SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  18
What is Rhetoric?

 One form of human communication
What is Rhetoric?

   communication


persuasive


  rhetoric
What is Rhetoric?

 One form of human communication
 Unique “status” : social, literary, philosophical – Bryant 424
Rhetoric: Functions and Scope (Bryant, 1953)
What is Rhetoric?

 One form of human communication
 Unique “status” : social, literary, philosophical – Bryant 424
 “the [art of] use of symbols to induce social action” -
  Hauser 3
What is Rhetoric?

 One form of human communication
 Unique “status” : social, literary, philosophical – Bryant 424
 “the art of using of symbols to induce social action” -
  Hauser 3
 a “practical art” - Hauser 11
continuum of communication




 Instrumental            Expressive
 Insistence              Artistry
 Practical               Art-for-art’s sake
 Local, limited          Universal, timeless
What is Rhetoric?

 One form of human communication
 Unique “status” : social, literary, philosophical – Bryant 424
 “the art of using of symbols to induce social action” -
  Hauser 3
 a “practical art” - Hauser 11
      Cooperative / transaction
      Temporary / situated
      Limited / strategic
      Ordinary / symbolic & social
      Productive / constitutive
Rhetoric is both…




       •Product        •Process
       •Doing/action   • concepts on
                       “how” to do it
Rhetoric as Practice

Narrative

Dialectic

Rhetoric
Rhetoric as Practice
                   Narrative                       Dialectic                     Rhetoric
Mode of thinking   Storytelling; normative,        Posing of objections to all   Two-sided argument to
                   traditional, noncritical in     doubtful propositions until   arrive at likelihoods based
                   nature                          objections are refuted or     on audience standards;
                                                   the original proposition is   intersection of reason with
                                                   replaced by one better able   experience in ways that
                                                   to withstand critical         engage feelings and values
                                                   examination

Used by            Bards; poets; everyone          Experts                       Everyone

Outcome            Transmits norms                 Criticism; explores and       Probable conclusions in
                                                   tests norms, assumptions,     specific circumstances
                                                   premises

Structure          Stories, myths, religion,       Question/answer;              Public discourse & symbol
                   fable, parables                 philosophy; science           use; speeches, essays,
                                                                                 statements

Focus              Infer norms for                 Rational certainty, not       Opinion and belief that
                   appropriate/valorous acts       action                        lead to action

Subject Matter     Traditions; reality reflected   Generalizations, abstract     Specific cases
                   through storyline               principles
Rhetoric as METHOD

 Dialectic                 Rhetoric
  • “expert” argument        • “everyday” argument
  • begins with opinion      • begins with opinion
  • all subjects             • all subjects
  • contingent issues        • contingent issues
  • Generalized, “ideal”     • Concrete, specific
    questions                  questions
  • expert, technical        • popular argument
    argument leading to        leading to persuasion
    criticism & “truth”        & action
Rhetoric as METHOD

Dialectic = speculative inquiry
 concerning generalized propositions


Rhetoric = practical inquiry concerning
 concrete situations
BOTH Practice & Method

 Practice                    Method
   act, performance            planning
   shape feelings, ideas,      investigate situations,
    acts (persuading)            solutions
   expression                  how to express
   social study                intellectual study
   practical                   theoretical
   instrument                  concept
   doing                       knowing
   action                      philosophy
Aristotle Bk I, ch 2

“Rhetoric may be defined as the faculty of
 observing in any given case the available
 means of persuasion. This is not a
 function of any other art.”
The Rhetorical Situation

Lloyd Bitzer (1968)
The Rhetorical Situation

Lloyd Bitzer (1968)
Elements of the Rhetorical situation
The Rhetorical Situation

Lloyd Bitzer (1968)
Elements of the Rhetorical situation
   Exigence

Contenu connexe

Similaire à Lesson one

Knowledge and praxis research
Knowledge and praxis researchKnowledge and praxis research
Knowledge and praxis research
Amanda Carr
 
Discourse analysis
Discourse analysisDiscourse analysis
Discourse analysis
Gibson31
 
2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
MeiAihara14
 
Qualitative vs
Qualitative vsQualitative vs
Qualitative vs
zahidss2
 
Methodology for community profiles
Methodology for community profilesMethodology for community profiles
Methodology for community profiles
Tim Curtis
 
An Introduction to Critical Thinking
An Introduction to Critical ThinkingAn Introduction to Critical Thinking
An Introduction to Critical Thinking
Damian T. Gordon
 
