff
Size 1 to 99 employees 28% 100 to 499 employees 31% 500 to 2,499 employees 15% 2,500 to 24,999 employees 20% 25,000 or more employees 7% Note: n = 406. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 57
58.
Demographics: Other Does your
organization have U.S.-based Is your organization a single-unit organization or operations (business units) only, or does it a multi-unit organization? operate multinationally? Single-unit organization: an U.S.-based operations only 72% organization in which the location 36% and the organization are one and the Multinational operations 28% same n = 406 Multi-unit organization: an organization that has more than one 64% location n = 406 What is the HR department/function for For multi-unit organizations, are HR policies and which responded throughout this practices determined by the multi-unit survey? headquarters, by each work location or by both? Corporate (companywide) 67% Multi-unit headquarters determines HR 52% Business unit/division 15% policies and practices Facility/location 18% Each work location determines HR 5% n = 279 policies and practices A combination of both the work location and the multi-unit 43% headquarters determines HR policies and practices n = 279 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 58
59.
SHRM Survey Findings:
Workplace Wellness Initiatives In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota Survey Methodology • Response rate = 14% • 406 HR professional respondents from a randomly selected sample of SHRM’s membership participated in this survey • Margin of error +/- 5% • Survey fielded: June 14 – July 13, 2012 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 59 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota
Télécharger maintenant