A brief informal talk from the Social Technology Conference in Toronto October 23, 2010 (http://stcu.freegeektoronto.org/). It jumbles together some thoughts I've been having about the shortcomings of the Free Software framework for dealing with social change. It's also missing some pictures to which I didn't really have the rights -- so you can imagine it in a slightly prettier version...
5. Emancipatory Technology
● We need to change the way we relate to
technology
● So alongside the formal freedoms of Free
Software, cultivate substantive freedoms
● Can't create these relations with contracts!
● More than Freedom: Emancipation
6. Autonomy
● The law we give to
ourselves
● How do we create
autonomous agents?
● The Bildung tradition
7. Pedagogy / Bildung
● Education as Cultivation
● Education as Transformation
● Education as Liberation
● The role of Technologies
21. Social Change
● It's not about legal structures
● It's not about access
● It's about practices
● What kind of “infrastructure of practice” can we
build in Toronto?
Notes de l'éditeur
** What FS offers us
*The four freedoms of FS -- to run, change, copy, and redistribute -- are a powerful "social technology" that guarantee important rights to the users of software --
*that's in a legal sense.
*In a social sense, they create conditions that encourage certain forms of sociality -- the LUG, the software dev list, the patch system, etc. *Free Software, then, /guarantees/ the 4 freedoms, but/encourages/ social transformations as well.
**** for people who already want to hack, FS is fantastic.
But for those w/out hacking skills/inclination, it isn't nearly so great.
**** FS works great /if you're already living with a certian relaiton to software technologies// --
**** what I call an 'emancipated' relationship.
So to make FS meaningful, we need to cultivate an /emancipated/ relation to technology
*** The whole point of change the way we relate to technology
Technologies enable us in many ways:
- extend our capacities to move, sense, think.
but can limit us as ell:
- when yr car breaks down & you can't think how to get around
- new relation that fixes this...
*** so ET doesn't reference a property of the technology itself, but a mode of relating to the technology, which allows it to open up new possibilities & expand your horizons
*** Kantian sense of autonomy, self-governance, giving of the rule to oneself
- why do we care about freedom?
- free rational agents who are the source of the authority behind the very moral laws that bind us
- when you give yourself the law, your ethical status changes, as do your possibioities for action. we become free by being agents of the rules that govern us
the formation of the self is the proper aim of education (cf. fr. /formation/). What does it take to put people in charge of their own technological possibilities.
b/c what matters most is this /relation/, it's never sufficient to simply give someone a piece of technology.