Navigating culture for marketing success
Navigating culture for marketing successNavigating culture for marketing success
Navigating culture for marketing success
Krishnan Subramanian
 
Foundation of education
Foundation of educationFoundation of education
Foundation of education
Boyet Aluan
 
COMM324 Day1
COMM324 Day1COMM324 Day1
COMM324 Day1
asamek
 
Toward a theory of social practices
Toward a theory of social practicesToward a theory of social practices
Toward a theory of social practices
kselma
 
Arg rhetoric paces rws 305 w sp 2012
Arg rhetoric paces rws 305 w sp 2012Arg rhetoric paces rws 305 w sp 2012
Arg rhetoric paces rws 305 w sp 2012
caraincardiff
 

Similaire à Lesson one (20)

Research Paradigms
Research ParadigmsResearch Paradigms
Research Paradigms
 
Knowledge and praxis research
Knowledge and praxis researchKnowledge and praxis research
Knowledge and praxis research
 
Discourse analysis
Discourse analysisDiscourse analysis
Discourse analysis
 
Practice based research
Practice based researchPractice based research
Practice based research
 
Dr Rosemary Howell
Dr Rosemary HowellDr Rosemary Howell
Dr Rosemary Howell
 
Writing a literature review
Writing a literature reviewWriting a literature review
Writing a literature review
 
1.1
1.11.1
1.1
 
2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
 
2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
 
Qualitative vs
Qualitative vsQualitative vs
Qualitative vs
 
Interpretive paradigm presentation by vicky & savithiri
Interpretive paradigm presentation by vicky & savithiriInterpretive paradigm presentation by vicky & savithiri
Interpretive paradigm presentation by vicky & savithiri
 
Methodology for community profiles
Methodology for community profilesMethodology for community profiles
Methodology for community profiles
 
Development and research
Development and researchDevelopment and research
Development and research
 
An Introduction to Critical Thinking
An Introduction to Critical ThinkingAn Introduction to Critical Thinking
An Introduction to Critical Thinking
 
Development and Research
Development and ResearchDevelopment and Research
Development and Research
 
Navigating culture for marketing success
Navigating culture for marketing successNavigating culture for marketing success
Navigating culture for marketing success
 
Foundation of education
Foundation of educationFoundation of education
Foundation of education
 
COMM324 Day1
COMM324 Day1COMM324 Day1
COMM324 Day1
 
Toward a theory of social practices
Toward a theory of social practicesToward a theory of social practices
Toward a theory of social practices
 
Arg rhetoric paces rws 305 w sp 2012
Arg rhetoric paces rws 305 w sp 2012Arg rhetoric paces rws 305 w sp 2012
Arg rhetoric paces rws 305 w sp 2012
 

Plus de trosteck

1.intro.potter.ch1
1.intro.potter.ch11.intro.potter.ch1
1.intro.potter.ch1
trosteck
 
Study skills
Study skills Study skills
Study skills
trosteck
 
Lesson Four
Lesson FourLesson Four
Lesson Four
trosteck
 
Lesson two rhetorical situation
Lesson two rhetorical situationLesson two rhetorical situation
Lesson two rhetorical situation
trosteck
 
Heroes & celebrities
Heroes & celebritiesHeroes & celebrities
Heroes & celebrities
trosteck
 
Stereotypes
StereotypesStereotypes
Stereotypes
trosteck
 
Myths, beliefs, values
Myths, beliefs, valuesMyths, beliefs, values
Myths, beliefs, values
trosteck
 
Defining key terms
Defining key termsDefining key terms
Defining key terms
trosteck
 
Cultural approach to communication
Cultural approach to communicationCultural approach to communication
Cultural approach to communication
trosteck
 

Plus de trosteck (11)

1.intro.potter.ch1
1.intro.potter.ch11.intro.potter.ch1
1.intro.potter.ch1
 
Study skills
Study skills Study skills
Study skills
 
Lesson Four
Lesson FourLesson Four
Lesson Four
 
Lesson two rhetorical situation
Lesson two rhetorical situationLesson two rhetorical situation
Lesson two rhetorical situation
 
more factor
more factormore factor
more factor
 
Sman new
Sman newSman new
Sman new
 
Heroes & celebrities
Heroes & celebritiesHeroes & celebrities
Heroes & celebrities
 
Stereotypes
StereotypesStereotypes
Stereotypes
 
Myths, beliefs, values
Myths, beliefs, valuesMyths, beliefs, values
Myths, beliefs, values
 
