MEVI is a multi-hop hierarchical routing protocol proposed for wireless multimedia sensor networks (WMSNs). It uses a cluster-based approach and opportunistic clustering to form clusters with minimal overhead. MEVI employs both intra-cluster and inter-cluster communication. During intra-cluster communication, non-cluster head nodes send sensed data to their cluster heads. For inter-cluster communication, cluster heads send aggregated data to the base station using multi-hop routing. MEVI selects routes based on a cross-layer approach considering link quality and energy parameters to improve energy efficiency and video quality delivery in WMSNs. Simulation results show that MEVI achieves longer network lifetime and better video quality compared to other routing protocols
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
A smart Multi-hop hierarchical routing protocol for Efficient VIdeo communication over wireless multimedia sensor networks - MEVI
1. A smart Multi-hop hierarchical routing protocol
for Efficient VIdeo communication over wireless
multimedia sensor networks - MEVI
D. Rosário, R. Costa, H. Paraense, K. Machado,
E. Cerqueira and T. Braun
3. Introduction to WMSNs I
Multimedia content has growing
importance.
Availability of inexpensive hardware such
as sensors, CMOS cameras, and
microphones allow capturing multimedia
sensor data from the environment.
Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks
(WMSNs) for carrying multimedia data
needed
4. Introduction to WMSNs II
Multimedia content can enhance sensor data
information collected.
WMSNs will enable a wide range of potential
applications in both civilian and military areas,
which require audio and video information, e.g.,
◦ Traffic management
◦ Environmental monitoring
◦ Video surveillance
◦ Industrial process control
◦ Smart cities
5. WMSN Challenges I
Multimedia content generates huge
amount of data to be transmitted over
WMSNs.
WMSNs are restricted in terms of
◦ Energy
◦ Bandwidth
◦ Memory
◦ Processing capabilities
An event-driven approach should be used
to avoid redundant video transmission.
6. WMSN Challenges II
Efficient and reliable communication
between the nodes should be used
considering
◦ Multi-hop communications
◦ Cross-layer mechanism to select routes
Delivery of multimedia content with a
minimal level of quality according to QoS
and QoE metrics.
7. WMSN Challenges III
Existing hierarchical routing protocols
have certain drawbacks
◦ High overhead for cluster creation
◦ Lack of efficient multi-hop communication
◦ Lack of an efficient cross-layer approach to
select routes based on information about link
quality level, available energy, energy
consumption
8. Multi-hop hierarchical routing protocol for
Efficient VIdeo communication (MEVI) I
MEVI considers
◦ use of heterogeneous nodes
◦ hierarchical architecture
◦ event-based application
MEVI addresses mentioned drawbacks
and provides
◦ Scalability
◦ Reliability
◦ High quality videos
◦ Energy-efficiency
9. Multi-hop hierarchical routing protocol for
Efficient VIdeo communication (MEVI) II
MEVI concepts
◦ Opportunistic scheme for cluster formation
with a minimal overhead
◦ Multi-hop communication between cluster
heads (CHs) and base station (BS)
◦ Cross-layer scheme to select routes based on
link quality and energy parameters
11. Related Work
LEACH EEQAR PEMuR
Multimedia data Periodically Periodically Periodically
transmission
Cluster Distributed Distributed Centralized
formation
Messages for Beacon Not Specified Schedule from BS
cluster formation Join and from CH
Schedule Advertisement
Elected CH
Join
Multi-hop Single-hop Multi-hop Multi-hop
Cross-layer to n/a QoS Residual Energy
select routes
11
14. Protocol Operation I
Multimedia transmissions are triggered by
sensors.
Two operational modes
◦ Normal mode
Multimedia transmission is requested by BS when a possibility
of an event occurrence is detected (soft threshold).
◦ Event mode
Nodes start multimedia transmissions when event has been
detected (hard threshold).
