1. National ICT-e competence standards
for initial teacher education.
A result of collaboration by Faculties
of Education in the Netherlands.
Ton Koenraad (TELLConsult, Netherlands)
www.tellconsult.eu
Aike van der Hoeff (HAN University of Applied Sciences, Netherlands)
1

2. Innovation in Teacher Ed. to prepare
professionals to teach our next generation
2

3. Instruments to support the integration of
ICT in Education (1) :
The 4 in Balance Model
More info at NL Schoolnet (Kennisnet)
3

4. Instruments to support the integration of
ICT in Education (2):
Dutch ICT Standards for teachers
English version (2009) available here

5. Instruments to support the integration of
ICT in Education (3):
The TPACK model
Koehler & Mishra (2006)
Source:
www.tpack.org
5

6. Instruments to support the integration of
ICT in Education :
The 4 in Balance Model
6

7. Dutch ICT-e standards for prospective teachers
(Version 1, 2009)
• Collaboratively developed by NL teacher
training colleges (ADEF consortium)
• Describes knowledge, skills ánd attitudes
• Defines performance criteria
• Supports curriculum planning across disciplines
• Is not prescriptive re
subject content nor pedagogy
• Is also useful for CPD programs
7

8. CPD
8

9. Dutch ICT Standards for prospective teachers.
Contents (2013 update)
1.
Attitude
– The teacher is creative, cooperates with other teachers regarding the use of
ICT, reflects on his own behavior regarding the use of ICT
2.
Instrumental skills: Can make use of:
–
–
–
–
3.
4.
Information literacy (Information skills)
General pedagogy: can use /make ICT available to:
–
–
–
–
–
5.
office software
Learning Management Systems
testsoftware
Authoring tools for multimedia learning materials development
Present
Cooperate and communicate
Support individual work
Coach & evaluate
Test
Arrange and develop digital teaching materials
1.
2.
3.
Find
Adapt / Develop
Knowledge of copyright models
9

10. Inspired by TPACK
1. TPACK means: Technological, Pedagogical
And Content Knowledge
2. It is a model to help integrate the use of
technology in teaching and learning
3. It is not prescriptive but aims to explain the
relationship between content, pedagogy and
technology
10

11. The TPACK model,
source:
www.tpack.org
Koehler & Mishra (2006)
11

12. Technological Pedagogical Knowledge:
Knowing how ICT affects subject teaching
methodologies
Technological Content Knowledge:
Realising how ICT influences how subject
matter can be acquired.
Pedagogical Content Knowledge:
Know-how about subject specific pedagogy & methodologies

13. The premises of TPACK
• Teachers do have content knowledge, they
teach about it
• Teachers do have pedagogical knowledge and
experience, they use it while teaching
• Teachers should have ICT knowledge, so they
can use it when teaching
• These three ‘knowledges’
should be available to them
as integrated set
13

14. A use case: Language Dept. at Faculty
of Education, Hogeschool Utrecht (NL)
14

15. More info here
15

16. Why the Web?
According to Bernie Dodge:
“There are at least two reasons that the World Wide Web is an exciting
development for educators:
•
Using the Web breaks down the walls that separate schools from
everything else.
•
Using the Web forces active learning.”
16

17. Active learning
In Dodge´s own words active learning
involves:
«putting our students in situations
which compel them to read, speak,
listen, think deeply, and write.
Active learning puts the responsibility
of organizing what is to be learned in
the hands of the learners themselves,
and ideally lends itself to a more
diverse range of learning styles.»
17

18. WebQuest structure
Introduction
1. Introduction: orientation & motivation
2. Task: what?
3. Process: how?
4. Resources: which information?
5. Evaluation: which criteria?
6. Conclusion: what have you learnt
Web
resources
Task
Proccess
Evaluation
Conclusion
& and how to consolidate?
Teacher’s
page
18

19. 19

20. WebQuests in Language Ed.?
• The WQ-model can well accommodate current SLAviews and MFL methodology
- learner-centredness, active learning, focus on learning strategies
• It can help MFL teachers to:
- relate learning to the real world
- enhance & (partly) replace textbook-based learning
- support transdiscipline curriculum activities
20

21. Why a Project specifically for MFL?
Koenraad & Westhoff, 2003
21

22. Project Rationale
• 1. Support for what is a triple innovation for most inservice teachers:
– Change in language pedagogy
– extending skills: ICT and assessment & design of materials
– acquiring new or other classroom and task management skills
• 2. And … related competences development is not
widely available in initial Teacher Ed.
(Westhoff, 2005; Van den Branden, 2006; Koenraad, 2006)
22

23. Teacher’s page as TPACK evidence
Introduction
Task
Web
resources
Proccess
Evaluation
Conclusion
Teacher’s
page
• Introduction
• Target audience
• Goals / European
Framework
• Prerequisites
• Evaluation criteria
• Instructiveness
• (Planning)
23

24. Sharing (student) teachers’ products:
Open Educational Resources
24

25. From Pilot to Implementation
From teacher level to curriculum level.
• Early adopter in one
Dept. experiments in
methods course
• Shares experiences with
team members
• Other colleagues adopt &
adapt initial course
materials
• Dept. formalises course
• Other depts. include
element in their methods
courses
• Content teachers adopt
the approach and adapt
their teaching methods
• Relevant competences
included in ICT standards
• Process to realise
implementation in formal
curriculum
25

26. 26

27. Thank you for your attention.
Questions welcome.
Ton.Koenraad@gmail.com
www.koenraad.info
Credits: Images taken from the ‘Four in Balance Monitor, 2012’
English version available
27