Defining key terms
Defining key termsDefining key terms
Defining key terms
 
Cultural approach to communication
Cultural approach to communicationCultural approach to communication
Cultural approach to communication
 

Dernier

Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please PractiseSpellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
AnaAcapella
 
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
ZurliaSoop
 

Dernier (20)

Dyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptx
Dyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptxDyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptx
Dyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptx
 
Single or Multiple melodic lines structure
Single or Multiple melodic lines structureSingle or Multiple melodic lines structure
Single or Multiple melodic lines structure
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docxPython Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
 
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning PresentationSOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
 
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptxHMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
 
Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds in the Classroom
Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds  in the ClassroomFostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds  in the Classroom
Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds in the Classroom
 
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
 
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POSHow to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please PractiseSpellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
 
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin ClassesMixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
 
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptxTowards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
 
SKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptx
SKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptxSKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptx
SKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptx
 
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdfFood safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
 

Lesson one

  • 1. What is Rhetoric?  One form of human communication
  • 2. What is Rhetoric? communication persuasive rhetoric
  • 3. What is Rhetoric?  One form of human communication  Unique “status” : social, literary, philosophical – Bryant 424
  • 4. Rhetoric: Functions and Scope (Bryant, 1953)
  • 5. What is Rhetoric?  One form of human communication  Unique “status” : social, literary, philosophical – Bryant 424  “the [art of] use of symbols to induce social action” - Hauser 3
  • 6. What is Rhetoric?  One form of human communication  Unique “status” : social, literary, philosophical – Bryant 424  “the art of using of symbols to induce social action” - Hauser 3  a “practical art” - Hauser 11
  • 7. continuum of communication Instrumental Expressive Insistence Artistry Practical Art-for-art’s sake Local, limited Universal, timeless
  • 8. What is Rhetoric?  One form of human communication  Unique “status” : social, literary, philosophical – Bryant 424  “the art of using of symbols to induce social action” - Hauser 3  a “practical art” - Hauser 11  Cooperative / transaction  Temporary / situated  Limited / strategic  Ordinary / symbolic & social  Productive / constitutive
  • 9. Rhetoric is both… •Product •Process •Doing/action • concepts on “how” to do it
  • 11. Rhetoric as Practice Narrative Dialectic Rhetoric Mode of thinking Storytelling; normative, Posing of objections to all Two-sided argument to traditional, noncritical in doubtful propositions until arrive at likelihoods based nature objections are refuted or on audience standards; the original proposition is intersection of reason with replaced by one better able experience in ways that to withstand critical engage feelings and values examination Used by Bards; poets; everyone Experts Everyone Outcome Transmits norms Criticism; explores and Probable conclusions in tests norms, assumptions, specific circumstances premises Structure Stories, myths, religion, Question/answer; Public discourse & symbol fable, parables philosophy; science use; speeches, essays, statements Focus Infer norms for Rational certainty, not Opinion and belief that appropriate/valorous acts action lead to action Subject Matter Traditions; reality reflected Generalizations, abstract Specific cases through storyline principles
  • 12. Rhetoric as METHOD  Dialectic  Rhetoric • “expert” argument • “everyday” argument • begins with opinion • begins with opinion • all subjects • all subjects • contingent issues • contingent issues • Generalized, “ideal” • Concrete, specific questions questions • expert, technical • popular argument argument leading to leading to persuasion criticism & “truth” & action
  • 13. Rhetoric as METHOD Dialectic = speculative inquiry concerning generalized propositions Rhetoric = practical inquiry concerning concrete situations
  • 14. BOTH Practice & Method  Practice  Method  act, performance  planning  shape feelings, ideas,  investigate situations, acts (persuading) solutions  expression  how to express  social study  intellectual study  practical  theoretical  instrument  concept  doing  knowing  action  philosophy
  • 15. Aristotle Bk I, ch 2 “Rhetoric may be defined as the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion. This is not a function of any other art.”
  • 17. The Rhetorical Situation Lloyd Bitzer (1968) Elements of the Rhetorical situation
  • 18. The Rhetorical Situation Lloyd Bitzer (1968) Elements of the Rhetorical situation  Exigence