Two communication periods
◦ Intra-cluster
◦ Inter-cluster
16. Intra-Cluster Communication I
Period designated to nodes (non-CHs)
◦ Cluster creation
◦ Cluster members send sensed values to CHs.
Clusters are created with minimal
overhead using an opportunistic scheme
based on transmissions of
◦ Beacons and
◦ Data
18. Inter-Cluster Communication I
Period when CHs and BS communicate
with each other using multi-hop
communication.
◦ CHs send aggregate packets to BS.
◦ BS requests multimedia content for a CH.
◦ CH sends multimedia data.
19. Inter-Cluster Communication II
MEVI exploits a reactive scheme to find
routes from CHs to BS on-demand.
Reactive route discovery applies usual
scheme using route request and reply
messages.
Each path has associated a Path Quality
(PQ), which is used to identify best
routes.
28. A smart Multi-hop hierarchical routing protocol
for Efficient VIdeo communication over wireless
multimedia sensor networks - MEVI
D. Rosário, R. Costa, H. Paraense, K. Machado,
E. Cerqueira and T. Braun (braun@iam.unibe.ch)
Notes de l'éditeur
12/01/08
12/01/08
The importance of multimedia in the next years Small hardware are able to ubiquitously capture multimedia content from the environment. 12/01/08
The multimedia data made available de development of WMSN 12/01/08
12/01/08
12/01/08
Propose multi-hop using LQI, energy and hop count to select routes Increase the video quality, since it uses reliable routes MEVI, propose a scheme to create cluster which includes a minimal overhead – energy efficiency 12/01/08
12/01/08
MEVI relies on a hierarchical network architecture with heterogeneous nodes The nodes have heterogeneous capabilities and are divided into the following classes: (i) non-multimedia-aware nodes; and (ii) multimediaaware powerful nodes. CHs are used for routing, slot allocation, synchronizing non-CH transmissions, multimedia retrieval and data aggregation Non-multimedia-aware nodes are source nodes and multimedia-aware powerful nodes are destination nodes. 12/01/08
Simulations were carried out and repeated 20 times to have a confidence interval of 95%. For scenario 1 (small) use lower transmission power and for scenario 2 (bigger) user higher transmission power The Container video sequence with a QCIF resolution was chosen from the Video Trace Library. Container is the video with similar motion and complexity as expected for a fire detection system. 12/01/08
Shows the number of nodes per round that are still alive The number of nodes alive per round is same for MEVI in both versions, due to the fact that the main difference between them is that the multi-hop version includes a route discovery between CHs and BS. MEVI considers that CH are equipped with a alternative energy source Compared with LEACH, for Scenario 1, MEVI in both versions increased its network lifetime by 60%. The reason for this is that in LEACH the CH requires higher transmission power when it sends its packets to the BS, which consumes more energy. Additionally, MEVI reduces the signaling overhead to create clusters and considers two kinds of nodes 12/01/08
SSIM ranges from 0 to 1. higher value means better video quality VQM ranges fro 0 to 5, lower value means better performance. SD = Standard Deviation 12/01/08
SSIM ranges from 0 to 1. higher value means better video quality Single-hop protocols have almost the same video quality level. Since the transmitting nodes use the same transmission power at the same distance. However, MEVI multi-hop increases the video quality by 20% for SSIM and 40% for VQM. This is due to the fact that the proposed cross-layer solution selects reliable paths based on perceived network conditions. 12/01/08
VQM ranges fro 0 to 5, lower value means better performance. Single-hop protocols have almost the same video quality level. Since the transmitting nodes use the same transmission power at the same distance. However, MEVI multi-hop increases the video quality by 20% for SSIM and 40% for VQM. This is due to the fact that the proposed cross-layer solution selects reliable paths based on perceived network conditions. 12/01/08
The figure shows the video quality of a frame perceived by the user. The figure shows the Frame 266 SIM = 0.8 VQM = 1.0 SSIM = 0.5 VQM = 2.5 Thus, using QoE metrics, it is possible to get results more accurate related to the video quality from the user perspective 12/01/08