Notes de l'éditeur

  1. *BOTH dialectic and rhetoric are methodological rather than substantive ways of thinking (hows rather than whats); share some of the same features but are unique in other ways; complementary *BOTH were modes of arguing; differ in experts vs. laypeople; this means that they begin with different boundaries of opinion and experience/everyday vs. expert *BOTH are universal methods; have no subject matter that is solely theirs--->more technical, then DIALECTIC; more public and aimed to action; then RHETORIC *experts aim at criticism of the others ideas with the aim of arriving at some "truth"--->DIALECTIC examines opinions, then systematically tries to determine what must necessarily or logically follow; RHETORIC looks at problematic situations in terms of prevailing opinions and tries to result in decision and action *both operate where certainity is missing--->result in probable solutions (DIALECTIC might reach certainity) *have DIFFERENT ENDS (action v. truth)
  2. *BOTH dialectic and rhetoric are methodological rather than substantive ways of thinking (hows rather than whats); share some of the same features but are unique in other ways; complementary *BOTH were modes of arguing; differ in experts vs. laypeople; this means that they begin with different boundaries of opinion and experience/everyday vs. expert *BOTH are universal methods; have no subject matter that is solely theirs--->more technical, then DIALECTIC; more public and aimed to action; then RHETORIC *experts aim at criticism of the others ideas with the aim of arriving at some "truth"--->DIALECTIC examines opinions, then systematically tries to determine what must necessarily or logically follow; RHETORIC looks at problematic situations in terms of prevailing opinions and tries to result in decision and action *both operate where certainity is missing--->result in probable solutions (DIALECTIC might reach certainity) *have DIFFERENT ENDS (action v. truth)
  3. *BOTH dialectic and rhetoric are methodological rather than substantive ways of thinking (hows rather than whats); share some of the same features but are unique in other ways; complementary *BOTH were modes of arguing; differ in experts vs. laypeople; this means that they begin with different boundaries of opinion and experience/everyday vs. expert *BOTH are universal methods; have no subject matter that is solely theirs--->more technical, then DIALECTIC; more public and aimed to action; then RHETORIC *experts aim at criticism of the others ideas with the aim of arriving at some "truth"--->DIALECTIC examines opinions, then systematically tries to determine what must necessarily or logically follow; RHETORIC looks at problematic situations in terms of prevailing opinions and tries to result in decision and action *both operate where certainity is missing--->result in probable solutions (DIALECTIC might reach certainity) *have DIFFERENT ENDS (action v. truth)
  4. *BOTH dialectic and rhetoric are methodological rather than substantive ways of thinking (hows rather than whats); share some of the same features but are unique in other ways; complementary *BOTH were modes of arguing; differ in experts vs. laypeople; this means that they begin with different boundaries of opinion and experience/everyday vs. expert *BOTH are universal methods; have no subject matter that is solely theirs--->more technical, then DIALECTIC; more public and aimed to action; then RHETORIC *experts aim at criticism of the others ideas with the aim of arriving at some "truth"--->DIALECTIC examines opinions, then systematically tries to determine what must necessarily or logically follow; RHETORIC looks at problematic situations in terms of prevailing opinions and tries to result in decision and action *both operate where certainity is missing--->result in probable solutions (DIALECTIC might reach certainity) *have DIFFERENT ENDS (action v. truth)
  5. *BOTH dialectic and rhetoric are methodological rather than substantive ways of thinking (hows rather than whats); share some of the same features but are unique in other ways; complementary *BOTH were modes of arguing; differ in experts vs. laypeople; this means that they begin with different boundaries of opinion and experience/everyday vs. expert *BOTH are universal methods; have no subject matter that is solely theirs--->more technical, then DIALECTIC; more public and aimed to action; then RHETORIC *experts aim at criticism of the others ideas with the aim of arriving at some "truth"--->DIALECTIC examines opinions, then systematically tries to determine what must necessarily or logically follow; RHETORIC looks at problematic situations in terms of prevailing opinions and tries to result in decision and action *both operate where certainity is missing--->result in probable solutions (DIALECTIC might reach certainity) *have DIFFERENT ENDS (action v. truth)
  6. *BOTH dialectic and rhetoric are methodological rather than substantive ways of thinking (hows rather than whats); share some of the same features but are unique in other ways; complementary *BOTH were modes of arguing; differ in experts vs. laypeople; this means that they begin with different boundaries of opinion and experience/everyday vs. expert *BOTH are universal methods; have no subject matter that is solely theirs--->more technical, then DIALECTIC; more public and aimed to action; then RHETORIC *experts aim at criticism of the others ideas with the aim of arriving at some "truth"--->DIALECTIC examines opinions, then systematically tries to determine what must necessarily or logically follow; RHETORIC looks at problematic situations in terms of prevailing opinions and tries to result in decision and action *both operate where certainity is missing--->result in probable solutions (DIALECTIC might reach certainity) *have DIFFERENT ENDS (action v. truth)
  7. *BOTH dialectic and rhetoric are methodological rather than substantive ways of thinking (hows rather than whats); share some of the same features but are unique in other ways; complementary *BOTH were modes of arguing; differ in experts vs. laypeople; this means that they begin with different boundaries of opinion and experience/everyday vs. expert *BOTH are universal methods; have no subject matter that is solely theirs--->more technical, then DIALECTIC; more public and aimed to action; then RHETORIC *experts aim at criticism of the others ideas with the aim of arriving at some "truth"--->DIALECTIC examines opinions, then systematically tries to determine what must necessarily or logically follow; RHETORIC looks at problematic situations in terms of prevailing opinions and tries to result in decision and action *both operate where certainity is missing--->result in probable solutions (DIALECTIC might reach certainity) *have DIFFERENT ENDS (action v. truth)
  8. *BOTH dialectic and rhetoric are methodological rather than substantive ways of thinking (hows rather than whats); share some of the same features but are unique in other ways; complementary *BOTH were modes of arguing; differ in experts vs. laypeople; this means that they begin with different boundaries of opinion and experience/everyday vs. expert *BOTH are universal methods; have no subject matter that is solely theirs--->more technical, then DIALECTIC; more public and aimed to action; then RHETORIC *experts aim at criticism of the others ideas with the aim of arriving at some "truth"--->DIALECTIC examines opinions, then systematically tries to determine what must necessarily or logically follow; RHETORIC looks at problematic situations in terms of prevailing opinions and tries to result in decision and action *both operate where certainity is missing--->result in probable solutions (DIALECTIC might reach certainity) *have DIFFERENT ENDS (action v. truth)
  9. ART = based on observation, a set of guidelines (not a science) DISCOVERING = observing, finding AVAILABLE = not everything suited to every issue or every audience; instead POSSIBLE SAYABLES in THIS GIVEN CASE [Hauser 28] NOT THE ART OF PERSUASION = but the discovering the tools of persuasion in this case effectiveness is not the criteria might not be successful (doctor-patient) goal-oriented thinking about what will work finding AND selecting
  10. ART = based on observation, a set of guidelines (not a science) DISCOVERING = observing, finding AVAILABLE = not everything suited to every issue or every audience; instead POSSIBLE SAYABLES in THIS GIVEN CASE [Hauser 28] NOT THE ART OF PERSUASION = but the discovering the tools of persuasion in this case effectiveness is not the criteria might not be successful (doctor-patient) goal-oriented thinking about what will work finding AND selecting
  11. ART = based on observation, a set of guidelines (not a science) DISCOVERING = observing, finding AVAILABLE = not everything suited to every issue or every audience; instead POSSIBLE SAYABLES in THIS GIVEN CASE [Hauser 28] NOT THE ART OF PERSUASION = but the discovering the tools of persuasion in this case effectiveness is not the criteria might not be successful (doctor-patient) goal-oriented thinking about what will work finding AND selecting
  12. ART = based on observation, a set of guidelines (not a science) DISCOVERING = observing, finding AVAILABLE = not everything suited to every issue or every audience; instead POSSIBLE SAYABLES in THIS GIVEN CASE [Hauser 28] NOT THE ART OF PERSUASION = but the discovering the tools of persuasion in this case effectiveness is not the criteria might not be successful (doctor-patient) goal-oriented thinking about what will work finding AND selecting
  13. ART = based on observation, a set of guidelines (not a science) DISCOVERING = observing, finding AVAILABLE = not everything suited to every issue or every audience; instead POSSIBLE SAYABLES in THIS GIVEN CASE [Hauser 28] NOT THE ART OF PERSUASION = but the discovering the tools of persuasion in this case effectiveness is not the criteria might not be successful (doctor-patient) goal-oriented thinking about what will work finding AND selecting
  14. ART = based on observation, a set of guidelines (not a science) DISCOVERING = observing, finding AVAILABLE = not everything suited to every issue or every audience; instead POSSIBLE SAYABLES in THIS GIVEN CASE [Hauser 28] NOT THE ART OF PERSUASION = but the discovering the tools of persuasion in this case effectiveness is not the criteria might not be successful (doctor-patient) goal-oriented thinking about what will work finding AND selecting